Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old August 26th, 2015 #521
Whatheheck
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 818
Default

Well there goes my theory of the natural order of things to come and save the day......for us i meant, because i know our idealism coincides with nature favoring evolution and advancement.

Its all just a simple biological struggle in time and space and everyone involved is alone in this. To think any deeper, you start entertaining the idea of fairytales.

Well now , the riddle of existence is now solved in a few posts, that wasnt so hard.

Thank you.
 
Old August 27th, 2015 #522
Sean Gruber
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,465
Sean Gruber
Default

It used to be that "natural" meant anything you or x needs to do to stay in nature (stay alive). So cutting one's throat would be "unnatural" (one passes into the eternal gas) while cutting one's attacker's w/b natural. But then the fairy tellers took over the term "natural" because apparently their god gene keeps acting up.

"Good" is a better term than "natural" at this point, less religious. What's good for Whites s/b the frame. But of course the Nature boys will sooner or later bring up The Good again, because Gawd keeps popping up in their heads, so we have to keep fighting these obfuscations.

(It keeps getting clearer to me that the religious mind-fuck is for life. If you have kids, keep them out of every religion like you would keep them out of wells.)
__________________
No jews, just right

Less talk, more action

Last edited by Sean Gruber; August 27th, 2015 at 01:06 PM.
 
Old August 27th, 2015 #523
Whatheheck
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 818
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean Gruber View Post
It used to be that "natural" meant anything you or x needs to do to stay in nature (stay alive). So cutting one's throat would be "unnatural" (one passes into the eternal gas) while cutting one's attacker's w/b natural. But then the fairy tellers took over the term "natural" because apparently their god gene keeps acting up.

"Good" is a better term than "natural" at this point, less religious. What's good for Whites s/b the frame. But of course the Nature boys will sooner or later bring up The Good again, because Gawd keeps popping up in their heads, so we have to keep fighting these obfuscations.

(It keeps getting clearer to me that the religious mind-fuck is for life. If you have kids, keep them out of every religion like you would keep them out of wells.)
Spiritualism/religion is universal, even in the deepest darkest parts of africa where negroids haven't been disturbed for thousands of years.

Is this the god gene? I never heard of it.

I always figured since spiritualism seems to be a natural instinct, then there is something more to our existence. In other words, a path. I believe Pierce spoke of this.

Although there could be something to this, since there is no proof, i stick to the same conclusion that we are all alone in this and thats it.

Another theory i had years ago, was spiritualism/religion was brought about (evolutionary psychology) back in the days when man first developed intellect, as a mind cushion to deal with death and the unknown. But considering the broad diversity of races, plus not believing in the out of africa theory, my mind cushion theory is flimsy at best i think.

Last edited by Whatheheck; August 27th, 2015 at 08:24 PM.
 
Old August 29th, 2015 #524
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,454
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

http://news.yahoo.com/iran-premieres...153434350.html

That Muhammad movie is out:

Quote:
Iran premieres big-budget epic film 'Muhammad'

Tehran (AFP) - Iran's most expensive movie, "Muhammad", which chronicles the childhood of the Muslim prophet, opened nationwide, winning praise from early audiences.

Directed by Majid Majidi, the 171-minute, visually stunning film cost around $40 million (36 million euros), partly funded by the state, and took more than seven years to complete.

Majidi says the aim of his work, the first part of a trilogy, is to reclaim the rightful image of Islam, which he said extremists have distorted.

"Unfortunately at this time the impression of Islam is of a radical, fanatical and violent religion, which is not what it's about," he said in Montreal, where "Muhammad" had its international premiere, hours after screening back home.
http://news.yahoo.com/iran-premieres...153434350.html

This was mentioned in one of the E. Michael Jones Culture Wars magazine articles we discussed in a podcast.
 
Old August 29th, 2015 #525
Joe_Smith
Senior Member
 
Joe_Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
Joe_Smith
Default

If the Mohammed movie is true to the Koran, then the later installments will be very anti-Jew. The first one I hear is just about Mohammed's childhood. Jews will make sure this film doesn't get screened outside of Iran. They'll use Mossad-prepped Sunni fundamentalist suicide bombers in Muslim countries, and their power over media and distribution in Western ones, to make sure as few people see Iranian cinema as possible.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'"
― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona

Last edited by Joe_Smith; August 29th, 2015 at 04:24 PM.
 
Old August 29th, 2015 #526
Joe_Smith
Senior Member
 
Joe_Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
Joe_Smith
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
Good ideas, and thanks. Re Mao, it's the cultural revolution and its techniques. These are mentioned by Frank Ellis in stuff I've posted and done audiobooks on. Just wondering if anyone has any bibliography or books in that direction. That is one area I've never studied, but I've seen some very interesting hints. Relations between the milder form we see today in the US - anything related to shaming -- and the hard-core stuff practiced in China, USSR, and Eastern Europe. The stuff in the Anti-Humans, which i think was in Romania, was full-on torture, but also had elements of what I'm talking about.

Shaming. Consciouness raising sessions. Humiliating people, getting them to recant, in public. Scientific word-twisting along the Pravda (noble ideological lie) and Istina - the factual reality. Anything pertaining to any of this AND anything particularly good on the history of liberalism. I will go after the Catholics and the communists specifically, and the punch pullers, career girls, the cuckservatives.
I think looking towards Mao's cultural revolution is nothing really that relevant to Western PC. The Iranians, who were never Marxists or Jews, are still undergoing a more watered down version of it. And believe me you, while quick-thinking and adaptable Germans didn't require one, Anglo-celtic whites will definitely need a cultural revolution to de-Judaize themselves.

America has far more "contradictions" to exploit compared to 1960's China, and Jews cultivate more and more every decade to add to the pile. It's remarkable and there is nothing like it. As someone who has studied the Cultural Revolution, I can tell you that similarities to what is happening in America are very superficial. The CR sought to destroy the Chinese bourgeoisie and elevate the agrarian over him, in America the bourgeoisie are the "Red Guards" of the Jew-system bullying the little people.

I think digging deep into Puritan culture as others have would yield better results. I think it was E. Michael Jones who specifically singled out Anabaptists as "Judaizers", so it would be interesting to see what kind of role this played in the rationalization of Jews as the West's "moral conscience" by Anglo-Saxon elites.

America & Britain are what the Soviet Union was meant to be. The reason the rest of the West is strangled by Jewry is thanks to the power projected around the world by Anglo-Saxon powers. That's why PC is bolstered with hefty fines and jail time in Germany and Latin France.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'"
― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona

Last edited by Joe_Smith; August 29th, 2015 at 09:27 PM.
 
Old August 30th, 2015 #527
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,454
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

[conclusion of Ch. 8 - 8c]

E. Michael Jones, Degenerate Moderns

Ch. 8: Sigmund and Minna and Carl and Sabina: The Birth of Psychoanalysis Out of the Personal Lives of Its Founders

[this is 8c, concluding ch8]

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/M...es-DM-Ch8c.mp3 (2:42)

- jung's attempt to have it both ways as gnosticism. he knew he was part of a tradition, jones says it goes back to simon magus. ... abandoning 'seduction theory' for Oedipal theory - killing moses (the moral law) in order to justify wanting incest. only the non-lustful can see objectively, is the catholic claim. suggestion the church apply this to its wholly subjective view on race - that it doesn't matter. this leads it to what augustine calls 'obduracy' and 'rejecting the known truth.' conforming reality to its own will rather than acknowledging it and living in accord with it.

[will record the last chapter monday, and the epilogue, as DM draws to a conclusion]
 
Old August 31st, 2015 #528
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,454
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

E. Michael Jones, Degenerate Moderns

Ch. 9: Luther's Enduring Legacy

Epilogue

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/M...ilogue-END.mp3 (1:18)

- Luther the first modern man, first modern ideology. abducing nunes, marrying them off. corrupt clergy. doctrine of enslaved will. rejects free will. saved by grace alone, not works. contrary to scripture, says jones. which is ironic in light of sola scriptura. sexual corruption was rampant in german clergy in 1500s, luthern used this against the papacy, then turned around and justified it for his followers. ... intellectually you can subordinate truth to desire or desire to truth. that is the basic transaction. modernity's rise based on our not knowing connection to lives of its proponents. connaturality: children must be taught to live a certain way to apprehend the truth (classical idea).
 
Old September 3rd, 2015 #529
Whatheheck
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 818
Default

Alex, would you ever consider doing "Seige"?

Also, if I'm not mistaken, you didn't finish Ford's International Jew?

Just curious.

Also, have you written anything on Trump? I looked but couldn't find anything. Maybe you can help give some insight.
 
Old September 4th, 2015 #530
LeoFrank
Senior Member
 
LeoFrank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 526
LeoFrank
jewsign

Does anyone know where there is a complete unexpurgated version of The International Jew that can be found online? The audiobook version Alex created is incomplete.

I found this 4 volume version of The International Jew at the Internet Archive, but I do not know if it is in fact unexpurgated:

https://archive.org/details/TheInternationalJew_655


The PDF Version (Please download):

https://ia802707.us.archive.org/16/i...ationalJew.pdf
__________________
Jews have aggressively dominated the false narrative of the Leo Frank Case since 1913, but as of 2013 you can finally learn everything the Jews have tried to censor & suppress at The Leo Frank Research Library: http://www.LeoFrank.org
 
Old September 4th, 2015 #531
Sam Emerson
Diversity = White Genocide
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Doom Fort II
Posts: 2,800
Sam Emerson
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LeoFrank View Post
Does anyone know where there is a complete unexpurgated version of The International Jew that can be found online? The audiobook version Alex created is incomplete.
Complete version
http://www.jrbooksonline.com/Intl_Je...ion/ijtoc_.htm

Reading with commentary
http://carolynyeager.net/intljewstudy
 
Old September 7th, 2015 #532
LeoFrank
Senior Member
 
LeoFrank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 526
LeoFrank
Default

This version from JR Books Online looks like a pretty complete copy:

http://www.jrbooksonline.com/Intl_Je...ion/ijtoc_.htm

but its a huge task to check and see if it is missing anything as compared to the Internet archive version.

The Noontide Press Version:

https://archive.org/details/TheInternationalJew_655
__________________
Jews have aggressively dominated the false narrative of the Leo Frank Case since 1913, but as of 2013 you can finally learn everything the Jews have tried to censor & suppress at The Leo Frank Research Library: http://www.LeoFrank.org
 
Old September 7th, 2015 #533
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,454
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whatheheck View Post
Alex, would you ever consider doing "Seige"?

Also, if I'm not mistaken, you didn't finish Ford's International Jew?

Just curious.

Also, have you written anything on Trump? I looked but couldn't find anything. Maybe you can help give some insight.
yep, in middle of abridged - will probably quit that because i'm going to do the full unexpurgated volume, about 650 pages. what i was doing is one abridged volume.

this week i will be finishing up The Marketing of Evil. next i will be finishing The Feminization of American Culture. After that I will do TIJ. Then I will do more Leo Frank.

Trump: this cycle's Ron Paul. Trump is more egotistical and less principled. The result will be about the same, is my guess. Ron Paul indirectly attacked the pillars of jewish power. Indirectly because he never called them that. He simply was a more principled constitutionalist than anyone else in the public eye. His policies if enacted would severely reduce jewish power, hence the overwhelming fear-hatred-cheating response from the jew-operated Republicans when it became clear he had traction. As I never fail to repeat, and which WN dully have no response to, Paul ALONE supports free association - which the key law allowing whites to defend their communities - short of a successful racial revoluton. This alone makes jews shit themselves from fear. But WN prefer their childish hatred of markets and manager-level individual because too many of them are proles who believe that luck determines outcomes, and white socialism is needed to steal them what they can't earn. (Bebel's "antisemitism is the socialism of fools." Of course, the anti-antisemites dont seem to care so much about the jewish antiwhite socialists at goldman sachs dishing themselves TRILLIONS out of the white-worker's paycheck via bank bailouts. Point is, as i've said 1,000,000,002x, LIBERTARIANISM IS NOT A THREAT TO RACIALISM - CONSERVATISM IS. Rather, WN, especially on a personal level, should read lewrockwell.com, because there is loads of good information there, both comparatively solid history as well as personal advice. These people interact at a high level. They are successful people generally, and I don't mean that purely in the jewy financial way, but in all ways. It's the conservatives where there is nothing to learn, except what is despicable and low and craven.

Paul got WN support, and I have no problem with that. He blew himself up -- from a very strong position -- when he ran from entirely defensible racial words in his own publication. That cowardice destroyed his burgeoning and youth-exciting movement. The Ron Paul campaign was chock full of lessons for the observant. Of course, they only underlined what we already know: that racialism is a winner, not a loser. If Paul had told Jamie Kirchick (the jewfag) to go fuck himself, and repeated what was in his newsletter - he would have, instead of hoisting himself on his own petard, he would have blown up, as the niggers and nigger-copiers say. He would have got BIGGER. US politics might even have become interesting. But he chose the grovel and knuckle under route, and by doing that removed the difference between him and his campaign and a Mike Huckabee. ... Trump makes commonsense points about nationality and favors commonsense ideas like shutting down the border, building a wall. But he is not racist, and he is a full-blown whore for Israel. I understand people getting enthusiastic, but it should be understood, as with Ron Paul, he is not one of us. When you settle for something less than what you want, you show the world what you are. If Pat Buchanan is good enough (him w black running mate, in the ultimate reductio ad absurdam), then who needs us?

Fuck the cucks, we're the Sex Pistols.

"When you got that, you got the attitude." --Damone

Fun fact about Trump, my only semi-personal connection. I knew a guy who wrote his bio or autobio. He was one of few people who treated me with respect from day one, when I went out to DC, though I was lowest on the totem. He was a good ol' boy Virginian, a real Southerner. How about that?

Last edited by Alex Linder; September 7th, 2015 at 06:13 PM.
 
Old September 7th, 2015 #534
Joe_Smith
Senior Member
 
Joe_Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
Joe_Smith
Default

Trump's very different from Ron Paul, he is more akin to a Peron or De Gaulle or Putin or even Hugo Chavez in personality and style, this is why despite saying all the right things about Jews he sets off their alarm bells. It's true he is not a WN, but at this point any person who does not obey the Jew by the letter is a huge upgrade. Right now, Jews have Trump on yellow (significant risk), but if he gets into power that could very quickly go to orange (high risk), and even red (severe risk).

When Trump gets confronted by Jews about 'racists' and 'anti-semites' supporting him, he doesn't necessarily condemn them, he just says "so what?" . That's an important nuance to look at viz a viz Ron Paul "returning" Stormfront money. Trump being self-financed also means potential white-cause money and energy doesn't go to waste, in the likely scenario that he's just lying.

There's more to hope for in Trump than Marine Le Pen, I'm willing to make that assertion. He's mobilizing people and demonstrating that it's ok to attack conservatives as much or more as you would attack the Left. I'm definitely noticing a significant uptick in pro-NS and pro-West views as of late, Jew-taboos being broken (including Jews being outright named by people you'd never imagine would have the balls) and other developments since Trump started running.

Not sure if you would agree Alex, but Trump's socialistic/populist economic platform combined with his anti-immigration views and social conservatism is very appealing to whites right now, including those who typically vote democrat. Most of Ron Paul's views outside of his anti-war and free association stuff (the reason he got so much support) are dead-ends for whites.

Keep your eyes on Trump, the GOP will never recover from him and this is a great thing. And if he takes power, and Congress/SCOTUS/other Jew controlled forces block him, don't be surprised if he calls white people out to the streets against them. Perhaps he won't directly confront the Jew, but he may kick the foundations upon which they terrorize us from underneath them.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'"
― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona
 
Old September 8th, 2015 #535
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,454
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe_Smith View Post
Trump's very different from Ron Paul, he is more akin to a Peron or De Gaulle or Putin or even Hugo Chavez in personality and style, this is why despite saying all the right things about Jews he sets off their alarm bells. It's true he is not a WN, but at this point any person who does not obey the Jew by the letter is a huge upgrade. Right now, Jews have Trump on yellow (significant risk), but if he gets into power that could very quickly go to orange (high risk), and even red (severe risk).

When Trump gets confronted by Jews about 'racists' and 'anti-semites' supporting him, he doesn't necessarily condemn them, he just says "so what?" . That's an important nuance to look at viz a viz Ron Paul "returning" Stormfront money. Trump being self-financed also means potential white-cause money and energy doesn't go to waste, in the likely scenario that he's just lying.

There's more to hope for in Trump than Marine Le Pen, I'm willing to make that assertion. He's mobilizing people and demonstrating that it's ok to attack conservatives as much or more as you would attack the Left. I'm definitely noticing a significant uptick in pro-NS and pro-West views as of late, Jew-taboos being broken (including Jews being outright named by people you'd never imagine would have the balls) and other developments since Trump started running.

Not sure if you would agree Alex, but Trump's socialistic/populist economic platform combined with his anti-immigration views and social conservatism is very appealing to whites right now, including those who typically vote democrat. Most of Ron Paul's views outside of his anti-war and free association stuff (the reason he got so much support) are dead-ends for whites.

Keep your eyes on Trump, the GOP will never recover from him and this is a great thing. And if he takes power, and Congress/SCOTUS/other Jew controlled forces block him, don't be surprised if he calls white people out to the streets against them. Perhaps he won't directly confront the Jew, but he may kick the foundations upon which they terrorize us from underneath them.
Trump is 180-degrees in personality from Ron Paul. He is harder to get to because he uses his own money, certainly true. I do expect him to be destroyed, though, just as Paul was, whether he backs down or not. That's one reason I'm not paying much attention. I disagree on Ron Paul's economics being a dead end. What the lower-half white man needs is sound money from the government. Otherwise he's rowing with a leak in the boat. It is impossible to exaggerate how morally destructive counterfeit money is. It leads to the entitlement mentality, the why be honest? mentality. Further, Trump would sacrifice the working man's son for Israel, whereas Paul would keep him safe. The point is two radically different personalities, each with a degree of departure from the jewline - how will they turn out? The first retracted his views under pressure. How will the second perform? We'll see.
 
Old September 8th, 2015 #536
Joe_Smith
Senior Member
 
Joe_Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
Joe_Smith
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
Trump is 180-degrees in personality from Ron Paul. He is harder to get to because he uses his own money, certainly true. I do expect him to be destroyed, though, just as Paul was, whether he backs down or not. That's one reason I'm not paying much attention. I disagree on Ron Paul's economics being a dead end. What the lower-half white man needs is sound money from the government. Otherwise he's rowing with a leak in the boat. It is impossible to exaggerate how morally destructive counterfeit money is. It leads to the entitlement mentality, the why be honest? mentality. Further, Trump would sacrifice the working man's son for Israel, whereas Paul would keep him safe. The point is two radically different personalities, each with a degree of departure from the jewline - how will they turn out? The first retracted his views under pressure. How will the second perform? We'll see.
Trump's Israel BS is just not convincing, and while I could be dead wrong, I generally have a very good nose for shills. Between applauses from programmed middle aged patriotards about getting tough on Iran and stealing Iraq's oil, he whispers how he will stick to Obama's nuclear deal. Trump's more brilliant than he looks, and unlike genuine frauds like Nigel Farage or Geert Wilders, the guy wants to go down in history as the man who saved America.

Trump's not a mentally retarded Texas rube like Rick Perry, he's a shifty, fast-on-his-feet, born and bred New Yorker. He knows Jews hate what he says and can't use money or shaming to silence him, he knows Jews are the number 1 problem getting in the way of border enforcement, and he thinks pretending to like Jews will soften the blows and boycott. If Trump wasn't as smart as he says he is, he wouldn't have gotten this far either in the Jew pirhana pond that is NY real estate, or in his presidential run with all the media stacked against him.

Trump's got lots of Jews on the inside, but he's slowly purging them. They are trying to sabotage him from within: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics...posts-20150803 Here's another Jew "aide" trying to say outlandish shit in Trump's name to support the media war against him: https://www.thewrap.com/donald-trump...l-expert-says/

P.S., what the lower half of white men need to do is stop wasting precious little time with Jewish created pseudo-sciences about how "sound money" is supposed to look. Sound money is whatever the people in power planning our economy say it is, whether that's paper dollars or your favorite pet rock (gold). That is why Ron Paul's been predicting the imminent collapse of the dollar for decades, and yet, it never comes. White people of most classes and types like medicare, they don't want it to be cut based on some crackpot premise that's just a way to rationalize more money for parasites destroying the country from above.

Russia's bonds have been downgraded to about the same level as Lebanon (junk) post-ukraine coup, and yet, there are still people out there who think the market is some autonomous force that needs "sound money", lol.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'"
― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona

Last edited by Joe_Smith; September 8th, 2015 at 07:53 AM.
 
Old September 8th, 2015 #537
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,454
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe_Smith View Post
Trump's Israel BS is just not convincing, and while I could be dead wrong, I generally have a very good nose for shills. Between applauses from programmed middle aged patriotards about getting tough on Iran and stealing Iraq's oil, he whispers how he will stick to Obama's nuclear deal. Trump's more brilliant than he looks, and unlike genuine frauds like Nigel Farage or Geert Wilders, the guy wants to go down in history as the man who saved America.

Trump's not a mentally retarded Texas rube like Rick Perry, he's a shifty, fast-on-his-feet, born and bred New Yorker. He knows Jews hate what he says and can't use money or shaming to silence him, he knows Jews are the number 1 problem getting in the way of border enforcement, and he thinks pretending to like Jews will soften the blows and boycott. If Trump wasn't as smart as he says he is, he wouldn't have gotten this far either in the Jew pirhana pond that is NY real estate, or in his presidential run with all the media stacked against him.
Maybe. Understand, I don't watch tv for years now, so I'm not following it closely. But moreso because I know the pattern. I just saw one of the smarter heads of the younger generation, on twitter, saying he thinks Trump is going to win. If so, the men who pay out if they're wrong will give you 7.5x whatever you choose to bet on that option. In other words, the people who have the strongest incentive to get their analysis right see Trump as a longshot. And I agree. Just watch. They'll get him.

Look into Trump's background to see if he really is some kind of great businessman. He had connections, both in his family and among jews. It's not all him in a garage creating something. It's him given a starter unit worth seven figures, and going from there.

Quote:
Trump's got lots of Jews on the inside, but he's slowly purging them. They are trying to sabotage him from within:

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics...posts-20150803 Here's another Jew "aide" trying to say outlandish shit in Trump's name to support the media war against him: https://www.thewrap.com/donald-trump...l-expert-says/

P.S., what the lower half of white men need to do is stop wasting precious little time with Jewish created pseudo-sciences about how "sound money" is supposed to look. Sound money is whatever the people in power planning our economy say it is,
That's right - but that isn't the market, that's the government. And that's the problem. The market alone can drive out bad money. But we don't have one, thanks to socialists, and not all of them jews.
 
Old September 8th, 2015 #538
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,454
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Next chapter of Kupelian book will be up Wed before noon.
 
Old September 8th, 2015 #539
Sam Emerson
Diversity = White Genocide
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Doom Fort II
Posts: 2,800
Sam Emerson
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
Maybe. Understand, I don't watch tv for years now, so I'm not following it closely. But moreso because I know the pattern. I just saw one of the smarter heads of the younger generation, on twitter, saying he thinks Trump is going to win. If so, the men who pay out if they're wrong will give you 7.5x whatever you choose to bet on that option. In other words, the people who have the strongest incentive to get their analysis right see Trump as a longshot. And I agree. Just watch. They'll get him.
According to conventional political wisdom Trump should have been finished off by the Megyn Kelly ambush at the debate. If Trump had followed conventional advice and backpedaled or apologized that's what would have happened. But Trump played it by instinct, not conventional wisdom. He attacked and doubled down. I don't think he's apologized for anything yet.

If they get him they're going to have to do better than old tweets or comments. Trump is the most formidable nationalist candidate since Ross Perot, and Trump has far more experience fighting the media and hostile politicians. If they want to take out a silverback like Trump they're going to have to break out the heavy weapons, and that's always risky. Since Trump is willing to play ball on the Iran-Israel thing maybe he'll get a pass. After all, Trump's policy would only delay the day muds become a majority by a decade or two. And that's if he can control the border with the jew courts stacked against him.
 
Old September 9th, 2015 #540
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,454
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

David Kupelian, The Marketing of Evil (2005)

Ch. 4: Multicultural Madness: How Western Culture Was Turned Upside Down in One Generation

Epilogue

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/M...n-TMoE-Ch4.mp3 (1:31)

- false history of america, kupelian is part of the problem he describes with his cant about founders and 'judeo-christian tradition,' failure to name the jew as the creators of various theories of multiculturalism as well as meme of 'nation of immigrants.'
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:57 AM.
Page generated in 0.16988 seconds.