Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old December 9th, 2014 #41
Joe_Smith
Senior Member
 
Joe_Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
Joe_Smith
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
I don't agree. The christian belief in prayer is the source of the seeming apathy, combined with the smashing of any attempt to counter-organize, resulting in a mentality that you can't fight city hall, so might as well give in and devote your non-tax-slave hours to masturbating to internet porn or watching college football on your big screen.
This is more of a protestant phenomenon than it is a general Christian one. Protestants reject the metaphysical nature of the mystery of christ, as well as the ability for humans to realize it through earthly word or action (the Crusaders believed the opposite and thought battle and self-sacrifice helped them attain this enlightenment) and thus laid a cultural base that makes Protestant societies prone to hyper-individualism, materialism, and apathy, even in their secular variants.

This contributes to why Britain has yet to produce another Richard the Lionheart after converting to Protestantism. Since then, we get self-serving dirtbags like Churchill and Cromwell, who only take action when it reaps immediate material profit even when they know full well what they're doing is wrong. It's also why a disproportionate number of the NSDAP's high command, despite being mostly agnostic, came from Catholic regions like Bavaria and Austria.

Not endorsing Christianity, at this point a primarily Christian based movement are as dumb as an Odinist based one. But differentiating between the different sects is important when approaching the topic.


Quote:
We can't snap people out of it without having control of tv. That's the main source. We can only get people on the internet, and we are. There is a huge proliferation of white media since VNN started in 2000. That is good. But it has yet to turn into an actual white party in the USA, because of the ADL-FBI illegal actions and the media abuse.
The TV and newspaper thing is a generational question that soon will be over with. Young white men simply don't watch TV or read newspapers, and the proliferation of pro-white media online proves this. The biggest issue right now is that throughout the white net, there is a lot of disorganization, disinformation, crackpots, kosher conservativism, and in-fighting, but even this is hitting the tail end of the natural revolutionary cycle and soon unity will rise from the ashes, as we are seeing with the explosive rise of Daily Stormer, that is growing parallel with the decline of destructive FBI trolls like the Christian Identity scene and 14/88r's, as well as the shrinking of the Judeo-Rightism of American Renaissance.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'"
― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona
 
Old December 9th, 2014 #42
Joe_Smith
Senior Member
 
Joe_Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
Joe_Smith
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
Ignorance and illiteracy are better than semiliterancy and propaganda. If people don't want to learn, that's fine. It's not an accident the smartest men America produced came about before public schools existed. The point of public schools is not educate people but to brainwash them to serve the people running the state. Even if that's white, that's still a bad idea.

I completely understand your cynicism, but it's misplaced. Without Jews and handpicked elites trained in the Masonic school of politics, Aryan societies are for the most part transparent and just. Destroying conditions that give power to the man behind the curtain, who has controlled every liberal democracy to this day, leads to a freer society.

Public institutions don't work in multicultural, Jew-run societies, but that doesn't make them inherently bad. The reason whites don't like going to the public pool is because the majority of the people in it are dangerous and unsanitary niggers and Mexicans. Build them a public pool for only whites, and you'll have everyone wanting to go take a swim.

If you think a country that has a large number of illiterates can sustain a modern Western civilization, you're out of your mind. You frame the question as if everyone in your utopian society would have the financial means to pay for private school, but that simply isn't true.



Quote:
I'm will to crush people who don't want to live in a racial state. I'm not willing to become totalitarian by dictating the small stuff, and I will fight any who try to subject me to their vision. So will most of the best white men. I submit to you that you ought to consider that your vision for whites is turning them into ants. Maybe that was the thing for Sparta back then, but it doesn't fit America at all, and America despite what many think was a great success for a long time. I agree on rights blather but still, the state is the worst way to accomplish nearly every objective, and that is not a matter of opinion, that has demonstrated across the board in nearly every land. It's funny how those who argue as you do never look at what's going on and how messed up it is - in Greece as here. All that isn't purely due to the jews, they are responsible for the racial elements, but the problems that come from deficit spending and trying to run a command economy have nothing to do with race. You're missing the entire point of our times today - that the internet makes centralized government redundant. Whites would be far better off if Washington didn't exist. Except for whites who need it to live - Southerners in the military, Massachusetts-style NEA education majors, militarized cops, endless useless bureaucrats at all levels. And no control for the average person. Little control at the state level and no control over the national level.

The first sentence disqualifies everything else you've written. You're willing to use state-power to crush those who seek to fight against your revolution, and thus are an authoritarian yourself. Once you're open to taking that step, all talks of freedom are as hypocritical and abstract as those infantile George W Bush speeches.

Outside of that, if you don't think Jews controlling major institutions (public or private) is far more relevant in explaining corruption than the institutions themselves, then what are you going to do when you take power? Raze all the universities? Burn down the courthouses?

The cognitive dissonance is quite clear. When the private sphere (including gentiles) bribes and agitates for globalization and illegal immigration, because it benefits them financially, the only explanation you give is JEWS. But every fuck up in the public sphere, even when the programs are purposely designed to fail, is an issue with the public sphere itself.


Quote:
It's funny you seem to attribute this to me when I have pointedly mocked rights talk as foolish since there's no vindication. However, the freedoms associated with those are very real things, and they are worth fighting for, and I will fight for them. That's what you don't get. I think you have some ideological dislike of America that is blinding you to her very real strengths.
America was almost as Jewy as Bolshevik Russia from the very beginning. The American revolution, and by extension its principles, was bankrolled by Jews like Haym Solomon who feared the prospect of Britain outlawing slavery in its colonies.

George Washington was extremely close to the Jewish population of America, where Jews-many of them born outside of America-were actually granted amnesties and American citizenship. Read his letters to the Jews of Newport, Rhode Island, which was the Lower East Side of the 18th century, where Washington vows to protect Jewry by any means necessary.

Look up the other ideological founders of America, Ben Franklin et al (said to be an "anti-semite", yet gave money to build a Synagogue ), and you'll see the American revolution was as Jewy as the Bolshevik revolution.

Not saying you can't try and consolidate Aryan interests with the founding ideology of America, if that makes you happy. Just as long as you realize you look as silly as Russia's Nazi Bolsheviks.

America's strengths are in its infinite resources, almost perfect geographical location, and large Aryan population. All of this has been wasted, thanks to the inherent failure and bullshit utopianism of its founding ideology. America would've risen as a historical superpower regardless of the system it employed, communist , capitalist, socialist whatever. Ignoring the independent factors that led to America's rise is , as you accuse others, pure ideology.

Quote:
These strengths will spring back when the government is removed. But again, we do need a racial dictatorship. But it doesn't have to be and should not be totalitarian. It should minimalist beneath a generous-construed racial protection shell. I have every confidence that overpaid, cops, teachers and soldiers can find legitimate work when forced to. It's barely better than ZOG, having a white state run for the benefit of government employees.
You realize the state in your imagination has no practical precedent right?

The rift between government workers and the people is thanks to the fact that the former is at war with the latter. This dichotomy would not exist in a government that actually represents the interest of white people, rather than the interests of Jews trying to exterminate white people.

Quote:
It always comes down to individuals' willingness to fight. Given human nature, which communists deny, there will always be traitors. The only innovation I can think of that might help is the blood lottery for central government employees. Beyond that, decentralization is the best structural protection.
Liberal-tinged people love to make baseless assertions about human nature. People bound to duty and service to the folk, say the liberal, will inevitably become corrupt, while individuals motivated by profit will be benevolent and policed by the "invisible hand". Somehow, because Jewish gangsters have made a mockery of the state and wield it to crush and control host populations, one of the hallmarks of higher civilization should be done away with.

The reality is, people are 50% nature and 50% conditioned, and the people writing the script for the latter 50% are always somebody else, whether you like it or not. The choice is: should the writers be a transparent and honor-bound class checked by Platonic Guardians, or should it be some junk pedaler or industrialist?


Quote:
Au contraire, it has borne them out. The US government is 18 trillion in debt because it abandoned classic liberalism for homosexual Keynes's screw-posterity deficit spending.
America's economic system isn't Keynesian (which I agree has its own flaws), it's socialist in all the wrong places and capitalist in all the wrong places. This failure is a failure by Talmudic design made to enrich the few at the expense of the many.

Quote:
We don't agree on this. The man is important, not just the white part.
Aryans are natural collectivists thanks to the harsh conditions we developed in that required cooperation. This is why we have concepts like the nuclear family, while pre-colonial niggers did not.

Observing whites trying to fight against their instincts and failing under the individualist/libertarian experiment has been as pathetic as two lesbians scissoring. At the end of the day it's against our instincts and nature.

I don't want whites to be ants, but I definitely don't want them to be vermin. I don't know why you dislike other whites so much that you would prefer to engage them in a rat race rather than cooperating with them. Cooperation without the multi-culturalism, Jews, and cultural Marxism is not only incredibly fulfilling, but also yields results greater than a bunch of consumerists fighting over the price of a potato.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'"
― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona
 
Old December 10th, 2014 #43
Joe_Smith
Senior Member
 
Joe_Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
Joe_Smith
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
Chapter 6, "Poland"

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/M...ay-OCS-Ch6.mp3

clocks in just under 1:45. real good stuff on jews dominating foreign press and taking over american press.



[can buy it here: some negative reviews supposedly]
Onward Christian Soldiers: An American Journalist's Dissident Look at World War II: Donald Day: 9780939482627: Amazon.com: Books
Christ, hes vicious on the Poles. Most of the issues regarding minorities within Polish territory was the result of Anglo and French foreign policy.


Never quite understood the hatred for Poles. Ive learned from personal experience that any place that has an appreciable number of Poles, whether its Brooklyn or London, usually has plenty of racially aware and friendly people. Give me 1 Polack over 1000 WASPy richard spencers.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'"
― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona
 
Old December 10th, 2014 #44
Gifu
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 258
Default

Most of the "Poles" I run into are Russians, and Russians are pretty much scum.
 
Old December 10th, 2014 #45
Joe_Smith
Senior Member
 
Joe_Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
Joe_Smith
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gifu View Post
Most of the "Poles" I run into are Russians, and Russians are pretty much scum.
Well Day is talking about the "square heads (Germans) vs the round heads (Poles)", and evokes Von Hindenburg as an example of the former:



But for all intents and purposes, Von Hindenburg is pretty Polish looking, as Prussians can be.

Nothing worse than people attributing racial reasoning to their ideological or chauvinistic hatreds, it undermines the entire science and gives cultural Marxists lots of ammo (IE, "How The Irish Became White" by infamous white-exterminationist kike Noel Ignatiev, which is a staple in most mandatory "race and society" college curriculums). Day didn't like the Poles because he supported Germany, which is fine and I agree with him, but he frames them up unfairly.

Most of those Baltic portions Poland had control over have been part of the Polish-Lithuanian Common wealth since the 15th century. Ukrainians, Latvians, etc were able to live in their communities unbothered by Poles partially ruling them. The rush to assimilate people at gunpoint that Day describes in Poland was because the United States and Britain were giving legs to ethnic tension in Eastern and Southeastern Europe. If you don't assimilate or drive out minorities from your territory in the 1930's, you're going to have a Kosovo situation on your hands. All of these diplomatic challenges were created by the USA (Woodrow Wilson) and the Jews advising him (Baruch, Warburg, etc) for this reason: to keep Europe in perpetual conflict and especially keep Germany distracted to undermine it's natural role as a superpower and lessen it's powerful economic and diplomatic influence in South-Eastern and Baltic Europe. How do I know this? Because when the Germans invaded the Balkans for example, they brokered some treaties (in the Balkans, between Hungary and Romania, etc) that left everyone extremely happy, but were repealed by the allies after the war back to the broken borders which have led to contemporary issues in the region.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'"
― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona

Last edited by Joe_Smith; December 10th, 2014 at 06:13 PM.
 
Old December 10th, 2014 #46
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,283
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Chapter 9: "Jews"

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/M...ay-OCS-Ch9.mp3

(2:14)
 
Old December 10th, 2014 #47
Solskeniskyn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,424
Solskeniskyn
Default

Much appreciated Alex. A couple of chapters in and I'm really enjoying it.

If time, energy and motivation permits, I think I speak for many people when I say that you ought to consider continuing with this Audiobook+commenting-format and add more interesting books to the archives.
 
Old December 10th, 2014 #48
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,283
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Solskeniskyn View Post
Much appreciated Alex. A couple of chapters in and I'm really enjoying it.

If time, energy and motivation permits, I think I speak for many people when I say that you ought to consider continuing with this Audiobook+commenting-format and add more interesting books to the archives.
I will for sure. I'm definitely going to do some E. Michael Jones, probably starting tomorrow. I have time and energy, but 2 hours it he practical limit for talking just wind down a little and have to do other stuff. Also, it's best to stick to industry standard, and only deviate where necessary. That means shows 1-2 hours at most, 1 hour being better. And deviate on the content. I just get overly enthusiastic because this stuff is important and you never hear people talking about it anywhere, really. It's hard to convey to people today what it was like in, say, 1976. We had transistor radios, little bitty ones, as kids. Encyclopedias. A tv with no cable, just a few channels.
 
Old December 10th, 2014 #49
Jimmy Marr
Moderator
 
Jimmy Marr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Jew S. A.
Posts: 3,668
Jimmy Marr
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
Alex's introduction: "This chapter is about jews and is only thirteen pages long, so we should be able to finish it in under an hour"

Hmn... I've only listened to the first minute, but I can see that it clocks in at over two hours. I can only imagine how Alex is going to run this topic into double, sudden death overtime.
 
Old December 10th, 2014 #50
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,283
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

I went ahead and recorded (with commentary) Chapters 1-2 of E. Michael Jones's Living Machines: Bauhaus Archaeology as Sexual Ideology

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/M...ines-Ch1-2.mp3

(1:32)

Living Machines: Bauhaus Architecture as Sexual Ideology: E. Michael Jones: 9780898704648: Amazon.com: Books Living Machines: Bauhaus Architecture as Sexual Ideology: E. Michael Jones: 9780898704648: Amazon.com: Books

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

11 of 12 people found the following review helpful
Rollicking overview of modernist architecture
By Amazon Customer on February 11, 2007
Format: Paperback

This book is very insightful, because it helps us question something that is so often taken for granted: the shape of buildings around us. It is a fast read at only 120 pages, but touches on several big ideas about the influence of architecture on individuals as well as countries and history. My amateur interest in architecture is spurred to further investigation after reading this informative and provocative book.

I'm giving it 5 stars for the readability and "a-ha" spark of realization factor. The book is not without its flaws, as it is clearly based on a series of lectures, so suffers from the typical continuity/context issues that stricter editing could have cured. Originally addressed to people familiar with modern architecural history and Ivy League colleges of the United States, some of the unexplained references earlier in the book are eventually resolved in later chapters. One other criticism is that so much of the book seems to be an "ad hominum" attack on Gropius, even going so far as to psycho-analyze several events in rather symbolic detail.


5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
Architecture as anti-theology
By Jacob on March 8, 2009
Format: Paperback
Bauhaus architecture can be seen in houses that have flat roofs, non load-bearing walls, and are raised above the earth. The nature of Bauhaus architecture is that of modern man: designed to be functional and nothing else. Not only in homes but in apartments as well. Bauhaus represents virtually every condominium, high-rise apartment, and college dorm in the world (is it any wonder that college dorm life is virtually synonymous with sexual orgy?).

Bauhaus architecture was the invention of Walter Gropius after the first world war. The goal of Bauhaus architecture is to design a building where man's ties to the ground and family are severed but at the same time he lives in close proximity with other people while never developing ties to these people (this is necessary for sexual liberation; p. 84). The college dorm gives one enough privacy for sexual escapades but enough proximity to other people to make the act possible. Dorms are simply cubes stacked one upon another. There is no soul there, nor can there be.

Bauhaus architecture is not merely meant to destroy the family, but to propogate an entirely new social order. It was to represent politics by design, or state socialism (107). The anti-Christian nature of Bauhaus is evident in the flat roof: a flat roof by definition is an imposition of ideology upon a reality (e.g., it will leak). But more importantly, a flat roof represents modern man's negation of God, and without God there is no future (102).

The alternative to Bauhaus, which Jones does not develop, is in the rich moral vision given us by Christianity. The Gothic cathedral, the meditarranean villa, and the Byzantium dome all represent a God who is not only truth and goodness, but beauty himself. The solution, Jones notes, is to go back to the fork in the road where we made the wrong turn and fix it (67).


15 of 19 people found the following review helpful
An outstanding third offering. . .
By David Zampino VINE VOICE on November 21, 2002

. . .in E. Michael Jones' frontal assult on modernism!
In "Degenerate Moderns", Jones reveals how much of modern society was brought about by persons whose personal lives (and beliefs) could best be described as deviant. In "Dionysos Rising", he addresses certain trends in music which somewhat less success. In this volume, he takes on Walter Gropius and the Balhaus School of Design. The style is quite different from the previous two books and reads almost like a novel. In the book we learn how Gropius' own beliefs about sex, family, and religion (and his, shall we say, deviancies in these areas of life) influenced his architectural work.
A devastating critique of the International school of architecture in general, and Walter Gropius' work in particular.

Last edited by Alex Linder; December 10th, 2014 at 10:43 PM.
 
Old December 10th, 2014 #51
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,283
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy Marr View Post
Alex's introduction: "This chapter is about jews and is only thirteen pages long, so we should be able to finish it in under an hour"

Hmn... I've only listened to the first minute, but I can see that it clocks in at over two hours. I can only imagine how Alex is going to run this topic into double, sudden death overtime.
Yeah i NEVER learn that lesson. It was the fewest pages of any section yet and longest session.
 
Old December 10th, 2014 #52
Jimmy Marr
Moderator
 
Jimmy Marr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Jew S. A.
Posts: 3,668
Jimmy Marr
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
Yeah i NEVER learn that lesson. It was the fewest pages of any section yet and longest session.
I'm busy today and still haven't been able to listen to it in its entirety, but from what I've heard, it may be your best so far.
 
Old December 10th, 2014 #53
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,283
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy Marr View Post
I'm busy today and still haven't been able to listen to it in its entirety, but from what I've heard, it may be your best so far.
i think it's good, touches on a lot of ground
 
Old December 10th, 2014 #54
Jimmy Marr
Moderator
 
Jimmy Marr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Jew S. A.
Posts: 3,668
Jimmy Marr
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
i think it's good, touches on a lot of ground
I think the anecdotal stuff helps round out your personality and qualify your opinion. Without it you come across as smart as hell and deeply read, but possibly a little light on real world experience. Recounting the early days of your internship in D.C. dispels that presumption.
 
Old December 11th, 2014 #55
Joe_Smith
Senior Member
 
Joe_Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
Joe_Smith
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
I went ahead and recorded (with commentary) Chapters 1-2 of E. Michael Jones's Living Machines: Bauhaus Archaeology as Sexual Ideology

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/M...ines-Ch1-2.mp3

(1:32)
Great book. Jones is easily one the greatest living historians in the world right now, Catholicism and political solutions aside. He's also criminally underrated in the NS/WN scene, but that is partially his own fault.

Speaking of Iran, E Michael Jones (if I'm not mistaken) actually won a literature prize there. A lot of people dismiss Iran, but it's important to know just how much of a turning point their revolution has been in contemporary history.

Unfortunately, you are over the top ideological about the topic, forcing your own beliefs on the reading when it's a stretch at best. The Gropius Haus am Horn, with all its ugliness, is used by libertarians to demonstrate the "success" of capitalism because it utilized then rare materials such as rubber. Most of the products created by the Bauhaus were so expensive only the rich could afford them, and were all the rage with German Jews and bourgeoisie. The cookie cutter structure of the style was created to favor capitalist standardization, and thus they could be mass produced for low cost and high profit (this was Gropius' specific intent, and what he promised Warburg, Hearst, and other Jew and Anglo industrialists he tried to recruit to support his project). By 1933 socialist Nazis closed the Bauhaus for being degenerate soulless Judaic bullshit, and Gropius moved to America.

Jones is critiquing modernity, not socialism. That's the reason why the "International style" became the default in soulless capitalist jew-nests like Chicago and New York, and later expanded throughout the country. Some Bauhaus students were communists and leftists, but Gropius was a businessman. The whole Bauhaus project is a great example of communists and capitalists working together to destroy the world:

Quote:
In late 1932, Mies rented a derelict factory in Berlin to use as the new Bauhaus with his own money. The students and faculty rehabilitated the building, painting the interior white. The school operated for ten months without further interference from the Nazi Party. In 1933, the Gestapo closed down the Berlin school. Mies protested the decision, eventually speaking to the head of the Gestapo, who agreed to allow the school to re-open. However, shortly after receiving a letter permitting the opening of the Bauhaus, Mies and the other faculty agreed to voluntarily shut down the school.[19]

Although neither the Nazi Party nor Hitler himself had a cohesive architectural policy before they came to power in 1933, Nazi writers like Wilhelm Frick and Alfred Rosenberg had already labeled the Bauhaus "un-German" and criticized its modernist styles, deliberately generating public controversy over issues like flat roofs. Increasingly through the early 1930s, they characterized the Bauhaus as a front for communists and social liberals. Indeed, a number of communist students loyal to Meyer moved to the Soviet Union when he was fired in 1930.

Even before the Nazis came to power, political pressure on Bauhaus had increased. The Nazi movement, from nearly the start, denounced the Bauhaus for its "degenerate art", and the Nazi regime was determined to crack down on what it saw as the foreign, probably Jewish influences of "cosmopolitan modernism." Despite Gropius's protestations that as a war veteran and a patriot his work had no subversive political intent, the Berlin Bauhaus was pressured to close in April 1933. Emigrants did succeed, however, in spreading the concepts of the Bauhaus to other countries, including the “New Bauhaus” of Chicago:[20]
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'"
― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona

Last edited by Joe_Smith; December 11th, 2014 at 03:13 AM.
 
Old December 11th, 2014 #56
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 3,860
Robbie Key
Default

The sound volume goes down suddenly after a couple of minutes in Chapter 9, and stays so.
 
Old December 11th, 2014 #57
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,283
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy Marr View Post
I think the anecdotal stuff helps round out your personality and qualify your opinion. Without it you come across as smart as hell and deeply read, but possibly a little light on real world experience. Recounting the early days of your internship in D.C. dispels that presumption.
well i grew up reading books, not dating. my home life was very stable. i just played sports and read books. i didnt date or party or really even have a lot of friends. i do not come from extroverted, gregarious stock, as the irish tend to be. i come from intellectual, sober, private people. so...my world is calm and internal and mental, but it's about external ideas, and playing with verbal forms, it's not about my personality or background, which are pretty typical Flyover German-British farmers-wit-brainz-cum-bourgeois suburban. I'm not interested in me, but this thing on the table under the operating lights in front of us - and i consider it a sad and terrible thing that most writers' only or main subject is themselves (particularly women). I do fear being repetitive, and i'm acutely conscious when i've told anecdotes before, but i repeat them anyway because always new listeners and repetition is part of the job. with me, the thing is context, specific knowlege, lubricated with what i consider humor. i always hated in college that nothing was prepared (ie, study this course and you come away knowing...what? just a bunch of random courses leading to no particular body of knowledge), and all vnn is a reaction to that. at least you walk away from ANYTHING i write or record knowing the fucking context of whatever is being discussed - the biggest one possible. so you see how YOU fit into the picture. random shit just blipping around for no point i cant stand that. believe me, there are millions of things i dont say that i could. writers endlessly turn their families into material, particularly their parents, as wfb did to his father (calling him an anti-semite) and joe sobran said this is particularly despicable. i believe that and that mentality guides anything i might say in relation to relatives or anyone i used to work with. that's just basic ethics, as i see it.
 
Old December 11th, 2014 #58
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,283
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie Key View Post
The sound volume goes down suddenly after a couple of minutes in Chapter 9, and stays so.
yes... i'm not sure what happened there but i noticed the same thing. it is still audible to me, fairly loud even. but i record stuff probably too loud because i cant stand when it's too soft or boderline. it always seems easier to turn it down. so as long as no reverb, i record it very high. but, sorry about that. i dont know what happened other than i paused and took headphones off and the volume nob i must have accidentally rolled down a little. but it should be audible.
 
Old December 11th, 2014 #59
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,283
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe_Smith View Post
Great book. Jones is easily one the greatest living historians in the world right now, Catholicism and political solutions aside. He's also criminally underrated in the NS/WN scene, but that is partially his own fault.
It's no one's fault, he's not a racialist. He's anti-racialist. He doesn't shit over racialists, though, which is nice, since he's subjected to the same jewish persecution. He's a catholic. He takes the catholic line, that race is of ordinary but no special value (i paraphrase). Any higher valuation of race is always described by Jones et al (Johm Zmrack sp?) as worshipping at the altar of your own blood. Always. Catholics have set propaganda frames, just like jews. Like jews in they're handcrafted and ready made - and completely prejudicial. Catholics can't win open arguments, so they employ prejudicial framing, just the way jews do.

Quote:
Speaking of Iran, E Michael Jones (if I'm not mistaken) actually won a literature prize there. A lot of people dismiss Iran, but it's important to know just how much of a turning point their revolution has been in contemporary history.
He wrote a fantastic cover story about his trip to Iran (maybe to receive that award? i dont think so.) and how it is the center of the countersexualrevolution. The jews Frankfurt us, and America spreads that mentality around the world by force, and Iran resists it. I will record that article, but it's already in PDF in this section, I think. J Roberts posted a bunch, I forget which issue, but great reading.

Quote:
Unfortunately, you are over the top ideological about the topic, forcing your own beliefs on the reading when it's a stretch at best. The Gropius Haus am Horn, with all its ugliness, is used by libertarians to demonstrate the "success" of capitalism because it utilized then rare materials such as rubber. Most of the products created by the Bauhaus were so expensive only the rich could afford them, and were all the rage with German Jews and bourgeoisie. The cookie cutter structure of the style was created to favor capitalist standardization, and thus they could be mass produced for low cost and high profit (this was Gropius' specific intent, and what he promised Warburg, Hearst, and other Jew and Anglo industrialists he tried to recruit to support his project). By 1933 socialist Nazis closed the Bauhaus for being degenerate soulless Judaic bullshit, and Gropius moved to America.
I think what I said is exactly right. Wolfe makes the point in his book on bauhaus that these rich guys didnt even want what bauhaus offered, but it was so cool they were buffaloed into going along, only later to replace it, at least internally, with what they really wanted. I don't see how you can possibly deny the anti-functionality of the public housing for niggers (or for Germans) with the soullessness of socialism - the deliberate, fuck-what-real-people-want perversity of it. I think you're close to the leftist mentality that hates that poor whites can actually buy cheapish qualityish goods from Walmart. That's what mass production allowed - the little man to get a piece of something at least somewhat functional and decent. That's nothing to scoff at. Not everyone can be rich, in genes, money or everything else. As long as productive people have enough to get buy on, that others have better doesn't matter. I dont care if rich waste money on ugly art, I care when money is taken from me to buy extra niggers and warehouse them in ugly buildings that make the inhabitants even more violent and dangerous.

Quote:
Jones is critiquing modernity, not socialism.
That's funny. Modernity is socialism. It failed miserably, but it still holds intellectual sway in many quarters. Academia and bureacratic office where horrid art is signed off on.

Quote:
That's the reason why the "International style" became the default in soulless capitalist jew-nests like Chicago and New York, and later expanded throughout the country. Some Bauhaus students were communists and leftists, but Gropius was a businessman. The whole Bauhaus project is a great example of communists and capitalists working together to destroy the world:
Yeah, that's somewhat true, it's not a black and white thing. But where there's force rather than persuasion involved, they always go for the soulless and ugly, you notice. In public housing and art. Public insitutions are almost always ugly, and this is for a reason. They fit the souls of the people who work in them. Look at DC with the supersized public buildings - exactly what Hitler wanted to build. I don't like that, I don't support that, whether it's racial socialism or jewish socialism. It's better to keep things local and low-key. The whole power-eagle mentality just leads to misery and slavery.
 
Old December 11th, 2014 #60
Patrick Bateman
Senior Member
 
Patrick Bateman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,460
Patrick Bateman
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe_Smith View Post
Well Day is talking about the "square heads (Germans) vs the round heads (Poles)", and evokes Von Hindenburg as an example of the former:



But for all intents and purposes, Von Hindenburg is pretty Polish looking, as Prussians can be.

Nothing worse than people attributing racial reasoning to their ideological or chauvinistic hatreds, it undermines the entire science and gives cultural Marxists lots of ammo (IE, "How The Irish Became White" by infamous white-exterminationist kike Noel Ignatiev, which is a staple in most mandatory "race and society" college curriculums). Day didn't like the Poles because he supported Germany, which is fine and I agree with him, but he frames them up unfairly.

I actually found his "square head" and "round head" analogy pretty amusing personally. Although a stereotype its actually pretty true (like most stereotypes). I remember growing up with my cousins who are half Slavic and they had noticeably bigger heads than us. Sometimes we laughed about it and even referred to them as "slavic big heads" Of course there was never any question about their whiteness as they were blonde and blue eyed like us but it was obvious they were from a different white tribe to us, just based on the shape of their face and head. My family being of Germanic origin had much more structured jawlines and longer thinner heads. Anyway, yes I agree, the "round heads" were unfairly being categorized by DAY as being a type of inferior human and I felt uncomfortable with that. I personally find Polish girls extremely attractive. Even dated one for a while. She was lovely! Great body as well! Tall, lean and sexy
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:57 PM.
Page generated in 0.17858 seconds.