|
|
March 8th, 2008 | #1 |
Administrator
|
The Legal Situation in Sweden
[The claim in this post -- that media in Sweden are deliberately censoring reports of Muslim-on-White crime -- is plausible but unconfirmed. The report comes from a neocon shill. That is, the self-styled Irish savant supports the jews who control the media and impose precisely the same hush-crime suppression in the American media he complains of in Sweden. The only difference between suppression here and censorship there is that the jews hate the Muslim mud committing the crime in Sweden while the same jews love and support the nigger/mexican mud-on-White crime in the U.S. As always, apparent contradictions always can be reconciled by knowledge of the jew's agenda. Diversity good, but anti-jew diversity mixed. Not entirely bad, because, after all, the muds are raping and murdering the hated Whites. But not entirely good, because even when they are raping and murdering Whites they still hate jews. You see the dilemma. What's a kosherite to do?
The jew shrieks for diversity, and the borders are opened. In come the Muslims in the tide of flotsam sewage, but that's no good, because Muslims don't like jews. Es isst shver, ein yidl zu seyn. Don't kid yourself about "Swedish" media. Just because it covers Sweden doesn't mean it's Swedish. In fact so-called Swedish media are controlled by the government (rank socialists) and one private family - the Bonniers - jews. Incidentally, this 'dhimmitude,' subjection to the muslims, is precisely what the West is already subjected to - under the jews. What's the word for "dhimittude imposed by jews?" All together now, class: "Conspiracy theory believed only by haters and extremists wearing tinfoil hats!" What about jews whining about dhimmitude? Where are all these papers and tv stations owned by Muslims? We don't see them anywhere outside Arabia, and even there, check twice. Jews whining about Muslim crime being covered up - well, who owns the papers that have spent 40 years covering up black-on-White crime? Jews, of course. So why are they so worried about Muslim-on-White crime? Answer: they aren't. They don't give a damn about it. If Muslims weren't anti-jew, more than other mud invaders, you'd never hear a single word about it. Bad, diversity, bad! Don't you know, silly muslim dog, you're only supposed to attack Whites, you dhimmy dummy?] The Irish Savant carries a shocking post about Swedish journos who agreed that they would not publish anything negative about Mozzies or SBG for FIVE YEARS! That was as long ago as 1985 - so they merely carried on for the next 23 years. We have been wondering why the BBC so studiously ignores the situation in the NSA - I have no doubt they have adopted a similar policy. This begs the question - why? My anonymous correspondent from my previous post has now graciously provided us with a more comprehensive description of what happened, and which largely explains why Sweden occupies such dhimmi status today. Incidentally, the Thought Police seem to see no irony in referring to the self-censoring journalists as 'independent'. His report: For many years Scandinavians have wondered what kept the Swedish press from reporting the Muslim atrocities that take place every day and that threaten to tear the country apart. Now the truth is out: The conspiracy that hid the effects of multi culture from public view: The "Lilla Saltsjöbadavtalet" 1985 as reported by SwedenWatchQuote - On march 21'st 1987 a remarkable conference was held at the Saltsjöbaden (the salt water spa) resort near Stockholm. A set of rules were adopted by the Swedish Journalists Club at their meeting there, rules applies to all journalists working for Swedish media. These rules are commonly referred to as the "Lilla Saltsjöbadavtalet" (The little salt sea spa agreement). The agreement was supposed to be kept a secret, but as has happened with most of the state manipulated reporting on the multi cultural project, the truth has come out. The agreed rules were as follows: "As an independent journalist, you must observe the following recommendations: Report positively, if necessary rename, fellow Swedes of foreign origin. In particular, this must be observed when reporting on activities related to youth, sports and art. When reporting from events involving different cultures, interview and put visual focus on people of foreign descent. For a period of five years, you must systematically and consistently refrain from reporting on negative aspects like crime that can identify any religious or racial affiliation of the involved or can have a negative effect upon a population as a whole." (The language is really as clumsy as that) The five year period has been extended several times and the agreement, with cosmetic and linguistics refinements are in effect up to this day. When asked, the journalists admit that the meeting took place, but they are reluctant to discuss what were actually said during the conference. Sweden created a paradise on earth for all its citizens. And it's throwing it away - for nothing. As numerous earlier posts show, these favoured immigrants view native Swedes, not with gratitude, but with contempt and hatred. http://southafricasucks.blogspot.com...ournalism.html The "Lilla Saltsjöbadavtalet" Scandal - Sweden's path to dhimmitude My anonymous correspondent from my previous post has now graciously provided us with a more comprehensive description of what happened, and which largely explains why Sweden occupies such dhimmi status today. Incidentally, the Thought Police seem to see no irony in referring to the self-censoring journalists as 'independent'. His report: For many years Scandinavians have wondered what kept the Swedish press from reporting the Muslim atrocities that take place every day and that threaten to tear the country apart. Now the truth is out: The conspiracy that hid the effects of multi culture from public view: The "Lilla Saltsjöbadavtalet" 1985 as reported by SwedenWatchQuoteOn march 21'st 1987 a remarkable conference was held at the Saltsjöbaden (the salt water spa) resort near Stockholm. A set of rules were adopted by the Swedish Journalists Club at their meeting there, rules applies to all journalists working for Swedish media. These rules are commonly referred to as the "Lilla Saltsjöbadavtalet" (The little salt sea spa agreement).The agreement was supposed to be kept a secret, but as has happened with most of the state manipulated reporting on the multi cultural project, the truth has come out.The agreed rules were as follows: "As an independent journalist, you must observe the following recommendations:Report positively, if necessary rename, fellow Swedes of foreign origin. In particular, this must be observed when reporting on activities related to youth, sports and art. When reporting from events involving different cultures, interview and put visual focus on people of foreign descent. For a period of five years, you must systematically and consistently refrain from reporting on negative aspects like crime that can identify any religious or racial affiliation of the involved or can have a negative effect upon a population as a whole." (The language is really as clumsy as that) The five year period has been extended several times and the agreement, with cosmetic and linguistics refinements are in effect up to this day.When asked, the journalists admit that the meeting took place, but they are reluctant to discuss what were actually said during the conference. Sweden created a paradise on earth for all its citizens. And it's throwing it away - for nothing. As numerous earlier posts show, these favoured immigrants view native Swedes, not with gratitude, but with contempt and hatred. http://irishsavant.blogspot.com/2008...f-crime-2.html Last edited by Alex Linder; March 8th, 2008 at 11:27 PM. |
September 15th, 2008 | #2 |
Thomsonist-Frenzian
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Svithiod.
Posts: 2,142
|
Many thanks, Alex, for your introduction to this post. It is 100% spot-on.
__________________
Ek trui a matt minn ok megin. DOWZ! ORION! 88! Visit Robert Frenz' FAEM: http://www.jrbooksonline.com/faem/ |
September 15th, 2008 | #3 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,109
|
kikes do not always outsource gangraping
http://http://www.jpost.com/servlet/...ticle/ShowFull
Quote:
|
|
September 16th, 2008 | #4 |
Thomsonist-Frenzian
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Svithiod.
Posts: 2,142
|
Regarding the jewish media family Bonniers: They came to Sweden in the 1820ies from Germany via Denmark.
The familys real name was Hirschel. Bonnier is a French name, which they "borrowed". In Germany they had been chapmans and rag-and-bone-men. But in Sweden they found a better racket: selling books. This and much more can be read (in Swedish) in a book that was published in 1937. The writer Martin Brandt borrows the name "Moses Smith" from August Strindberg. http://www.radioislam.org/historia/bonnier/index.htm
__________________
Ek trui a matt minn ok megin. DOWZ! ORION! 88! Visit Robert Frenz' FAEM: http://www.jrbooksonline.com/faem/ |
September 16th, 2008 | #5 | |
Hath not a Goy eyes?
|
Quote:
They wanted kibbutz, they got kibbutz.
__________________
The Goy cries out in ecstasy as the Jew strikes him. |
|
April 17th, 2014 | #6 |
Administrator
|
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|