Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old March 11th, 2018 #61
Crowe
Senior Member
 
Crowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adolf Goldbergstein View Post
The Jews adopted me.
So you think we should let the jews have Hitler, and drop all attachments to the 3rd Reich? Even if they were right about a whole lot of things? And had some great ideas?
__________________
Low-IQ bible scholars are legion, the big book o' bullshit is catnip to the underbrained. --ALEX LINDER
 
Old March 12th, 2018 #62
Adolf Goldbergstein
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 556
Default

No I think that he lost so hard that he helped the Jews 100 times more than he hurt them. Does this mean that I think he was secretly part if this plan? Not really. Possibly. The Jews could easily have used him to propagandize without his his approval or involvement. He also easily could have lived out his days to old age in luxury some where even if it had to be in forced seclusion either way just as Napoleon did.
 
Old March 12th, 2018 #63
Crowe
Senior Member
 
Crowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adolf Goldbergstein View Post
No I think that he lost so hard that he helped the Jews 100 times more than he hurt them.
I don't think there is any doubt that (((they))) fully took advantage of the post-WW2 climate. But that doesn't mean someone shouldn't try to fight back just because there is a chance of losing, and consequences for losing. The Germans did as good as anyone has in recent times. Mistakes were made, sure, but they had some great ideas.

Quote:
Does this mean that I think he was secretly part if this plan? Not really. Possibly. The Jews could easily have used him to propagandize without his his approval or involvement.
If the Germans had won, the end result wouldn't have been good for jews. Jews fear National Socialism. It's pretty much banned in most of Europe. If it was good for jews, they wouldn't need to ban it.

Jews are against any Whites countries being Nationalist purely for White interests, period. Whites forming Nationalist countries is contrary to the jew's parasitic survival strategy. They're a race of vagrants who have no loyalty to anyone but themselves.

Any Nationalism which includes jews is kosher, and contrary to our own long term survival strategy. If we can't learn a simple lesson from history that it's an extremely terrible idea to let jews "piggy back" on our countries, then we're doomed to repeat previous failures. Next time, we better fucking get it right. And getting it right means no fucking jews.

Quote:
He also easily could have lived out his days to old age in luxury some where even if it had to be in forced seclusion either way just as Napoleon did.
You don't actually buy that "Hunting Hitler" bullshit they've been running on the electric jew, do you? It's a show that's running on the History (Hitler) Channel, in case anyone was wondering. (((They're))) never going to stop "Hunting Hitler". They see Hitler in places and in things that a sane might could never imagine.
__________________
Low-IQ bible scholars are legion, the big book o' bullshit is catnip to the underbrained. --ALEX LINDER

Last edited by Crowe; March 12th, 2018 at 08:22 AM.
 
Old March 12th, 2018 #64
Adolf Goldbergstein
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 556
Default

Well I guess I should stay away from the Jews then. They said soon they would change my name to Jebediah Jewbergstein and chop part of my dick off.
 
Old March 15th, 2018 #65
CSS Dixieland
Registered User
 
CSS Dixieland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Physically located in South America, with the heart firmly in Old Tennessee.
Posts: 5
Default Contributions to the forum may be 'Chinese walls'

IMPORTANT WARNING: THIS IS A MASSIVE WALL OF TEXT

Readers who feel intimidated by lofty walls are strongly recommended to
stop reading at this point. Those who are utterly incapable of sustained
intellectual concentration, or who suffer from high amounts of attention
deficit, or whose intellectual levels happen to be below minimal standards
of safety, are respectfully requested to quit from the daunting task of
trying to peruse the following lines. Reader discretion is advised.

Gentlemen,

After that humorous introduction, which is not intended as a criticism,
let us tackle more seriously and in some detail the problem at hand:

What is considered acceptable extension for written contributions to VNN ?

Different contributors to the forum of Vanguard News Network have formed
different ideas about that point. For most, the forum is just a chat room
for interchange of short comments, tips or opinions, similar to a typical
bulletin board of the 1980's, or to a typical channel of Internet Relay
Chat in more recent times, except for the facts that the forum software
offers many more resources than a classic bulletin board, and that the
conversation is not kept in real time, as it is in the IRC protocol.

For other contributors the forum is a place where they can offer news of
recent events, reviews of various resources (such as books, songs, films),
or personal views that may be of interest to other members of the forum,
and which require some length for sufficient exposition or explanation.

Finally, for a few contributors the forum is also capable of being used as
a library, a cultural centre or an academic institution, where visitors or
members find plenty of materials for study, or of sources for reference or
research, and where scholars armed with huge doses of patience calmly take
their time for extensive production of their intellectual work.

In the case of CSS Dixieland, it is the latter form of contribution that
is intended. The other two forms are also respectable and valid, but for
other members of Vanguard News Network, not for CSS Dixieland. It is our
aim to provide our readers with detailed information, carefully researched
and correctly written in a variety of languages, with references pointing
to relevant sources where interested readers will find abundance of other
materials offered in different presentations (text, image, audio, video),
thus being able, if they so wish, to increase their knowledge about the
subject of their intellectual curiosity, and refine their understanding.

The topics chosen by CSS Dixieland may dive into an ample diversity of
disciplines, more or less specialised, and always requiring some previous
familiarity from the part of the reader. Characteristic essays are about
History, Philosophy, pure or applied Science, and a wide assortment of
technical or artistical endeavours. In the case of contributions sent by
us to Vanguard News Network, it is needless to say that they should be,
hopefully, of some interest to those persons who are aware of the racial
problem, and whose desire is to build a solid background of expertise as
the best way for confronting the liberal fallacies that are, sadly, so
prevalent in the contemporary World (mainly after the year 1945).

Such a task cannot be executed in only a few lines. It is necessary to
present 'a massive wall of text', as some member has commented. It is
understood that his comment has been made as constructive criticism,
without any hint of derision or offence, and as such it has been taken.

However, for CSS Dixieland, it is impossible to avoid the massive wall.
Our manner of contributing is precisely that manner, by building colossal
walls of text with gigantic amounts of information, and then leaving to
the discretion of the reader whether to climb the wall or not, and if
summoning the courage for surmounting the wall, whether to do it in only
one session, or to distribute his efforts into several sessions of study.

Another member has, very correctly, pointed to the possibility that some
persons of doubtful intentions might feel tempted to discourage further
contributions of CSS Dixieland, by indulging into the time-honoured but
not very noble method of the destructive criticism, or even by flavouring
their negative comments with personal epithets of low level and bad taste.

This kind of individuals are easily recognisable. Unfortunately they exist
in every place, whether it be a forum in the World Wide Web, or a group in
Usenet (News Network Control Protocol), or the classic bulletin board by
telephone line, or Internet Relay Chat, or Telnet, or any other form of
interaction where members are not screened prior to their admission.

The solution to that problem does not depend on CSS Dixieland, but on the
moderators of Vanguard News Network. How they perform their duties in the
time-consuming task of moderating a forum with hundreds (or thousands) of
members, makes a great amount of the difference from one forum to another.

CSS Dixieland has already contributed to other Internet fora, either with
its entity name (which encompasses the temporary collaboration of other
individuals), or with the personal name of he who is writing these lines,
P. A. Stonemann. Some of those fora are, or were until recently, very well
known to racially aware persons world-wide. It is fair to say that, with
rare exceptions, most of those places for interchange of racially valuable
information, have not raught the minimum standard expected by CSS Dixieland.

Or in other words, the task of moderation was VERY POORLY performed in most
of them. In one case, of a forum of great renown that closed short time ago,
even a moderator indulged, himself, in unacceptable behaviour. Such cases
had as unavoidable consequence the termination of all of our contributions.

So, the risk is real. CSS Dixieland might publish in Vanguard News Network
a well researched and detailed document about some subject of, for instance,
historical interest, and receive as one of the many replies an unacceptable,
destructive criticism, which provides no further information, it does not
correct possible mistakes in our text, it offers no new perspective on the
subject of study or on related subjects, it lists no relevant references,
or it even contains clearly offensive remarks. Those things have happened.

It is for that reason that we have been cautious in our dealings with this
forum. After for example four postings, we wait and see the reaction of the
other members. In the meantime, there are other Internet resources that we
can use. Whenever there be a reaction from even only one member, we know.
If constructive and positive, then we give focus to that Internet resource
in preference to others. If destructive or negative, then the resource is
erased, probably for ever. If indifferent reply or no reply, we continue
waiting. Patience is a virtue, and time is not a scarce resource for us.

For finishing this mastodontic wall of text, CSS Dixieland requests from
other members of Vanguard News Network to have the kindness of expressing
their views on the subject, but to do so in a correct and respectful way.

Therefore, moderators of the forum are strongly encouraged to exercise their
authority against those members who might abuse of the privilege of posting
in this board. Failure to comply with this request might have as consequence
the temporary or definitive termination of part or all of our contributions.

A possible solution would be publishing our essays in a section of the forum
where other members or visitors will be able to read but not to write, this
is, in some kind of Web log inside the forum, where only the titular member
and the system administrator have the necessary privileges for writing.

CSS Dixieland wishes to express gratitude to Mister Randolph Dilloway,
for his support and his understanding. It is rewarding to fight our struggle
beside Comrades of his quality: honest, courageous, and intelligent.

It is an honour to be a member of VNN forum, and to contribute to it.

Receive, Gentlemen, our best wish for the Final Victory of our Noble Cause.

Dixieland for ever !

P. A. Stonemann, CSS Dixieland
March 2018
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:13 AM.
Page generated in 0.79748 seconds.