|
March 11th, 2018 | #61 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
|
So you think we should let the jews have Hitler, and drop all attachments to the 3rd Reich? Even if they were right about a whole lot of things? And had some great ideas?
__________________
Low-IQ bible scholars are legion, the big book o' bullshit is catnip to the underbrained. --ALEX LINDER |
March 12th, 2018 | #62 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 556
|
No I think that he lost so hard that he helped the Jews 100 times more than he hurt them. Does this mean that I think he was secretly part if this plan? Not really. Possibly. The Jews could easily have used him to propagandize without his his approval or involvement. He also easily could have lived out his days to old age in luxury some where even if it had to be in forced seclusion either way just as Napoleon did.
|
March 12th, 2018 | #63 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
|
Quote:
Quote:
Jews are against any Whites countries being Nationalist purely for White interests, period. Whites forming Nationalist countries is contrary to the jew's parasitic survival strategy. They're a race of vagrants who have no loyalty to anyone but themselves. Any Nationalism which includes jews is kosher, and contrary to our own long term survival strategy. If we can't learn a simple lesson from history that it's an extremely terrible idea to let jews "piggy back" on our countries, then we're doomed to repeat previous failures. Next time, we better fucking get it right. And getting it right means no fucking jews. Quote:
__________________
Low-IQ bible scholars are legion, the big book o' bullshit is catnip to the underbrained. --ALEX LINDER Last edited by Crowe; March 12th, 2018 at 08:22 AM. |
|||
March 12th, 2018 | #64 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 556
|
Well I guess I should stay away from the Jews then. They said soon they would change my name to Jebediah Jewbergstein and chop part of my dick off.
|
March 15th, 2018 | #65 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Physically located in South America, with the heart firmly in Old Tennessee.
Posts: 5
|
Contributions to the forum may be 'Chinese walls'
IMPORTANT WARNING: THIS IS A MASSIVE WALL OF TEXT
Readers who feel intimidated by lofty walls are strongly recommended to stop reading at this point. Those who are utterly incapable of sustained intellectual concentration, or who suffer from high amounts of attention deficit, or whose intellectual levels happen to be below minimal standards of safety, are respectfully requested to quit from the daunting task of trying to peruse the following lines. Reader discretion is advised. Gentlemen, After that humorous introduction, which is not intended as a criticism, let us tackle more seriously and in some detail the problem at hand: What is considered acceptable extension for written contributions to VNN ? Different contributors to the forum of Vanguard News Network have formed different ideas about that point. For most, the forum is just a chat room for interchange of short comments, tips or opinions, similar to a typical bulletin board of the 1980's, or to a typical channel of Internet Relay Chat in more recent times, except for the facts that the forum software offers many more resources than a classic bulletin board, and that the conversation is not kept in real time, as it is in the IRC protocol. For other contributors the forum is a place where they can offer news of recent events, reviews of various resources (such as books, songs, films), or personal views that may be of interest to other members of the forum, and which require some length for sufficient exposition or explanation. Finally, for a few contributors the forum is also capable of being used as a library, a cultural centre or an academic institution, where visitors or members find plenty of materials for study, or of sources for reference or research, and where scholars armed with huge doses of patience calmly take their time for extensive production of their intellectual work. In the case of CSS Dixieland, it is the latter form of contribution that is intended. The other two forms are also respectable and valid, but for other members of Vanguard News Network, not for CSS Dixieland. It is our aim to provide our readers with detailed information, carefully researched and correctly written in a variety of languages, with references pointing to relevant sources where interested readers will find abundance of other materials offered in different presentations (text, image, audio, video), thus being able, if they so wish, to increase their knowledge about the subject of their intellectual curiosity, and refine their understanding. The topics chosen by CSS Dixieland may dive into an ample diversity of disciplines, more or less specialised, and always requiring some previous familiarity from the part of the reader. Characteristic essays are about History, Philosophy, pure or applied Science, and a wide assortment of technical or artistical endeavours. In the case of contributions sent by us to Vanguard News Network, it is needless to say that they should be, hopefully, of some interest to those persons who are aware of the racial problem, and whose desire is to build a solid background of expertise as the best way for confronting the liberal fallacies that are, sadly, so prevalent in the contemporary World (mainly after the year 1945). Such a task cannot be executed in only a few lines. It is necessary to present 'a massive wall of text', as some member has commented. It is understood that his comment has been made as constructive criticism, without any hint of derision or offence, and as such it has been taken. However, for CSS Dixieland, it is impossible to avoid the massive wall. Our manner of contributing is precisely that manner, by building colossal walls of text with gigantic amounts of information, and then leaving to the discretion of the reader whether to climb the wall or not, and if summoning the courage for surmounting the wall, whether to do it in only one session, or to distribute his efforts into several sessions of study. Another member has, very correctly, pointed to the possibility that some persons of doubtful intentions might feel tempted to discourage further contributions of CSS Dixieland, by indulging into the time-honoured but not very noble method of the destructive criticism, or even by flavouring their negative comments with personal epithets of low level and bad taste. This kind of individuals are easily recognisable. Unfortunately they exist in every place, whether it be a forum in the World Wide Web, or a group in Usenet (News Network Control Protocol), or the classic bulletin board by telephone line, or Internet Relay Chat, or Telnet, or any other form of interaction where members are not screened prior to their admission. The solution to that problem does not depend on CSS Dixieland, but on the moderators of Vanguard News Network. How they perform their duties in the time-consuming task of moderating a forum with hundreds (or thousands) of members, makes a great amount of the difference from one forum to another. CSS Dixieland has already contributed to other Internet fora, either with its entity name (which encompasses the temporary collaboration of other individuals), or with the personal name of he who is writing these lines, P. A. Stonemann. Some of those fora are, or were until recently, very well known to racially aware persons world-wide. It is fair to say that, with rare exceptions, most of those places for interchange of racially valuable information, have not raught the minimum standard expected by CSS Dixieland. Or in other words, the task of moderation was VERY POORLY performed in most of them. In one case, of a forum of great renown that closed short time ago, even a moderator indulged, himself, in unacceptable behaviour. Such cases had as unavoidable consequence the termination of all of our contributions. So, the risk is real. CSS Dixieland might publish in Vanguard News Network a well researched and detailed document about some subject of, for instance, historical interest, and receive as one of the many replies an unacceptable, destructive criticism, which provides no further information, it does not correct possible mistakes in our text, it offers no new perspective on the subject of study or on related subjects, it lists no relevant references, or it even contains clearly offensive remarks. Those things have happened. It is for that reason that we have been cautious in our dealings with this forum. After for example four postings, we wait and see the reaction of the other members. In the meantime, there are other Internet resources that we can use. Whenever there be a reaction from even only one member, we know. If constructive and positive, then we give focus to that Internet resource in preference to others. If destructive or negative, then the resource is erased, probably for ever. If indifferent reply or no reply, we continue waiting. Patience is a virtue, and time is not a scarce resource for us. For finishing this mastodontic wall of text, CSS Dixieland requests from other members of Vanguard News Network to have the kindness of expressing their views on the subject, but to do so in a correct and respectful way. Therefore, moderators of the forum are strongly encouraged to exercise their authority against those members who might abuse of the privilege of posting in this board. Failure to comply with this request might have as consequence the temporary or definitive termination of part or all of our contributions. A possible solution would be publishing our essays in a section of the forum where other members or visitors will be able to read but not to write, this is, in some kind of Web log inside the forum, where only the titular member and the system administrator have the necessary privileges for writing. CSS Dixieland wishes to express gratitude to Mister Randolph Dilloway, for his support and his understanding. It is rewarding to fight our struggle beside Comrades of his quality: honest, courageous, and intelligent. It is an honour to be a member of VNN forum, and to contribute to it. Receive, Gentlemen, our best wish for the Final Victory of our Noble Cause. Dixieland for ever ! P. A. Stonemann, CSS Dixieland March 2018 |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|