Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old August 22nd, 2008 #1
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,257
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default Judaism: Heritage of Hate

[In this thread, we will look at some of the figures mentioned in E. Michael Jones's works, beginning with Nicholas Donin, a jewish convert to Catholicism, and apparently the first to alert the Church to the nastinesses contained in the Talmud.]
 
Old August 22nd, 2008 #2
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,257
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

[from Wikipedia]

- Nicholas Donin (Nicolas Donin) of La Rochelle, a Jewish convert to Christianity in early thirteenth-century Paris, is known for his role in the 1240 Disputation of Paris, which resulted in a decree to publicly burn all available manuscripts of the Talmud.

- Donin was excommunicated from the ghetto of Paris by Rabbi Yechiel of Paris in the presence of the whole community and with the usual ceremonies. Having for ten years lived in the state of excommunication, though still clinging to Judaism, he was baptised into the Roman Catholic Church and joined the Franciscan Order.

- In 1238 Donin went to Rome, presented himself before Pope Gregory IX, and denounced the Talmud. Thirty-five articles were drawn up, in which Donin stated his charges of virulent attacks on the Virginity of Mary and the divinity of Jesus.

- The Pope was pursuaded of the truth of the accusations and despatched to the authorities of the Church, transcripts of the charges formulated by Donin, accompanied by an order to seize all copies of the Talmud and deposit them with the Dominicans and Franciscans. If an examination corroborated the charges of Donin, the scrolls were to be burned.

- This order was generally ignored, except in France, where the Jews were compelled under pain of death to surrender their Talmuds (March, 1240). Louis IX ordered four of the most distinguished rabbis of France -- Yechiel of Paris, Moses of Coucy, Judah of Melun, and Samuel ben Solomon of Château-Thierry -- to answer Donin in a public debate. In vain, however, did the rabbis argue against the charges of blasphemy and immorality which were the main points of Donin's arraignment. The commission condemned the Talmud to be burned. In 1242, fire was set accordingly to twenty-four carriage loads (ten to twelve-thousand volumes) of written works.
 
Old August 22nd, 2008 #3
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,257
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

A dark reminder of the Dark Ages

By Yair Sheleg

Haaretz (Israeli newspaper) June 28, 2005
(An analysis by Michael A. Hoffman II immediately follows this article)

Russia's examination of the Kitzur Shulhan Arukh - the abbreviated codex of Jewish law - to ascertain whether it constitutes racist incitement gave Prof. Yisrael Yaakov Yuval, who researches Jewish-Christian relations in the Middle Ages, the feeling of a "return to the 13th century."

Like Yuval, others who know Jewish history could only be astounded by the sensation that the Dark Ages are making a comeback. The probe of a Jewish umbrella organization in Russia for distributing a Russian translation of the book, reported in yesterday's Haaretz, is only the latest incident in a history rife with investigations of Jewish religious books containing phrases thought to be "against non-Jews." These have generally ended with mass book burnings, pogroms and anti-Semitic decrees.

The best-known such incident took place in Paris, in 1240, when Jewish apostate Nicolas Donin complained of anti-gentile comments in the Talmud. Apostates often figured in the troubles afflicting the Jews, as they were able to tell the Christians all about the Talmud. The Roman Catholic Church ordered a religious "disputation," a type of public trial in which the Jews had to defend their texts against the Christians. A short time later, the pope ordered copies of the Talmud to be captured and handed over to Dominican monks for examination.

In the decade following this edict, many copies of the Talmud were publicly burned across Europe. In 1241 the tempest led to Jewish riots in Frankfurt.

But in 1247 the Jews managed to extract an agreement from Pope Innocent IV that the Talmud, which was agreed to be essential to the Jewish faith, would no longer be burned.

In 1413 another Jewish apostate, Joshua Halorki from Spain, brought charges that the Talmud contained anti-gentile texts. Once again the Jews were summoned to a public trial in the city of Tortosa. The trial, which lasted for two years, dealt with the Talmud's purported "mistakes and heresy and insults to the Christian religion." The trial ended with decrees discriminating against Jews.

In 1509 Johannes Pfefferkorn, who had also converted from Judaism, came out against the Talmud in Germany. But this time the Jews were defended by a Christian scholar, Johannes Reuchlin, who argued that the Talmud was full of evidence that validated the truth of Christian beliefs, and this time the Talmud was not burned.

There is no doubt that Jewish law (halakha), especially that which is expressed in the Talmud, relates to Jews differently from non-Jews. This contrast is particularly evident in the Mishne Torah written by Maimonides, in which he organized all the halakhic rulings of the Talmud. For instance, it's forbidden for non-Jews to study Torah or keep the Sabbath, since these are sacred elements created for the Jews; the sentence for non-Jews who violate these injunctions is death. According to other rulings, Jews must not return lost objects belonging to non-Jews, or at most should return them only to maintain good relations.

Kabbalistic works and the writings of those influenced by the kabbala contain even more essential distinctions between Jews and gentiles. In the 20th century Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook wrote that "the difference between the Israelite soul... and the souls of all non-Jews, no matter what their level, is bigger and deeper than the difference between the human soul and the animal soul."

The Shulhan Arukh, a code of halakha compiled in the 16th century, is actually considered fairly free of these kinds of comments and rulings. Here and there some remnants exist, like the ruling (on which the Russians are apparently basing their claim) that the baby of "a non-Jewish woman should not be delivered on the Sabbath," since doing so would entail the violation of the Sabbath, and it must not be violated for the sake of a non-Jew.

Yuval, the professor of Jewish-Christian relations, said the Shulhan Arukh has been edited by Jews and by Christian censors, which was made possible by the printing press, which allowed for greater supervision of content before books were published.

The internal and external censorship has increased since the publication of the code of Jewish law, said Yuval, with the 19th-century Kitzur ["Abridged"] Shulhan Arukh, the subject of the Russian probe, even freer of anti-gentile comments than its predecessor.

"This is the first time I have come across polemic against the Shulhan Arukh," he said.

Jewish commentators have tried to remove the sting from rulings against non-Jews. In the 13th century, Rabbi Menachem Hame'iri wrote that such rulings don't apply to monotheistic religions such as Christianity or Islam, only to idol worshipers.

In any case, the discussion of Jewish law should be left to Jews, without the involvement of Russia's state prosecutor. The issue that requires reaction is the return of the darkest kind of anti-Semitism.

Dark Ages Metaphor Cannot Conceal the Reality of Judaism's Sacred Hate Literature

by Michael A. Hoffman II

Copyright © 2005 revisionisthistory.org

The author of the preceding article, the Israeli journalist Yair Sheleg, mixes "Revelation of the Method" (admitting rabbinic writings contain racist teaching about gentiles) set within familiar prognostications of a howling lynch mob ever ready to run amok on a moment's notice, as soon as any scholar casts a critical eye on the Talmud (in this case the post-Gemara lawbook of Yosef Karo, the "Shulchan Aruch").

Shehelg admits that the proto-Zionist Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook does indeed hold that "the difference between the Israelite soul... and the souls of all non-Jews, no matter what their level, is bigger and deeper than the difference between the human soul and the animal soul." In that case, Russians are right to regard that rabbinic doctrine as hate speech.

The "defense" in this instance is to invoke the spectre of a frenzied mob of (who else?) gentiles with their " mass book burnings, pogroms and anti-Semitic decrees."

The supposition here is that rabbis don't burn books, don't order the massacre of gentiles and don't issue anti-gentile decrees, which is credible only if you are captive to the George Bush/NY Times-defined concept of "American democracy" (i.e. pro-Zionist gatekeepers in command of the major media constitutes democracy).

But if you have alternate sources of information, then you may be privy to the slightly inconvenient fact that the Talmud orders the burning of Christian books; and the massacre of gentiles was ordered as recently as 2001 by the Sephardic Chief Rabbi of "Israel," Ovadia Yosef.

Anti-gentile decrees are issued with greater frequency nowadays than at any time in the past. Last year the authoritative rabbinic holy book, "Romemut Yisrael Ufarashat Hagalut" ("Jewish Superiority and the Question of Exile") was issued by Rabbi Sadya Grama of Lakewood, New Jersey.

Grama is an alumnus of Beth Medrash Govoha, a prestigious Orthodox yeshiva (Talmud school). In his book-length decree, Rabbi Grama issued the following statement, "The Jew by his source and in his very essence is entirely good. The goy, by his source and in his very essence, is completely evil. This is not simply a matter of religious distinction, but rather of two completely different species."

Yair Shehelg in his article for "Haaretz" newspaper relates with some horror the case of "apostate" Judaic converts to Christianty such as Nicholas Donin and Johannes Pfefferkorn. Donin participated in a debate with rabbis over the authentic contents of the Talmud. It was a fair fight and the rabbis lost, as they do in any fair debate with a competent Christian scholar of the Talmud. 800 years later they are still smarting from that loss and Donin remains toward the top of their perpetual, ritual hate list as a "rodef."

A few centuries later, the Judaic convert to Christianity, Pfefferkorn, heroically took on the whole of the western occult establishment during the Renaissance, when the Kabbalists had made mighty inroads into the Catholic Church through the agency of Pico della Mirandola, Franciscan Fr. Francesco Giorgi (who may be said to be the secret father of Tudor Protestantism), and Johannes Reuchlin. Sheleg writes, "Reuchlin... argued that the Talmud was full of evidence that validated the truth of Christian beliefs, and this time the Talmud was not burned."

Actually Reuchlin made this argument mainly on behalf of the Kabbalah, not the Talmud. It was equally specious, but since the contents of the Kabbalah were not well known, the fraud at first escaped detection, while Pfefferkorn was libeled and ritually denounced as a reactionary hater for daring to accuse the Kabbalah of containing pagan black magic and anti-gentile polemics.

The Kabbalah also calls Jesus and Mohammed "dead dogs," but only a few elite scholars were aware of that fact during the Renaissance and for that matter, thanks to the toadying of Pat Buchanan, Latin Mass magazine, the New American magazine and similar right wing personalities and publications of our time, few are aware of it even now.

Hopefully the Left will do a better job in disseminating the truth on this vital subject. The ominous fact that the Sanhedrin was reconstituted last October in Tiberias for the first time in 2,000 years, ought to cause sufficient alarm in at least one highly-placed editor or publisher somewhere in America who will then, at long last, grow himself a pair of testicles and expose Judaism the way Islam is being relentlessly "exposed."

But of course it costs no American publisher anything to gouge Islam, whereas to skewer Judaism in print, an editor or a publisher must steel himself and risk everything to actually practice that which the Christian Savior preached, and few "Christian" conservatives have been willing to do anything as "rash" as that. That would just be too radical a step. We might start to have victory if conservative publications were to engage in so bold an initiative.

Sheleg reports: "Jewish commentators have tried to remove the sting from rulings against non-Jews. In the 13th century, Rabbi Menachem Hame'iri wrote that such rulings don't apply to monotheistic religions such as Christianity or Islam, only to idol worshipers."

Rubbish. Christianity is hated and dsespised throughout the Talmud. Any cosmetic modifcation of the rulings are strictly for gentile consumption and are conducted episodically, whenever Judaic supremacy is obstructed and Judaic subjugation is in force. In the latter case, euphemisms and loopholes are employed and concocted in order to hoodwink and appease aroused gentiles.

Israel Shahak documents this rabbinic stratagem in his magisterial work "Jewish History, Jewish Religion" in which he shows that Judaic physicians withheld medical treatment from gentiles in certain circumstances during times of Judaic supremacy, and treated them almost without exception during times of Judaic subjugation.

Sheleg retails in the last paragraph of his article the perennial proof of the Talmudic mentality-- he argues for the exceptionalism which is the hallmark of the rabbinic mind. He writes: " In any case, the discussion of Jewish law should be left to Jews..."

Why is that? After all, the discussion of Islamic law is permitted to the New York Times, Daniel Pipes, Bernard Lewis, Franklin Graham, Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity and a slew of other non-Muslims.

It is permissible for non-Muslims to sift, scrutinize and deplore Islamic law, to demand an end to "anti-Israel incitement" in Islamic texts, but for gentiles to critically examine the Judaic law and call for an end to anti-gentile incitement in rabbinic holy books, it is an automatic precursor to "mass book burnings, pogroms and decrees"?

How many Arabs and Muslims have been murdered in a New Dark Ages crusade due to contemporary rabbinic decrees from the likes of Ovadia Yosef?

How many works like this writer's book "Judaism's Strange Gods" are banned (the modern day version of book-burning) by Barnes and Noble at the behest of the ADL?

Here is the Talmudic halakha par excellence, as exhibited by the Judaic journalist Sheleg: one rule for the sub-species gentile, and another for the lords of the universe, the rabbis.

The Talmud states that the rabbis even managed to defeat God in debate. How then would a mere "goy" dare to question them?

http://www.revisionisthistory.org/essay6.html
 
Old September 18th, 2009 #4
richyrichard
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southeast Texas
Posts: 933
Default

The Babylonian Talmud was of the Edomites who later merged with the Khazar Kingdom. The version of "judaism" adopted by the Khazars was Talmudism. Ashkenazism Jews are subsequently Talmudists. They are the founders and promoters of Political Zionism.

To their credit, all Jews are not Talmudists. Nor are all Jews Political Zionists.

But then, my very use of the Biblical term, Edomite, is somewhat CI-esque.
 
Old January 20th, 2011 #5
N. Wolf
Legionary of Truth
 
N. Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Within the Soul of Europe
Posts: 151
Blog Entries: 3
N. Wolf
Default Quotes

A few quotes from some significant Jewish figures, which show how their belief in Jewish racial supiority, obviously based on their religion (citations in parentheses after name):

“The body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of a member of any other nation of the world.... The Jewish body looks as if in substance it were similar to the bodies of non-Jews, but ... the bodies only seem to be similar in material substance, outward look, and superficial quality. The difference of the inner quality, however, is so great that the bodies should be considered as completely different species. This is the reason why the Talmud states that there is a halachic difference in attitude about the bodies of non-Jews.... Their bodies are in vain ... An even greater difference exists in regard to the soul. Two contrary types of soul exist. A non-Jewish soul comes from three satanic spheres, while the Jewish soul comes from holiness.”
- Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the "Lubavitcher Rebbe" (Israel Shahak and Norman Mezvinsky, Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel (Pluto Press, London, 1999), p. 59-60.)

“The difference between a Jewish soul and souls of non-Jews — all of them in all different levels — is greater and deeper than the difference between a human soul and the souls of cattle.”
- Rabbi Kook (also from same Shahak’s and Mezvinsky’s book Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel, p. ix.)

“We have to recognize that Jewish blood and the blood of a goy are not the same thing”
- Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg (New York Times, June 6, 1989)

“One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail”
- Rabbi Yaacov Perrin (New York Daily News, Feb. 28, 1994).

“If every simple cell in a Jewish body entails divinity, is a part of God, then every strand of DNA is part of God. Therefore, something is special about Jewish DNA.”
- Rabbi Ginsburgh (Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel, p. 62)

“If a Jew needs a liver, can you take the liver of an innocent non-Jew passing by to save him? The Torah would probably permit that. Jewish life has an infinite value. There is something infinitely more holy and unique about Jewish life than non-Jewish life.”
- Rabbi Ginsburgh (Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel, p. 62)
 
Old January 25th, 2013 #6
White Knight
Junior Member
 
White Knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 42
White Knight
Default

If people would only read the words of the so-called Jewish "holy" men, perhaps they would understand the threat that Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all represent: The subjugation of all gentiles and the eventual ascendancy of the evil "chosen" people who have created the two lesser forms of Judaism to imprison the minds of the goyim. Jews may hate Christianity and Islam, but that's because they created them.
 
Old February 19th, 2013 #7
America First
Senior Member
 
America First's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,699
America First
Default

Nothing can awaken evanjellyculls in the USSA, because they are a fanatical arrogant unread and with out honor violence loving cult of nut cases IMO.



joo's no matter the issue expose them selves and always have over played their violent loving hand.
__________________
Isn't it strange that we talk least about the things we think about most?

We cannot allow the natural passions and prejudices of other peoples
to lead our country to destruction.

-Charles A. Lindbergh
http://www.fff.org/freedom/0495c.asp

Last edited by America First; February 19th, 2013 at 02:06 AM.
 
Old October 20th, 2013 #8
John Evans
Christian Anti-Semite
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Kikesville, Hymietown
Posts: 243
John Evans
Default

Jews are hatred personified. They killed their own God and they have been trying to kill His followers ever since. They hate us with a passion that is not of this world.
 
Old October 21st, 2013 #9
Serbian_SS_Skinhead
Junior Member
 
Serbian_SS_Skinhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Vienna, born: Smederevo,Serbia
Posts: 15
Serbian_SS_Skinhead
Default

Jews believe in the antychrist that's why they killed Jesus.
I heard that the antychrist will build the Temple of Solomon again.
They say that their Messias was never on the planet which is impossible because all religions know there gods.
They also know there god they know it's the antychrist that's why they want to destroy Christianity.
Same goes for Islam.
Muslims don't believe directly in Satan but there cult and ideology us Satanic.
 
Old October 22nd, 2013 #10
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,803
Serbian
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Serbian_SS_Skinhead View Post
Jews believe in the antychrist that's why they killed Jesus.
I heard that the antychrist will build the Temple of Solomon again.
They say that their Messias was never on the planet which is impossible because all religions know there gods.
They also know there god they know it's the antychrist that's why they want to destroy Christianity.
Same goes for Islam.
Muslims don't believe directly in Satan but there cult and ideology us Satanic.

Jesus was a kike and jews gave christ-insanity to Europeans in order to enslave/destroy them.

This is a racial not religious forum.
__________________
Don Black's Stormfront ''Russians''
http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=456327
Russia Insider
https://russia-insider.com/en
 
Old October 22nd, 2013 #11
Tony Houseman
Senior Member
 
Tony Houseman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: England
Posts: 1,082
Tony Houseman
Default

Christianity, Judaism and Islam are all Middle-Eastern cults that have caused so much misery to White people.
 
Old October 22nd, 2013 #12
Serbian_SS_Skinhead
Junior Member
 
Serbian_SS_Skinhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Vienna, born: Smederevo,Serbia
Posts: 15
Serbian_SS_Skinhead
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony Houseman View Post
Christianity, Judaism and Islam are all Middle-Eastern cults that have caused so much misery to White people.
Judaism and Islam are a danger for white europe but not Christianity.
For centuries Europeans defended Europe in the name of Christianity aggainst islamic invaders and local zionists.
 
Old October 22nd, 2013 #13
Tony Houseman
Senior Member
 
Tony Houseman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: England
Posts: 1,082
Tony Houseman
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Serbian_SS_Skinhead View Post
Judaism and Islam are a danger for white europe but not Christianity.
For centuries Europeans defended Europe in the name of Christianity aggainst islamic invaders and local zionists.
Europeans have defended Europe in the name of Christianity but I think Christianity now serves no more purpose for Whites. Christianity has supported open borders, mass immigration and civil rights for non-Whites.
 
Old October 23rd, 2013 #14
Serbian_SS_Skinhead
Junior Member
 
Serbian_SS_Skinhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Vienna, born: Smederevo,Serbia
Posts: 15
Serbian_SS_Skinhead
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony Houseman View Post
Europeans have defended Europe in the name of Christianity but I think Christianity now serves no more purpose for Whites. Christianity has supported open borders, mass immigration and civil rights for non-Whites.
Unfortunatly every Religion got infiltrated by antifas and zionists.
There are many nationalist organisation who are christian.
But I see the last three Popes as enemys of the white race.
 
Old October 23rd, 2013 #15
Tony Houseman
Senior Member
 
Tony Houseman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: England
Posts: 1,082
Tony Houseman
Default

There are Western Churches that actively work against White interests.

I have respect for nationalists that are Christians. The problem is that Western Churches have been taken over by Cultural Marxists. This is especially true of the Church Of England. The Church Of England encourages mass immigration, fights the deportation of illegal immigrants, hasn't spoken out against the Islamification of Britain and Muslims sexually grooming British girls and says that people should feel sorry for and have sympathy for murderers, rapists and other criminal scum.

Things might be different with the Eastern Orthodox Churches as I know members of the Greek Orthodox Church have spoke up in favour of Golden Dawn. It's unlikely that any Western Church leader would speak in favour of GD or any organisation like it.
 
Old October 23rd, 2013 #16
littlefieldjohn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,020
littlefieldjohn
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony Houseman View Post
I have respect for nationalists that are Christians. The problem is that Western Churches have been taken over by Cultural Marxists. This is especially true of the Church Of England. The Church Of England encourages mass immigration, fights the deportation of illegal immigrants, hasn't spoken out against the Islamification of Britain and Muslims sexually grooming British girls and says that people should feel sorry for and have sympathy for murderers, rapists and other criminal scum.
And they support the Jew's false doctrine about no sexual difference that Jews feed to their goyim flocks & toss around the term 'homophobic' in their sermons. They dug their own grave.
 
Old October 23rd, 2013 #17
Petrinos Frouros
Junior Member
 
Petrinos Frouros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 149
Petrinos Frouros
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Serbian_SS_Skinhead View Post
I heard that the antychrist will build the Temple of Solomon again.

Will he hire construction workers or use his satanic powers to do it himself?
 
Old October 23rd, 2013 #18
Tony Houseman
Senior Member
 
Tony Houseman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: England
Posts: 1,082
Tony Houseman
Default

Christianity isn't Europe's native religion. Europeans had their own religions before being forced to convert to Christianity. Christianity has caused White people to kill each other for worshipping the same jew-based religion differently.
 
Old October 23rd, 2013 #19
Serbian_SS_Skinhead
Junior Member
 
Serbian_SS_Skinhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Vienna, born: Smederevo,Serbia
Posts: 15
Serbian_SS_Skinhead
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petrinos Frouros View Post

Will he hire construction workers or use his satanic powers to do it himself?
One of the most stuppid questions I ever read.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony Houseman View Post
Christianity isn't Europe's native religion. Europeans had their own religions before being forced to convert to Christianity. Christianity has caused White people to kill each other for worshipping the same jew-based religion differently.
Christianity also caused unity amongst white people aggainst islam.
Why was there no white unity before Christianity if only Christianity caused brother wars.
 
Old October 23rd, 2013 #20
Petrinos Frouros
Junior Member
 
Petrinos Frouros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 149
Petrinos Frouros
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Serbian_SS_Skinhead View Post
One of the most stuppid questions I ever read.
There are no stupid questions.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:26 PM.
Page generated in 0.15061 seconds.