Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old April 23rd, 2018 #1
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,694
Exclamation Is False-Flag Attack On US Navy Ship Next?

23.04.2018

Is False-Flag Attack On US Navy Ship Next?



The USS Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group left the east coast Naval Station Norfolk, VA on 11th April.

The aircraft carrier is accompanied by the guided-missile cruiser USS Normandy, the guided-missile destroyers USS Burke, Bulkeley, Forest Sherman and Farragut, and the destroyers USS Jason and The Sullivans. The strike group carries 6,500 sailors and Carrier Air Wing One.

Recent announcements about Russia’s hypersonic Kinzhal (‘Dagger’) missile system having made these vessels effectively obsolete, this means that the ships and their crews are essentially being sailed into a bloody scrapyard.

Even without the recent upgrading of the Kinzhal system, the experience of the British fleet in the Falklands conflict illustrates the vulnerability of warships to low-flying missiles. In addition to the sinking of the HMS Sheffield and Sir Galahad, virtually every British ship was hit by at least one of Argentinian’s French-made Exocet missiles – a weapons system which was already 20 years old at the time.

Exocet missile sinks HMS Sheffield during Falklands War:

Reportedly the only thing that saved the UK force from obliteration was that the Argentinians had got their missile altimeter settings wrong. The Russians will not make the same sort of error!
These facts are of course known to the US military planners and – one would assume and hope, for it is duty to know – by Donald Trump. And yet the US fleet is now nearing the coast of Syria, where it will met up with American and other NATO warships already in position. Together, they will make one big flock of sitting ducks.

If the people pushing Trump manage to get him launch a new strike on Syria (and we must expect a new false flag attack) and if the massive increase in NATO firepower means that enough missiles get through to enough targets to kill Russians, then Putin really has no choice but to sink the US fleet.
No choice because, whatever the danger of doing so, failure to respond would signal Russian defeat and retreat in Syria, which would of course lead to a rapid escalation of military pressure against Lebanon and Iran, and mean that when the Empire then rolls on to strike Russia, her most reliable allies will already have gone and her ‘soft underbelly’ will be seriously exposed.

So Putin orders the destruction of the US fleet, and an hour later all that is left is debris and mangled corpses in some oil slicks – and some ‘great’ photos and video clips to illustrate Trump’s declaration of war on account of “Russia’s deadly sneak attack on a US humanitarian force”.

Sounds familiar? It should do. Because we’re not just thinking here of the USS Maine, the Lusitania and the Gulf of Tonkin. The Washington habit of using sunken ships as the causus belli also of course included Pearl Harbor.
Just in case you need a reminder, here’s just one example of the many short videos out there on the truth about the Japanese attack on 7th December 1941 which explain how Roosevelt had advance intelligence of the planned attack, but decided not to pass it on to the anchored sitting duck fleet:

The more or less official excuse (the President’s guilt never having been formally acknowledged) is that to have alerted the fleet would also have tipped off the Japanese that their naval codes had already been broken. But the truth is of course that deliberately didn’t warn the fleet because he knew that the sacrifice would goad the American people into a war against Hitler to which he and those around and behind him were committed, but which the American people opposed.

The circumstances this time are of course somewhat different, not least that everyone with even a passing knowledge of the Russian missile capability already knows that 6,500 sailors are “on their way to Samara”.
Which makes Donald Trump either a criminally incompetent fool, a bad poker player or a wholly controlled puppet of the psychotic Anglo-Zionist elite. If he is one of the first two of these, then there is of course still a chance that he might respond to the disaster by blinking and retreating. In which case, the Beltway elite will use the human tragedy and his humiliation to remove him from office (not a bad consolation prize, from their point of view).

But if he is the third, then the ‘shock’ blitz on the US fleet will lead to the immediate declaration of World War Three.

Indeed, if things get that far (and we’re probably 48 hours and one White Helmets’ video away from it) then the only thing that realistically stands a chance of stopping the racist Anglo-Zionist psychopaths in their tracks is if the Russian attack and its result are such a devastating show of ‘shock and awe’ as to make it impossible for them to ignore a simultaneous public warning by Putin to Netanyahu that any further US hostile response will place Israel directly in the firing line as well.

That might JUST be enough to make the Neocons back off. If not, then World War Three it will be. It might not go nuclear straight away, but even while it is conventional EVERYTHING will change:

Dissident anti-war voices such as this will rapidly be silenced by blanket censorship and internment; your sons and daughters will be conscripted; your taxes will go through the roof – and you will have to live with the ever-present fear that, once China enters the war against Washington and its client states, the tide will run so fast against the ‘democratic allies’ that their ‘humanitarian missiles’ will end up with nuclear tips.

If that disturbs you (and it surely should) then all I ask is that you take the Pearl Harbor analogy and get busy spreading it on social media RIGHT NOW. Because once those young sailors and airmen have been sacrificed, the demand for a war of ‘revenge’ will be unstoppable. But if the warmongers realize that plenty of people have already understood the plan, it might just spook them into backing off.

In which case the fleet can do a few face-saving manoeuvres and then sail home again and we can look forward to a summer which may be warm, but not as uncomfortably hot as it could otherwise become!

https://southfront.org/is-false-flag...avy-ship-next/
__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race


''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers
 
Old April 23rd, 2018 #2
Ray Allan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 15,173
Default

In 2005, a diesel-electric-powered Swedish submarine managed to 'sink' a u.s carrier in an exercise, penetrating the carrier's protective screen of cruisers, destroyers and other ships. A French nuclear-powered sub was able to do the same thing to the carrier Theodore Roosevelt in the Atlantic just a couple of years ago. So it's certainly possible to send one of those dinosaurs to the bottom. Russia has even better submarines and anti-ship missiles. Would Russia risk WW3 by doing something like that? I can't answer that for certain, but they will not be the aggressors, I'm pretty sure of that. If the Harry S. Truman or any other ZOG tub is turned into an artificial reef, it will be the work of ZOG itself, either a u.s. or Israeli submarine or missile attack.
__________________
"Military men are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy."

--Henry A. Kissinger, jewish politician and advisor

Last edited by Ray Allan; April 23rd, 2018 at 03:43 PM.
 
Old April 23rd, 2018 #3
notmenomore
Senior Member
 
notmenomore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,633
Default

Carriers only have strategic value against 3rd world nations with virtually no navies or air forces. The carriers are useful in those situations for providing a movable, off-shore airfield for the Kwan air forces to harras and bully the third worlders.

Against any modern, 1st world power the carriers are hopelessly anachronistic and obsolete. This is generally understood, but no doubt there are a few hard-heads in the Kwa who just may not get it. Just the right kind of push past the limit will certainly see one of these behemoths on the bottom.
__________________
No way out but through the jews.
 
Old April 23rd, 2018 #4
Jeffrey Smither
Senior Member
 
Jeffrey Smither's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 4,643
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by notmenomore View Post
Carriers only have strategic value against 3rd world nations with virtually no navies or air forces. The carriers are useful in those situations for providing a movable, off-shore airfield for the Kwan air forces to harras and bully the third worlders.

Against any modern, 1st world power the carriers are hopelessly anachronistic and obsolete. This is generally understood, but no doubt there are a few hard-heads in the Kwa who just may not get it. Just the right kind of push past the limit will certainly see one of these behemoths on the bottom.
The Chinks in China just recently built a mega sized aircraft carrier. I dunno what useful purpose it serves unless they planned on getting into a war with the KWA and could use it to penetrate the KWA airspace. Who know how long it will stay afloat if cheap Chinese steel and chink craftsmanship was used on it.

I don't even see why they keep sending them to the Yellow Sea and around North Korea. If the KWA needed to take that third world country out they could simply use some missiles. A waste of government money having all these carriers around the globe.
 
Old December 27th, 2022 #5
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Serbian View Post

Sounds familiar? It should do. Because we’re not just thinking here of the USS Maine, the Lusitania and the Gulf of Tonkin. The Washington habit of using sunken ships as the causus belli also of course included Pearl Harbor.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:49 AM.
Page generated in 0.39742 seconds.