Anthropology today is Jewish nonsense

Mike Jahn · March 3rd, 2004

Check out this review for the latest PBS special on how race "doesn't matter"

Look at your skin color. Now try to see its significance as a mere pigment of our collective imagination.
PBS' ``Race: The Power of an Illusion'' asks viewers to reconsider our widely shared belief in race as a legitimate means of sorting the human species.

Using science and an examination of the political and social development of America, the documentary makes the case for accepting race as an artificial distinction.

Biological anthropologist Alan Goodman says in the film that seeing people understand race as a ``biological myth'' is like ``seeing what it must have been like to understand that the world isn't flat.''

He's among the distinguished voices - including paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould, in one of his last interviews before his death in 2002 - who provide a chorus of support and scientific explanation for dismissing race as a genetic reality.

But the three-part documentary is even more demanding: While ``race'' represents nothing more than skin-deep characteristics, it argues, it's impossible to ignore because of our protracted, insistent emphasis on it and the result.

``We wanted to give people something to chew on,'' Larry Adelman, the film's creator and executive producer, said in an interview. ``We thought our job was to shake people up, to get them to think twice about that which they've long taken for granted.''

CCH Pounder (``The Shield'') is the effective narrator of the film, which airs on three consecutive Thursdays at 10 p.m. EDT beginning April 24 (check local listings). It was produced by California Newsreel, a nonprofit documentary production and distribution center.

The 35-year-old organization, with a comprehensive collection of films on black life, was in a unique position to see which topics had gone unaddressed, said Adelman, its co-director.

``What we realized is that for all this country's concern about race, nobody could agree on what it was,'' he said. ``We thought it was important to go back to first principles, to ask that question that is so basic, so fundamental, 'What is this thing called race?'

``That's the real subject of the film, to address the often unspoken assumptions that all of us carry about race.''

Assumptions that survive, Adelman said, despite the fact that the American Anthropological Association, the New England Journal of Medicine and other groups have taken explicit policy positions that race has no basis in biology: There are no genes that distinguish all members of one race from all members of another race.

There is a minority opinion which continues to describe race as genetic but which disregards science, Adelman said. He said did not feel compelled to turn the film into a ``survey course'' including those dissenters.

The film's first hour, ``The Difference Between Us,'' addresses commonly held attitudes and their roots.

We watch as a group of high school students test their DNA and their expectation that they will prove similar to students with shared ancestry.::::::::

Goodman, Gould, Adelman....and yet millions of White students will swallow this Jewish/Marxist shit as the ultimate in truth.

March 4th, 2004

I couldn't agree more. Archaeology, and in actuality, all of the sciences related to uncovering our history and the history of this planet are puppets of the status quo. Darwinism, despite blatent evidence from the get-go that it doesn't hold water, is still vehemently defended by "academics" who are only interested in publishing papers to gain acknowledgement and to obtain funding. This is but one example.

Whirlwind · March 8th, 2004

Exactly. Anthropologists can determine race by skeletal remains. Yet race is a social construct. That left a record in bone? This is too loopy for me to even think any further along that line. Think about Kennewick Man and the Haplo group marker shared by injuns and Europeans. They consumed our ancestors in N.America. The mongrel hordes are on the move again. Whites are culture bearers. All the others are poor imitators that degrade into culture destroyers. The condensed history of the world.

March 8th, 2004

The only reason these "recognized" institutions and "field leaders" state that race is irrelevent is they know that they can kiss funding, and their careers, goodbye if they state otherwise. The sciences are just as corrupt as politics and business. It's all about appearance and bending over for the people who have the cash to make you say what they want you to say.

Mike Jahn · March 9th, 2004

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gallytuck

The only reason these "recognized" institutions and "field leaders" state that race is irrelevent is they know that they can kiss funding, and their careers, goodbye if they state otherwise. The sciences are just as corrupt as politics and business. It's all about appearance and bending over for the people who have the cash to make you say what they want you to say.

Of course, but why don't the masses understand this? They automatically consider something to be FACT if it's being stated by someone who has a College degree. They don't realize that if any of the elite told the real TRUTH they would no longer be the elite...isn't that interesting?? Afterwards, with them no longer in the elite, the masses wouldn't listen to them anymore....

March 3rd, 2004	#1
Mike Jahn Banned Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 7,526 Blog Entries: 3	Anthropology today is Jewish nonsense Check out this review for the latest PBS special on how race "doesn't matter" Look at your skin color. Now try to see its significance as a mere pigment of our collective imagination. PBS' ``Race: The Power of an Illusion'' asks viewers to reconsider our widely shared belief in race as a legitimate means of sorting the human species. Using science and an examination of the political and social development of America, the documentary makes the case for accepting race as an artificial distinction. Biological anthropologist Alan Goodman says in the film that seeing people understand race as a ``biological myth'' is like ``seeing what it must have been like to understand that the world isn't flat.'' He's among the distinguished voices - including paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould, in one of his last interviews before his death in 2002 - who provide a chorus of support and scientific explanation for dismissing race as a genetic reality. But the three-part documentary is even more demanding: While ``race'' represents nothing more than skin-deep characteristics, it argues, it's impossible to ignore because of our protracted, insistent emphasis on it and the result. ``We wanted to give people something to chew on,'' Larry Adelman, the film's creator and executive producer, said in an interview. ``We thought our job was to shake people up, to get them to think twice about that which they've long taken for granted.'' CCH Pounder (``The Shield'') is the effective narrator of the film, which airs on three consecutive Thursdays at 10 p.m. EDT beginning April 24 (check local listings). It was produced by California Newsreel, a nonprofit documentary production and distribution center. The 35-year-old organization, with a comprehensive collection of films on black life, was in a unique position to see which topics had gone unaddressed, said Adelman, its co-director. ``What we realized is that for all this country's concern about race, nobody could agree on what it was,'' he said. ``We thought it was important to go back to first principles, to ask that question that is so basic, so fundamental, 'What is this thing called race?' ``That's the real subject of the film, to address the often unspoken assumptions that all of us carry about race.'' Assumptions that survive, Adelman said, despite the fact that the American Anthropological Association, the New England Journal of Medicine and other groups have taken explicit policy positions that race has no basis in biology: There are no genes that distinguish all members of one race from all members of another race. There is a minority opinion which continues to describe race as genetic but which disregards science, Adelman said. He said did not feel compelled to turn the film into a ``survey course'' including those dissenters. The film's first hour, ``The Difference Between Us,'' addresses commonly held attitudes and their roots. We watch as a group of high school students test their DNA and their expectation that they will prove similar to students with shared ancestry.:::::::: Goodman, Gould, Adelman....and yet millions of White students will swallow this Jewish/Marxist shit as the ultimate in truth.

Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

March 4th, 2004	#2
Gallytuck Guest Posts: n/a	I couldn't agree more. Archaeology, and in actuality, all of the sciences related to uncovering our history and the history of this planet are puppets of the status quo. Darwinism, despite blatent evidence from the get-go that it doesn't hold water, is still vehemently defended by "academics" who are only interested in publishing papers to gain acknowledgement and to obtain funding. This is but one example.

March 8th, 2004	#3
Whirlwind Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: S.E.PA Posts: 1,626	Exactly. Anthropologists can determine race by skeletal remains. Yet race is a social construct. That left a record in bone? This is too loopy for me to even think any further along that line. Think about Kennewick Man and the Haplo group marker shared by injuns and Europeans. They consumed our ancestors in N.America. The mongrel hordes are on the move again. Whites are culture bearers. All the others are poor imitators that degrade into culture destroyers. The condensed history of the world.