Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old July 23rd, 2012 #1401
Heather Blue
Senior Member
 
Heather Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,984
Default

Evidently, Con. Ron Paul made his last plea to audit the Fed. They say the bill will pass in the House, but die in the Senate. If those Senators thought they might face a lynch mob I bet they would pass it. Some people need to feel a little fear to make them do the right thing.

Ben Bernanke seemed smugly sure of himself as he sat looking at Congressman Paul. I don't think he would do so much smirking if the founding people of this country understood the Jews need the Federal Reserve Bank to finance our genocide.

In spite of their programming the Jewish Race could not do one thing to the White Race without a gigantic amount of money, lots and lots and lots of money. There are so many different methods to carrying out a genocide and millions of non-whites to pay off.
__________________
The birth of every white baby is the First Born of the next generation.
"Segregation did not exist to hold back other races. It existed to protect us from them." D. Roof
 
Old July 23rd, 2012 #1402
Heather Blue
Senior Member
 
Heather Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,984
Default

Sorry for the double posts.
__________________
The birth of every white baby is the First Born of the next generation.
"Segregation did not exist to hold back other races. It existed to protect us from them." D. Roof
 
Old July 31st, 2012 #1403
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

The role of Jewish converts to Catholicism in changing traditional Catholic teachings on Jews
Kevin MacDonald on July 31, 2012 — 16 Comments

In a previous article, “Benzion Netanyahu: Jewish Activist and Intellectual Apologist,” I discussed the activities of New Christian intellectuals in 15th-century Spain in developing an interpretation of Christianity and Judaism in which Judaism was presented very positively:

These intellectuals presented Jews as a genetically separate religious group composed of morally superior individuals and distinguished by a superior genetic heritage. On this basis, the New Christians argued that they were therefore worthy of being the progenitors of Christ who was born a Jew. (This appeals to Christians who naturally want to believe that Jesus came from a superior genetic stock.) The basic strategy was to realize that Christianity could serve as a perfectly viable ideology in which Christian Jews could retain their ethnic solidarity, but with a Christian religious veneer.

What I didn’t point out was that some of the the main New Christian apologists, such as Alonso de Cartagena (whose writings are discussed in Chapter 7 of Separation and Its Discontents, p. 210ff), were not only converts from Judaism but also held high positions within the Catholic Church—obviously an ideal position from which alter Christian theology about Judaism. They were quite successful, at least temporarily:

As has undoubtedly often been the case in other eras (see, e.g., the discussion of the Dreyfus case in Chapter 6), the [New Christian] apologists were intellectually far more sophisticated than their opponents, and collectively they dominated the literature of the period. … Their arguments, while necessarily departing from orthodox Christian arguments in their defense of the Jews, are presented in a highly literate, scholarly style that undoubtedly commanded respect from an educated audience. They were highly skilled in developing the very intricate, tortured arguments necessary to overcome the existing anti-Jewish bias of Christian theology. The result of all this intellectual activity was a stunning, if temporary, victory over the Toledo rebels of 1449 … . The rebels were soon regarded by the public as moral, religious, and political renegades; they were excommunicated by the pope, and their leaders were imprisoned and executed. (p. 212)

A new book by John Connelly, a professor of history at the University of California-Berkeley, shows a similar phenomenon in the 20th century: converted Jews were instrumental in creating the Vatican II document Nostra Aetate which changed the historic position of the Catholic Church toward the Jews (“Converts Who Changed the Church: Jewish-Born Clerics Helped Push Vatican II Reforms“). As with their New Christian predecessors, the technique was to find passages of Scripture that conformed to their ethnic interests in raising the status of Judaism yet remaining within the intellectual confines of Catholicism:

Nostra Aetate confirmed that Christ, his mother and the apostles were Jews, and that the church had its origin in the Old Testament. It denied that the Jews may be held collectively responsible for Jesus Christ’s death, and decried all forms of hatred, including anti-Semitism. Citing the Letter of St. Paul to the Romans, Nostra Aetate called the Jews “most beloved” by God. These words … staged a revolution in Catholic teaching.

From the Jewish point of view, a revolution was highly desirable. The article on Judaism in The Catholic Encyclopedia from 1910 — during the papacy of Pius X (who is highly regarded by traditionalist Catholics)— is instructive. Jews in the time of Jesus are described as a “race” that rejected the call of Jesus for repentance, showing no sorrow for sin, unfit for salvation and rejecting the true kingdom of God in favor of earthly power: “Jesus justly treated as vain the hopes of His Jewish contemporaries that they should become masters of the world in the event of a conflict with Rome.” These views, including the view that Jews are a “race” can be traced back to Christian intellectuals such as Eusebius in the 4th century (see here, p. 106).

[After the resurrection of Jesus,] the Church … took the independent attitude which it has maintained ever since. Conscious of their Divine mission, its leaders boldly charged the Jewish rulers with the death of Jesus, and freely “taught and preached Christ Jesus”, disregarding the threats and injunctions of men whom they considered as in mad revolt against God and His Christ (Acts 4). (Catholic Encyclopedia, 1910)

The article portrays Church laws against Jews, such as laws against Jews having Christian slaves and forcing Jews to live in ghettos, as necessary to protect the Christian faith. It accurately portrays the Church in later centuries as at times protecting Jews against popular anti-Jewish actions. However, it asserts that the causes of popular anti-Semitism included real conflicts between Jews and non-Jews that are not explained as being due to Christian religious ideology that the Jews murdered God. In particular, the causes of anti-Semitism are described as follows:
The deep and wide racial difference between Jews and Christians which was, moreover, emphasized by the ritual and dietary laws of Talmudic Judaism;
the mutual religious antipathy which prompted the Jewish masses to look upon the Christians as idolaters, and the Christians to regard the Jews as the murderersof the Divine Saviour of mankind, and to believe readily the accusation of the use of Christian blood in the celebration of the; Jewish Passover, the desecration of the Holy Eucharist, etc.;
the trade rivalry which caused Christians to accuse the Jews of sharp practice, and to resent their clipping of the coinage, their usury, etc.;
the patriotic susceptibilities of the particular nations in the midst of which the Jews have usually formed a foreign element, and to the respective interests of which their devotion has not always been beyond suspicion.

These ideas on the causes of popular anti-Semitism are pretty much the same as the ones I emphasize in my overview of historical anti-Semitism.

As with the New Christian intellectuals of the 15th century, the converted Jews who influenced Vatican II managed to attain the intellectual high ground. Connelly:

The problem was, they had possessed no language of their own with which to break the silence. More than most academic disciplines, theology is a complex thicket with each branch guarded by a prickly coterie of experts. Those wanting to grasp the complexities of the church’s relations to Jews had to study eschatology, soteriology, patristics, Old and New Testament, and church history through all its periods. The bishops thus found themselves relying on tiny groups of experts who had cared enough to amass the unusual intellectual qualifications for this task. … The thinkers who did the intellectual work that prepared this revolution were overwhelmingly converts.

As is typical of Jewish intellectual movements, there was a great deal of cooperation among the converts. During the 1930s, converts—the most important of whom was Johannes Oesterreicher—opposed Catholic theologians who argued that Jews were “racially damaged” (a belief quite consistent with the views of The Catholic Encyclopedia mentioned above). Instead, they claimed that Jews “carried a special holiness.”

Although the rise of National Socialism increased the urgency of such movements among Jews, there was a similar attempt at the First Vatican Council, in 1870.

The brothers Lémann — Jews who had become Catholics and priests — presented a draft declaration on relations between the church and Jews, stating that Jews “are always very dear to God” because of their fathers and because Christ has issued from them “according to the flesh.”

A basic argument by the converts was to stress Christian universalism: “In their opposition, they were simply holding their church to its own universalism.”

It’s fascinating that de Cartegena’s argument also boiled down to holding the Church to its own universalism. ”If you really believe in a universalist Christianity where nothing matters except religious belief, then you shouldn’t be upset if a subset of former Jews [i.e., the New Christians] continues to marry among themselves and retains its ethnic coherence, as long as their beliefs are sincere” (see above link).

Again we see the fundamental weakness of the ideology of Western universalism when in competition with a group that rejects a similar ethic.

In conceptualizing the motivation of these Jewish converts, Connelly asks:

What were the impulses behind their engagement after the war? … In Oesterreicher we see an enduring solidarity with the community that once was his, most immediately his family. In 1946 he pondered the fate of his father, who had died of pneumonia in Theresienstad…. Intense love and longing for his Jewish father began opening Oesterreicher’s mind to the possibility that Jews could be saved as Jews.

Well, maybe. But Connelly doesn’t even attempt to make this argument for the other converts, and in any case it’s impossible to discount a lingering sense of ethnic solidarity that goes well beyond filial affection. (Connelly also mentions a bizarre psychoanalytic argument in Peter Gordon’s review in The New Republic.)

From an evolutionary perspective, the Jews who over the centuries have become priests and bishops while advancing Jewish interests are examples of altruism on behalf of their ethnic group. By becoming Catholic clergy they would typically forego marriage and family. But their behavior as insiders in an institution that historically had been generally negative toward Judaism shows that they may nevertheless advance the interests of their ethnic group without personally reproducing.
 
Old August 4th, 2012 #1404
Heather Blue
Senior Member
 
Heather Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,984
Default

I've been watching the TV series "The Borgias." Grusome story, but well acted by Jeremey Irons.

It has been suggested that Alexander VI was one of those Jews from Spain who converted to Christianity to keep from being expelled by Queen Isabella.

Jews corrupt everything. Everything.

The American people don't understand the Jews corrupted our Finance and our economy. Every person who is unemployed or working at minimum wage has no idea it is because the economy has been corrupted by Jews. The economy lies in ruins in the western world because of the Jews.

Jews want all the money.

The money Jews make off pornography is staggering. Most likely homosexuality is a money making industry. The abortion mills is a money maker as well as an excellent way to eradicate future "anti Semites."

But the ordinary man can't get that through his head, especially a Catholic. The Church has taken a disastrous turn since Vatican II which was probably istigated by "inside" Jews. Try pointing out the truth about another race and a Catholic is instantly on guard, his mind too indoctrinated to realize that - although he is good man - he has been trained to resist hearing the truth. The Jews have not only invaded the Church, but they are mind invaders.
__________________
The birth of every white baby is the First Born of the next generation.
"Segregation did not exist to hold back other races. It existed to protect us from them." D. Roof
 
Old August 6th, 2012 #1405
Heather Blue
Senior Member
 
Heather Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,984
Default

I wonder how much damage has been done to the United States since Obama has been in the White House. It probably won't take long to find out. People don't like what is going on, but everybody seems to be waiting for somebody else to do something. We need laws and policies, but the Israeli puppets in Washington won’t do anything.

Men are beginning to talk about a New Right - whatever that is. Hopefully, it’s something meaningful. Don’t know, yet.

Actually, if I could do what I would like in a dream I would issue an executive order for all illegal aliens to leave the country ASAP. The military would be dispatched to assist them to the border. We would even put those who need it on planes and fly them back to their home countries, providing they are not Europeans. Anchor babies would not be American citizens. They would be citizens of the countries where their parents, grandparents and great grandparents were born.

The next group would be those with the "green" (is it green, anymore?) cards. Time's up, freeloaders. No more money. No more free anything. America is in a crisis and all hand-outs and freebies are suspended. Non white University students - finish your education elsewhere like Israel, Somalia, India, the Congo, China, etc., You will get an education you could never get in the USA.

Non-white doctors, college professors, engineers....sorry, but white professionals are in demand from now on. We prefer health care providers, educators and dam builders who like us. Better yet, go to Israel. Since the idea of coming to the Unites States for sugar plums came from the Jew master minds (not us), go to Israel. All those millions and millions who came here to rip us off and take our heritage go to Israel instead. Israel is the center of the universe to the Jews. Go to them with your pipe dreams. Blacks, Hispanics, Orientals run, skip, hop and jump to the land of Israel. Take Israeli jobs, become teachers, get social services and hands outs, help yourselves to Israeli political correctness, civil rights, fairness, equality, fair housing, affirmative action, integrated schools, become millionaire sports figures, TV anchors, politicians, film stars, drug dealers, pornography peddlers - go and get the Israeli Dream. It only stands to reason that since Jews are the master minds of all these things then Israel is the place to make your dreams come true. Heck, we’ll even pay your way. We'll help you pack and see you off. Go feast on the Israeli Dream.

As for white liberals...they will have plenty of time to write their sob stories from jail cells. Traitors will have the chance to find out how the gallows work. Men who sexually molest little kids will repent of their sins before firing squads. Parents who mistreat their children will be able to appreciate cracking concrete blocks every day. Those who would sell their defeseless children will get tax paid sterilizations.

Alas, we do not live in a dream world. Dreams want quick fixes. But even a dream does not underestimate the value of force.
__________________
The birth of every white baby is the First Born of the next generation.
"Segregation did not exist to hold back other races. It existed to protect us from them." D. Roof

Last edited by Heather Blue; August 6th, 2012 at 01:03 AM.
 
Old August 9th, 2012 #1406
Heather Blue
Senior Member
 
Heather Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,984
Default

If Jesus didn't exist who was that man? Certainly not a Jew.
__________________
The birth of every white baby is the First Born of the next generation.
"Segregation did not exist to hold back other races. It existed to protect us from them." D. Roof
 
Old August 16th, 2012 #1407
Heather Blue
Senior Member
 
Heather Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,984
Default

It seems to me the Intellectual Community is too principled to slug it out with the Jews and their stooges. They have enormous information and those with courage put it out there for our benefit, but these gentlemen do not have the ruthlessness to fight with bare knuckles for white survival. Believe me, it will take bare knuckles to save the white race.

Too many things are thrown at us. The people hardly know which way to turn or what to think. There is no leadership that can be trusted. The liberals are bold, pushy and wrong. The conservatives are cultured, upper class wimps. Both take their political positions very seriously as if they are supremely important. Why should the ordinary American be impressed with those galoots? Both groups have sold out middle America.

It's the American people who are important. It's the working class, the neighborhood small business, the farmer, the plumber, the coal miner, the waitress, the housewife, the parents and their children.... That's what's important. Not being a liberal or conservative....

Nor are "jobs" the biggie of the biggies. It's the survival of the White Race and our civilization. The real issue is the welfare of the founding people and everything we have created and built. This country is ours. This civilization is ours. We founded it, settled it and built it. The real issue is us and the civilization we built out of a wilderness. Without the every day kind of white people there would be no civilization to squabble over. There wouldn’t be anything for anybody to rip off. That makes white people the important ones… their welfare, their needs, their wants.

Have you noticed that every time anybody tries to discuss the concerns of the silenced majority he gets accused of prejudice and called a bigot, or Nazi, or racist, or white supremacist? Both the liberals and conservatives sneer as if they are above such ignorant intolerance.

If the white majority is so super unimportant why are all the demands made on us? That’s right. The demands are made on us. Every demand in the world is made on white people. Not Jews. Or Blacks. Or Asians. Or Hispanics…. Just the irrelevant, unimportant white Americans.

I watched Rick Santorum on cable today. It was a speech he made at a meeting of young conservatives at the George Washington University in July. He asked "what is an American?" He said his father came to America and when he stepped foot on American soil he said he was an American. Santorum said that was what being American was. Meaning, of course, that any jack ass who sets his foot on American soil is an American. Not exactly. My ancestors were among the pioneers. Generation after generation built America. My loyalty is to the founding people, those who did the work, sacrificed and suffered to build a great nation. Santorum’s loyalty is to his personal interests. Who does Santorum think he is to set himself up as our leader?
__________________
The birth of every white baby is the First Born of the next generation.
"Segregation did not exist to hold back other races. It existed to protect us from them." D. Roof

Last edited by Heather Blue; August 16th, 2012 at 09:40 PM.
 
Old August 16th, 2012 #1408
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heather Blue View Post
If Jesus didn't exist who was that man? Certainly not a Jew.
Arguing from the premise under dispute is a logical fallacy called begging the question.

The fallacy of petitio principii, or "begging the question", is committed "when a proposition which requires proof is assumed without proof"...

Begging_the_question Begging_the_question
 
Old August 16th, 2012 #1409
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heather Blue View Post
It seems to me the Intellectual Community is too principled to slug it out with the Jews and their stooges. They have enormous information and those with courage put it out there for our benefit, but these gentlemen do not have the ruthlessness to fight with bare knuckles for white survival. Believe me, it will take bare knuckles to save the white race.

Too many things are thrown at us. The people hardly know which way to turn or what to think. There is no leadership that can be trusted. The liberals are bold, pushy and wrong. The conservatives are cultured, upper class wimps. Both take their political positions very seriously as if they are supremely important. Why should the ordinary American be impressed with those galoots? Both groups have sold out middle America.

It's the American people who are important. It's the working class, the neighborhood small business, the farmer, the plumber, the coal miner, the waitress, the housewife, the parents and their children.... That's what's important. Not being a liberal or conservative....

Nor are "jobs" the biggie of the biggies. It's the survival of the White Race and our civilization. The real issue is the welfare of the founding people and everything we have created and built. This country is ours. This civilization is ours. We founded it, settled it and built it. The real issue is us and the civilization we built out of a wilderness. Without the every day kind of white people there would be no civilization to squabble over. There wouldn’t be anything for anybody to rip off. That makes white people the important ones… their welfare, their needs, their wants.

Have you noticed that every time anybody tries to discuss the concerns of the silenced majority he gets accused of prejudice and called a bigot, or Nazi, or racist, or white supremacist? Both the liberals and conservatives sneer as if they are above such ignorant intolerance.
Yes, I've noticed that. But what I've noticed more is that these attacks work. The 'accused' back off. The professional conservatives write a thousand articles about the effectiveness of 'racist!' wearing off, but I've
never observed that in my lifetime.

We have people who don't even understand what verbal fighting is, let alone know how to do it, and I'm talking about the most formally educated among us. Men who use jew-coined/-promoted agitprop terms like 'racism' and 'anti-semitism' and 'holocaust' just like they were normal words, and reserve their smears for those who contest them. My god, if you're not going to fight with actual fists, the least you can do is contest verbally.

Quote:
If the white majority is so super unimportant why are all the demands made on us? That’s right. The demands are made on us. Every demand in the world is made on white people. Not Jews. Or Blacks. Or Asians. Or Hispanics…. Just the irrelevant, unimportant white Americans.
The white majority is to carry the weight and take the abuse. Because they are a guilty race that can't be trusted.

Until they decide otherwise. It is self-evident that christ-insanity greatly eases this brainwashing because it teaches people to respect authority, feel guilty, and love everybody indiscriminately since we are all god's children.

Quote:
I watched Rick Santorum on cable today. It was a speech he made at a meeting of young conservatives at the George Washington University in July. He asked "what is an American?" He said his father came to America and when he stepped foot on American soil he said he was an American. Santorum said that was what being American was. Meaning, of course, that any jack ass who sets his foot on American soil is an American. Not exactly. My ancestors were among the pioneers. Generation after generation built America. My loyalty is to the founding people, those who did the work, sacrificed and suffered to build a great nation. Santorum’s loyalty is to his personal interests. Who does Santorum think he is to set himself up as our leader?
America is a blood-and-soil nation like any other, but as soon as jews acceded to power they had the definition changed so that today even the fools known as conservatives claim we are a 'proposition' nation.
 
Old August 16th, 2012 #1410
Jimmy Marr
Moderator
 
Jimmy Marr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Jew S. A.
Posts: 3,679
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
We have people who don't even understand what verbal fighting is, let alone know how to do it, and I'm talking about the most formally educated among us. Men who use jew-coined/-promoted agitprop terms like 'racism' and 'anti-semitism' and 'holocaust' just like they were normal words, and reserve their smears for those who contest them. My god, if you're not going to fight with actual fists, the least you can do is contest verbally.
Easy for you to say, Silver Tongue.
 
Old August 17th, 2012 #1411
Heather Blue
Senior Member
 
Heather Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,984
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
Arguing from the premise under dispute is a logical fallacy called begging the question.

The fallacy of petitio principii, or "begging the question", is committed "when a proposition which requires proof is assumed without proof"...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question
Doesn't truth exist? Christ was called truth in the flesh. We can't see it, feel it or taste it, but truth does exist. (And lies.) We can't prove the existence of Christ or disprove it. If Jews were not efficient obliterators I would be highly concerned with the lack of evidence, but their history strongly suggests that many small clusters of culture building people were wiped out without leaving a trace. If entire groups can be wiped out, why not an individual?

Personally, I believe Jesus Christ is who He said He was and I believe He loves me.

You are on a bandwagon against Christianity. Most atheists are not. But most atheists don’t have a great mind like yours. Down the road, I worry a little about the Mind Influencers trivializing, down-playing Alex Linder's knowledge and intelligence to the gullible Christian Community. Linder was not a Christian. Linder did not even believe in God. Planting that seed is all it would take to undermine your credibility. And you are too smart not to know Jews would do exactly that.

You see things, understand things, write things that are honest and bluntly truthful, not because of any religious motivation, but because you are highly intelligent and naturally honest. But the majority of people need to have a little bonding persuasion like religious beliefs. Faith unifies them in a common cause. Jews are messing around with those religious beliefs. Which is why our intellectuals are disgusted with Christians. Jesus was an intellectual, too. He called these people sheep. He also expressed disgust. He would explain something as plain as the noses on their face and they still had trouble understanding.

This is a fact of life. We have got to deal with it. Somehow.
__________________
The birth of every white baby is the First Born of the next generation.
"Segregation did not exist to hold back other races. It existed to protect us from them." D. Roof

Last edited by Heather Blue; August 17th, 2012 at 10:33 PM.
 
Old August 17th, 2012 #1412
Steven L. Akins
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heather Blue View Post
Doesn't truth exist? Christ was called truth in the flesh. We can't see it, feel it or taste it, but truth does exist. (And lies.) We can't prove the existence of Christ or disprove it. If Jews were not excellent obliterators I would be highly concerned with the lack of evidence, but their history strongly suggests that many small clusters of culture building people were wiped out without leaving a trace. If entire groups can be wiped out, why not an individual?

Personally, I believe Jesus Christ is who He said He was and I believe He loves me.

You are on a bandwagon against Christianity. Most atheists are not. But most atheists don’t have a great mind like yours. I worry a little about the Mind Influencers trivializing, downing-playing Alex Linder's knowledge and intelligence to the gullible Christian Community. Linder was not a Christian. Linder did not even believe in God. Planting that seed is all it would take to undermine your credibility. And you are too smart not to know Jews would do exactly that.

You see things, understand things, write things that are honest and bluntly truthful, not because of any religious motivation, but because you are highly intelligent and naturally honest. But the majority of people need to have a little bonding persuasion like religious beliefs. Faith unifies them in a common cause. Jews are messing around with those religious beliefs. Which is why our intellectuals are disgusted with Christians. Jesus was an intellectual, too. He called these people sheep. He also expressed disgust. He would explain something as plain as the noses on their face and they still had trouble understanding.

This is a fact of life. We have got to deal with it. Somehow.
"Quid est veritas?"
 
Old August 24th, 2012 #1413
Heather Blue
Senior Member
 
Heather Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,984
Default

After the last Presidential election I was surprised with how non-white groups voted for Obama. I guess my surprise was due to the fact I had not thought about it until then. 95% of the Blacks voted for Obama- actually, no surprise there. The rest, Jews, Hispanics, Orientals were in the high 70s voting for Obama. Why did I expect anything different? After all, they are not white. An identity factor? Non-white groups voting for a non-white President because they are not white, either - which is the same as saying they are anti white. (Although I -myself - literally could not stomach John McCain.)

Still, I thought it was outrageous. Everything those mud-sharks get comes from white culture and they go to the polls and vote for a black man! That is insane. Those people are not going to benefit from Obama’s Black Community. Not even the Black Community benefits from the Black Community. These groups get NOTHING from each other.

Jews scream about equality, but for all that we bend over backward for these ethnic groups their countries do not benefit from our sacrifices. If every Hispanic in the country emptied the treasury of the USA how would it solve their problems in Mexico? The same goes for the Chinese, Vietnamese, Koreans, Blacks etc. How does ripping off white Americans solve the problems in their own countries? They don't become loyal Americans.Their loyalty is still to their home countries.

Government welfare programs and Church hand-outs only foster the personal greed of individuals. That's all they do. At the same time these people are 100% anti white and don’t care if we know it. The last election proved that. They flat out voted against us.

Unfailingly, Jews will vote for Jews. (You don't think every Jew in New York City did not vote for Bloomberg for Mayor?)
Asians will vote for Asians
Blacks will vote for Blacks
Hispanics will vote for Hispanics
White Americans will vote for anybody.

What are we thinking? When some other race runs for political office we should be as loyal to our race as they are to theirs and vote "white." When a black man like Obama is running we should unfailingly vote for our own kind.

This is no time for third parties, in my opinion. This is the wrong time for third parties. It's not the time to think about Democrat, Republican, liberalism or conservatism, right wing or left wing, or pro-life or pro-abortion, or pro gay rights or anti gay rights. It’s not about the economy. It's not about the Constitution. Or big false promises. This is strictly about race. The non-white races vs. the White Race.

Mitt Romney will be the candidate over Ron Paul. We know that. Too bad. But Mitt Romney is white. For all I know his Race may well be his only qualification, but he is white and that is what counts! (At least he is not as repulsive as John McCain.) Since we have a white candidate we should get out in massive numbers and vote for him. You think the world would not take notice that the White Race in America is actually taking a stand? That finally, white people are standing up for ourselves? It would get everybody's attention (including Mitt Romney) and scare our enemies. And it would certainly be a shot in the arm for white nations.

We can always replace Mitt Romney with another white man, but our Race is irreplaceable.
__________________
The birth of every white baby is the First Born of the next generation.
"Segregation did not exist to hold back other races. It existed to protect us from them." D. Roof

Last edited by Heather Blue; August 26th, 2012 at 02:23 AM.
 
Old August 29th, 2012 #1414
Heather Blue
Senior Member
 
Heather Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,984
Default

Obviously, white survival is an on-going process. A parasite will always be around to suck our blood. White people can never rest. When we let down our guard and try to enjoy the fruits of our labor here come the blood suckers!

We can blame our laxness on many things, gentlemen, but religious distortion is only one of them. Jews have distorted every religion white people had. This is a never ending problem.

I can see why some men think ridding ourselves of our religion would be one less thing, a very powerful thing, the Jews could monkey with, but atheism never brought people together and never will. Europe (perhaps not so much Russia and eastern Europe) is going through a form of atheism or lack of belief in a deity. The idea of a divine person like Jesus Christ seems to be ridiculous if not laughable. But look at present day Europe. Dumping our cultural religion has created a void that the Muslims are filling up while the non-Christian blood suckers (so-call globalists) are in control of our national governments and finance.

In my opinion no religion is to blame for the existence of parasites. These vermin will be around forever, apparently. Just like lice that plague dogs. We eradicate them one body at a time. However, we (church leadership) can be blamed for allowing the parasites to persuade us that feeding them and sustaining them is what Christianity is about. That is not the way it is supposed to be. This leads to over populating the earth and in order to save herself Mother Nature is turning on her favorite children. Jesus gave a commandment against feeding these dogs…King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.) "Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you." (Diversity is certainly trampling us under their feet.)

Jesus was not on the side of vermin. Nor multiculturalism. Luke 8: 30 And Jesus asked him, saying, What is thy name? And he said, Legion: because many devils (diversity) were entered into him. 31And they (the demons) besought Him that He would not command them to go out into the deep. 32And there was a herd of many swine feeding on the mountain: and they besought Him that He would suffer them to enter into them. And He suffered them. 33Then went the devils out of the man, and entered into the swine: and the herd ran violently down a steep place into the lake, and were choked.

Multiculturalism is legion. We are being over-taken by demons, millions of them. Vermin. Lice. Parasites. Blood-suckers. Jews.

Eradicating this plague is an on-going process. We must overcome them one era at a time. We can never rest. We can never let our guard down. We can never let them defeat us. We can never be so stupid as to think we are safe from this plague.
__________________
The birth of every white baby is the First Born of the next generation.
"Segregation did not exist to hold back other races. It existed to protect us from them." D. Roof
 
Old September 3rd, 2012 #1415
Heather Blue
Senior Member
 
Heather Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,984
Default

I’ve never seen so much hatred for white people as media convey these days. It seems to grow more vicious by the hour. The boldness with which the Jews expose their hatred for us is shocking.

It's somewhat of a mystery why White Authority has never done one thing about the MSHM (Main Stream Hate Media.) White Nationalists have pointed out that Jews control the media; they have presented a list of media CEO's, but never actually took steps to clean up this serpent’s nest. White Authority could justifiably declare the anti white media unconstitutional and kick them out.

Hate media are not exactly what the Founding Fathers had in mind for America when they stipulated a free press. There's nothing free about it. The MSHM are hostile, anti white and used to foster racial hatred against innocent people. White people have no control at all. That makes the main stream media strictly unconstitutional.

It’s nervy to accuse white people of hate and racism when we have no way of venting this hatred. Our so-called hate is awfully silent, isn’t it? The Internet provides free speech, but it does not have the power of the main stream media. Nor do white people use the Internet to lie about other races. We stick to the facts.

So, why do Jews beat the drums about our so-called hate and racism when they know we have no MSHM to express it?
__________________
The birth of every white baby is the First Born of the next generation.
"Segregation did not exist to hold back other races. It existed to protect us from them." D. Roof
 
Old September 4th, 2012 #1416
Heather Blue
Senior Member
 
Heather Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,984
Default

It's like a courtroom drama. The Jew's whole case against us is "hate." Except for the small fact we do not hate anybody - all beside the point, of course. They are dragging us through the courts (the main stream hate media) determined to have us executed for hate crimes we never committed.

First of all, we were not around when hate came birthing.
We do not have the means (media)to spread hatred.
We had no motives.
We had no plans.
We had no weapons.
We drew no blood.
No one died from white hatred.

The American Indians did not die because of white racial hatred.
The Blacks are not dying because of white racial hatred.
The Asians are not dying because of white racial hatred.
The Hispanics are not dying because of white racial hatred.
The Jews are not dying because of white anti semitic hatred.

That's beside the point. Whites are guilty, anyway. Why? Because the Jews say so!

The MSHM point their fingers at us and jump up and down screaming hate, hate, hate.

You are guilty you white SOBs! If we - the Jews - say you hate, you hate. Can’t you understand that, you unbigoted white bigots! You unbiased white racists! You tolerant white Intolerants.

The Jews have themselves a mighty unfounded hate case. The whole world shakes with it.
__________________
The birth of every white baby is the First Born of the next generation.
"Segregation did not exist to hold back other races. It existed to protect us from them." D. Roof

Last edited by Heather Blue; September 4th, 2012 at 03:06 PM.
 
Old September 5th, 2012 #1417
Heather Blue
Senior Member
 
Heather Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,984
Default

It was a state of desperation when the MSHM picked on a Latino security guard as a white murderer that shot a Black teen in Florida. If Whites had a decent number of White-on-Black crime the MSHM would not need to scrape the bottom of the barrel trying to build their case against the White Community.

Whites, you see, have not swallowed the MSHM's story that a "white" Latino shot an innocent, unarmed black kid. First of all, Whites do not view Latinos as white. Neither do the Latinos. The main stream hate media (MSHM) plugged away at it, anyway. In their anxiety to paint white people as evil racists the Jews went off the deep end on that one and almost got the hapless Latino killed by crazed blacks. (Indeed, the majority of white people are still not buying that tale.)

Jews can go back in history and try to pin us with racial crimes. It’s hard to prove things that far back although we do not seem to question where Jews got all that so-called information about us. We might doubt the veracity of these alleged atrocities, but don't really know for sure… after all, how many people except a handful of curious minded researchers will go to the trouble of looking for the truth? (Jews just hate those damnable scientific minded whites.) So far, they have discovered that Jews committed most of those crimes. Like the slave trade.

The MSHM jump up and down with joy when there is the slightest hint of racial overtones in an incident involving a white man, or High School kids joking around with a noose. Naturally, we notice the huge disparity and point out heinous Black on White crimes...all worse than anything white people do. But Jews are not building a case against the non-white communities. That's why the MSHM only briefly mention Black crimes and/or ignore them altogether. The MSHM’s case is strictly against Whites. They go to extraordinary lengths to present it to the non-white community - like prosecutors to a jury - to convince them of our guilt and make them their willing executioners. Even Farrakhn who understands the Jews better than most blacks is primed to start a race war with white people.

It helps when false witnesses help out. Stooges like Chris Matthews, Rachel Maddows and other weasels raging like maniacs, cowardly Conservatives, Hollywood film actors pussy footing around for that big salary and, of course, the Queer Community who resent not being normal.
__________________
The birth of every white baby is the First Born of the next generation.
"Segregation did not exist to hold back other races. It existed to protect us from them." D. Roof
 
Old September 12th, 2012 #1418
Heather Blue
Senior Member
 
Heather Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,984
Default

I don't know if the Jews are creating a hostility against Presidential Candidate, Mitt Romney, which influences some of my friends against him because he is rich or if there is beginning to be a backlash against the wealthy class in America. I hope it is a backlash against the wealthy. They certainly do not lift a hand to keep "cheap" labor out of this country. They want cheap labor.

I am somewhat disturbed that people who resent Romney because of his wealth may not vote at all, and that is a vote for Obama. Every non-white in America is going to vote for Obama and if we don't vote for Romney for whatever reason we will be stuck with Obama and his Jewish handlers for another four disastrous years.

That does not mean I have more than an inkling of faith in Romney. It‘s his whiteness I have faith in (I am not even a Republican.) I don't have faith in rich men, period. They don't give a fig about me, so why should I place blind trust in them? Romney will probably act in the interest of his rich buddies just like George Bush - except Romney is not an alcoholic like Bush. But this strange circumstance of a Negro setting his African carcass in the White House turns my stomach. He does not belong there. Not all the nauseating jargon about "fairness, rights and quality" justifies this racial blight on a white nation.

Sometimes, I am perfectly astounded by the attitudes of people. How can rich men be so short sighted? Don’t they know they are assisting white genocide and destroying the future of their own descendants? (Well, Christ did say something about "the love of money is the root of all evil.")

Why are the politicians not lifting a hand to get rid of the Federal Reserve banking system that's ruining our economy, making slaves out of the ordinary working people and indoctrinating the masses with their demonic propaganda. And what on earth is the Church doing breaking immigration laws, wasting our money on feeding over-breeding non-whites and making Christianity a dirty word?

Has the entire western world gone crazy?
__________________
The birth of every white baby is the First Born of the next generation.
"Segregation did not exist to hold back other races. It existed to protect us from them." D. Roof

Last edited by Heather Blue; September 12th, 2012 at 11:04 AM.
 
Old September 19th, 2012 #1419
Heather Blue
Senior Member
 
Heather Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,984
Default

Media are making such a fuss about Mitt Romney saying that 47% of the people did not pay taxes. He also said about 47% of the people were not going to vote for him. I guess that was the same as saying free loaders are not going to vote for him. I'm pretty sure the majority of them are not white.

Then CNN showed some resentful Black woman saying she was 67 years old and had worked and paid taxes all her life. (Blacks are always resentful if they think there is a threat to the welfare system.)

I don't think Romney was talking about senior citizens who had worked and paid taxes all their lives. I think he was talking about people getting something they never paid into. Like going to the bank and cashing checks on somebody else's account. Let's face it that sort of thing is normal procedure for non-whites.

I believe in some government assistance - for white people. There are some white individuals who - for whatever reason - have been unable to pay into the system. But their parents probably paid into the system and their grandparents and other assorted relatives. Indeed, their white ancestors are the ones who built this cotton pickin' country. In my opinion, needy white people are entitled. They are the heirs.

If 47% of the voters are people-of-color and not going to vote for a white man I hope that 53% of voters are white and voting white.
__________________
The birth of every white baby is the First Born of the next generation.
"Segregation did not exist to hold back other races. It existed to protect us from them." D. Roof
 
Old September 19th, 2012 #1420
Steven L. Akins
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heather Blue View Post
Media are making such a fuss about Mitt Romney saying that 47% of the people did not pay taxes. He also said about 47% of the people were not going to vote for him. I guess that was the same as saying free loaders are not going to vote for him. I'm pretty sure the majority of them are not white.

Then CNN showed some resentful Black woman saying she was 67 years old and had worked and paid taxes all her life. (Blacks are always resentful if they think there is a threat to the welfare system.)

I don't think Romney was talking about senior citizens who had worked and paid taxes all their lives. I think he was talking about people getting something they never paid into. Like going to the bank and cashing checks on somebody else's account. Let's face it that sort of thing is normal procedure for non-whites.

I believe in some government assistance - for white people. There are some white individuals who - for whatever reason - have been unable to pay into the system. But their parents probably paid into the system and their grandparents and other assorted relatives. Indeed, their white ancestors are the ones who built this cotton pickin' country. In my opinion, needy white people are entitled. They are the heirs.

If 47% of the voters are people-of-color and not going to vote for a white man I hope that 53% of voters are white and voting white.
I'm White, but I won't be voting for him. I won't be voting for the nigger either. Both are sorry choices, neither one is better than the other - a nigger and a sellout. I didn't vote last time either for the same reason.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:58 AM.
Page generated in 0.19102 seconds.