Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old December 13th, 2007 #21
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 44,334
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Nick Griffin, the leader of the BNP, seemed to lose his rag and make wild accusations about the beginnings of the term "racism". He accused Leon Trotsky, one of the leaders of the Russian Revolution, of creating the term racism in his battle against Stalin. Umm... poor Nick seems to have really lost his marbles here, because the term and its usage goes way before Trotsky and Co.

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/s...d.php?t=581539
 
Old December 13th, 2007 #22
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 44,334
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

The term "racist" as I assume no one posting or reading this blog is aware, was coined by Trotsky- yes that Trotsky as a means of creating divisiveness in the United States, which he had determined would be the crown jewel in Communism's sweep across the globe- and he proved himself right as people such as the author have proven here.

http://thirdmom.blogspot.com/2006/11...-adoption.html
 
Old December 14th, 2007 #23
SMG3000
Wants Closer Ties to Iran
 
SMG3000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,734
SMG3000
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KraftAkt View Post
I have read that it was coined by Magnus Hirschfeld also a Jew.

http://www.heretical.com/miscella/racism.html

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search



Sexologist Hirschfeld
Oh, what a normal-looking old man!
 
Old December 14th, 2007 #24
richyrichard
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southeast Texas
Posts: 933
Default

Naturally, the Jew would sneer at the Czar and denounce him by way of using the term "racist" in a negative context. Russia, or Rus-Asia, was founded by the Rus, a tribe of Varangians who were Northmen or Vikings. They were Aryan. The Jews of the old Khazar kingdom were strictly confined. To cover their avarice, the Jews claimed that the Rus were simply racist and therefore had no legitimate reason to confine the "poor innocent Jew". The Jews revolted in 1917 and plundered the wealth of the Rus calling the act of theft a redistribution of the wealth, or commune-ism. Collectivism of this type is entirely of the Jews and is their way of plundering and swindling everyone else. As finance-capitalists, the Jews own and control the commune.
 
Old December 14th, 2007 #25
David Milano
Junior Member
 
David Milano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 136
David Milano
Default

I've tried my best to find primary sources for the online etymology dictionary. I've even been in contact with the copyright holder for that entry. I don't think he'll get back with me again tonight if he does at all. The limp wristed monkey acts like he can't be bothered to do much. I will post my preliminary conclusions and revise them when/if I find out for sure what his sources are. That is, only if I'm incorrect about what his sources are.

The Word Racist: A jewish Construct

By David Milano

In the early parts of the last century Americans had already been quite familiar with terms that dealt with race and reality. Terms like racialism and racialist. These words arose in the english language through the British colonial and South African experiences. These words were in popular usage not in a derogatory sense as one would think, but carried the connotations of science and practical knowledge to the people that heard them.

Against this cultural backdrop cultural marxists enter the scene after an underhanded victory in the Russian revolution. With their ideas of one humanity united they faced an American populace with a sober understanding of race. What was needed was a play on words, the sort of debate framing that has made jews famous the world over.

The word racist made its modern day appearance in the english language in 1932 as a noun. It was first found in a translation of jew Trotsky's, "The History of the Russian Revolution" done by Max Eastman.* Though, sociologically speaking, a relatively obscure book by itself would not be likely to gain traction without subsequent reinforcement.

A very similiar term was used by Magnus Hirschfeld, a German jew who fled from Germany to France and died in 1935.** That same year his book titled in the French, "Rascisme" seemed to be embraced by radical social degenerates in America with ties to jewish communism. Thus the term racist gained a firm foothold amongst America's far left radicals. Hirschfeld's struggles against decency in Germany now began to fit into the larger equation of anti-German sentiment and his railing against the supposed plight of non-Aryans at the hands of European peoples.

"Rascisme," which wasn't published in english until 1938 seems to have by that time become an adjective used to describe National Socialists and those that sympathised with them by French speakers. Before its publication and even more so afterwards, American communists were doing the same. At this time historically, jewish mania against Germany was beginning to peak and the far left which was a branch of radical jewish interests faithfully towed the party line. Though the Soviet-German pact signed in August of 1939 and the subsequent orders to stop propagandizing against the Germans issued by the comintern presented a pointed problem to communists in America. The efect of the commintern orders seemed to have mixed results and internal divisions arose. While the rage against Germans in particular became stagnant communist rhetoric against "racists" grew by leaps and bounds. On June 22nd, 1941, the comintern having been attacked, the previous orders were ignored and subsequently rescinded.

With American entry into the war later that year, the propaganda war began in earnest. With the ceaseless demonizing of Germany the once outcast communists found common cause with mainstream America. Everywhere one looked there were slurs against Germany. Overlooked by Americans facing a huge and destructive war was the fact that much of the early material in this campaign was gleened from the one readily available source of anti-German propaganda, the jewish communists. With jewish involvment in the mass media this effect intensified and eventually took on a life of its own.

During the war the racial angle in the propaganda efforts were down played or emphasized as, "Germans over and against all." The American public, though in a war, were not ready to eschew their time honored traditions of racial reality. Despite this, jewish communists at this time silently moved into positions of prominance throughout the American press.

By the end of the war the lines of the cultural struggle had been redrawn. With jews having furthered their stranglehold on American media and communism having a free hand in eastern europe. With communism secure and the position of jews in America beginning to solidify, the next phase in the demonization of common sense was about to begin.

After the war the comintern gradually began to send funds to jewish radicals and subversives in America. What started as a trickle ended in a torrent of laundered money, fake businesses and fraudulant non-profit organizations. The main goal of this campaign was to destroy the very essence of America. The communists in the east had rightly surmised that America as a nation was merely an expression of the Whites that created it, built it and sustained it. With the destruction of their identity so too, would America fall.

jews, whether athiest or religious were more then willing to aid their communist brethren. With their defacto control of the organs of mass comunications they were in a perfect position to carry out this task.

Not surprisingly, they began by using the means at their disposal to frame the debate. No longer was a man that saw the differences between the races a racialist, he was a racist. And just what was a racist? Well, the communists had long ago established that. He was a vicious and ignorant person of questionable character who was associated with the mortal enemies of all mankind, the nazis.

All this come to pass not immediately, but over time. Men were bullied here and there until those that saw it learned to be quiet. Their silence gave rise to ignorance. Which gave birth to the troubled times of today where we labor to bring light and truth to our people.

Hope has died they say. I say it has just risen.


*Credit to Jett Rink. http://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/1930/hrr/

**The Oxford English Dictionary Second Edition 1989, Francis/Linder
http://www.sovereignty.org.uk/sitein...d/oracism.html
 
Old December 14th, 2007 #26
Mike Cooper...
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 820
Mike Cooper
Default

I think faggots love words that end in 'ism' cuz they love to make lispy effeminate sounds. Faggots think in isms.

faggots have a word for people who enjoy blowing air up their ass, it's called 'Rastyphoria". People invent words for things that pertain to their world and experiences.

the real meaning of the word 'racist' is really 'fuck you, whitey'
 
Old December 14th, 2007 #27
Bardamu
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,571
Default

OED attributes racist to Trotsky do believe.
 
Old December 14th, 2007 #28
David Milano
Junior Member
 
David Milano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 136
David Milano
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bardamu View Post
OED attributes racist to Trotsky do believe.
Which version? That would fall in line with what I wrote if it refers to Max Eastman's translation of Trotsky as its first well known iteration in english.
 
Old September 7th, 2011 #29
Stonewall
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 151
Stonewall
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
Debate on this in a KT thread. I had always heard Lenin coined it in the 1920s. Reading around, I just came across claim that in fact jew Trotsky coined it.

What have you heard?
At the risk of giving you unnecessary additional ammo for your vendetta against Christianity, I think it is necessary to dispel the erroneous attribution of the term "Racism' to Trotsky, Gramsci, Lenin, or any other 20th century figure.

The earliest usage I can find dates from August, 1872. The Holy and Great pan-Orthodox Synod of the Eastern Orthodox church issued a statement on "The Heresy of Racism," wherein it stated:
Quote:
Quote:
"We renounce, censure and condemn racism, that is racial discrimination, ethnic feuds, hatreds and dissensions within the Church of Christ, as contrary to the teaching of the Gospel and the holy canons of our blessed fathers which support the holy Church and the entire Christian world, embellish it and lead it to divine godliness.”
http://www.incommunion.org/2004/12/1...esy-of-racism/

It took the Roman Catholics another 90 years to catch up, with Vatican II. The poor backward Southern Baptists didn't get fully with the program until their 1995 Convention. But they are all aboard the PC train now.
 
Old September 7th, 2011 #30
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 44,334
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stonewall View Post
At the risk of giving you unnecessary additional ammo for your vendetta against Christianity, I think it is necessary to dispel the erroneous attribution of the term "Racism' to Trotsky, Gramsci, Lenin, or any other 20th century figure.

The earliest usage I can find dates from August, 1872. The Holy and Great pan-Orthodox Synod of the Eastern Orthodox church issued a statement on "The Heresy of Racism," wherein it stated:
Quote:

http://www.incommunion.org/2004/12/1...esy-of-racism/

It took the Roman Catholics another 90 years to catch up, with Vatican II. The poor backward Southern Baptists didn't get fully with the program until their 1995 Convention. But they are all aboard the PC train now.
[I'm going to transfer this into The Verbal War subforum.]

That's quite interesting, Stonewall. A couple points: 1) re you sure someone isn't going back and substituting modern 'racism' for some other term in whichever language the Eastern Orthodox were using in 1872? 2) the idea that 'racism' was created/popularized by Trotsky/Hirschfeld is from a Sam Francis essay. He was a PhD, so it is assumed he would have that stuff nailed down. Not that it hugely matters, but it is interesting to trace it.
 
Old September 7th, 2011 #31
Tbow002
Senior Member
 
Tbow002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Northeast
Posts: 582
Tbow002
Default I thought

I thought i was Marx...

It doesn't matter anymore because it is obsolete and old 20th Century. The terms 'racist' and 'racism' are so weak now we can crush it under our boots for good and be rid of it, just like the ridiculous jew term anti-semitism. We are awake and have gone beyond the lies and propaganda now.

Their efforts at 'change' have only backfired now because they used the stupid jewish constructs far too often and against people who merely wanted something as insignificant and innocent as lower taxes. They fucked themselves and the new and hip 21st Century will embrace Euro Centrism, Ethno centrism, White Nationalism, Ethnic Nationalism, Nationalism in General, Seperatism, Diversity Preservation, etc etc.

The world has rejected the Progressives New World Order, One World Government, One race/One people garbage because they know it is wrong and that it is also racial and cultural destruction and genocide. I am happy people have chosen this course. The progressive left has a foul and disgusting agenda, created by and led by jews and their marxist and communist followers.

Our next problem will be that these leftists will now incite war, violence, and revolution since their efforts have failed poilitically and socially.
 
Old September 8th, 2011 #32
Stonewall
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 151
Stonewall
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
[I'm going to transfer this into The Verbal War subforum.]

That's quite interesting, Stonewall. A couple points: 1) re you sure someone isn't going back and substituting modern 'racism' for some other term in whichever language the Eastern Orthodox were using in 1872? 2) the idea that 'racism' was created/popularized by Trotsky/Hirschfeld is from a Sam Francis essay. He was a PhD, so it is assumed he would have that stuff nailed down. Not that it hugely matters, but it is interesting to trace it.
I've been doing some thinking on this, at the prompting of a mutual friend.

You may have a point there, Alex. The word is phyletism, from the Greek word "phili," translated "race.". It would be good to know which word the original publication used. Frankly, I don't know.

It is possible, even likely, that the Church used the word as applied to various European nationalities. The record is replete with references to "The German race," or "The French race," etc.

Since it is not likely that there existed a race problem as we know it today within the area covered by this Church synod, it is very likely that they were not even thinking about the Bantu when they wrote this. I doubt if any Orthodox priest would have blessed a marriage between a European girl and an African savage in 1872.

Whatever the truth is on this matter, your position that the word as it has been used in the last century is an invention of our racial enemy is correct.
 
Old September 8th, 2011 #33
John Creagh
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 211
John Creagh
Default

Google has a neat feature where you can search for a word or phrase among the millions of books it has scanned.

Searching for the words "racism" or "racist" in English-language books, there are no documented instances before about 1937.

The parabolic rise of the usage of these words coincides neatly with the ascension of jews to power.

http://ngrams.googlelabs.com/graph?c...=0&smoothing=3


Click image for larger view.

Click image for larger version

Name:	racism.jpg
Views:	25
Size:	14.1 KB
ID:	7622
"Racism"





Click image for larger version

Name:	racist.jpg
Views:	25
Size:	11.9 KB
ID:	7623
"Racist"
 
Old April 5th, 2012 #34
Celtic_Patriot
Senior Member
 
Celtic_Patriot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,670
Celtic_Patriot
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Creagh View Post
Google has a neat feature where you can search for a word or phrase among the millions of books it has scanned.

Searching for the words "racism" or "racist" in English-language books, there are no documented instances before about 1937.

The parabolic rise of the usage of these words coincides neatly with the ascension of jews to power.

http://ngrams.googlelabs.com/graph?c...=0&smoothing=3


Click image for larger view.

Attachment 7352
"Racism"





Attachment 7353
"Racist"

Incorrect.

The first use of the word "racists" was in the 1930 book "History of the Russian Revolution" by Leon Trotsky.


Leon Trotsky
The History of the Russian Revolution

Volume One: The Overthrow of Tzarism

Chapter 1
Peculiarities of
Russia’s Development

Slavophilism, the messianism of backwardness, has based its philosophy upon the assumption that the Russian people and their church are democratic through and through, whereas official Russia is a German bureaucracy imposed upon them by Peter the Great. Mark remarked upon this theme: “In the same way the Teutonic jackasses blamed the despotism of Frederick the Second upon the French, as though backward slaves were not always in need of civilised slaves to train them.” This brief comment completely finishes off not only the old philosophy of the Slavophiles, but also the latest revelations of the “Racists.”

1930
Leon Trotsky

http://www.marxists.org/archive/trot...0/hrr/ch01.htm


1930. First use of the word "racists" by the Jew Leon Trotsky.





.
__________________
Красным цветом в России будет цвет коммунистических еврейств

.
 
Old April 16th, 2012 #35
Celtic_Patriot
Senior Member
 
Celtic_Patriot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,670
Celtic_Patriot
Default Trotsky had his word "Racists" published in 1932

Trotsky used the word "расистов", расист is "racist" in Russian, the "ов" is plural, thus "racists", plural.

The actual Russian of Trotsky's passage from History of the Russian Revolution, published in 1932. The manuscript was written between 1930-31.

Существование феодальных отношений в России, отрицавшееся прежними историками, можно считать позднейшими исследованиями безусловно доказанным. Более того: основные элементы русского феодализма были те же, что и на Западе. Но уже один тот факт, что феодальную эпоху пришлось устанавливать путем долгих научных споров, достаточно свидетельствует о недоношенности русского феодализма, о его бесформенности, о бедности его культурных памятников.

Отсталая страна ассимилирует материальные и идейные завоевания передовых стран. Но это не значит, что она рабски следует за ними, воспроизводя все этапы их прошлого. Теория повторяемости исторических циклов -- Вико и его позднейшие последователи -- опирается на наблюдения над орбитами старых, докапиталистических культур, отчасти -- первых опытов капиталистического развития. С провинциальностью и эпизодичностью всего процесса действительно связана была известная повторяемость культурных стадий в новых и новых очагах. Капитализм означает, однако, преодоление этих условий. Он подготовил и, в некотором смысле, осуществил универсальность и перманентность развития человечества. Этим самым исключена возможность повторяемости форм развития отдельных наций. Вынужденная тянуться за передовыми странами отсталая страна не соблюдает очередей: привилегия исторической запоздалости -- а такая привилегия существует -- позволяет или, вернее, вынуждает усваивать готовое раньше положенных сроков, перепрыгивая через ряд промежуточных этапов. Дикари сменяют лук на винтовку сразу, не проделывая пути, который пролегал между этими орудиями в прошлом. Европейские колонисты в Америке не начинали историю сначала. То обстоятельство, что Германия или Соединенные Штаты экономически опередили Англию, обусловлено как раз запоздалостью их капиталистического развития. Наоборот, консервативная анархия в британской угольной промышленности, как и в головах Макдональда и его друзей, есть расплата за прошлое, когда Англия слишком долго играла роль капиталистического гегемона. Развитие исторически запоздалой нации ведет, по необходимости, к своеобразному сочетанию разных стадий исторического процесса. Орбита в целом получает непланомерный, сложный комбинированный характер.

Возможность перепрыгивания через промежуточные ступени, разумеется, совсем не абсолютна; размеры ее определяются, в конце концов, хозяйственной и культурной емкостью страны. Отсталая нация к тому же нередко снижает заимствуемые ею извне готовые достижения путем приспособления их к своей более примитивной культуре. Самый процесс ассимиляции получает при этом противоречивый характер. Так, введение элементов западной техники и выучки, прежде всего военной и мануфактурной, при Петре I привело к усугублению крепостного права как основной формы организации труда. Европейское вооружение и европейские займы, -- и то и другое -- бесспорные продукты более высокой культуры, -- привели к укреплению царизма, тормозившего, в свою очередь, развитие страны.

Историческая закономерность не имеет ничего общего с педантским схематизмом. Неравномерность, наиболее общий закон исторического процесса, резче и сложнее всего обнаруживается на судьбе запоздалых стран. Под кнутом внешней необходимости отсталость вынуждена совершать скачки. Из универсального закона неравномерности вытекает другой закон, который, за неимением более подходящего имени, можно назвать законом комбинированного развития, в смысле сближения разных этапов пути, сочетания отдельных стадий, амальгамы архаических форм с наиболее современными. Без этого закона, взятого, разумеется, во всем его материальном содержании, нельзя понять истории России, как и всех вообще стран второго, третьего и десятого культурного призыва.

Под давлением более богатой Европы государство поглощало в России гораздо большую относительную долю народного достояния, чем на Западе, и не только обрекало этим народные массы на двойную нищету, но и ослабляло основы имущих классов. Нуждаясь в то же время в поддержке последних, оно форсировало и регламентировало их формирование. В результате бюрократизированные привилегированные классы никогда не могли подняться во весь рост, и государство в России тем больше приближалось к азиатской деспотии.

Византийское самодержавие, официально усвоенное московскими царями с начала XVI века, смирило феодальное боярство при помощи дворянства и подчинило себе дворянство, закабалив ему крестьянство, чтобы превратиться на этой основе в петербургский императорский абсолютизм. Запоздалость всего процесса достаточно характеризуется тем, что крепостное право, зародившись с конца XVI века, сложилось в XVII, достигло расцвета в XVIII и было юридически отменено лишь в 1861 году.

Духовенство, вслед за дворянством, сыграло в образовании царского самодержавия немалую роль, но вполне служебную. Церковь никогда не поднималась в России до той командующей высоты, что на католическом Западе: она удовлетворялась местом духовной прислуги при самодержавии и вменяла это в заслугу своему смирению. Епископы и митрополиты располагали властью лишь как ставленники светской власти. Патриархи сменялись вместе с царями. В петербургский период зависимость церкви от государства стала еще более рабской. 200 тысяч священников и монахов составляли в сущности часть бюрократии, своего рода полицию вероисповедания. В возмещение за это монополия православного духовенства в делах веры, его земли и доходы ограждались полицией общего порядка.

Славянофильство, мессианизм отсталости, строило свою философию на том, что русский народ и его церковь насквозь демократичны, а официальная Россия -- это немецкая бюрократия, насажденная Петром. Маркс заметил по этому поводу: "Ведь точно так же и тевтонские ослы сваливают деспотизм Фридриха II и т. д. на французов, как будто отсталые рабы не нуждаются всегда в цивилизованных рабах, чтобы пройти нужную выучку". Это краткое замечание исчерпывает до дна не только старую философию славянофилов, но и новейшие откровения "расистов".

Скудость не только русского феодализма, но и всей старой русской истории наиболее удручающее свое выражение находила в отсутствии настоящих средневековых городов как ремесленно-торговых центров6. Ремесло не успело в России отделиться от земледелия и сохраняло характер кустарничества. Старые русские города были торговыми, административными, военными и помещичьими, следовательно, потребляющими, а не производящими центрами. Даже Новгород, близкий к Ганзе и не знавший татарского ига, был только торговым, а не промышленным городом. Правда, разбросанность крестьянских промыслов по разным районам создавала потребность в торговом посредничестве широкого масштаба. Но кочующие торговцы ни в какой мере не могли занять в общественной жизни то место, которое на Западе принадлежало ремесленно-цеховой и торгово-промышленной мелкой и средней буржуазии, неразрывно связанной со своей крестьянской периферией. Главные пути русской торговли к тому же вели за границу, обеспечивая уже с отдаленных веков руководство за иностранным торговым капиталом и придавая полуколониальный характер всему обороту, в котором русский торговец был посредником между западными городами и русской деревней. Этот род экономических отношений получил дальнейшее развитие в эпоху русского капитализма и нашел свое крайнее выражение в империалистской войне.

Ничтожество русских городов, наиболее способствовавшее выработке азиатского типа государства, исключало, в частности, возможность реформации, т. е. замены феодально-бюрократического православия какой-либо модернизованной разновидностью христианства, приспособленной к потребностям буржуазного общества. Борьба против государственной церкви не возвышалась над крестьянскими сектами, включая и самую могущественную из них, староверческий раскол.

The facts of history and literature show that the mass murdering Marxist Jew Bronstein "Trotsky" invented the word "racists".



.
__________________
Красным цветом в России будет цвет коммунистических еврейств

.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:27 AM.
Page generated in 0.18915 seconds.