Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old June 2nd, 2017 #101
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

only sharia gets at the level of severity needed, but again, mutatis mutandis, hence the white part. which none of the critics take into account, blinded with horror by literal-minded gaping at SHARIA.

what are you going to say? law and order? not strong enough. conservatives have made hollow easter bunnies of our public decorum.

WHITE SHARIA works
 
Old June 2nd, 2017 #102
Dominus
Senior Member
 
Dominus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Serbia
Posts: 809
Default

The family and social life worked quite well in Third Reich without any kind of sandnigger ideology/elements/ideas. The difference between now and then is that back then men were MEN and today men are pussies. Also, back then women behaved like WOMEN, embraced motherhood, household etc. Today these natural values are demonized by the kikes through feminism.
 
Old June 3rd, 2017 #103
Crowe
Senior Member
 
Crowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stronza View Post
I don't know if you were referring to circumcision when you said the above. But if you were, this is not an "internal family dispute" any more than a decision to take a daughter to a doctor to have some sort of genital cutting done. As happens millions of times a year over in those dark lands.
What is your point? I clearly stated that circumcision isn't a matter of personal choice, and that it's child mutilation that should be punishable by penalty of death. Female circumcision is just as barbaric, and should be equally punishable. I don't think anyone here supports any form of circumcision. If anyone thinks it's a good idea to get their kid's penis kosher slaughtered, then they must be pretty fucked up in the head, or are a witless dupe in a jewish system.

I can't think of too many other scenarios where a court would have to get involved outside of disputes during and after a divorce.

As far as who the courts side with in a patriarchy, well under the current system men are the ones who get the raw deal. When it comes to custody disputes and payment of child support and even dividing up assets after a divorce. Men almost always, 90% of the time get the bullshit deal.

I say if the man works, and the women doesn't, custody of the kids should go to the man by default. Or whoever is individually more capable financially. Excluding other scenarios like if the man is proven to be an abusive alcoholic, or is mentally unstable. In which case he might have to pay child support. The same could be said for the mother, maybe she's a slut who brings a different guy home every weekend? Does anyone think she should get custody of kids?

When it comes to property, it should be as simple as this: If you owned it before the marriage, it stays yours after the marriage.
__________________
Low-IQ bible scholars are legion, the big book o' bullshit is catnip to the underbrained. --ALEX LINDER
 
Old June 3rd, 2017 #104
Stronza
Senior Member
 
Stronza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,498
Default

Are you talking about some edenic future white society when you say these things? What do we do in the meantime?

When it comes to property, it should be as simple as this: If you owned it before the marriage, it stays yours after the marriage.

I guess you were not aware - or do not care - that a farmer (usually, but other situations, also) could marry a woman, she could bear a large number of his children and work like an animal inside and outside the house as well as take care of the children, and then when hubby dear decides years later he wants a more attractive specimen to raise the ol' flagpole, he could kick his wife and mother of his children out of the home, leaving her and the kids penniless. And that is why laws were put into place to prevent this kind of nastiness. Christian charitable organizations had so much on their plate, dealing with these men, so this was politicians' excuse to get involved in family matters.

Also, such men have been known to disinherit the wife in their wills, just because they were bastards who think a woman does not deserve to have anything. In other words, women were slaves in some men's eyes.

Were some undeserving wives receiving 50% of a man's property upon divorce? Yes, indeed. It still happens; we all know of such cases.

Whether the above scenarios happened a few times, or many times, is irrelevant. We are a fallen people, mean and ignorant in countless ways, so the law tried to compensate for that. Undoubtedly, the parties bringing these legal protections for wives and children had ulterior motives, but if white men had good judgment in the selection of a wife, and treated the woman as if she were a human, there'd be no need for wife-protection laws. All men now have to pay the price for the perfidy of a few in the not-too-distant past. That's the story of how we got to where we are.

I'm done. Stick a fork in me if you like.
 
Old June 3rd, 2017 #105
Dawn Cannon
Senior Member
 
Dawn Cannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The Vampire Ball
Posts: 6,409
Default

Quote:
When it comes to property, it should be as simple as this: If you owned it before the marriage, it stays yours after the marriage.
Somewhat off topic, but in Islamic law, for example, a married woman was permitted to retain any property that she owned.

The wife's property and earnings are under her full control and for her use alone since her, and the children's, maintenance is her husband's responsibility.
http://www.islamweb.net/en/article/1...ights-of-women


No Financial Responsibility:
A woman in Islam does not shoulder any financial obligations; it is the man who shoulders this responsibility in the family. It is the duty of the father or the brother, before she is married to look after her lodging, boarding, clothing and financial aspects, and it becomes the duty of her husband or her son, after she is married.
 
Old June 3rd, 2017 #106
cillian
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,377
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dawn Cannon View Post
Somewhat off topic, but in Islamic law, for example, a married woman was permitted to retain any property that she owned.

The wife's property and earnings are under her full control and for her use alone since her, and the children's, maintenance is her husband's responsibility.
http://www.islamweb.net/en/article/1...ights-of-women


No Financial Responsibility:
A woman in Islam does not shoulder any financial obligations; it is the man who shoulders this responsibility in the family. It is the duty of the father or the brother, before she is married to look after her lodging, boarding, clothing and financial aspects, and it becomes the duty of her husband or her son, after she is married.
That's also why they have dowries, should the husband die or otherwise be unable to provide, she still has her own money, by selling a piece of her jewelry.
 
Old June 3rd, 2017 #107
Dawn Cannon
Senior Member
 
Dawn Cannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The Vampire Ball
Posts: 6,409
Default

White Shia

THAT would piss off ALL of the White genocide corporations/alliances.



 
Old June 3rd, 2017 #108
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,399
Blog Entries: 8
Default

Are we ready for White Ramadan too?

Introducing White Ramadan

https://www.counter-currents.com/201...white-ramadan/
 
Old June 3rd, 2017 #109
Dawn Cannon
Senior Member
 
Dawn Cannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The Vampire Ball
Posts: 6,409
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie Key View Post
Are we ready for White Ramadan too?

Introducing White Ramadan

https://www.counter-currents.com/201...white-ramadan/

Yes, already do

(as opposed to moslem quasi-religious nonsense of stuffing your fat face inbetween sunset and sunrise)

https://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=433464

.

Last edited by Dawn Cannon; June 3rd, 2017 at 12:08 PM.
 
Old June 3rd, 2017 #110
Crowe
Senior Member
 
Crowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
Default

Society is primarily a racial construct, regardless of what religion the said society is. Some people want to split hairs, b....bu.....but!! Islam is non-White! Well, so is Christianity. Both in its origin and in the % of non-White Christians outnumbering White Christians. That doesn't mean there aren't some good points to be taken from either.
__________________
Low-IQ bible scholars are legion, the big book o' bullshit is catnip to the underbrained. --ALEX LINDER
 
Old June 3rd, 2017 #111
Olaf Menes
Senior Member
 
Olaf Menes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 831
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stronza View Post
Are you talking about some edenic future white society when you say these things? What do we do in the meantime?

When it comes to property, it should be as simple as this: If you owned it before the marriage, it stays yours after the marriage.

I guess you were not aware - or do not care - that a farmer (usually, but other situations, also) could marry a woman, she could bear a large number of his children and work like an animal inside and outside the house as well as take care of the children, and then when hubby dear decides years later he wants a more attractive specimen to raise the ol' flagpole, he could kick his wife and mother of his children out of the home, leaving her and the kids penniless. And that is why laws were put into place to prevent this kind of nastiness. Christian charitable organizations had so much on their plate, dealing with these men, so this was politicians' excuse to get involved in family matters.
Substantial property don't stay with a man no matter if the woman was penniless before marriage.

That is Feminist propaganda bullshit. The fact is that such a scenario was exceptionally rare in a full patriarchal society, because culture boundaries from relatives and community would outcast such a man as a total piece of shit and shunned within a healthy White society.

Feminism ushered in the disruption of the traditional White household. Women found out that over time, THEY were the ones who will end up with the farm and kids, while that "Man" does not even have to commit infidelity,or any kind of serious abuse or actions,and is exiled into a life of having the majority of his earnings taken and spent with no financial oversight, by a "Modern" woman's Rights" who then turns whore and
bangs multiple dudes in front of her children.

The reason I say this is how many women want to get involved with a Man who has 2/3 of his income taken for alimony and child support?

Yet how many shit bag men will shack up with some whore who has a free ride with monthly child support checks?

Again we can see why White birthrates have plummeted.

More often than not, Women have been awarded by the Jew maelstrom, embracing feminism, awarded with judicial favoritism. I have yet to see any significant numbers of men awarded controlling custody of children, even when their wives are drugged out skanky whores. The system loves that outcome, they WANT BASTARDS RAISED by the state with no strong father figure to dominate the principles of children.

The fact is, Men are still men, but the feminist award system castrates any man behaving like a man.
 
Old June 3rd, 2017 #112
Olaf Menes
Senior Member
 
Olaf Menes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 831
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowe View Post
b....bu.....but!! Islam is non-White! Well, so is Christianity. Both in its origin and in the % of non-White Christians outnumbering White Christians. That doesn't mean there aren't some good points to be taken from either.
Uh ya, it does mean that anyone White who did not learn from what happened after Christianity was adopted into European Culture,and too stupid to understand the atrocity of religious assimilation, should be bricked in the fucking head for wanting to try that again with another Semitic religion.
 
Old June 4th, 2017 #113
Crowe
Senior Member
 
Crowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Olaf Menes View Post
Uh ya, it does mean that anyone White who did not learn from what happened after Christianity was adopted into European Culture,and too stupid to understand the atrocity of religious assimilation, should be bricked in the fucking head for wanting to try that again with another Semitic religion.
Don't misconstrue my statements. This isn't about twisting up a fucking turban and wearing it on your head, and praying to Allah. It's about being emotionally stable enough to see good points in something, even though as a whole it's bad.

If a group like FEMEN or Pussy Riot was to go to a Muslim country, their entire coterie of misfits would be dangling as crane ornaments . That's how Muslims deal with this sorta thing. They've managed to inoculate themselves from many (((western))) cultural perversions by enforcing steep punishments for this kinda stuff. Islam also has laws pertaining to usury that are pretty strict. Which is one of the main problems we got in the West is where jew banks are making a bloody killing and have stuffed their coffers with these methods for the last several hundred years. They then used this money to buy nations. It can't be ignored that it was mostly Muslim countries who held out the longest, when White civilization was the first to fall to the jew menace. There is something we can learn from them.

Some of the commandments in Christianity are legitimately good laws, even though they didn't invent these laws which they take credit for inventing, it's still an integral part of their religion that's not necessarily bad.

Here is my point about society being primarily a racial construct:



Niggers are going to be niggers regardless of if they're Muslim or Christian.

This is also true for Whites. Not that cooky religions can't retard cultural development, but Whites still drove the cutting edge of culture and technological development, even while carrying semitic baggage around.
__________________
Low-IQ bible scholars are legion, the big book o' bullshit is catnip to the underbrained. --ALEX LINDER

Last edited by Crowe; June 4th, 2017 at 04:31 AM.
 
Old June 4th, 2017 #114
Dominus
Senior Member
 
Dominus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Serbia
Posts: 809
Default

"white sharia", "white ramadan", "white quran"

Through history my nation learned how to embrace those things and the best way to embrace them is this:





Of course we should not forget to embrace all that through some good "white halal" food.


Last edited by Dominus; June 4th, 2017 at 11:02 AM.
 
Old June 8th, 2017 #115
majorlee
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 130
Default

Quote:
I'm not sure about that. Weimar Germany in the 20's was pretty damn similar to what we're experiencing now in the West. Berlin was full of faggots, dykes, trannies, pedophiles, drug-addicts, child-exploitation rings, gay bars, prostitution everywhere, etc. Hitler and the Nazis were able to clean all that up and straighten things out. They turned a complete Sodom & Gomorrah style cesspit into a beautiful, clean, healthy, nationalist society without resorting to any desert-monkey Sharia garbage.
I agree 100%. Hitler gave us the blueprint to clean up our country as he did his. All we have to do is wake up enough people and get active to get things moving in that direction.
 
Old June 8th, 2017 #116
zoomcopter
Senior Member
 
zoomcopter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The goyim reservation
Posts: 5,944
Blog Entries: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by majorlee View Post
I agree 100%. Hitler gave us the blueprint to clean up our country as he did his. All we have to do is wake up enough people and get active to get things moving in that direction.
Good point. There are two blueprints up on the wall, one Talmudic and one Teutonic. One leading to racial annihilation and the other leading to eternal salvation.

Eternal damnation versus Eternal salvation, the choice is ours to make.
__________________
Vladimir Putin's Russia is being attacked by the very same forces that attacked Hitler's Germany, namely the Jews. The fate of the world hangs on Putin defeating the Jews.
 
Old June 8th, 2017 #117
zoomcopter
Senior Member
 
zoomcopter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The goyim reservation
Posts: 5,944
Blog Entries: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie Key View Post
Are we ready for White Ramadan too?

Introducing White Ramadan

https://www.counter-currents.com/201...white-ramadan/
White Ramadan rocks

Funny how memes evolve and take on a life of their own...
__________________
Vladimir Putin's Russia is being attacked by the very same forces that attacked Hitler's Germany, namely the Jews. The fate of the world hangs on Putin defeating the Jews.
 
Old June 9th, 2017 #118
Sean Gruber
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,465
Default

White sharia isn't sharia. That's why white is placed in front of it.

It's there to get you to think about making our own (white) type of patriarchy.

Imagine objecting to the name "Daily Stormer" because "German nationalism is too parochial. What about Hungarian Whites? What if I'm allergic to bratwurst?"

The levels of cluelessness are off the charts in this thread.

The most risible lines so far:

-- "women in mammals always choose their own partner based on fitness" (a statement compacted with error) therefore thot-control is still marginally preferable to a functioning traditional society

-- "joke or not, we don't need anything from those camel-fuckers"

and (Dunning–Kruger Medal winner)

-- "I'm amongst the most intelligent here," than which no statement more neatly proves its opposite
__________________
No jews, just right

Less talk, more action

Last edited by Sean Gruber; June 9th, 2017 at 10:26 AM. Reason: clarity
 
Old June 9th, 2017 #119
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,679
Default

Women are whores who need to be smacked and controlled. If we as Europeans are not going to do it niggers and other vermin will.

The degenerate white bitch gets off on it


Beat the Thots to a bloody pulp! White Sharia NOW!!!
__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race


''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers
 
Old June 10th, 2017 #120
carl_sebastian
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Hadaway View Post
Female sexual selection results in a few males having sex with almost all the females while the majority get's more and more desperate.

There's nothing wrong with nudity in art. But there is something wrong with objectifying the human body, as you're reducing it to sterility and that is part of what is causing us to be displaced in the countries we built.
You are not entitled to food, shelter, water or pussy for simply existing, only 50% of the males spreading their dna would be an improvement but i would actually prefer even more brutal female sexual selection

Proof the body is the most important factor in female sexual selection https://m.youtube.com/user/FACEandLMS

Complaining about humans being objectified is actually retarded but i can understand unattractive people are upset that they are not viewed as sexual objects. Humans are physical objects with conscuousness just like other animals, humans are a part of nature.

Solutions for males being rejected:
-porn
-gay sex
-prostitutes
-masturbation
-strip clubs.
-suidice.
-going breivik.
 
Reply

Tags
dei lex, lex naturae, patriarchy, white sharia law

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:08 AM.
Page generated in 0.49377 seconds.