Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old February 25th, 2020 #1
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default It’s a HOLOHOAX

It’s a HOLOHOAX (Don’t Be Fooled) Pt1


February 24, 2020

Note- “IT’S A HOLOHOAX (don’t be fooled)” are series of blog posts that thoroughly expose the Jewish Holocaust lie. There were no “Nazi Death Camps” and no “Nazi Gas Chambers”. You have been fooled! This is your opportunity to break free of the mind control you have been taught in school and in the media. You have been deceived! We all have… but never again.

It has been said that it is easier to believe a lie one has heard a hundred times, than a truth one has never heard before. We have heard 6 million lies about the “Holocaust”. The truth about the Holohoax has been hidden. Read below to uncover the cover-up!


Note: This blog series is derived from “Did Six Million Really Die?” book by Richard E. Harwood (1974) with many additional sources, originally presented in DJ Noble Protagonist’s free E-book (The Battle to preserve Western Civilization): https://archive.org/details/@nobleprotagonist

Note: Core reference material: https://holocausthandbooks.com/

Also in German: http://holocausthandbuecher.com/



#HOLOHOAX


Quote:
Individual actions (against Jews) by members of the NSDAP, its subordinate offices and organizations must cease at once. Whoever hereafter participates in individual actions against Jews, or encourages the same, will be treated in the future as a provocateur, a rebel, and enemy of the State.” -Adolf Hitler decree on August 20th,1935

I strictly forbid any member of the SS from under*taking individual action against Jews. As in every issue, the solution of the Jewish question is the concern of the Fuhrer, and not of individuals. Actions contrary to this order, even to the slightest degree, will be punishment with dismissal from the SS.” -The Heinrich Himmler Order, 8-20-35
The Jewish “Holocaust” is a Holohoax! To this day, there has been no scientific or forensic proof to verify the claim of a Jewish “Holocaust”, in other words, it’s a “Conspiracy Theory”. In fact, there is not even proof that even one single Jew, yet alone “6 Million” Jews, in a German concentration (internment) camp died of “gassing”. In addition, there is no proof that the German concentration camps were “Death Camps”, as opposed to internment work camps.

Quote:
Any History that is restricted from being studied must be a lie. The truth never needs protection.” -Anonymous blog commenter
Atrocity propaganda is nothing new. It has accompanied every conflict of the 20th Century and will continue to do so. After every conflict, however, it has been customary for retractions to follow.

No such retractions have been made after the Second World War. In fact, rather than diminish with the passage of years, the atrocity propaganda concerning the German occupation, and in particular their treatment of the Jews, has done nothing but increase its virulence, and elaborate its catalog of horrors. This all adds to the growing mythology of the concentration camps and especially to the story that no less than “Six Million” Jews were exterminated in them.

Quote:
I do want to get rid of (expulsion) those Jews who since the War have invaded our country from Eastern Europe and undermined our morale by mad speculation, who are devoid of all patriotism and have made fortunes out of our national catastrophe. As for the rest, I merely want to limit their influence by passing legal prohibitions against their participation in the Government and by eliminating from public life such non-Jews as act as puppets for Jewish capital.” -Hitler

My views are known. I am the only German leader who is not afraid to speak out. I am concerned with the Jews only in so far as they obstruct the realization of the ideal German Reich. But I will countenance no mob action, even against Jews. I never did. We have been made the scapegoat for the undisciplined mob action of the Communists. Jews have nothing to fear from us as long as they do not mix with us. This they must learn. As long as the Jews here will not try to pose as Germans, and have the temerity to speak for Germans, they will be unmolested.” -Hitler
Quote:
In any future cases of conflict the vanquished will always be the guilty party, because the victor can establish this fact in the easiest manner possible.” -Hitler
DISCOURAGEMENT OF NATIONALISM


In terms of political blackmail, the allegation that Six Million Jews died during the Second World War has much more far-reaching implications for the White people of America & Europe than simply the advantages it has gained for the Jewish nation. Should these White people attempt to assert their patriotism and preserve their national integrity in an age when the very existence of nation-states is being threatened, especially with mass Third-World immigration, they are immediately branded as “Nazis”.

So long as the “Six Million Jews were exterminated” myth is perpetuated, White peoples everywhere will remain in bondage to it. The call for “international tolerance & understanding” will be hammered home by the Jewish-controlled United Nations until nationhood itself, the very guarantee of national freedom, is completely abolished.

RACE PROBLEM SUPPRESSED


The accusation of the “Six Million” is not only used to undermine the principle of nationhood & national pride, but it threatens the survival of the White race itself.

White countries are today facing the gravest danger in their history, the demographic danger posed by the alien races in their midst. What happens if a man dares to speak of the race problem, of its biological & political implications? He is branded a “racist” and a “Nazi”. Thus, any rational discussion of the problems of race and the effort to preserve racial integrity is effectively discouraged, due to the Six Million myth.

The Six Million myth, told by the Jews, relies on the brainwashed masses believing that the “evil Nazis” were racist. The truth is that the German National Socialists were race-realists and were experiencing a miraculous rebirth of German nationalism, putting Germans first in their own country. In the midst of World War 2, some of the Jews were interned in work camps in order to protect the ethnic Germans. These camps were never “Death Camps”.

HOLOCAUST DENIAL = PRISON


In Germany, France, Austria, Belgium, Switzerland and several other European countries, like England, as well as in Israel, it is a crime publicly to dispute or “mock” the official version of Holocaust history.

A short list of those who have been fined, jailed, imprisoned, or forced into exile for “denying the Holocaust” includes Robert Faurisson & Roger Garaudy in France, Siegfried Verbeke in Belgium, Juergen Graf & Gaston-Armand Amaudruz in Switzerland, and Guenter Deckert, Hans Schmidt, Fredrick Toben, Germar Rudolf, Ernst Zundel, Horst Mahler, Monika Schaefer and Ursula Haverbeck in Germany.

Note: The simple fact that International Jewry has to resort to imprisoning senior citizens, like Ursula Haverback, in Germany, shows that Jewish Supremacy stands upon the Holohoax, a house of cards, that simple Holocaust Revisionism will eventually & inevitably topple. The countdown has begun!

Some people may be offended by those who play down Jewish death & suffering during World War II. But free & open societies protect even offensive speech. That’s why Western countries defend the right of their citizens, for example, to praise Communism or promote atheism.

“Holocaust denial” laws violate ancient & universal standards of justice. They criminalize even factual or truthful statements that “play down” or “whitewash” the Holocaust, known to revisionists as the Holohoax. They are selective and one-sided. In countries where they are on the books, the Holocaust is the only chapter of history that cannot be freely discussed. They inhibit historical inquiry & restrict free speech. They are a disgrace, and should be repealed.

Talmudic defenders of the Six Million Holocaust story may be able to sporadically dispute or debunk some of the miscellaneous “facts” listed by Holocaust revisionists, but proof that the Holocaust was a Holohoax is too great to be objectively contested. Hence, the need for “Holocaust denial” laws; to jail the defenders of truth who are revising the historical lies of International Jewry.

A TRIBUTE TO ERNST ZUNDEL (R.I.P.)


Ernst Zundel (1939-2017) was a German-born publisher, author and civil rights activist. He was a prominent figure in the worldwide Holocaust revisionist network, and accordingly was routinely described in the mainstream media as a “notorious Holocaust denier”. He was also an unabashed admirer of Adolf Hitler, and an unapologetic defender of the legacy of Third Reich Germany. For seven years he was held behind bars, first in Canada, and then in Germany, solely for the peaceful expression of non-conformist views. For some time he was the most prominent political prisoner in the Western world.

Zundel shockingly found out in a “Human Rights Court”, in which the chairman had the gall to state for the record, that “truth is no defense”, even though one has to swear on the Bible to tell the truth and nothing but the truth. If the truth is no defense in a courtroom, then the lie prevails.

Zundel put the so-called “Holocaust” itself on trial. Seated next to his laywer was the learned revisionist historian Professor Robert Faurisson of France, who guided Zundel’s attorney cross-examination of a long train of “saintly Holocaust survivors”.

For the first time in history the holy “survivors” finally had to submit their “testimony” to scrutiny, to the rules of evidence & cross-examination; something that has never happened before or since. Canadian readers & viewers learned that there was no scientific evidence for homicidal gas chambers, that homicidal gassings were a rumor that the inmates heard but never actually witnessed for themselves.

In Zunel’s 1988 trial, Fred Leuchter, the designer of the U.S. Prison system’s execution apparatus, as an expert defense witness who tested alleged execution “gas chambers” on-site in Auschwitz, Poland, determined that they had never been used to kill anyone.


GERMAN PRE-WAR POLICY TOWARDS JEWS


Quote:
The war against Jewry came about because an alien people on German soil arrogated the political and spiritual leadership of the country, and, believing itself triumphant, flaunted it brazenly.” -Alfred Rosenberg
Adolf Hitler rightly considered the Jews, as collective to be a disloyal & avaricious element within the German national community, as well as a force of decadence in Germany’s cultural life. This was held to be particularly unhealthy since, during the Weimar period, the Jews had risen to a position of remarkable strength & influence in the nation, particularly in law, finance and the mass media, even though they constituted only one percent of the population.

The fact that Karl Marx was a Jew and that Jews, such as Rosa Luxembourg & Karl Liebknecht, were disproportionately prominent in the leadership of communist movements in Germany, also tended to convince the ethnic Germans of the powerful internationalist & Communist tendencies of the Jewish people.

The National Socialist German government’s solution to the Jewish problem was to deprive them of their influence within the nation by various legislative acts, and most important of all, to encourage their emigration from the country altogether.

By 1939, the great majority of German Jews had emigrated, all of them with a sizeable proportion of their assets. Many of them were transferred to the British territory of Palestine via the “Transfer Agreement”. Never, at any time, had the German NSDAP leadership even contemplated a policy of genocide towards the Jewish people.

JEWS CALLED EMIGRATION “EXTERMINATION”


International Jewry was quick to interpret emigration policies of internal discrimination, to protect the ethnic Germans, as equivalent to Jewish “extermination” itself.

A 1936 anti-German propaganda book, by Jewish novelist, Leon Feuchtwanger, regarded straightforward emigration as the physical “extermination” of German Jewry. A Jewish communist, Hans Beimler, wrote an anti-German propaganda book that also followed this narrative, claiming that Dachau was a “Death Camp”, though by his own admission he was released after only a month there.

Concentration camps in pre-war Germany were used for the detention of political opponents & subversives, principally liberals, Social Democrats & Communists of all kinds, a proportion of whom were Jews, such as Hans Beimler.

Unlike the millions enslaved in the Soviet Union, the German concentration camp population was always small. Between 1934 and 1938, its population seldom exceeded 20,000 throughout the whole of Germany and the number of Jews was never more than 3000 individuals.

THE TRANSFER AGREEMENT


Although Zionists today are loath to admit it publicly, the fact remains that the Zionist movement, during the period leading up to the Second World War, worked closely with the National Socialist government in Germany to solve the so-called Jewish question. Needless to say, professional historians have largely neglected this surprising cooperation.

On August 25, 1933, the Ministry of Economics issued a circular to all German currency control offices informing them of the recently concluded agreement with the Jewish Agency for Palestine. Known as the Haavara, or Transfer Agreement, it tied the emigration of Jews to Palestine to the sale of the German goods. By permitting each Jew who indicated a willingness to emigrate to Palestine the opportunity to take along a fixed portion of assets in the form of German goods, Germany’s tight currency restrictions were circumvented, while the depressed export economy of the Reich received a much needed stimulus.

Above all, the Transfer Agreement greatly promoted the removal of Jews from Germany, a principal domestic goal of the Hitler regime.

The Jewish anti-German boycott, begun shortly after Hitler came to power in January 1933, may have been neutralized as a result of Haavara. Was International Jewry divided or just playing multi-layered 4D chess? In any event, even though Germany became the number-one exporter of goods to Palestine by 1937, its significance did not reside in its economic benefits, but in the fact that it created a consensus in the German government for Palestine as the principal destination for German Jews.

This consensus lasted until the effects of the Arab revolt beginning in 1936 and the Peel Partition Plan, an unsuccessful attempt to divide the country into Jewish & Arab sectors, the following year forced a reconsideration of the Jewish emigration policy. Thereafter, the consensus was altered, but the policy of promoting Jewish emigration remained the same.

Efforts were made to explore alternatives for Jewish emigration, such as Madagascar. Poland had already made repeated overtures to the French for Madagascar’s use as a site for their large Polish-Jewish population.

The German SS oversaw the establishment of occupational retraining centers run by the Hechalutz, the principal Zionist youth organization, to teach young Jews the necessary skills that were in demand in Palestine. Located throughout Germany, the centers also provided training for Jews who planned to emigrate to other countries.

The British Embassy in Berlin issued its stamp of approval in a memorandum of April 3, 1936, pointing out that they “enabled the Jewish Agency to select suitable candidates for admission to Palestine, better prepared for absorption into the economy of the country.”

When Nuremberg laws were passed on September 15th, 1935, they were welcomed by Zionist groups which considered them important in breaking down the resistance of the majority of German Jews, who still regarded the Hitler regime as a temporary phenomenon. The net effect of this German-Zionist connection was to make Zionism the principal movement among Jewish youth in Germany in the 1930s.

So despite of the basic hostility between the Hitler regime & International Jewry, for a number of years Jewish Zionist & German National Socialist interests coincided. In collaborating with the Zionists for a pragmatic, mutually desirable and humane solution to a complex problem, the Third Reich was willing to make foreign exchange sacrifices, such as angering the Arabs.

As a result of the Transfer Agreement, German exports arrived in Palestine at bargain prices with the help of Jewish capital & Jewish commercial assistance, and a large number of German Jews arrived in Palestine. Goods worth a total of 139.5 million Reichsmark were transferred by 1939. Only the outbreak of war in September, 1939, ended the transfer practice.

By 1939, the consistent efforts of the German government to secure the departure of Jews from the Reich had resulted in the emigration of 400,000 German Jews from a total population of about 600,000, and an additional 480,000 emigrants from Austria & Czechoslovakia, which constituted almost their entire Jewish populations. This feat was accomplished through Offices of Jewish Emigration in Berlin, Viena and Prague established by Adolf Eichmann, the head of the Jewish Investigation Office of the Gestapo.

Had Hitler cherished any intention of “exterminating” the Jews, it is inconceivable that he would have allowed more than 880,000 Jews to leave Reich territory with the bulk of their wealth intact, much less considered plans for their mass emigration to Palestine or Madagascar.


Quote:
The Fuhrer does not at all wish that the Jews should be evacuated to Siberia. There, under the harshest living conditions, they would undoubtedly develop again a strong life-element. He would much prefer to resettle them in central Africa. There they would live in a climate that would certainly not make them strong and resistant. In any case, it is the Fuhrer’s goal to make Western Europe completely Jew-free. Here they may no longer have their homeland.” -Goebbels, 1942
Hitler’s policy of emigration from Europe was still under consideration well into the war period, notably the Madagascar Plan, which Eichmann discussed in 1940 with French Colonial Office experts after the defeat of France had made the surrender of the colony a practical proposition.

Note: Zionists did everything in their power to make the European Jews’ plight as bad as possible, to uproot them completely, in order to get them to move to Palestine.

GERMAN POLICY TOWARDS JEWS – OUTBREAK OF WAR


The Jewish Chronicle, on September 8th, 1939, admitted, “With the coming of the war the situation regarding the Jews altered drastically. It is not widely known that world Jewry declared itself to be a belligerent (hostile & aggressive) party in the Second World War, and there was therefore ample basis under international law for the Germans to intern the Jewish population as a hostile force.

On September 5th, 1939, Chaim Weizmann, the principal Zionist leader and Israeli statesman, had declared war against Germany on behalf of the world’s Jews, stating that the Jews stand by Great Britain and will fight on the side of the democracies… The Jewish Agency is ready to enter into immediate arrangements for utilizing Jewish manpower, technical ability, resources, etc.”

All Jews had thus been declared “agents” willing to prosecute a war against the German Reich and, as a consequence, Reich leader of the SS, Heinrich Himmler and his second in command, Reinhard Heydrich, were eventually to begin the policy of Jewish internment.

It is worth noting that the United States & Canada had already interned all Japanese aliens & citizens of Japanese descent in detention camps before the Germans applied the same security measures against the Jews of Europe. Moreover, there had been no such evidence or declaration of disloyalty by these Japanese Americans as had been given by Weizmann. The British too, during the Boer War, interned all the women & children of the population and thousands had died as a result, yet in no sense could the British be charged with wanting to “exterminate” the Boers.

The detention of Jews in the occupied territories of Europe served two essential purposes from the German viewpoint. The first was to prevent unrest & subversion; Himmler informed Mussolini on October 11, 1942 that German policy towards the Jews had altered during wartime entirely for reasons of military security. He complained that thousands of Jews in the occupied regions were conducting partisan warfare, sabotage and espionage, a view confirmed by official Soviet information given to Raymond Arthur Davis that no less than 35,000 European Jews were waging partisan war under Tito in Yugoslavia.


As a result, Jews were to be transported to restricted areas & detention camps, both in Germany, and especially after March, 1942, in the Government-General of Poland. As the war proceeded, the policy developed of using Jewish detainees for labor in the war-effort.

The question of labor is fundamental when considering the alleged plan of genocide against the Jews, for on grounds of logic alone the latter would entail the most senseless waste of manpower, time & energy while prosecuting a war of survival on two fronts.

Certainly after the attack on Russia, the idea of compulsory labor had taken precedence over German plans for Jewish emigration.


The protocol of a conversation between Hitler and the Hungarian regent Horthy on April 17, 1943, reveals that the German leader personally requested Horthy to release 100,000 Hungarian Jews for work in the “pursuit-plane programme” of the Luftwaffe at a time when the aerial bombardment of Germany was increasing. This took place at a time when, supposedly, the Germans were already seeking to exterminate the Jews, but Hitler’s request clearly demonstrates the priority aim of expanding his labor force. In harmony with this program, concentration camps became, in fact, industrial complexes.

At every camp where Jews and other nationalities were detained, there were large industrial plants & factories supplying material for the German war-effort; the Buna rubber factory at Bergen-Belsen, Buna & I.G. Farben Industries at Auschwitz and the electrical firm of Siemens at Ravensbrück.

In many cases, special concentration camp money notes were issued as payment for labor, enabling prisoners to buy extra rations from camp shops. The Germans were determined to obtain the maximum economic return from the concentration camp system, an object wholly at variance with any plan to exterminate millions of people in them. It was the function of the SS Economy and Administration Office, headed by Oswald Pohl, to see that the concentration camps became major industrial producers.

Note: The traitor & Rothschild agent, Hjalmar Schacht, who served two terms as head of the Reichsbank, during the Weimar years and after, in the interim, transitional period with Hitler, did “not” oversee the creation of IG Farben. Contrary to popular conspiracy theories, IG Farben was nothing sinister, but the name has been deliberately tainted in the post-war years and used as a trigger to conjure mental images of Xyclon B (delousing agent) & the “Holocaust” (Holohoax), and an emotional state of repulsion. IG Farben was an innovative company. It developed, among other things, synthetic oil that assisted Germany to become self-sufficient & independent. IG Farben was a spin-off from the old, and well established, BASF company. During Schacht’s first term as a President of the Reichsbank in the Weimar years, he approved the loan as “start up capital” for IG Farben which they needed, but he had “no” other involvement.

http://www.renegadetribune.com/its-a...be-fooled-pt1/
 
Old February 26th, 2020 #2
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default

It’s a HOLOHOAX (Don’t Be Fooled) Pt2


February 26, 2020

EMIGRATION WAS STILL FAVORED


It is a remarkable fact, that well into the war period, the Germans continued to implement the policy of Jewish emigration. The fall of France, in 1940, enabled the German Government to open serious negotiations with the French for the transfer of European Jews to Madagascar.

A memorandum of August, 1942 from Luther, Secretary of State in the German Foreign Office, reveals that he had conducted these negotiations between July & December 1940, when they were terminated by the French. A circular from Luther’s department, dated August 15th, 1940, shows that the details of the German plan had been worked out by Eichmann, for it is signed by his assistant, Dannecker. Eichmann had in fact been commissioned in August to draw up a detailed Madagascar Plan, and Dannecker was employed in research on Madagascar at the French Colonial Office.

The proposals of August 15th were that an inter-European bank was to finance the emigration of four million Jews by means of a phased program. Luther’s 1942 memorandum shows that Reinhard Heydrich had obtained Himmler’s approval of this plan before the end of August and had also submitted it to Goering. It certainly met with Hitler’s approval, for as early as June 17th, his interpreter, Schmidt, recalls Hitler observing to Mussolini that “One could found a State of Israel in Madagascar”.

Although the French terminated the Madagascar negotiations in December, 1940, Poliakov, the director of the Centre of Jewish Documentation in Paris, admits that the Germans nevertheless pursued the scheme and that Eichmann was still busy with it throughout 1941.

Eventually, however, the Madagascar emigration plan was rendered impractical by the progress of the war, in particular by the situation after the invasion of Russia, and on February 10th, 1942, the Foreign Office was informed that the plan had been temporarily shelved.

This ruling, sent to the Foreign Office by Luther’s assistant, Rademacher, is of great importance because it demonstrates conclusively that the term “Final Solution” meant only the emigration of Jews, and also that transportation to the eastern ghettos & concentration camps such as Auchwitz constituted nothing but an alternative plan of evacuation.

The directive reads, “The war with the Soviet Union has in the meantime created the possibility of disposing of other territories for the Final Solution. In consequence the Fuehrer has decided that the Jews should be evacuated not to Madagascar but to the East. Madagascar need no longer therefore be considered in connection with the Final Solution”.

On March 7, 1942, Reich Minister of Propaganda, Joseph Goebbels, wrote a memorandum in favor of the Madagascar Plan as a “Final Solution” of the Jewish question. In the meantime, he approved of the Jews being “concentrated in the East.” Later in this memorandum, Goebbels also stressed deportation to the East and laid emphasis on the need for compulsory labor there.

The term “Final Solution” was applied both to Madagascar and to the Eastern territories. Therefore, it meant only the “deportation” of the Jews.

Even as late as May, 1944, the Germans were prepared to allow the emigration of one million European Jews from Europe.

An account of this proposal is given by Alexander Weissberg, a prominent Soviet Jewish scientist deported during the Stalin purges, in his book Die Geschichte von Joel Brand. Weissberg, who spent the war in the city of Cracow, though he expected the Germans to intern him in a concentration camp, explains that on the personal authorization of Himmler, Eichmann had sent the Budapest Jewish leader, Joel Brand, to Istanbul with an offer to the Allies to permit the transfer of one million European Jews in the midst of the war. The Gestapo admitted that the transportation involved would greatly inconvenience the German war-effort but were prepared to allow it in exchange for 10,000 trucks to be used exclusively on the Russian front.

Unfortunately, the plan came to nothing. The British concluded that Brand must be a dangerous agent and immediately imprisoned him in Cairo while the Jewish-controlled press denounced the offer as a “Nazi” trick. Winston Churchill, though orating to the effect that the treatment of the Hungarian Jews was probably “the biggest and most horrible crime ever committed in the whole history of the world” nevertheless told Zionist-leader, Chaim Weizmann, that acceptance of the Brand offer was impossible, since it would be a betrayal of his Russian Allies.

Although the plan was fruitless, it well illustrates that no one allegedly carrying out “thorough” extermination would permit the emigration of a million Jews and it demonstrates, too, the prime importance placed by the Germans on the war-effort.

JEWISH POPULATION STATS & HOLOHOAX MATH


Since statistics relating to Jewish populations are not everywhere known in precise detail, and approximations for various countries differ widely, it is unknown exactly how many Jews were deported & interned at any one time between the years 1939-1945.

In general, however, what reliable statistics there are, especially those relating to emigration, are sufficient to show that not a fraction of six million Jews could have been exterminated.

Here’s a closer look at Jewish emigration…

-The World Jewish Congress, in its publication, “Unity in Dispersion”, stated that “the majority of the German Jews succeeded in leaving (emigrating) Germany before the war broke out.”

-220,000 of 280,000 total Austrian Jews had emigrated by September, 1939.

-From March, 1939, onwards, the Institute for Jewish Emigration in Prague had secured the emigration of 260,000 Jews from former Czechoslovakia.

-An estimated 560,000 had emigrated from Poland prior to the outbreak of war.

-Jewish emigrants from other European countries was 120,000.

-1,550,000 Jews fled (emigrated) to the Soviet Union after 1939. They were later evacuated beyond reach of the German invading troops.

This mass exodus (emigration) of Jews, before & during hostilities, left approximately 3.5 million people Jews in German-controlled Europe.

Here’s a look at Jewish world population statistics…

-World Almanac, 1929, 15,630,000 Jews worldwide

-National Council of Churches,1930, 15,600,000 Jews worldwide

-Jewish newspaper, Daily Express, 1933, 14,000,000 Jews worldwide

-World Almanac, 1933, 15,316,359 Jews worldwide

-World Almanac, 1936, 15,753,633 Jews worldwide

-World Almanac, 1938, 15,748,091 Jews worldwide with 240,000 in Germany

-American Jewish Committee Bureau of the Synagogue Council, 1939, 15,600,000 Jews worldwide

-World Almanac, 1940, 15,319,359 Jews worldwide

-World Almanac, 1941, 15,748,091 Jews worldwide

-World Almanac, 1942, 15,192,089 Jews worldwide

-World Almanac USA, 1947, 15,690,000 Jews worldwide

-World Almanac, 1949, 15,713,638 Jews worldwide

-Statistical Handbook of Council of Churches USA, 1951, 15,300,000 Jews worldwide

What happened to the supposed 6 Million Jews that died in the Holocaust? It’s a #Holohoax!

RUSSIAN JEWS EVACUATED


The precise figures concerning Russian Jews are unknown and have therefore been the subject of extreme exaggeration. The Jewish statistician Jacob Leszczynski, states that in 1939 there were 2,100,000 Jews living in future German-occupied western Russia. In addition, some 260,000 lived in the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.

According to Loui Levine, President of the American Jewish Council for Russian Relief, who made a post-war tour of the Soviet Union and submitted a report on the status of Jews there, the majority of these Jews were evacuated east after the German armies launched their invasion, Operation Barbarossa.

The Jewish journalist, David Bergelson, wrote in the Moscow Yiddish paper “Ainikeit”, in 1942, that “thanks to the evacuation, the majority (80%) of the Jews in the Ukraine, White Russia, Lithuania and Latvia before the arrival of the Germans were rescued.”

What happened to the Soviet Jews that did remain in German territory? In the war between Germany & Russia, no more than one hundred thousand persons were killed by the German Action Groups as military targets, “partisans” & “Bolshevik commissars”. By contrast, the partisans themselves claimed to have murdered five times that number of German troops.

SIX MILLION IS UNTRUE


The Germans could not possibly have gained control over, or exterminate, anything like Six Million Jews. Excluding the Soviet Union, the number of Jews in German-occupied Europe after emigration was scarcely more than three million, by no means all of whom were interned.

To approach the extermination of even half of Six Million would have meant the liquidation of every Jew living in Europe. And yet it is known that large numbers of Jews were alive in Europe after 1945.

THE “SIX MILLION” NUMBER


Quote:
Dr. Levin, in the course of his talk, expressed the opinion that six million Jews of Eastern Europe are doomed to perish.” -Jewish Telegraphic Agency (1930)
Ben Weintraub’s 1995 book, “Holocaust Dogma of Judaism”, fully explores & explains the Kabalistic Gematria & occultism involved in the “6 million” number.

Quote:
6,000,000 is the number of perfect souls times ten, and ten is number of the Sephiroth, the divine emanations of God as seen in the Kabala.” –Ben Weintraub
The mystical “6 million” number, to the Jewish Kabalists, is numerologically predetermined, supernaturally imbued with dark power. As a result, it can never, ever be changed. This is critical, central to the Kabalist hex (spell). 6,000,000 is the number! It must be ritually repeated & publicly acknowledged.

Quote:
This is called the purple earth. It shines with every kind of light that proceeds from hashmal. In this earth are sunk twelve thousand myriads of pearls, sunk in this earth and reaching as far as the eastern gate. There there are six million open gates, and Anael is the chief guardian of them.” -Zohar Hadash, Yitro, 38d
The “6 million” number does not refer to actual deaths. It is a purely symbolic, esoteric, mystical number, symbolizing the perfect result, a perfect creation, a magical (Masonic) Great Work in progress.

The Torah requires that 6 million Jews must “vanish” before the state of Israel can be formed. It is written, “You shall return minus 6 million.”

Israeli historian, Tom Segev, stated that the “6 million” number is an attempt to transform the Holocaust story into a state religion. Those 6 million “had” to disappear in “burning ovens”, according to Jewish prophecy, which the judicial version of the Holocaust (Holohoax) story now authenticates.

Quote:
Without the Holocaust, there would be no Jewish State.” -Robert B. Goldmann (Jewish author)
The missing 6 million Jews must be so, before the Jews can return to the Promised Land. Yahweh sees this as a cleaning of the souls of the sinful people. The Jews must, on the return to the Promised Land, be clean; the cleaning shall be done in burning stokes. A holocaust!

AN IMPOSSIBLE BIRTH RATE


Indisputable evidence is also provided by the post-war world Jewish population statistics. The World Almanac of 1938 gives the number of Jews in the world as 16,588,259. But after the war the New York Times, February 22, 1948, placed the number of Jews in the world at a minimum of 15,000,000 and a maximum of 18,000,000.

Quite obviously, these figures make it impossible for the number of Jewish war-time casualties to be measured in anything but thousands. Fifteen and a half million in 1938 minus the alleged six million leaves nine million; the New York Times figures would mean, therefore, that the world’s Jews produced seven million births, almost doubling their numbers, in the space of ten years. This is patently ridiculous.

It would appear therefore that the great majority of the missing “six million” were in fact emigrants. These were emigrants to European countries, to the Soviet Union and the United States before, during and after the war. In addition, there were emigrants, in vast numbers, who emigrated to Palestine during and especially at the end of the war.

After 1945, boat-loads of Jewish survivors entered Palestine illegally from Europe, causing considerable embarrassment to the British Government of the time. It was these emigrants to all parts of the world who had swollen the world Jewish population to between 15 and 18 million by 1948, and probably the greatest part of them were emigrants to the United States who entered in violation of the quota laws.

Many Jewish emigrants to the United States changed their names to hide their Jewish identity. Could it be that some or all of these people whose Jewish names were “eliminated” were included in the missing Six Million of Europe?

ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE


There is not a single document in existence which proves that the Germans intended to, or carried out, the deliberate murder of Jews.

The final details of the plan to “exterminate” Jews were supposed to have been made at a conference at Grosse Wannsee in Berlin on January 20th, 1942, presided over by Reinhard Heydrich. Officials of all German Ministries were present, and Heinrich Muller & Adolf Eichmann represented the Gestapo Head Office. The minutes of this conference is supposed to prove the existence of a genocide plan, but the truth is that no such plan was even mentioned.

Per the “Holocaust” story, the minutes are shrouded in a form of officialdom that cloaks the real significance of the words & terminology that are used. However, what the memorandum clearly reveals is that Reinhard Heydrich commissioned by Hermann Goering to arrange a “solution” to the Jewish problem. Reinhard reviewed the history of Jewish emigration and stated that the war had rendered the Madagascar project impractical. Thus, the emigration program had been replaced by the evacuation of Jews to the East as a further possible “solution”, in accordance with the previous authorization of the Fuhrer, Adolf Hitler.

The memorandum went on to explain that in the East the use of Jewish labor was to be utilized. This meant, the concentration of the Jews for labor in the immense eastern ghetto of the Polish Government-General. There, the Jews were to wait until the end of the war, for the re-opening of international discussions which would decide their future.

The Germans had an extraordinary propensity for recording everything on paper in the most careful detail, yet among the thousands of captured documents of the S.D. & Gestapo, the records of the Reich Security Head Office, the files of Himmler’s headquarters and Hitler’s own war directives there is not a single order for the extermination of Jews or anyone else.

Note: It is widely claimed by Holocaust (Holohoax) proponents that the use of the world “resettlement” in the Wannsee minutes meant “murder”, but there is no evidence for this allegation in the document.

Note: The Wannsee Conference plans to resettle Jews in the far east of Russia fell into chaos when the expected military victory against the Soviet Union did not occur, and soon the camps in Poland were overcrowded.


http://www.renegadetribune.com/its-a...be-fooled-pt2/
 
Old February 29th, 2020 #3
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default

It HOLOHOAX (Don’t be Fooled) Pt3


February 28, 2020

NUREMBERG TRIALS = 6 MILLION CLAIM


The story of Six Million Jews being exterminated during the war was given judicial authority at the Nuremberg Trials, which were show trials of German leaders between 1945 and 1949, proceedings which proved to be the most disgraceful legal farce in history. According to Field Marshal Montgomery, these trials made it a crime to lose a war.

The story of Six Million was given final authority at the Nuremberg Trials by the statement of Dr. Wilhelm Hoettl. He had been an assistant of Adolf Eichmann’s but was in fact a rather strange person in the service of American Intelligence who had written several books under the pseudonym of Walter Hagen. Hoettl also worked for Soviet espionage, collaborating with two Jewish emigrants from Vienna, Perger & Verber, who acted as U.S. officers during the preliminary inquiries of the Nuremberg Trials.

It is remarkable that the testimony of this highly dubious person & spy, Dr. Wilhelm Hoettl, is said to constitute the only “proof” regarding the murder of Six Million Jews. In his affidavit of November 26th, 1945, he stated, not that he knew but that Eichmann had “told him” in August 1944, in Budapest, that a total of 6 million Jews had been exterminated. Needless to say, Eichmann never corroborated this claim at his trial. Hoettl was working as an American spy during the whole of the latter period of the war and it is therefore very odd indeed that he never gave the slightest hint to the Americans of a policy to murder Jews, even though he worked directly under Heydrich & Eichmann.

From the very outset the Nuremberg Trials proceeded on the basis of gross statistical errors. In his speech of indictment on November 20th, 1945, Mr. Sidney Alderman declared that there had been 9,600,000 Jews living in German occupied Europe. This figure was wildly inaccurate. It could only be arrived at by completely ignoring all Jewish emigration between 1933 and 1945 and by adding all the Jews of Russia, including the two million or more who were never in German-occupied territory.

LEGAL PRINCIPLES IGNORED AT THE NUREMBERG TRIALS


Should anyone be misled into believing that the extermination of the Jews was “proved” at Nuremberg by “evidence” they should consider the nature of the trials themselves, based as they were on a total disregard of sound legal principles of any kind. The victors were putting on trial the vanquished.

Among the “victors” were their judges, some of which were Russian, whose country was behind numberless crimes, included the massacre of 15,000 Polish officers, a proportion of whose bodies were discovered by the Germans at Katyn Forest, near Smolensk. The Soviet Prosecutor attempted to blame this Katyn Forest slaughter on the German defendants.

During the Nuremberg Trials, ex post facto legislation was created, whereby men were tried for “crimes”, which were only declared crimes after they had been allegedly committed. The Rules of Evidence, developed by British jurisprudence over the centuries in order to arrive at the truth of a charge with as much certainty as possible, were entirely disregarded at Nuremberg.

It was decreed that “the Tribunal should not be bound by technical rules of evidence” but could admit “any evidence which it deemed to have probative value,” that is, would support a conviction. In practice this meant the admittance of hearsay evidence & documents, which in a normal judicial trial are always rejected as untrustworthy. That such evidence was allowed is of profound significance because it was one of the principal methods by which the “extermination” of Six Million Jews legend was fabricated through fraudulent written affidavits.

At the trails, any Jewish deportee or camp inmate could make any revengeful allegation that he pleased. The defendants were not permitted to personally cross-examine prosecution witnesses.

The real background of the Nuremberg Trials was exposed by the American Judge, Justice Wenerstrum, president of one of the Tribunals. He was so disgusted by the proceedings that he resigned his appointment and flew home to America, leaving behind a statement to the Chicago Tribune which enumerated point by point his objections to the trials.

Per Justice Wenestrum…

-The members of the department of the Public Prosecutor were moved by personal ambition & revenge.

-The prosecution did its utmost in every way possible to prevent the defense from preparing its case and to make it impossible for them to furnish evidence.

-Ninety percent of the Nuremberg Court consisted of biased persons who, either on political or racial grounds, furthered the prosecution’s case.

-The prosecution obviously knew how to fill all the administrative posts of the Military Court with “Americans” (Jews) whose naturalization certificates were very new indeed, and who, whether in the administrative service or by their translations, etc., created an atmosphere hostile to the accused persons.

Quote:
60% of the staff of the Public Prosecutor’s Office were German Jews who had left Germany after the promulgation of Hitler’s Race Laws.” -Earl Carrol (American lawyer)
-The real aim of the Nuremberg Trials (show trial) was to show the Germans the (alleged) crimes of their Fuehrer (Hitler).

It is obvious from these facts that the fundamental legal principle, “that no man can sit in judgment on his own case”, was abandoned altogether. Worse, the majority of witnesses were also Jews, when only a minority of the concentration camp inmates had been Jewish.

Quote:
The only concern of these witnesses was not to show their hatred too openly, and to try and give an impression of objectivity.” -Professor Maurice Bardache (trial observer at Nuremberg)
NUREMBERG “CONFESSIONS” UNDER TORTURE


Altogether more disturbing than legal principles being ignored, however, were the methods employed to extract statements & “confessions” at Nuremberg, particularly those from SS officers which were used to support the “extermination” charge.

Quote:
Strong men were reduced to broken wrecks, ready to mumble any admission demanded by their prosecutors.” -Judge Van Roden
The American Senator, Joseph McCarthy, in a statement given to the American Press on May 20th, 1949, drew attention to the following cases of torture to secure such confessions.

McCarthy stated, “In the prison of Swabisch Hall, officers of the SS Leibstandarte-Adolf Hitler were flogged until they were soaked in blood, after which their sexual organs were trampled on as they lay prostrate on the ground.” As in the notorious Malmedy Trials of private soldiers, the prisoners were hoisted in the air and beaten until they signed the confessions demanded of them. On the basis of such “confessions” extorted from SS Generals Sepp Dietrich & Joachim Peiper, the Leibstandarte was convicted as a “guilty organization”.[/B]

Senator McCarthy told the Press…

“I have heard evidence and read documentary proofs to the effect that the accused persons were beaten up, maltreated and physically tortured by methods which could only be conceived in sick brains. They were subjected to mock trials and pretended executions, they were told their families would be deprived of their ration cards. All these things were carried out with the approval of the Public Prosecutor in order to secure the psychological atmosphere necessary for the extortion of the required confessions. If the United States lets such acts committed by a few people go unpunished, then the whole world can rightly criticize us severely and forever doubt the correctness of our motives and our moral integrity.”

The methods of intimidation described were repeated during trials at Frankfurt-am-Main and at Dachau, and large numbers of Germans were convicted for atrocities on the basis of their admissions.

The American Judge Edward L. Van Roden, one of the three members of the Simpson Army Commission which was subsequently appointed to investigate the methods of justice at the Dachau trials, revealed the methods by which these admissions were secured in the Washington Daily News, in 1949. His account also appeared in the British newspaper, the Sunday Pictorial.

The methods Van Roden described were, “Posturing as priests to hear confessions and give absolution; torture with burning matches driven under the prisoners fingernails; knocking out of teeth and breaking jaws; solitary confinement and near starvation rations.” He further explained, “The statements which were admitted as evidence were obtained from men who had first been kept in solitary confinement for three, four and five months… The investigators would put a black hood over the accused’s head and then punch him in the face with brass knuckles, kick him and beat him with rubber hoses… All but two of the Germans, in the 139 cases we investigated, had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair. This was standard operating procedure with our (Jewish) American investigators.”

Despite the fact that “confessions” pertaining to the extermination of the Jews were extracted under these brutal & inhumane conditions, Nuremberg statements are still regarded as conclusive evidence for the Six Million Jews exterminated figure.

AUSCHWITZ WAS NOT A DEATH CAMP


The Auschwitz concentration camp in Poland has remained at the centre of the alleged “extermination” of millions of Jews. When it was discovered by honest observers in the British & American zones after the war that no “gas chambers” existed in the German camps, such as Dachau & Bergen-Belsen, attention was shifted to the eastern camps, particularly Auschwitz.

The eastern camps were in the Russian zone of occupation, so no one could verify whether these allegations were true or not.

The Russians controlled access by foreigners to Auschwitz for about ten years after the war, by which time they were able to alter its appearance and give some plausibility to the claim that millions of people had been exterminated there.

Holocaust “expert”, Dr. Raul Hilberg admitted during the Ernst Zundel trial in Toronto, that the Auschwitz “gas chamber” was “modified for touristic and educational reasons.”

If anyone doubts that the Russians are capable of such deception, they should remember the monument erected for the thousands of Poles who were murdered in Russia, supposedly victims of German troops in World War Two, in reality they were killed by Stalin’s secret police.

The truth about Auschwitz is that it was the largest and most important industrial concentration camp, producing all kinds of material for the war industry. The camp consisted of synthetic coal & rubber plants built by I.G. Farben, for whom the prisoners supplied labor. Auschwitz also comprised an agricultural research station, with laboratories, plant nurseries and facilities for stock breeding, as well as Krupps armament works.

Accounts of visits by Heinrich Himmler to the camps show that his main purpose was to inspect & assess their industrial efficiency. When he visited Auschwitz in March, 1941, accompanied by high executives of I.G. Farben, he showed no interest in the problems of the camp as a facility for prisoners, but merely ordered that the camp be enlarged to take 100,000 detainees to supply labor for I.G. Farben. This hardly accords with a policy of “exterminating” Jewish prisoners by the millions.

Nevertheless, at this single camp Polish camp, Auschwitz, half of the Six Million Jews were supposed to have been exterminated; indeed, some writers claim 4 or even 5 million.

Four million was the sensational figure announced by the Soviet Government after the Communists had “investigated” the camp, at the same time as they were attempting to blame the Katyn massacre on the Germans.

Information regarding Auschwitz and other eastern camps came from the post-war murderous & deceptive Communist regimes of Eastern Europe. However, no living, authentic eye-witness of these “gassings” has ever been produced & validated.

The exterminations at Auschwitz are alleged to have occurred between March 1942 and October 1944; the figure of half of six million, therefore, would mean the extermination & disposal of about 94,000 people per month for thirty-two months, approximately 3,350 people every day, day & night, for over two and a half years. This is scientifically & forensically impossible, as proven by the many revisionist researchers & scientists, many of which have been jail & imprisoned for their Holohoax disclosure.


The Auschwitz camp was simply a vital war production center which, while admittedly employing the compulsory labor of detainees, was certainly not a place of “mass extermination”.

AUSCHWITZ WAS A WORK CAMP

Auschwitz was picked as a work camp because it was a railway center where synthetic rubber, medical and armament supplies were produced.

Auschwitz was the site of Germany’s newest and most technologically advanced synthetic rubber plant; and Germany was the world’s leader in this particular field of technology. Shortly after the war, the Germans were cut off from their supply of natural rubber. In the months that followed they set about building their own synthetic rubber plants.

Auschwitz was a major work camp that had forty different industries. The Monowitz industrial complex, where most of Auschwitz’s inmates were put to work in a variety of heavy industries, ranging from rubber manufacture, medical supplies, armaments and clothing.

Here is a factual list of facilities & services available to prisoners at the camp, most of which can still be seen in the camp today, including the cinema, swimming pool, hospital, library and post office.

Take a tour…

Camp Dental Facilities, attended by camp inmate dentists & nurses to deal with the inmates’ dental problems. Before the war there 43% of Germany’s dentists were Jewish.

Camp Sick Barracks, attended by camp inmate doctors & nurses to deal with the inmates’ health problems, much like the now common walk-in clinics. A camp hospital to which expert surgeons even from the famous Berlin “Charite” Surgical Clinic were dispatched to deal with difficult cases.

Camp Diet Kitchen, one of the largest service buildings in Auschwitz, with state-of-the-art cooking facilities. The caloric content of the diet was carefully monitored by camp & Red Cross delegates. It only deteriorated in Auschwitz and other camps towards the end of the war when German railroads and the entire transport system collapsed under constant aerial attack.

Camp Orchestras, there were up to 16 of them in total, with every conceivable instrument available.

Camp Theater, where live plays could be performed by camp inmate actors.

Camp Sculpture Classes, conducted for both interested & talented inmates by professional sculptors.

Camp Art Classes, for anyone interested.

Camp University, with lectures on every topic under the sun, from health, the arts, philosophy, science, economic issues, etc.

Camp Cinema, where every week different, mainly cultural & non-political films were shown.

Camp Brothel, in which 12-15 women were paid between RM 2. to RM 4. for their services. The women & customers were given medical checks before each visit.

Camp Library, where inmates could borrow books, with an inventory of 45,000 books available.

Camp Religious Facilities, made available on a rotating basis to every denomination for religious services.

Camp Swimming Pool, where there were walkways with comfortable benches for inmates to relax in the shade of the trees.

Camp Sports Facilities, like soccer fields, handball areas, fencing classes and other exercise facilities.

Camp Cantina, which utilized a coupon incentive system. Through extra work, inmates could obtain coupons redeemable for snack & toiletry items.

Camp Complaints Office, where inmates could register complaints or make suggestions. Camp Commander Hoess had a standing order that any inmate could approach him personally to register a complaint about other inmates such as “Kapos” and even guards. A system of strict discipline for guards & inmates was in place, with severe punishment being handed out against those found guilty. Slapping an inmate was considered a punishable offense.

Camp Marriage Certificates for Auschwitz marriages, as worker inmates fell in love and married their inmate partners. Child day care center where working mothers could leave their children.

Camp Maternity Ward, over 3,000 live births were registered, with not a single infant death while Auschwitz was in operation under German rule.

Camp Child Care Center, where working mothers can leave their children during working hours.

Camp Court & Jail, since the camp was a large, open facility, transgressors could be arrested, tried and jailed right in Auschwitz.

Camp Currency, Auschwitz issued its own money.

Camp Crematoria, these structures were hastily built by inmate labor after the first typhus epidemic caused thousands of deaths. Burial of epidemic victims had caused the groundwater to be contaminated, causing infections among the German staff. Amongst the victims was an early camp commandant’s wife. Polish peasants from the surrounding district were also cremated here.

Camp Post Office, with twice weekly pick-ups & deliveries.

Camp Sauna, for stress-reduction & enjoyment.

Camp Museum, with 1470 paintings on display

http://www.renegadetribune.com/it-ho...be-fooled-pt3/
 
Old March 2nd, 2020 #4
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default

It’s a HOLOHOAX (Don’t Be Fooled) Pt4


March 2, 2020

TREBLINKA WAS A TRANSIT CAMP


Holocaust (Holohoax) survivors report that at least 700,000, and perhaps as many as three million, people primarily of Jewish faith were murdered in the Treblinka camp, located in Eastern Poland, between the summers of 1942 and 1943. Their bodies were alleged to have been buried in mass graves.

Various murder weapons are claimed, yet no forensic evidence provided to have been used; mobile or stationary gas chambers, quicklime, hot steam, high voltage electricity, machine guns, vacuum chambers, chlorine gas, Zyklon B and diesel exhaust gas.

The “eyewitness” testimony & accounts that exist, in regard to the Treblinka group of camps, are completely contradictory of each other. The witness claims diverge so widely; not only where the numbers of victims are concerned, but also with respect to the alleged methods of killing, about the way the bodies and evidence were eliminated, and about the location, size, form and equipment of the alleged extermination camp, that it is impossible to cull a plausible overall account.

No evidence of victims has ever surfaced. The elimination of victims without a trace is a vital link in the chain of evidence for the Holocaust (Holohoax) in general. Elimination without a trace is the prerequisite for an arbitrary number of victims. This is how the numbers of victims alleged for Treblinka come to vary from 700,000 to 3 million, a phenomenon that also appears in other Holohoax-related cases.

The technically unrealistic claims regarding the mass murder of human beings are compounded by the utterly unbelievable accounts of the removal of bodies without any trace. Millions of dead cannot simply vanish into thin air.

A detailed forensic examination of the Treblinka camp, using sophisticated electronic ground radar, has found “no evidence” of mass graves there. For six days in October 1999, an Australian forensics team headed by Richard Krege, a qualified electronics engineer, carried out an examination of the soil at the site of the former Treblinka II camp in Poland.

According to Krege, “Historians say that the bodies were exhumed & cremated toward the end of the Treblinka camp’s use in 1943, but we found no indication that any mass graves ever existed.”

German aerial reconnaissance photographs taken in 1944 of the Treblinka camp also cast serious doubts on the widely accepted Holohoax story that Treblinka was a mass extermination center. Discovered in 1989 in the National Archives in Washington, D.C., these photographs corroborate other evidence indicating that Treblinka was actually a transit camp.

The photographs indicate that Treblinka was an extremely small camp. The camp’s burial area is too small to contain the hundreds of thousands of bodies supposedly buried there. Treblinka was not particularly well guarded or isolated. The aerial photographs show that fields where Polish farmers planted & cultivated crops were directly adjacent to the camp perimeter, and were cultivated right up to the edge of the camp.

John C. Ball, a geologist with experience interpreting aerial photographs, has reviewed the wartime aerial photos taken of Treblinka, Belzec and Sobibor. Ball concludes, “To this day there is no air photo evidence to support the alleged mass murder of the Jews at ‘any location’ in Europe occupied by the Germans during World War Two. Further, air photo analysis refutes the claim that the ‘Nazis’ had intended, at whatever time, to keep events, in the alleged extermination camps, secret.”

Walter Luftl, a court-recognized expert engineer who headed a large engineering firm in Vienna, concludes in his report that the stories of gas chambers with diesel engines & gas vans at places such as Treblinka can only be disinformation. Luftl stated, “The laws of nature apply both to Nazis and anti-Fascists. Nobody can be killed with ‘diesel exhaust gas’ in the manner described (in the Holocaust literature).”

There is no compelling evidence that the Aktion Reinhardt camps, of Bełzec, Sobibor and Treblinka, were extermination centers in which Jews were systematically put to death.

The Aktion Reinhardt camps were transit camps rather than extermination camps. The demographic studies, the numerous statements from Heinrich Himmler, the reports of transfers of Jews from the Aktion Reinhardt camps to Auschwitz & Majdanek, the lack of credible forensic evidence that mass exterminations occurred at the camps, the photographic and engineering evidence, the impossibility of disposing of so many bodies in such a short period of time, the relative lack of secrecy & security in the camps, and the small size of the areas where the bodies were supposedly buried all indicate that the Aktion Reinhardt camps were transit camps.


“ENIGMA” CODE CRACKED


In 1941, British Intelligence analysts cracked the German “Enigma” code, with the probable secret assistance of traitors within the German aristocratic class. This undermined the German war effort, but also threw new light on day-by-day events in the National Socialist concentration camp system.

Between January 1942 and January 1943, encrypted radio communications between those camps and the Berlin headquarters were intercepted & decrypted. To keep the Holohoax going, historians have largely ignored the information furnished in these intercepts relating to “arrivals”, “departures”, recorded deaths and other events at these camps.

The only reasonable explanation for this embarrassing omission is that the intercepted “Enigma” code data seriously contradicts, even refutes, the orthodox “Holocaust” (Holohoax) narrative. The revealed information does not expose a program of mass murder & racial genocide. Quite the opposite; it reveals that the Germans were determined, even desperate, to reduce the death rate in their work camps, which was caused by catastrophic typhus epidemics.

Note: Operation Ultra was the codename for the British cryptologists efforts at Bletchley Park to intercept & break German coded messages. While Ultra initially was the cryptonym for the project to break the German Enigma machine, the code name came to represent all British efforts to break high-level German radio codes during World War 2.

Note: In 1943, the British finally cracked the code to access German naval activities.


SCHINDLER’S LIST IS FICTION

Steven Spielberg’s mendacious (lying) anti-German libel, “Schindler’s List,” is based upon a novel, a work of fiction, titled in its first edition, “Schindler’s Ark”, by the Australian writer, Thomas Keneally. Keneally’s work is riddled with errors and “Holocaust” extermination narratives. There are certain aspects of Keneally’s book that Spielberg omitted from the movie. Keneally mentioned that Schindler worked for the powerful Hungarian Jew, Rudolf Kastner.

Nowhere will this information be found in the “Schindler’s List” movie, because in 1944, Kastner helped Eichmann deport hundreds of thousands of Jews to Auschwitz, in return for favorable treatment for Kastner’s Zionist cronies. The fact of high level cooperation between National Socialists & Zionists was too embarrassing to be included in Spielberg’s pro-Zionist film.

There are many instances of attempts by the German military to secure humane conditions within the concentration camps.

For example, in 1943, SS Judge Konrad Morgen of the Haupt Amt Gericht (SS-HAG) was assigned to investigate and prosecute brutality at Buchenwald. Morgen was so successful in correcting conditions there that Heinrich Himmler gave him an expanded staff and unlimited investigative authority in the camps. Morgen’s next target of inquiry was Krakau-Plaszow and its commandant, Amon Goeth, the arch-fiend of Spielberg’s film.

In “Schindler’s List”, Morgen’s entire investigation of Goeth was reduced to a scene in which fleeting reference is made to Goeth having his books “audited”.

The crucial truth that Steven Spielberg intentionally withheld from his gullible audience is that in September of 1944, Goeth was arrested by the Central Office of the SS Judiciary and imprisoned on charges of theft and the murder of concentration camp inmates. Spielberg was certainly aware of this fact, since the arrest is mentioned in Chapter 31 of Keneally’s book, upon which the movie is allegedly based.

Spielberg whitewashes the guilt of the Ordnungdienst (OD), the Jewish ghetto police, who worked for the National Socialists. Though occasionally shown taking bribes and helping the Germans control Jewish crowds, their main role in the movie is that of bystanders & traffic monitors. In real life however, many OD were ruthless killers.

Toward the end of the movie, Schindler is shown being presented with an inscribed gold ring by the Jews he rescued. We are told that the inscription is from the Talmud, “He who saves a single life, saves the entire world.” The saying has a nice, warm, humanistic tenor, but that’s not what the Talmud says.

The actual Talmud verse states, “Whosoever preserves a single soul (a Jew) of Israel, Scripture ascribes to him as if he had preserved a complete world” (Tractate Sanhedrin 37a). The Talmud only praises the saving of Jewish lives. In Spielberg’s non-stop Hollywood deception, even the documented contents of sacred Jewish texts are falsified.

Much has been made of the supposed “conciliatory nature” of Schindler’s List because it shows exactly two Germans, the Schindler couple, acting decently. However it depicts every member of the German military as either a monster or a homicidal robot. The perpetuation of this false stereotype constitutes “hate” propaganda, and is anti-White.

“Schindler’s List” is more sophisticated than other “Holocaust” propaganda films, having been crafted by the most successful director in Hollywood, who is clever enough to give his villains some characteristics of self-doubt, complaint and fatigue. But the film is nonetheless historically fraudulent. It is fiction!

This film has been shown in many children’s classrooms in the West and is portrayed as historically accurate. This is pure Zionist-occupied government propaganda that needs to be debunked and thrown in the garbage, along with other anti-White Hollywood trash, like Inglourious Basterds & Django Unchained.

ANNE FRANK BEST-SELLER IS A FRAUD

Of the many Jewish (fictional) memoirs that present a picture of frail Jewry caught in the vice of Nazism, the most celebrated is undoubtedly the Anne Frank Diary and the truth concerning this book provides insight into how a propaganda legend is fabricated and cashed in.

Tucked away on pages 119 and 122 of the October 6th issue of Der Spiegel, a weekly German news magazine comparable to Time or Newsweek, was a news item of considerable significance. A scientific analysis of the manuscript purported to be the original diary of Anne Frank, a Jewish girl who died in a German concentration camp during the Second World War, has revealed that the manuscript could not have been written before 1951, six years after the end of the war.

The exposure of the Anne Frank forgery is important because of the sheer magnitude of the fraud and the key role it has played in underpinning the entire Jewish scenario of the war. What is known as a fact is that Otto Frank, a Jewish merchant, formerly of Frankfurt, who had been arrested in the Netherlands and interned in the Auschwitz concentration camp during the war, began visiting publishers in 1946 with what he claimed was a diary written by his young daughter during the time the Frank family was hiding from the German police in occupied Holland. The girl later perished at Auschwitz, Frank said.

The diary, filled with touching adolescent reveries and homely little anecdotes, was exactly what the Jewish “Holocaust” propagandists were looking for, in order to generate tearfully sentimental & emotion-laden sympathy for the “persecuted” Jews, as typified by Anne Frank, and generate hatred against the wicked Germans, who had killed her and “Six Million” other Jews.

Otto Frank cashed in on the diary in a big way. Not only did he find a publisher, but he found people hot to buy stage & film rights as well. Shortly after its appearance in book form, the diary had been translated into a score of languages and printed in millions of copies, from all of which Frank received royalties. The English version alone, under the title “Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl”, has sold more than 4,000,000 copies to date. A television dramatization based on the diary was aired in the United States as well.

Almost from the beginning there were charges that the diary was a hoax. Some of these charges were based on the gross inconsistencies between various translations & editions of the diary in book form; it was clear that the text had been heavily edited to help it sell well in different international markets. Other charges were based on internal inconsistencies and credulity-straining elements in the diary itself.

Otto Frank was sued by a New York scriptwriter, Meyer Levin, who claimed that Frank had taken large portions of a script that he had written and had not paid Levin for his work. The court ordered Frank to pay Levin $50,000. One can easily understand why some observers began to wonder how much, if any, of the content of the various Anne Frank books, films, and plays in circulation was actually written by a little Jewish girl named Anne Frank.

When Hamburg pensioner, Ernst Roemer, age 76, began spreading the accusation that Otto Frank had himself written what he was passing off as his dead daughter’s diary, Frank sued him. As usual, the German court upheld the authenticity of the diary. Handwriting experts testified that the entire diary, including loose notes & insertions, had been written by the same hand, and that hand was Anne Frank’s.

Roemer appealed the court’s decision against him, and more handwriting experts were called in. Their conclusion was the same; everything in the diary was in the same handwriting; there was no forgery.

Roemer appealed again, and this time the court asked for the technical services of the Federal Criminal Office, the Bundeskriminalamt, which carried out a careful analysis of the original manuscript of the diary with microscope & ultraviolet illumination in order to confirm its authenticity, and determine when it was written.

The report of the technical experts was given to the court and it contained a bombshell; large portions of the alleged “diary” were written in ballpoint pen ink, which was not manufactured prior to 1951.

Were it not for the previous testimony of the handwriting experts that the entire diary, including the portions written with ballpoint pen, is in the same hand, the father might have claimed that he only “edited” his daughter’s work, “clarifying” passages here and there. But the evidence was quite unambiguous.

It is now quite clear that Otto finished up the “original” of the diary after he had found a publisher in 1946. At that time, his original was nothing more than some rough notes and an idea in his head, which seemed to have prospects for making him a lot of money with little effort. First a typescript for the publisher, and then, as sales of the book began to mount, a completed handwritten “original” to show to doubters.

Just after the report of the Federal Criminal Office was given to the court, Otto Frank conveniently died, before he could be asked a number of very interesting questions. Meanwhile, the worldwide Jewish propaganda apparatus has continued its promotion of the Anne Frank myth as if nothing had happened. Der Spiegel seems to be the only mass-circulation news periodical to have exposed the fraud to date.

QUESTIONS NEED TO BE ASKED


In his book, “Adolf Hitler”, the author, Colin Cross, who brought more intelligence than is usual to the many problems of this period of history, observed astutely that “the shuffling of millions of Jews around Europe and murdering them, in a time of desperate war emergency, was useless from any rational point of view.”

Is it likely, that, at the height of the war, when the Germans were fighting a desperate battle for survival on two fronts, they would have conveyed millions of Jews for miles to supposedly elaborate and costly slaughter houses? To have conveyed three or four million Jews to Auschwitz alone would have placed an insuperable burden upon German transportation facilities, which were already strained to the limit supporting the far-flung Russian front. To have transported the mythical Six Million Jews and countless numbers of other nationalities to internment camps, and to have housed, clothed and fed them there, would simply have paralyzed their military operations. There is no reason to suppose that the efficient Germans would have put their military fortunes at such risk.

On the other hand, the transportation of a reasonable 363,000 prisoners, the number officially known by the Germans to have been registered there, to Auschwitz in the course of the war, at least makes sense in terms of the compulsory labor they supplied to assist the war effort. In fact, of the 3 million Jewish people living in German-occupied Europe, it is certain that no more than two million were ever interned at one time, and it is probable that the number was much closer to 1,500,000.

Per the Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross, whole Jewish populations, such as that of Slovakia, avoided detention in camps, while others were placed in community ghettos like Theresienstadt. Moreover, from Western Europe deportations were far fewer.


Another question that must also be asked is how can millions of Jewish people be eliminated without a trace in six months? Could such enormous gatherings of Jews and executions on such a vast scale have been kept secret? These are the kind of questions that the critical, thinking person should ask. And he will soon discover that not only the statistical & documentary evidence known to Holocaust revisionists, but simple logistics combine to discredit the legend of the Six Million.

Although it was impossible for millions to have been murdered in them, the nature & conditions of Germany’s concentration camps have been vastly exaggerated to make the claim plausible.

http://www.renegadetribune.com/its-a...be-fooled-pt4/

Last edited by alex revision; March 2nd, 2020 at 11:29 PM.
 
Old March 4th, 2020 #5
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default

It’s a HOLOHOAX (Don’t Be Fooled) Pt5


March 4, 2020

“NAZI DEATH CAMPS”


It is true that in 1945, Allied propaganda did claim that all the concentration camps, particularly those in Germany itself, were “Death Camps,” but not for long. On this question the American historian Professor Harry Elmer Barnes wrote, “These camps were first presented as those in Germany, such as Dachau, Belsen, Buchenwald, Sachsenhausen and Dora, but it was soon demonstrated that there had been no systematic extermination in those camps. Attention was then moved to Auschwitz, Treblinka, Belzec, Chelmno, Jonowska, Tarnow, Ravensbruck, Mauthausen, Brezeznia and Birkenau, which does not exhaust the list that appears to have been extended as needed.”

What had happened was that certain honest observers among the British & American occupation forces in Germany, while admitting that many camp inmates had died of disease & starvation in the final months of the war, had found no evidence after all of “gas chambers.”

As a result, eastern camps in the Russian zone of occupation, such as Auschwitz & Treblinka, gradually came to the fore as horrific centers of “extermination”, though no one was permitted to see them. This tendency has lasted almost to the present day.


Here in these camps it was all supposed to have happened, but with the Iron Curtain brought down firmly over them it was difficult to verify such charges. The Communists claimed that four million people died at Auschwitz in gigantic gas chambers accommodating 2,000 people, and no one could argue to the contrary.

THE LEUCHTER REPORT


In 1984 in Toronto, Canada, German-born publisher, Ernst Zundel, distributed his own edition of the pamphlet, “Did Six Million Really Die?”, and sent copies out to Canadian Members of Parliament; members of the clergy; journalists and broadcasters. A year later he was subsequently put on trial and sentenced to 15 months imprisonment followed by automatic deportation, after a Jewish complaint under an obscure law prohibiting the publication of “false news”.

This sentence was passed even though both the defense and the prosecution agreed that the bulk of “Did Six Million Really Die?” was correct and only small points were in dispute.

“The Leuchter Report” was actually commissioned by Ernst Zundel, to act in his defense, after his 1985 conviction was overturned by the Ontario Court of Appeal in 1987, and a retrial was ordered to commence in January, 1988.

In February 1988, the first forensic examination of the alleged execution gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek, was conducted by Fred Leuchter and subsequently published as “The Leuchter Report”.

Fred Leuchter, was an engineer who specializes in the design & fabrication of execution hardware used in prisons throughout the United States. One of his projects was the design of a new gas chamber at the Missouri State Penitentiary at Jefferson City.

In essence Fred Leuchter took samples from the walls of the alleged gas chambers and also from the walls of the de-lousing chambers so he could compare the claim that rather than Zyklon B being used to gas inmates of the various camps, it was actually used to de-louse the inmates clothing of lice in order to prevent outbreaks of typhus.

Leuchter’s results were overwhelming. He could find no trace of Zyklon B in the walls of the alleged gas chambers, yet it was overwhelmingly prevalent in the walls of the de-lousing chambers where the inmates’ clothing was cleaned of lice.

The Leuchter Report concludes, “After reviewing all the material and inspecting all of the sites at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek, your author finds the evidence overwhelming; there were no execution gas chambers at any of these locations. It is the best engineering opinion of this author that the alleged gas chambers at the inspected sites could not have been, or now, be utilized or seriously considered to function as execution gas chambers.”


Despite Fred Leuchter’s neutral position in questioning the official version of the “Holocaust” and his evidence based upon the exact science of forensic chemistry, Ernst Zundel was once again found guilty, albeit this time he was given a nine month sentence as opposed to the 15 month one he was given previously. He was granted bail after signing a “gag order”, promising not to write or speak about the “Holocaust”.

In 2003, Ernst Zundel was arrested at his quiet home in the mountain region of eastern Tennessee. U.S. authorities seized him on the pretext that he had violated immigration regulations, or had missed an interview date with US immigration authorities, even though he had entered the US legally, was married to an American citizen, had no criminal record, and was acting diligently, and in full accord with the law, to secure status as a permanent legal resident.

After being held for two weeks, he was deported to Canada. For two years he was held in solitary confinement in the Toronto West Detention Centre as a supposed threat to national security.

In 2005, Zundel was deported to Germany, just as Jewish groups had been demanding. Upon his arrival at Frankfurt airport, he was immediately arrested and taken to Mannheim prison to await trial for the “thought crime” of “denying the Holocaust.”

A few months later, the public prosecutor in Mannheim formally charged Zundel with inciting “hatred” by having written or distributed texts that “approve, deny or play down” genocidal actions carried out by Germany’s wartime regime, and which “denigrate the memory of the (Jewish) dead.” .

Zundel’s three-month trial concluded in 2007, when a court in Mannheim sentenced him to five years imprisonment for the crime of “popular incitement” under Germany’s notorious “Holocaust denial” statute. The court upheld efforts by German authorities to punish individuals for writings that are legal in the country (Canada) where they are published. Jewish groups quickly, and predictably, expressed approval of the verdict.

Zundel was released from prison in 2010. Banned from returning to either Canada or the United States, he went to his family home in Germany’s Black Forest region, where he resided until his death.

Meanwhile, Fred Leuchter was also “persecuted” & blacklisted by promoters of the Holohoax. In 1991, he was arrested & jailed in Germany for giving an anti-Holocaust lecture for Günther Deckert, a well-known political party leader. Leuchter was allowed out on bail. He returned to the U.S. and chose not to go back to Germany to stand trial. Nonetheless, he lost his livelihood as a result.

Quote:
The Allied Committee of Inquiry has to date proven that no poison gas was ever used to kill prisoners in the following concentration camps… Bergen-Belsen, Buchenwald, Dachau, Flossenburg, Gross-Rosen, Mauthausen, and satellite camps.. Natzweller, Neuengamme, Niederhagen, Ravensbruck, Sachsenhausen, Stutthoff, Theresienstadt. In all cases where gassings were alleged, it could be proven that torture was used to extract confessions, and witnesses have lied. Any former inmate who, during their debriefing continues to allege that Poison gas was used to murder people, in particular Jews, are to be reported to this office, and if they insist on lying further, they are to be charged with perjury.” -Major Miller, Commanding Officer Allied Military Police Vienna
Note: In a 1985 court case, Dr. William Lindsey testified under oath that the Auschwitz gassing story is physically impossible. Based on his careful examination of the alleged gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek, and on his years of experience, he declared, “I have come to the conclusion that no one was willfully or purposefully killed with Zyklon B in this manner. I consider it absolutely impossible.”

Note: When American & British forces overran Western & Central Germany in the spring of 1945, they were followed by troops charged with discovering and securing any evidence of German war crimes. Among them was Dr. Charles Larson, one of America’s leading forensic pathologists, who was assigned to the US Army’s Judge Advocate General’s Department. As part of a US War Crimes Investigation Team, Dr. Larson performed autopsies at Dachau and some twenty other German camps, examining on some days more than 100 corpses. After his grim work at Dachau, he was questioned for three days by US Army prosecutors. In a 1980 newspaper interview Dr. Larson confirmed that there “never was a case of poison gas uncovered.”

FINAL FORENSIC NAIL IN THE COFFIN – AUSCHWITZ STORY


Germar Rudolf was born on October 29, 1964, in Limburg, Germany. He studied chemistry at Bonn University, where he graduated in 1989 as a Diplom-Chemist. From 1990-1993, he prepared a PhD thesis at the Max Planck Institute for Solid State research in conjunction with the University of Stuttgart. Parallel to this and in his spare time, Rudolf re-examined Auschwitz, Birkenau and other installations and buildings, testing brick and mortar samples of delousing chambers & alleged “gas chambers” for traces of Zyklon B.

Following the pioneering work of Fred Leuchter, Germar put the final forensic nail into the coffin of the Auschwitz story with his 1993 expert report, The Rudolf Report, which proved the “Holocaust” to be a Holohoax. Even though this book on Auschwitz was scientific in nature and utterly apolitical, Rudolf’s home & office were raided three times; his computers & papers seized.

In 1994 & 1995 he was charged and tried in Germany for his expert report. As a scientist, he found the “gassing” claims to be scientifically untenable. Rudolf was found guilty and convicted to 14 month imprisonment. As a result, the University of Stuttgart denied him to pass his final PhD exam.

Rudolf tried to avoid serving this prison term by going into British exile with his young wife and two babies. There he started a small revisionist outlet for German language material, Castle Hill Publishers, and VHO.org, a multilingual website, which within a few years outgrew other revisionist websites by size & traffic. In early 1999, due to the permanent persecutorial pressure, his wife filed for divorce and returned to Germany with their two babies.

When Germany wanted to have Rudolf extradited from Britain in 1999, he fled to the United States, where he applied for political asylum. While his case wound its way through the U.S. legal system, Rudolf expanded his publishing activities into English language material, for instance by launching the ambitious “Holocaust Handbook Series” [linked at the top of this article].

In 2004 Rudolf married again, this time a U.S. citizen, and soon became the father of a young baby daughter. Immediately after this marriage was recognized as genuine by the U.S. Immigration Services in October 2005, and at a time when a hearing of his asylum case was just being scheduled by a U.S. Federal Court, the U.S. government had Rudolf arrested and deported to Germany.

Hence, his asylum hearing which took place in absentia a few months later was nothing but a farce. In Germany, Rudolf was duly arrested and put on trial again for his revisionist publishing activities abroad. Although Rudolf’s activities had been perfectly legal both in the United Kingdom and the United States, Germany nevertheless applied German censorship laws and sentenced Rudolf to another 30 months imprisonment.

On July 5, 2009, Rudolf was released from prison. After a legal battle against the U.S. government lasting almost two years, Rudolf finally succeeded in obtaining an immigrant visa for the U.S. He has been reunited with his wife & daughter since August, 2011.

Note: In 1995, one of France’s most influential & respected magazines, L’Express, acknowledged that “everything is false” about the Auschwitz “gas chamber” that for decades has been shown to tens of thousands of tourists yearly.

Note: On page 541 of (Jewish historian) Olga Wormser-Migot’s thesis on the system of National Socialists concentration camps, there is a passage on the “gas chambers”. There, the reader will find three additional surprises. According to Olga, the “problem” lies in attempting to determine whether the “gas chambers” at Ravensbrück (Germany) & Mauthausen (Austria) ever existed; she concludes that they didn’t.



GAS CHAMBERS WERE NOT CREMATORIES


Stephen F. Pinter, who served as a lawyer for the United States War Department in the occupation forces in Germany & Austria for six years after the war, made an astonishing statement in the widely read Catholic magazine, “Our Sunday Visitor”, on June 14, 1959.

Pinter admitted, “I was in Dachau for 17 months after the war, as a U.S. War Department Attorney, and can state that there was no gas chamber at Dachau. What was shown to visitors & sightseers there and erroneously described as a ‘gas chamber’ was a crematory. Nor was there a gas chamber in any of the other concentration camps in Germany. We were told that there was a gas chamber at Auschwitz, but since that was in the Russian zone of occupation, we were not permitted to investigate since the Russians would not allow it. From what I was able to determine during six postwar years in Germany & Austria, there were a number of Jews killed, but the figure of a million was certainly never reached. I interviewed thousands of Jews, former inmates of concentration camps in Germany and Austria and consider myself as well qualified as any man on this subject.”

Pinter tells a very different story from the customary propaganda. He is very astute on the question of the crematory being represented as a chamber. This is a frequent ploy because no such thing as a “gas chamber” has ever been shown to exist in these camps, hence the deliberately misleading term “gas oven”, aimed at confusing a gas chamber with a crematorium. The latter, usually single furnace and similar to the kind of thing employed today, were used quite simply for the cremation of those persons who had died from various natural causes within the camp, particularly infectious diseases.

This fact was conclusively proved by the German arch bishop Faulhaber of Munich. He informed the Americans that during the Allied air raid on Munich, in September 1944, 30,000 people were killed. The archbishop requested the authorities at the time to cremate the bodies, but was told that, unfortunately, this plan could not be carried out; the crematorium, having only one furnace, was not able to cope with the many bodies of the air raid victims.

Clearly, therefore, the crematorium could not have coped with the 238,000 Jewish bodies which were allegedly cremated there. In order to do so, the crematorium would have to be kept going for 326 years without stopping and 530 tons of ashes would have been recovered.

The figures of Dachau casualties are typical of the kind of exaggerations that have since been drastically revised. In 1946, a memorial plaque was unveiled at Dachau by Philip Auerbach, the Jewish State-Secretary in the Bavarian Government who was convicted for embezzling money, which he claimed as compensation for non-existent Jews. The plaque read, “This area is being retained as a shrine to the 238,000 individuals who were cremated here.”

Since then, the official casualty figures of Dachau have had to be steadily revised downwards, and now stand at only 20,600; the majority, from typhus & starvation only at the end of the war.

Note: Dachau was one the first concentration camp set up soon after the National Socialists came to power. These first camps were in reality large prisons to which inmates had been sentenced by the ordinary criminal courts to fixed terms of imprisonment. Membership in the Communist Party was a frequent criminal offense. Jews were largely involved in communist activities, and were imprisoned accordingly.

Battle for the West (Website): http://www.battleforthewest.com/

Battle for the West (BitChute): https://www.bitchute.com/channel/65cDI4QdHali/


http://www.renegadetribune.com/its-a...be-fooled-pt5/
 
Old March 7th, 2020 #6
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default

It’s a HOLOHOAX (Don’t Be Fooled) Pt6


March 7, 2020

THE TRUTH ABOUT CREMATIONS


When people talk about the millions of people being killed during the “Holocaust”, they seem to forget that the cremation process is the most important part of the equation. If the cremations didn’t keep up with the alleged deaths then testimonies of those “survivors” are thus invalid. They indeed proved to be “invalid”. It was a Holohoax!

Ivan Legace, a professional crematologist, testified, on April 5 & 6th, at the 1985 trial of Ernst Zundel, in Canada.

According to his testimony, which included detailing the cremation process, Legace explained…

-The Bow Valley Crematorium, his facility, was the hottest, and therefore, the fastest crematory in operation in North America, with the capacity to cremate one adult human body in a minimum time of an hour and a half, under optimum circumstances. Children took much less time to cremate simply because of their smaller size.

-The refractory tiles used on the floor of the ignition chamber tended to wear out very quickly, because of the wear and tear of the rollers, and because this was where the fuel ignited & burned. Lagacé, himself, had worn out floor titles after only 250 cremations by using metal rollers. Once the wear started it was extremely difficult to stop. To repair the unit in such circumstances the operator had to cease operation of the retort, allow the machine 48 hours of cooling down time with the door fully open, and preferably with a fan flowing through the machine. The bricks or tiling then had to be removed and new ones cemented.

The average life expectancy of floor refractory was 1,500 cremations. The bricks of the retort’s walls & ceilings were rated for 3,000 cremations, while the bricks of the after-burn chamber were rated for roughly 2,000 cremations.

-The time to cremate a human being, the cremation cycle, took an average of two hours. After the first cremation of the day was completed, the operator must let the retort cool-down for a minimum of one hour before beginning the second case. After the second cremation, a cool-down period of at least two hours was required.

Even with cool-down times, Lagacé testified that cremations could not be done “24 hours a day, round the clock, day after day… The refractory will not tolerate it.”


-Factory recommendation for normal operation was a maximum of three cases per day in a normal eight hour work day. No more than 50-60 cases should be processed in any month so that the refractory life was prolonged. That was an average of 2 cases a day.

There was no way to speed up this process, Lagacé testified, without effecting the refractory brick and endangering the life of the operator. If no cool-down period was allowed between cremations, the temperature would go out of control and probably exceed the 2,200 degrees Fahrenheit rated for the bricks. This would cause excessive spalling, or flaking, of the bricks. Secondly, the operator could not safely open a retort having an internal temperature of 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit.

Lagacé emphasized the real dangers involved if the cool-down periods were not followed. If an operator attempted to introduce a body into the retort when temperatures were still excessive, a “flash ignition” could occur whereby the body would ignite before it was fully introduced into the retort. In such a case, the operator would be engulfed in flames from the burning body and would be unable to close the door to the retort. To put it simply, he said, “You can basically walk away and watch your building burn down.”

-Lagacé testified that the plans for the Birkenau (Auschwitz-Birkenau) crematory indicated that it had been built to almost the exact specifications of the Bow Valley Crematorium. In Lagacé’s opinion, the rate of burn of the Birkenau unit would be as efficient but not more than his own unit in Calgary.

The only technology difference that Lagacé could see between his own crematory and those of Birkenau was the burner section. Lagacé’s crematory used a natural gas burner while Birkenau used a stoking system with coal or something of a similar nature. The technology of Lagacé’s crematory allowed him to shut the gas off for cooling. Coal was very cumbersome in that regard, and this would affect the time limit, since the operator could not go through a cooling cycle as quickly.

-Lagacé was shown a photograph of one of the Birkenau crematories taken during the war and asked if the units looked familiar to his own crematory. Lagacé agreed that they were. He indicated, however, that the Birkenau retorts had been built in units of three with common walls between them. This would have eliminated the need for extra bricks, and been much easier & quicker to construct. However, he noted, “should one of these need to be maintained or need any repairs, it would necessitate the shutdown of the other two (retorts) attached to it, because you can’t have temperatures of 2,000 degrees radiating into an area where you’re working on another retort.”Lagacé believed that this design would never be used in a modern crematory simply because, as a business, it could not afford to have a shutdown of three units if one broke down.

-Lagacé was asked to comment on the (Jewish) claims made by Raul Hilberg in “The Destruction of the European Jews”, with respect to the capacities of the 46 retorts in the four crematories at Birkenau. Hilberg claimed that the theoretical daily capacity of the four Birkenau crematoria was somewhat over 4,400, but, with breakdowns & slowdowns, the practical limit was almost always lower.

Lagacé stated that this claim was “preposterous” and “beyond the realm of reality.” To claim that 46 retorts could cremate over 4,400 bodies in a day was “ludicrous.” Based on his own experience, Lagacé testified that it would only have been possible to cremate a maximum of 184 bodies a day at Birkenau.

-Lagacé was asked to comment on the (Jewish) claims by Gerald Reitlinger & Olga Lengyel.

Reitlinger, who written one of the first Jewish-approved comprehensive histories of the “Holocaust” in 1953, wrote that 6,000 people were cremated a day. This would mean a total, by October 1944, of over 5 million cremations.

Even more preposterous, Lengyel in her book, “Five Chimneys”, claiming to be a former Jewish inmate of Auschwitz, asserted that the camp cremated no less than “720 per hour, or 17,280 corpses per twenty-four hour shift.” Lengyel also alleges that, in addition, 8,000 people were burned every day in the “death-pits”, and that therefore, “In round numbers, about 24,000 corpses were handled every day.” This, of course, would mean a yearly rate of over 8.5 million. Thus between March 1942 and October 1944 Auschwitz would finally have disposed of over 21 million people, six million more than the entire world Jewish population.

Lagacé testified that from his own experience in cremating approximately 1,000 bodies, the figures cited by Reitlinger & Lengyel were not realistic. He testified, “This doesn’t even begin to enter reality at all. It’s just physically unrealistic.”

Lagacé said that even with present (1985) disaster plans, which provide for massive mobilization and the handling of large numbers of human remains, it would be “unimaginable” to cremate such numbers.


-Lagacé referred to the 1985 issue of a statistical sheet compiled yearly by the Cremation Association of North America, showing the numbers of retorts located on the continent and the number of cremations done annually.

The statistics indicated that in 1985, there were a total of 338,370 bodies cremated in 931 crematories in North America. In Canada alone, a total of 49,216 cremations were performed in 94 crematories.

-Lagacé testified that he had observed the results of burning people in the open in a case involving a homicide where the murderer had attempted to burn the remains of his victim with gasoline in an open area in the woods of northern Ontario. He had been unable to do so. Human bodies did not burn completely in open spaces.

In 90 percent of the cases, it would be the epidermis, or the skin, that would be charred; maybe perhaps the limbs would be burnt, but the torso was very difficult to cremate. It took high temperatures over a prolonged period of time in order to fully cremate a human being. Moreover, an open air burning would require far more fuel. In a retort there was a controlled optimum atmosphere. In open air, heat constantly escaped so that it was very difficult to concentrate all the heat into one area.

-Regarding the decomposition of corpses and handling of typhus-infected corpses, Lagacé described the procedures enforced by the Alberta government in the case of corpses infected with typhus.

If the body was buried, it had to be encased in a hermetically sealed container which would last over a prolonged period of time; and only when the soil conditions allowed this, in order to avoid contamination of the water-table or underground streams.

Note: By the early summer of 1944, the ground water level at the Auschwitz-Birkenau camp, which had fallen at the beginning of the year, had risen again. This is evident in a telegram from SS-Obersturmfuhrer, Werner Jothann, to Kammler, dated June 2, 1944. Jothann refused approval, on hygienic grounds, for the use of 14 barracks located in Building Segment III of Birkenau Camp. He said, “The barracks are only partly covered, the terrain is marshy, and not leveled in any way. There is a danger of pollution of the ground water and the creation of other hotbeds of epidemics.”

RED CROSS REPORT EXPOSES THE HOLOCAUST


Several thousand camp inmates did die in the chaotic final months of the war, due to disease & malnourishment.

Sealed and guarded since the end of WWII at Arolsen, Germany, the official International Red Cross (IRC) records reveal the actual Concentration Camps total death toll was 271,301, which includes the Jews.

The International Red Cross published their analysis in a three volume “Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War” published in Geneva, Switzerland, in 1948. This analysis expanded findings of two previous publications, “Sur L’activite’ du CICR en faveur des civils detencus dans les camps de concentration en Allemagne 1939-1945” (Geneva, 1946) & “Inter Arma Caritas: The Work of the ICRF during the Second World War” (Geneva, 1947).

In 1949 the International Red Cross interviewed prisoners in the Axis German camps. They were not allowed to interview prisoners in the Allied Russian camps (gulags) which were extremely harsh & deadly.

The German camps held both political prisoners and those convicted of crimes. The Germans allowed the Red Cross to distribute food, medicine and clothing to the prisoners.

Regarding the Theresienstadt camp, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) said, “”There were about 40,000 Jews deported from various countries, was a relatively privileged ghetto… The Committee’s delegates were able to visit the camp at Theresienstadt (Terezin) which was used exclusively for Jews and was governed by special conditions… From information gathered by the Committee, this camp had been started as an experiment by certain leaders of the Reich… These men wished to give the Jews the means of setting up a communal life in a town under their own administration and possessing almost complete autonomy.”

The ICRC also had praise for the regime of Ion Antonescu, of Fascist Rumania, where the Committee was able to extend special relief to 183,000 Rumanian Jews until the time of the Soviet occupation.

The aid then ceased and the Red Cross complained bitterly that it never succeeded “in sending anything whatsoever to Russia”. The same situation applied to many of the German camps after their “liberation” by the Russians.

The ICRC received a voluminous flow of mail from Auschwitz until the period of the Soviet occupation, when many of the internees were evacuated westward. But the efforts of the Red Cross to send relief to internees remaining at Auschwitz under Soviet control were futile.

However, food parcels continued to be sent to former Auschwitz inmates transferred west to such Axis camps as Buchenwald & Oranienburg.

One of the most important aspects of the Report of the ICRC is that it clarifies the true cause of those deaths that undoubtedly occurred in the camps towards the end of the war. The ICRC reported, “In the chaotic condition of Germany after the invasion during the final months of the war, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims.”

The International Red Cross was quite explicit in stating that food supplies ceased, due to the Allied bombing of German transportation, and in the interests of interned Jews they had protested on March 15th, 1944 against “the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies.”

In dealing with this comprehensive, three-volume Report, it is important to stress that the delegates of the International Red Cross found no evidence whatsoever of “gas chambers”.


The original 1946 edition did not even talk of “extermination” or “death camps”, but after the emotional impact of the Nuremberg trials the Red Cross felt compelled (pressured) to introduce into the expanded 1948 Report several, very vague cursory references to “death camps” & “extermination camps”. However, no means (proof) of “extermination” is indicated. It was a Holohoax!

In all its 1,600 pages the three-volume Report does not even mention such a thing as a “gas chamber”. It acknowledges that Jews, like many other wartime nationalities, suffered rigors & privations, but its complete silence on the subject of “gassings” is ample refutation of the “Holocaust” legend.

Volume III of the Report of the ICRC, Chapter 3, deals with the “aid given to the Jewish section of the free population” and this chapter makes it quite plain that by no means all of the European Jews were placed in internment camps but remained, subject to certain restrictions, as part of the free civilian population.

Not only did large numbers of the three million or so European Jews in German-controlled territory avoid internment altogether, but the emigration of Jews continued throughout the war, generally by way of Hungary, Rumania and Turkey. Ironically, post-war Jewish emigration from German-occupied territories was also facilitated by the Reich, as in the case of the Polish Jews who had escaped to France before its occupation.

The ICRC reports, “The Jews from Poland who, whilst in France, had obtained entrance permits to the United States were held to be American citizens by the German occupying authorities, who further agreed to recognize the validity of about three thousand passports issued to Jews by the consulates of South American countries.”

As future U.S. citizens, these Jews were held at the Vittel camp in southern France for American aliens. The emigration of European Jews from Hungary in particular proceeded during the war unhindered by the German authorities. “Until March 1944,” says the Red Cross Report, “Jews who had the privilege of visas for Palestine were free to leave Hungary.” Even after the replacement of the Horthy Government in 1944, following its attempted armistice with the Soviet Union, with a government more dependent on German authority, the emigration of Jews continued.

The Committee secured the pledges of both Britain and the United States “to give support by every means to the emigration of Jews from Hungary”. The U.S. Government gave the ICRC a message stating that the Government of the United States “now specifically repeats its assurance that arrangements will be made by it for the care of all Jews who in the present circumstances are allowed to leave.”

The ICRC report demonstrates conclusively that throughout the war the camps were well administered.

The working inmates received a daily ration, even throughout 1943 and 1944, of not less than 2,750 calories, which was more than double the average civilian ration in occupied Germany in the years after 1945.

The camp inmates were under regular medical care and those who became seriously ill were transferred to hospital. All inmates, unlike those in Soviet camps, could receive parcels of food, clothing and pharmaceutical supplies from the Special Relief Division of the Red Cross.


HUMAN CONDITIONS AT THE CAMPS

SS Judge, Dr. Konrad Morgen, of the Reich Criminal Police Office, testified at Nuremberg that he discussed confidentially with hundreds of inmates the prevailing conditions in the camps. He found few that were under-nourished except in the hospitals, and noted that the pace & achievement in compulsory labor by inmates was far lower than among German civilian workers.

The anti-National Socialist, Communist leader, Ernst Ruff, testified in his Nuremberg affidavit of April 18th, 1947, that the treatment of prisoners on the work details and in the camp of Dachau remained humane.

The Polish underground leader, Jan Piechowiak, who was at Dachau from May 22, 1940 until April 29, 1945, also testified that prisoners there received good treatment, and that the SS personnel at the camp were “well disciplined”.

Berta Schirotschin, who worked in the food service at Dachau throughout the war, testified that the working inmates, until the beginning of 1945 and despite increasing privation in Germany, received their customary second breakfast at 10 AM, every morning.

In general, hundreds of affidavits from Nuremberg testify to the humane conditions prevailing in concentration camps; but emphasis was invariably laid on those which reflected badly on the German administration and could be used for propaganda purposes.

A study of the documents also reveals that Jewish witnesses who resented their deportation & internment in prison camps tended to greatly exaggerate the rigors of their condition, whereas other nationals interned for political reasons, such as those cited above, generally presented a more balanced picture. In many cases, prisoners, such as Charlotte Bormann, whose experiences did not accord with the picture presented at Nuremberg, were not permitted to testify.

Note: The Germans did “not” use fluoride in the drinking water at concentration camps, or other places during World War 2. This is just one of the many myths floating around the Internet and repeated by half-truthers, like the Alex Jones show of InfoWars. There is no proof! Just another Holohoax!

Note: The stories of Dr. Mengele, named “Angel of Death”, and his murderous medical experiments relied primarily on the testimony & memoirs of one man & Jewish prisoner, Miklos Nyiszli. There was actual no documentation or proof that Dr. Mengele or anyone in his charge murdered anyone.


CRIMINAL JUSTICE AT THE CAMPS


The German “Office of the Public Prosecutor” conducted thorough investigations into each case of criminal arrest and those found innocent were released; those found guilty, as well as those deportees convicted of major crimes within the camps, were sentenced by military courts & executed.

In the Federal Archives of Koblenz there is a directive of January, 1943, from Heinrich Himmler, regarding such executions, stressing that “no brutality is to be allowed.”

Occasionally there was brutality, but such cases were immediately scrutinized by SS Judge, Dr. Konrad Morgen, of the Reich Criminal Police Office, whose job was to investigate irregularities at the various camps. Morgen himself prosecuted commander Koch of Buchenwald in 1943 for excesses at his camp, a trial to which the German public was invited.

It is significant that Oswald Pohl, the administrator of the concentration camp system who was dealt with so harshly at Nuremberg, was in favor of the death penalty for Koch. In fact, the SS court did sentence Koch to death but he was given the option of serving on the Russian front. Before he could do this, however, Prince Waldeck, the leader of the SS in the district, carried out his execution.

This case is ample proof of the seriousness with which the SS regarded unnecessary brutality.

Several SS court actions of this kind were conducted in the camps during the war to prevent excesses and more than 800 cases were investigated before 1945.

http://www.renegadetribune.com/its-a...be-fooled-pt6/
 
Old March 7th, 2020 #7
Erik T. White
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: The Deep South of the USSA
Posts: 4,813
Default

From above:

Quote:
ven more preposterous, Lengyel in her book, “Five Chimneys”, claiming to be a former Jewish inmate of Auschwitz, asserted that the camp cremated no less than “720 per hour, or 17,280 corpses per twenty-four hour shift.” Lengyel also alleges that, in addition, 8,000 people were burned every day in the “death-pits”, and that therefore, “In round numbers, about 24,000 corpses were handled every day.” This, of course, would mean a yearly rate of over 8.5 million. Thus between March 1942 and October 1944 Auschwitz would finally have disposed of over 21 million people, six million more than the entire world Jewish population.
There's that goddamn "magic number" of SIX MILLION AGAIN!!!

I think I'll design a cap that reads "MIG." Make Israel Glow. And I mean in the dark!!!

__________________
Whites are afraid to speak out against their enemies, let alone act out. This must change ~ Alex Linder
Sweat saves blood, blood saves lives, but brains saves both. ~ Erwin Rommel
 
Old March 10th, 2020 #8
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default

It’s a HOLOHOAX (Don’t Be Fooled) Pt7


March 10, 2020

UNAVOIDABLE CHAOS


The orderly situation prevailing in the German concentration camps slowly broke down in the last fearful months of 1945. The Red Cross Report of 1948 explains that the saturation bombing by the Allies paralyzed the transport & communications system of the Reich.

No food reached the concentration camps and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims, both in prison camps “and” among the civilian population of Germany.


This terrible situation was compounded in the camps both by great overcrowding and the consequent outbreak of typhus epidemics. Overcrowding occurred as a result of prisoners from the eastern camps such as Auschwitz being evacuated westward before the Russian advance; columns of exhausted people arrived at several German camps such as Belsen & Buchenwald, which had themselves reached a state of great hardship.

Belsen camp near Bremen was in an especially chaotic condition in these months and Himmler’s physician, Felix Kersten, an anti-National Socialist, explains that it is unfortunate reputation as a “Death Camp” was due solely to the ferocity of the typhus epidemic which broke out there in March, 1945.

Undoubtedly, these fearful conditions & typhus epidemic cost several thousand lives, and it is these conditions that are portrayed in the “Holocaust” photographs of emaciated human beings and heaps of corpses, which the propagandists delight in showing, claiming that they were victims of “extermination”.

A surprisingly honest appraisal of the situation at Belsen in 1945 appeared in Purnell’s History of the Second World War, by Dr. Russell Barton, who spent one month at the camp as a British medical student after the war. His account vividly illustrates the true causes of the mortality that occurred in such camps towards the war’s end, and how such extreme conditions came to prevail there.

Dr. Barton explained that Brigadier Glyn Hughes, the British Medical Officer who took command of Belsen in 1945, did not think there had been any atrocities in the camp despite discipline & hard work. Dr. Barton said that most people attributed the conditions of the inmates to deliberate intention on the part of the Germans, and inmates were eager to cite examples of brutality & neglect. Per his experience, visiting journalists from different countries interpreted the situation “according to the needs of propaganda at home.”

However, Dr. Barton made it clear that the conditions of starvation & disease were unavoidable due to the circumstances and that they occurred only during the months of 1945. He said, “From discussions with prisoners it seemed that conditions in the camp were not too bad until late 1944. The huts were set among pine trees and each was provided with lavatories, wash basins, showers and stoves for heating.

The cause of food shortage is also explained by Dr. Barton, “German medical officers told me that it had been increasingly difficult to transport food to the camp for some months. Anything that moved on the autobahns was likely to be bombed… I was surprised to find records, going back for two or three years, of large quantities of food cooked daily for distribution. At that time I became convinced, contrary to popular opinion, that there had never been a policy of deliberate starvation. This was confirmed by the large numbers of well-fed inmates. Why then were so many people suffering from malnutrition? The major reasons for the state of Belsen were disease, gross overcrowding by central authority, lack of law & order within the huts and inadequate supplies of food, water and drugs.”

Dr. Barton made the following conclusion, “In trying to assess the causes of the conditions found in Belsen one must be alerted to the tremendous visual display, ripe for purposes of propaganda, that masses of starved corpses presented… To discuss such conditions naively, in terms of ‘goodness’ & ‘badness’, is to ignore the constituent factors.”

FAKE ATROCITY PROPAGANDA


Not only were situations such as those at Belsen unscrupulously exploited for propaganda purposes, but this propaganda has also made use of entirely fake atrocity photographs & films. The extreme conditions at Belsen applied to very few camps indeed; the great majority escaped the worst difficulties and their inmates survived in good health.

As a result, outright forgeries were used to exaggerate conditions of horror.

A startling case of such forgery, for example, was revealed in the British Catholic Herald of October 29th, 1948. It reported that in Cassel, where every adult German was compelled, during Allied “denazification efforts, to see a film representing the “horrors” of Buchenwald, a doctor from Goettingen saw himself on the screen looking after the victims. But he had never been to Buchenwald. After an interval of bewilderment, he realized that what he had seen was part of a film taken after the terrible air raid on Dresden by the Allies on February 13th, 1945, where the doctor had been working. After the air raid on Dresden, which killed a record 135,000 people, mostly refugee women & children, the bodies of the victims were piled & burned in a heap of 400 and 500 for several weeks. These were the horrific scenes, purporting to be from Buchenwald, which the doctor had recognized.

The forgery of war-time atrocity photographs is not new. The book, “Falsehood in Wartime”, by Arthur Ponsonby MP, exposes the faked photographs of German atrocities in the First World War. Ponsonby cites such fabrications as “The Corpse Factory” and “The Belgian Baby without Hands,” which are strikingly reminiscent of the propaganda relating to “Nazi atrocities”.

Holocaust Revisionist, F.J.P. Veale, explains in his book that the bogus “jar of human soap”, solemnly introduced by the Soviet prosecution at Nuremberg, was a deliberate sneer (mocking) at the famous British “Corpse Factory” myth, in which the ghoulish Germans were supposed to have obtained various commodities from processing corpses. The British Government apologized for this accusation after 1918.

The Corpse Factory Myth received new life after 1945 in the tale of “lamp shades of human skin”, which was certainly as fraudulent as Soviet claims of “human soap.” Evidence of lamp shades, at the Buchenwald Trial, later appeared to be dubious, typical war-time atrocity propaganda, just like fake “Holocaust” photos.

Note: On February 29th, 1944, a letter to the BBC & higher members of the British clergy, was delivered from the British Ministry of Information, from H. Hewet, Assistant Secretary. It laid out, in no uncertain terms, essentially, that everyone should be well aware of the crimes committed by the Bolsheviks over the last 24 years in Russia & Eastern Europe. It was inevitable they will do the same in Central Europe. The British Ministry of Information will cover up their crimes by lying about the Germans. Since the public is not as stupid as it was, their lies will be better, and they must spread these lies, convincingly.

One part of the letter read, “Experience has shown that the best distraction is atrocity propaganda directed against the enemy. Unfortunately the public is no longer so susceptible as in the days of the ‘Corpse Factory’, and the ‘Mutilated Belgian Babies’, and the ‘Crucified Canadians’.”


BRITAIN’S RUMOR FACTORY


For more than thirty years, historians have been aware of once-secret memoranda by senior British intelligence official Victor Cavendish-Bentinck in which he casts doubt on the alleged use of homicidal gas chambers by National Socialist Germany. Writing to Whitehall colleagues at the end of 1 August 1943, Cavendish-Bentinck used dismissive language which today in most European countries would undoubtedly see him prosecuted for “Holocaust denial”.

Almost 20 years after the David Irving vs. Deborah Lipstadt trial, it is now possible to access a broader range of British documents, including intelligence material, that shed more light on the role of British propaganda & intelligence in relation to the initial allegations of homicidal gassing by National Socialists.

The conclusions can be briefly summarized…

-Britain’s Political Warfare Executive and its predecessor first deployed stories of homicidal gassing as part of propaganda efforts in two areas unconnected to treatment of Jews. Their objective was to spread dissension & demoralization among German soldiers & civilians, and among Germany’s allies.

-Partly because they knew of these earlier propagandist initiatives, Victor 2 Cavendish-Bentinck and his British intelligence colleague Roger Allen disbelieved later stories that homicidal gas chambers had been used to murder Poles and Jews. They succeeded in having these allegations removed from the draft of a joint Anglo-American Declaration on German Crimes in Poland, published on 30th August 1943.

Holocaust historians of the Holohoax now suggest that the homicidal gassing of Jews began in February & March 1942, and maintain that the first homicidal gassings of Soviet & Polish prisoners in Auschwitz took place in August & September 1941. Yet, Britain’s Special Operations Executive (SOE) were putting out a rumor about the 43 gassing of “incurables”, an euthanasia reference, in December 1940, and an extension of this rumor encompassed the gassing of severely wounded soldiers was disseminated by the summer of 1941, before the very first alleged gassings of prisoners at Auschwitz.

Britain’s Special Operations Executive & Political Warfare Executive (PWE) records fatally undermine one of Professor Richard Evans’ arguments against David Irving in his trial against Deborah Lipstadt. Evans wrote: “There was no evidence here or anywhere else, indeed, that the British Political Warfare Executive had invented the story of the gas chambers.” In fact the SOE & PWE certainly did invent stories about homicidal gassings, the inventions were circulated long before any such gassings are now alleged to have taken place.

Note: In 1977, on American television, and then again on the David Frost British television program in June 1977, when “Hitler’s War” was first published, David Irving offered $1000 U.S. dollars to any person finding a wartime document showing explicitly that Adolf Hitler knew about the mass liquidation of Western Europe’s Jews. Over time, this reward grew to $10,000, then $15,000 U.S. dollars. No one was able to find such a wartime document as of yet; further proof of the Holohoax.

THE GERMANS WERE COMPULSIVE BOOKKEEPERS


The Document Center in Bad Arolsen, holds the original document that list all the deaths, and all of the causes, in the German concentration camps from 1933 to 1945. They are written down in official, original ledgers with the correct stamping, signatures, forms, etc. “All causes” means all causes of deaths; accidents, illnesses, diseases, epidemics, old age, etc., and also execution, murder amongst the inmates and enemy action.That number amounts to, about, 270,000, which is a number that is also collaborated by the figures the International Red Cross documented.

These amounts should represent the deaths from the typhus epidemic, killing 4113 in Auschwitz in 1942, but does probably not contain the deaths from the British bombing of Nordhausen in April of 1945, or those in Bergen-Belsen in the last weeks of the war due to lack of everything from water & food to medications to stem the rising typhus epidemic.

The number of 270,000 is not extraordinary for a situation as chaotic as Word War 2 and the hundreds of millions of people involved in the warring parties.

What exists as documentation shows that the alleged “Holocaust” is a Holohoax. Thank God the Germans were such compulsive bookkeepers that they had written everything down.

IT’S A HOLOHOAX!


Very Important Note: In violation of commonly accepted rules of warfare, during Germany’s pre-emptive invasion of Russia, many Soviet partisans neither wore uniforms, nor recognized international law. To grow the ranks of the Red partisans, and prevent the Germans from winning over the civilian population, Soviet commandos dressed up in German uniforms and carried out “false-flag” atrocities “against their own people”, inciting hatred against the Germans.

Communist & Jewish partisans, aided by the OSS (forerunner to CIA), also formed in other nations, using the same false-flag tactics, and menacing the safety of German troops unable to tell enemy from civilian.

Massive Jewish support for, and participation in, non-uniformed Partisan “guerilla warfare” groups, “including women & children”, is one of the main reasons for Hitler’s decision to intern Europe’s Jews in work camps as a wartime security precaution.

An additional reason for Hitler’s intern decision is the extremity of anti-German Jewish propaganda that was coming out of the Jewish-controlled press, and International Jewry’s declaration of war against the Germans. Not to mention, the Jews instigating of World War 1 & 2 and supporting Bolshevik revolution in Germany. This scared the Germans!

A 104-page booklet, ‘’Germany Must Perish!’, was published in 1941 by an American Zionist businessman named, Theodore Kaufman. He called for the complete extermination of the German people through forced sterilization, total dismemberment and reapportionment of German territory.

Incredibly, at a time when America is supposedly “neutral”, the hateful book was actually reviewed & praised by The New York Times, Time Magazine and the Washington Post.

Dozens of other propaganda books, similar to Kaufman’s were also published by Jewish authors at the time with the same intent of demonizing Germans, like Ben Hecht’s “A Guide for the Bedeviled” which read, “A cancer flourishes in the body of the world and in its mind & soul… the cancerous thing is Germany, Germanism and Germans.”

The grotesque caricature of Germans developed by these books was the model that Hollywood & magazine scriptwriters used in concocting their poisonous anti-German narratives. A whole mythology of German wickedness was created. Gradually the threads from the 1930s were drawn together during the 1940s and woven into a fabric of anti-German hatred which was used to stifle the thinking of a people of the West. It was only through this Jewish scripting that the average American was permitted to view the world & Germans during the 1940s and onwards.


Doubtless large numbers of Jewish persons did die in the course of the Second World War, but this must be seen in the context of a war that cost many millions of innocent victims on all sides.

The question most pertinent to the “extermination” legend is, of course, how many of the 3 million European Jews under German control survived after 1945? The Jewish Joint Distribution Committee estimated the number of survivors in Europe to be only one and a half million, but such a figure is now totally unacceptable. This is proved by the growing number of Jews claiming compensation from the West German Government for having allegedly suffered between 1939 and 1945.

By 1965, the number of these claimants registered with the West German Government had tripled in ten years and reached 3,375,000. Nothing could more devastating proof of the brazen fantasy of the Six Million. Most of these claimants are Jews, so there be no doubt that the majority of the 3 million Jewish people who experienced the German occupation of Europe remained, in fact, very much alive.


NO MENTION OF THE HOLOCAUST…OOPS!


In the last of Winston Churchill’s 6-volume set, “The Second World War”, written from 1948 to 1952, entitled “Triumph and Tragedy”, there is absolutely no reference to mass murders of Jews or anyone else in German concentration camps, and Jews are only discussed as an organized fighting force and the fact they were mistreated in Hungary.

Churchill described what occurred from memory and access to records & correspondence, separating the war-time facts from propaganda lies. While writing, he was not influenced by media-generated Holocaust stories, which didn’t start being pumped out until 1958. Churchill obviously believed the Jewish experience was a small portion of the entire Allied WW2 effort, and they didn’t deserve more space in his books. However if he had known mass-murders were occurring the any German-run camps one would think this would have been included in even a few words, but there are none.


Churchill made are a few references to Jews, but most are simple passing comments. Only one entry, out of six volumes, addresses Jewish persecution. In Volume 1, page 58, we find one single phrase; “brutalities towards the Jews were rampant.”

It’s worth remembering that Churchill’s literary agent was a Hungarian Jew.

There is no mention of the Holocaust in Dwight D. Eisenhower’s 550-page book, “Crusade in Europe” (1948). Reviewing the index, one finds no listing for either “Auschwitz”, “Holocaust” or “gas chambers”. On a single entry on the Jews, there is no mention of exterminations, mass murder, gassings, crematoria, etc.

The single entry on Jews refers to the following paragraph…

“Of all these displaced persons, the Jews were in the most deplorable condition. For years they had been beaten, starved, and tortured. Even food, clothes, and decent treatment could not immediately enable them to shake off their hopelessness & apathy. They huddled together; they seemingly derived a feeling of safety out of crowding together in a single room, and there passively awaited whatever might befall. To secure for them adequate shelter, to establish a system of food distribution & medical service, to say nothing of providing decent sanitary facilities, heat, and light was a most difficult task. They were, in many instances, no longer capable of helping themselves; everything had to be done for them.”

Charles de Gaulle’s work, “The Complete War Memoirs” (1954/1964), consists of three volumes and a total of more than 2,000 pages. In the index there is no reference whatsoever to “Auschwitz”, “Holocaust” or “gas chambers”; nor this time even to Jews. This book being the latest, written of the three works (French original in 1954), De Gaulle obviously had plenty of time to reflect on the “Holocaust” and the mass murders of Jews; evidently it merited no discussion at all; obviously, because it never occurred. It was a Holohoax!

The 1956 Encyclopedia Britannica had only one reference to “Nazi” atrocities against the Jews. The extensive Second World War article made no mention of Nazi pogroms against the Jews. The edition also has no articles devoted to the “Holocaust”.


In an article titled “Jews”, there was a short section on the Jews during the war. This article, written by Jacob Marcus, perhaps the preeminent Jewish historian in the world at that time, cited many Jewish writers and authorities as sources, including Encyclopedia Judaica, Judishe Lexicon, the Jewish Encyclopedia, and the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia.

A pro-Jewish perspective dominated the article, and Marcus described Jewish conditions under the Nazis with these words (found in the 1947, 1952 and 1956 editions)…

“In order to effect a solution of the Jewish problem in line with their theories, the Nazis carried out a series of expulsions & deportations of Jews, mostly of original east European stock, from nearly all European states.”

“Men frequently separated from their wives, and others from children, were sent by the thousands to Poland & western Russia. There, they were put into concentration camps, or huge reservations, or sent into the swamps, or out on the roads, into labour gangs. Large numbers perished under the inhuman conditions (typhus) which they labored. While every other large Jewish center was being embroiled in war, American Jewry was gradually assuming a position of leadership in world Jewry.”

The “Holocaust” & “gas chambers” are clearly absent in the personal dossier Stalin ordered on Hitler, published as “The Hitler Book: The Secret Dossier Prepared for Stalin from the Interrogations of Hitler’s Personal Aides”, by Henrik Eberle, Matthias Uhl, and Giles MacDonogh; written in English in 2005. Ooops!

It wasn’t until the 1960s that scholars & writers began using the term “Holocaust”, and it took the 1978 TV film, “Holocaust”, starring Meryl Streep, to push it into widespread use.

The New York Times, in 1936, however, went off the script and let the fake “Holocaust” cat out of the bag a full 5 years before the Jews were even interned. They published a story about a petition from Chicago & New York Zionists that warned about the “intolerable sufferings” of the millions of Jews in the European “Holocaust”. This was fake news at its best!

http://www.renegadetribune.com/its-a...be-fooled-pt7/
 
Old March 15th, 2020 #9
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default

It’s a HOLOHOAX (Don’t Be Fooled) Pt8


March 14, 2020

THE “HOLOCAUST” INDUSTRY


When a Jew, Norman Finkelstein, wrote “The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering”, in 2000, he argued that Holocaust “hoaxers” & “hucksters”, namely Jewish organizations, have exploited what happened in National Socialist Germany in order to get millions of dollars from Swiss banks. Finkelstein righty called those Jewish leaders a “repellent gang of plutocrats, hoodlums, and hucksters.”

Definition: “Holo-cost” (caust) means millions of shekels for the Holohoax industry.

The book was quickly denounced as a work of an anti-Semite, despite the fact that Finkelstein lost his grandparents in Germany, during World War 2. Finkelstein was teaching at Hunter College at the time, and lost his job right after the publication of the book.

Many skeptics questioned his motives, yet no one has put forward a reasonable counterargument to Finkelstein’s thesis.

Ten years later, some Jewish organizations continued to prove that Finkelstein was right. The Nadav Haetzni law firm, which provides legal advice to the state-owned Company for Restitution of Holocaust Victims Assets, was one of those organizations. The Jewish newspaper, Haaretz, reported that this firm “has earned millions of shekels in fees over the last three years.”

That’s not all, the firm “took in NIS 1.2 million in fees in 2008 and over NIS 1 million in 2009; the figure for 2007 was similar. That sum is on top of the hundreds of thousands of shekels the company paid to other law firms during those years.”

The same year, The Jewish Week newspaper reported, “The Claims Conference fired three employees last week who allegedly approved more than 100 fraudulent Holocaust-era claims, filed primarily by Russians now living in Brooklyn, which bilked the German government out of more than $350,000.

Per the Jerusalem Post, in 2010, “The FBI was investigating fraudulent misappropriation of at least $7 million, possibly substantially more, over the past decade from the Article 2 Fund (administered by the Claims Conference) created in 1995 by the German government to provide quarterly pensions to eligible Holocaust survivors.”

The Claims Conference, in the end, was responsible for a massive fraud, and Jewish hoaxers were amassing a whopping $57 million from it. One German observer who was at the trial simply was shocked to see how the organization was taking “money collected as taxes from German citizens” and how the money “went to individuals who were not Holocaust survivors.”

The Claims Conference has been responsible for pressing the German government over compensation claims made by alleged victims of the Holocaust.

This Claims Conference scandal is very bizarre for obvious reasons, even if the “Holocaust” actually happened.

What kind of compensation did the Russian Christian peasants receive after the Bolshevik regime wiped out more than twenty to sixty million people? No compensation was allocated to their children, let alone their generational children. Why was that?

What kind of compensation did the German civilians receive right after World War 2, when the brutal Soviet Red Army raped & tortured millions of men, women and children?

What kind of compensation did the Germans receive after the bombing of Dresden, and many other cities?

The Turkish government, which was run by Jewish revolutionaries & Freemasons, known as the Donmeh, from 1915 until 1923, liquidated about 1.5 million Armenian Christians. What kind of compensation did those Christians receive?

What kind of compensation did Iraqi families receive when the (Jewish) neo-conservative movement largely destroyed the country?


Demands for “Holocaust” compensation & sympathy are quite ridiculous, along with get-rich schemes…

-In 2009, Israel’s Finance Minister, Yuval Steinitz demanded between 450 million to 1 billion euros in reparations from Germany on behalf of Jews forced into slave labor during the Holocaust.

-In 2010, a Jewish watchmaker, Jack Barouh, was guilty of tax evasion, and his response was that “his secretive behavior was motivated by his fear as a Jew of persecution and sudden loss.”

-In 2011, alleged Holocaust survivors in Miami, Florida, wanted to sue European insurance companies in order to gain $20 billion in compensation, and wanted Congress to help them achieve that goal.

-In 2011, Menachem Youlus, a rabbi who claimed that he rescued Torah scrolls lost during the Holocaust, was arrested on fraud charges, and accused of fabricating the story.” Youlus was discovered to have used his organization, Save a Torah Inc., to embezzle thousands of dollars.

-In 2013, Angela Merkel declared that Germany has an “everlasting responsibility for the crimes of National Socialism, for the victims of World War II and, above all, for the Holocaust… And this must be made clear from generation to generation, and it must be said with bravery & moral courage, every individual can make a contribution so that racism and anti-Semitism have no chance.”

Note: 9 million of the world’s 16 million Jews are still collecting “reparations” because the benefits have been extended to children & dependents born to the “survivors”, even those born after WW2. Apparently they get $35,000 for signing up with $2,000 per month for life, and free medical. The “official” Jewish definition of Holocaust is “any” territory that Germany occupied during WW2. Thus, if Germans controlled a town for a single day, then any Jew who lived in that town is a “holocaust survivor”. That’s why there are so many “holocaust survivors”.


THE SOAP FABRICATION


And almost every year, we are discovering that the Holocaust industry is a one of the biggest rackets of the 20th, and now the 21st Century. But the issue of racketeering goes much deeper, and it is the by-product of a “lying” ideology.

For example, the idea (lie) that National Socialists Germany made soap out of Jewish fat was largely engineered by Simon Wiesenthal, co-founder of the Jewish Historical Documentation Center in Austria, and founder of the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles, California. The idea was so popular then that it was later uncritically accepted as fact in popular history books, such as “The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich”, by William L. Shirer, which is a book that the shill for Jewry, Alex Jones, promotes as truth.

Even before that, the most famous Jewish propagandist of that era, Ilya Ehrenburg, made it clear in his book, “The Complete Black Book of Russian Jewry” that “in another section of the Belzec camp was an enormous soap factory. The Germans picked out the fattest people, murdered them, and boiled them down for soap. The Gestapo thugs never denied the existence of a ‘production process’ of this kind. Whenever they wanted to imitate a Jew, they would say to him, ‘We’ll make a soap out of you.’”

Previously Ehrenburg wrote, “The Jews were taken into an enormous hall that could hold up to a thousand people. The Germans had led electric wires along the walls of the hall. The wires had no insulation. The same wires also ran across the floor. As soon as the hall was filled with naked people, the German ran a powerful electrical current through the wires… It was one huge electric chair. The likes of which no criminal fantasy has ever dreamt up.”

These powerful Jewish assertions (lies) & imaginary reactions had a strong & detrimental effect on the “Holocaust” (Holohoax) story. These stories were also presented at the Nuremberg Trial of 1945-1946, and were later established to be “true”, via tortured confessions. Even alleged “eyewitnesses” were summoned to testify that they actually saw the whole event, somehow miraculously surviving the “Holocaust”.

A large part of Europe ended up believing the Jewish soap story. In America, the story was even more incredible & hysterical. Soviet Jewish leader, Solomon Mikhoels, from Moscow, would tour the United States showing his audience a bar of soap which he maintained was a direct result of Jewish soap manufactured by “Nazi” Germany.

Ilya Ehrenburg cited one bank clerk, Arthur Rozenshtraukh, who “held this ‘Jewish soap’ in his own hands.” So after World War 2, a number of books & articles immediately began to pick up the idea and propagated it as historical truth; and during the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, the Jewish soap story was established as a “historical” event.

The Jewish writer, Max I. Dimont, made those ideas even more popular in his book, “Jews, God and History”, first published in 1962. Over a million and half copies of this book were sold.

The grisly tale of human beings rendered into soap has long been rejected by historians as a recycled left-over from the First World War, when similar atrocity stories were staples of Allied propaganda.

When the soap story first came out, it was rejected by a number of people who were labeled “Holocaust deniers”. They were persecuted, harassed and were even called anti-Semites for exposing it. Yet when the soap story turned out to be false, popular historians gave no credit where credit is due. Those “Holocaust deniers” could have accused those popular historians of plagiarism.

Even the Israeli documentation center, Yad Vashem, in Jerusalem, stays away from the soap story as much as possible. They declared, “There is no documentary evidence that the Nazis made soap out of human fat.”

Yet no matter how many times a lie is repeated, always keep in mind that truth in the end will triumph. No serious historian would now maintain that the soap idea can sustain any historical & forensic validity, unless he wants to lose his credibility as a historian.

Even Jews who would hold the most extreme views of the Holocaust would grudgingly back away from the idea. Deborah Lipstadt, of Emory University, told the Los Angeles Times, in 1981, “The fact is that the Nazis never used the bodies of Jews, or for that matter anyone else, for the production of soap.”

Amazingly, even today, there are a number of people who still maintain that there might have been some truth to the story. Michael Shermer of Skeptic Magazine and his co-author Alex Grobman of the Simon Wiesenthal Center wrote a section about the soap story in their book, “Denying History”.

Shermer declares himself to be a skeptic, but he does not apply his skeptical skills to the claims that have been made by the Holocaust establishment. He claims that extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence, but Shermer still believes that there was probably some truth in the soap story, despite the fact that he does not provide the evidence for this. Skeptics should be skeptic of Michael Shermer.

THE HOAX OF SIMON WIESENTHAL


Simon Wiesenthal, according to the secular standard, is a “Nazi Holocaust” hero. He was nominated four times for the Nobel Peace Prize. Yet, until 2009, no one was able to decipher the complete hoaxes & frauds fabricated by Wiesenthal.

Even a “Nazi Hunter”, British writer, Guy Walters, had to admit, “His (Wiesenthal) reputation is built on sand. He was a liar, and a bad one at that. From the end of the Second World War to the end of his life in 2005, he would lie repeatedly about his supposed hunt for Eichmann as well as his other Nazi-hunting exploits. He would also concoct outrageous stories about his war years and make false claims about his academic career.”

“There are so many inconsistencies between his three main memoirs and between those memoirs and contemporaneous documents, that it is impossible to establish a reliable narrative from them. Wiesenthal’s scant regard for the truth makes it possible to doubt everything he ever wrote or said.”

“Some may feel I am too harsh on him and that I run a professional danger in seemingly allying myself with a vile host of neo-Nazis, revisionists, Holocaust deniers and anti-Semites. I belong firmly outside any of these squalid camps and it is my intention to wrestle criticism of Wiesenthal away from their clutches. His figure is a complex and important one. If there was a motive for his duplicity, it may well have been rooted in good intentions.

The “Nazi Hunter” Walters has meticulously gone over many of Wiesenthal’s obvious lies & fabrications in his book, called “Hunting Evil”. Even Deborah Lipstadt, who defends the Jewish “Holocaust” narrative, declared that Wiesenthal is a charlatan and is not interested in the truth.

THE HOLOHOAX LIE BEGINS TO DIE


Quote:
The Holohoax was the single greatest touch of genius the Jews ever perpetrated against the White race. This could not have occurred at any other point in history simply because the tools of mass media propagation did not exist. They bought most channels of media (newspapers, magazine, print ads, radio) prior to World War 2, and then seamlessly embedded their Holohoax lie to the unsuspecting & ill prepared masses. Now because of the Internet, White people can uncover the truth about Jewish lies and the Jews house of cards is tumbling down never to be rebuilt. They are desperate and are taking desperate measures. They see the writing on the wall of a terrible demise coming their way and are throwing all their cards on the table now in hopes of stopping the inevitable White insurrection.” -Anonymous blog commenter
The credulity of the White race in believing the far-fetched, ridiculous, and often contradictory Holohoax fantasy has been an unmitigated disaster for the White race. The fraud of the Holohoax has been much more, and much worse, than a multi-billion dollar cash cow for the Jews behind this blatant scam.

It is one of the Semitic “Big Lies” that the International Jewry uses to claim moral authority over Whites, and to manipulate the uniquely altruistic & compassionate White race into feeling undeserved guilt for alleged atrocities that, strictly speaking, never happened.

The Holohoax is the reason that the Jews use in their unjustifiable efforts to characterize themselves as victims. In typical Jewish hypocrisy, a feature of the Great Jewish Mask, they claim to be victims of the serfs over whom they rule through the corruption of our governments.

Noticing any of this a thought-crime in most Western Countries, and is immediately met with Jewish wailing about the Holohoax coupled with anti-Semitism “Hate Speech” violations.

Thankfully, the Holohoax appears to have run its course, as common sense is purging this vile mental poison from the collective psyche of the White race. It has become increasingly difficult for sane White people to believe outlandish lies about Six Million Jews being killed in World War 2.

Even the Holohoaxers themselves now admit…

-Forensic tests on the “gas chambers” do not reveal any trace of “gas” or “poison”.

-Millions of corpses or remains were never discovered.

-There is no German documentation of any mass killing.

-Tales of Jews being made into bars of soap & lampshades were invented.

-Zyklon B was a pesticide developed to kill typhus-lice, not people.

-The Holocaust story relies heavily upon Soviet reports.

-Soccer games and other forms of entertainment took place in the camps.

-The International Red Cross had access to all camps and never mentioned any mass killings.

-Some Jewish “survivors” claimed they knew nothing about “gas chambers” in Auschwitz.

Whites are starting to question why pictures of German typhus victims and pictures German civilian victims of Allied war crimes are being offered by Holocaust so-called historians as supposed evidence of a fictitious Holohoax.


International Jewry is in a panic as their most reliable weapon for instigating White abasement is rapidly becoming obsolete. Predictably, these Jews who are obsessed with tall tales about “camps” are preparing to use the threat of state violence to force-feed Holohoax propaganda to a new generation of gullible & defenseless White children.

Quote:
A third of people in major European countries know little or nothing about the Holocaust.” -Huffington Post (2018)
A recent Claims Conference study showed that the American people’s knowledge of the Holocaust was unexpectedly low, particularly among Millennials, born between 1977 & 2000. The survey revealed that 66 percent of these Millennials could not identify what “Auschwitz” was, and 41 percent thought that 2 million or fewer Jews were murdered during the Holocaust.

There are promising signs that the hold of the Holohoax over the young minds of the White Race is beginning to slip. As International Jewry becomes increasingly brazen & arrogant in their subversion of White nations and their attempts to exterminate the White race, the unfounded guilt-complex so adamantly accepted by Whites in the past & today will be exposed for the ridiculousness that it truly is.

Whites must expose the crimes International Jewry and understand that the Jews, as a collective, are their racial enemy, who relentlessly works to destroy the White race.

White people must awaken to the fact that International Jewry is in control, directly or indirectly, of nearly every institution in the West; and that the commonality of this control is easily observable by the degeneracy, miscegenation, and empty hedonism promoted by these Judaic institutions.

The Great Jewish Mask must be unmasked! The Holohoax must be exposed!


Quote:
It is not you who pronounce judgment upon us, it is the eternal Court of History which will make its pronouncement upon the charge which is brought against us. The judgment that you will pass, that I know. But that Court will not ask of us, ‘Have you committed high treason or not?’ That Court will judge us… who as Germans have wished the best for their people and their Fatherland, who wished to fight and to die… You may declare us guilty a thousand times, but the goddess who presides over the Eternal Court of History will, with a smile, tear in pieces the charge of the Public Prosecutor and the judgment of the Court; for she declares us guiltless.” -Hitler
Watch the biggest cover-up in history… Hellstorm: The real genocide of National Socialist Germany. An actual Holocaust by Jewry used against the German people. https://www.hellstormdocumentary.com/

http://www.renegadetribune.com/its-a...be-fooled-pt8/
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:42 AM.
Page generated in 0.29693 seconds.