|
August 29th, 2008 | #1041 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Apparently, poor retardo can't remember what was written in post #835:
Roberta: "Did Mrs. Golden accept the NAFCASH challenge and announce that she would submit evidence about the exact location and exact contents of a Chelmno mass grave as well the amount of human remains contained therein?" Gerdes: If jew-lie Golden wants to accept THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE the way it was previously, which included Chelmno and Archaeology Magazine, I, and all twenty supporters will make any and all special accommodations for such an announcement. We will bend over backwards to make sure it happens. We will set up a new challenge independent of THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE, just for her. Just like we modified the FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE just to make it easier for you retardo. In fact, nafcash challenges jew-lie golden and ARCHAEOLOGY magazine to accept a Chelmno / Archaeology Magazine challenge. Perhaps you and your fellow funny boy freaks over at HC (Hysterical and Cowardly HIV Contagious Homosexual Creeps espousing Holocaust Claptrap and other Historical Canards) can help nafcash make it happen. After all, you do want to help stop holocaust denial - don't you retardo? Thank you Roberta. You are priceless. BTW Roberta, just how much "human remains contained therein" have been located at Chelmno? And why are you trying to change the subject off of Sobibor? Answer the question Retardo: Does Sobibors "ash mountain / huge mound of human remains" actually contain human remains? To be more specific - does it contain an iota of human remains - Yes? or No? Roberta: "I don’t remember having claimed that Prof. Kola took core samples from the ash heap." Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!! Thank you Retardo. Have I ever told you that you're priceless? |
August 29th, 2008 | #1042 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Here is what I posted over at CODOH earlier today:
Oh this is priceless. Dullenkamp is back peddling like crazy. She's been lying so much, she can't keep track of all her lies, and now, she's totally confused and is contradicting herself. Here's her latest (Remember now, she allegedly just got back from a three week vacation to Spain and Germany!), answer to - What are you waiting for? She replied: "I’m waiting for the time and means to go to Sobibor, obtain permission to disturb the ash heap (which I doubt will be granted) and enlist the services of an expert to analyze the human remains and certify that they are in fact human remains (which I also doubt anyone will do for just little me)." Remember, she's been insisting all along that there have already been core samples taken and analyzed. Here are some of her statements: RM quote: "The aspect of the substance that the mound consists of, which has a light gray coloration different from the light-brown color of the soil at Sobibor (see photos mentioned in answer B.3 above) suggests the accuracy of captions describing this mound as a mound consisting of or containing human ashes." And my response: "Notice how he's trying to imply that there have been core samples taken from the mound. Let's see the photos of these alleged core samples and let’s see the results of the analysis of the alleged samples." Of course the lying coward refuses to produce the evidence. Here's more: Rm quote: "...The conclusion that the mound in question is comprised of human ash is thus the conclusion that is borne out by all known evidence and belied by none. It is also the conclusion towards which various sources of evidence independent of each other converge. This convergence of various sources of evidence independent of each other, alone or together with the absence of any evidence to the contrary, is proof that the mound in question is comprised of human ash." RM quote: "The human ashes that the mound at Sobibor is comprised of may have been dug out of one of more of the pits discovered by Prof. Kola in 2001." Notice that he's too stupid to understand that the "ash mountain" has been there for years. There is no evidence what-so-ever that there is an iota of human remains in the "ash mountain / huge mound of human remains." No photos of its construction. No photos of the alleged pits that it came from. No photos of any core samples being taken. The "huge mountain of human remains / ashes" is a mystery - just like the holohoax itself. We are told to believe because its contents are self-evident. If the contents of Sobibors mountain is a hoax, then why should anyone believe the stories of the alleged pits / graves? Imagine - a $100,000.00 reward - and basically all one has to do to lay claim to is is to prove that Sobibors "ash mountain / huge mountain of human remains" is actually comprised of human remians! They claim that they're short of money to pay Kola, yet when easy money is dangled right in front of their faces, they act like they have no need for money? Thank you Roberta. Have I ever told you that you're priceless? |
August 29th, 2008 | #1043 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
And the dull one can't remember what was written in post 847 either:
Notice Roberta's frantic attempts to change things again now that things have been boilded down to just the basics, to the point that even a retard can understand and follow them, she wants to try and change things again. No Roberta, THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE is what it is. Just Treblinka and Sobibor. And no amount of your famous childish temper tantrums will change it. The only other major change will be - IF, like I said earlier: Quote: If jew-lie Golden wants to accept THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE the way it was previously, which included Chelmno and Archaeology Magazine, I, and all twenty supporters will make any and all special accommodations for such an announcement. We will bend over backwards to make sure it happens. We will set up a new challenge independent of THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE, just for her. Just like we modified the FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE just to make it easier for you retardo.
The Chelmno / Archaeology magazine challenge is for jew-lie Golden and Archaeology magazine. If the faggots at HC want to join them, that's even better. But it needs to be a joint announcement. You yourself have agreed to be on that team: "Speaking for myself (the others you must ask directly, see above), I accept" So get your team together Roberta. When you have jew-lie Golden and Archaeology magazine and all your fellow funnyboys at HC online, make a publich challenge to nafcash. We're waiting Retardo. Are you women enough to get this team together? Now, here's what we're waiting for retardo to do: Tell us on what dates his partner shermer was physically in the Sobibor and Treblinka camps. Show us photographs that prove he was in said camps on said dates. Tell us on what dates his other partner Kola was physically in the Sobibor camp. Show us photographs that prove he was in said camp on said dates. Show us photographs of Kola excavating the alleged graves. Show us photographs proving that said graves actually exist. Tell us what the results were of the analysis of those soil core samples was. Show us proof that the "huge ash mountain" of Sobibor is actually comprised of human ash. Show us were the huge pit is that this "mountain of human ash" was dug out of. And last - but certainly not least, we're waiting for Roberta to publish, in "SKEPTIC" magazine, proof that there exists just one mass grave that contains just one percent of the alleged mass murder at Sobibor and Treblinka. What are you waiting for Roberta? How long are you going to run away from these questions Roberta? *Thank you Roberta - have I ever told you that you're priceless? |
August 29th, 2008 | #1044 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Below is my first email to Yoram Haimi, the alleged archeological "expert" of the Sobibor Archaeology Project. (Verbatim and in toto)
Quote:
|
|
August 29th, 2008 | #1045 |
gassed at least 5 times
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Wolzek (get it?)
Posts: 1,176
|
I think I have it figured out - Gerdes, did you go by the handle of Celtic Patriot? You are just like him (her). Post the same thing time and time again, without regard to any comments made or refutation posted.
Just as much of a Moonbat.
__________________
RabbitNoMore But all jews do speak in absolutes though. Just like you. ----------- Define idiot |
August 29th, 2008 | #1046 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Slamin - see post # 393
|
August 29th, 2008 | #1047 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
My latest post on CODOH:
According to the dullest of the dull (Roberto Muehlenkamp), Andrzej Kola is allegedly refusing to publish his report on his alleged "archeological excavations" at Sobibor because he has not been paid for his work. RM (via the VNN forum post #1012): Quote: As I learned from Yoram Haimi of the Sobibor Archaeological Project, the reason why Prof. Kola has not yet published a detailed and illustrated report about his 2001 findings is that he wasn’t paid by the Polish government entity that commissioned his work in 2001. So Prof. Kola is sitting on his findings, so to say, until this problem is solved – which I hope will happen in a near future. RM (via VNN forum post #1036) Quote: What I'm waiting for? ... a detailed report by Prof. Kola Well, I for one am sick and tired of waiting. I am using this forum to announce that - I will be starting a pledge drive to raise the funds needed to pay the so-called "archeologist" Andrzej Kola for his alleged "excavations" of the alleged "huge mass graves" of Sobibor. What I need from the boys over at holocaust controversies (I'm sure they will be more than willing to help me get this project started and completed) to get started on this very important project are: 1 - The name of the Polish government entity that commissioned his alleged work. 2 - Proof that this alleged entity commissioned his work. 3 - Proof that this entity owes Kola any money 4 - The amount of money this entity allegedly owes to kola. 5 - A contact person who speaks English in this alleged Polish government entity. (Or someone who can translate for me.) 6 - Contact information for Kola. And I will need the following from Kola: 7 - The amount that he claims he is allegedly owed. 8 - Proof of said claim. 9 - A pledge that he will release this phantom report that he is allegedly "sitting on" immediately after he gets his money. I would also like to take this opportunity to publicly challenge Michael Shermer to be the first person to pledge a contribution to this fund and to pledge that he will release the results of his alleged Sobibor investigation at the same time that Kola does his. Now I am presently leaving for the holiday weekend, and would like the above tasks to be completed and the information posted on the holocaust controversies blog by no later than next Tues. afternoon. Time to get cracking boys. After all, you do want to help me pay Kola the money he's owed and help stop holocaust denial - don't you? Did you get that Retardo? Get cracking. |
August 30th, 2008 | #1048 | |||||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
The "just to make it easier" nonsense is about the lamest excuse you could have come up with for having reduced a reward applicant’s chances by excluding Chelmno from the NAFCASH challenge. As this limitation also makes the NAFCASH challenge a less effective publicity stunt, I can only see one reason for it: you got scared that the challenge might be met with evidence from Chelmno extermination camp. And Dr. Nowak’s article about archaeological research at Chelmno, which I quoted from in my post # 1040 under http://206.41.117.128/showpost.php?p...postcount=1040 , only reinforces my suspicion. For it shows that the exact location of the mass graves at Chelmno has been established. All that now needs to be done, for the purpose of qualifying for the NAFCASH challenge, is to quantify the remains inside one of them, or obtain information that may already exist about such quantification. Quote:
Quote:
The question about the amount of human remains in the mass graves located at Chelmno might be interesting if Chelmno were included in the NAFCASH challenge. I would then contact Dr. Nowak for information about the amount of human remains found in those mass graves. So, when will you re-introduce Chelmno into the NAFCASH challenge, Mr. Gerdes? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||||||
August 30th, 2008 | #1049 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Your clumsy distortions and misrepresentations of my statements have been commented in my article on the HC blog under http://holocaustcontroversies.blogsp...-for-poor.html , as follows: Quote:
Ah, and next time you hack away on that CODOH thread you will give the clowns a link to a) this VNN thread and b) the HC article under http://holocaustcontroversies.blogsp...-for-poor.html right? Or are you too chicken-shit for that? |
||
August 30th, 2008 | #1050 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
And when will you re-introduce Chelmno into the NAFCASH challenge? |
||
August 30th, 2008 | #1051 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
So what are you waiting for to ask him that he put you in touch with Prof. Kola? |
|
August 30th, 2008 | #1052 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
As to me and my fellow HC bloggers, we are not your errand boys, as I pointed out in my HC article under http://holocaustcontroversies.blogsp...mbecility.html (which link you will also give the CODOH clowns, won't you, Mr. Gerdes?) |
|
August 30th, 2008 | #1053 |
gassed at least 5 times
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Wolzek (get it?)
Posts: 1,176
|
Why does Gerdes not e-mail Krege and ask for Krege's report?
Do you need his e-mail?
__________________
RabbitNoMore But all jews do speak in absolutes though. Just like you. ----------- Define idiot |
August 31st, 2008 | #1054 | ||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||
September 2nd, 2008 | #1055 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Retardo:
"Actually what has been proven is that this pit with human remains to a depth of 7.5 meters... can only be a former mass grave 7.5 meters deep, later emptied of the bodies and then refilled with soil and partial human remains left over by cremation." Where is it Retardo? Prove that this alleged "huge mass grave filled with partial human remains left over by cremation " exists. Retardo: "What I’m saying is that the bomb crater in which the digging was done need not have been the mass grave of the "Lazarett" Then where is the Lazarett then dull one? Remember, the claim is that tens of thousands of jews were shot in this alleged pit. Where is this pit that contains the remains of the alleged tens of thousands of murdered jews and the tens of thousands of bullets and shell casings? Retardo: "And even in that profile it looks like a bunch of "things" in the ground on the right hand side that could easily be mass graves." and: "No, Gerdes is probably aware that Krege found exactly what he had hoped not to find - soil disturbances compatible with mass graves." Where dull one? If Kola found "what he hoped not to find," i.e. - "soil disturbances compatible with mass graves," then the jews can find it also. What are they waiting for dull one? |
September 2nd, 2008 | #1056 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
And Dr. Nowak’s article about archaeological research at Chelmno shows that the exact location of the mass graves at Chelmno has been established. All that now needs to be done, for the purpose of qualifying for the NAFCASH challenge, is to quantify the remains inside one of them, or obtain information that may already exist about such quantification.
So, when will you re-introduce Chelmno into the NAFCASH challenge, Mr. Gerdes? Let me repeat this so the dull one can understand: Quote: If jew-lie Golden wants to accept THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE the way it was previously, which included Chelmno and Archaeology Magazine, I, and all twenty supporters will make any and all special accommodations for such an announcement. We will bend over backwards to make sure it happens. We will set up a new challenge independent of THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE, just for her. Just like we modified the FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE just to make it easier for you retardo. In fact, nafcash challenges jew-lie golden and ARCHAEOLOGY magazine to accept a Chelmno / Archaeology Magazine challenge. Perhaps you and your fellow funny boy freaks over at HC (Hysterical and Cowardly HIV Contagious Homosexual Creeps espousing Holocaust Claptrap and other Historical Canards) can help nafcash make it happen. After all, you do want to help stop holocaust denial - don't you retardo? The Chelmno / Archaeology magazine challenge is for jew-lie Golden and Archaeology magazine. If the faggots at HC want to join them, that's even better. But it needs to be a joint announcement. You yourself have agreed to be on that team: "Speaking for myself (the others you must ask directly, see above), I accept" So get your team together Roberta. When you have jew-lie Golden and Archaeology magazine and all your fellow funnyboys at HC online, make a publich challenge to nafcash. We're waiting Retardo. |
September 2nd, 2008 | #1057 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Retardo:
"The aspect of the substance that the mound consists of, which has a light gray coloration different from the light-brown color of the soil at Sobibor (see photos mentioned in answer B.3 above) suggests the accuracy of captions describing this mound as a mound consisting of or containing human ashes. The conclusion that the mound in question is comprised of human ash is thus the conclusion that is borne out by all known evidence and belied by none. It is also the conclusion towards which various sources of evidence independent of each other converge. This convergence of various sources of evidence independent of each other, alone or together with the absence of any evidence to the contrary, is proof that the mound in question is comprised of human ash. The above, my dear Gerdes, means "Yes, the mound does contain human ashes". Let's see the proof retardo. Let's see the photos of the construction of the mound and where the "human ashes" were found and the pit that the "human ashes" were dug out of and the analysis of the ashes in question that prove that they were "human ashes." This is so easy. Thank you retardo. Have I ever told you that you're priceless? |
September 2nd, 2008 | #1058 | |||||||||||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
In the area of the former "death camp" sector of Treblinka extermination camp. Where else? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The conditions you are setting are but a coward’s lame and transparent attempt to hide the fact that he’s afraid to reintroduce Chelmno into the NAFCASH challenge. Doing so requires no specific applicant let alone a team and a joint announcement. So cut the crap and answer the question: When will you re-introduce Chelmno into the NAFCASH challenge, Mr. Gerdes? Quote:
Quantification of the remains and expert confirmation that they are human remains may be forthcoming one of these days, but it won’t be easy to obtain. However there’s something that should be easy: Gerdes explaining why, according to what rules and standards of evidence or according to what logic, the kind of proof he demands is required to reasonably conclude that the mound in question, set up at what all known evidence shows to have been a place of mass murder where the victims’ bodies were eventually burned, consists of ashes from the burning of human beings. So let’s have that explanation, Mr. Gerdes. Why, according to what rules or standards other than your irrelevant own, is the proof you demand supposed to be the only acceptable proof? Quote:
Instead we’re treated to the same repetitive and irrelevant "show me" questions and demands and the same obnoxious, self-projecting rhetoric. What a bore you are, Mr. Gerdes. Even your fellow true believers seem to think so and have accordingly left us alone. You will lose your value as a demonstration object of "Revisionist" imbecility if people stop reading this thread because your repetitive rambling puts them to sleep. So how about, say, answering to the question I asked you at the end of my post # 1025 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...postcount=1025 , Mr. Gerdes? This question: Quote:
How about at least expressly confirming it? |
|||||||||||||||
September 2nd, 2008 | #1059 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Retardo:
"When will you re-introduce Chelmno into the NAFCASH challenge, Mr. Gerdes?" Let me repeat - AGAIN - this so the dull one can understand: Quote: If jew-lie Golden wants to accept THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE the way it was previously, which included Chelmno and Archaeology Magazine, I, and all twenty supporters will make any and all special accommodations for such an announcement. We will bend over backwards to make sure it happens. We will set up a new challenge independent of THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE, just for her. Just like we modified the FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE just to make it easier for you retardo. In fact, nafcash challenges jew-lie golden and ARCHAEOLOGY magazine to accept a Chelmno / Archaeology Magazine challenge. Perhaps you and your fellow funny boy freaks over at HC (Hysterical and Cowardly HIV Contagious Homosexual Creeps espousing Holocaust Claptrap and other Historical Canards) can help nafcash make it happen. After all, you do want to help stop holocaust denial - don't you retardo? The Chelmno / Archaeology magazine challenge is for jew-lie Golden and Archaeology magazine. If the faggots at HC want to join them, that's even better. But it needs to be a joint announcement. You yourself have agreed to be on that team: "Speaking for myself (the others you must ask directly, see above), I accept" So get your team together Roberta. When you have jew-lie Golden and Archaeology magazine and all your fellow funnyboys at HC online, make a publich challenge to nafcash. We're waiting Retardo. |
September 2nd, 2008 | #1060 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Retardo:
"The aspect of the substance that the mound consists of, which has a light gray coloration different from the light-brown color of the soil at Sobibor (see photos mentioned in answer B.3 above) suggests the accuracy of captions describing this mound as a mound consisting of or containing human ashes. The conclusion that the mound in question is comprised of human ash is thus the conclusion that is borne out by all known evidence and belied by none. It is also the conclusion towards which various sources of evidence independent of each other converge. This convergence of various sources of evidence independent of each other, alone or together with the absence of any evidence to the contrary, is proof that the mound in question is comprised of human ash. The above, my dear Gerdes, means "Yes, the mound does contain human ashes". Let's see the proof retardo. Let's see the photos of the construction of the mound and where the "human ashes" were found and the pit that the "human ashes" were dug out of and the analysis of the ashes in question that prove that they were "human ashes." This is so easy. Thank you retardo. Have I ever told you that you're priceless? |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|