Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts


Go Back   Vanguard News Network Forum > News & Discussion > General Discussion
Donate Register Multimedia Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Login

 
Thread Display Modes Share
Old September 22nd, 2012 #101
Steven L. Akins
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy Wagahuski View Post
Only thing brown is his fambly.
Yeah, that is whay made me think of Josh Brown, he is a talented craftsman who hails from Georgia, lives in California and has an Indian wife and half Indian kids.
 
Old September 22nd, 2012 #102
Bardamu
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,571
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven L. Akins View Post
Yeah, that is whay made me think of Josh Brown, he is a talented craftsman who hails from Georgia, lives in California and has an Indian wife and half Indian kids.
I was down in Palo Alto today riding motorcycles with my distinguished friend. We were in a fancy coffee house and there was this really beautiful young lady coming in and out. She was a white knock-out. We were leaving at about the same time she was and I couldn't help but notice she had two niglets in tow. I said to Joe, "Hey look Joe, that beautiful white girl, she has niglets." Her friend was bringing up the rear and heard me, and gave me what passes in Palo Alto for a hard look.
 
Old September 25th, 2012 #103
Pat Bateman
Member
 
Pat Bateman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Dorsia
Posts: 342
Default

I'm always curious to see what the reaction of Christians will be as the the jew advances its agenda in plain sight.
After this Gawker article was posted here, I decided to pay a visit to Christianforums.com and posted the article with a brief summary of what the jews were doing.

Immediately, 4 posters appear with familiar approaches, ranging from "pedos are not monsters, they're just like you and me" to "you're misreading the article" to "yah, it's da joos" and "Why the hate?".
So out of the goodness of my heart, I reply by questioning their need to find common ground with deviants, refer to them as egalitarian retards, and post several articles: the Frankfurt School / Critical theory, Jews DO control the media, links to VNN, Ted Pikes article and a Time magazine piece on the gay brain.
All of which I consider Divine Providence,
There were 6 positive responses to this.

The thread gets 1,000 views in 2 days and is moving along nicely.... suddenly it gets locked, and one of the moderators - a pea-brained sow with the handle "FreeinChrist" proceeds to gut the thread - reducing it from 8 pages down to 3 - all the positive responses and jew-related articles are deleted.
Then she reconsiders, deletes the thread entirely, and bans me for "flaming Jews".
After being cast out, I received this pm:

Re: Gawker Initiates Media Push to Normalize Pedophilia

Hello!
The post below is just one of the posts that have been brought to the attention of staff. In your posts, we have seen flaming (insulting other members, flaming Jews for instance) and linking to articles with profanity. You are being banned. If you wish to argue this ban, you can do so in the Member Services Center.

FreeinChrist
Supervisor



What was interesting to me was the amount of views the thread got in such a short period of time before the mods caught it.
I suspect the forum is infested/supervised by jews.
In light of these 2 factors, I'll be stopping by every couple of weeks to re-register and post something educational.
If even 5 out of the thousand who viewed the thread begin to wake up, it's worth the effort.
__________________
....and this time, Hymie - We Go Vertical!
 
Old September 25th, 2012 #104
Marcus
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 479
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat Bateman View Post
I'm always curious to see what the reaction of Christians will be as the the jew advances its agenda in plain sight.
After this Gawker article was posted here, I decided to pay a visit to Christianforums.com and posted the article with a brief summary of what the jews were doing.

Immediately, 4 posters appear with familiar approaches, ranging from "pedos are not monsters, they're just like you and me" to "you're misreading the article" to "yah, it's da joos" and "Why the hate?".
The hypocrisy of the Abrahamic religions is striking in this regard. Don't you find it interesting how Christians have nothing but relentless, murderous hatred for homosexuals, yet outright refuse to condemn child molestation?

Just something to think about.
 
Old September 25th, 2012 #105
ATiii
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: London, UK
Posts: 280
Default

This is so sick. If America and the rest of the world don't wake up to the Jews' plan soon we'll see child prostitution being taught in school. Hang the lot of them and torture them too.

Alan
 
Old September 25th, 2012 #106
Steven L. Akins
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcus View Post
The hypocrisy of the Abrahamic religions is striking in this regard. Don't you find it interesting how Christians have nothing but relentless, murderous hatred for homosexuals, yet outright refuse to condemn child molestation?

Just something to think about.
You won't find many who condone it.
 
Old September 25th, 2012 #107
Soldatul Vostru
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Wrong Parallel Universe
Posts: 3,499
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcus View Post
The hypocrisy of the Abrahamic religions is striking in this regard. Don't you find it interesting how Christians have nothing but relentless, murderous hatred for homosexuals, yet outright refuse to condemn child molestation?

Just something to think about.
And while they correctly hold that homosexuality is wrong they condone miscegenation, which is in my opinion even worse. At least faggots don't breed...
 
Old October 6th, 2012 #108
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,692
Default

Normalizing Incest


Quote:
Can sex between brothers and sisters ever be normal?


By Dr. Keith Ablow

Published September 11, 2012

FoxNews.com

In an interview published Monday, Hollywood director Nick Cassavetes, whose new movie Yellow tells the story of a fictional love affair between an adult sister and brother, claimed that incest is just the latest frontier in people throwing off the shackles of rigid, cultural convention and following their hearts.

According to Cassavetes’ interview with The Wrap, “I have no experience with incest . . . . We had heard a few stories where brothers and sisters were completely, absolutely in love with one another. You know what? This whole movie is about judgment, and lack of it, and doing what you want. Who gives a shit if people judge you? I’m not saying this is an absolute but in a way, if you’re not having kids — who gives a damn? Love who you want. Isn’t that what we say? Gay marriage — love who you want? If it’s your brother or sister it’s super-weird, but if you look at it, you’re not hurting anybody except every single person who freaks out because you’re in love with one another.”

With this declaration, Cassavetes misses an inherent reality about human beings and joins the ranks of those whose ignorance of psychological truth (that’s right, truth, not flabby, toxic relativism and malignant narcissism) imperils our children under the guise of freeing them.

Here’s the truth: When sisters and brothers have sex with one another they are not expressing genuine romantic love; they are expressing long-forged, pathologically fractured boundaries that existed in their family of origin. They are manifesting roots deep in soil that was fouled at some point. They are enacting a drama that is really about having grown up in a household or in households that unleashed inappropriate, toxic sexual impulses—always, in my experience, because one or both of the siblings was exposed to child sexual abuse or was suffering with a severe mental illness.

Sorry, Nick, that’s just how it is: Normal, healthy brothers and sisters don’t have sex as kids, adolescents or when they grow up. Sick ones do. And when you make the statement that it is just fine for consenting sisters and brothers to have sex, you presumably also believe (based on the comments quoted above) that fathers can have sex with their “consenting” adult daughters.

Right?

And, you believe it is fine that mothers bed their consenting adult sons.

Right?

Why would anyone suggest, otherwise? Aren’t human beings free to do as they choose? Why should we call anyone disordered? Isn’t that just vicious name-calling? And how about this one, Nick? Why can’t a killer do in a consenting victim? Why can’t someone who believes the CIA is following him and who ends up homeless just be called a “life artist?” Why does that person have to be labeled psychotic? Who’s to pass judgment? Certainly not you.

No, you won’t, because you have no guiding principles, other than this one: There are no guiding principles. But, I will. Because I don’t mind taking a stand on the side of inherent, human truth when twisting it confines people to psychological pathology and leaves them forever in pain. So, here you go: Sisters and brothers who have sexual affairs are not well. They need help sorting out and overcoming psychological suffering and terrifying traumas that visited them long ago.

In our increasingly psychologically ill society, the mainstreaming of psychiatric pathology—what one of my mentors termed, “collaborating with madness”—passes for tolerance and enlightenment. And the ambassadors of this epidemic of pathological-behavior-as-freedom too often come from an industry that I happen to have more than a little experience with: television and film.

So here’s the truth, from this one psychiatrist, so that not every psychiatrist is presumed to be a pushover for psychiatric disorders masquerading as one’s “rights” or as expressions of “freedom:” A sexual 'affair' between an adult brother and sister means both of those individuals are severely psychologically disordered. Period.

I’m here to help them, in part by telling them that, even if they are in denial about the underlying suffering fueling their symptoms (incest), they will have to confront it, eventually. And, Nick—even with my respect for some of your other work and full disclosure, here, with my personal and positive history with your family, your notion that disordered psychology and behavior is freedom, means that, in time, you will have to confront some long-denied demons, too.

Because in my office, and eventually, in yours, too, the truth always wins.



Dr. Keith Ablow is a psychiatrist and member of the Fox News Medical A-Team.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/...#ixzz28Uj2ohvG
__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race


''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers

Last edited by Serbian; October 6th, 2012 at 12:38 AM.
 
Old October 6th, 2012 #109
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,692
Default



Last year Penny Lawrence (28) tracked down her long-lost father Garry Ryan (46). Lawrence is now pregnant with his child and claims to be in love with her father.

Read more:

http://www.irishcentral.com/news/Iri...#ixzz28UnpsP93
__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race


''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers
 
Old September 24th, 2015 #110
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,399
Blog Entries: 8
Default

Leftism and pedophilia:

 
Old October 24th, 2015 #111
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,399
Blog Entries: 8
Default

Intensified Jewing: “Not All Pedophiles are Bad People”
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
October 24, 2015


Back again, goyim! Surprise, goyim, surprise!

A couple weeks ago, Salon published an article promoting the idea that most pedophiles are actually good folks. The basis of the concept is that pedophilia is a “sexual orientation” that people cannot help and so they should be embraced by society as long as they don’t rape kids.

The author is allegedly a pedophile who says he is only attracted to children, but doesn’t do sex acts with them because he’s a good guy. However, he threatens to start molesting/raping children if society doesn’t begin accepting him and his kiddie-loving comrades.

As part of his closing, he writes:

Quote:
So, please, be understanding and supportive. It’s really all we ask of you. Treat us like people with a massive handicap we must overcome, not as a monster. If we are going to make it in the world without offending, we need your help. Listening to me was a start.
If you don’t “help them,” they will “offend” – that is, they will molest/rape kids if you don’t do what they want you to do, which is allow them social acceptance. Benign as the wording is intended to be, that is a threat, placing responsibility for the actions of child-rapists on a society which refuses to accept pedophilia as a “sexual orientation.”

Now, The Independent has published basically the same article.

From it (after opening with a mention of Jimmy Savile):

Quote:
There is a danger of becoming hysterical about paedophilia and seeing it everywhere, like witches at Salem, or “Commies” in Hollywood during McCarthyism. Paedophiles do exist, but there are very few of them and not all are child molesters. It is possible to be attracted to children as a sexual orientation without acting upon those desires.

In my studies of the Paedophile Information Exchange in the 1980s, many members admitted sexual feelings for children which they had been able to contain or turn to social good. Some gravitated toward occupations such as schoolteacher or social worker, where they could enjoy the company of children without plotting abuse. This fitted with personality profiles indicating that they were gentle, rational and not disposed to harm anybody.
So the good pedophiles get jobs around kids so they can “enjoy their company” without molesting them?

Is this satire?

Quote:
If not all paedophiles molest children, much child abuse (perhaps 80 per cent) is perpetrated by non-paedophiles, often family or friends. The UK legal age of consent of 16 is arbitrary. Many men admit attraction to underage girls, even if they would not consider taking advantage.
Yeah, and in the UK they constantly confuse this whole issue by playing a word game.

Pedophilia does not relate in any way to the age-of-consent, but to the sexual development of a person. Generally, a pedophile is defined as someone attracted to children under 11.

According to Wikiepdia: “Pedophilia or paedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children, generally age 11 years or younger. As a medical diagnosis, specific criteria for the disorder extend the cut-off point for prepubescence to age 13.”

But the UK Jew media will call a 19-year-old who has sex with a 15-year-old a pedophile, in order to confuse the entire concept (even while a lot of countries still have an age of consent that is under 16).

Note that a big part of this came about during the Catholic Church sex abuse scandal, when the homosexuals didn’t want the priests to simply be called homosexuals, and instead argued that they were “pedophiles.” Reality is that these were just normal homosexuals – all of these boys were pubescent, not little kids.


The term “pedophile priests” is used exclusively by journalists such as Sheryl Goldberg who want to protect the image of homosexuals. More honest media just called it “sex abuse.”

Actual kiddie-fiddlers love this confusion. The Independent article closes with further attempts to exploit this confusion.

Quote:
Others might be more lax (John Peel famously said that he “never checked the IDs” of the backstage fans who queued up to meet him after radio shows). But such men would not be called paedophiles unless they were exclusively attracted to children. Nor would we regard a female schoolteacher who has an affair with one of her teenage pupils a paedophile, however immoral her behaviour – “sexual abuse” is often referred to, whereas the term “paedophile” is rarely employed.

Perhaps we should stop looking for “peds under the bed” as scapegoats and focus on clarifying the criteria regarding unacceptable exploitation of those in vulnerable positions – whether due to age or any other circumstance.
Because a female teacher who has sex with a student isn’t a “pedophile.” The word shouldn’t be employed in that case at all. Nor should it be employed in the case of not checking an ID when maybe the girl is 15 but looks like she is at least 16. It should be employed only as a scientific term to describe people who are attracted to pre-pubescent children.

Girls used to get married when they were 13 or 14. Pushing this definition, everyone in history was a pedophile by default. No sense there.

Look for this angle of “well, some people maybe like 15-year-old girls, that is the same as raping kids really” angle to keep being pressed as the Jewing intensifies.

“Pedophilia as sexual orientation” is the next crusade. Guaranteed. Gay marriage is global and Bruce Jenner has normalized trannies, and these people don’t ever just say “ah well, we’ve gone far enough now, might as well stop.” There is always a next step and a next one. They will also pushing having sex with dogs and horses as normal. That isn’t a prediction so much as it is just a fact.


They will also Jew you like this. Why? Because they’re Jewish.

As soon as they said it was alright for women to have sex with Blacks, it was all downhill.

http://www.dailystormer.com/intensif...re-bad-people/
 
Old November 19th, 2016 #113
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,399
Blog Entries: 8
Default

Pedophile Claims He’s “Not a Monster,” Media Goes Along with It – Again
Zeiger
Daily Stormer
November 19, 2016


Not a monster? Your face is a perfect counter-argument.

Salon came out last year with this one-armed pedophile’s story. At the time, we were like, “I guess they’re going to start promoting pedophilia now, huh?”

And they probably would be, if more open pedophiles were willing to show their faces and talk to the media. But it turns out those scumbags are more comfortable in the shadows than in the limelight.

So they’re trotting out the same pervert again to try and make their point.

The Sun:

Quote:
A SELF-CONFESSED ‘non-offending paedophile’ is “not ashamed” of being sexually attracted to children as young as three because he doesn’t act on his desires.

One-armed Todd Nickerson, 43, from Tennessee, claims paedophilia is better understood as a sexual orientation.
So, you’re not ashamed of the fact that you desire to do unspeakably evil and degenerate acts, just because you (supposedly) don’t act on them?

What about people who’d desire having sex with animals, or corpses? Should they be proud of themselves as well, and campaign in newspapers about their “sexual orientation,” as long as they claim not to act on it?

Quote:
He is a moderator for the online forum ‘VirPed’ – short for ‘virtuous paedophiles’ and also sometimes called ‘ethical paedophiles’ or ‘gold star paedophiles’.
Wow, you don’t sodomize children? What an achievement. Good job, bro.

Quote:
The terms are used to describe those who have an attraction to prepubescent kids but control their urges and refrain from watching child pornography or seeking sexual contact with minors.
And yet they still choose to base their identity around their sick perversion, calling themselves “pedophiles.”

Quote:
The VirPed forum has a few thousand users, according to Todd, although not all of them are active members, and the site acts as a resource “to help virtuous paedophiles remain law-abiding”.
This right there is probably the most telling sign of what these people truly are and how they think.

They don’t actually think abusing children is wrong. It’s just “against the law.” This is why they say they remain “law-abiding.” But clearly, if the law was changed, they would no longer have any problem indulging their deranged desires.

Quote:
Todd, who is one of only a handful of voluntarily ‘out’ paedophiles in the US, told Barcroft TV: “I am a paedophile. I’m not a monster. I have the attraction but I don’t act on it.

“I have never ever sexually abused a child and I never will. I do not look at child porn, I never will.

“I obey the laws, I respect the laws, I respect society’s position on this. I understand it and agree with it.”

Todd went public as a paedophile in a blog for American liberal news site Salon in September 2015.
Yeah, you obey the law – or so you claim.

But why are you campaigning like this?

Clearly, your goal is to foster an environment of tolerance for freaks like yourself. Otherwise, if you really thought that diddling kids was evil, you would never have come out as a pedophilia advocate, would you?

Are you condemning NAMBLA, you one-armed freak? Didn’t think so.

And what will happen once this climate of sympathy for pedos is established?

You’ll push to change the laws, of course. In fact, there’s constantly faggots agitating to lower the legal age of consent all around the Western world.

We Republicans are the only people standing in the way of this evil. You can be sure that liberals and their Jewish handlers are only growing impatient with the masses’ reluctance to embrace this next step in the progress towards social justice.

May the heavens grant us the strength to wipe this darkness from the earth forever.

http://www.dailystormer.com/pedophil...with-it-again/
 
Old November 19th, 2016 #114
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,399
Blog Entries: 8
Default

Look at the pictures of the guy in The Sun:

https://www.thesun.co.uk/living/2204...n-his-desires/

You can clearly see that something is not right with him.

What the fuck is this?

 
Old November 19th, 2016 #115
White Brazilian Boy
Senior Member
 
White Brazilian Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Posts: 823
Default

Pedophilia and erotization of kids are two sides of the same coin. Im young(20), but even before I completed two digits of life I used to be disgusted when I saw kids my age acting like mini sluts. The media(with the help of parents) is creating a generation of kids that are acting like whores at an earlier age.

 
Old November 20th, 2016 #116
N.B. Forrest
Senior Member
 
N.B. Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia, CSA
Posts: 11,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by White Brazilian Boy View Post
Pedophilia and erotization of kids are two sides of the same coin. Im young(20), but even before I completed two digits of life I used to be disgusted when I saw kids my age acting like mini sluts. The media(with the help of parents) is creating a generation of kids that are acting like whores at an earlier age.

Good cartoon. There are far too many permissive parents - particularly single women - who find childhood sexualization "cute" because they themselves were raised to do whatever the hell they wanted at an early age. Little girls shouldn't even be allowed to wear makeup or paint their nails until they reach their teens; all those feminine things should be kept as the badges of a girl's transition into a young woman.
__________________
"First: Do No Good." - The Hymiecratic Oath

"The man who does not exercise the first law of nature—that of self preservation — is not worthy of living and breathing the breath of life." - John Wesley Hardin
 
Old November 29th, 2016 #117
RickHolland
Bread and Circuses
 
RickHolland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Jewed Faggot States of ApemuriKa
Posts: 6,666
Blog Entries: 1
Default


__________________
Only force rules. Force is the first law - Adolf H. http://erectuswalksamongst.us/ http://tinyurl.com/cglnpdj Man has become great through struggle - Adolf H. http://tinyurl.com/mo92r4z Strength lies not in defense but in attack - Adolf H.

Last edited by RickHolland; November 29th, 2016 at 09:33 PM.
 
Reply

Tags
#1, pedophile community, pedophilia

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:39 AM.
Page generated in 0.31829 seconds.