|
August 31st, 2013 | #101 | |
...
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 9,744
|
Dalvez you can't reach Soldat. He's a dedicated Fredophile.
He left me this message Quote:
Soldat why don't you read the SPLC article and point out what on there would only be available to us. Tell us where you came up with that idea, other than just outright believing Fred. The only thing I see is his name, which I know from other people he had given it out, and that Angel had told me and other people it too when she was threatening to out him. From the SPLC article it sounds like Cobb provided his name anyway so it's a moot point, but Ferd would rather use it to his advantage and as an opportunity to lie about VNN. The company name, state, city, address, etc are all shown on Google when you search his name. See for yourself to see how the SPLC could have all the information presented on that page. There is the photo, I'm not sure where they got it, but I have never seen that one (otherwise I would have used it in the past to mock him) I doubt Alex had seen it either. So go to the SPLC article and tell us what information was only available to VNN admins you gullible dumb fuck. Last edited by varg; August 31st, 2013 at 01:17 AM. Reason: . |
|
August 31st, 2013 | #102 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,110
|
Speaking of which, Soldatul Vostru, what's your excuse for this?
Quote:
and: Quote:
AND: Quote:
Based on what you wrote there, I have to conclude you're not being sincere in what you just wrote here. But I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt that, based on the plain evidence against 'Fred' in official records, you'll make the correct conclusion and do what is right. |
|
August 31st, 2013 | #103 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Wrong Parallel Universe
Posts: 3,499
|
Quote:
|
|
August 31st, 2013 | #104 | ||||||||||
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,481
|
Here, I'll make things easier for the 'instant gratification' generation.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Would it be appropriate for me to start digging into the backgrounds of each and every member, and publicly 'out' them by linking their usernames with public information? The answer there is no. Like I said, I'm still a bit confused on the timeline of the whole 'outting' thing, and who linked his real name to his username first. However, once his name is out there, doing a simple google search and posting the results can be relevant on a case by case. I don't think, however, that listing something that happened 26 years ago is relevant without providing substantial supporting evidence (recently) to link the behaviors. Just my .02 Quote:
Quote:
What I am against is using information from 26 years ago as the sole basis in determining a person's character. |
||||||||||
August 31st, 2013 | #105 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,110
|
Quote:
And with the plain evidence from newspapers and court records being deleted by Fred and/or his administration, what do you conclude about Fred's guilt or innocence in this case? Does that strike you as being the action of an innocent man, unjustly accused? Or does that strike you as the action of an outed rapist madly scrambling to cover his guilt to the few people who post at his forum? |
|
August 31st, 2013 | #106 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,110
|
AA: stop it. Just stop it.
This thread is about the evidence that 'Fred O'Malley' is a convicted rapist and burglar, not about you using the opportunity to teach some kind of indeterminate lesson about ... what? and completely detracting from the original point of the thread in the process. For goodness sake: IT'S NOT ALL ABOUT YOU. It's about the clear evidence that 'O'Malley' is a rapist. You re-posting a screen full of your own posts earlier in this thread DOESN'T HELP. It is DETRACTING from the whole point of the thread. |
August 31st, 2013 | #107 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,481
|
Quote:
Like I said earlier, Fred put this target on his own back the moment he became the administrator of his own WN website. At this point, he became a voice for WN, and opened himself up to scrutiny. It has happened time and time again to WN's who put themselves out there publicly, or put themselves in the lime-light. |
|
August 31st, 2013 | #108 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,110
|
Quote:
Quote:
Being a WN is not about what you say. It's much more about what you do. Surely you, with your large and healthy White family, and your general moral rectitude (as far as I can see), can tell that. Or are we to call Martin Lindstedt a WN, too? Or Steven Akins? Last edited by M.N. Dalvez; August 31st, 2013 at 01:29 AM. |
||
August 31st, 2013 | #109 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Wrong Parallel Universe
Posts: 3,499
|
Quote:
|
|
August 31st, 2013 | #110 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,110
|
Quote:
You're either giving them too much credit, or giving people within the Movement too little. Is it really so much to go, hey, the SPLC missed this about Fred? And didn't include this information in their piece due to a simple omission, a lack of research on their part? Apparently not. Last edited by M.N. Dalvez; August 31st, 2013 at 01:29 AM. |
|
August 31st, 2013 | #111 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Wrong Parallel Universe
Posts: 3,499
|
Quote:
|
|
August 31st, 2013 | #112 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,481
|
Quote:
It takes a little information to begin with.....an email address, linking back to a photobucket account.....something to begin backtracking, looking for information.....and even that can be frustrating to do in a person's spare time. Now think about the SPLC. They could dedicate an entire team to doing this, with a budget that can afford it. No matter what you say, it is much easier for them to do so than a private individual (in nearly all the cases with the rare exception). That being said, I'm not surprised that the SPLC linked his real name and user name. |
|
August 31st, 2013 | #113 | |||
...
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 9,744
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by varg; August 31st, 2013 at 01:47 AM. Reason: ok last edit |
|||
August 31st, 2013 | #114 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 479
|
Listen, Dalvez. As I've said before, it's essentially just a matter of conflicting accounts - "he said; they said." Sorry, but the accusations leveled against him I can only take at face value. The only thing I can really use in my assessment of O'Malley's character is his treatment of me personally, which has been satisfactory. On a very personal level, we do get along.
With that said, I acknowledge that everything said about him could be true as far as I know. And to put it very simply, I don't know. Yes, I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt. Terrible me. People do repugnant things. People also change. At least, they should change. I think it's fair to say that no sentient being remains the same for any two consecutive moments, and one of the greatest things someone can do is to change; to acknowledge their faults and take measures to overcome them and ascend to a higher level of character. If someone took their punishment, did whatever was in their power to reform their ways, and genuinely attempted to change, then no, Dalvez, I don't think we should hold it against him. Certainly not after so very years. This is coming from someone with no criminal record, I'll have you know; no real skeletons in his closet. There it all is. Take it or leave it. |
August 31st, 2013 | #115 | |
Ole' Cyber Crusher
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,386
|
Quote:
What would be her gain in doing so? I don't see any kind of financial settlement in her favor. Just him going to jail, as the state (rightly) believed that he was/is a menace to society.
__________________
http://tinychat.com/finalposition2 |
|
August 31st, 2013 | #116 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,481
|
Quote:
Yes, the evidence is adequate that it was him, IMO, by having the same full name and DOB per the court records, never said or even implied that it wasn't. Doing a google search on a name that is already publicly out there is no big flaming deal. And neither is someting that happened 26 years ago without context. Guess what. 26 years ago, I didn't like girls. Does that make me a fag like Georgie? Considering current information provides context to the relevancy of past experiences. How many times do I have to say it? Judging character based from a singular incident that long ago is wreckless and intentionally dishonest or misleading. It is what organizations like the SPLC and the MSM do on a daily basis, or do you deny that fact? Now, coupled with a continuing pattern of behavior, it does become relevant. If I still didn't really like girls to this day, then guess what? You could reasonbly point a finger at my history, and judge me a fag. I know WN's that fucked gook whores in Vietnam. They miscegenated. Does that make them Anti-White now? It depends.......do they still get a woodie for slant eyes? |
|
August 31st, 2013 | #117 | |||
Ole' Cyber Crusher
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,386
|
Quote:
Quote:
This is not decided by some new age religious shit, that is decided by blood. Quote:
__________________
http://tinychat.com/finalposition2 |
|||
August 31st, 2013 | #118 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,110
|
Quote:
As I said, Fred never did anything wrong to me personally, and I (to my own shame) chose to leave him alone even when he went all-the-way in spreading false rumours about people, lying ... you know, the full gamut of Fred behaviour. But I can't, for one second, allow a convicted rapist to use the Movement to try to portray himself as respectable, allow a convicted rapist to hide his misdeeds behind the Movement. Even if 'he never did anything to me personally'. I never have, and I never, never will. Your reaction just shows that for you, it's about personalities, not principles. The evidence isn't circumstantial. In addition to the substantial evidence against him, there's also the fact that he and his admins have been instantly deleting the links provided in this very thread, seconds/minutes after they're posted on his forum. He doesn't want 'his loyalists' to know that THERE IS substantial evidence against him. Why would he do that if it wasn't him? Why has he been so silent about this? And why have him and his admin team been so quick to jump on anyone posting the proof of his crimes at his forum? The evidence is all there. You obviously don't want to pay attention to it, because 'Fred's been OK to me'. Well, good for you. That's on your head. That only speaks ill of you. |
|
August 31st, 2013 | #119 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,481
|
I need a vacation. I don't know what possessed me to post in this thread in the first place.
|
August 31st, 2013 | #120 | ||
Ole' Cyber Crusher
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,386
|
Quote:
What about the context of your wife being raped 30 years ago? Is he now redeemed? Is he no longer going to play 'hide the weenie' with Angel? I bet the two of you think he is degenerate scum but want to give a pass to Ferd the rapist. Quote:
__________________
http://tinychat.com/finalposition2 |
||
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|