Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old September 23rd, 2005 #21
SyTH88
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Liberty Lobbies White Paper.

Find a copy of the liberty lobbies White Paper on the ADL it is most interesting and well documented.
 
Old September 23rd, 2005 #22
Amalekite
Retrosexual
 
Amalekite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The New Jerusalem
Posts: 799
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SyTH88
Find a copy of the liberty lobbies White Paper on the ADL it is most interesting and well documented.
Is that Willis Carto's Liberty Lobby? Do you mean the transcript of the deposition Mark Lane got from an ADL director that you can buy from Noontide Press?
__________________
"A safe rule where Jewish propaganda is concerned is to multiply or divide their figures by ten, at least, before accepting them as the basis for discussion."
- Arnold Leese, from the December, 1937 edition of The Fascist.
 
Old September 23rd, 2005 #23
SyTH88
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amalekite
Is that Willis Carto's Liberty Lobby? Do you mean the transcript of the deposition Mark Lane got from an ADL director that you can buy from Noontide Press?

http://www.beyond-the-illusion.com/f...on_the_adl.txt

ftp://ftp.netcom.com/pub/SF/SFA/gov/ADL-Whitepaper

White Paper on the ADL

FOREIGN AGENTS CONTROL YOUR GOVERNMENT

(Spotlight Reprint from August 10, 1981)

Dual Loyalists Work Against U.S. Interests

Liberty Lobby has always advocated a policy of America first in
foreign affairs and this has made it the enemy of every alien
interest which wishes to manipulate the power of the United States
for its own selfish purposes -- purposes not often noble and never
in this nation's interests.

Thus, Liberty Lobby has been the butt of a sustained smear campaign
by the media designed to intimidate potential supporters -- to
frighten them off for fear of a similar fate.

The main organization orchestrating this malicious barrage of hate
has been the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B'nai B'rith, and the
purpose of this white paper is to analyze the purpose and methods of
the ADL.

This laudable (not to mention courageous) task becomes all the more
important at this time when America stands a hair's-breath away from
nuclear war and the ADL is the main culprit leading us into that
holocaust.

Liberty Lobby deeply resents the fact that America is literally an
occupied nation, held in subjection by a foreign government which
has seized control of its policy-making apparatus -- a once-great
nation without the will to resist or to act independently when the
interests of this other nation are involved.

It is the purpose of Liberty Lobby to acquaint enough Americans with
these facts to cause a political upheaval -- an upheaval which is
clearly on the way simply because the facts are so vivid that they
can no longer be hidden.

Liberty Lobby urges all readers of this white paper to personally
contact their congressman and senators to discuss the facts
presented below and to demand that the allegations be either
confirmed or denied by official investigation. If the ADL is --
as we state -- an unregistered agent of a foreign power then the
parties responsible must be indicted and tried for felony violation
of American law.

Congress can do no less than investigate these serious charges and
you have the right and obligation to be sure that it does.


Background

Most Americans have probably never heard of the Anti-Defamation
League of B'nai B'rith (ADL). Many of those who have heard of it
(including some of its own naive supporters) regard it as nothing
more than another in the vast herd of organizations that claim to be
promoting brotherhood. Only those who have paid attention to what
the ADL is actually doing have a real conception of its nature.

The ADL was founded in 1913 by the B'nai B'rith (Sons of the
Covenant), a Jewish fraternal organization dating back to 1843. The
B'nai B'rith has always publicly represented its own activities as
essentially charitable. It is tax-exempt and contributions are
tax-deductible. Its creature, the ADL, was allegedly intended to
act as a counterforce to anti-Jewish sentiment in the United States.
Originally it appeared that the ADL was to be nothing more than a
publicity organ of the B'nai B'rith whose purpose was to combat
religious prejudice against, and unflattering stereotyping of, the
growing number of Jewish immigrants in the United States.

It quickly became clear that the ADL had taken to itself a more
ambitious role. It would have not only a positive propaganda
function; it would also have a "monitoring" or espionage function,
along with a suppressive, censoring function whose goal was to
prevent anything being heard, read, or seen which was opposed by
those who control the ADL.

Additionally, the scope of the ADL's protection of the Jews against
defamation was defined to include the encouragement of political and
social programs and attitudes which would help the Jews (most of
whom were arriving from Eastern Europe and were perceived as people
of distinctly alien race, tongue, beliefs, and customs) gain more
and more power, status, prosperity, and influence. Because the Jews
on the whole were "outsiders" working their way up -- as were other
immigrants -- the ADL took a stance that was harshly opposed to
people who already "belonged," as well as to their opinions,
religions, traditions, heroes, institutions, clubs, jokes,
scientific theories, and everything else which tended to bind
together and stabilize the already-established Americans into a
relatively homogeneous cultural and social whole.


Secret Report

There was an effort to make the ADL's efforts appear more
altruistic, and to disguise their true thrust, by creating the
appearance of working on behalf of all minorities, for brotherhood
in general. A recent proof that such a scheme was consciously
contrived by the ADL is found n a secret report entitled "The
Proposed B'nai B'rith- Anti-Defamation League Operations in Latin
America," written in 1965 by Arnold Forster, who for many years was
general counsel of the ADL. Depicting Latin America as a kind of
new frontier for development by the ADL, and lamenting only that
Latin America Jews are not more unified and more aware of the threat
of anti-Semitism, Forster writes on page 46:

(Many elements in the Jewish community are convinced "things are
good." These people have closed their eyes for many years to
existing anti-Semitism, hoping that by doing so it will go away.
This group is fearful that public action designed to counter
anti-Jewish hostility will "stir things up." They are reluctant to
"make waves," attracting attention to themselves. The only way
these Jews will be persuaded to join defense efforts is to "dress
up" programs with the problems of other ethnic groups, camouflaging
the fight for the Jewish minority in an across-the-board fight for
all minorities.)

Liberty Lobby has a full copy of this amazing blueprint for
expansion into South America by exploiting and intensifying social
problems.

If resentment arose among the established Americans (most of whom
were of Northern European descent), then it would be ascribed to
selfishness and prejudice; a strong sense of guilt must be
inculcated in those who felt the natural responses of pride and
self-defense even as the ADL and other Jewish groups worked to
increase Jewish pride. If anybody criticized the ADL or the aims
and people it supported, then he was an anti-Semite and a danger to
democracy. If anybody opposed legislation that would take money,
power, or privileges away fro the established Americans and give
them to unestablished Americans, he was somebody to be shunned and
humiliated on account of his greed and bigotry. Even those who
manifested simple patriotism and pride of heritage were ridiculed as
"nativists" or attacked as dangerous fanatics.

"Nationalism" became a dirty word in the ADL dictionary because of
its connotation of white cohesion. Meanwhile the ADL always dealt
sympathetically with any ideology -- socialism, communism,
internationalism -- which promised to break down the existing
leadership of society.

That was during the first half of this century. And then came
political Zionism -- no longer just a dream of returning all Jews to
a single nation of their own, but instead an active process by which
Palestine was to be seized by Jews from its Arab owners and turned
into a super-nationalistic state with an official religion, to be
populated by Jews from all over the world and supported
patriotically and financially by those who did not actually go there.

What was bad in America was fine in Israel, as far as the ADL was
concerned. America needed a "pluralistic" (that is, accommodating
every race, religion, and culture) society, while Israel had a
monolithic society. America needed a total separation of church and
state (no displays of Christmas trees or crosses on public grounds,
and no prayers in public schools), while Israel was inseparable from
Judaism.

The ADL became the instrument of a foreign power following the
Zionist policy of terrorism and aggression in Palestine which
resulted in the foundation of Israel. ADL leaders are constantly
traveling to and from Israel and have frequent communications with
Israeli diplomatic personnel in the United States. ADL
publications, such as the "ADL Bulletin" and "Facts," are largely
devoted to Israeli and Zionist matters. The energy of the ADL is
largely focused on stifling criticism of Israel in this country by
labeling such criticism "anti-Semitism" and seeking the ruin of any
politician or private citizen who dares to say anything against
Zionism or Israeli interests.


34 Americans Killed

After Israel's planes knowingly attacked the American ship, "USS
Liberty," and killed 34 American sailors, the ADL boasted about its
success in covering up and distorting the truth about the atrocity.
When Liberty Lobby's daily radio program, "This is Liberty Lobby,"
reported on Israeli military attacks on the Arabs, the ADL called
the program anti-Semitic and bigoted and undertook a long and
viscous campaign of lies, threats, and economic intimidation to get
the program off the air.

As all members of Congress know, more than one man of politics has
been consigned to private life because he was less than adoring of
Israel, or even because he admitted that there is such a thing as a
Zionist lobby or a Zionist influence on the American press -- an
influence which, less than incidentally, is felt mainly through the
ADL.

More ominously still, it now appears that Zionist influence in this
country is spearheaded by the Israeli secret service, the Mossad,
and that the ADL and the openly terrorist Jewish Defense League
(JDL) are orchestrated by the Mossad. The ADL maintains a pose of
opposition to violence, while the JDL, openly flying the Israeli
flag within this country, screams for blood and makes physical
assaults on its victims. The same man who loses his job or is
denied an office because of the ADL is liable to be beaten up or
shot by the JDL. The ADL and the JDL are two horns of the same
beast.


Methods

According to Joseph P. Kamp, Arnold Forster, the long-time general
counsel of the ADL, was arrested many years ago for painting
swastikas on a synagogue. Much more recently, the Associated Press
reported that Irving Rubin, West Coast leader of the JDL, was booked
for investigation of using an explosive device in the bombing of the
Beth Sar Shalom Religious Center in North Hollywood.

This apparently incongruous behavior points up the important fact
that the ADL (and the JDL) must have anti-Semitism in order to
exist, and they will create the appearance of it if they cannot find
it growing in the wild. Zionism is in fact founded on the Zionist's
acceptance of anti-Semitism as a natural and unavoidable phenomenon
which can be ended only by the movement of Jews to their own
homeland. (Herzl, "The Jewish States: An Attempt at a Modern
Solution of the Jewish Question," 1943, pp. 19-20; Hertzberg, ed.,
"The Zionist idea," 1966, p. 49.) As long as most Jews show no
inclination to migrate to Israel, the fear of anti-Semitism whipped
up by the ADL serves the second useful purpose of garnering
tremendous financial and political support for Israel among Jews
in America and elsewhere.

The scope of the ADL's propaganda efforts would be impossible to
detail in a short space. The ADL line is planted in everything from
comic books to textbooks, "true confessions" magazines to Christian
religious publications. The television series, "Holocaust," was
basically an ADL creation and was accomplished by a great outpouring
of ADL-orchestrated publicity and a barrage of study guides for use
in schools and churches. The same is true, to a lesser extent, of
the series "Masada." Without even going into the historical
inaccuracies of the two films, their messages can be summed up
easily:

1. The Israelis were (are) nicer than all other humans.
2. Jews always are persecuted by unappreciative "gentiles."
3. Israel is Jewish property.
4. Israel is the only hope for Jewish survival.


Words and Images

To purvey its propaganda the ADL has machined a special set of
verbal tools for its unique purposes, just as did the communists,
for whom "democracy" means communism and "liquidate" means murder.
The ADL vocabulary is designed to make the ADL and its clients look
wonderful while making its victims and enemies seem abhorrent. The
process begins with the creation of two contrasting images -- one of
innocence, kindliness, intelligence, and tolerance, and another as
an amalgam of disease, neurosis, insanity, wild-eyed religious
fanaticism, mindless hatred, torture, and mass murder, most
typically in the form of pogroms medieval and modern.

We have all seen the movies, the novels, the comics, the plays, the
"musicals," the comedians, the well-tutored teachers, and the
endless torrent of television programs which create those
ADL-desired images.


Love and Hate

The lines are drawn as clearly as at any Saturday-night professional
wrestling match where the handsome, cleancut athlete in the white
cowboy hat confronts the grotesque, slavering mound of blubber that
will attempt to annihilate him. The crowds love and hate the images
even before the battle of good and evil begins, and once it is
established who deserves to be obliterated, the same brutal cheating
that draws boos when originated by the monster brings screams of
delight when used by the good guy.

The ADL places itself and those it represents in the angelic realm
of Good. Those who oppose it or displease it are consigned to the
demonic kingdom of Evil. The military invasions of the Good are
righteous wars of self-defense. Everybody else's wars are wars of
aggression. The tortures and prison-murders of the Good are
interrogations and accidents. The napalming of civilians and the
wiping out of whole villages are "retaliations" or inspiring
military victories if carried out by the Good, and deeds of infamy
to be memorialized 'ad nauseum' if inflicted by the Evil.

When the ADL spreads lies about somebody it is "sharing information
about the truth nature" of its victim. If the lies are about an
employee, the employer is cautioned about "the effect on community
good-will of your keeping such an individual on your payroll after
you have been made aware of his true nature." A politician or
businessman who is threatened with blackmail if he doesn't fall in
line is being "sensitized to Jewish concerns."

The expression of views disliked by the ADL is a "spewing forth of
bigotry and hate." Such views are "filth," "garbage," "obscene," a
"threat to American democracy," and constitute "pollution of the
airwaves." Such views "are not legitimate fare," and "have no place
on the log of a reputable broadcaster." Certain opinions (i.e.,
those opposed by the ADL) are not within the constitutional
protection of freedom of speech.


The Chameleon Anti-Semitism

The most favored and most devastating terms in the ADL's arsenal are
"anti-Semitism" and its variants. There is, of course, nothing
worse than anti-Semitism. It is the greatest evil in the history of
the world, and it always "lurks just below the surface of Western
civilization ready to burst forth in a new orgy of horror." Just
why it should lurk there -- or even what it is -- is rarely
discussed, but all good folk must be "ever watchful for its
slightest manifestation," and put before all else their efforts to
stuff it back under the topsoil when it tries to break out. It is a
"deadly virus" which must, along with its carriers, be dealt with
like an outbreak of typhoid.

Likewise vague, and purposely so, is what constitutes anti-Semitism.
It is a wide net that catches many fish. Even a Jew who says the
wrong thing -- such as Saul Joftes, for many years an officer of the
B'nai B'rith, who said that Israel was controlling the ADL and the
B'nai B'rith -- is called an anti-Semite. He is also a "sick
individual" who has deteriorated as a result of "severe emotional
problems."

In order to make criticism of Zionism ineradicably disreputable,
the ADL says that anybody other than a Zionist who uses the word
"Zionist" is really using a code-word for Jew. Therefore any
criticism of Zionism (including Israel, of course), is irrational
and obscene and demonic, not to mention anti-Semitic. Furthermore,
any criticism of Israel or the ADL is invariably reported by the ADL
as "an attack on Israel [or the ADL] and on all Jews," even though
there has been no reference direct or indirect to Jews.

And no discussion of ADL vocabulary would be complete without
mentioning the word for all seasons -- "canard." A canard is a
false or unfounded story, and any allegation or report which the ADL
does not like is simply dubbed a "canard" and thus disposed of for
all time without the need for analysis or discussion.

It can be seen that to the ADL language is not so much a means of
communication as a means of obfuscation, and that words are used to
mislead, to put the truth out of focus, and to avoid confronting
real issues.


The ADL Attempts to Stifle Freedom of Speech

From the earliest years of its history, the ADL has revealed itself
to be a self-anointed censor of what should reach the public
consciousness in America. One of its main fields of activity is the
suppression of views it does not want heard, and, as such, it is the
avowed enemy of freedom of speech.

The favored method, where it is feasible, is called "quarantine."
It simply means that a person or group subject to quarantine is
never heard of and never heard from. What he says and does is not
reported (except to the ADL), and what he writes is not published.
If he is engaged to speak by a club or college or broadcasting
station, the ADL sees to it that the speech never takes place.
The sponsoring entity is subjected to telephone calls, threatening
letters, and visits by delegations of local ADL and B'nai B'rith
supporters.

If quarantine works, then its victim is rendered, for all practical
purposes, voiceless and unable to exert influence except in the most
restricted sphere. He is not even attacked. He is a non-person.

The concept of quarantine is quite openly discussed in ADL circles
as an alternative to actively slandering its enemies. The
Washington "Star" of February 10, 1965 reported that Herman
Edelsberg, director of the ADL's Washington office, said that
members of the "radical right" who could not be persuaded to change
their views to conform with the ADL's dogmas should be dealt with by
"keeping them in quarantine, until, from tedium, they drop out."


No Debate

An organization that has been closely linked to the ADL in purpose
and in fundraising, the American Jewish Committee, concluded in
January, 1960, after a five-year study by Dr. Andhil Fineberg, that
an opponent's statements should not be debated because debate would
strengthen the opponent's ability to get attention. Those who know
him should "privately expose him to opinion molders." Presumably
one is exposed if he is called a hatemonger and an anti-Semite in
the right private quarters. It may be, however, that some genuine
dirt can be dug up, in which case a wider audience is desirable:
"... [P]ublicity can be effective where a bigot is concealing facts
about himself." (Quoted in Joseph P. Kamp, "The Bigots Behind the
Swastika Spree," 1960).

A member of the audience at a so-called "Rumor Clinic" presented by
Hyman Haves of the ADL's southern California office on February 1,
1950 in Santa Ana, California, reported some of the speaker's
remarks in this manner:

"Explaining the tactics of the League [ADL], Haves related instances
wherein ADL representatives called on editors and radio station
owners in cities where opponents were scheduled to speak. he told
how these editors and radio station operators were "enlightened and
convinced" to give no publicity to the speakers. He described this
as the "quarantine or silent treatment" and said it was greatly
reducing the audiences of the enemies of the league.

"He said boastfully that many ADL opponents "have been cut down" by
finding some embarrassing or unpleasant happening in their past and
using it against them. Haves said the league found the income of
one particular enemy who paid income tax on only $11,000, to be
actually $32,000, and said the ADL simply gathered the information
and turned it over to the federal government.

"You can call these tactics anything you want to," Haves commented.
"You can even say smear. We prefer to say education."


Silent Treatment Technology

A striking instance of the silent treatment technology is found in a
letter, dated December 13, 1933, written beneath the letterhead of
the Anti-Defamation League, Chicago, Illinois, by Richard E.
Gutstadt, director. The letter begins, "To the Publishers of
Anglo-Jewish Periodicals,"

"Gentlemen:

"Scribner & Sons have just published a book by Madison Grant
entitled "The Conquest of a Continent." It is extremely
antagonistic to Jewish interests. Emphasized throughout is the
"Nordic superiority" theory, and the utter negation of any "melting
pot" philosophy with regard to America.

"We are interested in stifling the sale of this book. We believe
that this can be best accomplished by refusing to be stampeded into
giving it publicity. Every review or public criticism of the book
of this character brings it to the attention of many who would
otherwise know nothing of it. This results in added sales. The
less discussion there is concerning it, the more sales resistance
will be created.

"We therefore appeal to you to refrain from comment on this book,
which will undoubtedly be brought to your attention sooner or later.
It is our conviction that a general compliance with this request
will sound the warning to other publishing houses against engaging
in this type of venture."


Iron Curtain Over America

In 1955 ADL National Chairman Henry Schultz wrote on ADL stationary
to Lt.-Gen. George E. Stratemeyer, complaining that the
distinguished general had written a letter endorsing John O. Beaty's
book, "Iron Curtain Over America," "and recommending it to Americans
in general." Schultz then went on to educate Gen. Stratemeyer about
the book's author:

"Professor Beaty is no newcomer to the field of anti-Jewish
propaganda. As long ago as 1948 he was delivering anti-Semitic
lectures in the Southwest."

Until the publication of "Iron Curtain Over America," Beaty was
"irritating only in a local sense." Now he was nationally known,
and something had to be done about it. (Exactly what Prof. Beaty had
said that was so objectionable was not revealed, of course, and the
ADL did not "propose to burden" the general "at this point with our
detailed analysis of the book...")

The ADL's muscle man then put on the twist in typical heavyhanded,
oblique fashion:

"In view of the foregoing, it is our feeling that you may want to
consider the advisability of some publication which can assure the
American people, who hold you in such high regard, that you
repudiate religious hatred, as we know you do, and the use of your
name by Professor Beaty..."

The renowned Air Force general responded, "I forcefully resent what
you have said or implied," and stated, "I do not consider that book
anti-Jewish in any sense of the word." He continued:

"When the United States of America reaches the point where a citizen
cannot read what he desires to read and to recommend such reading to
others then we will have reached the status that exists in Soviet
Russia... As I interpret your letter, your organization would have
the people read only what you think should be read and recommended
to others. This I resent as a free American citizen.

"I do not understand what you mean by your statement, "we do not
propose to burden you at this point, etc." Is this a veiled threat
to my free expression and thoughts? If so, this I also resent.

"Your letter is the most outrageous communication I have ever
received in my life and I intend to give it the widest possible
publicity, including my many Jewish friends."

A somewhat similar incident occurred in 1959, when Gen. Ulysses S.
Grant III caused an article called "Abraham Lincoln and the
Rothschilds" to be distributed to members of the Military Order of
the Loyal Legion of the United States. Herman Edelsberg of the
Washington, D.C. office of the ADL wrote an insulting letter to Gen.
Grant on June 19, 1959, claiming that he had lent his name "to a
vile anti-Semitic canard" and "the fabrication of a warped mind."
Edelsberg dwelt in an uncomplimentary manner upon the alleged
history of the article and its distributors, of course, rather than
upon the factual content of the piece, which had to do with the role
of international bankers in the American Civil War. Edelsberg
ordered the general to "speedily and fully repudiate" the
publication.

Gen. Grant replied indignantly with a defense of the historical
accuracy of the article, and pointed out that it was only Edelsberg
and the ADL who had given it "the anti-Jewish twist."

"What "the international bankers" of Europe did a century ago to
help the Confederacy cannot by any reasonable person be considered a
reflection on the many, many good Americans who are Jews, and your
efforts to make it seem so is difficult to understand."

The ADL pressure continued, with great play in the newspapers --
which tended, as is usually the case with newspapers, to adopt the
ADL's language as their own and to describe the article flatly as
"anti-Semitic." There was much debate over whether the general had
"apologized," but the apology was also an ADL fantasy, and the
general never abandoned his guns.
 
Old September 23rd, 2005 #24
SyTH88
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Congressman Gets Treatment

Congressman John G. Schmitz of California received the same kind of
treatment in the summer of 1972, after he had written an
introduction and endorsement to "None Dare Call It Conspiracy," by
Gary Allen. Mr. Allen, like the author of Gen. Grant's article,
had spoken of "international bankers." Harvey Schechter of the ADL
sent a letter to Congressman Schmitz.

"We were distressed to read your introduction to and endorsement of
"None Dare Call It Conspiracy" by Gary Allen, and we hereby call
upon you to withdraw your endorsement and repudiate this
anti-Semitic propaganda book."

Congressman Schmitz published the ADL letter along with his own
reply in the "Congressional Record" of June 19, 1972. He wrote to
Schechter that Schechter's attack on him because of "None Dare Call
It Conspiracy" was "one of the most remarkable confirmations of the
book's thesis that I have seen," in that Gary Allen had stated that
the ADL was used "as an instrument to try to convince everyone that
any mention of the Rothschilds or their allies is an attack on all
Jews."

Quoting from the book, Congressman Schmitz continued:

"Any individual book exploring this subject is immediately attacked
by hundreds of ADL committees all over the country. The ADL has
never let truth or logic interfere with its highly professional
smear jobs. When no evidence is apparent, the ADL, which staunchly
opposed so-called 'McCarthyism,' accuses people of being 'latent
anti-Semites'."

"There is not a word in Gary Allen's book which could possibly be
construed by any reasonable man as an attack on any religious faith."

Among its other efforts on behalf of American democracy, the ADL
attempted to get the Federal Communications Commission to prevent
telephone companies from permitting the purveyors of certain ideas
from using their recorded message services. The group the ADL had
specifically in mind had denounced the Peace Corps and (according to
the ADL) called up "lurid visions of a 'communist conspiracy'
lurking behind" various groups, including (surprise!) the ADL.
(Washington "Post," Sept. 9, 1965.) A few years later the Supreme
Court eventually thwarted a prolonged ADL effort to make the FCC
take away the license of a radio station which had broadcast an
"appeal to prejudice." The ADL had refused a proffered opportunity
to broadcast a reply:

"A reply, said attorneys for the Jewish service organization, only
focuses more attention upon a racial or religious slur, lending it
more dignity."

The same policy is no doubt useful if one just can't think of a good
answer.


This is Liberty Lobby

The longest and most intense campaign waged by the ADL against a
specific group in many years is its continuing war to have the radio
program, "This is Liberty Lobby," removed from the airwaves. The
ADL's enmity to Liberty Lobby stemmed originally from its general
enmity to all nationalist, "rightist" elements in America. The
ever-increasing importance of Israel in the ADL program, running up
against Liberty Lobby's outspoken advocacy of United States
neutrality in the Middle East, as elsewhere abroad, precipitated the
ADL "counteraction," as the instigators euphemistically called it.

The entire matter is documented by materials, such as internal ADL
letters and memoranda, uncovered during a subsequent lawsuit brought
by Liberty Lobby. The whole effort was carefully planned,
organized, and coordinated at the ADL's national headquarters in New
York. Inquiries by Israeli officials in the United States played an
important, and perhaps the leading role, in getting the
counteraction underway. Not surprisingly, some of the Israeli-ADL
correspondence is missing from the materials the ADL was forced to
produce during the Liberty Lobby lawsuit, and the one letter that
got through was reproduced so poorly that most of it is illegible.
It is from the ADL, Boston, to the Israeli Consulate in Boston, and
is dated December 24, 1973. The letter begins: "I appreciate your
calling my attention to Liberty Lobby broadcast on [station call
letters illegible], Boston." The letter continues for two more
paragraphs, almost entirely illegible, beginning with the words,
"I believe that you are aware of the fact that Liberty Lobby is..."
The words "editorial" and "bumper stickers" appear, giving clues of
the general trend of the discussion. Copies of the letter were sent
to at least eight individuals, most or all of them ADL professional
staff.


Form Letters

Soon radio stations began receiving phone calls and letters of
complaint from local people, most of whom (the radio station
personnel reported) had apparently never heard the Liberty Lobby
program. The letters were almost always parrot renditions of
language from ADL "kits" mailed out from New York to regional
offices.

Packets of "information" about Liberty Lobby were sent to radio
stations, and there was an attempt to create the impression that
numerous spontaneous complaints were being received about the
program by the ADL offices. Advertisers susceptible to ADL and
B'nai B'rith influence threatened to withdraw, and in some cases
actually did withdraw, their business from stations which would not
cancel the Liberty Lobby broadcasts.

Meanwhile, as is easily proved by a review of the scripts that were
used, there was nothing even remotely anti-Semitic or similarly
objectionable in the "This is Liberty Lobby" broadcasts, although
there were occasionally comments on Israel. In a letter of December
3, 1973, the chairman of a western broadcasting company wrote to
Sheldon Steinhauser of ADL's Denver office referring to complaints
about the Liberty Lobby program:

"I must, however, in all candor say that upon listening to these
programs I have never heard anything which could be classified as an
attack upon the Jewish faith or our citizens of that national origin.

"It is a rather abrasive attack upon foreign policy in the Near
East. It is not, in my opinion, at all different from any other
highly controversial opinion, hence we have no intention of
censoring it."


Courageous Broadcaster

On January 16, 1975, an attorney from the Washington, D.C. law firm
of Koteen & Burt, representing station WVOX, New Rochelle, New York,
wrote to one Donald Flamm, who passed the letter on to the ADL.

"Particularly over the course of the last year or so, a great deal
of pressure has been brought to bear upon WVOX... by various people
and organizations in an attempt to force it to drop "Liberty
Lobby"... During the course of various inquiries about this program,
I have reviewed numerous scripts to determine, among other things,
whether it is being used as a vehicle for attacking various people
and groups and whether, therefore, various requirements of the
Federal Communications Commission's Fairness Doctrine come into
play. In no instance that has come to my attention have I found
anything which is even superficially anti-Semitic."

The attorney went on to say that a New York "Times" reporter who had
done a story on the program had found nothing anti-Semitic in it,
and that the station president, Bill O'Shaughnessy, "has become
satisfied that those who actually bother to listen to the program
have not found it to be anti-Semitic." The lawyer stated that the
American Civil Liberties Union believed that attempts to remove the
program from the air "represent a classic example of attempts to
suppress freedom of speech."

All broadcasters were not as courageous as O'Shaughnessy, who
refused to buckle even though he was favored with menacing letters
from ADL general counsel Arnold Forster personally. According to an
ADL memorandum, Howard Warshaw, president of Universal Broadcasting
Company, New York, after having met with ADL staff and having been
warned by them that "This is Liberty Lobby" was "anti-Semitic,"
ordered the general manager of WTHE (Mineola, Long Island) to listen
to all Liberty Lobby programs in advance and to discuss any
"questionable" material with him. If any tape contained "the kind
of anti-Semitic material contained in the specimens we reviewed"
(i.e. criticisms of Israel and of potential U.S. involvement in a
Middle East war) they would be pre-empted, or an older tape played.

The memo, from Mel Cooperman to Harry Rosenkranz, January 10, 1974,
concluded:

"By the way, WTHE has carried, and will continue to carry every ADL
"Report from Israel" program we send them, as they have for six
years."

On April 23, 1974, the ADL's Monroe Schlactus wrote to ADL's
"director of domestic fact-finding," Irwin Suall, that he had been
told that Howard Warshaw of Long Island "has begun to be most
cooperative in killing the tapes even before we express concern."
It happened that Warshaw also owned station KUXL in Schlactus'
Minnesota territory:

"I would imagine that through Mel's contact with Warshaw, we may be
able to preview all the Liberty Lobby tapes before their airing."

A memorandum from Isadore Zack to Herman Brown, with copies to
various ADL higher-ups, spread the following good news:

"I understand from Sherm Keller of WRYT-Boston that his boss, Ken
Carter, plans to audition the Liberty Lobby tapes before putting
them on the air and will not use any program that mentions Israel in
a derogatory way. I am alerting our monitors to check this out."


Liberty Lobby Makes Comeback

The massive ADL "counteraction" (fully documented in official
documents procured through legal process) did result by 1975 in the
loss of many stations and the cancellation by the Mutual Network of
its contract with Liberty Lobby to carry the program. This reduced
the total number of stations to 106. However, in spite of
continuing ADL pressure, today (June, 1981) the program is carried
on 470 stations, most of them as a free public service. The
program's point of view today is identical to what it was in 1975,
which should say something about the increasing public acceptance of
Liberty Lobby's pro-American outlook.

In Liberty Lobby's files there is also documentary evidence that ADL
agents have contacted advertisers in order to prevent them from
placing ads in Liberty Lobby publications, and that ADL agents seek
out contributors to Liberty Lobby and pay visits to their homes.
Even advertising agencies are put on the griddle:

"For the record, I have received information that there is an
advertising agency in Los Angeles which is handling the placing of
Liberty Lobby's radio program on radio stations nationally... I have
asked Harvey Schechter to undertake an investigation of this agency.

-- Memorandum from Irwin Suall (director of ADL's "Domestic
Fact-finding Department") to Justin Finger, February 14, 1974.

"Talent" is not immune from persecution, either: The same Harvey
Schechter (of the ADL's Los Angeles regional office) who was to
investigate Liberty Lobby's advertising agency was also hot on the
trail of the famous announcer who introduced Liberty Lobby's radio
programs. Schechter wrote to Maxwell Greenberg on July 30, 1974:

"I for one, am distressed at the fact that Liberty Lobby broadcasts
begin with an opening comment by Harry von Zell... In view of his
key position with Home Savings and Loan and the gutter anti-Semitism
of the Liberty Lobby, I would like to suggest that a letter from you
to him about this might further stimulate him to take action to deny
Liberty Lobby the use of his voice."

In an unrelated incident, a radio announcer named Allan E. Augustine
was fired by WOKY, Milwaukee, after the ADL complained that
Augustine had acted irresponsibly in interviewing two nazis on his
talk show.


Union Saves Pilot's Job

A final example of the ADL's tactics shows them at their most vile.
On April 3, 1978, Irwin Suall wrote to the management of Trans World
Airlines (TWA):

"I'm writing at the suggestion of Arnold Forster, who happens to be
abroad at present, concerning Mr. ----, a TWA pilot who has managed
to antagonize a large number of people in New Jersey."

The letter went on to accuse the TWA pilot of writing
letters-to-the-editor which were critical of "Jews, Zionism and
Israel." (In actual fact, the pilot had never criticized Jews. He
had, however, gone so far as to put an ad in a newspaper in which he
placed, according to Suall, "the blame for the deaths in the March
11th PLO raid on the Israelis.")

"It so happens that a number of people apparently know that --- is a
TWA pilot..., ---'s propaganda activities are apparently linked in
their minds with TWA.

"Mr. Foster felt that you would want to be informed about this
matter and asked me, just before he left, to share the information
with you and to convey to you his most cordial regards, I would be
pleased to hear from you."

At last report the pilot still has his job, although thanks more to
his union and the Railroad Labor Act than to his employer, Cases of
this kind come to the light of day only rarely; many a man has
probably been dismissed at the behest of the ADL without ever
knowing the real cause.


Represents A Foreign Nation

No regular reader of the "ADL Bulletin" and other ADL publications
and productions can doubt that the ADL's primary concern is the
artificial nation of Israel. The welfare of Israel is put above all
else, certainly including the United States. Visits to the United
States by Israeli generals and politicians are given front-page
coverage in such reverential tones as are reserved by Catholic
newspapers for visits of the pope. The pronouncements of Israeli
leaders are published with obbligatos of adulation -- except for a
couple of times when Prime Minister Menachem Begin went so far in
his cheerleading for Jewish influence in the U.S., and in his open
calls for the Jewish lobby to get what Israel wanted, that the ADL
feared people would realize that he was proving what the
"anti-Semites" had been saying all along.

The ADL tries to put the best appearances on everything Israel does,
while the United States is judged as good or bad depending on the
extent of its support for Israel. The same goes for other
countries: The Soviet Union was enormously popular with Zionists
until it interfered with emigration of Soviet Jews to Israel. The
Soviet Union then became a wicked and anti-Semitic country, and the
U.S. was expected to dump ice on its d�tente with the Soviets and
prune its foreign policy accordingly. And, of course, the most
glaring example of distortion of American policy for Israel's
benefit appears in the costly hostility of the United States toward
the Arab countries -- a policy totally opposed to America's true
interests and existing entirely because of Israel's long-lasting war
with its neighbors.


Israel the Only Issue

There is one and only issue as far as the ADL is concerned --
Israel. If Israel tries to sink a ship of the United States Navy
and murders 34 Americans in the process, the ADL prides itself on
covering up the facts and explaining them away, while on the other
hand anybody who ever killed an Israeli (even though his country is
at war with Israel) is a despicable terrorist and bloodthirsty
outlaw. A careful distinction is made between those who are able to
kill large numbers of civilians from airplanes (American supplied
airplanes) and those who can afford only to kill smaller numbers on
foot.

The ADL never tires of telling us, and having us told, that because
the population of the Jewish state is made up of an exceptional
people unceasingly persecuted due to some ineradicable flaw in all
non-Jews, the Israelis are exempt from the rules of human behavior
and have a special license to steal other people's real estate, to
kidnap anywhere in the world, to torture, to kill, to lie, to
falsely accuse, and to interfere at will in the politics and social
development of other countries.

To justify and further the programs and aims of Israel is the
primary mission of the ADL. The organization is, of course, at one
with the B'nai B'rith, with its large and highly manageable and
influential system of professional lodges. Especially significant
are those lodges made up of highly placed people in the advertising,
publishing, entertainment, and news fields. It works in alliance
with other groups that comprise the Israel lobby -- such as the
American Jewish Committee, whose Washington representative, Hyman
Bookbinder, boasted in a public speech of the speed with which he
had been able to assemble on the Capitol steps a display of American
congressmen and senators in support of an Israeli government demand.


Sophisticated Intimidation

As contrasted to the Jewish Defense League, which uses physical
intimidation and overt violence while literally parading the Israeli
flag within this country, the ADL deals primarily in propaganda and
moral, political, and financial intimidation. It instigates,
coordinates, places, and often writes, on behalf of Israel the
avalanche of slanted news stories, editorials, magazine articles,
television programs, cartoons, politicians' speeches, entries in the
"Congressional Record," letters, and even motion pictures and
novels, which -- particularly at the time of some Israeli crisis or
extensive Israeli demand on American leaders and taxpayers --
smothers the United States.

Once a rock has been started rolling downhill, one does not have to
keep prodding it or the others it picks up along the way: People
know what is expected of them. If they do not, they will be
"sensitized," or perhaps even tenderized. Event he standup comic
knows that to defy the party line would be professional suicide.
Toward the end of the 1960's the ADL and its cohorts accuse Poland
of "anti-Semitic" acts, (See, for example, entry by the ADL's
congressman, Joshua Eilberg, in the July 16, 1968 "Congressional
Record") and lo, within days the insulting "Polish joke" was born,
pounding home month after month the alleged stupidity of the Polish
people who up to then had been treated as heroic defenders of
freedom. In such ways American attitudes are molded to the benefit
of Israel and to the detriment of any group on Israel's hit list.

The inconvenient fact that what helps Israel usually hurts the
United States is handled by the ADL and similar organizations by the
technique, proof of the intent of which is available in numerous
publicly distributed recordings of their meetings, of trying to make
Israeli interests appear identical to the interests of the United
States and attractive to the American people. "We are a minority
too small to have our desired effect without the help of many
others," goes the reasoning. "we must therefore make other people
identify our interests with theirs, and we must create the illusion
that what is good for us is good for America." By such sleight of
hand, the tiger is led by the monkey, and a great and powerful
nation is made to sacrifice its own welfare for the sake which has
nothing to offer in return except the probability of involvement in
nuclear war.


Foreign Agents Registration Act

The Foreign Agents Registration Act, Title 22 U.S. Code �611 et
seq., provides criminal penalties for failure of propagandists and
others active in this country on behalf of foreigners to file highly
detailed registration statements with the Attorney General, to file
copies of all political propaganda (however disguised or
sugar-coated), and to label all such propaganda conspicuously, and
to keep and reveal records of their activities.

"Political propaganda" is defined by the act to include any
"communication or expression by any person... which is reasonably
adapted to, or which the person disseminating the same believes
will, or which he intends to, prevail upon, indoctrinate, induce, or
in any other way influence a recipient or any section of the public
within the United States with reference to the political or public
interests, policies, or relations of a government of a foreign
country or a foreign political party or with reference to the
foreign policies of the United States..." �611(j).

The same rules apply to "political activities" which in any way
"influence any agency or official of the public within the United
States with reference to formulating, adopting, or changing the
domestic or foreign policies of the United States or with reference
to the political or public interests, policies, or relations of a
government of a foreign country or a foreign political party"
�611 (o).

The Foreign Agents Registration Act is designed to include anyone
"who directly or through any other person" carries on such
activities and who acts as an agent, representative or "in any other
capacity" at the order, request, or under the direction or control,
or under the direct or indirect supervision, direction, control, or
subsidization of a foreign principal �611(b).

'There is absolutely no doubt that the ADL is operating in criminal
violation of the Foreign Agents Registration Act; that its foreign
principals include the government of Israel and its subdivisions,
numerous Israeli Zionist groups such as the World Zionist
Organization and the Jewish Agency and their fundraising branches
within the United States; and that the ADL works in complicity with
large numbers of equally guilty parties in the American
communication media and the political arena.'

It is the job of the U.S. Department of Justice to enforce the
Foreign Agents Registration Act, (*) but while the department has
exerted itself ordering American Protestant ministers to register as
foreign agents because they arranged preaching and a few other
public appearances for some clergymen of the Christian League of
Southern Africa, ('Washington Weekly', Oct. 5, 1978) it has been
curiously paralyzed when it comes to pursuing the ADL and its huge
network of coordinated Israeli agents.

(*) [Title 50, �851-858 contains additional provisions for
registration of foreign agents with the Attorney General. These
sections are applicable to "every person who has knowledge of"
espionage, tactics or terrorism of "a government of a foreign
country..." it stretches the imagination to assume that ADL officers
are not fully aware of the activities of the terrorist organization
known as the Jewish Defense League, an open agent of Israel which
provocatively flies the Israeli flag during its demonstrations
against "enemies of Israel." No one can miss the perfect
orchestration of ADL and JDL activities. It is commonly believed
that both agencies are manipulated by the efficient Israeli
espionage and terrorist are, the Mossad.]


Easy To Document

Documentation of the ADL's actions as an agent of Israel is neither
rare nor difficult to come by. Indeed, it is almost impossible to
encompass its scope in a paper of this length. The examples that
follow are a fair selection from among thousands.

First, there is no question that Israel, which could never have
existed financially, militarily, or otherwise without the constant
support of the United States, wishes to exert all possible influence
on this country and to draw all possible sustenance from it, while
preventing any aid or support by the United States going to
countries on Israel's enemies list, and in particular to the Arab
countries from which Israel hacked out its territory. The World
Zionist Organization and the Jewish Agency are specifically designed
to be the Israeli government's overseas arms. Even though purposely
not made branches of the government, the status, function, and
authority of the WZO and the Jewish Agency are set forth in Israeli
law. Among their goals are to organize Jewish communities outside
Israel to serve Zionist purposes, to spread propaganda, to see that
money is collected (almost always to tax-exempt "charitable"
organizations) and channeled to Israel, to encourage immigration
into Israel, and to influence various governments to formulate
foreign policy to pass laws which favor Israel.

Most of the Israeli aims in the United States are spearheaded by the
ADL, with other Zionist-oriented groups such as the American Jewish
Committee playing important roles. The WZO and the Jewish Agency
keep a low profile, while the ADL poses as an American organization
serving American Jewish aims, though in reality honing its
activities to serve Israel on every point.

When Arab countries organized a boycott of Israel, the ADL openly
led the fight to have anti-boycott legislation passed in the U.S.,
took measures to see that American businesses were trading with
Israel under the anti-boycott laws, and even acted on Israel's
behalf as regarded Japan's cooperation with the Arab boycott.

"The Anti-Defamation League, a Jewish organization, has long been
bothered by the Japanese reaction to the boycott. For years, the
organization has been trying on its own to persuade the Japanese to
change their policy. Now, evidently wearying of these efforts,
Anti-Defamation League officials are seeking the aid of American
corporations." -- The Wall Street Journal, May 13, 1968

On March 4, 1975, the New York Times reported that: "The
Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith has written to President Ford
reporting what it calls a concerted campaign among shipping
companies, aided and abetted by American commercial banks unlawfully
to comply with the Arab boycott regulations against the state of
Israel."

Since 1966, the ADL has produced a radio program called "Dateline
Israel," some 26 new programs each year, broadcast over hundreds of
stations, which consists entirely of Israeli propaganda. Prominent
in the origins and production of "Dateline Israel" was ADL general
counsel Arnold Forster, who was reported in the May, 1974 "ADL
Bulletin" to have been to Israel more than 50 times.


Forster Writes Letters

Forster, among his other achievements on behalf of a foreign state,
wrote seemingly innumerable letters (always published, of course) to
the editors of major newspapers on subjects having exclusively to do
with Israel and the protection or furtherance of Israeli interest.
Every public criticism of Israel was met with a thundering defense.
Every Israeli policy was dolled up as a glamorous boon to American
interests. every hint of cooperation with Arab countries by the
U.S. was depicted as a dark collaboration with the forces of evil.

In 1973 the ADL took out full-page newspaper advertisements whose
message was that Arab oil-producing countries were greedy and that
any change in the Mideast policy of the United States that might
please the Arabs would not improve the American oil situation. The
ads were designed to influence public opinion to ignore the obvious
-- that the oil cut-off by the Arabs had been a direct response to
the United States mindlessly and illogically supporting Israel in an
aggressive war against Arab countries.

"Maariv," published in Tel Aviv, Israel, reported (Jan 14, 1969)
that the ADL in the United States had made a study of Arab
"propaganda" against Israel, and had concluded that the center of
export of such propaganda to America was Beirut, Lebanon. Arnold
Forster was in charge of the ADL study.

"Mr. Foster [sic], who is now in Israel as one of the
representatives of the Jewish organizations to the conference called
by the prime minister, said that the Arabs have discovered the best
way to lie is from a distance."

For the ADL, there is obviously one overriding issue -- Israel --
and old allies who don't agree become 'persona non grata'. ADL
Chairman Kenneth Bialkin, in a New York "Times" item (Aug. 19,
1979), said that "some black leaders have become persuaded by new
left propaganda and have taken up with the worst of pro-Arab,
anti-Israeli elements." Bailkin called such blacks "troublemakers."
 
Old September 23rd, 2005 #25
SyTH88
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bigoted Extremists

A couple of years earlier, when black American workers wanted to
comply with the Arab boycott of Israel, the ADL said that a
coalition, including blacks who said they would be the first to lose
their jobs if Arabs withdrew their business, involved "bigoted
extremists" linked to "anti-Semitism" -- a good example of
name-calling when logic would lose the day.

When the executive committee of the B'nai B'rith International
Council met in 1960, the president concluded: "Positive action by
the Jewish communities should be taken to combat Arab League
propaganda," and " a program of counter -- action to deal with the
Arab League should be considered." ("Summary-Minutes, B'nai B'rith
International Council, Executive Committee Meeting January 26-27,
1960, Amsterdam, Netherlands.")

The B'nai B'rith, swearing that it is strictly a religious,
charitable, and welfare organization, has taken an active role in
getting funds from Germany as compensation or reparation to Jews who
claimed to have been unjustly damaged by Hitler's government. A
revealing insight into the procedure is offered by a B'nai B'rith
"Memorandum to Members of the Board of Governors from Maurice
Bisguer" (Feb. 17, 1960): "In accordance with the claims agreement
resulting from West German B'nai B'rith negotiations, the
predominant amount of funds is to be reserved for Israel."

A typical issue of the "ADL Bulletin" would appear to have been
conceived and composed in an Israeli information office. The June,
1980 issue, for example, which happens to contain an uncomplimentary
article about Liberty Lobby, begins with an article by former
Secretary of State Henry Kissinger (who is pictured receiving an
award form the ADL) entitled "The Middle East." With subheads such
as "No Negotiations with PLO," it contains nothing even remotely
displeasing to Israel, and lest we miss its real point, the
following words are emphasized by being printed in a shaded
rectangle: "While in office and after, I never believed and I do not
believe now that the solution to the West Bank problem can be the
creation of a Palestinian state."


Oil Is Menace

Inside the front cover of the same issue is a comment by ADL
national director, Nathan Perlmutter. Leading off with the news
that anti-Semitism, "as we have customarily measured it," has been
declining, he says that the greatest danger "to us" is oil because
nations which want oil from the Arabs are snuggling up to the PLO,
and, "in the hapless balance is Israel."

There follows a long, illustrated article on a trip to Israel by M.
S. Forbes, editor-in-chief of "Forbes" business magazine, a trip
which had been suggested and arranged by the ADL.

"He went at the suggestion of Maxwell E. Greenberg, the
Anti-Defamation League's national chairman, and Abraham H. Foxman,
its associate national director, following a dispute between the ADL
and "Forbes" editors over rejection of a league ad on peace in the
Middle East which had been submitted for the "Forbes" annual Arabic
Middle East edition. ADL felt the ad had been rejected because the
magazine feared offending the Arabs..."

So the ADL officers, suggesting "that a Forbes trip to Israel was
long overdue," met Mr. Forbes in that Middles Eastern nation,
introduced him to the right people in government, the military, and
business, and showed him the country. Mr. Forbes, of course, loved
Israel and the Israeli leaders, on whom he bestowed such accolades
as "sharp, incisive," "perceptive, candid, with good judgments,"
"able, impressive" and "Oh, fabulous." Mr. Forbes likened America
to Israel and had nasty things to say about the PLO.

The next article in the June 1980 "ADL Bulletin" was entitled
"PLO/Khomeini Connection." It dealt with the cordial relations
between the PLO and the ever-unpopular ayatollah, and concluded that
both "share the goal of destroying Israel," and that "to give them
power is to whet their appetites, increasing their lust for
destruction." (Shades of Adolf.)


Vanessa Redgrave's Trouble

The actress Vanessa Redrave narrated a film called "The
Palestinian," which, although few who criticized it has actually
seen it, outraged the ADL because it was reportedly anti-Israel and
contained an interview with the head of the PLO. There were
vigorous efforts to prevent the documentary from being seen in the
U.S., and to ruin Vanessa Redgrave's acting career. Arnold Forster
said on behalf of the ADL that to advocate the overthrow of Israel
was "the ultimate anti-Semitism." Miss Redgrave commented:

"The American public cherishes its right to information and to form
its own opinions. It should not be abrogated into the hands of a
minority of fanatical Zionists who want to destroy the Palestine
Liberation Organizations and lie about its aims." -- Los Angeles
Times, January 18, 1978

In a pitch letter to ADL supporters on November 10, 1975, Dore
Schary listed as examples of the ADL's good work: Suing the U.S. to
thwart the Arab boycott of Israel, exposing the collusion of other
groups with the Arab boycott of Israel, and persuading the Gulf Oil
Company to repudiate and publicly declare that it will never again
repeat a contribution to "the Arab propaganda campaign" against
Israel. Next on the agenda: "The recent vote in the United Nations
attacking Zionism as 'racism'..."

When President Jimmy Carter compared the Palestinian movement (to
return to the farms and homes that had been taken by Israel) to the
U.S. civil rights cause, spokesmen for the ADL called the comparison
"insulting," and "frightening." Arnold Forster exercised his gift
for meaningless semantic smokescreening by calling the PLO "False
revolutionaries" and "murderers" (Washington "Post," Aug. 3. 1979).

On January 9, 1981, the ADL's headquarters publicly distributed,
under the label, "News," a report called "World-Views and Middle
East Policy," by Kenneth Jacobsen, which compared the probable
Middle East policy of the incoming Reagan administration. The
entire discussion centers on the relative benefits to Israel which
would result from the different policies. Carter, the report said,
had seen Third-World nations (read Arabs) as essentially neutral,
and to be won over through "friendly" approaches, which meant that
the "U.S. would downplay Israel as a strategic interest, would see
the Palestinian issue as the central problem in the Middle East, and
would make periodic overtures to the PLO." (Not good.) Reagan, on
the other hand, would bring with him those who would see both the
Soviet threat and an Arab oil threat. (Good.) By convoluted and
illogical arguments, Jacobsen comes to the conclusion that the U.S.
has shown "unnecessary obsequiousness to the Arab world," and that
the best way for America to meet the oil problem is to join more
closely with Israel in its hostility to the Arab nations.

'With this new approach, there will be no hesitancy to support
Israel as clearly America's most reliable ally and to identify
Israel as a strategic asset to the U.S.'

Many more examples could be cited to prove that the ADL, day after
day, year after year, works within the United States as an agent in
the service of a foreign nation. Not only are such political
activities a violation of the Foreign Agents' Registration Act, but
also disqualify the ADL from its tax-exempt status.


Conclusion

A suffocating atmosphere of threat, extortion, blackmail, character
assassination, and falsehood hangs over the activities of the ADL.
It is an atmosphere deliberately poisonous of freedom hangs over the
activities of the ADL. It is an atmosphere deliberately poisonous
of freedom of speech and thought, designedly stifling of the open
exchange of ideas, and contrary to the provisions of the
Constitution and to the most important considerations that motivated
the American revolutionaries to create a new and independent nation
in the first place.

The ADL is alien in concept and subversive in operation. It is
unethical, un-American and illegal. It operates as a thought
police, smearbund, and intimidation mafia using traditional American
institutions and gullible citizens to further the foreign policy
aims of a foreign nation and the political power of political
Zionism and individual Zionists. Its "chutzpah" cannot be excused,
nor can the actions or inaction of Americans who know of its
outrages but, because of fear, fail to fight them. Nothing can be
more important today than to expose and contain this evil force.
Nothing less than the safety of all Americans is at stake today as
irresponsible Zionists play Russian roulette with a world nuclear
holocaust.


----------
[This white paper was distributed to every member of the House of
Representatives and the Senate of the United States on June 1, 1981
in booklet form. Since then it has been sent hundreds of thousands
of Liberty Lobby members and supporters. Demand has grown so fast
that this edition has been prepared for each subscriber to The
SPOTLIGHT. Extra copies of either the booklet edition or the
newsprint edition are available from:
Liberty Lobby, 300 Independence Ave, S.E., Washington D.C., 20003,
1-800-522-6292: NEWSPRINT Edition: $10 per hundred, BOOKLET Edition:
10 copies or more 40� each.]
----------


ftp://ftp.netcom.com/pub/SF/SFA/gov/ADL-Whitepaper
 
Old September 23rd, 2005 #26
Antiochus Epiphanes
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
 
Antiochus Epiphanes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
Default rich jews talk down to Missourians

I'd like to know what Karen Aroesty, Regional Director, St. Louis Regional Office, gets paid per year to spread lies and hate against Gentiles on behalf of the ADL. I would bet that her income is twice that of the Missouri state average. Or more. Hey Karen, we know you read this website all the time, why dont you come on down and tell us what you make? HMMM?
 
Old September 23rd, 2005 #27
Antiochus Epiphanes
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
 
Antiochus Epiphanes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
Default what does ADL do in MO?

according to the ADL here's what it does in Missouri. I hope Missourians will ask themselves whether these Jews are the wonderful "light of the nations" they say that they are, or just a bunch of big city carpetbaggers stirring up trouble where they're not welcome. In quotes I will quote verbatim what the ADL says they're up to in Missouri-- go check for yourselves to see if I misquote them-- and then I will suggest what my interpretation is. Readers are free to make their own decisions.

Quote:
http://www.adl.org/regional/st-louis/default.asp#2

The Missouri/Southern Illinois Regional Office of ADL in Action:
Quote:
June 14, 2004: the Governor signed anti-cross burning legislation (HB 1074) sponsored by House Judiciary Chairman Richard Byrd. ADL gathered the sponsors, formed the broad coalition, and working closely with the leadership of the American Jewish Committee, succeeded in getting the support of every member of the legislature, save one.
ADL helps ban cross lighting, which for 200 years of American history was considered constitutionally protected free speech. Sounds like ADL only favors "civil rights" for Negroes and jews-- not ALL citizens of Missouri including Whites.

Quote:
Also in June, ADL co-sponsored -- with the African Mutual Assistance Association of Missouri, the International Institute and others -- a speech by His Excellency, Mwelwa C. Musambachime, Permanent Representative of Zambia to the United Nations. In recognition of World Refugee Day, the event drew 250 diverse members of the African community in St. Louis, including individuals from Ethiopia, Somalia, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, and Iraq
.

ADL welcomes Nigerians to Missouri? Oh hurrah. That's just great. Great for who? Did Mr Mwelwa Musambachime explain that to the listeners? I wonder.

Quote:
July 1, 2004: the remnants of a destroyed Israeli bus known as the Bus #37 Project from the organization EndWorldTerror.com was on display at St. Louis City Hall. A press conference led by Mayor Francis Slay kicked off the 3-day exhibit of a bombed Israeli commuter bus. During its time in St. Louis, the bus was part of a training done with the FBI and the Joint Terrorism Task Force. The exhibit was also at the Missouri Historical Society, the Creve Coeur Government Center and at Southwest Baptist Church. The project couldn't have been done without support and assistance from representatives of Hadassah, CAMERA, Temple Israel, Bnai Amoona, NCSY, Aish HaTorah and individual donors. The effort illustrated the reality of living in terror. The multi-media exhibit seeks to teach people that they are not powerless in challenging terrorists bent on destroying human lives. It is about removing any shred of legitimacy that these terror groups lay claim to in spite of - or because of - the dead and maimed bodies they leave behind.
ADL which is a bunch of Jews, propagandized for Israel, the Jewish state, which regularly murders Arabs to preserve their racial apartheid state, and in the process enflames the whole Arab-Muslim world to kill Americans. That's just great. Thanks ADL! Just what America needs- more enemies.

Quote:
ADL participated as a member of the Religion Subcommittee of the Diversity Awareness Partnership. The subcommittee is planning for their annual "One Community, Many Faiths" project on November 7, 2004
.

Diversity awareness = Making Whites feel guilty for being White. Brought to you by the Jewish ADL.

Quote:
The Meyer and Marcelle Kranzberg Memorial Scholarships were awarded for Fall, 2004, after finalists nominated by community professionals participated in an interactive session with the Selection Committee. Congratulations to the winners who received $2000 scholarships. Nominations for the 2005 awards will be sought in January, 2005.
ADL hands out chump change to sycophants. Meanwhile Abe Foxman makes $600,000 a year to head up the ADL which is a "nonprofit" organization. Ha!

Quote:
A marvelous time was had by members of ADL's 2004 Steinberg Leadership Institute and regional advisory board members at the 27th Shana Amy Glass National Leadership Conference in Washington, DC in May. Program highlights included Senator John Kerry, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, National Security Advisor Condoleeza Rice, Congressman John Lewis, Marcello Pera, President of the Italian Senate, journalists Gerald Seib (Wall Street Journal), Andy Cohut (Pew Center) and Alexis Siemendinger (National Journal), Israel's Ambassador to the US, Danny Ayalon, Bill Burns, Assistant Secretary of State for Middle Eastern Affairs, and St. Louis's own David Makovsky of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.
ADL arranges meet and greet for American politicians intent on selling out to Israel to curry favor with rich Jewish donors. Did they all have to wear Yarmulkas and spit on crosses, too?

Quote:
Congratulations go to ADL and the Missouri Historical Society, who together mounted an extraordinary group effort to creat a proposal for a new anti-bias program which received full funding from the Institute of Museum and Library Services. The A WORLD OF DIFFERENCE Institute of St. Louis Project for ADL will develop a new curriculum using Museum collections as a source of historic examples of bias, prejudice and discrimination. The new classroom-based program will be tested in five schools in the first year, 10 schools in the second. The final results will produce a curriculum, implementation guides and resource materials that will enable museums to work with regional ADL office nationwide.
ADL tries to make White Missourians feel guilty. Again.

Quote:
ADL was recognized in the summer of 2004 for its work leading the US attorneys Hate Crimes Task Force at the 59th Annual Brotherhood Sisterhood Awards of the National Conference for Community and Justice
What is a hate crime? Where a White criminal receives a heavier sentence than a black criminal, for the same crime. Which, is an obvious denial of equal protection under the Fourteenth amendment-- one of the post civil-war amendments passed to ensure that people would be treated fairly regardless of race.... now, twisted by Jews to mean that Whites must receive MORE punishment than blacks for the same crimes! What a JEWISH idea! Thanks to Jews White Missourians are now treated unfairly, but dont worry, Missourians-- JEWS will spit on your face and tell you it's raining!.

Quote:
ADL continues to work with its partners in the Racial Equity Collaborative, a group formed to address racial disparities in the region around education, housing and economic development. Almost at the end of a year-long planning grant from the Deaconess Foundation, the REC seeks to create a new comprehensive community initiative on the race as discussed in FOCUS's July 2001 "Racial Equality in St. Louis: A Community Call to Action".
The unruly criminally inclined blacks of St Louis will be further used by the Jewish ADL to bully the White population. St Louis, a disaster the ADL wants to bring to other parts of Missouri as well-- maybe Kirksville too!
 
Old September 24th, 2005 #28
Tannhauser
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

ADL as a hate group--they have no, NO, moral authority.
All they know is sheer terror.
 
Old September 26th, 2005 #29
Antiochus Epiphanes
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
 
Antiochus Epiphanes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tannhauser
ADL as a hate group--they have no, NO, moral authority.
All they know is sheer terror.
They dont really terrify me. I think have no charitable purpose and their 501c3 designation should be revoked. I think they should be investigated by Congress for acting as an unregistered foreign agent for Israel. They are un-American, hateful Jews. They should be called the "Defamation League" rather than the "AntiDefamation League" because that is what they're all about.
 
Old September 26th, 2005 #30
Amalekite
Retrosexual
 
Amalekite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The New Jerusalem
Posts: 799
Default

Lenni Brenner's book: Zionism in the Age of the Dictators

Looks like a good source of information, as long as one keeps in mind that it was written by a marxist (Jew).
__________________
"A safe rule where Jewish propaganda is concerned is to multiply or divide their figures by ten, at least, before accepting them as the basis for discussion."
- Arnold Leese, from the December, 1937 edition of The Fascist.
 
Old September 26th, 2005 #31
White Will
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,603
Default No way to victory but over the Jew!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antiochus Epiphanes
continued, article by Jew libeled by adL

"..When the Bund staged a rally in New York's Madison
Square Garden on February 20, 1939, the Trotskyist Socialist
Workers Party called a counter-demonstration. Fifty-thousand Jews
and others fought a five hour street battle with the cops, who
protected the Jew-haters. But the night belonged to the
demonstrators. The 20,000 Nazis and Coughlanites would have been
mauled if the police weren't present."
It has happened before in America and White "Jew-haters" in such large numbers, with cops on their side, no less, vs. Trotskyite kikes can and will happen again. White America will finally have had a bellyful of treacherous kikes and their shabbos goy collaborators like Bush and Clinton running thieir nation and will take back their own destiny. Had Rosenvelt and his cabal of New York/Hollywood/Washington interventionist Semites not managed to successfully demonize the Reich, claiming anti-Semitism and sedition against patriots like Coughlin, Lindbergh, Pound, Pelley, and those leading the German Bund, etc., America would have never entered WWII and turned the tide against Germany, the most successful fighters of Jewish communism in history. Americans will realize as we do that our country fought on the wrong side in WWII, that it was the Jew that won that war, not the Allies.
 
Old September 27th, 2005 #32
Amalekite
Retrosexual
 
Amalekite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The New Jerusalem
Posts: 799
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by White Will
Americans will realize as we do that our country fought on the wrong side in WWII, that it was the Jew that won that war, not the Allies.
Well said.
__________________
"A safe rule where Jewish propaganda is concerned is to multiply or divide their figures by ten, at least, before accepting them as the basis for discussion."
- Arnold Leese, from the December, 1937 edition of The Fascist.
 
Old September 27th, 2005 #33
Amalekite
Retrosexual
 
Amalekite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The New Jerusalem
Posts: 799
Default A Jew is a Jew is a Jew

According to Mr. Brenner, the IHR are "roaches", "nutsies", "loony", and "crackpots".

In a letter to the IHR, he wrote:
Quote:
I am your implacable opponent. I do not believe you have any right to exist . . . and I support any and all attempts, by any and all, Zionist or anti-Zionist, to bust up your institute and your meetings.
Suddenly I don't feel so bad that Mr. Lenni "Commie Jewboy" Brenner got jewed by the ADL.
__________________
"A safe rule where Jewish propaganda is concerned is to multiply or divide their figures by ten, at least, before accepting them as the basis for discussion."
- Arnold Leese, from the December, 1937 edition of The Fascist.
 
Old September 30th, 2005 #34
White Dragon
Senior Member
 
White Dragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,938
Default

Machinations of the Anti-Defamation League



Paul “Pete” McCloskey


A former US Congressman tells how his long career in law, politics, academic life, and the US Marine Corps led him to mistrust governmental official history, and to esteem the mission of the IHR. McCloskey relates what he has learned in his role as lead attorney in an ongoing class action suit that targets the ADL's vast spy operation, in concert with corrupt police officials in America and Israeli spy and police agen*cies, against American citizens. Inside information on how the Zionist lobby torpedoed his political career (and those of other loyal Americans); on how Jewish pressure prevented Stan*ford University from hiring world-class historian Norman Davies; on how, and why, the Lobby works the way it does. A witty, wise, enlightening presentation -- from the 13th IHR Conference (May 2000) -- by a contemporary rarity: a coura*geous, thoughtful, and independent man in public life. Here

 
Old October 1st, 2005 #35
Rounder
Senior Member
 
Rounder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 12,684
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by White Dragon
Machinations of the Anti-Defamation League



Paul “Pete” McCloskey


A former US Congressman tells how his long career in law, politics, academic life, and the US Marine Corps led him to mistrust governmental official history, and to esteem the mission of the IHR. McCloskey relates what he has learned in his role as lead attorney in an ongoing class action suit that targets the ADL's vast spy operation, in concert with corrupt police officials in America and Israeli spy and police agen*cies, against American citizens. Inside information on how the Zionist lobby torpedoed his political career (and those of other loyal Americans); on how Jewish pressure prevented Stan*ford University from hiring world-class historian Norman Davies; on how, and why, the Lobby works the way it does. A witty, wise, enlightening presentation -- from the 13th IHR Conference (May 2000) -- by a contemporary rarity: a coura*geous, thoughtful, and independent man in public life. Here




Former U.S. Congressman Paul Findley (D) from Illinois, who served 22 years in Congress, is another highly outspoken jew-wise critic of the GD kikes.

He stated in his book, "They Dare to Speak Out" : "No American foreign policy is possible without jewish approval." (Among his many truths).

Interestingly, Jesse Jackson was one of the dozen or so "prominent" leaders who indorsed that book.

Quoting credible people like McCloskey and Findley are essential to our efforts to EXPOSE THE JEWS to the masses. Thanks.
__________________
“To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize” —–Voltaire




 
Old October 1st, 2005 #36
KMRATHELL
deken
 
KMRATHELL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,865
Default You can't understand the nigger problem unil you understand the Jew problem

All major black "leaders" bow down to their Jewish masters. The ADL's endorsement is eagerly sought after by most black leaders. The ADL is actively trying to become a world-wide power by spreading their tentacles internationally. A recent article by the ADL criticises Namimbia, an African country who looks like it was the inspiration for the movie "Planet of the Apes", for publishing anti-holocaust articles there. My biggest surprise was that there were blacks that didn't buy into the holocaust bullshit, but the ADL, under Jew Foxman, went ballistic. The ADL is a powerful and dangerous organization. Never underestimate its power and danger to whites.
 
Old October 1st, 2005 #37
White Will
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,603
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rounder
Former U.S. Congressman Paul Findley (D) from Illinois, who served 22 years in Congress, is another highly outspoken jew-wise critic of the GD kikes.

He stated in his book, "They Dare to Speak Out" : "No American foreign policy is possible without jewish approval." (Among his many truths).

Interestingly, Jesse Jackson was one of the dozen or so "prominent" leaders who indorsed that book.

Quoting credible people like McCloskey and Findley are essential to our efforts to EXPOSE THE JEWS to the masses. Thanks.
To paraphrase the Leader, "There are all sorts of useful facts laying around our feet, if only people would take the time to look down." Our people are too busy watching the niggers play ball to look down, eh, Glenn?
 
Old October 1st, 2005 #38
Rounder
Senior Member
 
Rounder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 12,684
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by White Will
To paraphrase the Leader, "There are all sorts of useful facts laying around our feet, if only people would take the time to look down." Our people are too busy watching the niggers play ball to look down, eh, Glenn?
And, "there are none so blind as those who WILL NOT see."

One Florida soccermom who received a TAA was quoted in a Florida newspaper as calling it "psychological terrorism." What she really meant was that TAA truths and realities scared the shit out of her.

TAA 3 btw, is gonna scare the shit out of more soccermoms and girli-men than all previous editions combined. Oh, glory days !!!

(How many copies should I put you down for, Will?)
__________________
“To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize” —–Voltaire




 
Old October 1st, 2005 #39
White Will
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,603
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rounder
And, "there are none so blind as those who WILL NOT see."

One Florida soccermom who received a TAA was quoted in a Florida newspaper as calling it "psychological terrorism." What she really meant was that TAA truths and realities scared the shit out of her.

TAA 3 btw, is gonna scare the shit out of more soccermoms and girli-men than all previous editions combined. Oh, glory days !!!

(How many copies should I put you down for, Will?)
Since I know that special orders don't upset you, a check for $64 will be in the mail to you Monday for 400 TAAs #3. Send me 50 and 350 to Alex for distribution in Kirksville by him and whomever else signs on to help him get them out. Thanks to the ADL and their shabbos goy useful idiots, Kirksville will be a flashpoint of VNN activity in the coming weeks.

In line with the comments of that Florida soccer mom, a Raleigh TV newsreader once commented on some literature I and my comrades had distributed there with this: "The reason these people are so dangerous is because they come across as so reasonable and rational." No shit, Sherlock!
And those we are trying to reach respond to reasonable, rational White folks who stand up and consistently articulate what they have been feeling but never hear from newsreading media whores.
 
Old October 1st, 2005 #40
Amalekite
Retrosexual
 
Amalekite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The New Jerusalem
Posts: 799
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by White Will
...a Raleigh TV newsreader once commented on some literature I and my comrades had distributed there with this: "The reason these people are so dangerous is because they come across as so reasonable and rational."
Wow! They really said that on the air? That's quite a compliment! :cheers:
__________________
"A safe rule where Jewish propaganda is concerned is to multiply or divide their figures by ten, at least, before accepting them as the basis for discussion."
- Arnold Leese, from the December, 1937 edition of The Fascist.
 
Reply

Tags
abe foxman, adl, jew lies, jew on white, jew pedophile, jew propaganda, jew rape, leo frank, mary phagan

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:16 PM.
Page generated in 1.80189 seconds.