|
October 13th, 2014 | #61 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
"I'm not taking a position on jews," said the WINO as he denounced the white man for noticing what jews were doing to his people. |
|
October 13th, 2014 | #62 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
|
Reading his response above, I am 100% convinced he's a lying scumbag relying on the intellectual laziness of his readers to get around the Jewish question.
He makes the assertion that a poll of Episcopalians will yield similar opinions on race as one on Jews. True...to an extent. But do you know any anti-racist tolerant cultural Marxist episcopalians that zealously support Apartheid South Africa because it was good for whites, at the same time? So how does Jared Taylor explain "liberals" like Abe Foxman or even BILL MAHER who are essentially a fifth column for Israel and absolutely uncritical spokesmen for the explicitly racial, intolerant, and genocidal ideology of Zionism? Poll after poll show that American Jews, who are known for being "Liberal", mostly are pro-Zionism. The difference between neo-conservative Jews and liberal Jews is that the first one believes Palestinians should simply be exterminated Ghenghis Khan style, while the liberal ones believe they should be given the worst lands under Israeli occupation to form a state to unload all the Arabs living in Israeli borders. With that said, they both agree that Israel is a Jewish state for only those of the Jewish race and their interests. Meanwhile, these same kikes say that whites cannot have that because it's hate. Episcopalians don't do that. Well, some of them have the anti-white pro-Zionist view actually, but that is only more evidence for how powerful Jewish media control is, and the cognitive dissonance it creates in the stupid.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'" ― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona |
October 13th, 2014 | #63 |
Administrator
|
katana Juggernaut3000 • 15 days ago
Regarding Amren not wanting jews being criticized and such comments being deleted, I made a post at my blog on a recent article on Gaza by Brett Stevens at Amren. Of the total number of comments about 30% (of the 702 comments that I was able to catch) have been deleted by the mods in the final Comments Closed version. Two PDFs show what comment gets deleted and what stays. Gaza Everywhere — Amren Deleted Comments http://katana17.wordpress.com/2014/0...eted-comments/ |
October 13th, 2014 | #64 |
Administrator
|
He's essentially a stinkbait jews throw out there for Southern/Midwestern catfish, and they rise to it every time. He ticks every box of what they think a white leader should look and act like. Aw shucksy Jimmy Stewart by way of Princeton. Hat in his hand, why, he jes petitionin' for white folks to get a square deal, he is.
Last edited by Alex Linder; October 14th, 2014 at 01:37 PM. |
October 13th, 2014 | #65 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northwest Montana
Posts: 687
|
I've noticed that one is instantly attacked when making a negative comment about jews in the amren comment sections. The commenter engleman especially.
__________________
Sine Timore |
October 13th, 2014 | #66 |
Administrator
|
|
October 13th, 2014 | #67 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
The guy simply won't admit his real purpose and motivation. But anyone who knows what's up can infer it. |
|
October 13th, 2014 | #68 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia, CSA
Posts: 11,145
|
An excellent point-by-jewshit-point demolition of Taylor by Tribal Theocrat. Thurston Howell-Taylor's a William F. Buckley for the racially sane: appeals to largely the same upper middle-class, reasonably intelligent but status-fearful crowd.
"Yes: something absolutely must be done about these pestilential negroes - we all agree on that - but we cannot allow ourselves to be dragged down to the level of the white trailer trash, with their 'jew-this, jew-that' ranting! Why, my stockbroker Morrie's a prince of a fellow...."
__________________
"First: Do No Good." - The Hymiecratic Oath "The man who does not exercise the first law of nature—that of self preservation — is not worthy of living and breathing the breath of life." - John Wesley Hardin |
October 13th, 2014 | #69 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia, CSA
Posts: 11,145
|
As the man said about the dead mackerel, Taylor shines & stinks.
__________________
"First: Do No Good." - The Hymiecratic Oath "The man who does not exercise the first law of nature—that of self preservation — is not worthy of living and breathing the breath of life." - John Wesley Hardin |
October 13th, 2014 | #70 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,465
|
Removing poison from your body is not the same as building your identity on hating poison. White identity is not built on hatred of jews. We want the jew poison out, that's all.
By contrast, jew identity is built on hatred of Whites. They define themselves negatively, i.e., on the basis of hating the "other," the non-jew. Every meme jews use -- "racism," "hatred and fear of the other," "imperialism," "sexism," "homophobia," etc. -- is projection (to borrow a jew term). They accuse others of what they themselves are most characterized by. "The jew cries out in pain as he kicks you." Taylor has the chutzpah to ape this dishonesty by implying that jew-crit shows negative identity and jews aren't aggressive. We're straw-manning neutrals, sniffs the Turd. Pay no attention to that man cutting your throat, ignore him and work on yourself or else you're a nigger. This is AmRen's position on the Jewish Question. But suddenly this advice, excreted by the Turd, vanishes on the Black Question. AmRen obsesses about nigger oppression of Whites, whines about black crime, cries about "double-standards." It begs for fairness and justice to be granted. Wait, aren't we supposed to be working on ourselves instead of pointing the finger? It's 99% finger-pointing in Turd town when the topic is niggers. But bring up jews, and the problem becomes You.
__________________
No jews, just right Less talk, more action Last edited by Sean Gruber; October 13th, 2014 at 09:14 PM. Reason: clarity |
October 13th, 2014 | #71 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
|
|
October 14th, 2014 | #72 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,465
|
If niggers are niggers when they blame their problems on Whites, and Whites are niggers when they blame their problems on jews, then aren't Whites niggers when they blame their problems on niggers? Apparently that has never occurred to Dr. Turd.
The Taylor position: Blacks kill Whites = the Negro must be dealt with. Jews loose Negros on Whites = don't scapegoat. Exempt from his accusation of blame-shifting seem to be only the jews, despite their blaming all their troubles on non-jews (2,000 years of poisecution). The solid question is: who-whom? Who really is fucking whom? And the answer is Team Jew is fucking Team White. Can one flush away Team Jew while Turds are occluding the toilet? No, so we need to take plunger in hand and be a happy band of unstoppable unstoppers, tipping the Taylors into the history of sewer.
__________________
No jews, just right Less talk, more action Last edited by Sean Gruber; October 15th, 2014 at 01:56 PM. Reason: reorganized |
October 16th, 2014 | #73 | ||
Administrator
|
Jared Taylor and Fred Reed
Posted on October 17, 2014 by Streicher's Ghost After Jared Taylor was recently attacked in the media by someone with the suspicious name Robert Sussman, Taylor’s friend Fred Reed, who is married to a Mexican woman with Jewish ancestry, wrote a piece defending him on Amren’s website. He defensively goes into some detail about how non-racist Taylor is. I would like to focus your attention on the following passages: Quote:
Quote:
Whatever Taylor and Reed are, they are not White nationalists or anything like it. http://www.destroyzionism.com/2014/1...lor-fred-reed/ |
||
October 16th, 2014 | #75 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,611
|
Freed Reed supports the black legend of the inquisition as well. The inquisition didn't target heretics or Jews, but targeted Jews pretending to be Christians. If a Jew admitted to being a Jew then no problem. But the Jew of course wanted the privileges and political posts meant for Spanish Catholics. So many just pretended to be Christians on the outside, and kept their Judaism secret. All the while those fake Christians attempted to undermine the Catholic faith, which was a direct threat not only to the church but the monarchy of Spain. So these fake Christians had to go. And all the Europeans were noticing that the Jew was a problem at that time, not just Spain.
http://www.catholicleague.org/the-black-legend-the-spanish-inquisition/ Quote:
|
|
October 16th, 2014 | #76 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,803
|
Their jew-mods are in a frothing at the mouth frenzy deleting posts that state the obvious facts: Harvard isn't a college, its a synagogue! More than 25 percent of the students and more than 50 percent of the faculty are jews, to include the last president, the current president who is married to a jew and the provost.
If Robert SUSSMAN is going to call you an anti-semite anyhow, you might as well behave like one. What have you lost in the end? Call him exactly what he is: a dirty, lying jew. Pardon me for the redundancy: Jew. Sussman is a jew speaking his native tongue, lies, about Jared Taylor. From Jared Taylor's banking connections, to his toadying for jews in Japan, to jew authors and moderators at his candy-assed website and speakers at his CON-frences to his utter obsession with blacks and hispanics yet total disregard for war coverage and financial catastrophes that the jews did for their benefit at the expense of Whites, AmRen's purpose seems pretty clear. Let the jews, the disease, cause all the problems, and fixate upon the symptoms. Anyone who points out the root of the illness is a nigger-spic to be shunned. This pussy-boy behavior does NOT lead to page views. Witness Andrew Anglin's hilarious and irreverent Daily Stormer. In a year it surpassed AmRen in page views, despite AmRen existing in one form or another since 1990! People don't want soft, weak bullshit moderated by heebs! They want 200 proof on the rocks! Edit: Anybody who doubts that hundreds of comments get deleted when jews are getting criticized should read that link Alex Linder put up about the AmRen thread about Gaza. There were over 200 deleted comments in that thread alone! http://katana17.wordpress.com/2014/0...eted-comments/ Last edited by Hunter Morrow; October 16th, 2014 at 09:31 PM. |
October 16th, 2014 | #77 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
|
Here is the hilarious Fred Reed article, with commentary:
http://www.amren.com/news/2014/10/ro...taylor-and-me/ Quote:
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'" ― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona Last edited by Joe_Smith; October 17th, 2014 at 05:11 AM. |
|
October 16th, 2014 | #78 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
|
Ladies and Gentlemen, American Renaissance proudly announces our The Sky Is Blue Convention 2014! The list of issues discussed will be:
-Niggers: Are they dumber and more violent than whites? -Immigration: Is transplanting 10's of millions of Mexicans desirable? -Us Dorks and Our Gold-digging Asian Wives: Did you know Asians get good grades in school? -White People: How our white grandchildren are pretty gosh darn adorable.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'" ― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona |
October 16th, 2014 | #79 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
|
Think it's a good idea to allow Jews into a nationalist organization? Jorg Haider thought the same thing:
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%C3%B6rg_Haider
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'" ― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona |
|
October 18th, 2014 | #80 |
Administrator
|
[just for the full texts: first the salon piece, then fred reed on jared taylor]
http://www.salon.com/2014/10/11/amer...ce_foundation/ SATURDAY, OCT 11, 2014 10:00 AM CDT America’s virulent racists: The sick ideas and perverted “science” of the American Renaissance Foundation White supremacy and 15th-century polygenics live on at shockingly ugly American Renaissance foundation conferences ROBERT WALD SUSSMAN Excerpted from "THE MYTH OF RACE" The American Renaissance Foundation is an extremely conservative right-wing organization that also publishes a monthly magazine of the same name, American Renaissance (AR). The magazine’s first issue appeared in November 1990. The foundation was established by Jared Taylor (1952–) who serves as president of the New Century Foundation and as editor of AR. Taylor has ties to a variety of domestic and international racists and extremists. He is on the editorial advisory board of Citizens Informer, the newspaper of the Council of Conservative Citizens, a virulently racist group whose website has referred to blacks as “a retrograde species of humanity.” He has contributed writings to The Occidental Quarterly, a racist journal. He also has been a member of the board of directors of the National Policy Institute, a self-styled racist think tank, and has received funding from this institute. Taylor has close ties with members of various neo-Nazi groups and with Gordon Baum, the CEO of Council of Conservative Citizens. He is a frequent radio guest of Don Black’s, operator of Stormfront, a white supremacist online forum that also advertises American Renaissance conferences. He also has ties to Mark Weber, head of the Institute for Historical Review. European racists are among his close associates, including members of the British National Party, a racist, far-right political party in England, and the National Front, a racist, far-right political party in France. Nick Griffin, the head of the British National Party, has been a speaker at two American Renaissance conferences. Frédéric Legrand, a member of the National Front, is a frequent contributor to American Renaissance. Jared Taylor has written and edited a number of books with racist themes. One of AR’s and Taylor’s favorite and oft-used quotes, recalling fifteenth-century polygenecist thought, is that of zoologist Raymond Hall from an early issue of Mankind Quarterly: “Two subspecies of the same species do not occur in the same geographic area.” Taylor believes that slavery may have been wrong but the alternative was “Negro pandemonium.” He complains that civil rights laws prohibiting racial discrimination have turned “common sense” into a “crime.” In 2005, he wrote in AR: “When blacks are left entirely to their own devices, Western civilization—any kind of civilization—disappears.” He argues that racial diversity is a negative for society and that racial integration has failed. Taylor promotes the main Pioneer Fund themes of a genetic basis for differences in intelligence between the races, the benefits of racial homogeneity, a propensity of African Americans to commit crimes at higher rates than whites, and the need to reverse an alleged reconquest of the American Southwest by Mexicans. Both the American Renaissance Foundation and its magazine are dedicated to the ideal that the United States is a white European nation. Its publications and biennial conferences state that the foundation’s goal is to demonstrate the purported superiority of the white race and the threat nonwhite minorities pose to American society. “The stated purpose of the journal, from the outset, was to create ‘a literate, undeceived journal of race, immigration and the decline of civility.’ It held that ‘for a nation to be a nation—and not just a crowd—it must consist of people that share the same culture, language, history and aspirations’.” To the foundation, race is an essential ingredient for citizenship. “Blacks and Third World immigrants did not really belong in the United States and certainly could not be ‘real’ Americans.” AR’s list of some of its subscribers provides insight into the historical underpinnings and views of the American Renaissance Foundation. Included on its list of “Americans Who Have Advanced White Interests” are Jared Taylor; David Duke; Robert E. Lee; Arthur Jensen; William Shockley; Wilmot Robertson, who viewed Hitler as defender of the white race; Revilo P. Oliver, who argued that Hitler should be recognized as “a semi-divine figure;” William Pierce, founder of the Nazi group National Alliance; George Wallace, past governor of Alabama; Madison Grant; and Theodore Bilbo. In a survey of subscribers, Adolf Hitler ranked first (by a large margin) among “Foreigners Who Have Advanced White Interests.” Hitler also ranked as first among “Foreigners Who Have Damaged White Interests,” probably because his policies were a public relations disaster for the racist and anti-Semitic causes. Among the list of “Americans Who Have Damaged White Interests” is every U.S. president since 1932 except Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan. The first four people on this list are Lyndon Johnson, Franklin Roosevelt, William Clinton, and Abraham Lincoln (the list was compiled before Obama’s presidency). A major debate that has been extensively covered in the pages of AR is the question of what of two strategies whites should follow in order to preserve “racial survival” in the face of the “brown” threat. The first strategy is racial segregation and immigration restriction and, if that is not effective, to enter into negotiations with black and Hispanic nationalists to establish racially based nations within the United States. The second alternative, as articulated by Samuel Francis, a regular contributor to AR, is to exercise the white man’s “instinctual . . . proclivity to expand and conquer” and thus achieve a “reconquest of the United States.” To accomplish this goal, Francis believes that the “phony” rights of nonwhites should be revoked. These include voting, holding office, attending schools with whites, serving on juries, marrying across racial lines, serving in the armed forces, buying homes near whites, and eating at lunch counters with, riding on buses with, holding jobs with, or even associating with “superior” whites. Further, he proposes that we should seal the nation’s borders and impose fertility controls on nonwhites. Francis also points out that the first solution of partitioning nonwhites would pose problems related to the definition of Eastern and southern Europeans, Jews, and even the Irish. For Francis, the statement in the Declaration of Independence that “all men are created equal” was “one of the most dangerous sentences ever written, one of the major blunders of American History.” So we see in the pages of the AR a reflection of the history of polygenics and racism, mirroring ideas that have persisted through the ages, beginning with the Spanish Inquisition, going through colonization, slavery, the eugenics movement, Nazism, and the fight against the civil rights movement. The American Renaissance conferences, which began in 1994, have become a gathering place for white supremacists, white nationalists, white separatists, neo-Nazis, Ku Klux Klan members, Holocaust deniers, and eugenicists. It has become a place where many of the usual Pioneer Fund proponents can voice their vitriolic racial hatred to a mostly friendly audience. The conferences are open to the public and usually attended by 200–300 people. Frequent speakers at the conferences have included Richard Lynn, J. Philippe Rushton, Jared Taylor, and many Pioneer Fund grantees. Many of these amazingly racist lectures can be viewed on YouTube. Many of the papers in AR and lectures at American Renaissance conferences are given by the same old Pioneer Fund people. Here are just a few examples, as pointed out by Tucker. Arthur Jensen in an AR “conversation” stated that the country’s attempt to build a multiracial nation “is doomed to failure.” He also claimed that at least one-quarter of all blacks are “mentally retarded” and “not really educatable.” Glayde Whitney, as a contributing editor of AR, wrote a regular column in which he suggested that different races did not belong in the same species. Lynn wrote in AR that environment has no effect on IQ scores and that differences between blacks and whites are entirely genetic. In a lecture at an AR conference, Rushton said that race differences were nature’s way of allowing people to distinguish friend from foe. Michael Levin declared at a conference that whites dominate mankind in all of the important criteria for evaluating accomplishments in society, and in AR he wrote that the average black is “not as good a person as the average white.” Levin also believed that whites would realize this and once again discriminate against blacks in housing, employment, and schools. Taylor approved of Levin’s predictions and speculated that his inspired vision would lead to “policies strikingly similar to those of the pre-civil rights American South.” At the 2000 AR conference, Taylor was greeted with a burst of applause when he speculated that whites may have lost so much ground in the last century because of Jews. In 2010, the American Renaissance conference was scheduled to be held in Washington, D.C., as usual. However, the conference had to be canceled because of protests by a number of groups over the racist content of the upcoming conference. Late in October 2010, American Renaissance was planning to hold the conference in February 2011 at an undisclosed location in Charlotte, N.C. This was the first time in over a decade that the conference was not held in the Washington, D.C., area, and the first time it was to be held in an “off” year for the biennial conference. After it was discovered that the conference was to be held at the Airport Sheraton and the underlying theme of the conference became known, the hotel canceled the group’s reservations. Other hotels in the area followed suit, also shutting their doors to the conference. Taylor was eventually forced to cancel the event. Instead, he held a session in another hotel where the planned speakers and a few spectators gathered to videotape the speeches. Taylor complained that these cancellations were an obstruction to the right of free speech. However, nobody has to condone the ability or the right of hate groups to gather and incite racial and class hatred. Is it wrong to refuse to allow known terrorist groups to openly meet in public forums and advocate overthrowing our government and its laws? Public hotels are visited by individuals from a wide variety of ethnic groups, and they employ many “nonwhites.” They have the right to protect these people from insult and injury by those who are openly advocating their mistreatment. I would hope that most public venues would not allow a Nazi rally in their facilities. The history of the Pioneer Fund and the American Renaissance Foundation shows that there is little difference between the ideals and goals of these organizations and those of racial hate groups that have caused misery throughout the centuries. Modern science now undermines all of their basic premises, and there is no reason to tolerate their hateful, dangerous, ancient, and outdated assertions. If just one racially motivated hate crime is prevented by depriving attendees of the stimulus these conferences provide for some of its more radical and deranged followers, then we have ample reason to close them down. In January 2011, Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords was shot, six other people were killed, and thirteen were wounded while attending a political rally in Arizona. Giffords is a moderate Democrat who had been narrowly reelected against a right-wing, Tea Party candidate a few months earlier. Giffords also was the first Jewish female to be elected to such a high position in Arizona. Among those killed was Judge John Roll, an ally of Giffords in dealing with the controversial issue of illegal immigration, a very hot topic in Arizona. The shooter was 22-year-old Jared Lee Loughner, a Tucson native. Mein Kampf was among his favorite books, and a Department of Homeland Security memo stated that Mr. Loughner was “possibly linked” to American Renaissance, which was presumably mentioned in some of his Internet postings; he allegedly posted links to American Renaissance.com on his blog and other websites. It appears that federal law enforcement officials pored over versions of a MySpace page that belonged to Loughner and over a YouTube video published just weeks before the shooting under an account linked to him. However, the MySpace page was removed minutes after the gunman was identified by officials. Jared Taylor denied any connection between Loughner and American Renaissance, and no connection was ever proven. However, when a group publishes a journal and holds conferences preaching pro-Nazi, anti-Semitic, xenophobic, and racial hatred and glorifies such hatemongers as Adolf Hitler, Jesse Helms, and David Duke, it should not be at all surprised when some people that are susceptible to this hatred (and love permissive gun laws) become active, racially motivated terrorists. History shows that if you justify, condone, and preach racial hatred, racial discrimination and racist-driven terrorism follows. In February 2012, Stormfront advertised the next American Renaissance conference on its website (along with an ad for the latest David Duke video). Stormfront has been described as the Internet’s first major hate site. The conference, entitled Defending the West, was scheduled to be held in March 2012 at an undisclosed location near Nashville, Tennessee. And indeed, the conference was held on March 16–18 on state property, at the Montgomery Bell Park Inn, which is in a state park. The location had been kept secret in anticipation of protests. Presumably, the event went smoothly; the American Renaissance website says that it took place “with the complete cooperation of the state authorities and without a demonstrator in sight.” Apparently, however, some did protest at the entrance to the park, out of the sight of participants. Welcoming remarks were, as usual, given by Jared Taylor. Among others, Richard Lynn and J. Philippe Rushton were scheduled featured speakers, though it appears that Rushton did not attend. (Rushton died of cancer in early October 2012.) The first speaker before the small audience of 150 was Robert Weissberg, an emeritus professor of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He stated that “racial nationalism is intuitive and written in our genes” and that “even children are conscious of race.” Henry Wolff (2014), an American Renaissance member, summarizes his presentation as follows: [Prof. Weissberg proposed] “A Politically Viable Alternative to White Nationalism” [instead of proposing the complete elimination of nonwhites]. . . . [He] argued that an “80 percent solution” would be one that enforced the “First-World” standards of excellence and hard work that attract and reward whites. He pointed out that there are still many “Whitopias” in America and that there are many ways to keep them white, such as zoning that requires large houses, and a cultural ambiance or classical music and refined demeanor that repels undesirables. This approach to maintaining whiteness has the advantage that people can make a living catering to whites in their enclaves. . . . In answer to questions about the adequacy of his “enclave” solution for poor whites who cannot afford to live in them, Prof. Weissberg expressed the hope that less financially successful whites could draw on their sturdy, warrior heritage to protect their own enclaves. Another speaker, Donald Templer, a retired professor of psychology from Alliant International University, spoke on the “geographical distribution of intelligence.” His presentation repeated age-old eugenics claims that sounded very much like Nazi proclamations. According to Henry Wolff (2014): Professor Templer spoke at length about the dysgenic effects of social policy. He noted that 70 percent of white women on welfare in the United States have IQs of less than 90, and that only 5 percent have IQs over 110. Voluntary, compensated sterilization for welfare recipients would be cost saving, and prevent many burdens on society. Professor Templer pointed out that prison inmates are of below average intelligence, and that permitting conjugal visits is dysgenic in that it allows prisoners to reproduce . . . with the result that society must support genetically disadvantaged children. [Professor Templer stated that] the average IQ in Arab countries is 84, so it is foolish to expect these countries to establish democratic regimes. . . . Prof. Templer wondered whether the flowering of ancient Middle East cultures must have required a higher average intelligence than that of today’s Arabs. Declines could have come about through mixture with African slaves, and the emphasis of Islam on rote memorization may have rewarded plodders rather than creative thinkers. Prof. Templer closed with a call for a recognition of reality rather than the current fetish of egalitarian fantasy. American Renaissance glowingly describes Lynn’s presentation, which evidenced a strong adherence to the ideology of Galton, Gobineau, and Madison Grant: Richard Lynn, the author of many by-now standard works on eugenics, dysgenics, and race differences in intelligence, spoke about the world-wide problem of declining intelligence. He briefly summarized the field of eugenics since Francis Galton coined the term in 1883, noting that the West has now had six generations of dysgenic fertility that has led to a decline in genetic IQ of about one point per generation. . . . Prof. Lynn warned that there is a global dysgenic effect, because the high-IQ peoples of Europe and East Asia have sub-replacement fertility while sub-Saharan Africans have six to eight children. . . . Eugenics is the obvious solution. . . . “We in the West,” as Prof. Lynn argued, “have become too nice.” We do not have the will to stop dysgenic reproduction or dysgenic immigration, which leads Prof. Lynn to predict that “the torch of civilization will pass from the Europeans to the Chinese.” The website goes on: As he always has, since the very first AR conference in 1994, attorney Sam G. Dickson brought the conference to a close. He began with a new retelling of the story of the emperor’s new clothes. Even a child, he noted, can see the foolishness of multi-culturalism and forced mixing of the races. . . . Mr. Dickson closed with a description of what can be the only guarantor of our survival as a people and culture: the ethnostate. . . . Here “the health of the people will be the supreme law,” and if, today, whites are the problem, in our own state whites would be the solution. Only in an ethnostate, he said, can there be true tolerance, because when people are all of one stock, naturally occurring diversity poses no threats and truly can be celebrated. The report of the conference concludes that “with this invigorating benediction we returned to our homes, encouraged and inspired to fight on.” And fifteenth-century polygenics lives on, without any benefit of modern science. Racial bigotry, hatred, and intolerance are alive and well. As I read the proud description of the conference proceedings on the American Renaissance Foundation website, I was struck by how it is so reminiscent of the literature of nineteenth-century proponents of slavery, the early twentieth-century eugenicists, and the proponents of Nazism. The time warp is remarkable; to most rational people, it would be hard to believe, indeed shocking. One could almost read the description of the conference and think it was a joke, a satire. However, it was no joke; it was real. It is laughable, but it is not at all funny. Excerpted from “THE MYTH OF RACE” by Robert Wald Sussman, published by Harvard University Press. Copyright © 2014 by the President and Fellow of Harvard College. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Robert Wald Sussman is Professor of Physical Anthropology at Washington University in St. Louis http://www.fredoneverything.net/Sussman.shtml Robert Sussman, Jared Taylor, and Me A Reckless Disregard of Truth October 16, 2014 Enough is enough. At Salon.com I encounter an article lengthily titled, America’s virulent racists: The sick ideas and perverted “science” of the American Renaissance, and published in book for by Harvard University Press. The burden of the piece is that American Renaissance and its honcho, Jared Taylor, are “Hitlerian,” “anti-Semitic," and hold “extremist views.” These are grave accusations, implying among other things a desire to kill all Jews, Gypsies, Slavs, and so on. I found this interesting. Several years ago I received an email from Jared Taylor, who apparently read my column, Fredoneverything.net, asking me to address AmRen’s annual conference to talk about Mexico and Latin America. I knew little of AmRen at the time except that it was said to be venomously racist. I accepted. I thought it would be interesting to see such a group, and reasoned that telling them the truth as I knew it of Latins could hardly be pernicious no matter who they were. On arriving at the conference site, a hotel near Washington, D.C.’s Dulles Airport, from my home in Guadalajara, I looked for Jared, wondering what he would be like. I knew a little. I had learned that he grew up in Japan, had attended Japanese schools, and thus spoke perfect Japanese. He had also picked up an advanced degree in a French university, and spoke good French. Whatever he was, he wasn’t stupid. He proved to be a courtly man, slim, and in perhaps his late fifties. We chatted briefly, he being busy running the convention. I asked him what topics he wanted me to address. “Anything you like, as long as it’s about Latin America.” That was the limit of his guidance. Given that I live in Mexico, have a Mexican wife, and speak Spanish in the home, he can hardly have expected a denunciation of Latins. I then set out to see what manner of wights the conventioneers might be. I had learned that members of AmRen were opposed to massive immigration from the south, believed blacks and Hispanics to be of lower average intelligence that whites, were alarmed at high rates of crime by blacks and Hispanics, believed that American policies were a failure, opposed compulsory integration, and wanted to preserve white European culture. Why these were described as extremist or ideas of the fringe eluded me. Huge numbers of Americans opposed immigration, large numbers all through society agreed quietly as to the intelligence of blacks, much of the population quite liked white European culture, few thought racial policy a rousing success, and it was obvious from housing patterns that people usually liked living among their own. While one might disagree with any or all of these ideas, they were in the main stream of American thought. They simply were not favored by the dominant elites. I found the attendees to be well-dressed, well-spoken, and well-educated, with name tags affixed to their jackets in the standard manner of conventions. As I remember they ran to middle-aged or older and, though certainly with exceptions, middle class, civil, and leaning toward dweebish. They seemed more worried than hostile. A society they valued was, at least as they saw it, being overrun by alien peoples. The white supremacist label puzzled me. I didn’t know what one was. Was it someone who wanted to rule over non-whites?Or someone who thought whites superior to all other races? Neither fit. It quickly became evident that these people did not want to rule over anyone. They wanted to be left alone. Nor did they seem obsessed with racial superiority. As a group they tended to accept the validity of IQ testing, which in intelligence puts humanity in the order Ashkenazi Jews, North Asians, Caucasians, Hispanics, American blacks, African blacks. While one may question this, it was hard for me to see how people who regarded whites as intellectually inferior to North Asians could quite be called white supremacists. Jared, as I would later learn, had often and on the record expressed his belief in the superiority of North Asians. I gave my address, telling the assembled that not all was darkness south of the Rio Bravo. While I didn’t think unrestricted immigration a good idea, I said, there were nonetheless in Latin America modern countries that successfully operated airlines and telecommunications services, built commercial airliners (Embraer of Brazil) had first-rate thinkers and writers, and so on. I either said or implied—this was years ago—that thesefacts were not consistent with the low intelligence attributed to southern countries. The audience received this civilly, though it was not what they had expected to hear. And that was that. No Nazi salutes, swastikas, KKK banners, exterminationst talk. No mention of Jews at all. Of whom there were a fair few in the group. Whatever the AmRenners were, Brown Shirts they were not. A convention of dentists would have been more exciting. All of this fit poorly with Professor Sussman’s vituperation. The next time I saw Jared was about a month ago, when I was in Washington for a high-school reunion. He invited me and my (again, Mexican) wife, Violeta Gonzalez, to dinner at his home in the Virginia suburbs. We accepted. From the standpoint of the anthropology of extremism, the evening was a failure. His wife and adolescent daughter were gracious and hospitable and spoke sometimes in English, sometimes in French. We talked mostly of linguistics, in which all had an interest, and Jared and I of military history, which he knows particularly from side of the Japanese, whom he admires. One thing he categorically is not is anti-Jewish. I have known a few serious anti-Semites. They are obsessive, constantly launching into the dammed Jews this, and the Jews that, and who do the Jews think they are, etc. Jared does not. This is not surprising. He is a proponent of white European civilization, to which Jews have been major contributors. There you have Jared Taylor and American Renaissance as I have known them. Perhaps they engage in human sacrifice in some secret cave. If so, I am unaware of it. Yet here we have Professor Sussman, who obviously did little research, writing in Salon of AmRen: “when a group publishes a journal and holds conferences preaching pro-Nazi, anti-Semitic, xenophobic, and racial hatred and glorifies such hatemongers as Adolf Hitler, Jesse Helms, and David Duke . . .” How is that again? The archives of American Renaissance are online, and video disks of its conferences are for sale to anyone who wants them. If Professor Sussman will send me a link to a glorification of Hitler by Jared, or to evidence of his pro-Nazism, I will apologize to the professor, and sever relations with Jared. I wait. It is one thing to disagree, however forcefully, with a man’s opinions, as in fact I disagree with some of Jared’s views. It is quite another to engage in fabrication, as if I were to describeMr. Sussman as a homosexual child-molester. His descriptions of Jared are highly defamatory if he cannot back them up, damaging to a man who makes his living as a translator in legal transactions between Japanese and American firms and, to the best of my considerable knowledge, utterly false. Methinks Professor Sussman is simply lying. Otherwise he is just stringing together every hostile epithet he can think of. He displays actual malice toward Jared as distinct from a difference of opinion, and a reckless disregard of truth that should embarrass a cub reporter on a small-town newspaper. If I had submitted the Salon pierce to a desk editor at any of the publications for which I used to write—for example, the Washington Times, Washington Post, Harper’s, Playboy, or Army Times—the editor would have bounced it, and very likely told me to leave and not come back. His first question would have been, “You did talk to Taylor to get his side of this…didn’t you?” He then would have continued, “Your source for this is?...and for this?...and this?...and this?” Newspapers have a keen instinct for self-preservation, and libel suits can be very expensive. Professors might reflect on this. Last edited by Alex Linder; October 18th, 2014 at 03:13 PM. |
Tags |
#1, american renaissance, amren, jared taylor |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|