|
February 8th, 2004 | #21 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Otherwise, why don't you learn to READ? |
|
February 8th, 2004 | #22 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
" I have declared again and again that if I say Aryas, I mean neither blood nor bones, nor hair, nor skull; I mean simply those who speak an Aryan language... to me an ethnologist who speaks of Aryan race, Aryan blood, Aryan eyes and hair, is as great a sinner as a linguist who speaks of a dolichocephalic dictionary or a brachycephalic grammar." (Max Muller, Biographies of Words and the Home of the Aryas, 1888, pg 120)... ...Further, a recent landmark global study in population genetics by a team of internationally reputed scientists over 50 years (The History and Geography of Human Genes, by Luca Cavalli-Sforza, Paolo Menozzi and Alberto Piazza, Princeton University Press) reveals that the people habitated in the Indian subcontinent and nearby including Europe, all belong to one single race of Caucasion type. According to this study, there is essentially, and has been no difference racially between north Indians and the so-called Dravidian South Indians. The racial composition has remained almost the same for millennia. This study also confirms that there is no race called as an Aryan race... http://www.hindunet.org/hindu_histor...n_agrawal.html |
|
February 8th, 2004 | #23 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
February 9th, 2004 | #24 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
February 9th, 2004 | #25 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
It includes many horrible things, because the human mind is horrible. It has been said that before a child can receive their bar or bat mitzvah (the rite in which they become an adult, and responsible before God for following Jewish law), they should be capable of arguing a reason for breaking each one of the ten commandments. Not that they should break them, mind you, but that they should be intellectually adept enough to do so. I noticed that you didn't send me any links to the Talmud itself. What you've sent is someone's ideas of the Talmud, who has a personal agenda to destroy Judaism and its supporters. Of course, that person maybe feels jutified, because they think that the Jews want to destroy him. No where in those links, though, do you see the actual Talmud. Just the excerpts that someone has selected to bolster their arguments. In the Talmud, as in Shakespeare, you will find the most horrible, to the ridiculous, to the sublime. It is not considered kosher to cut out some parts of it to make oneself look better. It is all there--the good, the bad, and the ugly. As in the law we remember--about stoning an adulterer--it was rarely if ever put into practice. There were so many laws and sublaws (for example, two witnesses had to catch the adulterer in the act, etc., etc.) that it just rarely happened. So I'm not surprised to find that there may be something in there about marrying or having sex with a three year old. While it's repugnant to anyone but a pedophile, it is a situation that someone, somewhere must have felt merited need of a "spiritual referee", so to speak (and hmmmm, I wonder what the proportion of "white" pedophiles is compared to "jewish" pedophiles--but I digress....) The Talmud is speculation about Jewish law, pure and simple. This conversation is similar to one about mathematics or chess. The man who was portrayed in "A Brilliant Mind" could look at a screen full of numbers and see patterns that no one else could even imagine. Expert chess players can look at a game and see it from beginning to end. But just because people can function on an extremely abstract level, doesn't make them candidates for "Good Neighbor of the Year". They're usually not the people that people want to go out and have a beer with after the game. So that Talmudic scholars may have said some really offensive things It doesn't mean that they advocated violence or child abuse. All I can say is study it before you jump to conclusions. Don't take the mutton-headed views of someone who has a hidden agenda. |
|
February 9th, 2004 | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Missouri, USSA
Posts: 922
|
"There are no cruelties in ancient history ... that the inventiveness of our contemporaries ... has not outdone. But cruelty, the violence of cowards, is merely one expression of violence among many, though admittedly the most repulsive one. ...[M]an has become ... more and more violent--and not less and less so, as people fed on pacifist propaganda are often inclined to think.
"As time goes on and as decay sets in, the keynote of human history is not less violence; it is less honesty about violence. "The only time modern men and women do not try to minimize horrors but actually exaggerate them (and often deliberately invent them) is when these happen to be, or are intended to be presented as "the enemy's" horrors--never their own. And that is itself only a further instance of the worldwide characteristic of our times: the general love of lies." --Savitri Devi, The Lightning and the Sun "I am one of the few goyim who have ever actually tackled the Talmud. I suppose you now expect me to add that it is a profound and noble work, worthy of hard study by all other goyim. Unhappily, my report must differ from this expectation. It seems to me, save for a few bright spots, to be quite indistinguishable from rubbish.... " --H.L. Mencken
__________________
Produce good men -- the rest follows. --William G. Simpson The Morality of Survival Last edited by Ossian; February 9th, 2004 at 11:09 PM. |
February 10th, 2004 | #27 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Just go to the original, holographic documents. Most of the hoopla is from Dillings admittedly prejudiced work. She underlines a few passages, and ignores thousands of others. The footnotes should also be read. That website provides the original documents if you follow the links. And I think I figured out what this three-year old thing is about. Read the following: Bath Sheba being only six years when she conceived, because a woman has more [generative] vitality; the proof being that she bore a child before Solomon?18 — It is also written. Then Abraham fell upon his face, and laughed and said in his heart, shall a child be born unto him that is on hundred years old? and shall Sarah, that is ninety years old bear?24 Hence, Abraham was ten years older than Sarah, and two years older than her father [Haran]. Therefore, Sarah must have been born when Haran was eight years old. But why so: perhaps Abram was the youngest of the brethren, the Writ giving them in order of wisdom? In proof of this contention, it is written, And Noah was five hundred years old, and Noah begat Shem, Ham and Japheth; hence [if the order is according to age], Deduct fourteen, Bezaleel's age at the time,36 this leaves twenty-six [as Caleb's age at Bezaleel's birth]. Now, deduct two years for the three pregnancies; hence each must have begotten at the age of eight.37 http://www.come-and-hear.com/sanhedr...in_69.html#E82 Now, as I said at the beginning, take into account the Talmud is the commentary on the Torah, much like law offices are filled with books on various opinions on legal decisions. Some of those old rabbis had nothing better to do than sit around in dark offices, figuring out how many angels could dance on the head of a pin. So someone, somehow, figured out that there was a time when time was not what it is today. People were adults at three and six and eight, and had children accordingly. They also had children when they were hundreds of years old. I, for one, would attribute the discrepancies to a scribe's errors, or to somebody getting drunk while they were writing out those old boring manuscripts. But they took things literally. I would venture to guess that more pederasts in some trailer trash community in one year commit these despicable acts than all of the times put together in all of Jewish history. But that doesn't mean that the perpetrators shouldn't have been punished in a slow, memorable way before dying, Jew or "white". I also happen to agree with Mencken, as would most Jews, I'd venture to guess. At least the ones I know. |
|
February 10th, 2004 | #28 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
http://www.come-and-hear.com/sanhedr...in_69.html#E82 From the same "Jewish" Encyclopedia that Diller misquotes. And FYI, this same kind of batting around of ideas is EXACTLY what the Talmud is about. None of them are law, like the Torah. Haven't read the quote about Christ boiling in excrement, but would imagine that it might have something to do with Him being considered a false Messiah, and having brought down the Roman Empire around their ears. That might do it, although I disagree with the interpretation. Anyway, adios. |
|
February 10th, 2004 | #29 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,247
|
Quote:
__________________
Anti-Nazi is a codeword for anti-White. www.national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com www.noncounterproductive.blogspot.com www.williamlutherpierce.blogspot.com Last edited by Hadding; February 10th, 2004 at 10:11 PM. |
|
February 14th, 2004 | #30 |
Doubts the official story
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Pineywoods
Posts: 4,974
|
Semantics
Just as the word Aryan was coined by a 19th Cen. linguistics scholar and is meant to pertains only to language, the same applies the word Semitic. Look it up in your Websters, it describes the language family of speakers of Arabic, Hebrew, Maltese, etc. So, how is it that by adding the prefix anti we get a word that now is limited only to describing anyone critical of the zionist Entity? Shouldn't, by your argument, an antisemite be someone who hates the Maltese language or perhaps Arabic?
Tell me, when you discovered that Aryan described only a language family and not a people as such, did you drop your study of "Aryan history" that you allege brought you to this forum in the first place? You remind me of the negress that ran the "multicultural awareness" indroctrination class that I was forced to attend to in order to remain employed.The first thing she told us was that race doesn't exist, then she spent two days telling us how badly her race is abused by mine and how I should be her ally to help mitigate the injustice, blah, blah. You can see race exhibited in other species; Grackes are divided into a purple and a bronze race based on the sheen of their feathers. Snow geese and Blue geese are the same bird, different colors. Breeds in domestic animals are similar. Sometimes race blends into speciation in some animals; lions and tigers can inter-breed and the result differs according to the sex of the species, gigantism is associated with either the tigon or the liger, I forget which. I read a recent book on bears that states that all but two of the seven or so species of bear can successfully interbreed, polar bears and browns have "accidently" interbred in captivity. They could as well breed with sloth bears. And here is my point; the resulting hybrid would likely be a failure in either catching seals or snorting termites from a rotten log. Fortunately for the bears there is no global parasitic breed of uber-bear that wants to tikkun that miscegination into being. |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|