|
July 12th, 2008 | #1 | |||
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 169
|
Jews
http://inverted-world.com/index.php/..._hypocritical/
Quote:
__________________
National Futurism |
|||
July 12th, 2008 | #2 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 169
|
I agree with Iceman.
Constantin Quote:
__________________
National Futurism |
|
July 12th, 2008 | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cali
Posts: 6,907
|
Sounds like something right out of cointel zog central. Hey jews aren't hypocritical. It's the liberal jews who are the problem not the neo cons right wing jews. Whites do the same thing. If we're not careful jews might disappear. Some jews might even be with us White Nationalists.
Keerist who writes this shit? And is there anybody on VNN who believes it other than the usual trolls and anti's. |
July 14th, 2008 | #4 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: in a gene near you
Posts: 4,982
|
Quote:
Jews , are the ultimate in hypocrisy. There isn't a font big enough , to spell it out . Plus , they are cunning enough to dissemble and play both sides of the issue . So , the poor goy is totally bewildered . Even when the net is closed on him , the poor goy is saying ' what happened , I don't understand , who hit us in the back of the head ?'. |
|
July 14th, 2008 | #5 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: in a gene near you
Posts: 4,982
|
Quote:
|
|
July 14th, 2008 | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,229
|
I posted over there about the fact that Thomas Friedman, a leading NYT columnist, was a big cheerleader for the Iraq invasion.
Thus Joblings theory destroyed. Of course Jews do make complaints about media outlets that they are anti-Israel, but it's along the lines of Shakespeare's famous line, "Methinks the lady doth complain too much!" |
July 14th, 2008 | #7 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 169
|
Quote:
Constantin
__________________
National Futurism |
|
July 15th, 2008 | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,311
|
Jobling is a long-time Jew-apologist associated with Jared Taylor's AmRen. Their lies belong in the section devoted to our enemies, not the executive summary of our own pro-white views.
Now as for the NYT, if they were truly anti-Zionist or even halfway balanced, they would have taken the opportunity to support the powerful scholarship of Mearsheimer and Walt. Instead they show themselves to be Zionist apologists, just like other liberal Jews ranging from Dershowitz to the New Republic to JJ Goldberg's own Forward. A Prosecutorial Brief Against Israel and Its Supporters By WILLIAM GRIMES Quote:
|
|
July 15th, 2008 | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: OH
Posts: 401
|
from the mouths of the jews....
14!
"The jew cries out in pain as he slaps your face." Nuff said!! A88 |
July 16th, 2008 | #10 |
Administrator
|
Is Ian Jobling a jew?
If so, isn't that relevant? Isn't he like a financial reporter not mentioning he owns a thousand shares of stock in the company he's writing about? Last edited by Alex Linder; July 17th, 2008 at 01:44 AM. |
July 16th, 2008 | #12 |
Administrator
|
Jobling neglects to mention that the NYT promoted, more than any other publication, Bush's lie about WMD in Iraq. When it came down to it, the NYT is on the same side as Likud. The rest is verbal camouflage, from NYT and jew Jobling both.
|
July 17th, 2008 | #13 |
Administrator
|
Philip Weiss II: Jews as a Component of the American Elite
December 23, 2007 Philip Weiss raises a number of important issues in his comment on my last blog. The one that should be on everyone’s mind is the nature of American elites. He quite rightly points out that the American elite is much more than just Jews. The critical point, however, is that Jews have played a critical role in the American elite, particularly in the construction of culture. This is certainly not surprising. Jews have shown repeatedly that they tend to become an elite. I regard this as more or less inevitable given the characteristics of Jews. But, since Jews in the Diaspora are a small minority, this typically involves making alliances with other elites. This is true throughout Jewish history. Indeed, a common theme of historical anti-Semitism has been that non-Jewish elites — often alien non-Jewish elites — have made alliances with Jews in opposition to the interests of other sectors of the population. However, given that Jews compose a significant part of the elite in the United States, Jewish issues and concerns have become part of the consensus among elites. Minimally, this has required a repudiation of anti-Semitism, and at least since WWII, the non-Jewish components of the American elite have indeed done so, at least overtly. The problem arises because, as Weiss acknowledges, the Jewish component of the elite still perceives itself and therefore acts as outsiders. Weiss notes that the WASPs had a sense of noblesse oblige, which is another way of saying that the WASPs identified to a considerable extent with their country as a whole and their countrymen, and they were willing to contribute to public goods. As Frank Salter and Robert Putnam note, individuals are less willing to contribute to public goods in ethnically diverse societies. But this also implies that Jews as outsiders have been less concerned about the interests of the American majority. And not only do Jews see themselves as outsiders, they are outsiders with a long sense of history — an often tragic history in which people very much like the American majority participated in anti-Jewish movements. They are thus not simply indifferent to the interests of the American majority, they form a hostile elite, as they did in the Soviet Union. In his 1997 Jewish Power: Inside the American Jewish Establishment, J. J. Goldberg identified several consensus Jewish issues, including Israel and the welfare of other foreign Jewries, immigration and refugee policy, and church-state separation. All of these carry the potential for conflicts of interest with the American majority. Moreover, immigration policy since 1965 and church-state separation can only be understood as anti-majority because they involve the displacement of the traditional culture and ethnic mix of America. There is no question that Jewish influence was decisive in both the area of church-state separation and immigration policy. To the extent that non-Jewish elites have been major players in these issues (and I have no doubt that they are, especially in the area of immigration policy), it must be seen as an individualist strategy. That is, elite non-Jews may reasonably believe that the cultural and demographic changes resulting from the transformation of the American elite will not hurt them personally because they can retreat to their gated communities, elite schools, and exclusive country clubs. And it must be said that American individualism had strong strands of universalism that long preceded Jewish influence. This struck me once again in reading a review of a recent book on the history of American transcendentalism. The reviewer points to the universalist, democratic, and egalitarian impulses of this movement originated by descendants of the Puritans. Divine energy “coursed through the natural world, especially the human heart. … The only thing they would not tolerate was intolerance.” No ethnocentrism here. Indeed, the transcendentalists were very involved in the abolitionist movement, including some who funded John Brown’s violent uprising. These are powerful currents in Western culture, and they seem to predispose non-Jewish European elites to engage in altruistic punishment against their own people for perceived moral transgressions. Not coincidentally, the Jewish intellectual and political movements I discuss in The Culture of Critique all had strong moral overtones. Nevertheless, these individualist elites are paying a heavy price in terms of ethnic kinship. The eclipse of European America will certainly result in huge costs for the European majority, but they will be borne mainly by less intelligent and less conscientious whites. Nevertheless, if the transcendentalists tell us anything, European-American elites have done that before. If there is a difference in the current situation, it is perhaps that the transcendentalists may well have implicitly envisioned a morally purified white America rather than the present specter of a non-white America where they themselves are displaced. It is certainly the case that European-American elites are individualistic, but, as noted above, until the rise of the Jewish component of the American elite, there was a sense of noblesse oblige and a connection to the people. That seems to be missing now. Regarding Weiss’s other points, my comments on contemporary Jewish marriage patterns appear in an earlier blog and Chapter 9 of Separation and Its Discontents. Weiss agrees that Jews tend to be psychologically intense, but seems to think that I mean that all Jews are psychologically intense. Not so. It’s like the bell curve for IQ: There is a higher average IQ among Jews, but there is variation around the mean, with some Jews quite a bit below the mean and even below the white average. In general when dealing with Jewish issues, one has to be aware of the complexity of the Jewish community. Responsible treatments of Jewish involvement in promoting the Iraq war, including that of Mearsheimer and Walt, are careful to distinguish different elements of the American Jewish community. Indeed, a recent poll once again shows the gap between most American Jews and the organized Jewish community, especially on issues related to Israel and the policies of the Bush administration. There is far less of a gap, if indeed there is any at all, on issues such as immigration or church-state separation. Indeed, as James Petras points out: Given the high salience of being pro-Israel for the majority of American Jews and the fact that the source of their identity stems more from their loyalty to Israel than to the Talmud or religious myths and rituals, then it is clear that both the ‘progressive, majority of Jews and the reactionary minority who head up all the major American Jewish organizations have a fundamental point of agreement and convergence: Support and identity with Israel and its anti-Arab prejudices, its expansion and the dispossession of Palestine. This overriding convergence allows the reactionary Presidents of the Major Jewish Organizations in America to speak for the Jewish community with virtually no opposition from the progressive majority either within or without their organizations. Weiss dislikes ethnocentrism among Europeans as well as among Jews, but excuses Jewish ethnocentrism because of the Holocaust. But the idea that the Holocaust resulted in Jewish ethnocentrism is demonstrably incorrect. There is ample historical evidence for a deep concern about intermarriage as well as for ethnic networking and ingroup charity among Jews throughout history. One simply can’t read this without coming away with a deep appreciation of the commitment of Jews to their group and their concern about keeping the group’s ethnic integrity. See A People That Shall Dwell Alone. Nevertheless, there is every reason to suppose that Jewish ethnocentrism would be increased as a result of a disaster. This has been noted quite often by Jewish historians and it is consistent with psychological research on people with strong commitment to a group. It is also powerfully woven into the very fabric of the Old Testament where there is a constant drumbeat to the effect that disasters happen because the Jews have strayed from the word of God. http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/Blog-WeissII.htm |
July 17th, 2008 | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,311
|
If you got that from me, Alex, I meant only apologist for the Jew, as in his last undifferentiated smokescreen.
But to your point, it was only when the neoliberal NYT chimed in on WMD that I knew the Iraq war had ceased to be a neocon fantasy. Some sophistacted people I predicted it to didn't believe me at the time. I was giving to much credit to the Jews, they said. |
July 17th, 2008 | #15 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 169
|
__________________
National Futurism |
July 17th, 2008 | #16 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 169
|
Statistically, more Jews than Christians opposed the Iraq war (http://www.jewishaz.com/issues/story.mv?051223+poll). After all, most Jews in America vote Democrat and not Republican. Yeah, "the Jews" are all behind Bush:
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...325529,00.html Most Jews are not neocons. It is dishonest to say that. Constantin
__________________
National Futurism |
July 17th, 2008 | #17 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,377
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
July 17th, 2008 | #18 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cali
Posts: 6,907
|
Quote:
Quote:
I would still call bullshit because who cares if your average everyday Joe Manischewitz and Samuela Split tail doesn't support the war. They're not the problem. Well, they are the problem in that they always support other jews. but not the problem in that they are affecting me personally. Big jew is the problem. Those jew newpaper owners, the jew owned networks hiring other jews to tell me lies night after night. The AIPAC jews with real money to buy our politicians, the banker jews at the Federal Reserve. The list goes on and on. So I'm not real impressed with a poll by another kike "committee" telling me something that I know is horse manure. This is White Nationalism 101, are you sure you're not at the wrong place? Last edited by Steve B; July 17th, 2008 at 02:40 PM. |
||
July 17th, 2008 | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,377
|
Who even made this claim? All jews are jews, doesn’t matter if they are communists capitalists, liberals, conservatives or whatever, they always look out for their interests to the detriment of others. Any difference between any of these groups is smoke and mirrors.
Conservatives want open borders because cheap labour is good for big business. Liberals want open borders because it would be unfair to discriminate. Conservatives want an endless war in the middle east. Liberals want an endless ‘peace keeping mission’ in every country in the world. Communists want the govt to own everything and have total power. Capitalists want big business to own everything and use its wealth to control govt, ie have total power too. The end result is the same, just the foolish goys remain divided, arguing over whether we should run off the cliff, jump off the cliff or walk off the cliff. |
July 18th, 2008 | #20 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 169
|
Where is the evidence that Ian Jobling is a Jew?
Constantin
__________________
National Futurism |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|