|
|
July 8th, 2006 | #1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Aryan Futurism" Blog
Just in case anybody's interested, I came across this website searching yahoo. Good stuff including the history of Aryan Man as well as some delving into metaphysical tradition, Evola, etc., which is worth the read. Also mentions something called "Cardial civilization" which is apparently an alleged 10,000 year old agricultural society from the south of France, indicating Cro-Magnon man in Europe might have independently developed farming without the need for its entry from the near east. I'd read something about this on the jew Michael Bradley's site a while back but never found any confirmation of the claim. Bradley is the jew who wrote "The Iceman Inheritance."
However, this Aryan Futurism site apparently belongs to an admitted homosexual. Here's a sample: "Homosexual sex is of a different order from straight sex; on a mundane level it is never associated with re-production. On a more profound level it dispenses with mundane reality (male/ female). Unlike dualistic sex which is domestic, tame and aims at harmony through the balanced polarities of male and female, homosexual sex multiplies “sameness”, “oneness” and consequently is “wild”, singular, non-dual, more concentrated and therefore more powerful." |
July 8th, 2006 | #2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,719
|
Quote:
It is a great blog and seems to be quite prominent on search engines.
__________________
http://aryan-myth-and-metahistory.blogspot.co.uk/ |
|
July 8th, 2006 | #3 |
Man against Time
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: At the tip of the spiral
Posts: 159
|
__________________
http://www.thephora.net/forum |
July 8th, 2006 | #4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Well, you know, I myself do not consider homosexuality to be an Aryan virtue. It is an abnormality that is way beyond my comprehension. I really do not understand why men want to be intimate with other men. I understand this no more than I understand why White women want to be intimate with a niggar. And even if I understood it, I would not consider either way to be an Aryan virtue. I would still consider it to be some sort of abnormality. Like kind can live with like kind. And if they cannot, they can suffer the consequences. In the meantime, they do not have the right to call themselves Aryan. An Aryan would not live this abnormal life. If one lives this abnormal life, one is not Aryan.
|
July 8th, 2006 | #5 |
Man against Time
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: At the tip of the spiral
Posts: 159
|
I have a higher opinion of a racially aware homosexual than an anti-racist heterosexual, that's for sure.
__________________
http://www.thephora.net/forum |
July 8th, 2006 | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,719
|
Quote:
Are we not then guilty of projecting a Jewish Christian `morality` upon the National Socialist Weltanschauung?
__________________
http://aryan-myth-and-metahistory.blogspot.co.uk/ |
|
July 8th, 2006 | #7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I never really thought about it that way before. I can understand fondness/loyalty between the same sex. I cannot understand sexual acts with the same sex. Quite frankly, I do not understand sex as a prime motivator at all. This does not mean that I expect others to feel the same way. I just have to wonder what is different with a one who prefers sex with the same gender. Such role playing involved, among other things. Good morals did not come from either christianity or judaism. The natural order of things is male with female. This has nothing to do with religion. I am fond of many of my male friends, but sex with them does not enter the equation. And neither does it enter the equation with them. Male penis superiority is not male superiority. Superior intelligence, strength, courage, and honor are the determining factors. Basing ones life on sexual preferences, whether same gender or other is basing life on only one miniscule factor of life. I see homosexuals having the same problems as heterosexuals. The key term here being sexual. Sexual attractions are a "ship in the night" thing. When the thrill is gone, the thrill is gone, and then the one looks to satisfy the sexual thrill with someone new. To me, there is nothing more thrilling than the love I have for my woman and the love she has for me. As far as racially aware homosexuals go, are they Aryan first? If they are more loyal to homosexuality than to the concepts of family/community/honor.....they need to stay with others who feel the same as they do.
|
July 8th, 2006 | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,719
|
Quote:
I agree with most of what you have said but I do not see an individual`s personal preferences as having anything to do with Aryanism as long as race-mixing is not involved. After all where is the arbitrary line to be drawn? Is spanking,fellatio and bondage also incompatable with Aryanism?
__________________
http://aryan-myth-and-metahistory.blogspot.co.uk/ |
|
July 8th, 2006 | #9 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
July 8th, 2006 | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,719
|
Quote:
My struggle is not merely a struggle against the Jew of body but the Jew of mind, the Christian, the petty moralist, the underman.
__________________
http://aryan-myth-and-metahistory.blogspot.co.uk/ |
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|