White or not White?

[diabloblanco92]

Originally Posted by Kamangir42

Scientific racism lay dormant for more than 20 years because of the role it played during the Second World War. But, it re-emerged in the West in 1969 with the publication of an article entitled How much can we boost IQ by Arthur Jensen, an American educational psychologist.

In the article, Jensen asserts that it was the innate genetic inferiority of blacks, rather than inequitable social and educational systems, that caused compensatory programmes in the US to fail.

His article caused an immediate furore but he was supported by scientists like William Shockley (Nobel laureate in physics for his work on the transistor) who recommended cash inducements for the sterilisation of blacks and members of the working class to prevent the decline of US national intelligence.

Lynn and Vanhanen, who are the latest proponents of these racist theories, argue that nations whose populations have high IQs will tend to have intelligent and efficient political leaders, and public and private personnel that would contribute to the strength of the economy at all levels, hence making it possible to produce highly sought-after goods and services at competitive prices.

Lynn and Vanhanen say their argument is supported by research in the US, UK and Spain which show that individuals and groups with higher IQ scores tend to have higher incomes.

However, it has also become increasingly popular in recent times to relate success to "emotional intelligence" (EQ). Those who score highest in terms of EQ tend to display greater interpersonal ability and selfconfidence, and are said to rise more quickly to the top of organisations.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology linguistics professor Noam Chomsky suggests that unsavoury characteristics such as ruthlessness, cunning, avarice, subservience to authority, sycophancy and lack of principles might outweigh IQ as factors in the attainment of wealth and power.

Critics say Lynn and Vanhanen have got their argument backwards as it makes far more sense to argue that the populations of rich countries do better on IQ tests because they have access to better nutrition and education.

Dr Shephard says studies show that good nutrition and exposure to a stimulating environment throughout childhood can increase IQ scores by a few points.

"If you come from a poor African country, you could be nutritionally deprived and you might not have received the right environmental stimulation.

"Whole generations could be deprived of their full potential practically from the moment of conception," adds Dr Shephard.

Chan says: "I think it's more likely that they have the causality reversed. A country with a high GDP would be able to provide a material and cultural environment that on average allows for better performance on IQ tests.

"Indeed, the more interesting question, with causality reversed, is why countries like Cuba and the exsocialist countries have high levels of human resource development (including widespread literacy and technical competence), despite relatively low levels of GDP."

Source: http://physicsforums.com/archive/t-14568

Don't even go there! I know enough Cuban-Americans to realize that Cuba is a crumbling, racially decaying hell that people of all races will climb into an inner tube and try to paddle 90 miles through shark-infested waters in the middle of hurricane season to escape. They are living on artions of a few pounds or rice and beans and 1/4 pound of beef per month.
Cuba 1959-73% White with the second highest per capita income in L:atin America, a White tropical paradise
Cuba- 2004 37% White, a broke , starving, racially and economically decaying HELL

diablo

Originally Posted by diabloblanco92

Don't even go there! I know enough Cuban-Americans to realize that Cuba is a crumbling, racially decaying hell that people of all races will climb into an inner tube and try to paddle 90 miles through shark-infested waters in the middle of hurricane season to escape. They are living on artions of a few pounds or rice and beans and 1/4 pound of beef per month.
Cuba 1959-73% White with the second highest per capita income in L:atin America, a White tropical paradise
Cuba- 2004 37% White, a broke , starving, racially and economically decaying HELL

diablo

37% White? I'd say it's a bit overstated, in any case White Cubans have assimilated quite well and have rose to very prominent positions, especially those in Florida. Argentina is slowly headed down this same path, until very recently it was over 90% White, now with the economic crisis and slow racial decay it is more like 70-80% White.

[diabloblanco92]

Originally Posted by Shapur

Sure they don`t like dark skinned Aryans! I will say why.
The Germans have marrige about 50.000-100.000 Thai women and every Thai-German family get more then 2-3 children.
This is called RACEMIXING!
The south Europeans or how these Mongolian muds of Thais call them
can not marrige with south Europeans because we so called darkies shit on these Mongoloid Thais.

Do you real think it is a matter for me what Mongoloids think about me?
I will overrun them with my race, you can assimilate them because they think you are so superior. Only those poeple are superior who know that Aryans don`t need any words that they are superior because they are superiors!

Thats so true, they dont like us Med-Aryans, I consider that a badge of hionor. But Nordic and Med women LOVE us, and thats all that matters, our own blood

diablo

Since when are Iranians and Mediterraneans one in the same? That seems to be what these Iranians latch on to when they want to convince everyone that they are "White Aryan Meds".


P.S. Your buddy Shapur should work on his grammar, his grasp of the English language is at the same level of a New Guinean tribesman.

Originally Posted by diabloblanco92

Thats so true, they dont like us Med-Aryans, I consider that a badge of hionor. But Nordic and Med women LOVE us, and thats all that matters, our own blood

diablo

Keep grafting these black eyed darkies in with Southern Europeans, and I'm sure that'll lead other suspicious Europeans to accept Mediterraneans with open arms. As if Italy and Greece didn't have to face enough issues concerning racial purity...

[diabloblanco92]

Originally Posted by Kamangir42

It does. Pay more attention.



Let me ask an illuminating question about Iranians in the West. When did Iranians start moving to the West in large numbers? Following the Islamic Revolution in 1979. So they didn't come because they wanted to be parasites in the West, rather it was the change in regime in their homeland that led to the migration. This is in sharp contrast to Mexicans, Arabs, Turks and most other migrants who came permanently with no regard to the political situation in their country (Turkey and Mexico have been getting richer, unlike Iran, over the period of migration) and who are burdens on their host state. Iranians should be the least of your concern. Oh well, your choice I suppose.

I think the IQ data is not only rubbish (how do you accurately measure intelligence and who puts any faith in IQ tests?), the conclusions Lynn and Vanhannen reach are also highly questionable. They try to make out that Ethiopians have a mean IQ of 63. Now I could believe that they have a somewhat lower IQ than the world average but 63? With that IQ most Ethopians would not be able to walk in a straight line let alone talk. Rubbish.

There are plently of well-argued critiques of Lynn and Vanhannen such as:

http://www.gnxp.com/MT2/archives/001463.html
http://www.dienekes.com/blog/archives/000440.html
(note that Buj's data is radically different to Lynn and Vanhannen's further questioning the usefulness of the data)

Iran regularly places above most "white" countries in maths and physics competitions (these demonstrate mathematics and verbal reasoning skills which are two of the three key components of most IQ tests). Take a look atthis which discusses Iran's impressive performance. If you look at the US team, it includes many Jews and Asians - the Iranian team doesn't have any.

As for Iranian inventions, discoveries and other firsts, these include the building of the first Suez Canal, imperial organisation, windmills, trousers/pants, algorithms, algebra, the discoveries of alcohol, sulphuric acid, meningitis, asthma, smallpox and a whole host of other diseases, fuzzy logic and the gas laser. The Iranian calendar is significantly more accurate than the Gregorian. An Iranian physicist (Afshar) has recently made a ground-breaking contribution to quantum mechanics. There are many others. I'm sorry but a lot of Nordic countries can't even begin to compare (and many of Europe and the US's geniuses have been Jews).

And Iranians are supposed to be less intellgent than Iraqis or Turks let alone Europeans? Give me a break. In my opinion, there is very small variation in intelligence between all Caucasoids and Mongoloids (5%), Negroids are somewhat less intelligent and Australoids more so still (this is based on a comparison of brain size).



Actually, people are noticing. Many European companies (Mercedes, Renault, Nokia) are investing. In fact, Iranian FDI per capita is higher than China's. There is quite a long way to go but the Iranian economy is becoming a force to be reckoned with. We're doing quite a bit better than many of the "Asian Tiger" economies. You're believing the propaganda that Israel and the US are churning out.



That was tongue and cheek. It was in response to Fredrik's pathetic attempt to piss off Shapur by trying to argue that he preferred Thais to Iranians. So I simply replied that if you like them so much, why don't you invite them If you read some of his comments, Fredrik comes out looking like the Trojan Horse not me. Shapur said that Germans marrying Thais at the current rate will make Germany significantly Mongoloid in a few decades. Instead of being perturbed at a trend that should be disturbing to any WN, Fredrik preferred to attack Shapur. Who is the infiltrator? I, who openly admits I'm Iranian, or Fredrik who paints himself as the WN?

IQ tests are not everything. However, some groups including Iranians will substantially improve their performance on them with exposure to education, whereas Congoids will show relatively little improvement.
That aside, I think its pretty revealing that Fredrick has confessed he perfers Thai women to Irtanian ones, no matter how Aryan their appearance.
The mere idea that I could ever prefer any East Asian to my beautiful 100% Aryan Iranian /Irish WN gf makes me want to vomit, and I have no hostility towards East Asians as long as they stay in Asia.
Its been my experience that many of these :Nordish" (Not to be confused with Nordic) WNs have a claset East Asian fetish. Hry if a chick gets you hard, you can't control that, But to say you prefer an East Asian to a White?

diablo

diablo

[diabloblanco92]

Originally Posted by Cloud S

Keep grafting these black eyed darkies in with Southern Europeans, and I'm sure that'll lead other suspicious Europeans to accept Mediterraneans with open arms. As if Italy and Greece didn't have to face enough issues concerning racial purity...

They don't, unless you are referring to the recent influxes of mud immigrants.

diablo

[diabloblanco92]

Originally Posted by Cloud S

Keep grafting these black eyed darkies in with Southern Europeans, and I'm sure that'll lead other suspicious Europeans to accept Mediterraneans with open arms. As if Italy and Greece didn't have to face enough issues concerning racial purity...

Your comment makes no sense anyhow, i do not have black eyes, mine are dark brown. My "Camel Jockey" gf has light brown ones. If anything , by your standards, I am polluting her rather than other way around. LOL

diablo

[Mike Jahn]

Originally Posted by Jim Crowe

Miss Costa Rica looks white to me, or not enough admixture to quibble about


Miss Dominican Republic is not white, but certainly not even close to a boolie.


I think it's silly to make an issue of these two:




Whether Sivan Klein (Miss Israel) is white or not, I wouldn't kick her out of bed.

You wouldn't kick your Grandma out of bed.