Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old December 15th, 2020 #21
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,689
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stewart Meadows View Post
Actually, on this forum I've posted new articles about how the jews (including Hollywood and the NBA) have a strong partnership with the mass-murdering Chinese regime.
thats coming to an end soon
__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race


''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers
 
Old December 15th, 2020 #22
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,529
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Serbian View Post
thats coming to an end soon
Honestly, I doubt it. The following article from The Jewish Chronicle is the umpteenth example of how the Chinese love jews:

Quote:
The ‘great schmoozer’ with big plans


An international upbringing prepared Natanel Bigger for life as an entrepreneur. Now he's launching his own haircare brand.

Viola Levy
May 7, 2020 08:02

(...) Yet his childhood in Hamburg was not easy. While cities like Berlin and Frankfurt have thriving Jewish communities, this was less the case in conservative Hamburg, where he and his Israeli mother were very much outsiders.

“Elderly people would poke at us with their walking sticks and mutter ‘Ausländer raus!’ (Foreigners out!)” Not having a Jewish community or a large family for support, it was hard for mother and son to maintain traditions like Shabbat or synagogue. Teachers would also try to make Bigger say Christian prayers in the classroom, while fellow pupils frequently made flippant jokes about Hitler as a way of dealing with the uncomfortable legacy that their grandparents had left behind. Once, he was even attacked by a much older boy — a neo-Nazi — resulting in a broken arm and almost five months in hospital.

Undeterred by these negative experiences, he threw himself into getting as much work experience as possible and at university decided to read Chinese Studies. This took him to China where he learnt to speak Mandarin (already speaking fluent Hebrew, German and English).

Surprisingly, China is where he reconnected with his Jewish side. “I started attending community services and reconnecting with my faith via other ex-pat Jews I met out there.” Rather than encountering hostility for being Jewish, he said that in China it was quite the opposite. “The Chinese know Jews as good business people. When you say you’re Jewish in shops, they drop the price and say things like ‘Jewish people are very smart — very, very smart!’”
https://www.thejc.com/lifestyle/feat...plans-1.499550
 
Old December 16th, 2020 #23
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,689
Talking

__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race


''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers
 
Old December 16th, 2020 #24
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,689
jewsign Jews at The Atlantic

The Nazi Inspiring China’s Communists

A decades-old legal argument used by Hitler has found support in Beijing.


CHANG CHE
DECEMBER 1, 2020



When Hong Kong erupted into protest this summer against a national-security law imposed by Beijing, the fact that Chinese scholars leaped to the Communist Party’s defense was perhaps predictable. How they argued in favor of it, however, was not.

“Since Hong Kong’s handover,” Wang Zhenmin, a law professor at Tsinghua University, one of China’s most prestigious institutions, wrote in People’s Daily, “numerous incidents have posed serious threats to Hong Kong’s prosperity and stability.” The city, Wang was effectively arguing, was in no position to discuss civil liberties when its basic survival was on the line. Qi Pengfei, a specialist on Hong Kong at Renmin University, echoed those sentiments, insisting that the security law was meant to protect the island from the “infiltration of foreign forces.” In articles, interviews, and news conferences throughout the summer, scores of academics made a similar case.

Though Chinese academics are often circumscribed in what they can and cannot say, they nevertheless do disagree in public. At times, they even offer limited, and careful, critiques of China’s leadership. This time, however, the sheer volume of pieces that Chinese scholars produced, as well as the nature of those arguments—consistent, coordinated, and often couched in sophisticated legal jargon—suggested a new level of cohesion in Beijing on the acceptable scope of the state’s power.

Chinese President Xi Jinping has markedly shifted the ideological center of gravity within the Communist Party. The limited tolerance China had toward dissent has all but dissipated, while ostensibly autonomous regions (geographically as well as culturally), including Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, and Hong Kong, have seen their freedoms curtailed. All the while, a new group of scholars has been in ascendance. Known as “statists,” these academics subscribe to an expansive view of state authority, one even broader than their establishment counterparts. Only with a heavy hand, they believe, can a nation secure the stability required to protect liberty and prosperity. As a 2012 article in Utopia, a Chinese online forum for statist ideas, once put it, “Stability overrides all else.”

Prioritizing order to this degree is anathema to much of the West, yet perspectives such as these are not unprecedented in Western history. In fact, China’s new statists have much in common with a faction that swept through Germany in the early 20th century.

That affinity is no accident.
China has in recent years witnessed a surge of interest in the work of the German legal theorist Carl Schmitt. Known as Hitler’s “Crown Jurist,” Schmitt joined the National Socialist Party in 1933, and, though he was only officially a Nazi Party member for three years, his anti-liberal jurisprudence had a lasting impact—at the time, by helping to justify Hitler’s extrajudicial killings of Jews and political opponents, and then long afterward. Whereas liberal scholars view the rule of law as the final authority on value conflicts, Schmitt believed that the sovereign should always have the final say. Commitments to the rule for law would only undercut a community’s decision-making power, and “deprive state and politics of their specific meaning.” Such a hamstrung state, according to Schmitt, could not protect its own citizens from external enemies.

China’s fascination with Schmitt took off in the early 2000s when the philosopher Liu Xiaofeng translated the German thinker’s major works into Chinese. Dubbed “Schmitt fever,” his ideas energized the political science, philosophy, and law departments of China’s universities. Chen Duanhong, a law professor at Peking University, called Schmitt “the most successful theorist” to have brought political concepts into his discipline. “His constitutional doctrine is what we revere,” Chen wrote in 2012, before adding, of his Nazi membership, “That’s his personal choice.” An alum of Peking University’s philosophy program, who asked not to be identified speaking on sensitive issues, told me that Schmitt’s work was among “the common language, a part of the academic establishment” at the university.

Schmitt’s influence is most evident when it comes to Beijing’s policy toward Hong Kong. Since its handover to China from Britain in 1997, the city has ostensibly been ruled under a “one country, two systems” framework, whereby it would be part of China, but its freedoms, independent judiciary, and other forms of autonomy would be preserved for 50 years. Over time, these freedoms have been eroded as the CCP has sought greater control, and more recently have been undermined completely with the national-security law.

Chen, who has written extensively on Hong Kong policy since 2014 and, according to The New York Times, is a former adviser to Beijing on the issue, cited Schmitt directly in defense of the concept of a national-security law back in 2018. “The German jurist Carl Schmitt,” he argued in an article, distinguishes between state norms and constitutional norms. “When the state is in dire peril,” Chen wrote, citing Schmitt, state leaders have the right to suspend constitutional norms, “especially provisions for civil rights.” Jiang Shigong, also a law professor at Peking University, has made a similar case. Jiang, who worked as a researcher in Beijing’s Liaison Office in Hong Kong from 2004 to 2008, employs Schmitt’s ideas extensively in his 2010 book, China’s Hong Kong, to resolve tensions between sovereignty and the rule of law in favor of the Communist Party.*

Jiang is also widely credited with authoring the 2014 Chinese-government white paper that gives Beijing “comprehensive jurisdiction” over Hong Kong. In a nod to Schmitt, the paper claims that the preservation of sovereignty—of “one country”—must take precedence over civil liberties—of “two systems.” Using Schmitt’s rationale, he raises the stakes of inaction in Hong Kong insurmountably high: No longer a liberal transgression, the security law becomes an existential necessity.

Chen and Jiang are “the most concrete expression thus far of [China’s] post-1990s turn to Schmittian ideas,” Ryan Mitchell, a law professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, wrote in a paper in July. They are the vanguard of the statist movement, which supplies the rationale for the authoritarian impulses of China’s leaders. And though it is unclear precisely how powerful they are in the upper echelons of the party, these statists share the same outlook as their paramount leader. “Xi Jinping’s big project is on reinventing and revitalizing state capacity,” Jude Blanchette, China chair at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told me. “He is a statist.”

Why has a Nazi thinker garnered such a lively reception in China? To some degree, it is a matter of convenience. “Schmitt serves certain purposes that Marxism should have done, but can no longer do,” Haig Patapan, a politics professor at Griffith University in Australia who has written on Schmitt’s reception in China, told me. Schmitt gives pro-Beijing scholars an opportunity to anchor the party’s legitimacy on more primal forces—nationalism and external enemies—rather than the timeworn notion of class struggle.

Ideology is only part of the story, though. Another explanation is found in China’s history. In the 1930s, the country’s then-leader Chiang Kai-Shek developed a deep admiration for Nazi Germany. “[Germany] was a country like China that had unified itself late,” William Kirby, a professor of China studies at Harvard University and the author of Germany and Republican China, told me. For China, a nation flanked by foreign adversaries, the German example of rapid modernization seemed exemplary. In 1927, Chiang would hire the German artillery expert Max Bauer to be his military adviser; his own son, Chiang Wei-Kuo, would serve in the Wehrmacht, the Nazi military arm, during the 1938 invasion of Austria.

One lesson from Chiang’s rule is that threats from abroad can stoke authoritarianism at home. And for almost a century, even as power transferred from Chiang’s Nationalists to Mao Zedong’s Communists, fear of “enemy” infiltration—the seedbed for fascism—lingered in China’s national psyche. “Who are our enemies? Who are our friends?” Mao asked in the very first line of his Selected Works. Later, from 1989 to 1991, 500 articles in the People’s Daily, the state-controlled paper, contained the phrase “hostile forces.” The perceived threat of invasion, or at minimum suspicion of outsiders, continues to inform contemporary politics. Such anxiety lends credence to the anti-liberal theories of Carl Schmitt, who once proclaimed that all “political actions and motives can be reduced [to that distinction] between friends and enemies.”

The pandemic has further ensconced statists’ views. That China has gotten rid of the virus, which President Donald Trump called “the invisible enemy,” while the United States remains hobbled by it, is portrayed among Chinese statists as a triumph for the Schmittian worldview.

“Since Xi Jinping became China’s top leader,” Flora Sapio, a sinologist at the University of Naples, wrote, “Carl Schmitt’s philosophy has found even wider applications in China, in both ‘Party theory’ and academic life.” This shift is significant: It marks a move from what had been an illiberal government in Beijing—one that flouts liberal norms as a matter of convenience—to an anti-liberal government—one that repudiates liberal norms as a matter of principle.

https://www.theatlantic.com/internat...chmitt/617237/
__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race


''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers
 
Old December 16th, 2020 #25
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,529
Default

.
The Jewnited States will always have a pro-Chinese policy, regardless of who the so-called president is. Here's a good piece by Ann Coulter about how Trump's despicable jewish "advisers" (read: handlers) got him to drop his pro-American stance in order to favor the mass-murdering Chinese regime:

Quote:
Ann Coulter: Trump and China: a Love Story


Ann Coulter 22 Apr 2020

(...) On the other hand, Trump does deserve a lot of the blame for the Wuhan virus by keeping — wait, checking my notes — NONE of his promises on China. This, the media will never mention.

During the campaign, Trump sure talked a good game. He said, “We can’t continue to allow China to rape our country.” He vowed to put tariffs on their goods and bring manufacturing home.

Then he got elected, and Jared Kushner, Gary Cohn, and Trump’s other salt-of-the-earth advisers told him tariffs were a bad idea. So he imposed no tariffs for two long years and, today, almost all our pharmaceuticals, face masks and other crucial supplies are still being made in China.
(...)
“Birth tourism” has also continued apace under Trump, with tens of thousands of pregnant Chinese ladies flying to America every year for the sole purpose of giving birth to an anchor baby, who will then be used to bring the whole family here.

There’s one way to stop it, and Trump could do it tomorrow. Sign an executive order ending the anchor baby scam. Not say he’s going to sign it, as he does whenever he wants to gin up the base. Actually sign it.

The Supreme Court has never ruled that the children born to illegal aliens or tourists are citizens, for the simple reason that that would be insane. The 14th amendment is about slavery, as the court has repeatedly held, not Chinese birth tourists or pregnant Mexicans.

But he won’t do it. Ivanka needs her trademarks — and Goldman might give Jared a job! Sorry about that Wuhan flu, America.
https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/...-a-love-story/

Now, does anybody really think that Beijing Biden (who's an even bigger jew-lackey than Trump) will confront the Chinese scum? Seriously?



 
Old December 16th, 2020 #26
Fico
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 974
Default

China is example how develop society do not depend about economy then genetic. They are high IQ state with socialism so it is not strange that they favorize Hitler who was also socialist. I can make conclusion that is socialism possible only in racial clean society as China,Germany and it is not same as marxism who want multiracial socialism because it leads in chaos. Glad to see political incorrect opinion in one power state however influence of China is danger for the White race. I think that Australian WN's can say more about it. We can learn from them that it is possible to have political incorrect state with enough power,it depends only about will of one society. Schmitt have high respect among intelectual WN.

Last edited by Fico; December 21st, 2020 at 02:56 AM.
 
Old December 18th, 2020 #27
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,689
Default

US Navy to be ‘more assertive’ in countering China in Pacific

Al Jazeera English 8 hrs ago

The US military has warned that its warships would be “more assertive” in responding to violations of international law, citing in particular Beijing, which it accused of having expansionist ambitions in the South China Sea.



In a document setting objectives for the US Navy, Marines and Coast Guard for the coming years, the Pentagon said on Thursday that several countries, notably Russia and China “are contesting the balance of power in key regions and seeking to undermine the existing world order”.

“Our globally deployed naval forces interact with Chinese and Russian warships and aircraft daily,” the document said, noting their “growing aggressiveness” and calling China “the most pressing, long-term strategic threat”.

The latest incident between the US and China naval forces took place in late August when Beijing said it had driven an American warship from the disputed Paracel archipelago.

China claims almost all of the islands of the South China Sea, territorial claims disputed by other countries in the region including Vietnam, Malaysia, the Philippines and Brunei.

China’s claim has also been rejected by the International Court of Arbitration in The Hague, but it has continued to build artificial islands and installed naval and air facilities.

‘Freedom of navigation’
To counter China, the US has been sending ships to the region more frequently to carry out what it calls “freedom of navigation” operations.

To maintain a strategic advantage over the Chinese Navy whose “battle force has more than tripled in size in only two decades,” the US Navy plans to modernise with smaller, more agile and even remotely piloted ships.

US ships will also “accept calculated tactical risks and adopt a more assertive posture in our day-to-day operations,” the statement said.

For Navy Rear Admiral Jay Bynum that means being “more responsive, more assertive”.

“In the past, our behaviour was de-escalation. We would turn away and would minimise risk in those individual contacts,” he said, noting that the Navy “might be ceding ground” with the approach.

The Pentagon document specified that the US Navy will also be more visible in the Pacific, where it will “detect and document our rivals’ actions that violate international law, steal resources, and infringe upon the sovereignty of other nations”.

In response, Beijing has accused the US of stirring conflict in the region, while also stepping up its diplomatic efforts to gain more support among the countries in Southeast Asia.

https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/world...?ocid=msedgntp
__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race


''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers
 
Old December 18th, 2020 #28
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,689
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stewart Meadows View Post
.
The Jewnited States will always have a pro-Chinese policy, regardless of who the so-called president is.
You make me laugh. Can you really be this blind?
__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race


''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers
 
Old December 18th, 2020 #29
Dawn Cannon
Senior Member
 
Dawn Cannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The Vampire Ball
Posts: 6,410
Default

Give them California, and throw Portland in too.
 
Old December 18th, 2020 #30
Gerry Fable
'God Belief, German Piety'
 
Gerry Fable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,910
Default

Neocons versus Globalists.

Brief:

The neocons are motivated by securing US hegemony far into the next century. They want to capsize China's economy as well break up Russia into smaller states.

The Globalists want to usher in a NWO in the form of a Great Reset which includes China and Russia although both nations reject it. Such a global reset, if successful, would reduce the US in power and status.

China is a threat to US hegemony whose success is built on the back of globalist trade deals. However, China is motivated primarily by nationalistic goals and not some utopian globalist Great Reset. In short, China has fallen foul of both neocons and globalists.

Don't forget it was the neocons and globalists who united against Trump. Although neocon supporting outfits such as Fox News are, for the moment, backing Trump's claims of a rigged election.


BREAKING: US Department of State Issues New Warnings: “The Chinese Communist Party Poses a Real Threat”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...D1h2Ok2v2E-Exc


The US is Set on a Path to War with China. What Is to be Done?
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...D1h2Ok2v2E-Exc


US-China relations: make peace, not trade war, to ensure mutually beneficial growth
https://www.scmp.com/comment/opinion...MFsYBC2Gc-UO44


The US isn't interested in mutual development. It wants the entire world under its domination.
__________________
"Man is not God. But he is God's birthplace. God exists and grows in man. If God does not come in man, He never comes~ Hence the German religion is the religion of high faith in man."-Alfred Rosenberg

Last edited by Gerry Fable; December 18th, 2020 at 08:08 AM.
 
Old December 18th, 2020 #31
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,529
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stewart Meadows View Post
Actually, on this forum I've posted new articles about how the jews (including Hollywood and the NBA) have a strong partnership with the mass-murdering Chinese regime.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Serbian View Post
thats coming to an end soon
But if it's coming to an end soon, then why is Pissrael making important trade pacts with China? For example, I recently posted the following article in another thread:

Quote:
Can China Replace the United States in Israel?


Talk of new Chinese-Israeli trade deals points to more complicated relationships with Washington to come.

BY DANIEL J. SAMET | FEBRUARY 3, 2020, 3:30 PM



In the wake of the United States and China’s phase one trade deal, the latter is quietly trying to strike an agreement of its own with Israel. Reports last December indicated that, after years of secret talks, China and Israel could conclude a trade pact sometime in 2020. This news renders an already contentious trilateral relationship even more so.
(...)
A Chinese-Israeli agreement would be as much of a political gesture as an economic one. Although China would presumably welcome the increased trade any agreement would bring, of far greater value is access to the Israeli high-tech sector. The reputed Silicon Wadi offers much to the Chinese economy, not the least of which is advanced technology that could enhance China’s expanding surveillance state. Whether or not the deal addresses head-on Chinese access to these companies matters little relative to the geostrategic victory, as it would at least pave the way for future discussions about access. An agreement would make Israel more economically dependent on China—right now Israel’s second-largest trade partner—and as such beholden to the Communist Party in not only commerce but also politics and security. The 2015 Haifa Port deal, which granted Shanghai International Port Group rights to operate the port for 25 years, much to the United States’ chagrin, may have brought just a fraction of future Chinese influence over Israel.
(...)
What helps explain this trend is the relative absence of anti-Semitism in Chinese history as well as the Israeli view that much of the West (Europe especially) is irredeemably opposed to the Jewish state. Beijing has caught on to these perceptions, leading the Chinese ambassador to Israel to tout the supposedly “unbreakable foundation of the China-Israel friendship.” Israel’s shifting orientation toward China will likely continue.
https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/02/03...tes-in-israel/

What's your opinion on this?
 
Old December 18th, 2020 #32
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,529
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Serbian View Post
You make me laugh. Can you really be this blind?
So you deny that Joe Biden is a China-puppet? That's strange... You're probably the only person on VNN who hasn't heard about his son Cunter's crooked business dealings with the mass-murdering Chinese regime. You know, the business dealings that the jewish media and jewish tech companies have done their best to ignore, even going so far as to suppress news stories about them.
 
Old December 18th, 2020 #33
Crowe
Senior Member
 
Crowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
Default

The Chinese government model has clearly shifted away from Maoist Communism. They're pursuing rapid economic growth in similar ways that the German Reich did. Not quite as effective, but certainly more effective than what they were doing previously.

Jews absolutely had their hand in the CCP, however, at the same time it seems clear to me that the Chinese keep pursuing interests that benefit them, and haven't lost focus of those goals in spite of jewish subversion. I think the Chinese pinned the jews for precisely what they are - opportunistic, greedy parasites. They took jewish investment money into their country because it served their own purpose. They work with jews when it suits them, and oppose them when it doesn't. The same case could be made for Russia and Putin. If you want to look at complete jewish control, look at the jewnited states, and the jewropean union.
__________________
Low-IQ bible scholars are legion, the big book o' bullshit is catnip to the underbrained. --ALEX LINDER
 
Old December 18th, 2020 #34
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,529
Default

.
I see that I got nine(!) thumbs down in this thread in, like, 20 seconds. The truth hurts, doesn't it?

(And no, I haven't given anybody thumbs down here, in case you're wondering.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowe View Post
I think the Chinese pinned the jews for precisely what they are - opportunistic, greedy parasites. They took jewish investment money into their country because it served their own purpose. They work with jews when it suits them, and oppose them when it doesn't.
Yes, because, as everyone knows, jews are naive country bumpkins who easily get conned out of their money, and they're way too stupid to deal with Chinese third-world savages. And the rich, influential and extremely pro-Chinese jew Bob Iger, who wants to be Biden's ambassador to China, is also one of these jewish simpletons:

Quote:
Report: Disney Chairman Bob Iger Interested in Becoming Biden’s Ambassador to China


DAVID NG 18 Dec 2020

Bob Iger, chairman of the Walt Disney Co., has expressed interest in becoming ambassador to China under Joe Biden, reportedly making overtures to people in the president-elect’s team about the plum diplomatic post.

But the possible appointment is already drawing criticism as a weak choice given Disney’s history of appeasement to China’s Communist dictatorship.
(...)
Presidents have traditionally rewarded big-ticket donors with ambassadorships. On top of that, Iger’s long-running business relationship with Chinese president Xi Jinping could serve as a potential bonus to seal the deal.

But Bob Iger also presents major drawbacks in light of Disney’s past failure to stand up to China’s Communist rulers.

Iger came under fire last year for refusing to condemn China’s crackdown on pro-democracy protestors in Hong Kong. Under his leadership, Disney forbade ESPN journalists from addressing any discussion of the relationship between China and Hong Kong. The decision came after the controversy involving Houston Rockets general manager Daryl Morey, who tweeted support for Hong Kong’s pro-democracy movement.

Disney has invested heavily in China, with theme parks in Shanghai and Hong Kong. The studio also relies on the Chinese box office to help its blockbuster movies turn a profit. As a result, Iger has developed close ties to China’s Communist Party leaders.
https://www.breitbart.com/entertainm...a-under-biden/

Quote:
Robert Iger, was born to a Jewish family in New York City.[2][3][4]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Iger
 
Old December 18th, 2020 #35
Crowe
Senior Member
 
Crowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stewart Meadows View Post
.
I see that I got nine(!) thumbs down in this thread in, like, 20 seconds. The truth hurts, doesn't it?

(And no, I haven't given anybody thumbs down here, in case you're wondering.)
Neither have I. I can even take a screenshot of my recent thumbs given page to prove it if requested.

Quote:
Yes, because, as everyone knows, jews are naive country bumpkins who easily get conned out of their money, and they're way too stupid to deal with Chinese third-world savages. And the rich, influential and extremely pro-Chinese jew Bob Iger, who wants to be Biden's ambassador to China, is also one of these jewish simpletons:
Biden is pro-China, because he's a sell-out.

Jews seem split with regards to China. Some would continue to work with them, whereas some view them as a threat to their hegemony. It's a little more complex than a simple black and white issue.

The Chinese will take jew money when it's offered. In fact, the jews built their country up, at our expense. Whether the jews were idiots for building up China, only time will tell, but it's clear to me that some of them are scared.

Fake news like news max and breitbart for example spews the same tiresome rhetoric about "Socialism", and constantly lumps China and Russia together as merica's enemies. Of course, I can read in between the lines and see that the real reason (((they're))) mad is because those counties pose a threat to jewish hegemony. This is standard M.O., go after your enemies while using rhetoric that rallies the retarded masses to (((the cause))). I figured you of all people would see through that bullshit.
__________________
Low-IQ bible scholars are legion, the big book o' bullshit is catnip to the underbrained. --ALEX LINDER

Last edited by Crowe; December 18th, 2020 at 05:11 PM.
 
Old December 18th, 2020 #36
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,529
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowe View Post
Of course, I can read in between the lines and see that the real reason (((they're))) mad is because those counties pose a threat to jewish hegemony. This is standard M.O., go after your enemies while using rhetoric that rallies the retarded masses to (((the cause))). I figured you of all people would see through that bullshit.
In my thread Jewish influence in China, I showed that jews helped the Chinese bring about the communist revolution in that country, and that they have been close advisers to Chinese leaders for at least a century. I showed that jews build and run Chinese hospitals. I showed that the most important jew-controlled Western companies have close business ties to the mass-murdering Chinese regime. I showed that Pissrael is making big trade pacts with China. I showed that Chinese media outlets portray jews in a positive way. Those are just some examples.

What have the pro-Chinese VNN members shown in this thread? A couple of op-eds by journalists who may or may not be jews who criticize the Chinese regime for its human rights abuses? That's not enough to convince me that the jews want to drag the US into a war with China.

Quote:
Neither have I. I can even take a screenshot of my recent thumbs given page to prove it if requested.
Oh no, that's okay.
 
Old December 18th, 2020 #37
Crowe
Senior Member
 
Crowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stewart Meadows View Post

What has the pro-Chinese VNN members shown in this thread? A couple of op-eds by journalists who may or may not be jews who criticize the Chinese regime for its human rights abuses? That's not enough to convince me that the jews want to drag the US into a war with China.
I'm not pro-China, but on the other hand, I'm not gonna be a sucker for neocon hit pieces whining about China not being fully compliant.

I can only speculate as to why there seems to be division with regards to China among our (((enemies))).

Regardless of any jewish division with regards to China, the Chinese are not good for us. But that doesn't mean we should join in on the bash China using neocon talking points bandwagon.

But on these issues, I just don't give a flying fuck about any of this:

- them being mean to uyghur muzzies
- "free Hong Kong"
- them eating cats/dogs/bats or whatever else.
- them building islands near their borders.
- them exerting their power in Asia.
- "human rights violations"
+ Others I'm sure.

On other issues that we should actually give a shit about are largely due to the jews making backroom deals with the Chinese that negatively impact us. There is no way out of this mess but through the jew. As I've said before, I think people would be surprised how easily a lot of these other issues get sorted out if we simply get rid of our jew problem. I consider "China" one of these issues. We can defend ourselves though the assurance of mutually assured destruction via nuclear arms. The Chinese aren't that reckless.
__________________
Low-IQ bible scholars are legion, the big book o' bullshit is catnip to the underbrained. --ALEX LINDER

Last edited by Crowe; December 18th, 2020 at 06:01 PM.
 
Old December 18th, 2020 #38
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,529
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowe View Post
Fake news like news max and breitbart for example spews the same tiresome rhetoric about "Socialism", and constantly lumps China and Russia together as merica's enemies. Of course, I can read in between the lines and see that the real reason (((they're))) mad is because those counties pose a threat to jewish hegemony. This is standard M.O., go after your enemies while using rhetoric that rallies the retarded masses to (((the cause))). I figured you of all people would see through that bullshit.
The Breitbart articles that I occasionally use on VNN aren't "fake news". For example, in my Italy thread I posted the following piece from Breitbart about how Italy's crooked, unelected, anti-white, pro-rapeugee and thoroughly jew-controlled government is selling out the Italian people's interests to the mass-murdering Chinese regime:

Quote:
Chinese Companies Made €1.5 Billion from Italy During Pandemic


CHRIS TOMLINSON 11 Dec 2020

The left-wing Italian government has spent €1.57 billion on supplies from Chinese companies during the Wuhan virus pandemic.

From January 31st to November 17th, the leftist coalition spent €4.73 billion, much of which went on medical supplies and other items, with 36.25 per cent of the cash going to foreign companies.
(...)
Giorgia Meloni, leader of the national conservative Brothers of Italy (FdI) party, criticised the fact a third of the cash spent during the crisis ended up with Chinese companies.

Meloni labelled the figures “disturbing” and claimed they revealed an “absolute dependence” of the government led by Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte on the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) regime in Beijing.
(...)
“This is the worst political class in the Italian republic’s history: incapable, visionless, enslaved to foreign interests, and animated only by the desire to have a career and secure their seats,” she added.

Italy and many other European countries looked to Chinese suppliers for medical goods in the early days of the pandemic but found large amounts of the personal protection equipment (PPE) they purchased to be defective.

A report from The Spectator‘s U.S. edition in April claimed that China had forced Italy to buy coronavirus supplies that Italy itself had donated to the country just weeks before.
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/202...ring-pandemic/

Since I follow Italian-language news, I can confirm that the above article is correct. Eric Striker, on the other hand, excreted a jaw-droppingly stupid and distasteful pro-Chinese article about how Italy should be eternaly grateful to the mass-murdering Chinese regime for allegedly helping Italians by selflessly sending them (defective) COVID supplies - after infecting the entire world with the virus.
 
Old December 18th, 2020 #39
T.Garrett
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: TriState
Posts: 7,208
Post Tucky blasts the Bidens, jew Iger and China



As the MSM kicks itz anti-Russia propaganda machine back into high gear, picking up where it left off at the beginning of the Trump presidency
 
Old December 19th, 2020 #40
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,689
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stewart Meadows View Post
So you deny that Joe Biden is a China-puppet? That's strange... You're probably the only person on VNN who hasn't heard about his son Cunter's crooked business dealings with the mass-murdering Chinese regime. You know, the business dealings that the jewish media and jewish tech companies have done their best to ignore, even going so far as to suppress news stories about them.
I'm with Anglin on this one.

''The conservative media has been pumping up a “Biden is controlled by the Chinese” conspiracy theory for months, basically doing their own version of the Democrats’ Russian conspiracy theory. (While there is more evidence than for the Russia hoax, I don’t think what they’re saying is true. Biden’s deals with China were basic pay-to-play scams with Chinese companies, not a secret plan by the Chinese government to take over American politics. The theories have been proved stupid when Biden lined his cabinet with anti-China hawks. He’s going to be a lot more aggressive with China than Trump was, if he takes office. The theory is a dumb distraction to take responsibility away from those responsible – Jews, frankly – and put it on people on the other side of the planet."
__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race


''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers
 
Reply

Tags
china vs zog

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:42 AM.
Page generated in 0.40410 seconds.