|
August 7th, 2012 | #241 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,247
|
Quote:
I thought it was more reasonable to conclude that you were influenced by Faye than to make Jared Taylor the root of all evil, since Taylor never expresses any opinion about revisionism whereas Faye is notorious for it. Maybe Taylor picked up the rhetoric about ethnomasochism from Faye. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Anti-Nazi is a codeword for anti-White. www.national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com www.noncounterproductive.blogspot.com www.williamlutherpierce.blogspot.com Last edited by Hadding; August 7th, 2012 at 11:12 PM. |
||||
August 7th, 2012 | #242 | ||||||||||||
Administrator
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Alex Linder; August 7th, 2012 at 05:22 PM. |
||||||||||||
August 7th, 2012 | #243 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,006
|
may or may not involve illegality
I think you need to look up conspiracy and refresh your memory. It's two or more people plotting an ILLEGAL act. No illegality, no conspiracy
con新pir戢搾y/kənˈspirəsē/ Noun: A secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful. The action of plotting or conspiring. Synonyms: plot - cabal - scheme - intrigue - collusion con新pir戢搾y [kuhn-spir-uh-see] Show IPA noun, plural con新pir戢搾ies. 1. the act of conspiring. 2. an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot. 3. a combination of persons for a secret, unlawful, or evil purpose: He joined the conspiracy to overthrow the government. 4. Law . an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act. 5. any concurrence in action; combination in bringing about a given result. con新pir戢搾y (kn-sp褳-s) n. pl. con新pir戢搾ies 1. An agreement to perform together an illegal, wrongful, or subversive act. 2. A group of conspirators. 3. Law An agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime or accomplish a legal purpose through illegal action. 4. A joining or acting together, as if by sinister design: |
August 7th, 2012 | #244 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
Most likely the fifth definition is to accommodate the misuse of the world by people who can't have their feelings hurt by being wrong about anything, as that is the standard practice with dictionaries these days. |
|
August 7th, 2012 | #246 |
Senior Member
|
If Mark Weber was a woman, I'd call him a cunt.
|
August 7th, 2012 | #247 | ||
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 13
|
Quote:
So if Weber is giving Johnson advice about setting up a non-profit, it's likely similar to the advice Mr. Allen gave me. He said that we would have to soften everything, essentially. We couldn't do anything that could be construed as "hate". It would have to be softer, emotion-less, and that's not what Fritz Berg (of nazigassings.com) or I do. So, we decided against having our principles compromised and castrated by the government in order to fund our projects. And look at the results - on a video segment someone else cut out from my documentary. See what the uploader called it? Holohoax Survivors Who Tell The Truth. The people who viewed it (mostly straight men) are interested in logic and the truth, not emotional appeals. They understand that if The Holocaust is the greatest hoax in modern history, used to genocide whites and destroy Western Civilization, there's no reason at all to mourn Jews who died in camps mostly due to the actions of the Allies (as Johnson suggests we do). Our people are sheep. Do sheep mourn dead wolves? Whites do now, but that's because the Jews need to be exposed as wolves in sheep's clothing. Mostly via the Holohoax. There's no reason for whites to mourn the Jews any more than the Japanese civilians of Hiroshoma and Nagasaki. That's about the right amount of mourning this event should have - even the death toll is similar, according to we lie deniers. In fact, Americans don't mourn those Japanese at all, for a variety of reasons. I think if Carolyn, Alex, and Hadding want to bring up Johnson's alleged homosexuality, it absolutely does come into account here. Homosexual brains have been proven to be similar to straight female brains. Therefore, a homosexual man is likely more receptive to emotional appeals, as are women, and Anne Frank's story is so sad that he'd let the Jews have their "Holocaust", because it's really sad that she and many other poor Jews died... There's another thing, Johnson's residual former Christianity. Johnson was a semi-preacher, too? "GOD" killed Anne Frank, not Germans. Typhus, not gas chambers. God made Typhus! Or Satan? "God" didn't stop her death either, but rather than blame the non-existence of God for Anne Frank's death due to disease, it's much easier to blame the krauts for a former Christian preacher. Which is easier for a Christian to accept? That a loving God made Typhus, and let innocent little girls die from infection? Or that the Germans, with their red and black devil colors had a satanic program to exterminate Jews with gas chambers? I think everything I allege has been proven true and more. Since Taylor, Weber, plus guys who marry Asians (some consider this the definition of a race traitor) and types like that are involved in their elite "circle", articles such as Greg's appear through osmosis. Quote:
Greg Johnson's response - fingers-in-ears, la-la-la I-can't-hear-you |
||
August 7th, 2012 | #248 |
Kill The 'Kwa
|
John McGhee
August 6, 2012 at 11:31 pm Mark Weber is a lazy, indolent do nothing scam artist. Revisionist publishing titan Germar Rudolf called Weber a parasite. Willis Carto was about to fire Weber from the Journal of Historical Review (JHR) and the IHR, because he just could not get the JHR published on time and regularly. Weber is a sponger, who waits like a leech for the next death bequest to fund his salary and to pay his child support. Weber spends his day reading news articles, watching You Tube videos and giving his employees two hour lectures. He accomplishes nothing during the day. Mark Weber must resign from the Institute for Historical Review http://robertfaurisson.blogspot.com/...institute.html He is very proud of the amount of donors money he has sent to pay the IHR lawyers bills. Leon Degrelles book Campaign in Russia reprint sits on Webers desk because he is too lazy to proof read the new edition. Interesting thread on the Vanguard News Network Forum on the Weber/Johnson situation. http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=144074 The IHR is a DBA for the Legion for the Survival of Freedom (LSF), which was bought by Willis Carto in the seventies just before he started the IHR. The LSF has a 501c(3) status which the IHR uses. Mark Weber has NEVER written a single book. Weber uses the IHR and its donors to supply him his $49,000 per year salary. He uses the IHR as a sinecure, an employment that offers a salary but has little work. The Board of Directors are stooges and yes men. They have been told time and time again about Webers indolence, nothing was done. Weber is on the IHR Board himself conflict of interest? http://markwebermustgo.blogspot.com/ LSF/IHR 2010 Tax REturns http://nccsdataweb.urban.org/orgs/pr...?popup=1#forms http://thewhitenetwork.com/2012/08/0...k/#comment-819 |
August 7th, 2012 | #249 | |
Kill The 'Kwa
|
Quote:
Taylor is best friends with Mark Weber, Taylor calls Weber at the slowly dying IHR at least twice a week. |
|
August 7th, 2012 | #250 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,964
|
To see Alex Linder ping Jared Taylor as the Jew loving cunt he really is in almost the same breath as he says how much he relies on Hadding Scott's opinion/judgment/integrity (whatever it was) is almost too much to stomach given Hadding's longstanding defense of Taylor and his philosemitic tendencies.
Apart from his Christian missionary parents; I don't think Jared Taylor saw a white man until he was sixteen....and boy does it show! Quote:
|
|
August 7th, 2012 | #251 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
What disturbs me is to see Johnson making arguments that I know from long experience are either created or most prominently promoted by Taylor and AmRen. As for Hadding, we disagree on legal/illegal question. I don't know what he's said about Taylor. I do trust him on fine factual matter related to Covington or WWII. |
|
August 7th, 2012 | #252 | |
Kill The 'Kwa
|
Quote:
Weber got Taylor involved in the "racialist movement" in the first instance. Weber was editor of Dr. Pierce's old National Vanguard magazine. |
|
August 7th, 2012 | #253 | ||||||
Administrator
|
Quote:
V-dont-dare, ho! His initial backing off: 1) 'the' 'holocaust' - Johnson's trimming: concede it exists, treat pillar big lies of 6m and gassing as details, claim we're moving on as new, improved "universal nationalists" - right position: call it blood libel, point out 6m and gas chambers are Big Lies, like already conceded soap and lampshades, bring up real atrocities called Kulakost or Holodomor 2) white race committing suicide or being murdered? - Johnson's trimming: blaming white decline on inherent biological/genetic moral flaws in our race that cause us to feel guilt for no reason - right position: we're being murdered by jews who have thwarted the will of our majority for nearly 100 years through the power they exercise from owning our academy, media and political system I observed Johnson's shift before I ever knew he was going for tax-deductibility, but he writes as though it were the other way around. Once you prostitute your beliefs for money, you just get slipperier and slipperier. I'm starting to wonder what's real in what Johnson says anymore. And what is this argument, even if we got rid of 'holocaust' jews would still try to guilt us with other bits of (false) history. That's like saying, even if we took out the biggest guy in their gang, the betas would still be coming after us. By that logic, why fight them on anything? They've chosen the grounds. They are teaching the Holodrek in every single classroom in the country. How can you not fight that fight? It makes no sense any way you look at it except one: Johnson is making a strategic withdrawal from winnable political positions to try to enhance fundraising. I think that's the wrong decision. We already have all the gelded conservatives we need. What we need are uncompromising radicals. Not another No-Fight Right Foundation. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
We need more principled radicals, Johnson, not tergiversating, vacillating, compromising conservatives. |
||||||
August 7th, 2012 | #254 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 146
|
Well said. That's a great point. I've never seen any person who takes some variation on the "we're doing it to ourselves" position address it.
Quote:
|
|
August 8th, 2012 | #255 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
These guys are all spiritual queers, as well as flesh queers in certain cases. Here is REAL politics while the implicit conservative write one more winning essay: This is Golden Dawn men going after the van with the Paki who brained the Greek girl on the island the other day. ITZ COMING. But not from the No-Fight Right. |
|
August 8th, 2012 | #256 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Unlike what Michael Collins Piper is saying, Andrew Allen left Weber and the IHR because of his indolence and abject laziness. Not anything to do with so called "Mossad" and conspiracy tales as MCP would have you all believe. |
|
August 8th, 2012 | #257 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,247
|
I pointed out the resemblance between Greggy's wheedling and Bugster rhetoric earlier. Now it's official: Greggy is a Bugster-Booster:
The Left lost the Cold War but won the peace through the establishment of intellectual and cultural hegemony. We can beat them the same way, and we don’t have to all be rocket scientists to do it, since anyone of even moderate intelligence can make real progress by simply repeating Bob Whitaker’s talking points. [Greg Johnson, 7 August 2012] I pointed out in my essay "Our Weapon, The Truth" that methods that will work for corrupting and destroying are not altogether well suited for the opposite purpose. You can't clear the air and win idealists for your cause by being sneaky. And as Rockwell said (approximately), How do you think you are going to out-sneak the Jews, the sneakiest people on Earth?
__________________
Anti-Nazi is a codeword for anti-White. www.national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com www.noncounterproductive.blogspot.com www.williamlutherpierce.blogspot.com Last edited by Hadding; August 8th, 2012 at 04:51 PM. |
August 8th, 2012 | #258 | |
The Epitome of Evil
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
|
Quote:
Holocaust revisionism is more a method that tends to lead to a general series of conclusions than a movement as you should know considering the; sometimes wide, differences of opinion between Revisionists themselves.
__________________
Last edited by Karl Radl; August 8th, 2012 at 05:00 PM. |
|
August 8th, 2012 | #259 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,247
|
Here's something that touches on Greggy's complaint that my concern with definitions is "morally obtuse quibbling." This is Joseph Sobran, from his essay, "For Fear of the Jews":
Not long ago the only label more lethal to one's reputation was that of child molester, but, as many men of the cloth are now discovering, there is this difference: a child molester may hope for a second chance.Now, who is perpetuating "flim-flam"? Could it be somebody that tosses around an incendiary term without defining it?
__________________
Anti-Nazi is a codeword for anti-White. www.national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com www.noncounterproductive.blogspot.com www.williamlutherpierce.blogspot.com Last edited by Hadding; August 8th, 2012 at 05:47 PM. |
August 8th, 2012 | #260 |
Administrator
|
It really isn't even worth debating any longer. It's just self-interested gutlessness on Johnson's and MacDonald's part. It's not even truly a political decision, they just don't have the stomach to fight. They're conservatives posing as radicals.
Once you accept the validity of the term 'the' 'holocaust,' you have lost the debate. KM and GJ have never once questioned the validity of the term, only the sanity and character of those who confute it. They're not enemies, but in practice they might as well be. KM is valuable for historical documentation of jewish lobbying; beyond that, his political instincts, uh, suck. Johnson is clever and entertaining, but increasingly given to self-interested double talk, which would be ok, but he combines it with character smears of others. |
Tags |
#1, holocaust fairytales, holocaust mythology, jared taylor, revisionism |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|