|
September 18th, 2005 | #1 |
Administrator
|
Anti-Defamation League (ADL)
[only ADL-related material in this thread]
The ADL-at-Large--Working Against the Best Interests of America U.S. Government Documents Reveal that the U.S. Has Long Known about the ADL's Dishonorable Activities by Mark Farrell The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) has long promoted its image as that of a Civil Rights organization who is merely concerned with furthering the best interests of America. Quite to the contrary, however, the ADL has actually been working to destroy the very fabric of this country through its anti-American activities. A couple de-classified documents shown here will help expose this very fact. The ADL's troubling history first began in 1913, when it was formed as an offshoot of B'nai B'rith, which means "Brotherhood of the Chosen" in Hebrew. This B'nai B'rith organization is a Jewish secret society. The reason that B'nai B'rith formed the ADL organization is that the head of its Atlanta-chapter, Leo Frank, was found guilty of murdering a little 12-year-old Christian girl, Mary Phagan; and, many feel, this B'nai B'rith organization wanted to free Frank--for he murdered a non-Jewish girl, which must have been hardly a crime in their eyes for them to work towards this end. Since those days, the ADL has associated with a lot of characters that many find unsavory, such as mob-boss Meyer Lansky, who was said to be funding many of its activities. Of course, with the ADL's help, he could always complain that his pursuit by law enforcement was simply related to him being Jewish, just another simple case of "anti-Semitism" as they'd say, not related to his illicit and illegal activities, as is always the case. The ADL was also at the forefront of getting Marc Rich, who evaded taxes to the tune of billions of dollars, pardoned by Pres. Clinton on his departure from office. Rich's wife is said to have made some financial donations that helped make the entire process possible. Throughout the ADL's troubling history, it has been investigated by many people in the government. The ADL's typical response is to suggest that anyone who dares to look into its activities is simply a Jew-hater and other related comments, designed to stifle any opposition. Senator Jack Tenney commissioned a report detailing the ADL's "Anti-Gentile Activity in the United States," which exposed many of the ADL's tactics and how it worked to censor opinions and thoughts it found unfavorable. Robert Williams, an Army Intelligence officer, commissioned a report that also detailed many of the ADL's questionable acts. Of course, with the ADL's activities, it is fair to say that the ADL itself doesn't help people like Jews. While claiming to promote free speech (the ADL gave pornographer Hugh Heffner its "Torch of Freedom" award), it was also at the forefront in trying to censor Mel Gibson's movie, "The Passion of the Christ." Additionally, the ADL has reportedly been trying to get such places like Barnes & Noble and Amazon.com to censor anything that it finds objectionable. At Barnes & Noble, the ADL even has little fliers that seem to promote such, though few people bother to view them. More recently, the ADL has been trying to promote laws that would imprison anyone who dares to contradict Jewish-held beliefs, such as the left-over WWII propaganda around the supposed "Holocaust." Many Jews have argued in the past, without any facts to substantiate it, that 6 million Jews died at Auschwitz alone. (Actual figures taken from the International Red Cross put the number of Jews who died in all German concentration camps at about 375,000--to which many Jewish groups counter that the Red Cross is merely "anti-Semitic.") The ADL has been successful with its activities in various foreign countries such as Italy, Germany, Canada, Australia and elsewhere; and, after the Jews at the ADL helped to make Thought Crimes a reality, one individual in Canada was recently convicted in court for saying that "maybe only 5.5 million Jews died in WWII, not 6 million." As is often the case, many Christians are offended by the ADL's activities. Notwithstanding the ADL's attempts to censor Gibson's "Passion of the Christ," the ADL has also worked to remove the traditional associations of Christmas, removing "Christ" from "Christmas" and making it become simply X-mas. Further, the ADL has often promoted the acceptance of homosexuality in society, which many moral citizens find objectionable. The ADL has also engaged in numerous illegal activities in its past, such as when it illegally obtained information from the San Francisco Police Department about various groups or individuals it didn't like and was monitoring. The ADL has also recently lost a million-dollar lawsuit, as a result of the ADL illegally sharing private information it had obtained from a phone conversation in which it was not a party. Coming from an organization that had long associated with mob boss Meyer Lansky, none of this should be too surprising, however. Throughout all this, those people who are knowledgeable in the U.S. government have been keeping the ADL at arm's length. The ADL has been seemingly working in conjunction with AIPAC, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (which recently had its two former heads indicted for passing Classified information to Israel in a scandal that is shocking Washington-insiders); and there is no doubt that the ADL's covert use of money has a significant impact on elected officials. Many in the FBI--and even the Civil Rights Commission--have long recognized the ADL's activities. An excellent example of this is a letter shown here. Mr. Dore Schary, the National Chairman of the ADL, had once invited J. Edgar Hoover to attend one of its banquets. Hoover responded nicely, as one might expect of someone who is professional. Hoover wrote: "I received your letter of December 19th inviting me to attend the dinner . . . "While I certainly appreciate the kind invitation, a prior commitment already confirmed precludes my attendance. I regret I cannot give you a favorable response but want to extend my best wishes for a successful affair." However, on the letter itself which was kept in the FBI's archives, it demonstrated that the FBI was well aware of Schary's questionable activities. It stated: "NOTE: Mr. Schary is a Hollywood producer who is well known to the Bureau. He has never been investigated but Bufiles [FBI files] reflect that he has been a member of, or sponsor of, contributed to, or was in other ways affiliated with a number of organizations cited as CP [Communist Party] front groups or which have been designated as subversive pursuant to EO 10450." The U.S. Civil Rights Commission has also duly noted how the ADL has twisted facts to make its claims. To say that the ADL exaggerates statements, most likely in an effort to raise funds from its rank-and-file, is probably the understatement of the century. Of course, it must be recognized that while the ADL itself claims to be a Civil Rights group, it does not allow non-Jews to hold prominent positions in its organization. Even in the ADL's reports that it submits to the government, with the hope that those working for it will not realize its not-so-hidden agenda and be impressed with its thinly veiled propaganda, the Civil Rights Commission was still taken aback. Paul Alexander, the Acting General Counsel of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, commented on the ADL Report. In this letter, which is also shown here, he said: "...The ADL Report is rank with epithets and labels that only serve to distort the factual accountings.... "The liberal use of hyperbolic epithets throughout the ADL draft sets a tone that probably precludes correction through simple, adjectival laundering. The alleged inaccuracies and misrepresentations noted by the respondents present very serious problems. . . . It is doubtful the report could survive the normal process of a source-check as there does not appear to be sufficient data to support the allegations." In essence, the ADL Report has been simply recognized as propaganda--nothing more--though people in the government are often much too kind and professional to simply call it that. The letter continues and notes that the "ADL files" probably include "hearsay, unverified interview notes, analyses of incidents based on newspapers, information provided by confidential sources, and so on." The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights felt that if it were to publish a report like the ADL Report, it "could seriously undermine the agency's reputation for fairness and objectivity." There can be little doubt that the ADL is working in its own selfish interests to further propaganda that most Americans find deplorable. It is working to promote many activities that people generally find immoral, such as homosexuality and pornography, while simultaneously promoting censorship of things that the ADL finds objectionable, such as Christianity or historical scholarship aimed at left-over WWII propaganda. The ADL has long engaged in illegal activities to this end, and has often associated with people who can be described, at best, as unsavory characters. It has promoted its propaganda at every turn. Help put an end to the ADL's activities. Write to your Congressman and Senators and demand that they investigate its activities. Tell him that you want the ADL's financiers revealed, and are concerned about the ADL's money-trail leading to a foreign country. Tell him that you dislike the ADL's promotion of immoral activities, nor do you want the ADL to be successful in suppressing your First Amendment rights. Tell him you stand firmly against the recent ADL-sponsored bill that would censor Americans from criticizing the ADL's activities. Make a choice: Take a stand now and voice your discontent, or be silenced by the ADL later. http://www.honestmediatoday.com/ADL_at_large.htm |
September 18th, 2005 | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,603
|
More excellent background into the Anti-Defamation League of Bad Breath:
--- AMERICAN DISSIDENT VOICES Broadcast of March 2, 2002 Jewish Hate, the Media, and the ADL By Dr. William Pierce Hello! Last week I mentioned that a record company I own, Resistance Records, was attacked in an hour-long special TV program on one of Sumner Redstone's music television channels, VH1. Redstone, who was born with the name Murray Rothstein, is one of the most powerful of the Jewish media masters. He owns not only VH1, but also MTV and the CBS network. His MTV specializes in encouraging young Whites to mix with and act like Blacks. He promotes "hip hop" culture and rap music among White kids, persuading White boys to talk Black and wear baggy shorts and backward baseball caps -- and persuading teenaged White girls to have sex with Blacks. He is probably the most destructive and hate-filled of all the Jewish media bosses. The special VH1 program to which I referred was called "Inside Hate Rock." "Hate rock" is what Redstone and his people call the music I produce and distribute. Actually there's nothing hateful at all about my music. Its purpose is to help young White people have a sense of identity and pride and purpose, all things that Redstone and company are trying to take away from them. Redstone's aim -- and the aim of the Jewish media bosses generally, whether they're in Hollywood or on Madison Avenue, is to alienate young White people, to uproot them, destroy their sense of racial identity, confuse them, make them forget their traditions and their history, and persuade them to mix with Blacks and other non-Whites. That's why Redstone promotes rap music so heavily. His ultimate aim is to destroy our people, our race. And because I'm trying to counter that with Resistance Records, he calls me a "hater" and calls the music I produce and distribute "hate rock." Well, in addition to music, Resistance Records also produces and distributes video games. A new game that we've just begun distributing is named Ethnic Cleansing. The kids really love it. It's selling like hotcakes. Not only was our music attacked in the VH1 special I mentioned, but our new video game also was denounced as "hateful." And then one of the most powerful and hateful Jewish pressure groups, the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, also jumped on the bandwagon and began screaming about our new game. "It's violent!" they screamed. "It teaches children to hate!" they screamed. Let me tell you: every video game I've seen is violent. Combat is the most common theme of video games. That was true even back in the days of the first, primitive video games, such as "Donkey Kong" and "Pac Man." Most video games today involve shooting people or hacking people up with swords or other weapons. And I'm talking about games marketed by Sumner Redstone's fellow tribesmen. I'm talking about games produced and distributed by Jewish media companies that make regular donations to the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith. The Anti-Defamation League doesn't scream about those games. Some parents are alarmed by the high level of violence in the video games their children play, but the Anti-Defamation League isn't. Perhaps violent video games aren't good for kids. I don't really know, but they are a fact of life. Many kids spend most of their free time playing video games. The point is that Sumner Redstone and the Anti-Defamation League think our game is "hateful" and "dangerous," but not other video games. Why is that? What's the difference? I'll tell you: our game -- Ethnic Cleansing -- is a game designed to raise the racial consciousness of the White kids who play it. That's why Sumner Redstone and the Anti-Defamation League hate it. That's why they are screaming about it. That's why they're denouncing our game as "dangerous" and complaining about the violence in it, but they aren't complaining about other video games that are at least as violent. A game that has an American GI in the Second World War shooting Germans is OK with Sumner Redstone and the Anti-Defamation League. Likewise for a Civil War game in which Yankees and Rebels slaughter each other. They think that's fine. But our game, which involves urban guerrilla warfare between Whites and non-Whites they call "hateful" and "dangerous." In other words, it's OK for Whites to fight against each other. It's OK for Whites to kill Whites. But it's not OK for Whites to fight against non-Whites. That's taboo. Anyway, our game, Ethnic Cleansing, is designed to break that taboo. Our game is designed to teach White kids to stick up for their own people. It's designed to help White kids shed the racial guilt and self-hatred, the sense of racial inferiority, that Sumner Redstone and the folks in the Anti-Defamation League have worked so hard to instill in them. It's designed to help them think in terms of Whites against non-Whites instead of Whites against other Whites. That's why VH1 and the Anti-Defamation League hate it. But, you know, we shouldn't be surprised about that. VH1 is owned by a Jew. It's a Jewish propaganda channel. The Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith is a Jewish pressure group. Their aim is to destroy White racial consciousness and to break down any feeling of White solidarity. The last thing they want is for Whites to learn to stick up for themselves. So we expect them to hate us and denounce us. They have their agenda, and we have ours. Everyone should understand that, but most people don't. The reason they don't is that all of the mass media, even those few not yet owned by Jews, collaborate to keep the Jewish agenda concealed from the public. The media routinely refer to the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith -- and from here on I'll just call it "the ADL" for short -- they routinely refer to the ADL not as a Jewish pressure group or a Jewish propaganda organization or even as a Jewish lobbying group, but as a "human rights organization" or as a "civil rights group." Really. The media want the public to believe that the ADL is an impartial group concerned with what's good for America rather than with what's good for the Jews. In fact, most media won't even tell you that it's a Jewish organization, with strong ties to Israel. So let me tell you a little about the ADL, and you'll understand better why they do what they do. And you'll also see a little more clearly the crookedness of virtually all of the mainstream media in America. The ADL was organized in 1913 by a group of rich Jews specifically as a response to a notorious child-rape and murder in Georgia. Leo Frank was a Jew who owned a pencil factory in Atlanta. In 1913 he raped and murdered one of his White female employees, 14-year-old Mary Phagan. He was tried, convicted, and sentenced to death. The governor of Georgia, in response to Jewish lobbying -- and, most believe, in response to a large Jewish bribe -- almost immediately commuted the death sentence. Angry Georgians then seized the Jewish child-rapist and murderer and hanged him. The Frank case was widely reported in Georgia newspapers in great detail and caused much hostile feeling against Jews. The purpose of the ADL was to deal with such matters in the future by attacking and attempting to discredit anyone opposed to Jews or Jewish policies, by generating pro-Jewish propaganda, and by exerting influence on legislators and other public officials in a more discreet manner than the rather clumsy way in which the Georgia governor had been persuaded to commute the death sentence of Leo Frank. After the formation of the state of Israel in 1948 lobbying for military and financial aid for Israel also became a major ADL activity. The ADL still does all of those things today, and in my case the group's principal activity has been attacking me and attempting to discredit me. In fact, the ADL devotes so much of its effort to attempts to discredit anyone who opposes Jewish policies that it is known in some quarters as "the Defamation League." The ADL regularly refers to me as a "terrorist" and claims that I am "linked" not only to various terrorist acts, such as the Oklahoma City bombing, but also to bank robberies, murders, and other acts of criminal violence. For example, my "link" to the Oklahoma City bombing is that Tim McVeigh, whom I didn't even know existed until I saw him on television after he was arrested -- Tim McVeigh is said to have read and been fond of a novel I wrote 27 years ago, The Turner Diaries. The other so-called "links" are even more tenuous. And yet the mainstream media regularly quote the ADL in saying that I am "linked" to terrorist and criminal activity, and they describe the ADL almost as if it were an official source of information. So let me tell you: I have never been involved in any terrorist or criminal activity of any sort. But the ADL has. In November 1992, after confidential police files were stolen from the San Francisco Police Department, an investigation was begun that led eventually to search warrants being issued. On April 8, 1993, both the San Francisco and the Los Angeles offices of the ADL were searched by police teams armed with these warrants, and more than 12,000 stolen confidential police files were recovered. Most of these confidential police files didn't have anything to do with criminal activity but instead contained personal information on individuals collected by the police in connection with driver's license applications, pistol permits, security clearances, and other routine matters. What the individuals in all of these police files had in common is that the ADL considered them "enemies" because they had at one time or another, in some way, opposed some Jewish policy or some Jewish interest. Some of the individuals in the stolen files were legislators or other public officials that the ADL wanted to bring pressure against. Other criminal activity by the ADL in addition to the possession of the stolen police files also came to light in 1993. A San Francisco Police Department inspector, Tom Gerrard, who had been receiving payments by the ADL to steal the files for them, fled to the Philippines to avoid prosecution. And evidence was found during the search of the ADL's San Francisco and Los Angeles offices that the same sort of bribery, corruption of police agencies, and illegal collection of confidential police files was occurring in New York, Washington, Chicago, St. Louis, and Atlanta. Unfortunately, the ADL already had corrupted the judicial system in California to the point that it was able to stifle further law enforcement action, and very shortly thereafter the mass media in California, which initially had given substantial coverage to the case, were persuaded to drop the matter as well. Some of the individuals whose confidential files had been stolen by the ADL were not ready to drop the matter, however, and they filed civil suits against the ADL for invasion of their privacy. With the enormous resources of organized Jewry behind it the ADL fought these lawsuits tenaciously, appealing every adverse decision. Finally, however, after nine years in the courts, the ADL last week paid damages of $178,000 to the last three victims of its illegal spying. I'm sure that you didn't see anything about that in the news last week, because after the initial publicity back in 1993 the mainstream media have ignored the case. They continue to refer with respect to the ADL as a "human rights organization," with never a mention of its criminal activity. And they continue to quote the ADL's hints and suggestions and insinuations that I am somehow "linked" to terrorist and criminal activity. It is, of course, the ADL, not I, who is engaged in criminal activity, but you would never know that if your source of information is the mainstream media. For those listeners who have access to good reference sources, however, find yourself a copy of the Los Angeles Times from April 9, 1993, and read all about it. Actually, the ADL's stealing of police files is the least of its criminal activities. It just happens to be one activity where the group made a slip and got exposed momentarily. Far more serious are the ADL's links to organized crime: to the Jewish master swindler Marc Rich, for example, or to the Jewish gang boss Moe Dalitz. If you were following the news closely in January of last year, when Bill Clinton, just hours before leaving the White House, issued a number of pardons for criminals, an inordinately large percentage of whom were Jews, you will perhaps remember the controversy around his pardon for Marc Rich. Rich is a billionaire international commodities trader. He was indicted on a large number of criminal charges, including wire fraud and money laundering, before fleeing the country to avoid prosecution. He has given huge sums from his ill-gotten loot to Israel and to the ADL. The ADL chairman, Abe Foxman, wrote to Clinton specifically requesting a pardon for Rich -- and of course, Rich got his pardon. Moe Dalitz was the boss of Detroit's all-Jewish "Purple Gang," which got its start smuggling illegal whiskey into the country and then branched out into White slavery, loan-sharking, illegal gambling, and contract murder. After the Second World War Dalitz moved into the casino business in Las Vegas and eventually became the leading gang boss there. And he gave generously to the ADL and other Jewish organizations. He was one of the ADL's biggest donors during the 1970s and early 1980s. The ADL reciprocated by presenting Dalitz with its annual "Torch of Liberty" award at a formal dinner in his honor in Las Vegas in 1985. Dalitz and seven other gangsters were killed in a gang shootout shortly thereafter. What's important is not that the ADL consorts with gangsters and engages in criminal activity. What's important is that the news media conceal that from the public and treat the ADL as a respectable "human rights organization" that can be relied on for accurate information about people like me -- or about anyone the Jews consider an obstacle to their policies. That's bad. That's very bad, and it's dangerous -- and not just because it misinforms the public about people like me. It's dangerous because it allows the ADL to represent itself as an authority. It gives the ADL much more power to corrupt. It was bad enough when Jewish groups had only their money to bribe politicians and judges and law-enforcement officials, as in the days of Leo Frank. But now, with the collusion of the mass media, the ADL is able to wear a false cloak of authority. And the unfortunate fact is that whenever a military or law-enforcement person sees someone wearing a cloak of authority, his tendency is to salute and wait for orders. Most of us have at least a bit of an authoritarian streak in us, and I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing. Military and law-enforcement people, on the average, have a much bigger streak of authoritarianism in their personalities, and that's not necessarily a bad thing either. But when the ADL uses its false cloak of authority to influence America's legislative, judicial, military, and law-enforcement establishments, that's a very bad thing -- and very dangerous for the freedom and even for the survival of our people. And in fact, the ADL is using the false cloak of authority bestowed on it by the mass media to cozy up to and corrupt military and law-enforcement people all across America. The Jewish mass media have prepared the ground by talking so much about "hate crimes" and "hate speech" that they have convinced large segments of the public that any printed material or public statement that is not Politically Correct is "hate." Anything I publish, for example, is automatically labeled as "hate" by the media. If I criticize America's insane immigration policy, the media will call that "hate." If I complain about the government's policy of putting Israel's interests ahead of America's interests in the Middle East, that's "hate" too. I could publish a book on bicycle repair, and the Jewish media would call it "hate." The media have the public sensitized to that word -- and they've done that deliberately. And they have the more simpleminded elements of the public convinced that there's something illegal about publishing or distributing anything the media have labeled as "hate." If, for example, members of my organization, the National Alliance, distribute leaflets calling for a halt to immigration from the Third World -- or even demanding that the government enforce the immigration laws it already has by stopping illegal aliens from coming across our southern border -- the media invariably will use the word "hate" in every other sentence in reporting our distribution. And then some of the simpletons will call the local police or the FBI to report that our leaflets were left on their front porches, believing that a crime has been committed. All of that is bad enough. But then somebody from the local office of the ADL will approach the local police chief and offer the ADL's help as an authority on "hate" and "extremism." "We will explain to you how to recognize 'hate crimes' and 'speech crimes,'" the ADL will say. "We will teach your officers who the haters are, and we will explain why you should keep an eye on them and harass them and arrest them whenever you can." Ordinarily any self-respecting police chief would resent someone like that telling him how to do his job. He would tell the ADL busybody to buzz off -- especially if he knows that the organization offering its advice is a criminal organization. But usually he doesn't know that, because the media have kept that a secret. Usually he thinks that the ADL is an authority, almost with an official status, because the media deliberately have created that impression. And so the ADL is able to worm its way into local law enforcement and exert its destructive influence on the way the law is enforced. In many cases it is able to persuade the police to violate the civil rights of people it doesn't like. For the police to let the ADL tell them how to recognize and treat so-called "haters" is like the police going to the Mafia and seeking advice on how to deal with organized crime. And the ADL does the same thing with our armed forces. It's like having the Pentagon hiring active, practicing al-Quaeda members to teach the military about terrorism and how to recognize a terrorist. It sounds crazy, but we actually have the greasiest of Jews whispering into the ears of police and military officials all over America, telling them how they should do their jobs. We actually have such Jews with ADL connections installed in offices in the Pentagon, in the White House, and in the Justice Department. That's a bad situation. Like many other bad situations in America today it has arisen directly from the Jewish control of the mass media. What can we do about it? Well, you know what I'm doing. I'm building alternative media as fast as I can to counter the Jewish media. I'm happy to have your support for my work. Here's something else you can do. If you know anyone in law enforcement, ask him whether or not his department has been approached by the ADL or has hired the ADL to give training of any sort to the personnel in his department or whether or not any ADL propaganda has been circulating among members of his department. If his department has had any contact at all with the ADL, tell him what you know. Tell him that you are alarmed and outraged that his department is involved with a criminal, anti-American organization that is working to undermine our Bill of Rights and destroy our Constitution. Get him to help you spread this information to other members of his department. Thanks for being with me again today. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books. It is distributed by e-mail each Saturday to subscribers of ADV-list. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= ==> To subscribe send an e-mail message to: [email protected] The subject of the message should be: Subscribe ==> The National Alliance has a strict anti-spamming policy. This information is intended for interested parties only and is not to be indiscriminately distributed via mass e-mailing or newsgroup posting. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= [...] The "new" National Alliance's contact information deleted in order to spare new people from being sucked in by those who have hijacked and corrupted the organization that Dr. Pierce built. |
September 18th, 2005 | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,603
|
And another by Dr. Pierce; this one is from 2000 and was calculated for enlightenment of law enforcement personnel, many who have been thoroughly indoctrinated to hate their own Whiteness in ADL-run "hater crime" seminars:
Corrupting Our Police by Dr. William Pierce There's certainly much more that I could say about this sorry spectacle of a presidential election we've been experiencing than I said last week -- and later we will talk more about the significance of the election -- but today I want to return to a subject about which I've spoken on earlier programs, a subject of great urgency. That subject is the ongoing erosion of our civil liberties and the gradual conversion of the United States into a police state, so that multiculturalism and the New World Order can be rammed down our throats with less danger of our rebelling. Certainly, most of you who listen to my broadcasts already are concerned about the growing intrusion of the government into the lives of all of us and about the proliferation of so-called "hate crime" and "hate speech" laws, which penalize a person for what he thinks or what he says, or even what he reads or what sort of music he listens to, rather than for what he does. I believe that every decent, thinking American is concerned about this tendency, this trend toward less and less freedom in America and more and more enforced conformity. I also believe that very few of those who are concerned understand what is behind this trend and how extraordinarily dangerous it is. That's what I want to talk about with you today. I'll start with a specific example. About ten days ago my office received a telephone call from a woman who identified herself as a Sergeant Schweitzer with the Northern Kentucky University Police Department in Highland Heights, Kentucky. Sergeant Schweitzer asked for me, and when I got on the line she told me that she had an envelope on her desk which had in it what she described as "hate mail." "So why are you calling me about it?" I asked her. "Because the return address on the envelope is yours," she replied. "All right," I said; "tell me what's in the envelope." She began describing the contents of the envelope. It consisted of several pieces of printed material. There were three or four printed sheets, some containing photographs, with information about racial differences between Whites and Blacks: anatomical differences, as seen in different cranial shapes and jaw configurations; intellectual differences, as seen in differing scores on standard IQ tests; and behavioral differences, as seen in crime statistics. And there was a small pamphlet on an investigation of alleged "gas chambers" at the Auschwitz concentration camp, published by the Institute for Historical Review in California. I told the female police sergeant that none of the items she described was published by my organization, the National Alliance, although a member of my organization may have mailed the materials. I asked her about the postmark on the envelope. She said it had been mailed from east Texas and asked me whether or not the National Alliance has members in east Texas. "Yes, we have many members in east Texas," I told her. "Tell me their names," she demanded. "Of course, I won't do that," I replied. "Well then," she threatened, "I'll turn this over to the FBI, and they'll find out who mailed it." I was becoming a little exasperated by her tone, and so I asked her: "Sergeant Schweitzer, from what you have told me so far I don't understand why this mailing you have is a police matter. Do you believe that a law has been broken?" "Oh, yes, a law certainly has been broken," she replied. "You can't send hate material like this through the mail. It's illegal." "All right," I said, "fax me what you have, including the envelope, and I'll get back to you." And I gave her my fax number. A few minutes later the material arrived in my office, pretty much as she had described it, with a cover sheet bearing the official seal of her police department. A quick glance was all it took to see that there was nothing at all illegal about the mailing: no death threat, no extortion attempt, no attempt at fraud, not even a request for money. But I must admit that I was disheartened by this affair, because Police Sergeant Schweitzer of the Northern Kentucky University Police Department really believes that it is illegal to send through the mail information about racial differences or information about the so-called "Holocaust" which is at variance with the version presented by Steven Spielberg and Elie Wiesel. That's not only disheartening; it's also frightening. It's frightening because thousands of other law enforcement people in America share Sergeant Schweitzer's mistaken belief that it is illegal to write or say or mail anything that is not Politically Correct. They know Politically Incorrect material when they see it, and although they cannot cite a specific statute which has been violated, they believe that there must be such a statute. They believe it because that's what they have been taught. And they have been taught that because for the past two decades some of the most powerful Jewish pressure groups in the country -- the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, the Southern Poverty Law Center, the Simon Wiesenthal Center -- have been working day and night to subvert our entire law-enforcement system in America. From the Federal Bureau of Investigation in Washington all the way down to one-horse outfits such as the Northern Kentucky University Police Department in Highland Heights, Kentucky, Jewish organizations have been lobbying, bribing, infiltrating, corrupting, subverting. Here's the way it works: Imagine that you're the chief of police in Highland Heights, Kentucky. One morning the leading politician in your community, the mayor of Highland Heights, shows up at your office, and he has the two wealthiest Jewish businessmen in the county with him -- and Mr. Cohen, a representative from the Louisville, Kentucky, office of the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith. The Jews are dressed in thousand-dollar suits. They are cordial toward you, but they obviously consider themselves to be very important people, and you, being a bit of a politician yourself, are suitably impressed. The agent from the Louisville office of the Anti-Defamation League, Mr. Cohen, explains to you that his organization, the ADL, is a public service organization that works with other police departments all over the country to help them deal with the growing threat of terrorism and "hate crimes." He explains that the ADL has an extensive information-gathering network with many covert agents who collect information on terrorists and "hate criminals" and then share the information with law-enforcement agencies so that they can do a better job of protecting the public and enforcing the law. He is here to offer the services of the ADL to your police department. If you are like most police chiefs, you are flattered and pleased. You don't stop to question the propriety of Mr. Cohen's proposal. You don't waste any time inquiring into what sort of organization the ADL really is. The mayor and the local fat cats have endorsed it, and that's good enough for you. After all, you are a policeman, and if there's one characteristic that most policemen have it is respect for authority. You simply don't question people who are rich and important and have powerful political connections. When people show up in your office in thousand-dollar suits and act important, you genuflect. In the real world there are very few cops like Inspector Harry Callahan -- Dirty Harry -- in the Clint Eastwood movie by that name, who are contemptuous of authority. Most of them are dyed-in-the-wool authoritarians. So Mr. Cohen sets up a schedule for a series of training seminars for the members of your department to be conducted by ADL instructors -- for a reasonable fee, of course. In these seminars your policemen learn that there is a new type of criminal afoot who is much more dangerous, much more a threat to society, than the drug dealer or the rapist or the child molester or the burglar or the armed robber. This new and more dangerous criminal is the "hate criminal," and the helpful ADL instructor will teach all of your policemen how to recognize "hate crimes" and "hate criminals." They will learn that a heterosexual White male who doesn't like Jews or Blacks or Asians or Mexicans or other non-Whites, or who opposes the Clinton government's open-borders immigration policy, or who is against more gun control laws is very likely to be a "hate criminal." If a heterosexual White male says that he thinks there's already too much "diversity" in the country, or expresses his disapproval of homosexual couples or of White women who have Black boyfriends, then he's definitely someone to keep an eye on. And if he distributes any sort of printed material expressing his Politically Incorrect views, then he should be regarded as a potential Oklahoma City bomber. Now, as usual, I'm oversimplifying things a bit. The instructors the ADL and the other Jewish groups send around to brainwash police personnel are sophisticated enough and indirect enough so that it all seems irreproachable to the naïve cops. Are the Jews telling them to ignore the constitutional rights of people with Politically Incorrect views? Oh, my goodness, no! Oh, no, no, no! Certainly not that! The Jews let the cops know that they respect everyone's constitutional rights -- but, of course, the Constitution was never meant to protect "hate criminals." The First Amendment was never meant to protect all forms of speech, just as the Second Amendment is really only about government militias and bestows no individual right to keep and bear arms. Anyway, despite the sophistication, the results are crude enough. Sergeant Schweitzer of the Northern Kentucky University Police Department is a clear example of that. The Jews already have managed to persuade a lot of cops in addition to her that to question any detail of the official "Holocaust" story or to assert that Blacks and Whites are different in any way except skin color is "hate," and that "hate" is illegal, even if they cannot cite a specific statute that is being violated. So, since there actually is no statute being violated, why is it important that Jewish groups have convinced Sgt. Schweitzer and others to the contrary? Since these confused cops can't actually file charges which will stand up in court, what difference does it make? Well, you know, I believe that most people who take that attitude -- what difference does it make? -- would not be so complacent if it were the Mafia cozying up to the police and teaching them how to tell the bad guys from the good guys. Why? Because, as everyone knows, the Mafia is a criminal organization. We don't want criminal organizations infiltrating and corrupting our law-enforcement agencies, for obvious reasons. But the fact is that the ADL also is a criminal organization -- and a far more dangerous one than the Mafia. Throughout its existence the ADL has maintained intimate affiliations with Jewish racketeers and gangsters of every type -- loan sharks, drug dealers, White slavers, contract killers, illegal gambling den operators, smugglers, illegal weapons dealers, you name it -- and the ADL has received substantial amounts of money from these Jewish gangsters. One of the ADL's principal contributors during the 1980s was the notorious Jewish crime boss Moe Dalitz, the "godfather" of Las Vegas. Dalitz gave the ADL so much money from his various criminal operations that in 1985 the ADL gave a tribute banquet for him and presented him with its annual "Torch of Liberty" award for that year. Shortly afterward Dalitz was killed in a shootout with a rival gang that left seven other gangsters dead as well. More recently the ADL had its offices in San Francisco and Los Angeles raided by police with search warrants who found thousands of stolen confidential police files which the ADL had acquired illegally by having its agents inside California law-enforcement agencies. One might think that with a record like the ADL has, law-enforcement agencies would scrupulously avoid any contact with the organization. The unfortunate fact is that most law-enforcement agencies aren't even aware of the ADL's history of criminal affiliations and activities. They aren't aware of these things because the controlled media to a large degree have avoided saying anything about them. Cops tend to be the sort of people who believe what they are told by the mass media, because of the media's aura of authority. Cops are authoritarians. If they see it on TV they believe it; if it's not on TV then it's not real. And the Jewish bosses of the mass media protect Jewish organizations such as the ADL. The media don't talk about the criminal nature of the ADL; instead they always refer to it in glowing terms as a "public service organization" or a "human rights organization," and the cops accept this description without asking questions. Beyond the impropriety of having a criminal organization teaching our policemen who the bad guys and the good guys are is the effect organizations such as the ADL and the Southern Poverty Law Center have on police attitudes and behavior. This is far more serious than a confused female police sergeant wasting her time and her department's money trying to find out who made a perfectly legal mailing of information about racial differences and "Holocaust" exaggerations. Cops instinctively dislike boat-rockers and dissidents. They may be contemptuous of Bill Clinton as a person, but they are not contemptuous of the system of which Clinton is a part. They are naturally hostile toward anyone who questions authority or speaks out against the system. That's why a lot of Black and Jewish so-called "civil rights" demonstrators got thumped with nightsticks or bitten by police dogs or sprayed with fire hoses back in the 1960s. Today's cops have been taught that they aren't permitted to thump Blacks who demonstrate with Jesse Jackson the way they used to thump Blacks who demonstrated with Martin Luther King 35 years ago. It was bad to have thumped King's demonstrators, they are told, but if they want to thump someone today they should thump White "hate criminals." And that's what they do. Dozens of members of my organization, the National Alliance, while engaged in perfectly legal distributions of printed material to the public have been stopped by police and questioned, harassed, intimidated, had their printed material confiscated, even been arrested -- because the police involved had been told by the ADL or some other Jewish organization that the National Alliance is a dangerous terrorist organization and that its members are likely to be "hate criminals." Ten years ago a 22-year-old New Jersey member was arrested for posting a National Alliance sticker which bore the message, "Earth's most endangered species, the White race: help preserve it." That's all the sticker said, but the young man who posted it was arrested and charged with "ethnic terrorism," a felony offense under a "hate crimes" law which the ADL and other Jewish pressure groups had rammed through the New Jersey legislature. Ten years ago the Alliance didn't have the resources it has today. At that time we didn't even have an attorney on our staff, and the local cops were able to terrorize our young member with the threat of a long prison term. Of course, they couldn't send him to prison for posting our sticker, but he didn't know that, and it cost him a $5000 attorney fee to get the charge against him dismissed. Today he is the Coordinator of the National Alliance's Northern New Jersey Local Unit and is stronger and more committed than ever as a result of his experience ten years ago. But our people shouldn't have to go through experiences like that. We should not be harassed and intimidated for exercising our constitutional rights. And it's perfectly clear that the reason we often are harassed is that our law-enforcement agencies have permitted criminal, anti-American organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League, the Simon Wiesenthal Center, and the Southern Poverty Law Center to misinform and brainwash police personnel. By doing so these Jewish groups often are able to persuade policemen to behave as if the sort of laws the Jews are attempting to have enacted already had been enacted. The Jews are able to persuade law-enforcement agencies and all too often the courts as well to behave as if they already had succeeded in abolishing the First and Second Amendments. This cozy relationship between criminal Jewish organizations and law-enforcement agencies, to the point where the Jewish groups have been given quasi-official status, is a growing problem. It's a danger for all freedom-loving White Americans, not just members of the National Alliance. It's a danger we must confront and deal with. If we attempt to ignore it and hope that it will go away, it won't. It will only become worse, because the nature of the Jews is such that nothing is ever enough for them; they always keep reaching, grasping, for more and more and more. Our way of dealing with this problem is not to fight the police. It's not to attack the police for being too authoritarian. In a healthy society, without Jewish corruption, it's not a bad thing for the police to be authoritarian. What we must fight is the ability of the Jews to corrupt our law-enforcement agencies without exposure, without public scrutiny. Since the Jews' own media won't expose them, it's up to us to do it. We don't have the media resources of Time Warner or CBS or the New York Times or the other Jewish media giants, but we do have a growing ability to reach the two per cent of the White population which is capable of seeing what's happening in their world and coming to their own conclusions about it. It doesn't take too many of us shining a spotlight on the Jewish corruption of our law-enforcement agencies for a few of the more astute and far-sighted police chiefs to start backing away from Semitic entanglements. It doesn't take many more of us exposing the nature of the ADL and the Southern Poverty Law Center and their subversion of our policemen for most law-enforcement agencies to change their policies about dealing with these criminal and un-American organizations. And listen! There are many, many Americans besides me and the members of my National Alliance who don't want America to continue becoming a police state. Speak out about these things yourself, and you'll be surprised by how many others will be encouraged to speak out too. |
September 18th, 2005 | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,603
|
The following link gives a lot of facts about the ADL compiled by some otherwise nutty folks who say that George Bush, Dick, Dick Cheney, Colin Powell, CongoLeeza Rice, and Alberto Gonzales, among others, are Jews. Try to overlook the kooky religious pap and overly conspiratorial stuff and hone in on verifiable facts in the 8-part expose of the ADL:
http://www.holywar.org/txt/ADL/adl_intro.htm |
September 19th, 2005 | #5 |
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: in Canuckistan
Posts: 228
|
the dark side of the ADL. video documentary in 8 parts. I couldn't find any transcript though
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=3840 |
September 19th, 2005 | #6 |
We're the Good Guys
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pediatric Burn Unit
Posts: 4,776
|
So, facts are anti-Semitic?
Or is it all about the jews? |
September 19th, 2005 | #7 | |||
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: in Canuckistan
Posts: 228
|
Jeffrey Blankfort (jew) was harassed by the ADL for years because of his anti-Israel views. He made an anti-ADL website which has some interesting articles:
http://www.webshells.com/adlwatch/ Law Enforcement From Across The U.S. Participate In Joint ADL-FBI Conference On Terrorism http://www.webshells.com/adlwatch/news34.htm Quote:
The ADL Spying Case Is Over, But The Struggle Continues By Jeffrey Blankfort, Anne Poirier and Steve Zeltzer http://www.webshells.com/adlwatch/news28.htm Quote:
http://www.jewishsf.com/content/2-0-...playstory.html Quote:
|
|||
September 19th, 2005 | #8 |
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: in Canuckistan
Posts: 228
|
|
September 22nd, 2005 | #9 | |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
Anti-Defamation League (ADL)
I found an interesting article today. It appears to be written by a Jew who was slandered by ADL. If anybody knows more about this story, chime in. However, I want the citizens of Kirksville to know that ADL is not merely "fighting bigotry," by defaming Whites-- it also defames Jews. Odd, isnt it? ADL is not really a civil rights organization fighting hate groups, it is ITSELF A HATE GROUP.
http://www.webshells.com/adlwatch/news31.htm Quote:
|
|
September 22nd, 2005 | #10 | |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
continued, article by Jew libeled by adL
Quote:
|
|
September 22nd, 2005 | #11 | |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
Anti-Defamation League (ADL)
here is an archive of articles about misdeeds by the ADL. I have no idea who maintains this database. See the list of various titles, all linked to outside resources!
http://www.webshells.com/adlwatch/ Quote:
|
|
September 22nd, 2005 | #12 | |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
ADL a poorly rated "charity"
Charitynavigator is an independent rater of charitable organizations.
They rate ADL poorly. You can read about their information on ADL here: http://www.charitynavigator.org/inde...orgid/3302.htm You can read about their methods here. This information should be made available to the citizens of Kirksville so they can make their own conclusions. http://www.charitynavigator.org/inde.../2/cpid/35.htm Quote:
|
|
September 22nd, 2005 | #13 |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
|
September 22nd, 2005 | #14 |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
tools to use against ADL in court
Here are some things victims of the ADL may wish to consider depending on where you live. These are called "privacy torts" and are related ironically enough to "defamation" which includes libel and slander.
Caveat: this is not legal advice. No legal advice is offered at this forum. If you have a legal question, hire a qualified attorney in your own jurisdiction. use this tool to try and find a good lawyer. and remember, in law like other things, you get what you pay for! if you're serious, be ready to pay a skilled attorney to review your case! http://www.lawyers.com/ Remember, Whites have legally enforceable rights too. They might be able to fight off a handful of these suits but what if they started popping up against them like mushrooms!??? Dont say it cant happen! Read on! |
September 22nd, 2005 | #15 | |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
false light invasion of privacy
http://netlaw.samford.edu/Martin/Adv...falselight.htm
Quote:
|
|
September 22nd, 2005 | #16 | |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
Invasion of privacy on internet by "cyberstalkers--" excellent article!
http://www.dba-oracle.com/internet_l...defamation.htm Quote:
|
|
September 22nd, 2005 | #17 | |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
intentional/ negligent interference with business/contractual relationship
"outing" by SPLC or ADL get you fired? Fight back! Sue them for tortious inteference with business and contractual relationships. Be sure and ask for PUNITIVE DAMAGES.
Quote:
|
|
September 22nd, 2005 | #18 | |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
try this out too-- a new tort not yet recognized: "wrongful misrepresentation of character" by "Nathan Stern.: LOL
Quote:
|
|
September 22nd, 2005 | #19 | |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
here's another one that's not well recognized: invasion of privacy
Quote:
|
|
September 22nd, 2005 | #20 |
Alcoholic Racist Hater
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 407
|
Haha, doesn't Abe Foxman get paid over 600k a year? Wow, "fighting hate" (aka, spreading lies) sure is a tough job.
__________________
"It's about time for those of us still capable of thinking tribally to begin doing so." - WLP |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|