Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old July 21st, 2008 #1
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,381
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default National Socialist Policy Toward Jews

[from Eric Thomson]

As to be expected, Goyim believe whatever jews tell them to believe, for "If it comes from a jew, it must be true," no matter how many times jews change their stories. According to jewish sources, The American Hebrew et al. "6 million jews died of a 'holocaust'" as of 31 October 1919! In fact, the jew murderer Bronstein alias Trotsky was preparing to kill Goyim in his intended conquest of Europe. Whenever a jew points a finger at a Goy, he points 3 back at himself. In other words, the jew is at least 3 times as guilty for doing what he accuses Goyim of doing.

Memory is indeed the enemy of tyranny, so I recall vividly seeing the official Allied lie about the "gassings" at the "Dachau Death Camp" before the "Miracle of 1960," in which all "death camps" & "gassings of prisoners" occurred only in the 6 Polish camps. Naturally, the U.S. Holohoax Museum makes no mention of this 'miracle,' so I wonder how they might explain the existence of the official U.S. film which claims that "many thousands" died in the Dachau gas chamber built by jew film director George Stevens, for the making of the movie. The Museum document admits that no one was "gassed" in the Dachau "gas chamber," but a sane person would wonder why prisoners to be killed were sent to another "mill of death" at Hartheim, Austria, when they were already at Dachau, where all the necessary killing facilities were available. Why go to the trouble & expense of transporting prisoners to be killed over such a distance in wartime, when transportation was both scarce & precious? Obviously, the German authorities were in no position to haul jews around before "killing them," if that had been their intention. Yes, I'd appreciate the Auschwitz article when you get it.

Memory belies these new jew lies, for Allied propaganda bragged of our total control of German airspace. Nothing moved on the ground without being subject to attacks from Allied fighter-bombers. This Allied aerial interdiction campaign was so successful that German transport could not deliver much of anything from A to B, with any assurance of its arrival. Toward the official end of the war in 1945, German cities were starving & so were labor camp inmates. Dachau experienced hunger & typhus, so large numbers of inmates & guards died in the last years of the war. Initially, all such dead were alleged to be "gassed," until the Miracle of 1960, when NOBODY outside the six camps in Poland was alleged to be gassed!

The boxcarloads of bullet-riddled bodies near Dachau were dead of .50 caliber machinegun rounds: The Allied caliber. According to her own testimony, Sabina Citron nee Winter came closest to death on a RED CROSS train which was strafed en route to Berlin, by Allied aircraft. Sabina lived throughout "the holocaust" to found "The Canadian Holocaust Remembrance Association." A British friend of mine was taken prisoner by the Germans at Dunkirk, so he spent the war in Germany. He said his P.O.W. column was being transferred on foot, by road, with a big banner which could be seen from the air: It said P.O.W., with a big Red Cross emblem. The Americans enjoyed strafing them, too, as they did German farmers with hay wagons.

Paula Hitler's phony interview remindd me of Eichmann's phony testimony in Israel. He was in a glass booth in the kangaroo court, so he could only hear through earphones & speak with a microphone. The court heard entirely different questions. Thus, Eichmann would hear: "Is your name Adolf Eichmann?" The court would hear, "Did you gas 6 million jews?" Eichman would answer, "Yes," for the court record. Eichmann's job had been to TRANSFER jews to Palestine with his jewish counterpart, Joel Brandt. Brandt was murdered in Israel to hush him up, but it appears Eichmann received no news of that; otherwise he might have behaved differently, instead of giving a magazine interview. The jews hushed him up, too. All evidence of Nazi-Zionist collaboration had to be erased, so as to promote the Holohoax.
 
Old July 21st, 2008 #2
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,381
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

HISTORICAL FACT VERSUS HISTORICAL FICTION by E. Thomson

No matter how often lies are repeated, they remain lies. Despite all the ongoing jewish effrtontery, slander and maliciousness regarding the so-called "Holocaust", the jews and their Allied accomplices should be confronted with the following facts:

All German concentration camps had cafeterias, cinemas, theaters, orchestras, sport facilities, swimming pools, bakeries, vegetable gardens, tailorshops and shoe factories. There were also bordellos to prevent homosexual behavior amongst the inmates, unlike American and British prisons, where young male inmates are frequently raped.

Thousands of jewish children were born in the camps, such as the Canadian carpet jew Givener, who admitted that he was one of many jewish children born in Bergen-Belsen, whose parents joined the Germans in their retreat from Auschwitz, before the advancing Red Army. The Germans also had maternity wards in their camp hospitals. All guards inside the camps were jewish kapos. The Germans guarded the outside perimeters for the inmates' protection.

The truth is that the jews were under protective custody, otherwise they would not have survived the war, for the peoples of Eastern Europe whom the jews oppressed would have slaughtered them en masse. If Hitler wanted to kill the jews in areas controlled by The Third Reich, none of them would have escaped, so it is obvious that Hitler intended for them to survive, which they did in their millions.

Although the liar call the German camps "death camps", the Rothschilds of France, Leon Blum, and other prominent jews survived their incarcerations quite well. Those who did die were largely typhus victims resulting from supply shortages caused by Allied terror-bombings. The fact is that most jews survived their detention. This is one time in history where millions of living people claimed that "6 million" jews died in German camps, without offering the slightest evidence for this claim. If Germany had been running such an extermination program as alleged, the victims would be silent, as were the 15,000 Poles murdered by the Soviets, whose bodies were discovered at Katyn. In the 1980s, The Canadian Jewish News reported over 5 million "survivors" who were still collecting "reparations" from Germany.

No matter how many "survivors" surface at "Holocaust" reunions, the magic 6 million number remains unchanged, just as it did from its first announcement in The American Hebrew of October 31, 1919! Six million is derived from cabalistic calculation or numerology, so the supposed 'sacrifice' or "holocaust" of 6 million was 'necessary' for Israel to be established in 1948. The fact that the 'sacrifice' is bogus does not seem to offend Yahweh, who must be pleased to see his 'darlings' use that number to fleece Gentiles and to justify their persecution of the Arabs of Palestine. The jews, Gypsies and now the homosexuals, as well as the Allied victors of World War II fear these facts, for to admit to any of them would destroy their highly profitable hate rackets.

Many jews would agree with these facts, but they fear to do so because of Zionist retaliation, including economic sanctions, exile from the jewish community and outright murder at the hands of the Mossad/ADL. The day will dawn, however, when those who loudly claim "persecution" will be unmasked as the world's foremost persectors.

* * *

"Gas-ovens" & "gasvans" are on par with the jew comic 'inventor,' Rube Goldberg, in which it takes a whole menagerie & a roomful of gadgetry to switch on a lightbulb. I invite all jews & their Goy dupes to try gassing themselves in their gasovens & then have someone try to cremate them in place. After a few explosions, they might learn why U.S. prisons keep their gas chambers far away from their crematoria. "Gaswagen" were propelled by gas made by distilling wood, because of the wartime gas shortage. No evidence exists, until some forger makes it up, that mobile gas chamber vehicles were ever used to gas jewish hitchhikers, when there are & were much more efficient ways of gassing people with carbon monoxide. The M-1 Garands issued by the U.S. Army all had "gas chambers," but I never heard that they were used to gas all the jews who could fit into one!
 
Old July 21st, 2008 #3
Mike Jahn
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 7,526
Blog Entries: 3
Default

From British author Douglas Reed's 1943 book Lest We Regret, pg. 256-257

In 1942, a book about the German treatment of the Jews in Poland was written by a Jew, Mr. Simon Segal, for the Research Institute of the American Jewish Committee, and published in America. It covers a period earlier than that in which 'extermination' allegedly began, but gives so different a picture from the 'extermination' reports, which are unverifiable, that I feel entitled to allude to it. Of forced labour for the Jews, for instance ('tantamount to extermination', this was called), Mr. Segal says, 'Like all evils, the labour battalions and labour camps may have some favourable results. Young people who were never accustomed to manual work have been forced to work with their hands. In a free Poland they may become very valuable workers'. In spite of the terrible conditions, says Mr. Segal, the Jews carried on 'intensive activity in all spheres of life'. The Jewish Self-Help, from a headquarters in Cracow, operated 250 branches in various towns. It extended aid to individuals and distributed clothing, condensed milk and other food products. The Society for the Promotion of Health performed extensive medical work; the central organization for the care of children maintained orphanages. There was also 'much cultural activity'. In July 1941 the Nazis 'permitted libraries and bookshops to open'. 'Many public gatherings were organized in the Warsaw Ghetto in connection with the 105th anniversary of Mendele Moicher Seforim and also in commemoration of Peretz and Bialik.' There were 'three Yiddish theatres and concerts are organized'.A wide gulf obviously exists between this picture and that of 'extermination', and satisfactory evidence has not been given, that this gulf.has been actually traversed.
 
Old July 21st, 2008 #4
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,381
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

"Nazi Concentration Camps"

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2074187239501225850
This one-hour film by George Stevens features repeated lies about nonexistant gas chambers at camps in Germany.

The film begins, as any magician or liar would, with a few minutes of seriously intoned nothing-has-been-altered boilerplate intended to get across to the gulping dopes that this is Very Serious Stuff.

Specifically the film asserts prisoners were gassed at Hadamar, Mauthausen and Dachau.

Hadamar: "Twenty thousand are buried here. Fifteen thousand who died in a lethal gas chamber were cremated and their ashes interred."

There were no gas chambers at Hadamar. It is a lie.

Mauthausen: An American POW named Taylor asserts prisoners were gassed, as one of a number of means of execution.

There were no gassings at Mauthausen. It is a lie.

Dachau: "Hanging in orderly rows were the clothes of prisoners who had been suffocated in lethal gas chambers."

There were no gas chambers at Dachau. It is a lie.

The U.S. army/government has no more credibility in what it asserts about 'Nazis' than it has in what it asserts about Muslims and Weapons of Mass Destruction.
 
Old July 22nd, 2008 #5
Mike Jahn
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 7,526
Blog Entries: 3
Default Expulsion from Europe, not extermination

Here's a good quote from Alfred Rosenberg who was considered to be the highest ideological authority in the Third Reich:

"The Jewish question will only be solved for Europe when the last Jew has left the continent of Europe"

Compare this with a quote from Hitler in 1941:

"From the rostrum of the Reichstag I prophesied to Jewry that in the event of war's proving inevitable the Jew would disappear from Europe"


Clearly, the concentration camps existed to hold the Jews during the war until the Third Reich could find a nation beyond continental Europe which would take them in.


Sources:

Cecil, Robert. The Myth of the Master Race: Alfred Rosenberg and Nazi Ideology.

Roper-Trevor, Hugh. Hitler's Table Talk 1941-1944.
 
Old July 25th, 2008 #6
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,381
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

The Nazis didn't even go that far. There were jews all through Germany throughout the war. Read the diaries of Victor Klemperer, if you want an example of a prominent jew who came through the war unscathed while living in Germany.
 
Old July 25th, 2008 #7
Mike Jahn
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 7,526
Blog Entries: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
The Nazis didn't even go that far. There were jews all through Germany throughout the war. Read the diaries of Victor Klemperer, if you want an example of a prominent jew who came through the war unscathed while living in Germany.
Does the book say how he avoided deportation? How many Jews remained in Germany at the end of the war?
 
Old July 25th, 2008 #8
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,381
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Jahn View Post
Does the book say how he avoided deportation? How many Jews remained in Germany at the end of the war?
Haven't finished it. The basic idea is, there are more and more legal restrictions against jews as time passes - minor stuff, but no doubt irritating. Many or most of the jews end up emigrating, as was Hitler's intent. They leave for Switzerland, Spain, Sweden, the U.S., even Asia. For whatever reason, Klemperer never gets out, although he is forever writing to people abroad seeking a position. It's a good book to read to get the everyday feel of life in Germany during the war, although from the usual left-wing jew perspective.
 
Old August 2nd, 2008 #9
Adi18
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Mazonnawar Citadel
Posts: 775
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
The Nazis didn't even go that far. There were jews all through Germany throughout the war. Read the diaries of Victor Klemperer, if you want an example of a prominent jew who came through the war unscathed while living in Germany.
I've always thought Herman Gorings quote "I decide who's a jew" pretty much says it all.....
 
Old August 2nd, 2008 #10
Mike Jahn
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 7,526
Blog Entries: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adi18 View Post
I've always thought Herman Gorings quote "I decide who's a jew" pretty much says it all.....
No, Goering was even more liberal on that issue than the mainstream of the party.
 
Old August 13th, 2008 #11
Mike Jahn
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 7,526
Blog Entries: 3
Default British author Philip Gibbs in Germany 1938

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Gibbs

From his 1938 book Across The Frontiers pg. 187-188

In Berlin one still sees many Jews, and that is surprising, at first, to English people who are led to believe that most of them have fled from Germany, or keep very much in hiding. When I walked down the Kurfurstendamm street on a Sunday morning, there were great numbers of Jewish people taking the air, looking into the shop windows and going to their favorite restaurants. I noticed that on the shop fronts many of the names were Jewish, which seemed to indicate that their businesses were still being carried on. In the East End also there is still a large Jewish population who seem to be unmolested and were doing some kind of work providing the necessities of life.

Many of them looked fairly prosperous, and were at least sufficiently well to do to take their Sunday meal at one of the big restaurants in Berlin where I happened to go for my own. Every time the swing doors opened more Jewish folk came in--young men and women, or family groups wandering round the overcrowded rooms in search of tables. They did not look frightened or miserable, though there can be no real happiness for Jews in Germany, where their race is insulted and reviled, and where it becomes more and more difficult for them to earn a livelihood with any sense of security. That is one of the worst aspects of their plight. They have no security in any business or profession.

The net has been drawn very tightly around them. There are not many loopholes in the restrictions imposed upon them, at least in the professions. Doctors, lawyers, painters, literary men, professors, are told quietly but firmly that they must get out. They lose their clients, their students, their practices. There is nothing but ruin ahead.

It is not so hard, I was told, for small shopkeepers and Jewish people in small businesses, though hard enough, especially in small towns where everybody knows everybody else's actions and social standing, and where it is not good form, according to the Nazi creed, to buy things at a Jewish shop. This rule, however, is not strictly observed in bigger cities, and I know Germans who make a point of buying in those shops because they are sorry for the Jews and do not approve of this ostracism.
 
Old February 14th, 2009 #12
Mike Jahn
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 7,526
Blog Entries: 3
Lightbulb

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anita_Lasker-Wallfisch

Anita Lasker-Wallfisch

(born 1925 in Breslau, Germany) is a German-born cellist of world renown and is a surviving member of the Women's Orchestra in Auschwitz.

Lasker was born in Breslau (Wrocław), Lower Silesia, to a professional Jewish family, one of three sisters (Marianne and Renate). Her father was a lawyer; her mother a violinist. They suffered discrimination from 1933 but as their father had fought at the front in World War I, gaining an Iron Cross, the family felt some degree of immunity from Nazi persecution.

Marianne, the eldest sister, fled to England in 1941. In April 1942, Anita's parents were taken away and are believed to have died near Lublin in Poland. Anita and Renate were not deported because they were working in a paper factory. There, they met French prisoners of war and started forging papers to enable French forced labourers to cross back into France. In September 1942 they themselves tried to escape to France, but were arrested for forgery at Breslau station by the Gestapo. Only their suitcase, which they had already put on the train, escaped. The Gestapo were anxious about its loss, and carefully noted its size and colour.

"I had been in prison for about a year. Then one day I was called down. A suitcase has arrived: could I identify it? It was my suitcase. They stole everything, they killed everybody, but that suitcase really mattered to them. They had found the suitcase and everything was fine, though I never saw it again because it then went into the vaults of the prison and later I saw a guard wearing one of my dresses."

Anita and her sister were eventually sent to Auschwitz on separate prison trains, a far less squalid way to arrive than by cattle truck. Less dangerous, too, since there was no selection on arrival.[citation needed] Her membership in the 40-piece orchestra saved her as cello players were difficult to replace. The orchestra played marches as the slave labourers left the camp for each day's work and when they returned. They also gave concerts for the SS.

By October 1944, the Red Army were advancing and Auschwitz was evacuated. Anita was taken on a train with 3,000 others to Bergen-Belsen and survived six months with almost nothing to eat. After the liberation, Renate, who could speak English, became an interpreter with the British Army.

In 1946 Anita and Renata moved to Britain with the help of Marianne. Anita joined the English Chamber Orchestra, performing as both a member and as a solo artist. She toured internationally but only returned to Germany with the ECO in 1994. She is mother to Raphael Wallfisch, a cellist (born 1953). She now lives in London.

Last edited by Mike Jahn; February 14th, 2009 at 12:11 AM.
 
Old January 20th, 2011 #13
N. Wolf
Legionary of Truth
 
N. Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Within the Soul of Europe
Posts: 151
Blog Entries: 3
N. Wolf
Default

This is Appendix 7 from Which Way Western Man? by William G. Simpson:

http://wwwm.biz.tc/wwwma7.html

THE LIE OF THE SIX MILLION

The full body of facts, of course, cannot be submitted here, but I must bluntly declare my conviction that the accumulating body of the most comprehensive, up-to-date and objective evidence now makes it positively unanswerable that the charge against the Nazis of concentration camp horrors, gas chambers, six million Jews exterminated, and all the rest of it, was from the start nothing more than preposterous, shameless, and contemptible defamation and blackmail against the great German people. Let anyone inclined to sneer at this conclusion first face the evidence in the books listed below, especially the one by the Englishman Richard Harwood, and, above all, that of Prof. Arthur Butz of our own Northwestern University, before he ever again allows this vicious charge to pass his lips.

1. App, A.J., Ph.D.—The Six Million Swindle, Boniface Press, 1973, 8207 Flower Ave., Takoma Park, Maryland 20012. Dr. App, now retired, was a professor in Catholic University, Washington, D.C. Contains impressive, validated evidence, but it is not so objective as the testimony of Christophersen (see below), or so well organized and massive as the overwhelming case presented by Richard Harwood (also see below).

2. Christophersen, Thies—Auschwitz, Truth Or Lie? An eye-witness account. 13 pictures. Published in Germany in 1973. Translated and now available from Liberty Bell Publications, Reedy, WV 25270. The author, not as an internee but as a scientist, was sent to Auschwitz to do research in the production of synthetic rubber for making tires. Auschwitz was the largest and most important of the industrial concentration camps. In these, the Government put prisoners to work producing all kinds of material for the war effort. The author spent the whole of 1944 in Auschwitz. He had the free run of the camp, and visited all the separate camps of which the Auschwitz complex was composed, including Birkenau. His wife was allowed to visit him, and he remarked: “This fact, that we were able to have our relatives visit us at any time, should prove that the camp administrators had nothing to hide. Had Auschwitz been the death factory it is reputed to have been, such visits would certainly not have been permitted.” And he declared conclusively: “During the whole of my time at Auschwitz, I never observed the slightest evidence of mass gassings.”

3. Rassinier, Paul—The Drama of the European Jew, 1964, translated from the French, available from Liberty Bell Pubs., Reedy, WV, 25270. This is the only one of four of Rassinier’s most important works analyzing alleged Nazi atrocities that has been put into English. It is well reviewed by Harwood in his Did Six Million Really Die? (see below), pp. 26-8. He says: “Without doubt, the most important contribution to a truthful study of the extermination question has been the work of the French historian, Professor Paul Rassinier. The pre-eminent value of this work lies first in the fact that Rassinier actually experienced life in the German concentration camps, and also that, as a Socialist and anti-Nazi, nobody could be less inclined to defend Hitler and National Socialism. Yet, for the sake of justice and historical truth, Rassinier spent the remainder of his post-war years [from 1948 to 1966] pursuing research which utterly refuted the Myth of the Six Million and the legend of Nazi diabolism.” “Himself an inmate of Buchenwald, Rassinier proved that no such things [as gas chambers] ever existed there.” Moreover, “he investigated all the stories of extermination literature and attempted to trace their authors . . . and found that none of these authors [whom he specified by name] could produce an authentic eye-witness of a gas chamber at Auschwitz, nor had they themselves actually seen one.” Harwood adds: “Certainly the most important fact to emerge from Rassinier’s studies, and of which there is now no doubt at all, is the utter imposture of ‘gas chambers.’ Serious investigations carried out in the sites themselves have revealed with irrefutable proof that, contrary to the declarations of the surviving ‘witnesses’ examined above, no gas chambers whatever existed in the German camps, at Buchenwald, Bergen-Belsen, Ravensbrueck, Dachau and Dora or Mauthausen in Austria.” This conclusion is supported by the testimony of Stephen F. Pinter, a lawyer for the U.S. War Department who served for six years after the war in the occupation forces in Germany and Austria. In the Catholic magazine Our Sunday Visitor, June 14, 1959, he testified as follows:

“I was in Dachau for 17 months after the war . . . and can state that there was no gas chamber at Dachau. . . Nor was there a gas chamber in any of the other concentration camps in Germany.” [And, this verdict “has now been recognized and admitted officially by the Institute of Contemporary History at Munich.”] Pinter went on to say: “We were told that there was a gas chamber at Auschwitz, but since that was in the Russian zone of occupation, we were not permitted to investigate since the Russians would not allow it. . . I interviewed thousands of Jews, former inmates of concentration camps in Germany and Austria, and consider myself as well qualified as any man on this subject.”

As far as the charge of gas chambers at Auschwitz may be concerned, we have the testimony of Christophersen given above, that this was absolutely false.

And finally, Harwood goes on to say: “Prof. Rassinier is emphatic in stating that the German Government never had any policy [for the solution of the Jewish problem] other than the emigration of Jews overseas.” (Harwood, op. cit., 26-7.)

4. Harwood, Richard E.—Did Six Million Really Die? Historical Review Press, 1975, Richmond, Surrey, England. 12 illustrations. Available from Examiner Books, P.O. Box 783, New York City, 10022 and from Liberty Bell Pubs., Reedy, WV 25270. It was written before Professor Arthur Butz’ book was published. Of all the available books that examine the Six Million charge, this is the most compendious, up-to-date and easily read. And it is by an Englishman, a specialist devoted to the investigation of political and diplomatic aspects of the Second World War, and associated with London University. And his book completely demolishes, item by item, the claim that the Nazi Government put six million Jews to death.

(a) To begin with, the six million figure, on the basis of statistics supplied by the World Almanac, the New York Times, and the Jews own published computations, it is absolutely impossible to maintain. By careful compilation and analysis of the most reliable statistics, and checking them one against another, Harwood comes to the conclusion that “the number of Jews in Nazi-occupied Europe after emigration [which totaled some 3.5 million] was scarcely more then 3 million, by no means all of whom were interned.” Even the Jewish Joint Distribution Committee “officially” estimated that over 1.5 million Jews lived in Nazi-occupied territory right through the war. This means that “the number of possible wartime Jewish deaths could not have exceeded a limit of one and a half million” (pp. 5-6). It is surely significant that by 1961, at the Eichmann trial, “the Jerusalem Court studiously avoided mentioning the figure of Six Million, and the charge drawn up by [the prosecution] simply said ‘some’ millions” (p. 9).

That six million is a gross exaggeration is further established if, instead of concentrating on the figures for the Jewish population in Europe before and after the war, we compare the figures for the Jewish world population before and after. I quote Harwood: “The World Almanac of 1938 gives the number of Jews in the world as 16,588,259. But after the war, the New York Times, February 22nd, 1948, placed the number of Jews in the world at a minimum of 15,600,000 and a maximum of 18,700,000. Quite obviously these figures make it impossible for the number of Jewish war-time casualties to be measured in anything but thousands. [Emphasis added.] 15 1/2 million in 1938 minus the alleged six million leaves nine million. The New York Times figures would mean, therefore, that the world’s Jews produced seven million births, almost doubling their numbers, in the space of ten years. This is patently ridiculous” (pp. 6-7).

(b) The concentration camps were not set up for exterminating anybody. Since they were first used by the British in the Boer War they had been accepted as the only means by which a nation could protect itself against subversive activities of masses of enemy aliens in wartime. World Jewry had declared war on Hitler as early as 1933 at their Economic Boycott Conference in Holland; and Chaim Weizmann, the principal Zionist leader, had reinforced this in September 1939 by pledging to “fight on the side of the democracies,” and by offering to make immediate arrangements for throwing Jewish manpower and other resources into the struggle. (Jewish Chronicle, 9/8/39.) Yet Germany did not begin putting Jews into concentration camps until after the United States and Canada had thus confined their Japanese aliens, which they did even though the Japanese had made no such declaration of disloyalty as that made by the Jews against Germany. The Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on Its Activities during the Second World War, Geneva, 1948, as always faithful to its well-known tradition of strict political neutrality, clarified “the legitimate circumstances under which Jews were detained in concentration camps, i.e., as enemy aliens.” They “were arrested for political or racial motives because their presence was considered a danger to the State or the occupation forces.” (Report, Vol. III, p. 73.) The Report affirms that the German camps were well disciplined and well administered. Until the utter collapse of the last few months of the war, the inmates, though kept at work in support of the war effort, were well fed and clothed, and provided with medical care, and with hospital care if needed. Moreover, all internees, unlike those in Soviet camps, could receive gifts from outside. The Red Cross testified that “from the autumn of 1943 until May 1945, 1,112,000 parcels with a total weight of 4,500 tons were sent off to the concentration camps.” (Vol. III, p. 80.) These contained food, clothing, and pharmaceutical supplies. “Parcels were sent to Dachau, Buchenwald, Sangerhausen, Sachenhausen, [many others], Mauthausen, Theresienstadt, Auschwitz, Bergen-Belsen,” etc. Jews were specifically mentioned as recipients. “The Committee was in a position to transfer and distribute in the form of relief supplies over twenty million Swiss francs collected by Jewish welfare organizations throughout the world, in particular by the American Joint Distribution Committee of New York.” (Vol. I, p. 644).

(c) The Nazis never had any policy of Jewish extermination. Harwood says: “It should be emphasized straightaway that there is not a single document in existence which proves that the Germans intended, or carried out, the deliberate murder of Jews.” Though thousands of documents were captured, from all levels of the Nazi hierarchy, there is not one that makes any mention of extermination. This, in fact, “has been admitted by the World Centre of Contemporary Jewish Documentation at Tel-Aviv.” (Harwood, pp. 8-9.) All the evidence proves that from the beginning of Hitler’s rule, in 1933, and maintained to the end, the Nazi policy was based on the conviction that Germany belonged to the Germans, and that the Jews, who as a whole had proved themselves adamantly alien, corrupting in their spiritual and cultural influence, and doubtful in their loyalty to the German State, should be denied German citizenship, deprived of their influential positions within the nation, and as soon and as largely as possible removed from German soil. To the end Jewish emigration remained the Nazis’ “final solution” of the Jewish problem. Moreover, “by 1939, the consistent efforts of the German Government to secure the departure of the Jews from the Reich had resulted in the emigration of 400,000 Jews from a total population of about 600,000 [that is all there were in Germany proper], and an additional 480,000 emigrants from Austria and Czechoslovakia, which constituted almost their entire Jewish populations. Had Hitler cherished any intention of exterminating the Jews, it is inconceivable that he would have allowed more than 800,000 to leave Reich territory with the bulk of their wealth, much less considered plans [as he manifestly did] for their mass emigration to Palestine or Madagascar.” “Even as late as May 1944 [at the beginning of the last twelve months of the war], the Germans were prepared to allow the emigration of one million European Jews from Europe.” This, of course, would have included Jews from countries occupied by Germany—notably, Polish Jews. And again, this was something totally incompatible with the charge that the Nazi aim was Jewish extermination (pp. 4-5).

(d) How then did it ever come about that such charges were almost universally accepted as valid?

Doubtless, it was largely due to the impact made on world opinion by the so-called Nuremburg “Trial.” Care was taken to make the unthinking public assume that its proceedings were in accord with honored Western jurisprudence, but, the grim reality was perhaps first revealed by Mr. F.J.P. Veale in his Advance To Barbarism. (Published 1948; revised edition 1968. Cp. de Poncins—State Secrets, Britons, 1975, Chap. 4.) The Nuremburg “Trial” trampled all legal precedents under foot from start to finish. Its spirit was murderous. The testimony desired against the defendants was often extorted by promises of favor, or by threats, or by actual physical torture (Harwood, pp. 10-11). The crimes of the Allies, often worse than those charged against the Nazis, were barred from mention. As a “trial” it was a criminal farce. The defendants were doomed before it began. It has justly been dubbed “victors’ vengeance.” It set a fearful precedent for the treatment to be meted out to the leaders of the vanquished in future wars (Ibid., p. 9, Sec. 5).

It is a matter of record that the idea of setting up a court of justice for punishing Nazi war criminals was first proposed by Dr. Nahum Goldmann, President of the World Jewish Congress, at its Pan-American Conference in Baltimore in 1941—that is, before the war had run even half its course. The idea was then studied and perfected before being imposed on the American Government and the associated Powers. (See Goldmann—Memories, pp. 216-7; de Poncins—State Secrets, Britons, 1975, p. 50ff.) It was thus the Jews’ hysterical hatred that hovered over every session of the Court and ensured that their intended victims did not escape.

But the uncovering of such facts, of course, was kept from the knowledge of the gentile public by the Jewish control of all the important means by which the minds of our people, from age 60 down to age 5, are reached and shaped.

And this sea of ignorance served well to float publishing ventures of many kinds and in large quantity. Book after book, most of them Jewish authors, laden with horror upon horror, alleged to have been witnessed and blending fragments of truth with the most grotesque fantasies and lies, were launched upon the world. They have been well run down and proved, by such men as Rassinier and Harwood, to be foul and contemptible frauds. Conspicuous among these is the so-called “Diary” of Anne Frank, which, in 1959, seven years after its initial publication, was proved by a decision of the New York State Supreme Court to have been a hoax (op. cit., p. 18). But about all this there has been little or nothing from our newspapers, radio and TV—but silence. And in consequence, it is probably safe to say that not one of our people out of a thousand has any doubt but that Hitler and the Nazis were hideous monsters, sub-human beasts, and the German people, too, who so largely followed and supported them, little better.

(e) But whatever could have induced the Jews to stoop to methods that to us seem so contemptible? Well, obviously, the stakes were enormous.

In sizing up the Jewish conduct here, we must never for a moment allow ourselves to forget that their dominant, relentless, and absolutely undeviating aim is to make themselves the undisputed masters of all humanity. Also, we know, from our examination of the Talmud, that in their dealings with gentiles they are prepared to be completely unrestrained by any moral scruples whatever. Freedom to deceive and lie to gentiles is expressly allowed them.

And so, if, with clear conscience, they could let loose upon the world the holocausts of the two world wars in order to advance themselves toward world dominion, as there is reason to believe they did, it would obviously be for them a small matter to keep the ball of destruction rolling by putting forth the tall tale of the Six Million. I doubt if there was a Jew in all the world who did not instantly realize it was a lie: Jews understand one another. But our Simple Simon White folk swallowed it hook, sinker and line, without once so much as catching a glimpse of the grinning Jew on the other end of the fishing rod. It seems that for our people a report or statement has but to come out in a newspaper or on radio or television, and it is at once accepted as gospel truth. But to one another the Jews whisper, “What easy marks they are!” And how enormously to their advantage their hoax has proved itself to be! Let us therefore examine closely what their gains from it have added up to.

(1) Having saturated the consciousness of the world with the belief that the Nazis did actually butcher some six million Jews, they were able to extort about 43 billion dollars out of the German people, mostly for their bandit State of Israel. At bottom, it was a raw case of blackmail.

(2) By thus conditioning the consciousness of mankind to accept their charge that the Nazis had been guilty of a “crime against humanity” beside which even that of Genghis Khan with his pyramids of the skulls of his beheaded enemies, seems to pale into insignificance, they made Germany the pariah, the outcast leper, among the nations of the Earth, and thus drove a wedge between our peoples. It is certain, as came out plainly enough at the Yalta and Teheran Conferences and in statements by outstanding Jewish spokesmen, that the Jews have long been fully aware that if they are ever to achieve their dominion of the Earth, the nations of the White man, and above all Germany, have got to be destroyed. Their strategy therefore has been divide et impera—to conquer by dividing, by setting one part of the whole against another. And by fouling the honor and good name of the German people they have engendered in the rest of our people condemnation, repugnance and antagonism, and consequent mistrust, against precisely that one of our nations which was perhaps best qualified to lead us in the coming struggle. Might not the Jews have thus ensured that we White men of the world will be unable to achieve that united front upon which in the near future our very survival may depend?

(3) Further, since the atrocities were alleged to have been committed at a time when the Government of Germany was nationalist, nationalism everywhere has been stigmatized and discredited. Though a nationalist totalitarian government under which all the energies and resources of a people can be coordinated and directed with a view to their survival, may, as an emergency measure, be their only hope of surviving an hour of direst peril, our people have become so prejudiced against it that they will fail to resort to what alone can save them.

(4) The lurid tales of Jewish sufferings called forth a flood of maudlin sympathy in pudding-headed gentiles—especially in Christian gentiles. In consequence probably most American citizens would now endorse those four-fifths of our Senators who are reliably reported as being committed in advance to giving the State of Israel almost anything it asks for, and would approve our continuing to make Israel an annual outright gift of billions of dollars and our placing at its disposal our most advanced military equipment even before it reaches our own forces in Europe—all to enable Israel not only to keep the lands it wrested from the Arabs by one of the foulest acts of aggression known to history, but to extend them by yet further aggression.

(5) The Jews have attributed the alleged Nazi murder of the six million to what they call the Germans’ “racism.” And by “racism” they mean a recognition of race as a reality, which they declare unfounded, and an emphasis on its importance, which they pronounce a menace to the peace and well-being of mankind. At the present time, perhaps there is no word in the English language so charged with repugnance and condemnation as is “racist,” and anyone who makes or proposes to make any discrimination between one man and another on the basis of race is liable to be treated as if he were a felon. It at once becomes apparent, if one looks closely beneath the surface of the situation, that this attitude toward race is the result of an organized, coordinated and heavily financed drive, simultaneously concentrated on White men wherever they exist, to expunge all racial motivations from their consciousness. And at the bottom of it all is the Jew.

And yet, as already laid bare in earlier pages of this book, the Jews themselves have been more fanatically race-conscious and more fiercely determined to keep themselves a people apart from all others, than any other people known to history. It is universally recognized, not only by all students of the Jewish record, in all lands, but by the Jews’ own foremost leaders and spokesmen, that it has been only by their insistence on their race, by their refusal to mix their genes with those of gentiles, that they have been able to survive through thirty centuries. And it just won’t go down, for all their present furor over the charge in the U.N. that Zionism is racism, for them, at this date, to try to make out that “Zionism is only a religion.” Zionism may indeed have its roots in the religious faith that has inspired nearly all Jews since the day when their tribal god Yahweh is believed to have made his famous contract with the Hebrew followers of Moses, but in its ultimate aim it is political, and the realization of the aim is made to depend on the fulfillment of conditions that are racial and nationalist in the extreme. As we have already seen, their religion, which is the driving force behind Zionism, teaches them that they alone are human beings, or, as Samuel Untermeyer put it in 1933, a little more modestly, that they “are the aristocrats of the world.” In either case, the Earth was made for them to rule, and gentiles to be their servants and slaves, their milk cows. One can quote any number of Zionists of the highest status and authority, to the effect that Jews are aliens, and are forever determined to remain aliens, amidst the people of any gentile nation that may take them in. No matter their oaths of allegiance to the country of their adoption, their first loyalty is to Israel. Jews who profess to share the patriotism of their gentile hosts “are simply living lies.” Any Jew who fails to give his first loyalty to the State of Israel “is a traitor to the Jewish people.” It should be observed, too, that Norman Podhoretz, editor of the very influential Jewish paper Commentary, recently remarked: “It has become clearer and clearer that something has happened to the Jews of America: they have all been converted to Zionism.” That is, they are now giving their first allegiance to Israel. This inevitably means that if we Americans accept a Jew as our Secretary of State, Chairman of the Federal Reserve, editor of the very powerful New York Times, or owner and controller of an even more powerful TV network, we should expect him to put the advancement of the State of Israel above his concern for the well-being of the United States of America. It was long experience of just such perfidy on the part of the Jews that largely determined the German Nazis to cancel all Jewish citizenships and to adopt a policy aimed at removing all Jews from German soil.

Fierce for racial consciousness in himself, fierce against it in us! What can be the explanation? Is it not at once obvious—if one but stop to think?

Race consciousness, and discrimination on the basis of race, are absolutely essential to any race’s survival, and to any nation’s survival—essential for the homogeneity, the solidarity, and the formidable strength without which no people can long survive. That is why the Jews are so fiercely for it for themselves, because they mean not only to survive but to become master; and fiercely against it for us, because we are their intended victim, and they wish to emasculate us and to paralyze us to the point where we cannot thwart their determination to put us in chains. Unless we recover our race consciousness, and maintain it, and heighten it, and live by it, we shall die.

Verily, an enormously profitable hoax was this lie of the six million. Mr. Harwood declared it “the most profitable atrocity allegation of all time.” And Dr. Max Nussbaum, former chief rabbi of the Jewish community in Berlin, proclaimed triumphantly, in April 1, 1953, that “the position the Jewish people occupy today in the world . . . is ten times stronger than what it was twenty years ago”—when Hitler came to power, and when the Jews first declared war on him and launched their “world-wide crusade” to bring him down. Perhaps now, after the lapse of another twenty-odd years, it would have to be admitted that the Jews are the strongest power in the world and for us the most dangerous. For the point of their whole engine of demolition is now leveled against the base of our citadel. Ludovici revealed the eye of prophetic genius when, as long ago as 1949, he said to me: “Nothing but a miracle can now save our civilization from complete destruction.”

Since the above was set up in type another book on “the six million” has come to my attention. As yet I have not had time to get a copy of it from England (no one in the U.S. dared to publish it), but from the extremely high praise it has called forth from very discriminating and honest reviewers, I judge that it will establish itself as the absolutely unanswerable exposure of the Jews’ charge as an infamous and shameless lie, and leave them without a leg to stand on. The only question then will be whether, in the face of their tight control of the mass media, the truth can be made known to the world.

5. Butz, Arthur—The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, Historical Review Press, 23 Ellerker Gardens, Richmond, Surrey, England, but obtainable much more quickly from Liberty Bell Publications, Reedy, WV 25270. Mr. S.E.D. Brown, editor of the South African Observer, in reviewing the book (Sept., 1976), declared that Prof. Butz “demolishes the greatest propaganda legend of our times—the legend that the Germans attempted to ‘exterminate’ the Jews during World War Two. Combining the historian’s mastery of documents with the technical knowledge of a scientist, Prof. Butz’ book is the product of a massive research effort lasting three years. . . In all essentials, his book . . . is the last word on the subject. . . in the breadth of its scope and the depth its research it will remain the most complete statement of its kind yet written.”

The book is also reviewed, brilliantly and at greater length, in Mr. Wilmot Robertson’s Instauration for October, 1976 (page 9). I limit myself to quoting a few lines.

“If there ever was a time in human history when falsehood was about ready to put truth permanently out of business, it was the last three decades—from the cocoon stages of the Six Million Myth in early World War II through the avalanche of death camp propaganda in the late 40’s to the present era of total acceptance. How can a lie be nailed down when the whole world believes in it, when 99.99 per cent of the world’s magazines, newspapers, textbooks, educators, scholars and historians pay total obeisance to it? . . .”

“It is a strange sort of truth that must be upheld in lawsuits, jail terms, threatening headlines and social ostracism . . .”

“All the more reason that The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, a model of scholarship, research and erudition, deserves the fair and open hearing that the liberal-minority coalition is determined it shall not have. One of the greatest works of counterpropaganda ever written, it dearly demonstrates that the West’s will for truth, though moribund, is not dead. It takes courage to wrestle with a taboo that no respectable historian and no respectable publisher would dare to touch. It takes immense courage for the author to write such a book under his own name. As a professor at Northwestern University, Dr. Butz has opened himself and his career to attack from some of the world’s most rabid and most vengeful organizations.”
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:27 AM.
Page generated in 0.18248 seconds.