Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old December 28th, 2009 #2
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,350
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Facebook friends with the lisping gook-jew Marcus Epstein.
 
Old December 28th, 2009 #3
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,350
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Believed to be a homosexual. Will sputter and spume when so charged, but not deny. Pulled out of public interview with Jim Giles of Radio Free Mississippi because did not want to answer question of his sexuality directly.
 
Old December 29th, 2009 #4
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,350
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

- outed himself as former VNN reviewer "The Cat Lady," under which name wrote reviews of such movies as "Spy Kids"
 
Old December 29th, 2009 #5
varg
...
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 9,701
varg
Default

Sympathizes with queers:


Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Johnson
It was also completely immoral to publish the Myspace profile of some poor gay guy who happens to share my name
Is sensitive towards queers feelings. Doesn't like "gay bashing"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Johnson
I guess he felt he could make it stick because I wrote a piece for VNN attacking the low-brow gay bashing on the site.
 
Old December 29th, 2009 #6
George Witzgall
Senior Member
 
George Witzgall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,961
George Witzgall
Default

varg, do you think Greg is seducing the young writers at TOQ, especially the young and highly vulnerable Hunter Wallace?

say, you're younger than Hunter, do you worry that Greg might seduce you against your will?
__________________
I understand and do not understand.
 
Old December 30th, 2009 #7
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,350
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Johnson is pretty typical for the "high road" crew. He admits in radio interview that a single article on video games drew one-third of his monthly traffic. And that movie reviews consistently outdraw everything else. Of course, VNN figured this out ten years ago. But of course, VNN aims at a general audience, not just the upper-middle class, which is the mistake GLR warned about. Of course, it's only a mistake if your aim is to create a revolution. And we know Brown Johnson's goal, as of many homosexuals, is to hold dinner parties for accomplished and sexy fellows.

Johnson is typical of the self-regarding, others-not-crediting nature of the self-styled high-roadsters. They are self-serving career girls with no loyalty to anything or anyone. In a word, they are conservatives. When something better meets their personal needs, that's what they do. They are constitutionally incapable of sticking to principle or a party line. They are the opposite of what it takes to push a cause through to success. Read what the Nazis said. They had TOQ types pegged. They write for each other, and each is out to prove he's cleverer than the last.

There is no hope in career girls, and certainly not spiteful queer career girls like "Greg Johnson," the Atlanta-based homosexual.

Notice that for all his hatred of "gay bashing," he attacked VNN's former de facto editor the minute he thought it served his purpose. Like I say - there is no loyalty among these ass-clowns. Just weakness. And sexual perversion.

Last edited by Alex Linder; December 30th, 2009 at 01:38 AM.
 
Old March 19th, 2010 #8
Mike Parker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,311
Mike Parker
Default

Lawyers & Sex Crimes:
Further Thoughts on Covington’s Northwest Quartet

Greg Johnson

Note: The following ended up on the cutting room floor as I prepared “Birth of a Nation,” my review of Harold Covington’s Northwest Quartet, for publication. I decided to cut it for lack of space, and also because I thought that even serious criticisms seemed petty when considered alongside the Quartet’s towering virtues. I came across these words while tidying up my files, and I decided to publish them as a free-standing essay because they echo and reinforce some very wise comments on Occidental Dissent by one of my favorite commentators, who goes by the name Trainspotter.

The most problematic feature of the Northwest Quartet, like The Turner Diaries, is the author’s penchant for genocidal fantasies, directed not just at non-whites, but at white people as well. The most famous such passage in The Turner Diaries tells of the “day of the rope” in which white race-traitors, particularly those who engaged in inter-racial sex, are lynched by the thousands.

Covington makes clear that the creation of a white homeland would not, and indeed could not, require the mass killing of non-whites, even though moral qualms about mass murder of civilians tend to be set aside during warfare. Such killing would be logistically impossible for a small guerrilla army, and it would be unnecessary, since Covington thinks that most non-whites could be induced to flee simply by destroying their employment and social support networks through targeted killings, beatings, and property destruction, mostly aimed at the whites who profit from and facilitate their presence.

He is less surgical and discerning in choosing his white victims, both during the war of liberation and the subsequent “cleanup.” Covington’s death list contains not just white operatives and allies of the regime, but three whole categories of individuals: lawyers, race-mixers (meaning anyone who has had interracial sex, regardless of issue), and homosexuals. This is problematic, because if white nationalism begins making progress in the Northwest, these views will be broadcast far and wide to scare white people away from white nationalism and into conformity with the system that is killing us. Beyond that, these lapses are at odds with the generally rational and pragmatic character of Covington’s political thought.

First, spare the lawyers. Although killing lawyers has the authority of the Bard, and everyone enjoys a good lawyer joke, among white nationalists of my acquaintance, lawyers are the best represented profession. Thus it seems foolish to treat all lawyers as enemies, since this will drive otherwise sympathetic and useful individuals into the arms of the system for protection.

Second, it is easy to understand why white nationalists see homosexuals as enemies, since the organized homosexual community is an integral part of the anti-white governing coalition. Beyond that, white nationalism is steeped in a right-wing, conservative subculture with strong currents of anti-homosexual sentiment, which are constantly stoked by the organized homosexual community.

But Covington’s stated rationale for murdering homosexuals is that homosexuality is a mental illness. I think that homosexuality is neither a sin (an offense against the God of the Jews) nor an illness, but rather it is something that might be called a “natural suboptimal condition,” like baldness or myopia or a propensity to pack on the pounds.

But let’s just grant Covington’s premise for the sake of argument. So what about all the other mental illnesses? Covington does not mention if melancholics, manic depressives, schizophrenics, paranoiacs, compulsive liars, kleptomaniacs, alcoholics, and other sufferers of mental maladies will be marked for death.

The reason for this is obvious: homosexuals are marked for death not because they suffer from a mental illness, but because the Bible—the Jewish Torah—tells us so. This is probably the source of the extreme animus toward race-mixers as well. It is, to put it mildly, a rather astonishing lapse. It makes it all too easy to parody white nationalists as Bible-thumping hayseeds and hillbilly psychopaths.

It also serves to drive otherwise sympathetic and useful individuals—who might be guilty of nothing more than an experimental homosexual or inter-racial dalliance while in college or the military, where such experimentation is common—into the arms of the system for protection.

What would Aryan reason, as opposed to Jewish superstition, dictate in dealing with homosexuals and race-mixers?

First, it is no policy or solution to postulate that when a white nationalist state is founded it will simply chase away or kill the homosexuals on its territory, for inevitably new homosexuals will appear (it does not matter whether by nature or nurture or both). Furthermore, these individuals will manifestly not be “one of them” (the anti-white ruling coalition) but “one of us” (a racially-conscious white person, raised in a racially homogenous and self-conscious society).

On Covington’s premise, the policy a rational society adopts to homosexuality is an instance of the larger policy it should adopt toward mental illness. The appropriate attitude toward mental illness is not hatred but pity and compassion. It is reasonable to fear the unknown, but unreasonable to persist in one’s ignorance. The idea that homosexuality should be treated as a crime is a relic of benighted times when people thought that other mental illnesses were evidence of witchcraft or demonic possession and should be “treated” by torture and burning at the stake.

Mental illness is not a crime. If mentally ill people commit crimes, we punish the crimes, not the illness. Thus it would be inhuman to exile or kill our relatives simply because they suffer from manic depression or paranoia. It would be arbitrary to treat homosexuality any differently. If homosexuality is a mental illness, not a crime, then it should be treated as an illness. If it can be cured, then cure it. If it cannot be cured but can be lived with, then live with it. If it is genetically determined, then screen for it and try to decrease its representation in the next generation. (If homosexuality has a genetic component, then homosexuals should not be encouraged to “pass” as straight and pass on their genes to their children, but to live as homosexuals and take their genes out of the next generation.)

In a healthy society, people should, of course, be free to associate with or avoid homosexuals just as they are free to associate with or avoid people who suffer from other mental maladies. But to determine rational policies and attitudes toward homosexuality, one would have to compare it to other such illnesses. One would have to determine whether homosexuals are more or less reliable friends, colleagues, and comrades than, say, manic depressives, alcoholics, or compulsive liars.

Of course there would be no problems excluding homosexuals from the pup tents of boy scouts, the locker rooms of school children, or the barracks of the military. There would be no nonsense about homosexuals marrying or adopting children, which seeks to erase the distinction between the normal and the abnormal. Should society also be expected to provide everyone who thinks himself Napoleon a coronation and everyone who thinks himself Jesus a crucifixion?

The question of race-mixing is more complicated. First, the problem is not interracial sex or marriage per se. The problem is interracial babies. Of course there are no interracial babies without interracial sex, but not all interracial sex produces babies. The problem with multi-racial societies is that inter-racial sex is inevitable, because it is perfectly natural and normal for people to take advantage of a wider range of possible mates and sexual partners.

Many racialists claim that they are immune to inter-racial attractions, that they have some sort of genetic aversion. This may well be true of a tiny percentage of people, but it is surely not true of most. There may well be an instinct for mating with one’s kind, but there is no reason to think that this instinct will always trump the other instincts under certain circumstances, particularly given the power of the sex drive.

For instance, the person who had the single greatest influence on my awakening on race and the Jewish question obviously had a great deal of instinctive feeling for his own kind. But that feeling was insufficient to trump his conflicting desires for a home and a family with a woman who has not corrupted by feminism and American junk culture. So he ended up marrying a woman from the Philippines. The marriage was without issue, thank goodness, and it did not last. Now he is married to a white woman who has given him three sons. Yes, he made a potentially terrible mistake, but the idea that this man has committed a capital offense is ludicrous.

Interracial sex is not only inevitable in a multi-racial society, it is being relentlessly promoted by every organ of the establishment. (The same is true of the normalization of homosexuality.) The propaganda is particularly intense on college campuses, where sexual experimentation has always been more common. The number of college students who have had interracial dalliances is already quite high, and if present conditions continue, it will rapidly reach the point of saturation. (We will soon have a better idea if some are genetically immune to the lure of exotic flesh.)

But the percentage of these dalliances that turn into long-term interracial relationships, much less marriage and child-rearing, is still small. Indeed, some such encounters may be the first steps down the road to a full racial awakening. (This is true of one young woman of my acquaintance, who was raped by her black boyfriend.) Again, the idea that these people have committed not just a mistake but a capital crime is offensive to reason. These people are victims of our present regime, not criminals.

What then should be the attitude of a white nationalist regime to race-mixers? First, all whites who produce offspring with members of other races have, in effect, left our race for another. One cannot mix one’s blood without mixing one’s loyalties. We cannot reasonably expect that such people will be more loyal to their extended racial family than to their mixed-race children, and no white nationalist would ask them to. They could not, therefore, be citizens of a white ethnostate (much less would-be white nationalist leaders). Whites who have married non-whites without offspring or prospects of offspring clearly belong to a different category, but it is not clear that a different policy should apply.

As for whites who have had sexual relations with non-whites, or who married but then divorced non-whites without producing children: they should be able to become citizens of a white ethnostate without penalty. But this would not be possible without somehow addressing the irrational yet powerful antipathy they arouse in some racialists.

For the offenders, there needs to be a process of confession, contrition, cleansing, and atonement to incorporate them into a self-conscious white nation. Ideally, such a truth and reconciliation process should be modeled on a religious ceremony (how about a bath, for starters) rather than a legal proceeding if the atonement it produces is to be heartfelt and enduring.

But racialists need to change too. There is a larger principle here that applies to more than just sexual matters. A healthy new society can be made only by and from the products of today’s sick society. White nationalists are not an Elect, chosen by genes or by God to be immune to the corruptions of our age, thus licensing us to smugly look down upon and condemn the rest of humanity.

If there is any hope of our people at all, then most of them are capable of seeing the light, and the only thing that sets today’s white nationalists apart from them is . . . time. We saw first, but we will never be saved until they see as well.

This means that there is no room self-righteousness and much room for compassion. Indeed, the leaders of any revolution are likely to be worse rather than better than the average person in important respects. Not only are they imperfect to begin with, but given the dark necessities of revolution, they are likely to be monsters in the end. They may be creating a better world—but not for themselves.

Covington shows that he understands this in many subtle and funny ways. For instance, in The Hill of the Ravens, he remarks on how the veterans who created the Northwest American Republic shock their own grandchildren with the vulgar language and tastes inherited from Amurrica. Also, Covington’s self-portrait as “the Old Man” is hardly flattering and shows that he too is out of place in the republic he helped create.

Until we breed a race of flawless Nietzschean Supermen, we will have to muddle through with people who have a short list of essential virtues (honesty, courage, intelligence, loyalty, good-judgment, initiative) and a rather longer list of inessential flaws and past mistakes. No, I am not recommending that we try to get mileage out of creeps and kooks. Just virtuous, talented, committed, imperfect people.

Within the movement, we need to be willing to tolerate inessential flaws and past mistakes on the condition that people are honest and transparent about them. One can build with flawed materials, but only if one knows where the flaws are. We don’t want to put the guy who is hiding his dyslexia in charge of editing, the guy who is hiding his agoraphobia out distributing literature, an insecure buffoon in charge of picking up a VIP, or a creepy compulsive womanizer among the wives and daughters of comrades, etc.

A weakness is compounded by concealment. It does not become a virtue by being flaunted. But when one is willing to acknowledge one’s flaws, that is the first step toward rising above them. It is an opportunity for moral growth, a way of strengthening one’s character. Thus we have to penalize concealment and reward transparency.

For a white nationalist revolution to have any moral authority, its leaders must not just lead us to regaining control of our racial destiny. They must also lead us in self-criticism, self-purification, and atonement with the greater racial body.

Bibliographical Note:

The novels of the Northwest Quartet are:

The Hill of the Ravens
H. A. Covington
Lincoln, Nebr.: 1stBooks Library, 2003

A Distant Thunder
H. A. Covington
Bloomington, Ind.: Authorhouse, 2004

A Mighty Fortress
H. A. Covington
Bloomington, Ind.: Authorhouse, 2005

The Brigade
H. A. Covington
Philadelphia: Xlibris, 2008

http://www.toqonline.com/2010/03/law...hwest-quartet/
 
Old March 19th, 2010 #9
McKinley
coast to coast WN
 
McKinley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Louisville KY area
Posts: 5,775
McKinley
Default

So the dude is a faggot. There is no way in hell that a person is born a shit munched.

Last edited by McKinley; March 19th, 2010 at 01:42 PM.
 
Old March 27th, 2010 #10
Mike Parker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,311
Mike Parker
Thumbs up It has its moments

1. Jews may give up their “left-wing bias,” but they will never give up their pro-Jew/anti-us bias, and their history repeatedly shows that when their hatred of us conflicts with their love of themselves (considerations of collective self-interest), Jews usually hate us more than they love themselves, which is why they have repeatedly driven their hosts to homicidal rage.

Therefore, it is just a fantasy that enlightened self-interest will get Jews to take their foot off the accelerator as they drive the West and themselves into the ditch. No, the typical Jew will destroy the West, then curse us for failing them. That’s what makes Jews so evil: overwhelming will to power that is destructive because it is unbounded by reason, conscience, and personal responsibility.

2. Wilders, Griffin, and other Euro-nationalists think that they can split the Jewish anti-nationalist bloc by appealing to Jewish fears of Muslim immigration into Europe. They think that Jews who respond to their overtures see the logic of their position and sincerely wish to help out.

I think they are fooling themselves.

The Jews chose to plunk their ethnostate in a sea of hostile Muslims, whom they viciously abuse without any thought of the possible long-term consequences. In a sea of hostile Muslims, it is just Jew business as usual.

So why do Wilders et al. think that comparatively minuscule populations of Muslims in Europe will get Jews to alter business as usual? The Jews who involve themselves in euro-nationalist parties may actually be sincere. But there is no way of knowing. Doesn’t prudence dictate that we assume more Jew business as usual, i.e., that they are there to disrupt and subvert these parties?

3. Jews are adapted to being a minority. We are not. As we become a minority, we lose collective power and they gain it. Why then would anyone expect Jews to work sincerely to preserve the white majority? What’s in it for them?

And even if there were something in it for them, we must return to the question: Do they hate us more than they love themselves? If the answer is yes, and I think that it is, then convergences of interest between Jews and whites don’t really matter.

4. Kevin MacDonald once told me that Jews have a dominance strategy, not a survival strategy. It is great for gaining power, but once Jews get behind the wheel, they have no brakes, and they always end up crashing. That is not a good survival strategy. If Jews are more interested in dominance than survival, then again, how do we appeal to their rational self-interest?

5. The deeper error here is the assumption that human beings are ruled by reason rather than by will to power. Reason is a rather superficial faculty, that negotiates between will to power and objective conditions. Whites are the most creative race, because we are the most rational. Our reason gives our will to power objective form as the glories of Western civilization. But we have become so rational that we have talked ourselves out of healthy biological self-assertiveness. We have made ourselves sick with reason.

Jews suffer none of this. They are the most vital and least rational/intellectual people on earth. What? Jews non-intellectual? Yes. Jews chug away creating systems of ideas, like squids produce ink and skunks produce stink, but they never really believe them, so their ideas never get in the way of their collective pursuit of dominance. Unfortunately, their reason never intervenes when they need to apply the brakes either.

http://www.toqonline.com/2010/03/sec.../#comment-7006
 
Old March 28th, 2010 #11
Igor Alexander
Senior Member
 
Igor Alexander's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,591
Igor Alexander
Default

Quote:
2. Wilders, Griffin, and other Euro-nationalists think that they can split the Jewish anti-nationalist bloc by appealing to Jewish fears of Muslim immigration into Europe. They think that Jews who respond to their overtures see the logic of their position and sincerely wish to help out.

I think they are fooling themselves.

The Jews chose to plunk their ethnostate in a sea of hostile Muslims, whom they viciously abuse without any thought of the possible long-term consequences. In a sea of hostile Muslims, it is just Jew business as usual.

So why do Wilders et al. think that comparatively minuscule populations of Muslims in Europe will get Jews to alter business as usual?
The pseudo-nationalists think they're using the jews, but really the jews are using them.

Griffin and his type are walking a thin line between white nationalism and neo-cohnservatism.
__________________
The jewish tribe is the cancer of human history.
http://igoralexander.wordpress.com/
 
Old March 28th, 2010 #12
Igor Alexander
Senior Member
 
Igor Alexander's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,591
Igor Alexander
Default

Quote:
Jews chug away creating systems of ideas, like squids produce ink and skunks produce stink...
That almost sounds like a Linderism!
__________________
The jewish tribe is the cancer of human history.
http://igoralexander.wordpress.com/
 
Old March 29th, 2010 #13
Mike Parker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,311
Mike Parker
Default

How do you reconcile Johnson's insightful critique of Wilders and Griffin with his promotion of Jared Taylor? If the Jews' approach to their ethnostate lacks any thought of long-term consequences, what does that tell us about their approach to US immigration policy? If we assume Jews are there to disrupt and subvert BNP and PVV, what are they doing in AmRen?
 
Old April 25th, 2010 #14
Celtic_Patriot
Senior Member
 
Celtic_Patriot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,670
Celtic_Patriot
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Parker View Post
If the Jews' approach to their ethnostate lacks any thought of long-term consequences, what does that tell us about their approach to US immigration policy?
Jews don't have any ethnostate. Only Zionists believe Israel exists legally.




.
__________________
Красным цветом в России будет цвет коммунистических еврейств

.
 
Old May 17th, 2010 #15
Mike Parker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,311
Mike Parker
Default

Announcing Counter-Currents with Greg Johnson

May 14, 2010

The Voice of Reason Broadcast Network is pleased to announce a new program, Counter-Currents, hosted by Greg Johnson. The show will run weekly Thursday 10 to 11 PM, Eastern U.S. time. It debuts Thu., May 27, 2010.

Counter-Currents will examine individuals, institutions, movements, and trends that go against the currents of the modern age by resisting decadence, dehumanization, and the destruction of the natural order.

About Greg Johnson

Greg Johnson, Ph.D., is an independent scholar and translator who focuses on Traditionalism, the European New Right, Western Esotericism, anti-globalization movements, deep ecology, and sustainable lifestyles. He is Editor-in-Chief of Counter-Currents Publishing, Ltd., “Books Against Time.”

http://reasonradionetwork.com/?p=7242
 
Old May 17th, 2010 #16
varg
...
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 9,701
varg
Default

Can't wait to hear The Cat Ladies lispy review of Sex and the City 2!
 
Old May 20th, 2010 #17
Julian Lüchow
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kansas
Posts: 888
Julian Lüchow
Post

According to FB, not the most reliable source I admit, Greg Johnson was fired from TOQ. Now, the reasons given were the usual "ideological differences" excuses. But I wonder if there wasn't something to the homosexual allegations that came out last holiday season thanks to our little campaign here (just imho, anyone who goes by the name "Cat LAdy" and writes anti-"gay bashing" screeds is a queer).
 
Old May 21st, 2010 #18
Igor Alexander
Senior Member
 
Igor Alexander's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,591
Igor Alexander
Default

Quote:
Greetings,

I am Samuel J. Phillips. I’ve agreed to become the new webmaster of TOQ Online. The first order of business is to inform our readers of some recent changes around here.

This website has a new Twitter account and Facebook fan page. Unfortunately, the old Facebook group is no longer under our control. That is why it hasn’t been updated recently. We have been forced to create a new Facebook presence from scratch. Invitations will be sent out soon. Please update your Favorite’s List with the links provided above.

Many of you want to know why this website has been in limbo for a month now. I expect a statement about that will be released soon. My duties here include overseeing the website and maintaining an active presence on social networking services. It is not my place to comment on other matters.
http://www.toqonline.com/2010/05/toq...k-and-twitter/
__________________
The jewish tribe is the cancer of human history.
http://igoralexander.wordpress.com/
 
Old May 21st, 2010 #19
Igor Alexander
Senior Member
 
Igor Alexander's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,591
Igor Alexander
Default

Quote:
Greg Johnson, Ph.D., is an independent scholar and translator who focuses on Traditionalism, the European New Right, Western Esotericism, anti-globalization movements, deep ecology, and sustainable lifestyles.
The last two must be typos. Surely it should read "deep throating" and "alternative lifestyles."

Quote:
He is Editor-in-Chief of Counter-Currents Publishing, Ltd., “Books Against Time.”
Does this mean The Cat Lady has taken the book publishing arm of TOQ with him? At any rate, I wish The Cat Lady the best of luck with his new "Lavender WN" series of books for teenaged boys.

Third Positionism, Counter-Currents... it all has sort of a "gay" ring to it, doesn't it?
__________________
The jewish tribe is the cancer of human history.
http://igoralexander.wordpress.com/

Last edited by Igor Alexander; May 21st, 2010 at 07:41 AM.
 
Old May 21st, 2010 #20
Igor Alexander
Senior Member
 
Igor Alexander's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,591
Igor Alexander
Default

Looks like KMac took charge of the print journal. I take it The Cat Lady was the editor until now?

Quote:
Samuel J. Phillips
Posted May 20, 2010 at 11:04 pm | Permalink

The print journal is now in the capable hands of the new TOQ editor, Dr. Kevin MacDonald.
http://www.toqonline.com/2010/05/toq.../#comment-7974
__________________
The jewish tribe is the cancer of human history.
http://igoralexander.wordpress.com/
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:16 PM.
Page generated in 0.14783 seconds.