Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old August 2nd, 2008 #1
Adi18
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Mazonnawar Citadel
Posts: 775
Thumbs up What is Americanism?

In my honest opinion, americanism is alot like AIDS, it's a disease of society. Europa, keep western values out!

Quote:
Der Stürmer, #23/1944.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


What is Americanism?

by Julius Streicher



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


When one speaks of America, millions of Germans think of their relatives who either recently or long ago left their German homeland to seek their fortune in the "New World." When someone succeeded in quickly making a lot of money in America, people said he had made his fortune. The result was that the "rich uncle" in America was envied, and his nephews and nieces were encouraged to join the fortune-seeker. Seeking fortunes in America led to Germany losing people, and the American continent received many people whose contributions are particularly clear in the agricultural and technical fields. That these people and their descendants now give great help to the enemies of Germany in this Second World War is a tragic fact.

The family ties between hundreds of thousands of German families and their American relatives led many to think that America would never join a second war against Germany. Now that that has happened, many Germans still believe that America will never allow Bolshevism to conquer and destroy Germany. Recent events have proven how false and dangerous this idea is. One has to be foolish or irredeemably stupid to believe that anything good can come to Europe from the land of presumed opportunity. That that did not happen after the First World War, and will not happen after the second. The Jews have made America what it is today: a nation raped by the Jews, a nation whose 130,000,000 people of many colors and races have been forced into helping the Jews achieve world domination! The descendants of European immigrants do not govern the United States of America today. The foreign and domestic policies of the country are made by the Jews and their lackeys. The American people wanted peace, but were maneuvered into war by Delano Roosevelt, a tool of World Jewry, who himself has Jewish blood in his veins. It was the same in World War I, when Woodrow Wilson, also a tool of the Jews, maneuvered it into the war.

Cordell Hull, one of the most prominent Jewish lackeys, controls the foreign policy of the United States of America. Hull is a particular favorite of the Jews. He was the one who stood alongside as Roosevelt lied to the American people and said that no American mother needed to fear that her son would fight in Europe. He and Roosevelt did everything they could to bring the United States into the Second World War. It is claimed that Cordell Hull is not a Jew. His appearance however leaves no doubt that Jewish blood is working its mischief in him and is producing that spirit that is typically Jewish. Perhaps it is this concealed Jewish blood that enabled him to overcome his horror when he married the baptized full Jewess Frances Witz. She is the daughter of the Jew Isaac Witz, who as is well known gained his wealth in ways that almost led him to prison or the electric chair. The New York Jewish newspaper "The American Hebrew" has this to say on 13 February 1942 about the Jewish spouse of the American Secretary of State Cordell Hull:

She is a tireless suporter of all efforts to help mankind.

It is an open secret that Jews do not work, but rather let others work for them. The "tireless work" of the wife of the American Secretary of State must therefore be a different kind of work than is done by working people. What is meant by saying that the Jewess Hull works untiringly in "all efforts to benefit mankind?" It is written in the Jewish law book, the Talmud, that only the Jew is human, that Gentiles are only animals. When the Jews speak of humanity, they mean only the totality of Jews. The Jewess Hull is therefore a "tireless worker" in the service of all the Jews. What her "efforts to benefit mankind" are has become clear through the protocols of the 1897 World Jewish Congress in Basel. It concluded that the Jews must work to destroy the national characteristics of other peoples through revolution, in order to make possible world domination by the Jews. In other words, the Jewess Hull is praised by "The American Hebrew" for being a tireless worker to establish world Jewish domination for the benefit of the Jews. The organized American air and ground pirates, who even call themselves murderers, are assisting in establishing this Jewish domination. The Jewish ties of the American Secretary of State are also evidenced by the fact that his sister married a Jew.

During Hull's term in office — he has served as Secretary of State since 4 March 1933 — the American State Department has been completely judified. The offices of the American State Department are filled with Jews both young and old. The diplomatic representatives of the United States of America to other nations are almost entirely Jews. For example, the ambassador in Paris from 1933 to 1936 was the Jew P. Strauss. The ambassador in Moscow after 1933 was the Jew Bullitt (after 1936 he was in Paris). The Jew Sack has been ambassador to Costa Rica since 1933, the Jew Schönfeld ambassador to Finland since 1937, the Jew Steinhardt (from 1939-1942 ambassador in Moscow) has been ambassador in Ankara since 1942. Cordell Hull's assistant secretary in the State Department is the Jew Pasvolsky.

World Jewry has made clear its thanks to the Jewish lackeys President Delano Roosevelt and his secretary of state Cordell Hull. Both Roosevelt and Hull received the highest honor World Jewry has to offer: "The American Hebrew Medal." It is the medal that World Jewry awards only for particularly valuable services. The president of the United States and his secretary of state were made honorary Hebrews. Cordell Hull received yet another honor from the Jewish weekly "The American Hebrew." It ran a long article in praise of the Jewish lackey Hull in its 13 February 1942 issue. He was praised as Roosevelt's "diplomatic chief of staff," as "one of the greatest statesmen of the world," one who had earned a place in the ranks of "immortal Americans." He was even called a "saint in serge." Never before has a Gentile, a "Goy" been praised, even deified, so unanimously by Jewry as this Jewish-related, Jewish-thinking, honorary Hebrew, the Jewish lackey Cordell Hull. This proves what Professor Werner Sombart wrote on page 43 of his book "The Jews and Economic Life":

One can rightly say that the United States owes what it is entirely to the Jews: that is, its American nature. What we call Americanism to a large degree is nothing other than the influence of the Jewish spirit.

"The influence of the Jewish spirit" today dominates the United States of North America. "The influence of the Jewish spirit" is what drove the American people into the disaster of the First World War, and forced them also in this Second World War to sacrifice enormous amounts of its blood. "The influence of the Jewish spirit" will destroy the New World, unless a Savior appears to rescue it from the abyss before which it stands.


Quote:
"Die Gefahr des Amerikanismus," Das Schwarze Korps, 14 March 1944, pp. 1-2.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The Danger of Americanism


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


When we speak of young Europe and its young nations, we contrast them to the senile world of dying liberalism which, under the leadership of Jewry, is once more gathering all its material resources in an attempt to forever subject the world to the power of money under the domination of those who have it. They want to perpetuate the social injustice they find so comfortable. More is involved than differences between ages and generations, however.

Our camp includes not only those who are young enough to topple the old and build a new world. It includes all those spiritual forces that see the new in the collapse of the old, who want to build a new future with new ways and means.

The triumph of the Copernican worldview over the unfruitful dogma of the past, the triumph of science over empty faith, was a victory of youth. They followed the shining examples of their predecessors. The youth have always been the battering ram that helped bring the national idea to fruition. The discovery of the laws of inheritance has been the occasion and guidepost of a new youth movement that builds on the eternal culture-building values of race and blood. They lead from the deadly and destructive lethargy of materialism to the new world of tomorrow.

Today it is as it always was in times of revolution. Those fighting for the new have more to offer the youth than those who live in yesterday, who hold to what they have grown accustomed to, even if it has long since become rigid, empty and stifling. We offer the youth the freedom to develop their nation, even in the case of smaller nations. We offer them room for creative fantasy, the opportunity to transform great thoughts to reality outside the lecture hall. We offer the realization of dreams on a world scale, a common Germanic will, a common European will. We fill the spiritual vacuum left by liberalism with the magic of a worldview that draws self-confidence and meaning to life from race and the blood of one's ancestors.

What does old England have to offer its youth to justify the war's requirements? It cannot even begin to solve its own social problems, much less offer anything to other peoples. Where is there a healthy youth that is on fire for Bolshevism? It was a danger only during the spiritual interregnum that followed the First World War. In the face of an inadequate yesterday, it was the only force, the only revolutionary movement, available, and anything was better than nothing.

Today Bolshevism may have reached its material and organizational pinnacle on the bent backs of its devotees, but as a spiritual movement it is finished. The crass incompetence of its methods and goals have proven it to be the very epitome of capitalist slavery.

The only remaining alternative is Americanism. As strange as it may sound, it is the only serious competition to National Socialism's racial worldview in the struggle for the youth, in the struggle for the future of humanity. In the end, however, it is only a forerunner of Bolshevism.

Americanism is certainly not a spiritual movement, nor is it a worldview that it is possible to oppose at the intellectual level. Its political beneficiaries have tried in recent years to give it, if not a face, at least a program or a goal: "the American Century." It is a collection of empty promises of the type democratic orators have always made — but this time on a world scale. There is nothing in them to excite a reasonable man. But that is exactly the point of Americanism! The key is not what it promises, but what it cannot promise. The key is not what it demands of men, but what gives them.

That would not matter if the world's youth were of the sound character that develops from racially conscious lines, tradition-rich families, good upbringing and close camaraderie. But that is not the way things are. The good fairy will not give youth the values they will need in life. The racially sound youth can be inspired by virtue of his blood. But the blood does not tell him what should inspire him. He can be misled into serving a bad cause. He can squander his enthusiasm if he matures in a spiritual vacuum. One should not underestimate the danger of Americanism, or its seductive power. It offers devotion to a culture of nothingness, independence, lack of restraint, a freedom from all obligation, from all honor, from all consideration.

We do not wish to deny this culture of nothingness its right to exist. It can even, rightly used, be good, just as it is sometimes a pleasure to do nothing. Should a German soldier happen to find a portable record player and jazz records in the deserted quarters of British or American soldiers, he does not smash them against the wall. Instead, he takes them along and thinks he has a great treasure. We don't want to suggest excessive cultural disaster here. There are times when he wants a vacation from himself, from us, from the whole world. He needs to relax, and certainly does not wish to ponder intellectual matters. Nothing is better suited to take him out of the normal world than the complete nonsense of this hot music, this cacophony of animal howls, wild instruments and foot-stomping Negro lust. It takes him away from human concerns back to the depths of pre-human apedom, returning him to the time when people did not need to think because there was no past and no future. Its effect is like that of alcohol, which turns normally rational men into shouting, destructive children. That can sometimes be good for serious and intelligent men. And the soldier certainly does not forget his German mission, nor does he lose his character or honor when he occasionally spends an hour relaxing to entertaining music. He is immune to the danger of confusing this rhythmic pig grunting with good music, much less art or culture. It cannot meet his higher standards.

Others, however, are not as immune. That is what those who deny any appeal of Americanism forget.

Certainly there is no danger that our young boys and girls will fall into sexual frenzy while listening to some Jewish lout blowing on a saxophone. One can introduce them to the high priests of the American jitterbug with no worries at all. At most they will laugh. Our young Luftwaffe aides and working girls would hardly join in a dance marathon. And the winning couple running through the arena in tattered, sweaty clothes would receive not applause, but a beating. But that is our youth. They are made of different stuff, and grew up in a world in which dignity comes from doing one's duty, and both are seen not as a burden but as the joy of life.

That may be self-evident to us, but it is not so to others. Whole nations behave in ways not guided by clear tasks. They are only individuals, parents, teachers, tribes and groups, able to lead them out of error and confusion into a clear world of meaning. We may not forget that during the tragic years following the First World War, a significant part of our youth too fell under the appeal of Americanism, waving their limbs in the Shimmy and the Charleston because there was nothing else to do.

We sometimes fail to see that there are young people in Europe today — often from the so-called better classes — who not only do not stand within the camp of young Europe, but even mock or scorn it. Many of us simply cannot understand how there can be a mass meeting at a Norwegian university protesting those who are risking their lives in the east for the freedom and security of their native land, or how Swedish students, even if they do not jump to the side of their Finnish brothers, do not at least follow their struggle with respect.

These young men surely are not consciously supporting the plans of Stalin and Roosevelt. Thank God, this small part of Europe's youth is not a politically aware counterpart to the European youth defending young Europe in the east. Those who think politically and act from conviction demonstrate it through their actions. The others have followed the comfortable path that leads from political thinking to Americanism.

That is the political danger of Americanism. It leads those who fall prey to it away from political thinking, away from responsibility, even to their nation, away from decency, even from national decency.

The American lad may use fine phrases to say that the nationalist is his political enemy. In reality, however, he fights a man who makes uncomfortable and difficult demands on him, the man who recognizes the fate of the nation as his fate, who respects the woman who will become the mother of his children, who wants to be a model, who always acts as if the eyes of the nation are upon him. The American lad feels his "freedom" restricted by such behavior. He wants to keep the hot music spinning on the record player, not be reminded that he must work as well as relax, that he must not only enjoy, but also honor the dignity of his nation.

That is neither comfortable nor pleasant. It is pleasant to talk slang and enjoy a loose moral life with those of like mind. Americanism has its delights, and he who is captivated by them not only sticks his head in the sand, he also gets some pleasure. It is nice to be able to dismiss all criticism of a too hearty enjoyment of life with the claim that one is defending human rights against Nazi brutality.

Americanism is not a logical development. It certainly does not spring from the descendants of the Virginia colonists with their Prussian sense of honor and duty, nor from the healthy farmers and citizens of the Midwest. It did not triumph easily against the often overdone moralism of Puritan circles. Its power grew along with that of Jewry. As is the case of everything that follows the orders of Jewry, Americanism's lack of culture and morality, its freedom-promising "Century of the Child," is nothing but a concealed way of ruining the youth.

Americanism is a splendid method of depoliticization. The Jews have used jazz and movies, magazines and smut, gangsterism and free love, and every perverse desire, to keep the American people so distracted that they pay no attention to their own fate. Even in politics, they are no longer influenced by the head, only by what is under the belt.

The Jews would not be Jews if they did not want to apply such tested methods to the entire world. Nearly every nation in the world faced or is facing the need to combat Americanism, a generally pleasant retreat to a barbaric lack of culture.

The logical consequences of Americanism will help the world combat it. The fact that 60% of American crimes are committed by children 13 years old and under and that rapes increased three-fold between 1942 and 1943 proves that Americanism has reached its limits. It will provoke a counter-movement that, just as in Europe, can only be political.

Americanism is not merely a moral-cultural form of degeneration, nor can it be combated by nonpolitical means. It has already been defeated when one digs it up by its roots and sees there plainly the words: "Made in Israel."


Quote:
Hans Otto Wesemann, "Verkitschte Massenseele. Kriegsinserate der Amerikaner," Das Reich, 13 August 1944, pp. 5-6.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The Kitschified Mass Soul:
American War Advertisements

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What a lot of noise the Americans make during this war. There are the major columnists and article writers, whose profusely long articles reach millions of paying customers, the radio announcers who drown their listeners on over two hundred stations, the war correspondents, not to mention such individuals as crazy Senators, generals, Amazons, and publicity-hungry baseball players. One cannot avoid them, nor does the public want to, since it saves them from thinking their own thoughts. But we do not want to talk here about Lipman [sic] and Dorothy Thompson, of Eleanor [Roosevelt] and Westbrook Pegler, but rather of those opinion-makers who reach the souls of the public through advertising.

Their glory is to have made the refrigerator into a North American cultural ideal. They have created a state in which people see the hand of God in a good income, and think the biggest symphony orchestra is also the best. They used the years of peace to get people to use Camel and Palmolive, to train them to drive Chevrolets and use Kelvinator refrigerators. They used America's freedom to lower everyone to the same level. Thanks to their untiring efforts, the nation's male hero is the successful businessman, the female hero is the laughing girl one sees everywhere from Florida to Washington, who uses the right make-up.

The war has had a big impact on American advertising. Formerly its job was not to bring national duty together with private business interests. That would have encouraged independent thinking, which would have disrupted the goal of uniform life styles. During the early years of the New Deal, the bureaucracy made an expensive attempt to sell its purchasing power theory by using attractive women in low cut bathing suits. It was a total failure. Once the armaments drive began, it was possible to return to the old and tested methods.

But today, advertising has a double goal. They are no longer able to satisfy the customers' wishes that they have aroused with every possible means of mass psychology. Now the job is to keep the consumers' wishes in their minds, or to keep them on ice. But the attempt is accompanied by traces of a bad conscience, insofar as paying heed to the national interest can be a matter of conscience. The national interest would require that all advertising be put in the service of duty, persuading people to buy as little as possible. People have far more dollars in their hands than there are goods to purchase. All the various regulations have not been able to abolish the liberal principles of the free market, which have driven prices sky high. The Senate and House of Representatives have refused Roosevelt's wish to narrow the gap between money in circulation and the goods available by raising taxes. The government thus has to rely on persuasion, for which it uses not only an army of journalists, but also advertising. The War Advertising Council attempts to preach reason by full-page ads. "We may not purchase a single item we do not need. We do not want to demand higher wages, or higher prices for the things we sell. We want to pay our taxes, regardless of how high they are. We will never pay a penny more than the official price. We want to save and live modestly." Some will find this attempt at autosuggestion a well done, but not particularly successful effort to plant economic rationality and national discipline in heads from which they have long since vanished.

But private advertising is even more interesting than official advertising, which has carefully determined themes and methods. During peace, American advertising experts had enough time to investigate every mass instinct, and to learn how to reach it. The results provide a remarkably good picture of the American character. American ads may be confusing in their multiplicity, but they depend on a few principles of mass persuasion. They rely on sex appeal, the pious misuse of Christianity, a gangster type of heroism, or simple kitsch, but they are as successful in war as they were before. Now they have an added element, a national paroxysm using every method of mass influence. That is evident in the otherwise familiar concert of American advertising. One cannot really say that the average American advertisement gives much effort to join in the nationalist tune. A bra ad that we include here, for example, surely attracts the eye, but does not lose anything because of the war. It contributes to the general ideal of beauty, makes the device attractive, and gives the reader the pleasure of a pun ("The lift that never lets you down"). It thus meets the normal expectations of a product of this type. But because of the war, even a bra can be used to defend American freedom: "Let no one rob you of your American freedom..." At the bottom, there is the usual phrase: "Buy more war bonds."

Most American ads do their duty in raising American war morale with this phrase. The firms using the phrase are usually those whose goods are not scarce. They have less to fear from the competition. America has plenty of room for whisky, suspenders, hair coloring products or pens. Things are different for the companies that have shifted to war production. They include the automobile industry, the photographic industry, the electrical industry, and other such areas. If they want to advertise to their publics today, they have to use entirely different methods. The earlier goal of advertising, fighting off the competition, makes no sense today. What good would it do General Motors to claim its cars were better than Ford's when neither is producing civilian vehicles? The big advertisers now have new found freedom. They use it to reach deep into the feelings of the average American.

The new creative freedom has had remarkable results. The Nash Company, which normally manufactures cars and cooling equipment, pays a lot of money to pay writers for short stories that demonstrate living Americanism. Formerly the talk was of streamlining and independent suspension. Now they talk of worship services in the jungle. We reproduce the ad here, since one seldom has the opportunity to see so concentrated a display of the American mentality. This combination of sentimental hero worship, religious prattle, kitschified family loyalty, and national vainglory is aimed at every possible emotion. It may be aimed at the emotions, but one has to grant that no real soldier would put such words on paper.

Everything that would show up in a war correspondent's report ends up in these ads, though in a different form. It is certainly true that an American soldier has sought to carry his wounded comrade away from the front line, or that another has made a brave attack with a flame-thrower. Certainly many have done their duty here and there. But when their deeds are reported in so kitschified a manner, it is intolerable. "Hear, America! Open your hearts, women and daughters! Open your wallets, fathers! Give your blood, brothers and sisters ... give your work. Then you will have the freedom, the country and the future you want when you come back home." And along with this supposed bombast of an American soldier we find business news: "Here at Nash Kelvinator we are building motors for naval aircraft, etc."

The American press has never been too fussy when it came to choosing its methods of reaching the instincts of the masses. The less of the spirit of the daring pioneers of the early years of American history remained, the easier life became through technological progress. The more the spiritual and psychic nature of the people reached a comfortable average, the greater was the longing for the extraordinary, for heroes of every sort. They took these heroes wherever they found them. The American public liked Capone as much as Lindbergh, Joe Louis as much as a Hollywood star who had been divorced five times. Crime has become a central part of the American media. It is hard to imagine an American magazine without a "photo crime," without a spouse murder, a child kidnapping, or a gangster attack. The attention paid to the most gruesome aspects of such cases would make no sense were there not a sadistic streak in the broad American public, which is shown by the reality of lynch justice as well as by pictures of every possible crime.

The best proof of the deep-rootedness of such instincts is proven by official propaganda, which claims to be superior to other advertising, but still is unable to dispense with the proper dose of horror. One of a series of ads for war bonds shows the shattered and half-decayed body of an American soldier on some battlefield. The caption reads: "No one expects that he will join in the Fifth War Bond Drive." The American bond drive is not going so poorly that the government was forced to use its heaviest guns. No, this type of approach is only explicable if one understands the mass psychology of the American public, which among other things proves to us that more than an ocean lies between that part of the world and Europe.

There is a picture of a pair of shorts with a patch. The caption says that during war, one should be sure one really needs something before buying it. Now, one can patch or darn or otherwise use a pair of shorts. These are perfectly reasonable suggestions. The viewer receives a simple argument about how such a pair of shorts looks. This pair of shorts is something of a modest sign in the midst of the bombastic flood of somewhat hysterical advertising to remind people that everything has two sides. Only a small minority is still able to think this way. That shows not only that there are a few individuals who have escaped the herd instinct of such frightening uniformity, but provides a counter-example to the sentiments that one writer expressed in one of the best examples of American advertising: "We are the greatest nation in the world. Our government is the best. We are the model of human religion, faith and morality. We are the best soldiers the world has ever seen. We are the smartest and freest nation, and the best developed socially." The old pair of shorts is easier to deal with than such a spirit: the shorts, at least, are still usable.


 
Old August 2nd, 2008 #2
Adi18
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Mazonnawar Citadel
Posts: 775
Default

"Die Wirklichkeit ist anders. Ernüchterte USA-Soldaten," Das Reich, 24 December 1944, p. 4.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Reality is Different:
Disillusioned USA Soldiers

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


It has been a year since a widely-read book in the United States complained that American soldiers had difficulty comprehending the seriousness of the war. With the exception of the elite Marines and colonial soldiers in the Pacific and flyers in Europe, the greater part of the American troops were then in barracks at home or in the expeditionary camps in England and North Africa. They spent their time fighting with each other. According to British opinion, they were hopelessly spoiled, and richly provided with the criminal elements of both skin colors. In the bloody battle at Casino and at the bridgehead at Anzio they began to gather bitter experience.

Since 5 June, the Americans are Eisenhower's main force on the western front, and have had to learn what it means to face an enemy with five years of experience in war, and that has a whole people willing to give its all. The Americans were disappointed to learn after the battle in France and the supply difficulties that followed that their enormous amount of supplies did not spare them long and bloody sacrifice. As a sergeant wrote from the western front to his home-town newspaper in distant Oklahoma: "Everything else fades into insignificance next to the dead and wounded. We soldiers here live more closely together than people back home in the States. Suddenly a comrade falls or is wounded. Or one hears that someone whom one has known for years is dead. Just yesterday you were talking about him. Today there was heavy fire. It was a long year."

Politicians and generals told the American soldier that the way back to Texas, Detroit, Washington and Chicago led through Paris and Berlin, but does he see that way? Eisenhower's declarations appeal to the lowest instincts of hatred to hammer into him the purpose of the war against the German people, but either he is a brutal murderer like his Bolshevist allies, or he understands only the half of it. A British war correspondent for the "Times," reporting from General Paton's Mosel front, praised the "battle-steeled Americans," but could not suppress this complaint: "These steel-helmeted imbeciles in their loose jackets must appear undisciplined to British officers and NCOs, since they imitate Churchill and smoke cigars while on duty. The French population is often astonished at their political ignorance and their inability to understand what the Nazis have done for Europe." Has the Englishman who wrote this forgotten the reports of his comrades, who found no evidence along the road from Normandy and Brittany to Paris and Brussels that the Germans had enslaved occupied Europe or starved it? The front soldier, whether American or not, is observant enough to doubt the word of the partisan fighters, who today terrorize their own countrymen. Or will the American soldier learn something about his political education and the democratic "Crusade against Fascism" when he seeks that the American occupation army has to defend with its bayonets the emigré governments it installed against the wrath of starving peoples, and against the vanguard of the Bolshevist dictatorship of the proletariat?

The American soldier had an unpleasant shock last summer when he heard not only from back home, but also from his own military leaders, that the enemy was on the run and that the war in Europe was as good as over. At that moment, the American soldier saw the chasm that separated him from the so-called war morale back home. The majority of them voted for Roosevelt because the president was their supreme commander and made fine demagogic promises about incorporating returning soldiers back into civilian life. But the soldier can also see the contradiction between these government promises and the unavoidable postwar crisis that causes panic for the American people back home.

The October issue of "Fortune" reported: "The American nation is concentrated on war production, and is not yet ready to absorb the victors of tomorrow back into the homeland." Veterans' legislation is incomplete and confusing. Above all, the necessary jobs are not available. With daily growing mistrust, American and British soldiers observe that their rapid return is not desired by their political and economic leaders. The occupation of Germany and the war against Japan provide ways to channel the masses of returning soldiers and postpone their demobilization into the future. The American Marine remains mobile. Plans for a standing army are being made.

The newspaper for the expeditionary troops, "Stars and Stripes," was careless enough to report a private poll taken in the USA, according to which 45% of those surveyed said that the individual soldier should not be released until he had a job. 31% were even opposed to giving returning front soldiers preference for jobs. The resulting storm of protest from soldiers at the front, who by law remain unnamed, demonstrated that American soldiers feel more threatened by such things than by any outward enemy. "Who are these people," one wrote, "who think that we like it over here? They probably don't have any husbands, fathers or brothers overseas. These are the people we are fighting and dying for? They are probably afraid they will lose their well-paid war jobs that they took from us."

Another letter writer: "You people back home want to tell us when we can come back home and take up a normal life. But most of us are only civilians in uniform who are fighting for the right to be civilians again. As civilians we are also businessmen who have not forgotten what stands in black and white in the contract: our old job is guaranteed us within six months of the end of hostilities. What happened to democracy?" A third soldier, one of a dozen no less energetic and striking, has this to say: "Just as it begins to look as if we will return home in the foreseeable future, these dogs back home are squabbling and yapping again. I am 100% in favor that each of them should have the same chance — here at the front."





Quote:
"Amerika als Zerrbild europäischer Lebensordnung," Schulungs-Unterlage Nr. 19 (Der Reichsorganisationsleitung der NSDAP., Hauptschulungsamt, 1942).



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


America as a Perversion of European Culture

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Why did the USA become a warmonger?

Franklin Delano Roosevelt took office as president in the midst of the worst crisis in the history of the United States. Although he was not responsible for the severe economic crisis he inherited from the Republicans in 1932, he did not have the strength to lead his nation out of its economic crisis. To the contrary. Once he saw that his plans, which went by the name "New Deal," were unfruitful, he decided that the best way out was to drive the Western European powers into a war against Germany. That would first enable him to overcome the economic crisis through war profits, and second to satisfy the stock exchange and armaments Jews.

His election promises forced him to introduce new economic policies to stimulate the economy. Driven by his Jewish advisers, he wasted countless billions in stimulating the economy, but could not end the crisis. Instead, the crisis in the United States intensified after 1936. Once again driven by his Jewish advisers, the only remaining way for Delano Roosevelt to deal with the economic situation was to become a world warmonger.

To prevent a domestic catastrophe, he created a world-wide catastrophe.

The publications of our Foreign Office prove that Delano Roosevelt incessantly incited England and other European states against Germany, hoping to drive them to war and thereby rescue himself.

He really seems to have believed that he could avoid direct involvement in the war.

The other nations were to fight for him, providing America with the economic prosperity he had promised, just as during and after the World War when the reparations payments flowed almost exclusively to America.

And the huge shipments of war supplies to the Western powers would mean big profits for American armaments magnates.

It is also clear that he was unscrupulously planning for the United States to replace England as the leader of the Anglo-Saxon community. Washington was to replace London as the economic center of the Anglo-Saxon world. Washington, already the capital of the United States as well as of the Jews and Free Masons, would become the capital of the world. He has a Messiah Complex, just as his predecessor Woodrow Wilson, in whose administration Roosevelt had served as Assistant Secretary of the Navy.

If his plans had worked out, he would have actually been the Messiah who fulfilled the millennia-old dreams of the Jews, that Ahasver people.

But the bombs at Pearl Harbor upset all the clever plans of this president of catastrophe in the White House.

Until then, no one believed that Japan would dare to go to war with the land of unlimited possibilities. After the German and Italian notes of 11.12.1941, in which both other members of the Three-Power Pact declared war on the USA, the USA for the first time found itself confronted with a two front war, which the American public had always feared. Roosevelt was no longer master of the situation — Pearl Harbor and German submarine warfare made him the prisoner of events.

2. America is no longer master of its economic forces

Roosevelt had been unable to deal with the internal crisis of the United States, even after nearly ten years in the White House. Now the crisis intensified. What the results for the USA will be cannot yet be foreseen. It is clear that the American people are at the end of a particularly fortunate era, during which they were able to live in luxury.

Roosevelt's first problem is to deal with the problems that are coming at him from every side. He had never been able to take the long view of things, but rather has always made his plans from one day to the next. That is not possible in a war. He is the worst sort of amateur. Politically clever, but otherwise weak party politicians of his sort have not been rare, but rather the rule. They all — Roosevelt included — had the luck to govern a land with vast natural resources that should have guaranteed prosperity for all Americans, if only these resources had been used for the common good, not given to a small number of Jewish financial magnates.

For example, the United States should never suffer a shortage of food. The problems developing since it entered the war result from Delano Roosevelt's chaotic policies.

Many of these problems would only result because of the complete failure of Roosevelt's unscrupulous government.

This man is sick in every regard. His infernal hatred against the Duce and the Führer is probably largely the result of his sickness. His boundless ambition is directly related to his difficulties. As the mass press in the United States regularly observes, the president has the firm conviction that he can deal with the world just as he has overcome his illness, through superhuman energy.

He assumed office at the same time as Hitler's seizure of power. From the first days of his presidency, he was overshadowed by the Führer. His New Deal, it is true, attempted to imitate numerous of the Führer's policies. But what led to success by us was condemned to failure in America, because Roosevelt is a man without particular gifts, and because of the particular conditions prevailing in America's model democracy. His plans were not designed for a particular people or race, but rather only for a population consisting of the most varied racial elements from throughout the world. His plans were condemned to failure, for he never had the ability to lead. The only chance was dictatorial measures.

The bizarre vanity of the man in the White House has been seriously wounded, which is why he hates the Führer and the Duce so much. He has the sick wish to destroy Europe's leading personalities.

3. The Jews alone drove President Delano Roosevelt into war.

Roosevelt's bosses while he was developing his war plans were Jews. They incessantly drove the President further along his twisted path. Bullitt, whose criminal actions as special ambassador and confident of the President are proven by the documents, began to spin his web in Warsaw and Paris. Bernard Baruch, once called a speculator by a Senate committee, gave the White House advice on foreign policy. Felix Frankfurter was appointed to the Supreme Court to see to it that Roosevelt's actions were not overturned by the highest court in the United States. Henry Morgenthau, a intimate of America's financial leadership, became Secretary of the Treasury. The New York judge Roseman wrote the president's speeches, which constantly grew more hateful. Secretary of State Hull, himself not a Jew but married to a Jewess, gave press conferences the material to arouse the rest of the world. Finally, the Freemason Roosevelt's clique of Washington Jews involved Poland, France and England in Washington's long-planned policies. The sick warmonger in Washington had reached his goal of unleashing a world-wide conflagration.

But things took a different course than Roosevelt had hoped. In Europe, one of his bastions after another fell, leaving England to fight for its very existence. Washington's arrogance toward Japan resulted in Pearl Harbor, and the notes of 11 December from Germany and Italy. Roosevelt suddenly found himself in a war that he had wanted others to wage, from which he had hoped to get the benefits.

I had repeated opportunities in the weeks after Pearl Harbor to see Roosevelt on the movie screen and hear him over the radio. He was no longer an arrogant president, but rather a broken man with a flat voice who was no longer master of the situation he had brought about. He could not understand what had happened. He had not wanted actual war, but had hoped to keep in the background. He wanted American destroyers to fire on German submarines, but without an open declaration of war. He wanted to slowly and comfortably build up his military, and only then attack us when necessary — perhaps in three to five years. His plans failed. He's probably regained his voice in the meanwhile. But despite his loud voice, his mills are grinding rather slowly. Germany can wait and see what will come from American war production.

Roosevelt's economic mismanagement in God's Country is clear from the problems the United States is currently facing. Since America's wealth means it has no problems with foreign reserves, one certainly would have expected that the warmonger Roosevelt would have stockpiled important raw materials that America lacks, such as rubber and tin. That was not the case. America imported crude rubber from Indonesia, supplies from which were cut off in a few weeks as a result of Japan's conquest. The American public was surprised to learn that its reserves were sufficient only to last to the end of this year. There was a lively discussion in the press, followed by an excited debate in Congress. That could not change the fact that the United States had neither significant rubber plantations in the New World, nor did it have any significant efforts to manufacture synthetic rubber.

And that is only part of the problem. The constant sinkings of American tankers along the East Coast led to fresh problems. The eastern states of the American union, with important industrial and commercial centers such as New York, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Bethlehem, Pittsburgh, Boston, Detroit, Toledo, and Chicago had been supplied with oil by tankers by sea routes from the south. Our submarines cut these routes. Tankers have been going down regularly for months. Few of us understand the effects our submarine warfare is having. In America, however, people understand clearly what the sinkings along the East Coast mean. It cuts the oil supply to the economically significant East, and creates grave transportation difficulties.

4. As a result of its rapid growth and its tendency to gigantomania, America has become a perversion of European culture.

Although any other country could accept the loss of private automobiles, the people of the United States cannot. It had become part of daily life. Every fourth American owns a car. The United States is a large country with widely separated cities. That alone made Americans dependent on the automobile. Particularly in the Middle West and the West, farmers are dependent on cars. Millions of trucks supply the big cities with food. Suddenly the United States faces a revolutionary change in its transportation system. The transportation problems are to be solved by greater dependence on the railroads, yet in recent years the number of locomotives and freight cars has sunk as the number of cars rose. Washington has announced that pipelines were being laid from Texas to the north, but even in America people openly say that such facilities will take at least a year and a half to complete.

The first thing to watch is how Americans who had a car for enjoyment will react to giving up the cars that they formerly did not think they could live without. We Germans can understand conditions in the United States only when we consider the particular mentality of the North Americans. Since they live on a rich continent, they believe they have particular privileges and deserve all of life's advantages. That makes giving things up hard for them, even things we Europeans view as luxuries that we can do without. Given their wealth, they made things as easy as possible for themselves. They were proud of their superiority to Europe in this regard, in contrast to their intellectual and cultural dependence on Europe. They did not understand how much they clung to superficialities. They spoke of a "tin can culture" in a way incomprehensible to us. American housewives can no longer survive without tin cans. They have become so lazy as a result of these tin cans that they can no longer cook like German housewives. When they came home in the evening after visiting the beauty parlor or working in an office, and before going to a cocktail party, they opened a can or two for their family's evening meal. Overnight, they have had to give up their tin cans because American tin reserves were shrinking. For we Germans that would be a trivial matter, but the Americans saw it as an intolerable imposition. They cannot understand how various other products of civilization have vanished from the American market, things such as electric refrigerators, washing machines and ovens, radios, gramophones and records, pots and other household items.

Americans who believed that they would never even know a war was going on now have to start thinking like Europeans. They will have to pay taxes like we do. We began by noting that Roosevelt's government had presided over a catastrophic economy. When he took office in 1933, his Republican predecessor had left a balanced budget. He immediately began to spend money. He promised that his New Deal would restore economic and social health. In fact, however, the New Deal threw billions of dollars out the window. Since he and his party were passing out money right and left, millions of voters had a personal interest in electing him a second and third time. But the national debt had risen by sixty billion dollars by the outbreak of the war.

This situation would undoubtedly had led to a revolt if Roosevelt had not unscrupulously been rescued by war. Without war, he would have been forced either to raise taxes or devalue the dollar. Either would have been a political disaster in peacetime that would have meant the end of Roosevelt and his clique. Once war came, Roosevelt could vastly increase his economic mistakes. He got approval for an additional $65 billion for military purposes. And he has already said that he would need "at least" another $225 billion for the war. Just as he did at the beginning of his presidency, he is constantly talking about the vast measures that these enormous sums will pay for. Formerly he spoke of job creation programs or work camps for the youth. Now he talks of huge numbers of airplanes, tanks, guns and ships. But those familiar with his methods know that he has always talked big, but has not produced results. We Germans can therefore wait and see what deeds will follow his words. The economic mismanagement in the United States, which is simply beyond our understanding, will cause even greater problems. Now that the American people are at war, Roosevelt believes he can take the risk of raising the income tax to a level of 35% to 40% for the middle class. We will see if he can do this without causing inflation. A German reader can only understand what this means when he realizes that a married American currently owes practically no income tax at all if his monthly income is equivalent to about six hundred marks. The new taxes will overnight reduce the American standard of living to a point that one will no longer be able to speak of American prosperity.

5. The war is not a matter of the people.

The natural result is that the war is not as popular as the American government would like it to be. Pearl Harbor was greeted in the United States with remarkable indifference. In the weeks and months thereafter, the American press, that naturally follows Washington's instructions, tried to build enthusiasm for the war through every possible method. But the average American could not understand that he was in a war that was a matter of life and death. The press and government try daily to fight popular attitudes. Although they do not understand what they are supposed to be fighting for, it is gradually dawning on them that they face years of sacrifice, and that the United States will never again be a land of luxury.

The fact that their army is a mirror of the nation also gives them cause to doubt. Roosevelt succeeded in building an army of several million soldiers. But even in May their weapons were ludicrous. As much as possible, all weapons and supplies had been sent to England. The American military leadership and a significant part of the American press protested. With unbelievable stubbornness, however, Roosevelt continued these shipments even during the spring, even to the Bolshevists. American maneuvers were therefore carried out with completely inadequate equipment. Most soldiers had no weapons. Tanks and artillery were completely lacking. The uniforms were in poor shape. American newspapers regularly reported that soldiers mocked their generals. There were many deserters. Venereal diseases spread.

The draft followed a strange system. One class was in the 20-39 age range, the other 40-64. Formerly, only those were drafted who passed a medical examination. Since the examination could be done by a family doctor, however, many young Americans with prosperous parents simply bought their way out of military service by paying the doctor a sufficiently high fee or by bribing officials. As a result, the American army does not make a good impression.

Since the overwhelming majority of the American population did not want to join the war, young Americans always asked me nervously before Pearl Harbor if I thought that the United States would end up at war. They clearly were afraid that they might have to put on their country's uniform. Even while I was interned, many American officials told me, the enemy, that they simply could not understand why they were fighting. Federal officials gave me the special editions of the New York newspapers that carried the notes from the Italian and German governments of 11 December. They stammered that they still hoped that the United States could still remain neutral. That is how naive the Americans are. They are like children playing with fire, who do not think they might be burned. Their complete political immaturity is the only explanation as to why a sick man was elected president for the third time, even though there was no doubt as to the dangers of his policies.

6. The president believes he can win.

Since he is sick, he is guided by wishful thinking. He naturally does not think the Axis powers will win. He does not have the least idea that if we lose, communism will take over all of Europe. Leading American newspapers openly say that the United States does not care if red flags fly over Berlin, Rome, Budapest, Bucharest, Paris, and Madrid. Since Roosevelt thinks that he can come to terms with Bolshevism, he believes they will accept Anglo-Saxon control of the seas, and that they will accept Washington as the capital rather than London. He has fantasies of policing the world's oceans. He has gathered the "United Nations" under his leadership, which includes not only the important enemy states such as the USA, England, the Soviet Union, and China, along with the Latin American states that declared wear on us by Washington's orders. It also includes the exile governments of nations like Holland, Belgium, Luxembourg, Yugoslavia, and Poland that no longer exist. With unbelievable vanity, Roosevelt considers himself the head of this peculiar union which he sees as the way to realize his dreams of world domination.

7. The tonnage problem is the challenge for England and the USA.

Roosevelt's problem is that events have not gone as he had naively hoped. That brings us back to submarine warfare, which from the first days of the war gave Washington serious headaches. For more than two years, the Battle of the Atlantic has been seen by the American press as at least as important as the land war. The shipping problem is a major concern for Washington, especially since Roosevelt wants the United States to be the "arsenal of democracy." Even if Roosevelt manages the impossible task of manufacturing the war materials his allies need, he still faces the problem of getting the material to England and the Eastern Front. American experts are still telling the American press that there is no immediate possibility of replacing the ships that are continually being sunk by our submarines. Roosevelt talks of the tonnage to be built by American shipyards. The experts know, however, that the capacity is lacking. Roosevelt talks of building new shipyards, but the experts in the USA have no doubt that a long time will pass before Roosevelt's plans can be realized. The highest figures named are two and a half million tons a year. Those who are familiar with American exaggeration, however, know that the final figures will probably be much lower. The same is true of the other production statistics from Washington. According to all the evidence, the American war effort is in its earliest stages. German readers must realize that in a democracy, there are many difficulties involved in moving the economy from peace to war. American war production will begin to be at full strength only by the end of next year. In the meanwhile, transportation will be more of a problem for the United States than production.

But Roosevelt has plans even if the Axis wins. He thinks he will win the war regardless of what happens. If England loses, then Canada and all the other European possessions in the Western Hemisphere will fall into his hands. He also hopes that dollar imperialism will conquer South America. Washington's current plans are to bring everything between the Rio Grande and the Panama Canal under its control, and to make South America economically dependent on the United States. Roosevelt's plans in the event of an Axis victory make clear to the reader the coldness with which he made his plans over the years, aided by his hypocritical speeches written by the Jewish federal judge Roseman.

Who knows what fate has in store for him? Many indications are that the war will end in terrible catastrophe for the United States. Perhaps this false Messiah, the lackey of his Jewish allies, will be brought to justice by his own people. History, after all, is just.


Quote:
"Europe und Amerika. Fehlerquellen im Aufbau des amerikanischen Volkstums," Schulungs-Unterlage Nr. 18 (Der Reichsorganisationsleitung der NSDAP., Hauptschulungsamt, 1942).



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Europe and America:
Failures in Building an American People

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Main Points:

The USA has no ethnic unity.
Every attempt to built an American people has failed.
Instead of an American people, there is an American class.
Jewry is a primary reason for the absence of an American people.
There is also a noticeable absence of a moral and national ideal.
The development of a unified people is also hindered by streams of asocial elements from around the world.
There is therefore no unified people in the USA, only a population.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. The USA has no ethnic unity.

When speaking of the German people, we are dealing with a fixed group of people who are defined by their nature and territory. There is usually a "natural" relationship between between a people and its territory, such that naming the people brings to mind a territorial area. On this particular section of the world with its climate, its beauties, and its nature the people's history took place. Here its inhabitants found the source of their strength. Here its cultural landmarks give evidence of its spirit. Here its myths and fables have their roots in the distant past.

Such a relationship between people and space does not exist in the USA. They have no myths and fables, only facts. They jumped right into the middle of history — the only instance in world history in which the development of a governmental system and a "people" could be observed by historians from the very beginning.

The history of this governmental system begins with English colonial history. Long before, however, other Europeans had come in contact with the American continent. Vikings from Greenland reached North America as early as 1000. The second visit also came from the Germanic north, as the two Germans Pining and Pothorst landed in Newfoundland in service of Denmark. These were only brief episodes, however. Only with Columbus did America enter the consciousness of Europe. Columbus is also the reason why Spain was for a while the leading European power in the new world, although as early as 1497 the English under Cabot arrived and occupied Labrador and Newfoundland. They had to share the latter with France at first. The development of North America, once Spain turned more to Central and South America, was determined by the struggle between England and France. English seafarers had occupied a section of the East Coast by the end of the 16th Century. With the help of commercial organizations, the land was settled and developed. A modern English colony of mercantile nature developed.

That changed as the first Puritans, the so-called Pilgrims, arrived in 1620. From the beginning, the goal of their settlement in the New World was to free themselves from the English Motherland, which they had left because of their sectarian beliefs. They could not free themselves, however, from their racial nature, their genuinely English outlook and attitudes that influenced every area of their lives. That gave the settlements their distinctive characteristics. It also could not stop Germans from settling on the North American East Coast, particularly in Pennsylvania, which had been settled by the leader of the patient Quakers, William Penn. They were more tolerant of religious differences than the Puritans. Pennsylvania was the first settlement that was not settled exclusively by the English.

Developments in the next decades were influenced by the conflict between England and France. France had claimed the entire Mississippi River basin in 1700. That included English settlements both in the north and south. After a long and bitter struggle that mirrored the conflict in Europe, England succeeded in ousting the newcomers. The real issue was settled by the Peace of Hubertusberg, which ended the Seven Year War. France was forced to cede Canada and all the land east of the Mississippi to Great Britain.

After the British eliminated the Dutch, who had colonized Manhattan Island and New Amsterdam, later New York, England was the dominant power on the North American continent. However, a new difficulty soon arouse, one from within. London had overlooked the fact that the colonies had changed from mercantile outposts to agrarian colonies. The land was controlled not by foreign plantation owners, but by local settlers. England believed that it could continue to treat them as mercantile outposts, which resulted in resistance from the colonialists. In the War of Independence (1776 to 1783), "the States" won their freedom.

After the War of Independence, developments took an entirely different course: The original English colony became a European colony. This change provided the basis for the establishment of a more or less racially unified population with a connection to territory. German immigrants above all sought to adjust to the new land. The other requirement, a population united by common blood, was also present. This situation changed fundamentally as a result of continuing immigration, however. There were three general periods of immigration, each with its own characteristics corresponding to the nature of the stream of immigrants.

In the first periods, which ended with the War of Independence, the Anglo-Saxon element predominated, though there were already around 250,000 Germans in America.

The second period included the 19th Century. It began with immigrants predominately from Northern Europe, including Germans, English, Irish and Scandinavians. In the third period, on the other hand, from about the turn of the century, the majority came from the Southern and Slavic nations. There were many Eastern Jews. By 1930, the ethnic background of the North American union was as follows:


English 41.4%
Germans 17.2%
Irish 11.2%
Scandinavians 4.3%
Italians 3.6%
Poles 4.1%
Dutch 2.0%
Russians 1.8%


(These figures include the Jews in the respective countries.) Ethnically, the USA had become a mirror of Europe, a kind of "United States of Europe" on American soil.

2. Every attempt to built an American people has failed.

Throughout the entire 19th century, North America exerted a powerful attraction on the people of densely populated Europe. People recognized what the technical means developed in crowded Europe would be able to do in an area that did not suffer from the territorial limitations of Europe. Applying the methods of a developed continent to an undeveloped one made North America into a land of unlimited possibilities. That attracted immigrants. Between 1820 and 1920, no less than 33.3 million people settled in the USA. They came from every nation of the old world. By 1900, the USA was a colorful mixture of nations.

As long as the primarily source of immigration was Northern Europe, there was really no racial problem. The various ethnic groups were close enough so that intermarriage had no negative effects. A unified people developed over the decades and centuries. That changed during the 1880's. The immigrants from the north declined, and were replaced by other groups. Between 1900 and 1910, only 23.3% of the newcomers came from Germanic areas, while 76.7% came from Southern Europe or the Slavic nations. Things were even less favorable in the following decade. The new immigrants had other customs, other languages, other ways of thinking, other religions, other skills. The nationality issue suddenly became a problem. Even the most superficial observer had to see the danger of a racial mosaic within the nation's boundaries. Many occupations were practically monopolized by individual nationalities. In the housing industry by 1910, for example, the Irish did the excavation, the Germans the rough construction, the Italians the interior work, native Americans the plumbing and the Jews the painting. The most basic areas demonstrated the disunity of the USA. The problem of Americanization was clear.

Its seriousness at first was not recognized. People assumed that the environment would encourage unity and settled for economic equality. A Jew even thought he could prove that physical appearances were merging. Immigrants had to adapt to the environment — at least outwardly — to avoid unnecessary difficulties. People hoped that with time the new immigrants would become genuine Yankees. Such naive thinking was possible only because no one had thought about the idea of a people in general or an American people in specific. An American was someone who lived in the USA, earned a lot of money, and more or less spoke English.

Some began to look deeper. Economic leaders like Ford saw the frictions resulting from various ethnic groups as a problem in production and began to consider the problem seriously.

The process of becoming a people includes matters of culture, language, customs, history and faith. There could be no immediate common history for people coming from the most varied nations, people who consciously or unconsciously still carried the marks of their homeland. The touchy matter of religion was also not easily dealt with. It was the matter that first made the problem clear to the American Babbit. Secret societies like the Ku Klux Klan were a way of resisting or actively opposing the growing influence of Catholicism. That left two ways to Americanize the immigrants: customs and language.

Even before the World War, efforts were made to teach the "aliens" the language and ways of thinking of the country. Courses in Americanism included not only the language and government, but also attempted to build American national pride. This resulted in the desire for records and gigantomania that always amuses us. Lacking a significant political and intellectual history, the American is forced to build his national pride on technology.

Customs were another leading factor. The immigrants sought to adapt to them as rapidly as possible to avoid standing out. The growing standardization of life reached such an extent in the USA that independence became impossible. Everyone wears the same clothes, and thinking like everyone else is a duty. In contrast to Europe's variety, this seems odd to us, but we should not forget that uniformity is about the only way Americans can experience community. This process of Americanization was successful, but also superficial. A type developed, but not a people.

It is significant that a Jew was the first to recognize the inadequacy of Americanization. Israel Zangwill published a play titled "The Melting Pot" in 1909. This gave the USA the metaphor for its future: a melting pot of every nationality and race that would form a new unified people. His call for an indiscriminate and homogenized mixture found its theoretical justification in the Declaration of Independence, which spoke of the equality of all people. It agreed not only with Zangwill's view of the inadequacy of previous assimilation policies, but also for the secret wish of the Jews for a nationality soup without instinct that would not stand in the way of its path to world domination.

The population, however, did put one limitation on the melting pot thesis. Mixing with Blacks was out of the question. Even today 30 states have strict laws against intermarriage with Negroes. (Naturally, that has nothing to do with illegitimate relations between Blacks and Whites; the estimates are that 20,000 mixed-race children are born annually.) The Negro problem, indeed the racial problem in general, is viewed differently in the industrialized North than in the more agricultural South, which had drawn a sharp line for centuries between the Colored and Whites. The limited penetration of the Jews in the South can also be noted. The Jew has an interest in eliminating racial boundaries and therefore always makes common cause with the Blacks. (The Jewish element in Roosevelt's ancestry or the White House's dependence on the Jews may be responsible for his attitude toward the Negro question. The president's wife in particular takes pleasure in ignoring all racial boundaries. Political calculations also play a role — there are around 12 million Negroes in the USA. They have an important influence in elections. Despite all efforts by Roosevelt and his Jewish men behind the scenes, the melting pot theory does have its limits. This is one of the biggest problems in the domestic developments of the union. Time will tell if the growing demands for emancipation by the Black element, which in some Southern states comprises over half of the population, will succeed. That might eventually lead to a dissolution of an American state.)

The World War was a turning point in the Americanization process. Blood proved stronger than the environment. There is no point in wondering if Zangwill's theory would have had greater success without the World War. It is not possible to determine the impact on the northern states and on the lower social class of immigrants who today are the primary source of relationships between Blacks and Whites.

Even before the World War, a certain re-nationalization of the masses was noticeable, which could even be decisive in presidential elections. The World War encouraged such developments. For example, the Germans were strong enough so that Wilson was forced to speak against entering the war. Other "hyphenated Americans," above all the Irish, also held to their ancestry, showing the weakness of the melting pot.

3. Instead of an American people, there is an American class.

In view of the failure of Americanization and the renationalization efforts of various ethnic groups, the Anglo-Saxon element attempted to secure its unofficial leading position and to affirm its dominance in public life. The English element, above all in the East, had always had a special position, supported by the fact that immigrants from the United Kingdom had learned national characteristics and pride in the homeland. This was not characteristic of the German immigrants, who saw themselves as Hessians or Westphalians, etc. Both their number and confidence enabled the Anglo-Saxons to impose their norms on the others. English life was the model for American society. The customs and religious nature of the Puritans and Quakers also continued to bind the old colonies to the former Motherland. Some rightly spoke of the Americans as covert Englishmen.

The new attitude received a jolt in the Immigration Law of 1921, which greatly restricted undesired immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe.

The law stopped the flow of elements that were difficult to assimilate, but is made no fundamental change. The issue was not settled; a leading class in the racial mosaic had formed. It claimed social and political leadership. It was a minority among the other nationalities that was unwilling and unable to assimilate the other racially foreign elements. Unfortunately, this Anglicizing of public life went hand and hand with a suppression or elimination of the German influence, which alone could have had an ennobling and beneficial impact on the class.

4. Jewry is a primary reason for the absence of an American people.

Jewry's domination is a major reason for the failure to develop a unified people that organically would include everyone from the leadership to the most basic economic activities. No country has more Jews than does the United States. That was not always the case. During the colonial period, they were rare. When one surfaced, he was a representative of some company. They were not found among the real pioneers. Only after the land was settled and industrialization offered new ways to earn profits did the immigration of Jews begin, above all from Eastern Europe. 90,000 Jews came to the USA annually between 1899 and 1914. Today there are around eight million Jews in the States, a quarter of whom live in New York. With some justice, it has been called Jew York. Their influence is out of all proportion to their numbers. The current president is their willing tool. He ignores Benjamin Franklin's political testament, a member of the Constitutional Convention of 1787, who warned: "Wherever Jews have settled in large numbers, they have had a harmful effect on morality and integrity. They stay separate and are not assimilated. They form a state within the state, and seek to destroy a nation financially if people oppose them. This was the case with Spain and Portugal. If you do not exclude them from the United States, in less than 200 years they will be here in such numbers as to rule the land and change the form of government for which we Americans have shed our blood, sacrificed our lives and property and risked our freedom. If you do not exclude them, in less than 200 years our posterity will work in the fields to feed them, while they sit in their offices. I warn you, gentlemen: if you do not exclude the Jews, your children will curse your graves. Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatic, wherever they are born and however many generations removed they may be. They will never change." [This statement, by the way, is a widely quoted by anti-Semites, but it is a fake citation.]

The USA's leaders ignored these words and gave their nation to the Jews. The arrival of the Jews was eased by two influential organizations: Freemasonry and the church. The help Protestantism gives to Jewry is evident in the frequency with which Protestant ministers preach in synagogues and rabbis stand behind Protestant pulpits.

What significance does Jewry have in the process of nation building? As we have seen, the Jews are the most ardent defenders of the idea of the melting pot. Unlike other proponents of Americanization, they do not even draw a "color line" between Blacks and Whites. Thus New York's Jewish governor Lehmann signed a law in summer 1939 that abolished all differences between races, colors, and religions. The Jews have no interest in developing a nation with solid racial substance, such as was present in those coming from Northern Europe. To the contrary, they oppose every effort toward national affirmation and work toward a racial stew — except for themselves! Domination by the Jews and national distinctiveness are opposites that cannot be brought together even in the Land of Unlimited Opportunity.

The end result in the USA will not be the development of an American people, but rather the domination of the Jews. The Anglo-Saxon upper class serves them, and leads the American "people" in a way that serves Jewish hopes for world domination.

5. There is also a noticeable absence of a moral and national ideal.

The first English immigrants who left their stamp on political and intellectual life in the East were the Puritans. One must know the Puritans to understand the Americans. One of the most important aspects of this unusual faith is that it draws its entire intellectual strength from the Old Testament, forming its life by it and evaluating the world from its perspective. Persecuted because of their beliefs, the Puritans denied others the intellectual and religious freedom they had claimed for themselves. They went after adherents of all other beliefs, imprisoning, torturing and hanging them. (Later toleration was the result of German influence). This Old Testament fanaticism which extends to moral sadism is even today a foundation of Americans. It is the basis of their rejection of everything foreign and their superiority complex, as well as their claim to be able to judge the world. A Christian sect that was influenced by the Jewish spirit thus prepared the way for Judah's later takeover of the USA.

A further characteristic of Puritanism — the result of the Hebraic influence from the Old Testament — was its materialistic emphasis. This originally had a religious emphasis, but later was transformed into materialism. Money-make [sic] is the American public's ideal. It is the single American contribution to its own culture, which is otherwise entirely a European import.

Common ideals are necessary for a people. Great power dwells therein. Roosevelt knows this, and therefore tries to give his nation some kind of ideals. He tries to replace missing national ideals with a common ideology of "fighting Fascism and aggression." This will have as little success in building a people as the idea of money-making. Money-making today is the idol, anti-Fascism the ideology of Americans, but neither is an ideal sufficient to build a people upon.

6. The development of a unified people is also hindered by streams of asocial elements from around the world.

The ideal of eternal success is a grave danger to a people's morality. The result is that in the USA, people are valued only according to their success, ignoring all other measures. Such a view of life inevitably must attract materialistically-oriented people. The USA was their place. Alongside Nordic farmers desiring land, adventurers and gold-diggers of all sorts came to the United States. Even worse, the unfit elements who were outside the social or legal order were drawn to the New World. There only what one did counted, regardless of whether or not it was consistent with morality. It is certainly true that some dubious elements found useful work in the fresh air of the new nation, but others who had demonstrated their moral weakness back home brought their antisocial or criminal nature along to poison the US-American population. For example, during the 1860's criminals condemned to death for murder in Germany could be pardoned if they emigrated to America. Such blood elements could not contribute to building a nation. They could only hinder the development of a community that put the good of the whole above the good of the individual, and that demanded one serve the community even at the risk of one's life. This is yet another reason for the failure of the USA to develop a people. The political and criminal gangsters that are so evident today cannot be understood without seeing not only the national origins of immigrants, but also their social value. It is certainly true that the most valuable and active elements from overpopulated and cramped Europe went abroad, but also some asocial and less gifted ones. The reply that signs of decay in the USA are the result of European influences is actually the fault of the Americans themselves, since their indifference to firm moral standards drew such elements to their country.

7. There is therefore no unified people in the USA, only a population.

Despite all the efforts, the various elements of the USA have not been able to form a unified people. The attempt failed first because of the superficiality of an attempt that ignored racial and historical differences and was satisfied with external assimilation, and second because it met the clear and determined opposition of some circles that resisted active or passive assimilation. The most active groups included the Anglo-Saxons, who rejected connections to groups they viewed as inferior, and the adherents of certain religious groups who saw giving up their national characteristics as a threat to their religious survival. The problem of Americanization, for example, does not exist for the Amish-Mennonites, who for religious reasons stand outside the larger society.

Such behavior may be viewed as narrow-minded from the American standpoint, but still has significant impact on intellectual, economic and political life in the USA. One cannot ignore the fact that the source of strength — and the Union has had considerable strength — lies in the countryside and small towns where immigrants have held to their ethnic characteristics and languages longer than in the big cities. There the individual is needed racially, not merely physically. The melting pot theory found its greatest acceptance in big cities. We clearly see there the blatant perversions of American life that result from racial mixing. To judge the USA by that, however would be as false as if one had judged Germany during the Weimar period by what was happening in Berlin.

A guided process of nation-building through indiscriminate mixing — a contradiction in terms — is impossible, as is a legal separation of the various racial and ethnic groups living in North America, apparently the goal of the Blacks. The only remaining possibility is to let the various groups live as they wish, hoping that over time a common American culture will develop. Like Wilson before him, Roosevelt is trying to establish unity through a common ideology. He has succeeded in leading his nation to war. However, his ideology today is the ideology of the past, which is attempting to maintain the interests of the past. That is too weak a foundation on which to build a nation. Time will tell if it is also too weak a foundation on which to wage war. The USA as yet has not experienced a modern war that demands its full resources. Its participation in the World War was limited to a few months of battle against an enemy that had already been bled dry. Its political contributions at the end of the war at Versailles, its failure to ratify that treaty, and its refusal to join the League of Nations shows the unreliability and questionableness of policies based on ideology, not true national foundations. During a war, only a people can fight for its future, not a mere population that is racially, religiously, linguistically, ideologically and governmentally disunified. Given all that has been said, the USA has no unified people, only a population.


Quote:
Robert Ley, Roosevelt verrät Amerika! (Berlin: Verlag der Deutschen Arbeitsfront, 1942).



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Roosevelt Betrays America!

by Dr. Robert Ley



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


We stand at the threshold of a new era. An old world is used up and exhausted, a new one is knocking strongly and insistently at the doorway of the world. The young peoples, called the have-nots by the old sinking capitalist world, are demanding their right to recognition and equality. The aging world of money and democracy does not want to make room. The honorable Lord Halifax said it plainly: They want to live on in the gluttony and luxury to which they have become accustomed. Their standpoint was: "Money rules the world, and the have-nots will have to accept that fact."

They sought the war, they provoked and maneuvered to get it. They pressed the young peoples of Germany, Italy and Japan wherever they could. They wanted war, a real world war — and now they have it.

Not only two worlds of ideas are at war here, but the whole world. This war reaches every corner of the world. The plutocrats are on the line; they have to defend themselves. The Jews and their hired lackeys, Churchill and Roosevelt, must themselves step into action. The field is cleared, and now we face our real enemy, the men behind the scenes who over the decades plunged the world into disorder, war, and revolution, but whose own valuable capitalist lives were naturally too valuable to sacrifice in war.

But finally we have forced them into the open, and we have sworn that we well not let go of them until their murderous handiwork is laid bare. This is a hard war, a matter of being or not being, of life or death, either or. We therefore must understand the strengths and capacities of our main enemy, to weigh and evaluate them insofar as it is possible within this brief pamphlet. We will consider the grounds that moved Mr. Roosevelt to drive his people into war. Aside from his deep hatred against us Germans in general and National Socialism in particular, there naturally are domestic causes and imperialist intentions that led the warmongering clique in New York to chase after war until they finally caught it.

Let us begin.

I. The racial confusion in the USA.

We National Socialists know that every action is in some way racially determined. There is no doubt that on the one side of this struggle stand absolutely unified peoples and nations, while on the other side there are various nationalities led by the Jews, the prototype of racial decay. Germany, Italy, and Japan are unified nations, whose national unity is based on blood. The other side has only unions: the union of the states of North America, the Union of Soviet Republics and the Union Jack, the union of the English empire.

The United States was settled by nearly all the races of the earth, of which the European contingent was the largest. The common English language does not say much, for the English language won over German by only a single vote majority. Just as we could not have spoken of the North Americans as Germans had that happened, neither can we today speak of Anglo-Saxons or English. The Jew would have us believe that a new race develops when other races are mixed. He even gives it a romantic-sounding name: "the melting pot of the races." That is, however, biologic nonsense. Such a bastardization process does not lead to a new and valuable race, but rather a corrupt racial mixture in which the bad characteristics come to the fore, and in which finally parasitic manifestations appear, such as we see in American insanity and in the ruthless business style of the ruling class in North America.

The USA became the home of the gangsters, the insanities of Hollywood, the stock dealers of New York, the orators of Washington: in brief, the land of truly unlimited possibilities, namely those of insanity and criminality, produced by its racial mixing.

II. The World View Foundations

The USA once conducted a war of independence against the British Crown. The Declaration of Independence of those freedom fighters even today is thought to be the beginning of North American freedom and independence, celebrated annually. But one today hears voices on both sides of the ocean about reuniting the Anglo-Saxon world. Churchill even makes the idea the center of this Christmas message in Washington. The sly old fox is quite right. The USA has decayed into the English world of Puritanism and Calvinism. The hypocritical lying capitalist world of Manchester and Oliver Cromwell is today the world of Roosevelt, Morgenthau, Knox, Stimson, and their consorts. One can even say that the Jew rules more fully, ruthlessly and completely in New York than in London. Remember the oft-cited quotation from Calvin that the masses of workers and craftsmen must be kept poor so that they will be obedient to God, and will work only when they are driven to it by necessity. This is a central theme of the capitalist economy, resulting in the theory of the "productivity" of lower wages. The misuse of the concept of God runs like a red thread through English history. God was always the ground for any crooked dealing. The notion of the Old Testament's chosen people fits in here as well. This clearly proves the similarity in English and Jewish thinking. We find such nonsense repeatedly by the leading English circles over the centuries.

The original claims of chosenness, of God-willed wealth and God-ordained poverty, of dark secrets and mystic superstitions was begun by Oliver Cromwell and became the foundation of the English Empire. On can read the following about the English saint in Volume II of Wilbur Contez Abbot's "Writing and Speeches of Oliver Cromwell": "They could hardly say anything to Cromwell without him putting his hand to his heart, raising his eyes to the heavens and calling God as his witness. He will weep and lament and moan, all the while sticking the knife in your ribs."

Does that not remind one of our contemporaries Churchill and Roosevelt when they together sang "Onward Christian Solders" on the since-sunken "Price of Wales"? Or when they sing in a Methodist church in Washington. They are Cromwell's pious, hypocritical successors.

Oliver Cromwell always called on God n the midst of his atrocities, his bloodthirsty orgies against the Irish and the Scottish, and viewed his devilish soldiers as the chosen people of God. Churchill and Roosevelt have learned the methods of the bestial hypocrite Cromwell by heart, and have proven that nothing, absolutely nothing has changed in the English-American world over the past three hundred years. That is the lying capitalist world that calls God as its witness to every shameful act and enslaves and exploits humanity in its dreadful superiority. Its father was Calvin, its sword Oliver Cromwell and its benefactors and successors are Churchill and Roosevelt. They are so proud and self-confident that they call the USA God's Own Country. As the Jews use Jehovah, they use the Lord God!

III. The Actual Nature and Real Strength of the USA.

The Jew in the USA. The original citizens of the USA were anti-Semites, and the emancipation of the Jews in America took a long time. But just as a young and growing organism is more easily infected by parasites and bacteria than a more mature and stronger one, so too the North American national body was overwhelmed by Jews from everywhere in the world. According to American statistics, over 5 million Jews lived in the USA in 1926. They were concentrated in the big cities. Since public opinion in democracies, and especially in the USA is made in the big cities, and since the Jews in the USA control all elements of public opinion such as the press, publishing, radio, parties, clubs and so on, one can affirm that the Jews control public opinion in North America. The following table presents the distribution of Jews in the USA:

New York has 2,000,000 Jews, 33% of the population
Philadelphia has 280,000 Jews, 15% of the population.
Cleveland has 12,000 Jews, 8% of the population
Chicago has 260,000 Jews, 8% of the population
Boston has 85,000 Jews, 12% of the population
Baltimore has 70,000 Jews, 17% of the population
Pittsburgh has 60,000 Jews, 17% of the population
Saint Louis has 60,000 Jews, 18% of the population
New Orleans has 55,000 Jews, 16% of the population
Detroit has 50,000 Jews, 17% of the population
Hartford has 27,000 Jews, 17% of the population
The increase in the number of Jews since the turn of the century is particularly clear in the case of New York. The number of Jews there has increased as follows:

From 225,000 in 1877
To 597,674 in 1900
To 1,252,135 in 1910
To 1,643,012 in 1920
To 1,876.545 in 1930
To over 2 million in 1935 (counting only religious Jews).
Some areas of New York business life are Jewish monopolies. They have taken over the clothing industry and a substantial part of the cigarette industry. They are heavily involved in some light industries. The big New York department stores are owned by Jews. The American magazine "National American" gives the following illuminating figures:

The Jews control:

98% of the financial markets
99% of the banking industry
69% of the food industry
100% of the theater and movie industry
99% of the press
82% of the radio, telephone, and telegraph industries
75% of the transportation industries
85% of real estate.
The following Jews have key positions in the economy, government, legal system, state and local governments, labor unions, etc.:

The Jew Bernhard Mannes Baruch was the most influential man in the USA during the World War. He had dictatorial power over the whole war economy and its approximately 40 varied industrial branches. Even today he has a leading role in Roosevelt's inner circle. Felix Frankfurter is a member of the Supreme Court, Henry Morgenthau Jr. is Secretary of the Treasury, Herman Lehmann is Governor of the State of New York, La Guardia leads the Jewish metropolis New York. Numerous Jews have leading positions in the American labor movement. One need mention only the Jews Volman, Sidney Hillmann, Schloßberg and Matthew Woll. Wherever one looks he sees nothing but Jews and genuine Hebrews! The words of the Russian-born Jew Baruch Chareny Vladek describe precisely the position of the Jews in America: "We are numerically in the minority, but our fingers tip the scales."

That is how it is: He who is fed by the Jews dies, particularly when the national body is still so young, disunified and weak as the USA. We see all the manifestations of the Jews that always accompany the Jews. For example, the USA is the leading country for lodges, secret societies, the Ku-Klux-Klan, sects and spiritualists. There are about 4,178,000 Free Masons in the entire world; 3.3 million of them live in the USA. All leading men of the government, from the president on down, belong to lodges, and all the lodges of course belong to and are led by the Jews. There are 49 major lodges in the USA with 16,518 branches. One cannot even count the sects and secret societies. We see that the Jew has understood how to break the USA down into individual particles and atoms, killing any kind of national life. The parties belong to him entirely, for over half of those in Congress — 213 members of the House — and more than half of the Senators, 48 in all — are Free Masons.

Gangsters and criminals along with stock traders are other manifestations of decay brought about by Jewry. The legal system in the USA is fragmented and disunified. The benefactors are the plutocrats, corrupt politicians and businessmen without consciences. Judges are elected to their offices for a limited time. It is clear than they are dependent on the corrupt parties. Major insurance swindles, corrupting juries, and making false statements under oath are the order of the day.

According to "Century Magazine" of July 1910: "American lawlessness begins in children's rooms and schools and ends in courthouses and lawmaking bodies." The legal uncertainly is called a "national burden," which is made even worse by the fact that cooperation is also lacking in the police system. It is not surprising that crime rates are higher in the USA than anywhere else in the world. The following figures from 1939 demonstrate the fact. There was:

a robbery every 9 minutes
a break-in every 1 3/4 minutes
a theft every 40 seconds
a car theft every 2 1/4 minutes
a murder every 39 minutes
Leading gangsters in Chicago included John Dillinger, who was overpowered and shot by the police at a theater at the close of 1934 and Al Capone, who had a bodyguard of 185 men, each of whom he paid $300 to $400 a week. Two thirds of Chicago unions had to pay protection money to these criminal organizations. Al Capone was so connected to America's leading men that he went to jail not because he was the leader of a gangster organization, but because the federal authorities caught him for tax fraud. He lives as a multimillionaire today in a palace on a sunny beach in Florida.

The Coster-Musica scandal aroused considerable excitement in the American business world at the end of 1938. Coster-Musica had carried out swindles on a widespread scale, including drug smuggling, weapons sales, and crooked dealings, and was a member of many prominent clubs. Coster-Musica had been in jail for fraud as yearly as 1906. He was convicted in a huge financial scandal in 1913. Given his connections to "high society," he did not serve time in prison. His company collapsed when the fraud was discovered. 13,500 stockholders lost over $100 million. He committed suicide because he feared his well-placed friends were no longer able to protect him from the wrath of those he had cheated.

American capital developed in the course of the 18th and 19th centuries either through land speculation, railroad enterprises, or big industry. The ship owner Girard, J. J. Astor, Peter Golet, and the Schermerhorns, Fealds, Vanderbilts, Goulds, Sages, Morgans, Hills, Carnegies, Roosevelt, Morgenthau, and so on were typical of those who amassed their wealth with bribery, cheating, plundering, lawbreaking, tax evasion, swindles, extortion, and piracy.

The first great fortune was Vanderbilt's, which grew out of the railways. Cornelius Vanderbilt, born in 1794, at age twelve could hardly write his own name, but he was greedy, ruthless, and power-hungry. He began with passengers and freight. He was never particularly creative, though he was presented as such in books. He was certainly the leading merchant pirate and scoundrel of his day. His first millions were primarily the result of extortion, cheating, and theft. The mail his steam ships carried won not only foreign postage payments, but also substantial government subsidies. The postal subsidies were the real foundation of his wealth. The Civil War put an end to his shipping career. He began a railroad enterprise at the age of 69, though he knew nothing at all about the technology and administration of this branch of transportation. Cornelius Vanderbilt knew how to present himself as a leading patriot during the Civil War. When the Union government decided to send a fleet to New Orleans in 1862, it bought the very ships from Vanderbilt that government subsidies had built. He even lent one of his unused ships to the government. By means of manipulation Vanderbilt succeeded in driving down the stocks of the New York and Harlem railroad at the end of 1863, and bought the majority of the shares, which rose from $9 a share in the middle of April 1863 to $50. It was also the usual practice to bribe the New York City council to secure certain railroad lines.

They are all the same, Dillinger, Al Capone, Vanderbilt, Carnegie, Morgan, and so on: gangsters, pirates, stock traders, businessmen. They have a single ideal: money-making, and still more money-making. American lawlessness and the double morality of Calvinism and Puritanism conceals it all

IV. The Dollar Devours Everything

There is not a country in the world where money is as important as it is in the USA. The ideals of family, fatherland, culture and manliness are all dominated by the desire to "make money." While the peoples of Europe bled during the World War of 1914-1918, North America knew but one principle: to earn as much as possible through the war.
The stock prices climbed into the heavens. A rise from $20 to $1000 was no rarity. And these crazy profits did not stop after the World War. The armaments tycoons bought back the airplanes, weapons, and munitions for a song, and then sold them at a fat profit to other customers. Profiteering without end.

60 Families Rule America

F. Lundberg's book appeared in 1937, and is seen by American politicians as a reliable source. He begins with the blunt assertion: "The United States of America is owned and controlled by a hierarchy that at its core consists of the 60 richest families of the country, to which at most 90 families of somewhat lesser wealth may be included. These families are the center of the modern industrial oligarchy that controls the United States. They function discretely under a de jure democratic form of government, behind which a de facto government of abolutistic and plutocratic nature has existed since the Civil War." This hollowing out of democracy was possible only because enormous fortunes developed in the United States that have no parallel in the rest of the world.

The extent of the wealth controlled by the "golden ring," the sixty richest families in America, is astonishing. Rockefeller's personal income in 1924 was $30-50 million, though his taxable income was only $18 million. His total fortune certainly exceeds a billion dollars, and those of the Melons and the Ponts is surely no less. Such a concentration of wealth by itself is extraordinarily powerful, a state within a state, but the power of money and the dollar dynasties extends yet further. The real nature of the power of the "golden ring" is less in personal wealth as in the control that they are thereby able to exert over others. The foundation here is the expansion of so-called stock capital. In 1880 16% of the total capital of the United States was in such "liquid assets," a figure that had reached 40% by 1930.

Stock majorities are guided, holding companies established, the various interests are so concealed and covered up in a way that enables them to become suddenly public when it is necessary. With amazing lack of scruples, huge fortunes are made in ways that put gangsters and pirates to shame.

Old Rockefeller used to say with Puritan hypocrisy, after he had taken someone's money, that "God gave me my wealth." J.P. Morgan the elder, however, displayed a deeper knowledge of the source of his wealth. Half in jest, half seriously, he claimed that one of his ancestors was the famous Caribbean pirate Henry Morgan. He named his black luxury yacht the "Corsair," and loved to fly the Jolly Roger, the skull and crossbones, above the Stars and Stripes when on the high seas. His son is said to continue the custom, except that as the American financial agent of the British government during the World War, he preferred to fly the Union Jack above the Jolly Roger,

Corrupt bureaucrats over the decades understood how to transfer billions in public property to people who understood how to give a golden handshake. Some of these bubbles collapsed, giving the citizens of the United States a look at the swamp of its government. For example, the major scandal with oil reserves under the government of Harding — 1921 to 1923 — might have had something to do with the president's mysterious death.

The extent and subtlety of the corrupt system in the freest land in the world was revealed a few years ago when a Senate committee investigated the list of favorites to whom the J.P. Morgan Company sold cheap stocks in 1929. Beside the many financial potentates were names like Calvin Coolidge, who had been president until 1929, William H. Woodin, Roosevelt's Treasury Secretary in 1933, W. G. McAdoo, Treasury Secretary under Wilson and Senator from California, Ch. F. Adams, Naval Secretary and Bernard M. Baruch, organizer of the war economy during the World War and also one of Roosevelt's most influential Jewish advisors. The number of cases in which the power of money was enough to blind the eyes of justice is legion. Nowhere are as many scoundrels running around loose as in the United States. When a scandal stinks so badly that one of the "greats" must be punished, for example Samuel Insull or Van Swerigen, it is always a fringe figure, an agent of the leading families, never a member of the "golden ring" itself. Senator Norris, with the healthy instincts of a Nebraska farmer, was outraged when in the 1939 scandal the two most heavily implicated figures, the Interior Secretary Fall and the Industrialist Sinclair were acquitted. He said sarcastically: "We should pass a law which says that a man who is worth $100 million may not be brought to trial. Then our laws would at least correspond to reality."

This unimaginable wealth stands in contrast to enormous poverty. In the end, those who are betrayed are the millions of workers and farmers, the broad masses of the people. The American people will be the victims of this war as well. They will pay the price for the increased profits of the upper ten thousand. 21,000 new millionaires came out of the last war, and the previous ones became a lot richer. The same will happen in this war. The American armaments industry will earn a lot and the poor stupid people will pay the bills. It will also have to pay a price in blood, and not a small one.

Just as in England, the people have a limited role in the "democracy."

Unfortunately, the common impression that American workers have a high standard of living is a myth.

A Third of the Population Lives in Poverty

Roosevelt himself saw himself forced after his second election to tell Congress: "I see several tens of millions of our citizens — a significant part of our population — who even today lack much of what we consider the absolute minimum necessities of life. I see millions of families who must live with an income so modest that the pale of family disaster hangs over them day by day. I see millions in the cities and the countryside whose live under conditions that a so-called decent society would have termed indecent even fifty years ago. I see millions to whom education, recreation and the possibility of improving their lives and those of their children are denied. I see millions who lack the means to buy the products of our factories and farms, and who through their poverty deny work and productivity to millions of others."

Roosevelt's words clearly show the results of his efforts at "reconstruction." And he was by no means painting too dark a picture. His statements are supported by numerous reports and statistics from official sources that prove conclusively that the common European idea of the comfortable life of the American worker is in no way accurate. That is also clear to anyone who walks through the numerous side streets in New York and Brooklyn, or who visits a sharecropper in the "cotton belt."

Unemployment is unimaginable. Despite the New Deal and the Social Security Administration, despite the land's riches of every variety, despite vast and fruitful soil, despite technology and the much-praised American progress, Roosevelt has not succeeded in reducing the numing it unnecessary to discuss it here. Capitalist greed has leveled the forests and produced drought and wind storms. Everything has become desert, and whole regions have been ruined. The world knows that the misery of the American farmer is a catastrophe that the government is unable to do anything about,

American workers know nothing about such social benefits as old age care, care for the handicapped or accident and health insurance. Roosevelt's New Deal has attempted to copy the German model. The copy is a bad one. The renowned social apostle is bluffing here as everywhere else. Despite complicated regulations, only a small number of workers enjoy a decent retirement. Insurance against accidents, industries mishaps,and illness simply does not exist.

Women, children and young people are exploited in the most shameless fashion in "God's own country." To give only one example, girls in the tobacco industry in Ohio still work unlimited hours under dangerous conditions for $10 a week. After four or five years, most are sick with tuberculosis and are thrown out on the street because the owner would otherwise have to pay unemployment insurance. Thousands of new and cheap workers are waiting at the door, willing to sacrifice their health for low wages.

The best Americans, such as the famed American political philosopher Daniel Webster, the theoretician of the Whig Party, predicted the effects of a similarly deficient social system in these words: "The freest government will not long survive if wealth is concentrated in a few hands while the great masses of the people become dependent and poverty-stricken."

V. Franklin D. Roosevelt's Complete Bankruptcy

Everything that Daniel Webster feared and despised has come to pass in the USA. Even worse! The idiocy and criminality have increased, and no one sees a way out. Franklin D. Roosevelt proclaimed a New Deal in 1933 as a way to end the misery. Since this invention of Mr. Roosevelt's Brain Trust has caused so much confusion, I wish here to briefly summarize it and comment critically on it.

The New Deal is a collection of economic policy measures that Roosevelt implemented from 1933 to 1935, of which recent measures are a continuation.

The central points are:

Measures to increase purchasing power: (Farm Credit Act, protection of bankruptcy, public and private jobs, increased and stabilized wages, repricing of agricultural products and raw materials, devaluation to increase exports);

Establishing Unified Labor Legislation: (universal labor conditions, working hours, pay, right to organize, mediation system);

Introducing Social Security Measures: (unemployment compensation, workmen's compensation, Social Security).

The "New Deal" presumes cooperation between employers, workers and the government. This could only result because of the severity of the crisis, and the traditional American individualism immediately sabotaged it as soon as enormous public expenditures seemed to lead to improvements in some areas.

The "New Deal" was an expression of federal economic leadership. But it lacked the necessary bureaucracy, which had until then not existed in the USA.

The political conditions necessary for the "New Deal" economic policies were also lacking. The party and Congressional systems remained unchanged, as did the other institutions (the Supreme Court), which meant that business and labor circles influenced the legislative process.

The "New Deal" tried to have a planned economy without effective planning. The various measures were not coordinated with each other. The result: bureaucratic infighting, the influence of political moods, the pressures of election propaganda, the power of unemployed voters, the misuse of tax moneys for these purposes, "the use of social misery for electoral purposes." The "New Deal" was thus a confused liberal system. "The capitalists presented themselves as socialist!"

Fact: Roosevelt amassed $40 billion in debt prior to the beginning of the war.

The number of unemployed rose, after initial declines from 1938-1939, significantly, until the unimaginable figure of 11,300,000 was reached.

Roosevelt's policies have failed utterly.

VI. The Background to Roosevelt's Policies

The background to these policies is not easy to see. There are two primary explanations current in American circles:

First Explanation:

Roosevelt is a member of the American plutocratic class.

The social conditions in 1932-1933 presented the danger of revolution.

American capitalism sent one of its best humbugs to preach salvation to the masses.

He succeeded by using all the tricks of American propaganda.

The capitalist clique was ready to intervene at the proper moment,

The program was torpedoed at the proper moment by means of a bribed Supreme Court. The measures had served their purpose, namely to conceal the growing social misery. To guarantee armaments profits, the humbug Roosevelt was put to work on foreign policy. The methods were hate propaganda, war hysteria, and armaments.

Second Explanation:

Roosevelt, a plutocratic son, is a confidante of American Jews and Free Masons.

The catastrophic economic situation in 1932-1933 offered the Jews the opportunity to take over both the industrialists and the workers.

Roosevelt was put to work with his plan of salvation.

Labor and management became involuntary captives of the "New Deal," and helped bring about its failure.

Foreign policy was the only way out. The Jews were out for revenge against Greater Germany. Once again, hate propaganda, war hysteria, and armaments.

Both views are true. Roosevelt, the son of plutocrats, served American capitalism, and as a Jewish product served them, too. Since American capitalists are mostly Jews, both are in the end the same.

VII. Ancestry and Relatives of F. D. Roosevelt and his Wife.

This picture of current conditions in the USA would be incomplete without considering the ancestry and relatives of the warmonger Roosevelt. I will therefore discuss the matter briefly here. I hold to strict facts, without making any assumptions.

The "Detroit Jewish Chronicle," a Jewish newspaper, reported in 1935 that Roosevelt was descended from the Spanish Jew Rossocampo. In 1939 Adolf Schmalix concluded in his "Are the Roosevelts Jewish?" that Roosevelt is the descendant of a Dutch family whose earliest member is the farmer Claes Martensen, who was named after his farm, called "Het Roosevelt." On the other hand, it is clear that the Roosevelts took on Jewish blood through marriage once in the United States. Schmalix proves that as early as the second generation on American soil (from the 17th to the 18th Century), a Jewess Sarah Salomons joined the Roosevelt family. The mother of President Roosevelt was Sarah Delano, who Schmalix maintains was a descendant of the Italian or Spanish Jewish family Delano (Dillan, Delan, or Dillano).

The President held a press conference on 20 March 1935 on the matter of his presumed Jewish ancestry ("Neue freie Presse," Vienna). Roosevelt said: "My ancestors came to America from Holland over 300 years ago. I am not worried about whether or not they were Jewish." Schmalix notes: "This is a clear case of Talmud morality." Schmalix says that Mrs. Roosevelt's mother was Anna Rebekka Hall, and notes: "There are many families named Hall in the USA, some of Jewish origin, others of Christian origin from Germany or England." (p. 17)

The oldest son James Roosevelt, formerly the president's private secretary, is vice chairman of Samuel Goldwyn's well-known Jewish film company. Roosevelt's Jewish environment and the influence of Jewry on the USA has already been sufficiently discussed.

Conclusion.

When Roosevelt became president, not only millions of Americans, but people around the world asked "What does Roosevelt want?" Many hoped that the new American president would combat the need and misery, gangsterism and plutocracy, the power of Jewry. Those who put their hope in him did not realize his Jewish connections. Roosevelt disappointed their hopes and went in the opposite direction. Roosevelt has sworn allegiance to Jewry.

Jewry has had two centers in recent decades: New York and Moscow, London, Paris, Prague, Warsaw, Geneva, and other Jewish centers were of secondary importance. In Moscow the Jew ruled with GPU methods: murder and the most blatant exploitation. In New York, he used his financial strength. To win over America for the Jewish war against Germany, Jewry infiltrated plutocratic circles. They believed that they had finished off Europe for good through the Treaty of Versailles, since they had defeated Germany, the heart and soul of the continent, once and for all. They believed they had eliminated it as a factor. The plutocrats wanted to inherit the wealth of our ancient part of the world. They thought the time had come when for a few dollars they could buy all the European culture that had had been built with so much effort and sacrifice over a time span of 4500 years. Who could stop them? The American newcomers were already imagining themselves in possession of our splendid and immortal cultural values. In a few years everything would be forgotten and everything would be Americanized. That is what these cultural ignoramuses thought, who themselves have no culture or traditions.

They are mistaken!

Their time is far distant. In fact, it will never come! This war that Roosevelt and Churchill are waging on behalf of Jewry will end with the victory of the young peoples who the plutocrats have mocked as have-nots, whose last possessions they wanted to steal.

A new world order is coming! Jewry will have nothing to say about it. The power of the plutocrats will be broken forever.

The judgment on Roosevelt and Churchill will be as follows: Not only have they plunged foreign peoples into a world war, they have sacrificed and betrayed their own people in the interests of Jewry.


 
Old August 2nd, 2008 #3
Adi18
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Mazonnawar Citadel
Posts: 775
Default

Quote:
A. E. Johann, Das Land ohne Herz: Eine Reise ins unbekannte Amerika (Berlin: Deutscher Verlag, 1942).


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Excerpts from The Land Without a Heart


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
p. 24: "For what was gone with the wind after the Civil War was the old America in which people were judged by their human worth and their real value, not by their fortune or bank account."

p. 25: "Until the Civil War, the population of the United States was almost entirely of Nordic stock. But the needs of the feverishly growing American industry for cheap, submissive workers, preferably with limited English, led to a flooding of America with Eastern European and Jewish masses, drawn from everywhere. Driven by the most primitive mass instincts, they were only superficially capable of assimilation. The population of the United States, already seriously compromised by the Negroes, became a hopeless jumble."

p. 27: "If one applies European concepts to the United States, one sees that within a few decades the anonymous, rootless power of capital crushed and destroyed the old nobility, the free and independent citizenry, and the independent farming class. If one may use a frequent and often misused word, human freedom itself was destroyed. The methods were different, but the results identical with what happened under Bolshevism, with the same ice-cold contempt for humanity."

p. 166: Johann is discussing the Okie migration to California in the 1930's. They came to a bad end."With very few exceptions it was the best Nordic stock that met its bitter fate here: Americans from formerly good families of Irish, German, English, Scottish, Swedish, Norwegian, Norman, or Breton ancestry. And their fate is a terrible accusation against the American system, which reduces people to numbers and sees everything only from a single standpoint: profit. May the world collapse, may hundreds of thousands, even millions perish — as long as the profits are good. What kind of world is it in which workers prefer to sleep in the fields rather than back in camp out of fear that otherwise someone else will steal their job the next morning! And all this for 60 cents a day..."

p. 198: Roosevelt on 11 October 1941 reports that half of those called for military service were unfit."In Germany, which Roosevelt has threatened with destruction, since it presumably is hindering the American Standard, the American Century, the percentage of those rejected for military service has never exceeded five percent. It is understandable that Roosevelt hates the Germans. How dare they defeat him with a single fact: five percent vs. fifty percent!"

p. 199: "National Socialism within a few years made unemployment, that terrible specter of modern humanity, into only a nightmarish memory. Roosevelt, despite the new deal and billions of dollars, was never able to bring the unemployment figure under ten million."

p. 202: "Chicago is filled with chaos more than any other American city that I know. It seems to me the very model of America, for America too is filled with chaos, terrible chaos, filled with excess, destruction and desolation."

p. 263: The conclusion to the book: "It was not the goal of this book to discuss whether America can win the war, or whether it must lose it. But perhaps it has become clear —and that was my goal — that America does not deserve to win the war and spread its system over the entire world. There is nothing in the American system worth imitating, either for Germany or Europe. If Americanism conquered the world, it would mean the end of all human values and of genuine freedom — the freedom to do something, not from something! — of all the values for which Europe has fought and suffered for millennia, for which it has given all its strength of body and soul.

No European could exchange places with an American. America is a pitiable country and the Americans are a betrayed people, betrayed by their leaders, betrayed and deceived in a simply indescribable way by their self chosen leader Franklin Delano Roosevelt. He spoke of helping the common man, but filled his election campaign fund with donations from uncaring capitalists. He began by wanting to loose the capitalist chains, but became as much a tool of Morgan as any of his predecessors."


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Karl Schotte, Letter to an American Friend


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



KARL L. SCHOTTE
Berlin-Lankwitz,
Dürkheimerstrasse 14,
GERMANY.


August 7th, 1933.

Dear Ken:

Dont think that I am going to be taken to an insane asylum nor that the world is coming to an end. This is not so, and I must object very sincerely if the fact of my sitting down again after only several months write a letter to you gives you such impressions. The reason for this outstanding event is much rather the hotheaded criticism about Hitler and his Government which you gave us in your recent letter to Ruth, and which indeed surprised me very much. However, before giving you my point of view on the new turn that has taken place in Germany I should like to ask you to in the first place do me the favour of keeping your shirt on, otherwise it is you who is making "an ass of himself". One should never speak the language of a truckdriver, no matter how much one likes it. Now, don't be mad, but calm down. You did not hurt Ruths or my feelings at all, but there are two reasons why I feel I should answer you. The first reason is that your remarks are very unfair to Hitler and his new Government, and the other is that I intend to do my share in preventing the your American generation to which you belong to be equally as ignorant as the generation of the whole world was which tumbled into the last war. What makes you believe and in such a definite way state that we are unable to see the things as they are, since, as you write, we are hypnotized by Hitler. It is not true, that you and all those of our friends who you claim take the same viewpoint as you are taking are basing your opinion upon reports and comments of American newspapers and perhaps upon interviews of American visitors who recently have been in Germany, and while you are willing to disregard certain exaggerations you readily accept the rest as the truth? Is it not possible that thus you are receiving but one side of the story? You know that the American Press endeavouring to please the socalled taste for sensational news of the American Public is working according to the countrywide newspaper principal: All the news thats fit to print, and be it even lies. I do not belong to those who claim that it is the American people who have such taste, but instead it is the American Press which in order to obtain the attention of the reader considers any means good enough to beat competition. You will never find such crookedness among decent business. Such business spirit is identified all over the world with the jewish business spirit. You must not misunderstand me. Such spirit can be found among Christian Jews as well as among Jewish Christians, if you get what I mean. Nevertheless it is all over the world condemned as the jewish spirit. You will not doubt this, I suppose? Perhaps in this connection you will find it interesting to recall that the inventor of the most unchivalrous means to fight the enemy, namely the father of all newspaper liars, Lord Northcliffe was a Jew. When comparing the basis of your knowledge about presentday Germany with the basis of our knowledge, dont you think that ours at least is a broader basis? Dont you think that the possibility of witnessing present developments in Germany combined with the ability of reading and understanding American newspapers can represent an ideal basis of knowledge for such person who - and this is the important thing - is free of all feelings of hatred against either one of the two countries? The Berlin Correspondents of the American newspapers are not such persons. Many of them are jews and many have taken a hostile attitude towards Germany long before Hitler ever appeared on the stage of German Public Life. This includes also Mr. Mowrer of the Chicago Herald Tribune who, as I saw from the New York Times received this years Putlitzer Prise of Journalism for his "excellent" articles on the German development. A year ago a German Democrat, mind you, not a Nazi, expressed astonishment that I should like to call upon Mr. Mowrer, since this "excellent" American reporter has long enjoyed the reputation even among German Democrats of being a Germanhater. This hostility towards Germany on the part of American Correspondents in Berlin indeed could much more entitle me to claim that it is you who is hypnotized namely by the American Press in general.

Dear Kenneth, not until today in August 23rd could I find time to continue this letter. When rereading what I so far have said above I doubt if it is of any use to speak to you the way I did. I know you are not anti-German, and yet while having received your school education at a time of outright hostility towards Germany your mind is only to readily inclined to accept any piece of news about Germany as true and the correct version as long as this piece of news is presented in such form which is free from obvious sensational exaggeration. Since, however no piece of news published in the American papers is reporting favourably on the German Nationalsocialistic Revolution your mind is systematically kept from turning pro-German. This is the work of jewish influence in the American Press. In face of such mental attitude of yours you naturally hesitate to accept as the correct version anything which is told you by someone who on one hand is not even a 100% American Citizen and on the other hand is, as you know pro-German. For this reason I doubt if I can change anything of your attitude towards Hitlerite Germany and of the attitude of those of our friends who, as you claim take the same viewpoint as you are taking. When, however, after reconsideration I continue this letter it is, because even if I should not convince you I wish to do my share in trying to destroy this hostile spirit of the American People towards Germany and especially to contribute making the young Americans a more broadminded generation.

In the following I am going to copy part of my last letter to Mr. Houston. The article I sent him months ago intersted him very much. Unfortunately as he told me it was not written in good enough English. I naturally am rather disappointed that my English still is too poor. But even if my English had been correct there would have been no possibility to place my article Mr. Houston wrote, not saying of course that any favourable viewpoint is prevented from publication in the American Press. Here is what I answered him.

" ——— Wheras the American papers beyond doubt are carrying a tremendous amount of material about Germany from their regular correspondents, and no number of interviews from all kinds of people who recently have been in Germany, all this material, and be it even just a report, is skilfully presented in such form which seemingly intentially aims at being equally offensive for Hitler and his new Government through ridiculing his deads as giving nourishment to anti-German sentiment. Most of the recent American visitors in Germany seem to be of the type of jews whose hatred towards Hitlerite Germany is a fanatical one. They of course are not in a position to give a true picture to their countrymen of what they have seen or heard. Mr. Michael Williams, editor of The Commonweal, president of the Calvert Association, and a member of the Committee appointed by the American Committee on Religious Reports and Minorities to go to Germany and investigate conditions published a report (New York Times of June 14th) of his own private visit, since the committees visit was postponed. He claimed to have spent "nearly" two weeks in Berlin interviewing members of the Hitler Government, leading business and professional men, both German and American, as well as Protestant, Catholic, and Jewish leaders. Not one single name is mentioned in his report. "One of the most prominent German political leaders"(?) told him that the outlawing of the Jews was a mistake comparable only to the invasion of Belgium at the outbreak of the World War. It is plain that such a remark, if it really was made, could be made only by a person equally hostile towards Germany as Mr. Williams himself. Maybe this interview took place at a concentration camp. When returning to America these people cry: Democracy is at an end in Germany. But they are anxiously concealing the truth that before Hitler came jewish democratic corruption has brought Germany on the verge of Communism. Such "Democracy" indeed is at an end now in Germany. All this excitement about democracy being at an end and about "persecutions" and outlawing of the German Jews who amount to but 1% of the total German population seems very strange indeed when compared with the calmness with which the world took the cruelty and terrorism of the Russian Revolution which, as everyone knows, was prepared and created by Jews and by jewish money. Too bad that Mr. James G. McDonald, chairman of the Foreign Policy Association, can find nothing better for him to do than to call upon all American Christians to step into line with Rabbi Jonah B. Wise, as I see from the New York Times of June 15th and July 11th. He too has recently been in Germany, and on July 11th the New York Times published his address in Chautauqua, N.Y. dealing with his visit in Germany and with the situation there as it existed more than three months ago, namely on April 1st, at the time of the (24 hours) anti-Jews boycott. The report in the paper was headed by the remark: Statements that Jews are not being cruelly treated in Germany were termed "an insult to the intelligence" by James G. McDonald. Thus the American Public is made to believe that Mr. McDonald is furnishing an up-to-date denial for all new reports about improving conditions in Germany. Such is the way matters about Germany are twisted in the American Press. Senator Wagner too has stepped into line with Rabbi Wise as I have noticed. I regret it, but I am convinced that many people have done so because of absolute misinformation about presentday Germany. People trying to argue in favour of Hitlerite Germany, as Mr. Bernard Ridder tried to do, are quickly being ridiculed as one may see from the New York Times comment of June 14th, and I doubt if the wellknown Radio announcer Douglas Brinkley who during his visit in Germany in Berlin Talkies expressed his admiration for Hitler and this new Germany ever again will be allowed to broadcast in America. The Berlin correspondents of the American Press fall in line with the above mentioned general attitude towards Germany. I suppose they have to in order to keep their jobs. This might be easy for them, since many of them are Jews and some are known to be hostile towards Germany long before Hitler ever appeared in front of German Public Life. Under such circumstances it seems plain to me that any viewpoint favourable for Germany would today not be considered by the big American papers, since jewish influence in the American Press is much too strong.

Dear Mr. Houston, when in the above I have given you my opinion about American Public Opinion it was done, because I feel confident that you will not misunderstand me. When I am arguing for Hitler and in favour of presentday Germany it is not only because of the many great deeds of Hitler (uniting the German people, crushing Communism, successfully fighting unemployment) but also because I positively know that the only way to serve the purpose of German American friendship is to bring about mutual respect between the people of the two countries. To accomplish this one must fight for mutual respect between Opinion in America and in Germany. German Public Opinion and the Germany People are showing this respect for America. Everyone here is speaking of the courage and leadership of Franklin D. Roosevelt in terms of admiration. It is up to American Public Opinion to give honour where honour is due.

So much about my letter to Mr. Houston. Now I shall give you part of my article which I sent to Mr. Houston and which he showed to Dr. Wilbur Thomas, the Director of the Carl Schurz Foundation, and to Dr. Carl Ackerman, the Dean of the School of Journalism at Columbia University. Although, as I said above it is not written in good English, Mr. Houston as well as the two other gentlemen found the article very interesting. Here is what I said back in May 1933.

After a short introduction I wrote: "The world war was won not with the sword but with the pen. This is a German opinion which is shared also by a good many Americans. Apart from now one might think on this subject nobody today would deny the fact that the pen, if used as a weapon, can proove to be a mightly deadly sword. If now we wish to liquidate the world war, if we seriously endeavour to promote world peace, to promote good relationship between the nations of the world it seems to be absolutely essential that we should stop using war weapons and stop tolerating warlike propaganda. In other words, we should do all we can to prevent endangering good relationship between countries. Claiming to be well acquainted with German political troubles of past years as well as with the mentality of the German People I feel that the American newspaperreader is not at all put in a position to get a clear and true conception about Germany. Above all it is to my mind equally silly as it is preventing the education of the American people if the American newspaperreader is left to believe that the Germans are a barbaric nation. The absurdity of such statements does not make them less dangerous to good relationship between the American and the German people. If in the following I am dealing with the fundamental achievement and the fundamental aim of the German national socialistic revolution I am doing it for the benefit of a better understanding between the American and the German people. This better understanding is the more necessary the more we wish to prevent that a few years of animosity between the two countries should be permitted to destroy a century old friendship between the American and the German people. Contrary to political custome Hitler said in his address to the masses on the Tempelhof field on May 1st that he is not going to tell the workman how important for the Nation the labourman and his work are, and turn around and speak to the intelligent class of people as if to the cream of the Nation, and turn around again and speak to the peasant telling him how valuable he is. On the contrary he is going to demonstrate to one class of people the importance and the value of the other. This attitude is not only wise, but it also reveals the mystery of this sudden sense of unity that has come over the German people. When I am going to apply the same methods while writing to America about Germany, it is because making one people understand and respect another people might equally well proove to be the best method to bring about the much longed for mutual understanding between the nations of the world.

The German nationalsocialistic revolution beginning on January 30th, still in full swing today, and going to be carried out furthermore for an indefinite time to come is a revolution of mind. It is a revolution of the national mind as well as of the social mind of the people. Only a short time ago American Correspondents and travelling newspapermen used to report from Germany that the growing of the Hitlerite Party was the outcome of general dissatisfaction and hardship. If this had been the case, if Hitler had gained support merely on the ground of promising the same bread and work with all of his .....

(page missing)

possibility of such development before taking place in Germany, Hitler succeeded in changing the minds of his followers from the Communist rank and file. They no more are Communists, but Nationalsocialists. They have killed in themselves that hatred they felt towards the rich and towards the white-collar-man, in general to an equal extent as this white-collar-man and this rich man have been made to no more look down upon the workman or anybody doing manual labour. It is true, not all of Germany has turned to nationalsocialism. However while for this very reason Hitlers revolution still is in full swing, and will be carried out furthermore until such time when this final aim is reached, a new election, if held today, might well show an increase of the nationalsocialsit vote from 17.5 million on March 5th to close to 30 million out of a total electorate of about 44 million votes.

Hitlers revolution of mind, as I have tried to explain it, in no way is representing a danger to world peace, and again it seems strange that Hitlers assurances to keep peace frequently are ignored in reports printed in the foreign Press. As impressive as this German revolution of mind might be to the foreign observer who knows Germany and the German people it is only reasonable that it cannot be equally impressive to those Americans who not yet have had a chance to visit and get acquainted with Germany. After all, this new German spirit is nothing new to us in America. Republicans and Democrats, both call it the true democratic spirit. The workman in America always has been as much respected as the white-collar-man, and our boys have long been working their way through College through manual labour. However, for this very reason it seems to me that no people is better equipped mentally to understand this new Germany and its leader than the American people.

If when writing about the Germany nationalsocialistic revolution I would fail to touch the jewish problem in Germany the reader indeed would miss an important explanation to a new German attitude which has created worldwide interest and partly even new animosity. Endeavouring to from and impartial point of view seek an explanation for this change in Germany one must realize two outstanding facts. One is that the percentage of Jews in Germany indeed is exceptionally small and the other is that this small percentage in postwar years has enjoyed an undue large share of public influence. While moreover a great many Jewish names are connected with all kinds of affairs of administrative corruption of postwar Germany thus making it all the easier for Hitler and his followers to gain countrywide support when calling for a radical reduction of the Jewish influence, it is wrong to regard this attitude as an affront to the Jewish religion. This it is not. Instead this attitude is directed against a postwar political system which has discredited the marxistic parties in Germany and the Jews, since many of them have played such prominent part in cooperation with those parties and the many cases of illoyalty and dishonesty they have been connected with. When I said above that the small percentage of Jews in Germany in postwar years so far have enjoyed an undue large share of public influence, this was possible because of their close cooperation with the marxistic parties. In other words it was not superior ability which entitled them to such share but political pull. Until recently conditions in Germany indeed were of such kind that many a Christian student would cease studying, since he had to realize that his road of future was blocked by political interests, whereas the jewish student would keep on studying knowing perfectly well that his father, although perhaps a businessman and not a politician, nevertheless had sufficient political pull to pave his way. In such development the new Germany sees a controlling increase of the Jewish element in the field of education which the Jewish population percentage in Germany does not justify. Hand in hand with this development the possibility of marrying has thus been made so much easier for the young Jewish generation, which fact in turning no doubt is contributing to increasing the population percentage of the German Jews to the disadvantage of the other confessions. Such developments are of no little importance for Germany, and while today under the Hitler Government a radical change is being made this radicalism is not directed against each single Jewish citizen. On the contrary the form in which the new laws are being applied show a liberal spirit and reveal the truth that the attitude of Hitler Germany towards this Jewish problem ought to correctly be regarded as directed against a political system of corruption with which the German Jews unfortunately so impressively have identified themselves."

So much from my article. I hope I have put it clear enough to realize that the Jewish problem in Germany is a question of life or death of the German race. If such development as was tolerated before Hitler came should be permitted to continue it should be obvious for everyone that in the course of time the face of the German population would change considerably. Germany, as you know, has a population of 66 million people. Among these 66 million are but about 600,000 Jewish citizen. Under those circumstances as described above this small percentage in the course of time could increase rapidly because of conditions of life being more protected against all hardship, marriages being made easier because of professional and business protection which safeguard in turn enables the Jewish woman to give birth to children. Moreover it should be easy to realize that favouring the Jewish element to such an extent as was done before Hitler came necessarily leads to giving away the top positions in Government, industry, and education to Jews, while on the other hand the German race of Protestant and Catholic confession is being pushed back into positions of no influence which in turn in the course of time will make them unable to lead their own country because of being deprived the necessary educational training in matters of administration, big business, and education. At the same time their population percentage of now 99% is rapidly decreasing because of the German woman through hardship of life and uncertainty because of the German woman through hardship of life and uncertainty of the husbands future being unable to give birth to children.

Dear Kenneth, my English might be very poor, but I hope you get what I am trying to explain. I hope you see that Hitlers anti-Semitism is not directed against the Jewish religion nor against each single Jew. No Jewish citizen here is being molested. News to the contrary are lies and nonsense. Such news naturally are being spread by Jews, since the Jews realize very well, as the newspaper "Jewish Chronicle" published in South Afrika recently admitted, that the Jewish fight for world control through the Hitler Revolution in Germany has received a setback of 100 years of strenuous work. The Jewish citizen in Germany shall continue to enjoy a peaceful living as he did before Hitler came with the only exception that he shall enjoy no influence beyond the frame of his own population percentage. In the interest of the German race I do not hesitate to call such attitude, as queer as it might seem to you, a "democratic persecution" and I regard it as very sound. The Jewish citizen who does not like such democratic persecution might leave the country and immigrate somewhere else. And when I say immigrate somewhere else you perhaps will realize how harmful it was and still is that the USA for such a long time had kept its doors open especially at times of business prosperity. In America the Jew saw a vast country with tremendous resources and no end of business possibilities. But he had no intention to go out and work. You will find no Jew being busy as farmer. No, such common work is good enough for the children and grandchildren of the Christian pilgrims of German, French and English birth who alone have built up the country which is called the United States. The Jew was doing the business of his own race, namely lending out money and waiting in his armchair for the return. Thus he gradually got hold of this and that business undertaking, thus he gradually got hold of the entire country. There is today no country in the whole world with a more powerful influence of the Jewish element except perhaps England, than the USA. The fact that such a powerful Christian businessman as Henry Fold is flatly denying everything he said in his book against the Jews speaks for itself. The German element among the American population used to have a great influence in the country. And when I recall the name of Steuben do you doubt that such influence was for the benefit of the country? Where are the Steubens of today? Dont tell me there are none. That is not correct. But it is true that in the course of time the German American element has been degraded to the influence of a butcher and grooceryshopowner. Where there are exceptions you will possibly find that the exception is a Jew. The USA was not governed by Washington but by Wall Street. Franklin D. Roosevelt is the first President to challenge this. It remains to be seen if the power he has been given is sufficient for the success. You may be absolutely sure that Washington and Berlin are in perfect accord although this sometimes does not seem so. Washington is not fighting against Hitler, but instead is watching Hitlers experiment with the Jewish problem with very keen interest knowing perfectly well that this experiment might lead the whole world. Watch Ireland, watch the increase of fashism in England, watch the change in France that will come, remember the American Postmaster Generals order forbidding anti-German boycottstamps on the back of envelopes.

October 2nd 1933.

Dear Kenneth: Not until today could I find time to continue this letter, and I must admit that since your last letter arrived which again was full of insulting remarks about Adolf Hitler I feel little inclined to do so. I must state that you have changed greatly. You were much more grown-up when in May 1932 you left us. I dont know whose influence it is and I dont care. I only know that while you were with us you grew accustomed to argue in a serious way seeking effect only through the sincerety of your arguement and not through a strong language. The letter method is used only by children and hysteric women and men. If I wanted to argue with you on the basis of your last letter I indeed could easily come back and picture a great many Americans who have been making an ass of themselves and still are making an ass of themselves, and I could speak much more convincing, since I know America, whereas you in your highhatted ignorance are adopting nothing but what jewish reporters publish and you fall for any line of talk as long as the lies are presented in a somewhat plausible form. You need not boast about not having Nationalsozialism in America. It is quite doubtful if such is an advantage, and the fact that the American Democratic system given to the country by men who justfully can be called great Americans has grown into a system of rotten corruption might bring about American Nationalsozialism quicker than you think. Any system of government stands and falls with its leaders. Are the leaders rotten the system will turn to be rotten too. Such was the case in Germany, and such might be the case in America too. Moreover America some day might be happy to turn to Nationalsozialism instead of turning to Communism. However as long as there are many of young Americans thinking the way you do, namely from one mooving picture to another I see great trouble ahead for the country, trouble which will be fare more serious than the Russian revolution was. When in face of your calling us being hypnotized I answer you that I am a great admirer of Adolf Hitler I am doing so in order to warn you to remain as narrowminded as you now are. You never will hear the truth about presentday Germany, for America at present is a jewish country. Jewish influence is dominating, and sooner or later the American aryans will realize what they shall have to fight for. Nationalsozialism would never come to America from Germany but from the aryan population in America and such will bring about a rebirth of Washingtons United States. Why cry about the poor little children who are called upon to join Hitlers junior leagues, when they themselves are crazy to do so. Little Jobi has joined and he is tickeled to death about it. Why throw out your chest and condemn militarism when there is no country on the face of the earth more militaristic than the United States? Or do you deny that American boys in their small years even are receiving military training? Is such a sign that America intends to go to war? You say: No. Well, I answer you, Germany wont either. A picture of Hindenburg and Hitler published in an American paper was called: A business conference between H. and H., whereas truly it was a picture of the celebration of the battle of Tannenberg. Such shows how much even in matters of minor importance American newspapers are making an ass of themselves. Even if you dont like it, Adolf Hitler is one of the greatest and at the same time one of the most modest men Germany has ever had. Future will show that I am right. Goodbye now, and dont think that I am sore, I am just a little disappointed in you.

Hearty greetings,





Quote:
I don’t see much future for the Americans.... Everything about the behavior of American society reveals that it’s half Judaized, and the other half negrified. How can one expect a State like that to hold together?
- Adolf Hitler



"Be true to the Fuhrer"
 
Old August 2nd, 2008 #4
ohgolly
Senior Member
 
ohgolly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Florida CSA
Posts: 1,904
Default

Without reading the material above (I probably have but I didn't check it) I'd say that Americanism is all about two things: the loss of memory (hence, identity), and not knowing the difference between a nation and a country.
__________________
With Jews, We Lose.
 
Old August 2nd, 2008 #5
Karl Lueger
Senior Member
 
Karl Lueger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Beograd
Posts: 3,186
Default

Exactly. Those "nazis" knew a thing or six about the world..
The inevitable change in ones mind and spirt in obedience to the jew-made
and approved ideas promoted by the JudeoAmerican Empire.
Bigger threat in that its spreading through Europe as well.

"Americanism is not merely a moral-cultural form of degeneration, nor can it be combated by nonpolitical means. It has already been defeated when one digs it up by its roots and sees there plainly the words: "Made in Israel."
__________________
"To survive a war, you gotta become war."

Rambo, John J.
 
Old August 3rd, 2008 #6
Aryan Lord
Senior Member
 
Aryan Lord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,719
Default

Americanism is a vile cancer that is eating away the body of the Aryan Volk in Europe.
Its values are anti-values. It`s `culture` is an anti-culture. It is the vehicle for the spread of `democracy`, capitalism and the nigger lifestyle.
The Americas stand for the racial melting pot and biological chaos.
I defecate on the stars and stripes.
I appeal to all Aryan Americans to rise up against your country and recognise it for the abomination that it is and return to your continent of origin.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:46 PM.
Page generated in 0.29990 seconds.