Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old October 18th, 2014 #181
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Donnie in Ohio View Post
I'm no expert on National Socialism, that's for sure. I was under the impression that Hitler considered it uniquely German, or at least his definition of "Aryan". Very well could be wrong about that.
I don't know...he reached out to Japan and pretty much all kinds of other ethnic groups. It's just nationalism. Which particular feature of it isn't reproducible? It's just typical big-government social engineering but from a racial POV rather than a communist/anti-white one like FDR. I suppose it was unusual in how he got out from under international banking, but that's not something that others couldn't copy too.

Quote:
Here in America, I know the arguments. That symbols don't matter, that you can get people to rally under any symbol, including the swastika.

I don't disagree. You can get a large majority of the white population to do/say/believe just about anything if you have the power that comes with mass propaganda that starts very early in life. White children today are nothing other than flat-out indoctrinated by the public (and private) educational system in 2014. Brainwashed is another word you could use. Examples abound. They're documented all over the forum.
Yes. I used to push those anti-NS clown arguments but then I realized, hell we live in a clown nation. No one reads, so they don't know history. All they know is what's on tv. There's lots of retro, not much genuinely new except in technology. So there's no reason to write off, really, any approach a priori. I could see anything working, in terms of dress or symbols. Where there's less room to operate is in choosing the guiding principles. There, mixing with conservatism will render our racial cause stillborn. That's my contention. In practice, WN are too willing to mix with jews and conservatives, because they're weak, they're amiable, and they don't see the danger in it and damage it causes.

Quote:
A group could adopt every single principle of National Socialism but call their system something else, use different symbols and they would have a much easier time getting through initially without the Pavlovian response National Socialism and its symbols engender from a good portion of the white population, at least at this time.
Maybe, but could also say the jews have done the work to publicize the swastika. If they're going to treat you like you wear it anyway, even if you're a wussy conservative, then where's the damage in wearing it? It's just not that big a deal. But really, how much imagination does it take to come up with a WN uniform, a simple one, not a formal one, at the start, and a new symbol? It's not that hard.

Quote:
In 25 years, after everyone connected to WWII in any capacity is long dead, the "Bad boy" image that has been used to portray National Socialist since roughly 1939 might actually be an asset.
I just think the right principles matter more than dress/symbols - provided they are adhered to.
 
Old October 18th, 2014 #182
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie Key View Post
Notice how he ignores my examples of Rounder and Chester Doles, for whom this forum raised more money than his southern clowns could dream of.

His basic lack of integrity is why I don't deal with him directly or post at his site. He simply can't be trusted. He is going to burn a lot of people before all is said and done. He has never faced any actual pressure, and foolishly believes this is because he is doing things right, instead of because he isn't pushing anything that threatens the System. He has simply taken the foolish conservative ideas being pushed by the Benny & Gordy show, because that's the circle he operates in at the moment.

Those associating with Wholesome Brad, the Gummiest of Bois, should be prepared for tearful recantings on the couch of the SPLC he associates with. What he says today about WN he can just as easily say about SN or the racial cause tomorrow. People don't change. Almost never. Wholesome Brad is just the octopus pretending to be a rock. (watch very end part -
)

Notice also, for all his fake-conservatism, he allows his commenters to defame my character with baseless lies - something that is against the rules here. VNN is firm on politics and rules. Gladhanding bullshit conservatism is all the jews-are-welcome CCC picnic clowns have to offer.
 
Old October 18th, 2014 #183
Chad Wentworth
Senior Member
 
Chad Wentworth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Romania
Posts: 1,558
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
I don't really understand what you're saying.

Codreanu - some of his boys turned themselves in after an action knowing they'd be killed and tortured. And they were.



Codreanu's attitude is not correct, either, altho often cited by WN. You could have a healthy christian society, and jews will prosper in it, and be able to split it apart. Perhaps this is what you're saying. Why? Because christianity contains no principle against judaism. Nor anything to safeguard white-racialness. that tells me, but not codreanu that xtianity and racialism dont go together. Why try to square a circle? It wastes your time and annoys the circle.
And in a later development, at the time of the communist imprisonment and persecution of his followers, the catchphrase of those who found comfort in jeboo was "do not avenge us". They looked to stoically resist the torture and make it go away with jeboo pills. That while some took up arms and started a guerrilla war against the communists. Out of these two attitudes, the first one prevails among the followers of the Iron Guard today.

Parrot and Heimbach swallowed that hook, line and sinker.

Quote:
After the establishment of the communist regime, he was arrested on August 30, 1946, tried as a war criminal, and sentenced on October 9, 1946 to 8 years in prison. Incarcerated in Aiud prison, he died after 6 years, due to the harsh treatment he was subjected to. Fellow prisoners told the story of his death: he and a group of 12 other convicts form his cell were all punished to stay naked, without any clothes or chairs, in a very cold and wet cavern in the prison's dungeon, for reciting poetry (poetry was very popular in prisons that communists used to condemn people just for being intellectuals; it was one of the few resorts of resisting the mental torture). A young man fell to the floor, risking to die of a lung disease, and Mircea Vulcănescu practically forced him to stay on top of him, rather than on the wet stone floor, and thus saved his life. He said: "I'm an old man, how can I let a young man like you die?".[citation needed] Yet he was only 48, an age many do not regard as "old". Soon after this, the young man was better, but Mircea Vulcănescu developed pneumonia, and soon after he died. His last words to the world were: "Do not avenge us!"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mircea_Vulc%C4%83nescu

Last edited by Chad Wentworth; October 18th, 2014 at 10:45 AM.
 
Old October 18th, 2014 #184
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Armor View Post
Today, thanks to the work of the revisionists, the Jewish story seems to be that the holocaust of the Jews by the Germans was a secret operation. That is supposed to explain why no shred of evidence was left. If so, it is wrong to blame the Germans and National Socialism for what was secretly done by only a handful of them. It amounts to racial defamation. Killing Jews was not consubstantial to National Socialism. For example, when you see old pictures of German crowds acclaiming Hitler, you know their enthusiasm had nothing to do with killing Jews. By comparison, the mass murders committed by the Jews in the USSR were not secret operations carried out by a tiny minority of Jews, and they were documented in a number of Western newspapers at the time. The Jews in the West knew about it and still supported their murderous cousins in the East. And the Jewish participation in the mass murder was not a top down operation. They were not simply obeying orders.
Very nice.

Quote:
About Greg Johnson: what doesn't make sense is that he seems to think it is possible to defend aspects of National Socialism without first debunking the holocaust story.
He could see this, but he's allowing himself to be influenced by others like KM and JT and Vdare.

The key in this stuff is to show strength. When you run away from stuff you yourself admit is baseless (ie, the revisionists have proved jews are lying about every essential element of the 'h'), what you convey to people is not "we are a new and improved detergent" but "we are weak and easily intimidated." Johnson doesn't seem to understand how things work in the real world. Hence he's always misplacing his trust in individuals who don't deserve it, and then beating his chest with regret later on. It's very girl-y, but it's his pattern.
 
Old October 18th, 2014 #185
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Donnie in Ohio View Post
I'm no expert on National Socialism, that's for sure. I was under the impression that Hitler considered it uniquely German, or at least his definition of "Aryan". Very well could be wrong about that.
Purely because you've seen that "not for export" quote a million times. That's the only reason. And it turns out that quote is wrong. Deliberately used to mean the opposite of what Hitler believed. Similar to the way the jew/con liars claim Hitler supported gun control.

If we think about it - what part of NS can't be copied by any other nation?
 
Old October 18th, 2014 #186
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Armor View Post
The vanguard/mainstream distinction is ambiguous:

Vanguard = radical? small elite? intellectual? explicit?

Mainstream = watered down? big masses? low brow? implicit?
Just a bunch of silly adjectives. Not worth worrying about. The WN position is normal; why help jews by calling their sex- and race-perversions 'mainstream' just because they have the power to widely circulate them?

Quote:
On the one hand, you have normal, wholesome, slightly stupid masses of White people who think no harm, don't know anything about the Jew, and simply want to go on living their peaceful lives as White people.
Whites are basically a Lawrence Welk type people. Good as far as it goes, but incapable of protecting itself, as history shows, when it comes to jews. But this is the basic stock we're dealing with in America.

Quote:
On the other hand, you have the vanguardists who stick out as sore thumbs in the general population. And each time a man of the people becomes aware of ZOG, he stops being mainstream and becomes a vanguardist, and can be described as somewhat removed from normal White people. Such an analysis of the situation means that you refuse the idea that normal White people can have any political leaders to represent them. So, I think the vanguard/mainstream distinction is artificial and can be counterproductive. The real distinction should be between people who know about the Jew, and those who don't know yet, but will soon learn all about it thanks to our diligent efforts.
Red pill vs blue pill, lots of ways to put the concept. People get jews or they don't. What I'm fighting is this idea that our politics slides degree by degree into the mainstream. That's not an accurate model. It might work for the left, where the rule is "no enemies to the left," but not for the right, where you're seeing cravens and submissives compete for scraps. Ever see Pat Buchanan, the farthest right inside Club Permissible, give any credit to the revisionists who've done jail time? Heck no. Pat Buchanan doesn't see himself as part of a sliding scale with us in any way. He sees us, as all conservatives see us, as a market for his books. And as a producer of ideas that can sell them. If those ideas are carefully cleaned off, ie gelded of race or jew-criticism. This increases the conservative's fame, his public profile, his bank account, and if he does it skillfully, he keeps his booth inside Club Permissible.

Professional conservatives see WN as a sort of minor league they can steal ideas from and sell their gelded books to. It's all about their careers, not political change. This is why we should call them career girls, because their career is their #1 concern, and there is no #2. It's exactly the opposite with us.

What WN seem not to realize is that professional conservatives are much better positioned to profit off us, to use us and run, than we are to use them. We have to be jealous gods, and allow no others before us. We have to use them the best we can - and we should steal their points or formulations, while attacking them. We should be doing to them what they do to us. While always insisting on the huge distinction between racial loyalists and profiteering career girls. This is winning politics. If we tried it. But what we see among WN or race-flavored groups is they are more than willing to mix with conservatives. They have no principles at all - except, ironically, they won't mix with people who advocate what I do, which they denounce as puritanism. This willingness to mix with weak conservatives and to eschew any kind of principled approach is the strongest secondary reason WN hasn't gone aware. The first, of course, being jew-federal suppression of our organization (Doles's group, Rounder's party, Matt Hale, etc.).

Quote:
In his essay titled "Vanguardism, Vantardism, and Mainstreaming",
Funny how he carefully explained 'vantardism,' like no one has used it before, and like it's not self-evident what it means, since tard has been applied to every sector of the spectrum out there.

Quote:
Greg Johnson says that "our movement should aim to recruit Whites of all social classes who are above average in intelligence, virtue, and taste". I would simply say that we need to unite all Whites who stand against race-replacement.
Exactly. And particularly given the internet. Make what you do intelligent, funny, accessible to all. Use video and graphics. Use slurs. It is the eternal mistake of the PhD class to think that slurs and high spirits clash with intelligence. They are deformed by decades of ass-flattening in libraries and simply can't see that all that matters is basic honesty - when the writer says something is a fact, we the readers must be able to rely on him. If not, then his PhD doesn't matter. If so, then his PhD doesn't matter. If the basic honest and intelligence are there, then it's all about how good the writer is, no matter his politics. This should be obvious stuff, but it's not. PhDs simply aren't comfortable with non-PhDs. They do their scholarly stuff, and that has to be enough. The rest can use what they say, the journalists (notice how this is a low epithet to Johson, as he used it on me) and the popularizers. But these folks are more important than the PhDs, who after all are but formally proving the sky is blue.

The memes VNN has spread now dominate all sectors of the internet where free response is allowed. Do I overstate?

I think we ARE succeeding. I think the most important white political work out there IS being done on the Internet - at least in the US. With the exception of Greece, where conditions are much worse. We haven't done anything...except prime the pump and prepare the ground. That is not nothing, not by a long shot. It's better than selling out on race, as Marine Le Pen does, and as the jew-welcoming CCC/LOS do.

VNN virtually alone has stayed consistent in principles and approach from day one. Which other sites or people or groups can say that?

Quote:
Resisting our collective destruction by racial replacement is a sign of intelligence and moral strength. But we see a lot of smart and moral people who cannot resist the pressure of conformism as well as the pressure of government and media intimidation. They lack the courage and independence of mind. That is where the style of communication used by Anglin, Ransdell, and also Kyle Hunt, can be very useful and persuasive. It will not only work with half-witted proletarians. In fact, those three guys do much more than use words like kike and nigger, they rely a lot on logic and reason, like most opponents to the Jews. Their particular style can appeal to all kinds of people. The Jews, by comparison, completely ignore logic and reason, and are nevertheless able to sway intelligent people, thanks to their control of government and the media.
The PhDs can't understand, in their bones, that freedom and epithets go together and are NOT necessarily opposed to intelligence and honesty. White men who are afraid won't defend themselves. Who will deny that today whites are afraid? Epithets and mockery are what help get them over that fear, because humor expresses disdain, which shows a willingness to break taboos, but it is often the best way to make an argument - implicitly, as KM at least ought to know, since he loves that word. A nigger joke assumes what a Charles Murray or a Richard Flynn proves. It gets the point across to the audience without even needing to make it - it puts it through as an assumption, and if the other guy laughs, he accedes to the smuggled argument. If I say, what did the nigger get for Christmas: your bike! and you laugh, you are agreeing with the argument that niggers are prone to theft. You are a racist, whether you admit it or not. What is wrong with racism if it reflects reality? Nothing, obviously. But our religious cult tells us we're supposed to feel guilty about that sort of thing, it's not nice. We're supposed to help and save the negro, because we are our brother's keeper. Just the way we need jesus to help and save us. This is the warped mentation that has brought low our race and culture. But how many white men are willing to attack christianity also? Most WN are not.

VNN is the only place where the whole thing is done correctly. In that sense yes, we are the vanguard.
 
Old October 18th, 2014 #187
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chad Wentworth View Post
And in a later development, at the time of the communist imprisonment and persecution of his followers, the catchphrase of those who found comfort in jeboo was "do not avenge us". They looked to stoically resist the torture and make it go away with jeboo pills. That while some took up arms and started a guerrilla war against the communists. Out of these two attitudes, the first one prevails among the followers of the Iron Guard today.

Parrot and Heimbach swallowed that hook, line and sinker.
Yes, they're on that flatulent nonsense. I don't trust people who continually maunder on about consciences etc and flip religions and positions, embrace wacky foreign stuff with no connection to anything here. The whole approach reeks of instability and confusion. Race and jebus is a lousy combo. No matter which cool alt-cross you dangle between your man tits.

Last edited by Alex Linder; October 18th, 2014 at 11:57 AM.
 
Old October 18th, 2014 #188
zoomcopter
Senior Member
 
zoomcopter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The goyim reservation
Posts: 5,944
Blog Entries: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
Just tie it to the Holodomor. Explain NS as a reaction to jewish mass murder in Russia. I always say the Nazis were very afraid the jews would do in Germany what they had just done in Russia. But it's definitely worth talking about 6m and gas chambers, and it's not defensive, it's aggressive as these are things everybody knows, and they are brought up continually, yet they will work for our side when exploded.
The Holodomor, where 7-10 million Ukrainians were murdered/starved to death must've been a prime motivatiing factor in Hitler's preparations for war against Stalin and his Jewish comissars. Hitler was reacting to a very real threat, as any real leader of a people would
__________________
Vladimir Putin's Russia is being attacked by the very same forces that attacked Hitler's Germany, namely the Jews. The fate of the world hangs on Putin defeating the Jews.
 
Old October 18th, 2014 #189
zoomcopter
Senior Member
 
zoomcopter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The goyim reservation
Posts: 5,944
Blog Entries: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post

The memes VNN has spread now dominate all sectors of the internet where free response is allowed. Do I overstate?

VNN is the only place where the whole thing is done correctly. In that sense yes, we are the vanguard.
Truly a wonderful thing. Credit where credit is due.
__________________
Vladimir Putin's Russia is being attacked by the very same forces that attacked Hitler's Germany, namely the Jews. The fate of the world hangs on Putin defeating the Jews.
 
Old October 18th, 2014 #190
Joe_Smith
Senior Member
 
Joe_Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cesar Tort View Post
I’ve lived more than half a century in one of these countries and it’s the first time that I listen someone saying that. Even Judeo-liberal Wikipedia, that deceivingly grants "amnesty" to lots of castizos and harnizos here down the South, acknowledges that pure Amerinds are not the most populous in demographic studies (here and here).



This is Michael O’Meara’s Toward the White Republic:
Our people face extinction not because the Jews or the liberals monopolize the media, force-feed us anti-white ideas, control the leading institutions, and wield all the power and influence. This is a big part of it, to be sure, but to see things solely—or principally—in these terms is to overlook the last two or three centuries of Western history.
Like Sunic, O’Meara believes that capitalism is a larger factor of white decline than Jewish depredations. That’s what I call “bicausalism Type-B”:

This is a copy-paste quote of one of my links above:

These days my classification of “bicausalism” has stirred a long discussion through several threads at Occidental Dissent (see, e.g., here):

1.- Monocausalists – Most of the commenters at Age of Treason, and people like Dave Duke whom I deeply respect. These people believe that there’s but one cause of our woes: the subversive Jews.

2.- Bicausalists Type A – Those who, like Greg Johnson, Alex Linder and some commenters at Linder’s VNN Forum, believe that Jews are the primary cause of our woes, though there are other important factors as well. Unlike monocausalists, these bicausalists also blame our parents’ religion.

3.- Bicausalists Type B – Those who, like Tom Sunic, Manu Rodríguez and I believe that there’s something seriously wrong with us, extremely wrong actually. Whites’ mental issues (which include a Calvinist type of Old Testament Christianity that conquered North America) are the primary infection, and the Judaization of the West, a secondary infection (like AIDS / pneumonia, etc).

This is my corollary to the above classification. Note that I have added a #4, which means an antithetical monocausal stance to the one mentioned above. (Keywords: AoT = the blog Age of Treason; GoV = the blog Gates of Vienna):
1. AoT-like monocausalism – blames Jews 100%, Whites 0%

2. Bicausalism Type-A – assigns a blame above 50% to Jews

3. Bicausalism Type-B – assigns a blame above 50% to Whites

4. GoV-like monocausalism – blames Whites 100%, Jews 0%
Of course, in bicausalism you can either blame one or the other in diverse ratios depending on the specific bicausal individual, say, 90 / 10 percent or inversely 45 / 55 percent, etc.



I was trying to use specifically the case of the history of Spain's conversion to Christianity in the 6th century, and then Latin America as a textbook case of why whites can do it to themselves (thoroughgoing mongrelization) without the help of the subversive tribe.

You realize, Frodo, that in places like Mexico there is a stigma around being an Amerindian right? People in these cultures fill in "Mestizo" in their census because they are culturally Mestizos, IE they speak Spanish and have lost contact with their indigenous culture. With that said, the average black American has the same or more white DNA than the typical Mexican or Central American (with the exception of parts of North Mexico and Costa Rica). But I don't see you talking about how the British are race-mixers, do you?

Black Americans may be 15-30% European, but they are not called mulattoes. Why should someone who is less than 50% European be called a Mestizo?

One thing that won't beat the Jews is autistic neckbeards like yourself who feel the need to perpetually attack Southern Europe at every angle, even giving this precedence over Jews. To actually say Spain during the age of Exploration was not impacted by Jews at all (haha!), or that the case of Iberian sailors mixing with locals was uniquely an Iberian phenomenon (while the British, Dutch, etc all did the same), you are writing out of personal emotions and have an agenda, rather than objective reason or good faith.

Edit: I just found out you're a beaner living in Mexico. No wonder you've got so many complexes and compulsions.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'"
― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona

Last edited by Joe_Smith; October 18th, 2014 at 01:39 PM.
 
Old October 18th, 2014 #191
Cesar Tort
Junior Member
 
Cesar Tort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 88
Default

Joe Smith:

I never said that Spain in age of exploration was not impacted by Jew, you idiot.

Most Mexicans are a mixture of the three races (only the first mixture is called “mestizo”) as per my Spanish-English translation of the footnotes of the sixteen illustrations in New Spain that you yourself reposted way above:
1.- Spanish with Indian, mestizo

2.- Mestizo with Spanish, castizo

3.- Castizo with Spanish, Spanish

4.- Spanish with mora [negress], mulatto

5.- Mulatto with Spanish, morisco

6.- Morisco with Spanish, chino

7.- Chino with Indian, salta atrás

8.- Salta atrás with mulatto, lobo [literally, wolf]
9.- Lobo with china, gíbaro

10.- Gíbaro with mulatta, albarazado

11.- Albarazado with negro, cambujo

12.- Cambujo with Indian, sambaigo

13.- Sambaigo with loba, calpamulato

14.- Calpamulato with cambuja, tente en el aire [literally, stay in the air] 

15.- Tente en el aire con mulatta, noteentiendo [literally, I don’t get you]

16.- Noteentiendo with Indian, tornatrás [literally, jump back]
Alex:

Last time that I was called names in this blog (in another thread) by this same guy I promised not to post again here. I broke my promise because I wanted to discuss some important stuff with you, not with this guy. I am posting here with my real name and don’t even know the real name of this person (or other commenters).

I now see that I should have kept my promise of not coming here with this sort of trolling (“…autistic neckbeards like yourself”).

At any event you can discuss with me what I tried to convey above—that for O’Meara, Sunic and others Jews are not the primary cause of our current dilemmas—in my blogsite. Not here.

Anyway I must say that I’ve learned a lot from you. The way you expose the feminized males in the WN movement (CC, AmRen, OD, MR, TOO et al) as well as Christ-insanity is unsurpassed.
__________________
http://chechar.wordpress.com/
 
Old October 18th, 2014 #192
Joe_Smith
Senior Member
 
Joe_Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cesar Tort View Post
Joe Smith:

I never said that Spain in age of exploration was not impacted by Jew, you idiot.

Most Mexicans are a mixture of the three races (only the first mixture is called “mestizo”) as per my Spanish-English translation of the footnotes of the sixteen illustrations in New Spain that you yourself reposted way above:
1.- Spanish with Indian, mestizo

2.- Mestizo with Spanish, castizo

3.- Castizo with Spanish, Spanish

4.- Spanish with mora [negress], mulatto

5.- Mulatto with Spanish, morisco

6.- Morisco with Spanish, chino

7.- Chino with Indian, salta atrás

8.- Salta atrás with mulatto, lobo [literally, wolf]
9.- Lobo with china, gíbaro

10.- Gíbaro with mulatta, albarazado

11.- Albarazado with negro, cambujo

12.- Cambujo with Indian, sambaigo

13.- Sambaigo with loba, calpamulato

14.- Calpamulato with cambuja, tente en el aire [literally, stay in the air] 

15.- Tente en el aire con mulatta, noteentiendo [literally, I don’t get you]

16.- Noteentiendo with Indian, tornatrás [literally, jump back]
Mexicans are overwhelmingly Amerindian, perhaps slightly negro in some isolated cases, but by far the most important component is Amerindian. The European admixture of these Amerindians is comparable to black Americans (who are between 12-27% European on average), so why aren't the latter called "mulattos" if beaners are "Mestizos"?

Europeans never immigrated to Mexico in a number capable of radically changing the country's demographics and never formed a major component of that society except at the upper castes. India has few white Anglo-descendents (although it does have 1,000,000 Anglo-Indian mixed-race people who are a legacy of the Raj), most of the whites there were absorbed by the Indians or left. How is that any different than Mexico, aside from the fact that the whites of Mexico have actually been smart enough to stay distinct for a lot longer?


It's impossible to know for sure, but judging from your strange compulsions and the fact that you're Mexican, you're likely just a middle aged beaner with an axe to grind who gets off on pretending he's a blonde hair blue eyed hobbit on the internet.

If Iberians are a bunch of particularly immoral Jewish-descended ("It is said all Spaniards have a drop of Jewish blood"-Your website. Who is "saying" that, you? ) mulattoes, then you should become an anti-racist philo-semite after the Treaty of Tordesillas effectively split the entire known world between Spain and a tiny sliver of land called Portugal. A country with less than 1 million people controlling everything from India to Brazil for any period of time is a marvelous achievement that no population of mulattos will ever create. But let me guess, Vasco Da Gama and Ferdinand Magellan were nordic, right?

As a final factor, you ignore the fact that pre-Colombus Amerindians were already approximately 1/3 European, which gives a false impression of recent European admixture: http://sciencenordic.com/dna-links-n...cans-europeans Judging from the location where this ancient miscegenation occurred, the European component was probably nordic or proto-nordic: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mal%27ta-Buret%27_culture It would go a long way explaining 19th and 20th century Anthropological observations that many un-mixed Amerindians displayed pseudo-Nordic or Dinaric facial features, including light eyes and hair amongst tribes like Araucanos and facial features of the Cherokees.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'"
― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona

Last edited by Joe_Smith; October 18th, 2014 at 04:13 PM.
 
Old October 18th, 2014 #193
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,399
Blog Entries: 8
Default

 
Old October 18th, 2014 #194
313Chris
Senior Member
 
313Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,139
Default

What exactly was the point of posting that picture? I'm sure no one here has the slightest interest in what Griffin does when he's not online.
 
Old October 18th, 2014 #195
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,399
Blog Entries: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 313Chris View Post
What exactly was the point of posting that picture? I'm sure no one here has the slightest interest in what Griffin does when he's not online.
It's a picture from his organizing.
 
Old October 18th, 2014 #196
RickHolland
Bread and Circuses
 
RickHolland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Jewed Faggot States of ApemuriKa
Posts: 6,666
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie Key View Post
They are LOSers because they don't eat healthy food.



__________________
Only force rules. Force is the first law - Adolf H. http://erectuswalksamongst.us/ http://tinyurl.com/cglnpdj Man has become great through struggle - Adolf H. http://tinyurl.com/mo92r4z Strength lies not in defense but in attack - Adolf H.
 
Old October 18th, 2014 #197
Hadding
Senior Member
 
Hadding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Armor View Post
About Greg Johnson: what doesn't make sense is that he seems to think it is possible to defend aspects of National Socialism without first debunking the holocaust story.
Not only does he let the Holohoax stand, he also approves the Jews' value-judgment about it, that it was a terrible, shameful thing. Greggy has even tried to distance himself from this terrible shamefulness by claiming that it belongs to the "Old Right" while he, Greggy, is "New Right" and has nothing to do with that.

But then, copying the words of Johnathan Bowden, he says that we should just step over that! How can anyone step over it when Greggy has emphasized how shameful it was?

Greggy himself is not stepping over it like Bowden. Bowden never told anybody not to question the Holohoax. What Bowden meant, as I understand, was that one should not regard the Holohoax with more graveness than Marxists regard the atrocities in their own past. Another way to put it, perhaps, would be: don't validate the attack by reacting in a way that can be interpreted as guilt.

Bowden also said not to worry about being called fascist. Greggy by contrast has done backflips to avoid being called fascist: that's why he invented that phoney New Right/Old Right distinction.

Greggy has no problem with such hypocrisies. It's his normal mode.

Last edited by Hadding; October 18th, 2014 at 06:30 PM.
 
Old October 18th, 2014 #198
Hadding
Senior Member
 
Hadding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
Whatever. Maybe Bill Pierce should have pulled his punches and not talked about the jew.
Dr. Pierce never attacked Jared Taylor or Pat Buchanan. He spoke well of Buchanan and sold Taylor's book.

Your problem is that you don't grasp that Taylor and Buchanan are doing any good. You see only that the glass is half-empty.
 
Old October 18th, 2014 #199
Crowe
Senior Member
 
Crowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
Default

Few things some people in the movement do, which creates a problem with me personally:

#1 Making things about religion, instead of being about Race & Nation. The primary offender of this is Christian Identity.
#2 Bowing to the jews in any way. This can include parroting their lies. Perfect example of an offender of this is Jared Taylor.
#3 Towing the PC line in any way.

Its not so much political with me, although I will argue politics, but it won't create enough of a division with me personally as the ones listed above.
 
Old October 18th, 2014 #200
andy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: london
Posts: 12,865
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cesar Tort View Post
Joe Smith:

I never said that Spain in age of exploration was not impacted by Jew, you idiot.

Most Mexicans are a mixture of the three races (only the first mixture is called “mestizo”) as per my Spanish-English translation of the footnotes of the sixteen illustrations in New Spain that you yourself reposted way above:
1.- Spanish with Indian, mestizo

2.- Mestizo with Spanish, castizo

3.- Castizo with Spanish, Spanish

4.- Spanish with mora [negress], mulatto

5.- Mulatto with Spanish, morisco

6.- Morisco with Spanish, chino

7.- Chino with Indian, salta atrás

8.- Salta atrás with mulatto, lobo [literally, wolf]
9.- Lobo with china, gíbaro

10.- Gíbaro with mulatta, albarazado

11.- Albarazado with negro, cambujo

12.- Cambujo with Indian, sambaigo

13.- Sambaigo with loba, calpamulato

14.- Calpamulato with cambuja, tente en el aire [literally, stay in the air] 

15.- Tente en el aire con mulatta, noteentiendo [literally, I don’t get you]

16.- Noteentiendo with Indian, tornatrás [literally, jump back]
Alex:

Last time that I was called names in this blog (in another thread) by this same guy I promised not to post again here. I broke my promise because I wanted to discuss some important stuff with you, not with this guy. I am posting here with my real name and don’t even know the real name of this person (or other commenters).

I now see that I should have kept my promise of not coming here with this sort of trolling (“…autistic neckbeards like yourself”).

At any event you can discuss with me what I tried to convey above—that for O’Meara, Sunic and others Jews are not the primary cause of our current dilemmas—in my blogsite. Not here.

Anyway I must say that I’ve learned a lot from you. The way you expose the feminized males in the WN movement (CC, AmRen, OD, MR, TOO et al) as well as Christ-insanity is unsurpassed.
Is there a similar list for the Greeks ?
__________________
The above post is as always my opinion

Chase them into the swamps
 
Reply

Tags
#1, white nationalism, wn infighting

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:19 AM.
Page generated in 0.31609 seconds.