Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old October 8th, 2020 #1
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default 'The Big Bang Was Not the Beginning'

'The Big Bang Was Not the Beginning'

Roger Penrose says he's spotted signs from a previous universe

Oct 7, 2020

Look carefully into outer space and you might spot the remnants of a previous universe. So argues Roger Penrose, a pioneer in the study of black holes and one of three recipients of this year's Nobel Prize for Physics. "The Big Bang was not the beginning," he tells the Telegraph. "There was something before the Big Bang and that something is what we will have in our future." Penrose, 89, argues that several "warm" areas in space are really leftover black holes from an earlier universe or "aeon." The idea is based on work by his old collaborator, Stephen Hawking, who said black holes leak radiation and slowly evaporate. But this seems to occur so slowly that their destruction could take longer than our universe itself.

https://www.newser.com/story/297159/...your-mind.html
 
Old October 8th, 2020 #2
Ray Allan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 15,170
Default

Makes sense, something had to have actually produced the Big Bang. It just wouldn't have spontaneously sprang from nothing.
__________________
"Military men are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy."

--Henry A. Kissinger, jewish politician and advisor
 
Old October 8th, 2020 #3
Dawn Cannon
Senior Member
 
Dawn Cannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The Vampire Ball
Posts: 6,409
Default

Only The Electric Universe makes sense, none of this silly Big Bang rubbish.
 
Old October 18th, 2020 #4
Donncha Dennis
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 363
Default

Why would the electric universe hypothesis be the one that makes sense?
 
Old October 18th, 2020 #5
Dawn Cannon
Senior Member
 
Dawn Cannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The Vampire Ball
Posts: 6,409
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Donncha Dennis View Post
Why would the electric universe hypothesis be the one that makes sense?
Try this, Dennis:

In this groundbreaking paper Wal Thornhill introduces a new Theory of Everything: The Electric Universe. Set aside everything you think you know about all things great and small because the ideas presented here overturn it all. Was there a big bang? Not likely. Einstein’s Relativity? Doesn’t hold up. Is the Sun a thermonuclear fusion reactor which will eventually run out of fuel and burn out? Nope. Are there black holes? No such thing. What about dark matter and dark energy? Forget about that nonsense and start learning about the science of the 21st century. “. . .the Electric Universe is the only coherent cosmology that has correctly predicted and explained discoveries in the space age.”

The SAFIRE sun confirms the Electric Universe hypothesis that the Sun (and all stars for that matter) are not thermonuclear phenomena after all, but in fact fundamentally electrical in nature.

https://thesecularheretic.com/the-el...iverse-heresy/
 
Old October 18th, 2020 #6
Ray Allan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 15,170
Default

We can produce thermonuclear reactions ourselves in the form of hydrogen bombs and fusion reactors. This Electric Universe theory postulates that our Sun is a giant nuclear plasma reaction, not a nuclear fusion reaction. Interesting hypothesis, but I am not a physicist, so I really can't comment very intelligently about it. All I can say is we are certainly far from knowing everything about the universe, and probably never will.
__________________
"Military men are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy."

--Henry A. Kissinger, jewish politician and advisor
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:52 AM.
Page generated in 2.49125 seconds.