Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old March 17th, 2018 #21
Adolf Goldbergstein
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 556
Default

The last one I took that was employment based all they had was spatial relations, abstract reasoning, mechanical, basic math on the tests. They would fear being called culturally biased. They would be terrified to call it an IQ test. They say aptitude test. I think they know that the tests are not culturally biased, which is actually a detriment to minorities since they did better on those parts. That study could be referring to the SAT test.
 
Old March 17th, 2018 #22
Man of the road
Senior Member
 
Man of the road's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Normal Area
Posts: 714
Default

If not calling it "culturally biased," the cultural-Marxists will completely ignore the numbers or even attempt to make a mockery of them by pointing out a less intelligent White person as "proof." They make exceptions to be norms and dismiss norms as exceptions.

They are capable of doing this to somebody who isn't necessarily less intelligent than average but who simply disagrees with their dogma of egalitarianism and other lies. The Florida teacher that was making racialist videos is a good example. I read an article where the writer tried to insult her intellect by writing something like - "she belongs to the group with the supposedly higher IQ but couldn't conceal her online identity."

That's how they operate, they won't address any scientific realities or social patterns, but would rather go for the lowest hanging fruit to attack.
__________________
White people need an anti-defamation league more than anyone. What "anti-semites" say about jews is true and hence can not be defamation.
 
Old May 21st, 2018 #23
Adolf Goldbergstein
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 556
Default

Some scientific comparisons.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	cfe69c104427f1fa68e6a131f51ce641.jpg
Views:	18
Size:	62.1 KB
ID:	10175   Click image for larger version

Name:	Heckl for jonsm.JPG
Views:	27
Size:	285.5 KB
ID:	10176   Click image for larger version

Name:	i-e56bc0204d64eda806401fd5d75d885d-hottentotvenus3.JPG
Views:	22
Size:	27.9 KB
ID:	10177   Click image for larger version

Name:	250px-Races_and_skulls.jpg
Views:	20
Size:	8.8 KB
ID:	10179  

Last edited by Adolf Goldbergstein; May 21st, 2018 at 04:51 PM.
 
Old May 21st, 2018 #24
Skinhead Zack
Senior Member
 
Skinhead Zack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Vinland
Posts: 617
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adolf Goldbergstein View Post
Some scientific comparisons.
Good analysis.


The fact that the Negroes are unevolved monkeys is apparent in their behavior as well, just like in their skull shape, facial features, etc.


 
Old May 21st, 2018 #25
Karl Lueger
Senior Member
 
Karl Lueger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Beograd
Posts: 3,186
Default

A nigger is just life support system for a primitive ape like creature; treating a nigger as human is proof of liberal stupidity.. even the jews know that about their tools for destroying human society
__________________
"To survive a war, you gotta become war."

Rambo, John J.
 
Old May 21st, 2018 #26
StanSikorski
Mechanic
 
StanSikorski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: On a darkening planet
Posts: 1,469
Default

__________________
GAS THE 2%ers
Not even Tweezer Men to sort 'em out
 
Old May 23rd, 2018 #27
Adolf Goldbergstein
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 556
Default

Some new images. A few not negroid but I feel they fit in. The theory about people from India migrated to Australia 50 to 70 thousand years ago. They also say now that the Aboriginal have an unclassified subhuman in their genome. My guess is the Indians fucked some ape creatures when they got there followed by tens of thousands of years of inbreeding and there you go.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	download.jpeg
Views:	13
Size:	8.7 KB
ID:	10180   Click image for larger version

Name:	images.jpeg
Views:	16
Size:	7.9 KB
ID:	10181   Click image for larger version

Name:	aborig2.jpg
Views:	11
Size:	11.2 KB
ID:	10183   Click image for larger version

Name:	king_billy_age_55.jpg
Views:	16
Size:	57.9 KB
ID:	10184   Click image for larger version

Name:	twilight-zone-pig.jpg
Views:	25
Size:	27.7 KB
ID:	10186  

Attached Images
  

Last edited by Adolf Goldbergstein; May 23rd, 2018 at 11:30 AM.
 
Old May 23rd, 2018 #28
Skinhead Zack
Senior Member
 
Skinhead Zack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Vinland
Posts: 617
Default

Blacks and Asians both look like apes in my opinion.
While the Negroes look more like gorillas, Orientals more like monkeys.
For example, both have coarse black hair, flat, wide noses, lack of body / facial hair and other less "mature" features compared to Whites.
The only thing that differentiates Gooks from Negroes, aside from skin color is that they have high IQs I think. despite that, they are still so backwards.. not as much fucked up as Negroes or Mexicans, though.


Speaking of Blacks, even Google photos recognized 'em as gorillas.
This picture's another damning proof that Jigaboos have vicious ape genes in them.








Google Photos Tags Black People as “Gorillas” – uthinki








Plus they both seem to be fond of shiny objects.

Gamasutra: Armando Marini's Blog - Of Monkeys and Shiny Things

Quote:
I was exposed to some interesting behaviour from primates, especially those living in close proximity to humans. In a very literal sense, the monkeys were attracted to shiny objects in and around human beings.















East Asians do look like monkeys too.











Negroes are the least evolved race hands down.

But both Blacks and Asians are mixed with monkeys I guess.

Unlike Blacks, Asians have Neanderthal genes like Whites, in higher amounts, though.

Neanderthals interbred for longer with East Asian humans, DNA reveals | Daily Mail Online

Last edited by Skinhead Zack; May 23rd, 2018 at 03:22 PM.
 
Old May 23rd, 2018 #29
Dawn Cannon
Senior Member
 
Dawn Cannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The Vampire Ball
Posts: 6,409
Default

 
Old May 23rd, 2018 #30
Jim Harting
Senior Member
 
Jim Harting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,285
Default

I have a bone to pick (so to speak) with your thread title.

It is more likely that non-Whites are evolving along different evolutionary vectors than White people (Aryans, in particular), rather than that they are behind us in evolutionary development. In other words, they are continuing to evolve, only not in the same direction as we are.

Different root stocks of the same species will evolve into separate species, based on the different ecological niches that they inhabit. (This is what Darwin meant by "survival of the fittest": those who are most fit to thrive in an environmental niche have a survival advantage in passing on their genes; it is how speciation arises).

Given a million million years, Negroes, etc., will never evolve into White people.
__________________
NEW ORDER Website: http://theneworder.org
NEW ORDER on GAB: https://gab.ai/NEW_ORDER
NS Publications: http://nspublications.com
VNN National Socialist Union: https://vnnforum.com/group.php?groupid=58
 
Old May 24th, 2018 #31
Adolf Goldbergstein
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 556
Default

Well I agree and not. The idea that they will catch up with us so to speak is absurd. They won't even progress in our direction even if we threw them a rope and dragged them behind us. Not all people from Africa are the same. There are at least 5 distinct subgroups. All as dumb as dog turds and will never change. Similar to the chimp or silverback. The country should be gated off from the rest of the world. No one should have brought them cars, guns, etc. Shortsided money hungry people should have never taken them away from their country. Sub saharan at most should have been a wildlife preserve.

The ones in America are muts. Part white, part native American, there IQ's are 15 points higher, just enough to cause trouble. Some are much larger than their counterparts, selective dog type breeding for strength for slave work, now a danger to us. According to American TV everyone is mixed breed but also gay so I guess they will die out.
 
Old May 31st, 2018 #32
Sean Gruber
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,465
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adolf Goldbergstein View Post
money hungry people should have never taken them away from their country. Sub saharan at most should have been a wildlife preserve.
Jews owned the slave ships. They ran the slave trade.
__________________
No jews, just right

Less talk, more action
 
Old June 2nd, 2018 #33
Skinhead Zack
Senior Member
 
Skinhead Zack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Vinland
Posts: 617
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean Gruber View Post
Jews owned the slave ships. They ran the slave trade.
Goy Guide to World History (3 Spain Holland Slavery Poland & the Pale


Yes, Jews owned Negroes, as well as people from all the other non-Jewish races as slaves.

They have victimized countless non-Jewish people throughout the thousands of years.

The Jewish Religion’s Position on the Slave Trade and Sexual Abuse: The Shocking Truth! – David Duke.com

These parasites live among us.
Sometimes they pretend to be us when they commit the crime, but they don't think like us. they will always think like dirty rats they really are.

As long as there are Jews on this planet, there will always be wars, corruption, decadence, crime, tyranny, and of course slavery.

Without them the world will be a better place for anyone, of any race.

White countries will always be White and the non-Whites will always be in their countries.
 
Old June 2nd, 2018 #34
Skinhead Zack
Senior Member
 
Skinhead Zack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Vinland
Posts: 617
Default Negro monkey encyclopedia picture

Negro monkey encyclopedia picture.



Last edited by Skinhead Zack; June 2nd, 2018 at 10:19 AM. Reason: Typo
 
Old June 10th, 2018 #35
Skinhead Zack
Senior Member
 
Skinhead Zack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Vinland
Posts: 617
Default

An article from Renegade.



Is It “Racist” to Think Blacks Look Like Primates?


Quote:
March 19, 2015 DaxxSteel 73 Comments

Let’s carefully release the secret from out of the bag. African Americans, in many cases, do resemble Apes. So what!? Fired pseudo celebrity Rodner Figueroa Star of Univision claimed the first Lady resembled a character on Planet of the Apes. His exact words were, “Mind you, you know that Michelle Obama looks like, she’s part of the cast of Planet of the Apes, the film.”




Let’s get real, for any self respecting person of any color to simply dismiss this phenomenon as racist is an unworthy fabricator that should never express his/herself publicly again. A large percentage of (un-mixed) black Americans closely bear a resemblance to apes and monkeys, perhaps there’s no biological relation, but the physical likeness is there. Can I get an Amen?




For decades one of the greatest centers to play the game was New York Knicks’s star Patrick Ewing, he looked like he followed Sigourney Weaver straight out of the Mist. This wasn’t just some off color remark at a Joe Biden charity dinner event. The whole world was claiming Patrick to be the missing link, whether silently or not. So why stop there?




Now it’s taken time, some uncomfortable moments, and yes some physical altercations to compile the following list of celebrities, but I needed it for the integrity of my article. I surveyed both black and white as well as some Puerto Ricans to compile a fair variety of subjects. I also posed the idea, of whether this is even a fair question. The most ironic result from this was that mostly whites felt offended and insulted by the question.




An enormous amount of subjects declared 50 Cent as a straight up (a definite) primate with the rest of the list rounding out like this, in no specific order: Arsenio Hall, Wesley Snipes, Dionne Warwick, Danny Glover, Michelle Obama, George Bush (not everyone got the question, but I do see the resemblance), and Serena & Venus Williams. The list is actually much longer, but my point isn’t to prove blacks resemble primates. My question is, if indeed an above average amount of African Americans bare likeness to primates is it racist to say so? And if so why?




Is it because they are black? We can’t ask why they (blacks) make up only 13% of the population but account for over 50% of America’s murder? Is it racist to ask why they turn successful thriving urban areas like Detroit into a wasteland of savagery annihilated by a poverty bomb?

Are these statistics racist? In Atlanta, African-Americans are 54 percent of the population, but are responsible for 100 percent of homicide, 95 percent of rape, 94 percent of robbery, 84 percent of aggravated assault, and 93 percent of burglary. Source: APD Uniform Crime Reports, Apr 2011 to Apr 2012

Are these statistics racist? According to that 2009 crime report put together by the Chicago Police Department, Black people are responsible for 75 percent of the murder; 66 percent of the criminal assaults; 57 percent of the robbery; 65 percent of the aggravated assault; and 73 percent of the aggravated battery, for a whopping 64 percent of the total violent crime.

But enough of these boring stats, it seems “racist” to mention anything about the black culture that rings negative. So says the wealthy white liberal elite and their high priced goons like Sharpton and Jackson. I have yet to hear Sharpton enlighten his blood lusting tribal crowds that blacks are much more likely to attack whites than vice versa! Yet whites alone are subjugated to silence by the thought police, dare they associate the likeness of a African with that of a monkey.

Daxx Steel is risking all, by risking nothing, when I declare to anyone who might read this essay or have it read to them and not agree with this observation. I declare in 2015, anyone with 20/20 vision or quality spectacles who may look at certain number of Africans and not admit that at least a few bare the likeness of a primate to be a liar, a shameful liar at that, who should be bared from reproducing.

Is looking like a primate a bad thing? That is the next inevitable piece of this discussion. Off the tip top of my head, I say no.



http://www.renegadetribune.com/racis...like-primates/
 
Old June 10th, 2018 #36
Skinhead Zack
Senior Member
 
Skinhead Zack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Vinland
Posts: 617
Default

As a gamer, I've always thought Donkey Kong was depicting a nigger who likes to kidnap White women and rape them.

Sorry if this is off topic though.

The game was made by the Japanese.

Maybe these Japs were right in the way they represented an ape.




Here are some early artwork from the game series:











Apparently some SJW cunt also thought it was.
Below is the comment.


Quote:
Donkey Kong...amusing game of an ape gone mad or the symbol of the white man's fear of African American sexual prowess?

Sure it seems like a simple game of an ape throwing barrels at a carpenter (this game occured before Mario became a plumber), but looking deeper at Donkey Kong we find that the video game is an enditement of black men on the level of Birth of a Nation.

Consider this: the plot of the game is that an ape goes mad and steals Mario's girldfriend Pauline.
Now in this seemingly simple plot, we see some major racial symbolism.
Apes are traditionally representative of black men, who were treated like animals for so much of their lives.
So what we really have here is a black man kidnapping a white woman.
Why does he kidnap her? We have no reason; Donkey Kong himself is an unreasoning beast.
One can only assume that his attraction to Pauline is in fact some perverted sexual desire and the DK plans on raping the poor girl once he has dispensed with Mario. Naturally, Mario seeks to save his woman. Mario himself is a racial stereotype, a short greasy Italian carpenter.
Is it any coincidence that Mario's ethnicity originates in Italy, home of the ancient Roman empire, or that he himself shares the same professions as Jesus Christ?
In fact, as the player controls Mario, we find that the jumpman has the ability to revive himself from the dead, thus completing the analogy.
What we have is a holy figure, a Christ figure, pursuing a symbol of black sexual aggression.

In the first level of Donkey Kong, the title ape does not use any sort of jungle weaponry to face Mario. Rather, they face off in some sort of factory, with DK hurling barrels at Mario as he seeks to reach the top of the level.
This stage suggests that the black man has become dangerous living within white society; that he can use white folks' own tools as weapons against the status quo.
While Doney kong throws tools at Mario, the carpenter has his own weapons to rely upon.
The hammers hanging in the level make obvious tools of attack, and yet Mario, following the pacifistic ways of Christ, uses them as tools.
Rather than attack his kidnapper, he smashes the oncoming barrels with the sledges.
The first level of the video reinforces the old and very racist stereotypes that the white man is smarter than the inherently violent and foolhardy black man.

Level two continues the factory setting, but adds some twists to it. Now Mario must contend with multiple fireballs as well as some sort of unidentifiable spring things.
The weapons that DK uses are still man-made, but they are more mysterious than the simple barrel, suggesting a transition to a more animalistic form of attack.
Additionally, in this level Mario gains extra points by recovering Pauline's purse and parasol. Obviously, DK does not care for Pauline's monetary possessions, which reinforces the suggestion of his intended rape.
During these first two stages, Mario simply has to get near Pauline for the level to end; DK presumably seizes her and runs away, suggesting that the black male is not only lustful but also cowardly.

By stage three, Mario must face numerous fiery ghosts. They appear out of nowhere and serve Donkey Kong's bidding, suggesting a possible voodoo magic at work.
Worse still, Mario cannot usually jump over the ghosts, and must rely on the hammers to defeat them.
Blessed with his holy might, Mario has no problem dispensing these evil spirits, marking the first time that the carpenter strikes out at his sentient enemies.
Once again, Pauline's parasol and purse appear; apparently Mario gave them back to her but DK threw them away again.
Perhaps he sees them as symbols of wealth, something that a black man in America can never have.
Also once again, DK is portrayed as a stupid beast, and simply stands around dancing as Mario removes the floor from beneath him, sending him crashing to his doom.
Even at the end of the game, the cycle begins anew, with the three levels constantly repeating themselves with increased difficulty.
Obviously, the black man is not capable of redemption and must continuously undergo punishment for him baser instincts.
This portrayal of African Americans is stunningly racist. By the year 1981, you think America and Japan would have evolved beyond such archaic views and stereotypes.

But all is not lost. When we move on to Donkey Kong Jr., we find a villainous Mario. This game marks the first and only time when the Christ-like Mario is used as a villain.
He has Donkey Kong caged, which is obviously symbolic to a return to slavery for the ape.
Additionally, you play DK's son. Of note is the fact that we have never been introduced to a Mrs. Donkey Kong, which once again reinforces the racist notion that African Americans have no family values.
In Donkey Kong Jr., Junior faces off against Mario in the jungle, meaning that Mario's rage has become so great that he is parading his conquest through his native lands.
This obviously speaks to the notion of revenge making monsters of us all.
Despite the jungle setting, Mario uses robotic crocodiles and other seemingly artificial creatures, symbolizing the white man's domestication of the wild.
In the third stage, the battle spills over into a factory.
The factory, which seems to be in the middle of the jungle, is in shambles, with electric sparks everywhere.
Obviously, we are being asked to believe that an African cannot build a working factory, and their own sheer stupidity is turned against them by Mario.

Ultimately, Mario is defeated in a manner very similar to DK's initial defeat.
Unlike Mario, Junior does not mind using violence against his foes, and kills all manner of beast, bird, and robotic crocodile with fruit.
Obviously, the black man does not share the same reverance for life that the white carpenter does.
Ultimately, DK is freed and Mario is defeated, but the fact remains that the entire trouble never would have started had the ape been able to keep his libido under control.
While Donkey Kong Jr. does serve as an enditement on slavery, the game still suggests that apes, or rather blacks, should be in a lesser role than whites in American society, nay, in the entire world.
These games serve as an argument for the "separate but equal" clause that plagued America following the emancipation of black slaves.
The games are unapologetically racist. Worse yet, they are seen as classics, reproduced in modern video games like Animal Crossing and Mario versus Donkey Kong and fully ingrained in our society.
Is that really what we want children to learn when they pick up a controller?

* * *

Aw, I kid. If you haven't been able to tell, I'm completely spewing bullshit in the above rant. Donkey Kong and Donkey Kong Jr. are not some evil racist conspiracy.
Donkey Kong is about an ape throwing barrels at a carpenter. Donkey Kong Jr. is about a man trying to kill a monkey with robotic crocodiles.
The notion that there is some sort of higher meaning to it is laughable.
However, I thought it would be nice to demonstrate how educated people tend to take something simple and fun and turn it into something appauling and offensive.
I wouldn't go as far to say that academia is bullshit, but it's got to be limited by common sense. If you really believe what I said in the above rant, please drop a barrel on your head for being so thoroughly stupid as to buy into my bullshit.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-309189-donkey-kong-is-a-racist.html

Last edited by Skinhead Zack; June 10th, 2018 at 11:30 AM. Reason: Too Many Pictures
 
Old June 10th, 2018 #37
Skinhead Zack
Senior Member
 
Skinhead Zack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Vinland
Posts: 617
Default Sorry for multi posting

Some new pictures I've got:












Last edited by Skinhead Zack; June 10th, 2018 at 09:53 AM. Reason: Adding More Pictures
 
Reply

Tags
sub-humans

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:55 PM.
Page generated in 0.13901 seconds.