|
October 13th, 2017 | #1 |
Administrator
|
Human Origins Out of Europe
|
October 13th, 2017 | #2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 179
|
We aren't related to either imo.
|
October 13th, 2017 | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,156
|
The RH Rhesus negative blood types do not possess the gene found within rhesus monkeys and therefore cannot be said to originate from Africa. Science is at a loss to explain where the RH Rhesus negative blood types originated.
|
October 13th, 2017 | #4 |
Intellijintly Dezined
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
|
Maybe/maybe not, same as what they found in Spain, yet this is the oldest. And even with it being the oldest fossilized hominin species, look at the difference in the conjecture.
Cole is almost saying he's sorry for daring to suggest weez all not chilrun of Lucy. They treated East African discoveries like the end all be all of truth, and when it's a European discovered to possibly be the mama of everything...hang on a minute, this is just a theory, we must test all possibilities. That's the correct attitude, but notice it was not applied to niggers. If it can be used to prop up nigger daydreams it is aided with feverish passion.
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier Last edited by Emily Henderson; October 13th, 2017 at 10:12 AM. Reason: Error befitting a descendant of Lucy |
October 13th, 2017 | #5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 179
|
This European man origin has been around for years. This isn't new. It never has or will gain any traction in the media because it doesn't fit their race mixing agenda that we all descended from Africans. But sure I've used it a few times to on whites who try and give me the "we are all descended from Africans" spiel. Deep down I don't personally believe it though. That's all I'm saying.
|
October 13th, 2017 | #6 |
Jeunesse Dorée
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Four Seasons Jalalabad
Posts: 9,750
|
Should be interesting to see how long it will take until school textbooks reflect these new facts... probably in a few decades...
__________________
_______ Political correctness is an intellectual gulag. |
October 13th, 2017 | #7 |
Intellijintly Dezined
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
|
Kreashun Syence
...true, especially since almost all school textbooks come out of Texas...we can't get Jesus out of the Science section, let alone put Lucy in her proper perspective.
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier |
October 13th, 2017 | #8 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 99
|
Quote:
You guys are exhibiting the same behavior as Christians who have "scientific proof" of our planet being 6000 years old. They completely disregard the overwhelming evidence in favor of an argument and embrace the improbable. Next you create an echo chamber, if 10 people make an improbable claim it has to be probable. If you guys really believe Out of Africa is false you seriously need to analyze your thinking process and fix it. If you can't, maybe leave the thinking to someone who can. |
|
October 13th, 2017 | #9 | |
Intellijintly Dezined
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
|
Quote:
If you feel it is an echo chamber of an incorrect assertion, you must prove up why it is incorrect. Declarations that others are 'all kinds of wrong' is not Science. Firstly, do you realize that the conditions to create a fossil are the reason fossilization still gives us an incomplete record? The conditions have to be present and are very specific. Lucy was found, as the conditions were present when this creature died to have her remains fossilized. ...But now we have OLDER links to the human species, and the anthropologist quoted in the OP Article, although he would not say it was certain, as that's not how Scientific theories come to be--must test against your finding first--said himself the question must be posed as to whether the former theory will be shown true, false, or different in some way than what is the current narrative. So he questions the Out of Africa narrative, and he is not a White Nationalist. ...and further, the article Alex posted was pulled. Interesting. Click the link: http://www.newsweek.com/first-homini...olution-613494 Wonder why they have a problem with a new discovery that questions the Nigger Mama of the World theory?
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier |
|
October 13th, 2017 | #10 |
Intellijintly Dezined
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
|
S'more Evidence that Conflicts with the Out of Africa theory
From sources who aren't White Nationalists, btw.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...ca-theory-out/ --This one mentions the discoveries in Greece and Bulgaria, as the pulled story did: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2...ientists-find/ ^^Oldest ape-like creature with human teeth, in Europe, 7.2 Million years old. "..The discovery of the creature, named Graecopithecus freybergi, and nicknameded ‘El Graeco' by scientists, proves our ancestors were already starting to evolve in Europe 200,000 years before the earliest African hominid. An international team of researchers say the findings entirely change the beginning of human*history and place the last common ancestor of both chimpanzees and humans - the so-called Missing Link - in the Mediterranean region..." Bulgaria, Greece, Spain. Older than the nig. Not figured out by anyone with ties to racial politics whatsoever, it is an unbiased finding. What shows bias is how slow to update the official narrative amongst the media and textbook creators.
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier |
October 13th, 2017 | #11 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 99
|
Quote:
I said Out of Africa is a genetic fact, then you begin rambling about fossils. Genetics trump fossils. |
|
October 13th, 2017 | #12 | |
Intellijintly Dezined
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
|
Rolf v. 'Lightweight' Anthropologist Cole...I'm going with Cole
Quote:
"..We discovered 13 million variants and, of those variants, greater than 3 million are completely novel, meaning that they have not been reported in any database. The current public database has 40 million variants. So we found 3 million novel variants by simply sequencing 15 individuals. That increases by about 8 percent all known human genetic variation. It also demonstrates that we're missing a lot of really important variation that's out there.." ^^Also from Scientific American, admitting they don't know where 3 million plus variants come from. I know it's hard to read six paragraphs, but if you try you might can do it. Like you do with your religion: just believe. Re bold: it's "would suffice". But it's cute when you try and skool meh. Bless your little heart.
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier Last edited by Emily Henderson; October 13th, 2017 at 07:45 PM. |
|
October 13th, 2017 | #13 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 99
|
Quote:
Of course now the big question, since all of you are wrong about Out of Africa, because you ignore 99 pieces of evidence while choosing to believe 1 piece of evidence, am I to take anything you say seriously? And trust me, Out of Africa can be settled with 3 simple pictures, and a toddler could look at these pictures and correctly and conclusively determine that Out of Africa is correct. So right now you guys are operating at a level comparable to retardation. I will of course provide this picture evidence at a later point, but I'm curious about the reactions. Is there a point in a discussion forum if most of the contributors are unable to distinguish fact from fiction? |
|
October 13th, 2017 | #14 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 179
|
Quote:
|
|
October 14th, 2017 | #15 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 99
|
I applaud your brevity.
I encourage everyone to either thumb down or thumb up my post in support of "Out of Africa", see if we can get a head count for this social experiment. Next I'll try to explain why Out of Africa is correct, and we'll see which percentage is willing to admit being wrong. |
October 14th, 2017 | #16 |
Jeunesse Dorée
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Four Seasons Jalalabad
Posts: 9,750
|
Come on Rolf, let´s see what you have. I´ve got a feeling that Emily is going to shred your ass.
__________________
_______ Political correctness is an intellectual gulag. |
October 14th, 2017 | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,156
|
|
October 15th, 2017 | #18 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 242
|
Rolf sounds a bit worried, he would have been one of the people that claimed that the earth is flat and that witches must be burned. Maybe he will accept new findings once his Jewish prof approved of them. Hang in there, Rolf.
|
October 15th, 2017 | #19 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 99
|
That's like claiming that because you have blue eyes you have no genetic markers associated with Africa. Fortunately Out of Africa is very simple. So far 7 people have signed up for class.
|
October 15th, 2017 | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,156
|
Better than 85% of the population has a genetic marker shared with the Rhesus monkey. Those with Rhesus D negative blood do not have that shared genetic marker. Science has not a reasonable explanation for the RH- blood types. How is it you believe we have an association or origin from Afreaka?
I do believe you may have originated in Afreaka though. |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|