|
July 13th, 2008 | #621 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 535
|
Quote:
Do you really imagine you're going to go where no Jew has gone before and actually prove something that has thus far only been alleged? Are you a better Jew than all previous/other Jews? Perhaps you're the one, the Messianic 'Caust Enforcer; the title kind of suits you. Regards, the Furious Reverend.
__________________
Fear not the path of truth for the lack of those upon it.
|
|
July 13th, 2008 | #622 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Sorry, I missed this post:
Quote:
It has nothing to do with the level of detail that an examining judge's site investigation report on the physical evidence must comply with. Two different pairs of boots, so please try again. As to Krege's qualification to testify as an expert before a court of law on the subject matter of his "forensic examination", I guess Slanim has already said what needs to be said. Quote:
And while our discussion is of course not a court of law, we should be clear among ourselves according to what rules of evidence we assess the evidence we look at. The disciplines assessing evidence for the purpose of reconstructing events past and proving them beyond a reasonable doubt are historical research and criminal justice, so either of them should be our guideline here. Criminal justice applies the stricter standards, at least under a constitutional state's legal system, because a citizen's life or freedom is at issue. [Posted on 14-07-2008 at 0:17 GMT under http://206.41.117.128/newreply.php?do=postreply&t=73168 ] |
||
July 13th, 2008 | #623 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 535
|
Quote:
What does pride mean to you? What is the difference between a German, proud and not?
__________________
Fear not the path of truth for the lack of those upon it.
|
|
July 13th, 2008 | #624 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Sorry, Gerdes, but this: Quote:
I neither saw it in your post # 495, in which you first announced the "bonus". Nor was in your posts nos. 513, 543, 557 and 590, in which you repeated/updated the new wording of the challenge requirements. Did you add it this afternoon, after I had already accepted the challenge according to the NAFCASH conditions as amended according to these posts? That’s real cute. And so is the babbling about the contracts between your "association" and the supporters of the challenge. What is an applicant to the reward to know about these contracts, and why should an applicant to the reward care about them? The only conditions that are of interest between NAFCASH and the applicant are those that are agreed between these two. It’s also interesting to know that the challenge may disappear from one moment to the other, and that meeting the challenge requirements doesn’t guarantee receiving the reward but makes one a claimant only. What this means is "If you meet the challenge requirements with evidence published in ARCHAEOLOGY or SKEPTIC magazine, we may (not will) pay you the reward", isn’t it? These conditions alone make it seem rather unsurprising that I – from what I have gathered – am the first applicant. I wasn’t even concerned about "locking in" the amount, by the way. What I want to see "locked in", and I think I expressed myself clearly enough in this respect, are the requirements as currently stipulated: Requirements for the main reward: Quote:
Mass grave must be from Sobibor + applicant (from limited number of named individuals) must furthermore «prove that Sobibors alleged “giant pile of human ash” is actually composed of human ash». Are these unchangeable "fundamental requirements of laying claim to the reward offered" in the sense of your above-quoted addition, Mr. Gerdes? If they are, I have no further questions. So please confirm that they are, again by e-mail to [email protected] The hysterical gibberish in your posts nos. 616 to 619 (the usual collection of nonsensical assertions and the staple Gerdian invective – calling his opponents cowards to cover up his own blatant cowardice, liars to cover up his own blatant mendacity, and homosexuals to cover up his own apparent homosexual tendencies) I will not dignify by detailed comments, I might as well comment a drunken beer-hall bum’s incoherent verbal vomit. Just one part that particularly amused me, from post # 619: Quote:
|
||||
July 13th, 2008 | #625 | |||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Any more contributions? Oh yeah: Quote:
Quote:
The not-so-proud one prefers to mind his own business. |
|||||
July 13th, 2008 | #626 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 535
|
Quote:
Kangaroo courts that use fallacious terminology such as "reasonably indisputable" should be considered enemy territory. The war of perception is waged in these bogus, predetermined scenarios.
__________________
Fear not the path of truth for the lack of those upon it.
|
|
July 13th, 2008 | #627 |
gassed at least 5 times
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Wolzek (get it?)
Posts: 1,176
|
I see Gerdes has moved the goal posts on the reward. What an ass.
__________________
RabbitNoMore But all jews do speak in absolutes though. Just like you. ----------- Define idiot |
July 13th, 2008 | #628 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 660
|
I had a great weekend ... but still there isn't a gassed jew from either Roberto or his sycophant. I expected that. After all, it has been over 65 years and not a single gassed jew has ever been produced.
|
July 14th, 2008 | #629 | |
Pussy Bünd "Commander"
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: land of the Friedman, home of the Braverman
Posts: 13,329
|
Quote:
Go figure!
__________________
Worse than a million megaHitlers all smushed together. |
|
July 14th, 2008 | #630 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
July 14th, 2008 | #631 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Shit, I knew I had forgotten something. I should have flown to Poland over the weekend, dug out a body in wax-fat transformation from the bottom of a Belzec or Sobibor mass grave and had it examined by an expert in forensic medicine. Maybe signs of carbon monoxide poisoning or suffocation are detectable in a 65-year-old rotten stiff.
|
July 14th, 2008 | #632 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
|
July 14th, 2008 | #633 | ||
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 535
|
Quote:
Quote:
This "it is simply a fact" standard is a standard that protects who?
__________________
Fear not the path of truth for the lack of those upon it.
|
||
July 14th, 2008 | #634 | |
Pussy Bünd "Commander"
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: land of the Friedman, home of the Braverman
Posts: 13,329
|
Quote:
__________________
Worse than a million megaHitlers all smushed together. Last edited by MikeTodd; July 14th, 2008 at 10:22 AM. |
|
July 14th, 2008 | #635 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Isn't it just hilarious watching Roberta cry like a little girl over the fact she can't alter the conditions of the nafcash challenge to her liking?
Only a jew... Roberta: "These conditions alone make it seem rather unsurprising that I – from what I have gathered – am the first applicant." You are not an "applicant." You haven't "applied" for anything. One cannot become an applicant / claimant unless and until your alleged "proof" is published in said magazines. You have only made a public statement that you were accepting THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE. You can apply / lay claim to the reward when, again, your alleged "proof" is published in said magazines. Roberta: "Did you add it this afternoon, after I had already accepted the challenge according to the NAFCASH conditions as amended according to these posts?" There has been no amending Roberta. All the very simple things that I’ve had to spell out for you was simply done because of the fact that you are so stupid that I have to explain the most elementary things to you that most normal people of normal intelligence would have understood to be self evident. Clarifying self evident information for a mentally retarded / ill person can only be defined as adding / modifying by a person of very limited intelligence and/or someone suffering from sever mental illness / brain damage. But thanks for parading you stupidity here again. It's always a pleasure to see you flaunt not only your mental illness but your stupidly as well. Also note: Roberta's deafening silence on the videos of Chelmno and Sobibor. BTW Roberta, what camp are you going to use? Have you heard from Shermer yet? Have you gotten a hold of OJ? |
July 14th, 2008 | #636 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Roberta:
"The mass graves at Sobibor seem to have been identified by core drilling rather than excavation" Can you prove this? Can you show us one single photo of Kola drilling a core? Can you show us one single photo of the core samples taken? And notice how Roberta just admitted that Kola lied when he said he had done excavations at Sobibor. And BTW Roberta, how much human remains have been excavated to date from the "enormous pit filled with human bones" at Chelmno? Have you heard from Archaeology magazine yet? Have you heard from jew-lie-t Golden yet? |
July 14th, 2008 | #637 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
FYI Roberta, I am currently working on the next nafcash update that will continue to simplify and clarify the issues surrounding the nonsensical "pure extermination center" myth and the fraudulent claims that they have been proven via archeological excavations.
Rest your damaged little brain about the bonus Sobibor reward, as that will most certainly be included. I will also address the issue of how long a certain reward requirement, once posted on the site, will be made available for someone to adequately research and lay claim to. However, I think the next update will boil things down to the point that it will be so simple and straightforward, that even a retard like you should be able to understand it. What I will do is get things to the point - and express - that only minor changes can be made between certain dates - something like locking in certain requirements / reward amounts for a specified length of time. In other words, giving you the guarantee that things wont' change from moment to moment. The whole process of updating the nafcash site as well as the contracts has been streamlined so it shouldn't be too long to wait for the updated information to get completed and uploaded. |
July 14th, 2008 | #638 |
gassed at least 5 times
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Wolzek (get it?)
Posts: 1,176
|
Yep, and his weaselness will no doubt change it again.
__________________
RabbitNoMore But all jews do speak in absolutes though. Just like you. ----------- Define idiot |
July 14th, 2008 | #639 | |
Member
|
Slammin, never have I come across a jew that is so incapable of basic reading comprehension; either or, more likely you well understand Herr Gerdes last post - which has NOTHING to do with you at all - and, would insist to behave as jews do, ie, in your case, making feeble attempt at wit - something that jews, as a whole, singularly lack to the degree that they should not even make attempt at it.
I will repost Herr Gerdes statement here, for you to study for a few hours; perhaps you might get the jist of it. Quote:
|
|
July 14th, 2008 | #640 |
gassed at least 5 times
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Wolzek (get it?)
Posts: 1,176
|
I thought I heard some tapping, did our Hitler worshiper leave anything behind besides her usual turds?
__________________
RabbitNoMore But all jews do speak in absolutes though. Just like you. ----------- Define idiot |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|