Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old October 17th, 2020 #1
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default Inside the Auschwitz ‘Gas Chambers’

Inside the Auschwitz ‘Gas Chambers’


By Fred A. Leuchter

Published: 1989-01-06

Introduction

1988 was a very informative and likewise disturbing year. I was appalled to learn that much of what I was taught in school about twentieth-century history and World War II was a myth, if not a lie. I was first amazed; then annoyed; then aware: the myth of the Holocaust was dead.

Like all American children born during and after World War II, I was taught about the genocide perpetrated by the “Nazis” on the jews. By the time I had reached college, I had no reason to disbelieve any of my education, except that I had some problems swallowing the numbers of decedents, said to total some six million. But there it stopped. I believed in the “Nazi” genocide. I had no reason to disbelieve.

Some 24 years later, a very believing engineer sat at his desk working one snowy January afternoon in 1988, when the telephone rang. This very believing engineer was about to receive a very shocking history lesson, one which would cause him to question that 50-year-old Holocaust lie and the application of that lie to generations of children. “Hello, this is Robert Faurisson” — and that very believing engineer would believe no more.

http://www.renegadetribune.com/insid...-gas-chambers/
 
Old October 19th, 2020 #2
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default



No Holes, No Holocaust” Robert Faurisson first put this forth in 1994 and says his reasoning behind it was as follows:

1.Auschwitz is at the centre of the “Holocaust”;

2.The great crematoria of Auschwitz-Birkenau, or Auschwitz-II, are at the centre of the vast Auschwitz complex;

3.At the heart of these crematoria there were, supposedly, one or several homicidal gas chambers;

4.At a single one of these crematoria (crematorium # 2), although it is in ruins, is it today possible to go and examine the room said to have been a gas chamber; it is the presumed scene of the crime, itself presumed as well;

5.We are told that, in order to kill the Jewish detainees locked inside, an SS man, moving about on the concrete roof of the said gas chamber, poured Zyklon B pellets through four regular openings situated in the roof;

6.However, one need only have eyes to see and realise that no such openings have ever existed there;

7.Therefore the crime cannot have been committed.

For R. J. van Pelt, testifying against Irving at the Irving vs Lipstadt libel trial in Canada in the year 2000, it was near torture trying to find a reply to this argument. Justice [Charles] Gray as well had to acknowledge “the apparent absence of evidence of holes” (p. 490 of the verbatim transcript) and, in a more general way, he conceded that “contemporaneous documents yield little clear evidence of the existence of gas chambers designed to kill humans” (p. 489; for more details one may consult pages 458-460, 466-467, 475-478 and 490-506). In the text of his judgment, Charles Gray admitted surprise: “I have to confess that, in common I suspect with most other people, I had supposed that the evidence of mass extermination of Jews in the gas chambers at Auschwitz was compelling. I have, however, set aside this preconception when assessing the evidence adduced by the parties in these proceedings.”

The coup de grâce given, on December 27, 2009,

to the myth of the Nazi “gas chambers”


The blow was administered by a Jewish academic, Robert Jan van Pelt, whom one may consider the last person to have sought to prove scientifically that Auschwitz, the capital of “the Holocaust”, had been an “extermination camp” (an American term coined in November 1944), that is, a camp equipped with extermination “gas chambers”. The revisionists had no opponent more determined and more resolved to fight them on the historical and scientific level than this professor teaching the history of architecture at the University of Waterloo (Ontario, Canada). He defended the usual argument holding that, to gas several thousand Jews at a time, an SS man, having got up on the roof of certain “gas chambers”, poured Zyklon B pellets through four holes made in the concrete ceiling of the said “gas chambers”. Ever under the pressure of revisionist discoveries, he had been bound to concur that the holes in the small Krematorium I had been created by… the Soviets and the Polish communists. But R.J. van Pelt and his friends were sure of finding such holes in the concrete roofs, in ruins, of Krematoriums II and III [in the Birkenau camp]. However, after years of research, they proved unable to supply a single photograph of those holes or of the perforated shafts (?) that allegedly had allowed the diffusion of hydrogen cyanide gas underneath, thus failing to meet my challenge summed up in the formula: “No holes, no Holocaust”


For more, see: https://robertfaurisson.blogspot.com...continued.html


For further study of this subject, see the following articles from The Revisionist magazine, 2004 : “The Elusive Holes of Death”, Germar Rudolf; “No Holes, No Gas Chamber(s)”, Carlo Mattogno; “The Openings For the Introduction of Zyklon B, Part 1” and “The Openings For the Introduction of Zyklon B, Part 2”, Carlo Mattogno.

Last edited by alex revision; October 19th, 2020 at 04:14 AM.
 
Old October 20th, 2020 #3
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default

Another scientific document that by itself explodes the myth of Hitler’s gas chambers

Robert Faurisson

July 7, 2016

Since the early 1960s, first in my research, then in my articles, studies and books I have abundantly covered the scientific reasons why the alleged gas chambers of Adolf Hitler never existed nor even could have existed. I shall not repeat those reasons here. For once, I shall be content with merely presenting one document and one only in support of the findings from my research. It is a toxicological information file from the French national institute of research and safety (INRS) for the prevention of occupational accidents and illnesses (30, rue Olivier Noyer, 75680, Paris Cedex; telephone +33 1 40 44 30 00; website: www.inrs.fr; email: [email protected]). Eight pages long, this document, updated in 2011, is number 4 of a series of 311 files to date. “Hydrogen cyanide” means the gas (HCN) whilst its synonym “hydrocyanic acid” is used to designate the solution. It will be recalled that the pesticide Zyklon B, invented in the 1920s and purportedly employed for killing massive numbers of detainees at Auschwitz and elsewhere, is hydrocyanic acid in an inert porous base (for example, diatomaceous earth). For its production by the DEGESCH company and its description, along with the precautions – drastic ones – for its use, the reader may refer to documents NI-9098 and NI-9912, as reproduced in my book Mémoire en défense contre ceux qui m’accusent de falsifier l’histoire, Paris, La Vieille Taupe, 1980 XXIV-280 p.; p. 161-178.

“Numéro CAS” designates the American reference number of the gas (Chemical Abstract Service) whilst the “Numéro EC” is its European Union reference number.

In order to facilitate and summarise the reading of the first seven pages (the eighth and final page contains only a part of the bibliography), I reproduce below the main fragments. One will note that HCN is a) highly inflammable, b) highly explosive and c) highly dangerous for the environment, to such a degree that its use in a crematorium is inconceivable.

Main fragments of the toxicological information file


Page 1: Liquid and vapours extremely inflammable. Lethal by inhalation. Very toxic for aquatic organisms, has deleterious effects over very long term.

Page 2: Hydrogen cyanide, if it is not strictly pure or stabilised, may polymerise dangerously (formation of black solid compounds). After an incubation period, polymerisation is rapid and violent and may be explosive.

Page 3: Hydrogen cyanide is a highly inflammable compound [...] Fires caused by hydrogen cyanide are extremely dangerous because of the risk of poisoning that they pose to the surroundings. Operatives, properly qualified, will be equipped with autonomous insulating breathing apparatus and special protective suits resistant to hydrogen cyanide.

Page 4: Acute toxicity. Overwhelming (or peracute) form.

Page 6: Because of the high toxicity of hydrogen cyanide, its inflammability and the risks of explosion that it poses, very severe prevention and protection measures are necessary during this product’s storage and handling. […] Store the product in separate, well ventilated rooms, away from any source of ignition and from rays of sunlight. […] Those rooms will be accessible only to authorised and trained persons. Never allow anyone to enter those rooms unaccompanied. […] Inhalation of gas or vapours must absolutely be avoided. […] Provide a suction of the gas or vapours at their source of emission and a general ventilation of the premises. […] Prevent all contact of the product with the skin and eyes. […] Do not smoke, drink or eat in the workplaces. Observe strict standards of personal and clothing hygiene: shower and change of clothing after work.

Page 7: Do not discharge waters polluted with hydrogen cyanide into drains or into the natural environment. […] The magnitude of the potential risks of acute hydrocyanic poisoning necessitates well-organised training and instruction of all staff and the presence of first-aid personnel trained in the actions to take in these specific accidents; these persons must necessarily attend periodic refresher courses. […] The occupational physician must provide [...] equipment for assisted ventilation and especially for oxygenotherapy with mask. Cutaneous decontamination, if necessary, after complete disrobing, under the shower and by a person clad in protective gear, oxygenotherapy with mask – failing which, assisted ventilation with mask – until the arrival of the emergency medical personnel; [...] Mouth-to-mouth assisted ventilation must not be practised.

Commentary


What this file tells us in its frankness and scientific precision should lead any honest man to infer that a use of this gas in proximity to a room with several crematory ovens, which must be laboriously brought to the temperature of 900° C, is a matter of radical impossibility. An explosion would be inevitable especially if, under the same roof, the room alleged to be an execution gas chamber adjoined a cremation room (as in Krema I at Auschwitz-I). It would be likewise were the cremation room located on the floor above (as were Crematoria II and III at Birkenau): nothing could have prevented the gas from rising naturally towards that floor via the lift shaft, the lift itself being full of gas-saturated corpses. On March 19, 1976 I discovered the building plans of the five structures at Auschwitz-Birkenau essentially designed, we are told, to house a gas chamber and a cremation room. These plans had until then been kept hidden by the Auschwitz State Museum. And quite understandably! As for what the alleged undressing rooms and homicidal gas chambers actually were one may consult Serge Thion’s Vérité historique ou Vérité politique ? Le dossier de l’affaire Faurisson. La question des chambres à gaz, Paris, La Vieille Taupe, 1980, 352 p.; p. 310-322. The book relates or reproduces the essentials of my own discoveries.

Our opponents have had occasion to bring up, for example, the argument holding that the risks of explosion would have been nil since the level of concentration needed to produce an explosive mixture would necessarily have been avoided. However, this argument is worthless for, if a weapon is explosive in such a theoretical condition, no one can be certain that that condition will not come about whether by accident or from any other cause; in short, if a gas is classed as explosive, it is therefore deemed liable to explode and, as is well known, “one does not play with fire”.


One last point: in the United States, the gas used for the execution of condemned prisoners was, precisely, HCN. I have dealt with the subject in considerable depth, describing the inevitable complication of the American gas chambers and of the procedure to follow in order to avoid accidents. For example, if the prisoner was secured so tightly it was to prevent him, in his agonising desperation, from writhing in his seat, thus creating friction and, perhaps, the static electricity that might cause an explosion.

July 7, 2016


Attachment: safety information file FT 4 INRS, 2011















 
Old October 26th, 2020 #4
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default

The witnesses of the Auschwitz Gas Chambers

Robert Faurisson

SUMMARY: A witness's testimony must always be verified. There are two essential means of verifying testimony in criminal cases: confronting it with the material elements (in particular, through an investigation regarding the crime weapon) and detailed cross-examining of the witness on what he claims to have seen. However, in proceedings where the homicidal gas chambers of Auschwitz were concerned, no judge and no barrister had ever demanded so much as an investigation of the crime weapon; moreover, no lawyer had ever cross-examined the witnesses asking them to describe with precision even one of those chemical slaughter-houses for humans. Such was the case until 1985. When finally, that year, during the first trial of Ernst Zündel in Toronto, witnesses were cross-examined on the subject, they were completely routed. Because of that and other resounding failures before or since, those defending the argument of extermination of the Jews then began abandoning a history of Auschwitz grounded essentially in testimonies and, at present, are striving to replace it with a scientific history or, at least, a history of scientific apparence, grounded in research for facts and evidence. The "testimony-history" of Auschwitz in the manner of Elie Wiesel and Claude Lanzmann is discredited. It has had its day. It remains for the exterminationists to try to work like the revisionists, that is, on facts and evidence.

In the present study, "gas chambers" are understood as "homicidal gas chambers" or "Nazi gas chambers". "Auschwitz" must be understood both as Auschwitz-I or Auschwitz Stammlager and as Auschwitz-II or Birkenau. Finally, by "witnesses of the gas chambers" I designate indiscriminately both those who claim to have witnessed a homicidal gassing operation in the aforesaid places and those who go no further than to say that they either saw or noted the presence of a homicidal gas chamber there. Finally, by "witnesses" I mean those who are usually designated as such, whether in the courts or the media; in the former context they have expressed themselves under judicial oath, while in the latter they have testified in books, articles, films, on television or radio. Of course, certain witnesses have alternately been of both the judicial and media type.

http://robertfaurisson.blogspot.com/...auschwitz.html
 
Old October 26th, 2020 #5
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default

Auschwitz: The First Gassing – Rumor and Reality

By Carlo Mattogno

The orthodox history of Auschwitz is known to be based on an order to exterminate the jews of Europe – allegedly sent by Hitler to Himmler in the spring of 1941 and from there to the Auschwitz camp commander Rudolf Höss. This order is said to have materialized in the construction of the alleged extermination camp of Birkenau. This order, according to the interpretation that has become canonical, was implemented progressively in four stages:
  1. In September 1941 the first experimental homicidal gassing was allegedly carried out at Auschwitz using Zyklon B, which is said to represent the “discovery” of the chemical weapon for the subsequent mass extermination.
  2. At the beginning of 1942 the activity of homicidal gassing is said to have been transferred to the morgue of the crematorium at the Auschwitz Main Camp.
  3. In the following months, two houses located outside the Birkenau camp were purportedly converted into homicidal gas chambers (the so-called “Bunkers”) and began the mass extermination of Jews and sick prisoners.
  4. In March 1943, finally, the extermination activities are claimed to have been moved into the four crematoria of Birkenau, all allegedly equipped with gas chambers.

The first homicidal gassing in the Auschwitz concentration camp was allegedly carried out between September 3 and 5, 1941, in the basement of Building (Block) 13. This building was later named Block 11 because of an administrative change in the numbering of the buildings. This first gassing is said to have been the starting point of the alleged mass extermination process at Auschwitz. After having gone through the intermediate stages of the mortuary in Crematorium I of the Stammlager (Auschwitz Main Camp) and the so-called “Bunkers” at Birkenau, this claimed extermination process later led to the alleged homicidal gas chambers of the Birkenau Crematoria II through V. As such, the first homicidal gassing would therefore constitute the birth of the homicidal gas chambers and mark the “official” introduction of Zyklon B into the Auschwitz holocaust history. Moreover, it would also constitute the archetype of the alleged “selections” of registered detainees in the camp hospitals for the “gas chambers.”

The conclusion that emerges from the analyses of the available sources we have examined in this study is unambiguous: The first homicidal gassing at Auschwitz in the official reconstruction by Danuta Czech is based solely on contradictory statements of self-styled eyewitnesses and is discounted by the documents. It therefore has no historical foundation.

The story was invented in October of 1941 by one of the centers for black propaganda within the secret resistance movement at Auschwitz, from the initial idea of an experimentation with undefined combat gases on human beings in an equally undefined “Bunker” or “shelter” or “concrete building” at Auschwitz. Only later, cued by the disinfestations with Zyklon B that became more and more widespread with the enlargement of the camp, did the propagandists introduce Zyklon B into their tales and place the first gassing in the basement of Block 11. The normal removal of corpses of registered detainees who had died in the camp from the Leichenhalle of Block 28 to the crematorium was used to progressively enrich the story.

In 1946, Judge Jan Sehn, facing the task of historicizing the utterly contradictory accounts of the witnesses to enable judicial proceedings to be launched, invented the nucleus of the story, which included the canonical literary elements of the number of victims, the various phases of the gassing, but not its date. In 1959, Danuta Czech, in an even more daring manipulation of the sources, resurrected and augmented Jan Sehn’s story and drew from a mélange of diverging testimonies a purely fictitious “convergence of proof” and attributed to it a precise but completely invented date.: The first gassing had now become “history.”

This “history” reveals the deceitful tricks used by the inventors of the legend of the first gassing at Auschwitz. It also speaks volumes about the intellectual laziness of the orthodox Holocaust historians who uncritically accepted this legend and transmogrified it into an “untouchable historical truth.”

Pages 7, 8, 133


http://www.renegadetribune.com/ausch...r-and-reality/

https://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=20

http://vho.org/GB/Journals/JHR/9/2/Mattogno193-222.html
 
Old November 1st, 2020 #6
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default

The Auschwitz "Gas Chamber" Illusion

By Nicholas Kollerstrom


Published: 2008-05-24

This essay will argue that well-designed cyanide gas chambers were indeed present at Auschwitz, and did work efficiently, but that they were operated for purposes of hygiene and disinfection, in order to save lives and not take them. Terrible mass mortality came about in the German labour-camps, especially towards the end of the war, but maybe we have to try a bit harder to understand what caused this. Amongst all the archival material for the German Third Reich, there has always been a notable lack of documentation to support the existence of an intentional mass-extermination program – of Jews, or anyone else. We have all heard stories about a Nazi program of exterminating Jews, but to what extent are there documents or any physical remains showing this?

https://codoh.com/library/document/t...r-illusion/en/
 
Old November 5th, 2020 #7
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default

THE TECHNICAL IMPLAUSIBILITY OF THE ALLEGED HOMICIDAL GAS CHAMBERS AND OF THE USE OF ZYKLON-B


The entire gas chamber story is technically implausible. The official Holocaust narrative is that Zyklon-B pellets were dropped through holes in the roof onto the cold concrete floor. However the boiling point of the hydrogen cyanide (HCN) in Zyklon-B is 26ºC, the evaporation of HCN from Zyklon-B is too slow to kill humans in gas chambers in the way it has been alleged if the gas chamber temperature is below 26ºC. To kill quickly (within minutes), the “gas chamber” needs to be heated to at least 26ºC, but the kind of heating device required was not found in Auschwitz. Moreover the witnesses said it was not used at all, and claimed that the SS man just used to pour Zyklon-B through four holes in the roof. Some Holocaust-accusers explain that by saying that the human bodies in the gas chamber provided the required heating. But that is a very far-fetched “explanation”, since the human body is about 36ºC warm, it is unlikely that the human bodies are able to heat a room of – say – 5ºC in winter to 26ºC.

Execution gas chambers were invented in the USA and used because the intention is to cause painless death. The planning and realization of the execution is, however, anything but simple. The procedure is so risky, so detailed and expensive, that this method is increasingly being abandoned and being replaced by lethal injection.


A execution gas chamber must satisfy certain requirements. In the alleged use of Zyklon-B there would have to be a heating system to heat the Zyklon-B pellets. There needs to be a means of diffusing the gas into the chamber. The gas chamber needs to be hermetically sealed to prevent the gas from escaping including the holes in the roof, the doors and any other gaps as well as light fittings. There needs to be an extraction system to remove the gas from the chamber. There needs to be a very tall chimney for the gas to safely be expelled. There needs to be an extremely strong and thick steel door which can withstand the pressure of hundreds of people pushing against it trying to escape. None of these requirements existed or exist today at Auschwitz. None of these requirements were found by Fred Leuchter, Germar Rudolf, Robert Faurisson, Walter Lüftl, Fredrick Töben, John Ball, Carlo Mattogno, Jürgen Graf, Ernst Zündel, David McCalden, David Cole and others who have carried out a technical inspection of the alleged “gas chambers” – which are admitted as never being a gas chamber.

Quote:
Based upon very generous maximum usage rates for all the alleged “gas chambers” totalling some 1693 per week and assuming these facilities could support gas executions it would have required 68 years to execute the alleged number of six million persons.
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v09/v09p133_Leuchter.html
Revisionist research expanded enormously when Robert Faurisson made contact with the worldwide leader in gas chamber technology, Fred Leuchter, during the 1988 Zündel trial and Faurisson asked Leuchter to draw up an expert report on the rooms designated as gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek, which at that time still lay behind the iron curtain. He was to determine the capacity of the crematory ovens.

The Holocaust lobby later attempted discredit Fred Leuchter. They claimed that he had lied about his engineering credentials and had been bribed by the revisionists, quite apart from the fact that he was, of course, smeared as a ‘Nazi’. The Holocaust lobby nevertheless proved itself incapable of a technical rebuttal of the conclusions of the Leuchter report.

The Leuchter report had dealt a heavy blow to the Holocaust legend, other expert reports in support of Leuchter’s conclusions then followed.

Of particular significance is the Rudolf Report, after the German chemist and the evaluation of air reconnaissance photographs (Air Photo Evidence) by the Canadian geologist and air photography exert John C. Ball.

As their last card, the defenders of the orthodox version of the Holocaust then backed the French pharmacist J.C. Pressac, hailed by the media to be a converted revisionist. This is not true: Pressac did, it is true, undertake research work with Robert Faurisson, but never endorsed Faurisson’s conclusions and never published any revisionist work of his own.

His monumental work Auschwitz: The Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers is very important from a documentary point of view. For the revisionists, it represents a true mine of information, which they use extensively. From a scientific point of view, however, the work is worthless, because the author mixes reliable sources with pure fiction in the most irresponsible manner in order to reach the desired result. He does not examine opposite points of view and never cites technical literature.

Whenever Pressac stumbles across a fact which contradicts his hypothesis, he simply ignores it. The entire work appears to have been written by someone who can no longer see the forest for the trees. The same is true to an even greater extent of his second, much shorter book, Les Crématoires d’Auschwitz. La Machinerie du meurtre en mass.

The defenders of the official version of the Holocaust need not fear any sudden upswing in revisionism, of course, since disputing or even disputing the Holocaust has been made a criminal offence in several European countries. The worst countries are Germany and Austria, where revisionists risk lengthy prison sentences. Even in France, legal proceedings are regularly taken against revisionists, but the authorities are content to levy heavy fines, which ruin the defendants


The Impossible Gas Chamber
By Robert Faurisson
http://www.historiography-project.co...itz-photos.php

The Gas Chambers of Auschwitz Appear to be Physically Inconceivable
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v02/v02p312_Faurisson.html

The Auschwitz “Gas Chamber” Illusion
By Nicholas Kollerstrom
http://codoh.com/library/document/684/

A Brief History of Forensic Examinations of Auschwitz
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v20/v20n2p-3_Rudolf.html

Tell-Tale Documents and Photos from Auschwitz
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v11/v11p-67_Weber.html

https://holocaustdeprogrammingcourse.com/

Last edited by alex revision; November 5th, 2020 at 04:53 AM.
 
Old November 12th, 2020 #8
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default

The Chemistry Of Auschwitz by Germar Rudolf

The gas chambers of Auschwitz have been called the epicenter of human suffering. More human beings are said to have died a violent death there than on any other place on earth in the history of mankind.

The biggest crime scene of history, in terms of its death toll, not only demands the utmost respect for its victims, but should also attract the most-intensive attention of forensic researchers to find out what exactly happened, and how. Or so one might think.

Forensic research on Auschwitz, however, has always been controversial. Investigating the gas chamber mass murder is considered a blasphemous act, a way of disturbing the peace of the dead.

While respecting the victims, whether of foul play or of circumstance, this documentary nonetheless tries to conduct Auschwitz research on the basis of the forensic sciences, where material traces of the crime and their interpretation reign supreme. Although it is generally agreed that no autopsy of any victim has ever been performed, most of the claimed crime scenes – the chemical slaughterhouses called gas chambers – are still accessible to forensic examination to a greater or lesser degree. So, how did these gas chambers of Auschwitz look like? How did they operate? What were they used for? In addition, the infamous Zyklon B can also be examined. What exactly hides behind this ominous name? How does it kill? And what effect has it on masonry? Does it leave traces that can be found still today?

These and many other questions are thoroughly examined in this documentary. The horror of Auschwitz is meticulously dissected, and thus, for the first time, it really becomes comprehensible.

https://archive.org/details/the-chem...-germar-rudolf
 
Old November 22nd, 2020 #9
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default

Auschwitz's gas chambers an obvious hoax


In 2008, the world press spoke of the "original plans of Auschwitz" discovered in Berlin and one of which showed a "gas chamber". In this video I explain that it was a simple delousing gas chamber and I want to point out that in this room, where Zyklon B was used extensively, the walls are stained with blue spots. But, in the alleged "gas chambers" homicide, there is no blue spot. This is a simple and clear proof that in these premises, one never committed a mass murder with Zyklon B. Then, I answer to the objections developped in the opposite camp against this argument.

http://ungraindesable.the-savoisien....-%C3%A9vidente
 
Old November 22nd, 2020 #10
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default The holocaust for dummies

The Holocaust for Dummies

What is Auschwitz?

https://archive.org/details/@didi18?...rt=titleSorter
 
Old November 22nd, 2020 #11
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default

In Auschwitz open your eyes and don't listen to the guides

Vincent Reynouard

First review video about the main revisionist arguments.

Based upon students assessments who visited Auschwitz, I warn a college student or a student who will participate in turn to a "Journey of Memory"; I reveal to him how he will be manipulated.

Although the subject is dramatic, some reports of students are hilarious (just seconds to go to the bathroom, brains put in jars filled with water to protect the intelligence, 10 in tilted beds, hair ripped out if mowers are broken, twins cut and sewn back by reversing the halves ...)

http://ungraindesable.the-savoisien....-les-guides%21
 
Old November 23rd, 2020 #12
Paul Anthony
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Austria
Posts: 2,205
Default

This should be mandated reading for all children under 14

Last edited by Paul Anthony; November 26th, 2020 at 11:16 PM.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:00 AM.
Page generated in 0.54060 seconds.