Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old April 24th, 2013 #101
Dawn Cannon
Senior Member
 
Dawn Cannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The Vampire Ball
Posts: 6,409
Thumbs up Israel’s first military mistake will be its last, Iran warns

TEHRAN – Iranian Defense Minister Ahmad Vahidi has said that the first mistake of Israel in any military action against Iran would be its last mistake because Iran would not give it any chance, implying that Iran’s military response would cripple the Zionist regime forever.

Commenting on the latest statements by U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, who said on Sunday that a $10 billion arms deal, planned with Israel and the United States’ Arab allies, sent a “very clear signal” to Iran that military options remain on the table over its nuclear program, Vahidi said on Wednesday that the U.S. and Israeli threats are empty and prove their aggressive nature.

The Iranian defense minister also stated that it is unfortunate that the U.S. defense policy is dictated by the Zionist lobby and advised U.S. officials that it would be better if they resolve their own people’s problems instead of issuing inhumane, warmongering threats against other countries.

Elsewhere in his remarks, Vahidi said that the Iranian people’s participation in presidential and city and village council elections in June will foil the enemies’ plots against the country and will be a decisive response to their pressure, threats, and sanctions.

http://www.tehrantimes.com/component...article/107119
 
Old April 24th, 2013 #102
Hunter Morrow
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,803
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by littlefieldjohn View Post
quote

JERUSALEM -- Israel's defense minister said Iran has slowed the timetable for enriching enough uranium to build nuclear weapons, implying that Israel would have more time to decide whether to strike Iran's enrichment facilities.

Ehud Barak's assertion that Iran has "essentially delayed their arrival at the red line by eight months," is in line with the timeframe laid out by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in September, when he spoke at the U.N. General Assembly.
Oh, of course. The redline wasn't met, the deadline wasn't met. Iran is a technologically advanced, first world nation with 80
million people in it. If they wanted nuclear weaponry, they'd have it.

You can find people crying about Iran's "imminent" creation of nuclear weaponry in the 1980s. I think the most prominent examples of
this are all the New York Times, Los Angeles Times and Washington Times articles about Iran being "5 years away or less" on nuclear bombs...
In 1992.

Oops, only off by 16 years.

http://www.hangthebankers.com/propag...st-has-a-nuke/

Perpetually 3 to 5 years away from making what the U.S. did in 2 years more than 60 years ago. Strange.
 
Old April 25th, 2013 #103
Roy Wagahuski
professional critter
 
Roy Wagahuski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: under your bed
Posts: 1,618
Default

Recounting the timeline of lies projecting Iran's nuclear weapon capability, narrated by snordelhans:

__________________
"Don't underestimate the power of 'evil.' ... The fact is, 'evil' makes women horny and men curious. Use those to further the cause."
 
Old June 17th, 2013 #104
Togar mah
Senior Member
 
Togar mah's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 511
Default

Patrick Clawson of the influential Neocon Washington Institute for Near East Studies suggests that the US should provoke Iran into taking the first shot.
 
Old September 28th, 2013 #105
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,679
Default

Israel: Iran Distracting World From Nuclear Work With Nuclear Talks

Israeli Media Issuing Increasingly Absurd Claims


by Jason Ditz, September 27, 2013

Print This | Share This


Israeli Strategic Affairs Minister Yuval Steinitz angrily condemned Iranian President Hassan Rouhani today, accusing him of trying to “divert attention” from the ongoing international dispute over the Iranian nuclear program by spending so much time talking about that self-same program.


“The man is an expert with tricks,” Steinitz reasoned, arguing that all the talk about a nuclear-free Middle East amounted to an anti-Israel plot, since Israel is the only nation in the region with nuclear weapons.

Steinitz’s comments are just the latest in an array of Israeli comments condemning peace talks with Iran in general, and pushing Western nations to tell Iran, now that it has elected a pro-diplomacy president, that it is “too late” for diplomacy.

Some analysts inside Israel have warned the nation’s anti-peace policy is putting them in an ugly spot diplomatically, though with Israel’s domestic media reporting absurd falsehoods as absolute fact, the policy seems like it might have some currency.

Today alone Israeli outlets reported simultaneously that Iran already had nuclear weapons, and simultaneously that they believe Iran could make enough 92 percent uranium to make a bomb within 2 months, even though Iran has never even attempted enrichment beyond 20 percent.


http://news.antiwar.com/2013/09/27/i...nuclear-talks/
__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race


''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers
 
Old September 29th, 2013 #106
littlefieldjohn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
Default Iran: More needed than just a phone call from the head nigger

Quote:
TEHRAN (FNA)- Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araqchi underlined that Tehran will continue uranium enrichment under any condition, adding that Iranian negotiators will not put full trust in the US in their future talks.
"We have never trusted the US 100 percent and we will not put 100 percent trust (in the US) in future path (of action and negotiation)," Araqchi said in a televised interview with Iran's state-run TV on Saturday night.
"Definitely, a history of high tensions between Tehran and Washington will not go back to normal relations due to a phone call, meeting or negotiation".

Asked about Tehran's reaction to the US and other world powers' possible demand for the suspension of Iran's nuclear enrichment program in future negotiations, he said, "We have been insisting on the impossibility of the suspension of enrichment for 10 years."

"Enrichment will continue under any condition and this is our definite position," he said, but meantime added, "The frameworks, level, amount, form and place of enrichment is liable to negotiation."

Iran has so far ruled out halting or limiting its nuclear work in exchange for trade and other incentives, saying that renouncing its rights under the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) would encourage the world powers to put further pressure on the country and would not lead to a change in the West's hardline stance on Tehran.

Iran is under four rounds of UN Security Council sanctions for turning down West's calls to give up its right of uranium enrichment. The United States and the European Union have ratcheted up their sanctions on Iran this year to force it to curb its nuclear program.

Iranian officials have always shrugged off the sanctions, saying that pressures make them strong and reinvigorate their resolve to further move towards self-sufficiency.










http://english.farsnews.com/newstext...13920707000428
 
Old September 30th, 2013 #107
littlefieldjohn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
Default Netanyahu Meets HNIC, "Urges" Kwa To Keep Iran Sanctions In Place

Quote:
Reuters) - Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu urged U.S. President Barack Obama on Monday to keep sanctions in place against Iran and to even tighten them if Tehran continues its nuclear advances during a coming round of negotiations with the West.

Seeking to ease Israeli concerns about U.S. diplomatic engagement with Iran, Obama said Tehran must prove its sincerity with actions, not just words, and vowed to keep all options on the table, including the possibility of a military response.

Netanyahu was hosted at the White House just three days after Obama and new Iranian President Hassan Rouhani spoke by telephone in the highest-level contact between the countries in more than three decades. The call fueled hopes for a resolution of Iran's decade-old nuclear standoff with the West.

Signs of U.S.-Iranian rapprochement have rattled Israel, , which accuses Iran of trying to buy time and ease international sanctions so it can pursue development of nuclear weapons. Iran denies it is working toward an atomic bomb.



http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/...98T0J920130930
 
Old September 30th, 2013 #108
Jimmy Marr
Moderator
 
Jimmy Marr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Jew S. A.
Posts: 3,679
Default

Commenter on RT refers to Netanyahu as Nut-N-Yahud

http://rt.com/usa/obama-netanyahu-iran-monday-545/
 
Old November 1st, 2013 #109
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

re: re: Mushroom Clouds
Thomas DiLorenzo

You are prescient, Butler. This article in the Jerusalem Post announces that Sheldon Adelson says “the U.S. should drop an atomic bomb on Iran.” If such a horror were ever to take place (after the billionaire Adelson bribes enough American politicians to do so), Adelson would well deserve the title of The Jewish Hitler.

So let’s dissect the Sheldon Adelson theory of foreign policy: Iran does not threaten to harm anyone or anything in the U.S. But the Israeli Likud Party does not like the Iranian government. The Israelis, however, are too cowardly and too cheap to do anything about it. Therefore, the U.S. government, not the Israeli government, should drop nuclear bombs on Iran, murdering hundreds of thousands if not millions, after which the Iranians and their allies will retaliate in whatever way they can in terrorizing Americans. All of this is to be done in the name of American ”national defense” and “American Exceptionalism.”

http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/...shroom-clouds/



Desperate, Hysterical, Warmongering Propaganda
Thomas DiLorenzo

The top of the Drudge Report today has a picture of what looks like either Nagasaki or Hiroshima with a headline about how Israel claims that Iran will have a nuke in about a month.

Israel already has many nukes, so one has to wonder who the nuker and whom the nukee is supposed to be in the article/photograph.
 
Old November 1st, 2013 #110
N.B. Forrest
Senior Member
 
N.B. Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia, CSA
Posts: 11,145
Default

Quote:
The Israelis, however, are too cowardly and too cheap to do anything about it. Therefore, the U.S. government, not the Israeli government, should drop nuclear bombs on Iran, murdering hundreds of thousands if not millions, after which the Iranians and their allies will retaliate in whatever way they can in terrorizing Americans.
He nails it. Kikes really are physical cowards who want the schtupid goyeem to foot all the bills and take all the risks for them....
__________________
"First: Do No Good." - The Hymiecratic Oath

"The man who does not exercise the first law of nature—that of self preservation — is not worthy of living and breathing the breath of life." - John Wesley Hardin
 
Old November 2nd, 2013 #111
littlefieldjohn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
Default China To Fund Iran Development Projects With $20 Billion In Sanction-Barred Oil Money: Report

Quote:
TEHRAN, Iran -- TEHRAN, Iran (AP) — A report by an Iranian media website says China has agreed to finance $20 billion in development projects in Iran using oil money not transferred to the Islamic Republic because of international sanctions.

The tasnimnews website published a report Saturday quoting prominent lawmaker Hasan Sobhaninia saying the deal was reached during talks between Iran's parliamentary speaker Ali Larijani and Chinese leaders. Larijani visited China this week and Sobhaninia accompanied the speaker.

Iran government spokesman Mohammad Bagher Nowbakht said last week that some $22 billion dollars of Iranian oil money is stuck in China because of sanctions.

The U.S. and its allies have imposed oil and banking sanctions against Iran over its disputed nuclear program. Iran frequently uses barter arrangements because of the sanctions.

China is Iran's top crude oil importer.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/1...n_4202923.html
 
Old November 8th, 2013 #112
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Netanyahu Attack on Iran Deal Threatens Rift With U.S.
By Terry Atlas - Nov 8, 2013 1:11 PM GMT-0600

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s rejection of a potential agreement on Iran’s nuclear program, which he denounced as a “very bad deal,” threatens to ignite the most serious U.S.-Israel dispute in years.

His public criticism follows a series of meetings on the topic with U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, who flew to Geneva today to join talks with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif. They’re seeking to nail down the first step in an accord that would relieve some sanctions against Iran if it curtails certain nuclear activities.

The clash over Iran negotiations follows an effort by President Barack Obama to reassure Netanyahu of his support for Israel, including a trip there in March, after a series of disputes. Kerry’s talks with Netanyahu have sought to avoid a blanket rejection of initial moves toward a nuclear pact, which could fuel opponents in the U.S. Congress pressing to toughen sanctions.

Netanyahu told reporters today that Israel “utterly rejects” and “is not obliged by” an agreement that world powers and Iran are trying to put together. He spoke before a morning meeting with Kerry, who stopped in Tel Aviv from Jordan en route to Geneva for the nuclear talks.

“I understand that the Iranians are walking around very satisfied in Geneva, as well they should be, because they got everything and paid nothing,” Netanyahu said. “Iran got the deal of the century and the international community got a bad deal. This is a very bad deal.”

‘Important Gaps’

Kerry, upon arriving in Switzerland, made a point of saying that negotiators hadn’t concluded the details of a deal “at this point in time.” Brent crude rose for the first time in four days, gaining as much as 1.5 percent after Kerry said “some important gaps” remain.

“The tone of Prime Minister Netanyahu’s comments are sure to cause consternation in the White House,” Robert Danin, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and former U.S. government Mideast policy official, said in an e-mail. “It is too early to say that it will lead to a rift; indeed I don’t think the White House wants that or is prepared to allow one to emerge.”

“But should they come to believe that Netanyahu is trying to mobilize American public opinion against the president’s policies, then there will be a real potential for significant turbulence in the relationship,” Danin said.

Mark Dubowitz, executive director of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies in Washington, who has helped write sanctions legislation, said pressure will build in Congress to move ahead with added strictures against Iran because some allies consider a potential interim nuclear deal to be too weak.

‘Tough Sell’

“My sense is it’s going to be a very, very tough sell to hold off” congressional action on additional sanctions, “especially with the Israelis and the Saudis just completely freaking out,” said Dubowitz, who consults with the Obama administration and Congress on sanctions policy.

The Senate Banking Committee is preparing to discuss legislation imposing new curbs on Iran. Chairman Tim Johnson, a South Dakota Democrat, said in a statement that he hasn’t decided on timing for committee action.

“I don’t know the outcome of negotiations now under way in Geneva, and I plan to wait to hear any results of those talks from our negotiators before making a final decision on any additional sanctions,” Johnson said.

More Sanctions

House Majority Leader jew Eric Cantor, a Virginia Republican jew, said in a statement today that “any agreement that does not require the full and complete halting of the Iranian nuclear program is worse than no deal at all.”

Groups that lobby on Iranian sanctions and nuclear proliferation spent $9.1 million in the three months ended Sept. 30, according to disclosure reports. The 31 organizations that listed Iran among their lobbying issues include the American Petroleum Institute and other oil industry groups.

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee has spent $2.2 million so far this year on lobbying. In each of this year’s disclosure forms, AIPAC has said it is lobbying on “economic and diplomatic tools to stop Iranian nuclear program.”

White House spokesman Jay Carney said in Washington yesterday that Iran has been offered “limited, targeted and reversible relief” from sanctions in return for verifiable concessions on its nuclear program.

Historic Mistake

Netanyahu says a nuclear-armed Iran would threaten Israel’s survival. He said yesterday that moderating pressure on the Iranians would be a “mistake of historic proportions.” Iran says its nuclear program is peaceful.

The Israeli leader has urged the U.S. and five other powers taking part in the talks with Iran -- France, Germany, the U.K., Russia and China -- to reject any proposal unless it ensures a halt to all Iranian uranium enrichment and the construction of a plutonium-producing reactor.

The tensions over Iran have frayed relations that Netanyahu and the White House have worked to repair in recent months. The friction has also clouded Kerry-led efforts to negotiate an agreement to end decades of Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Netanyahu last month linked developments on Iran to progress on peacemaking with the Palestinians. He reinforced that linkage today in his remarks before meeting with Kerry, saying his refusal to “compromise on Israel’s security and our vital interests” extends to talks with the Palestinians.

‘Selling Out’

Iran has asserted its right to enrich uranium and has said it will accept tougher safeguards to meet international concerns while continuing some level of enrichment.

A public U.S.-Israeli dispute over an Iran deal could lead to the worst tensions between the allies since 1992, when then-Secretary of State James Baker said President George H.W. Bush wouldn’t approve $10 billion in loan guarantees to help house emigrating Soviet Jews unless Israel promised to halt settlement expansion. Before that dispute was resolved, some Israeli cabinet members said Bush was an anti-Semite and anti-Israel.

Netanyahu said today Israel’s concerns about the nature of an Iran deal are “shared by many, many in the region, whether or not they express that publicly.”

The “essence of the concern” is that “America is selling out too cheaply and it’s giving in, an extremely serious change in the whole balance of power in the region,” said Jonathan Rynhold, a researcher at the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies at Bar-Ilan University near Tel Aviv.

To contact the reporter on this story: Terry Atlas in Geneva at [email protected]

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-1...with-u-s-.html
 
Old March 18th, 2014 #113
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Israel Provided IAEA with Fake Documents on Iran’s Nuclear Program
Michael S. Rozeff

So charges Gareth Porter in a new exclusive interview. His comments about IAEA infighting are of interest in explaining why the IAEA accepted false intelligence. He presents his view of the Bush administration’s plans to create a cause for war with Iran and use the military option. He also points out that the CIA turned against Iran to get back for its losses in Lebanon in the mid-eighties. Porter first made this charge several years ago.

------------------------------


Israel Provided IAEA with Fake Documents on Iran’s Nuclear Program

MONDAY, MARCH 17, 2014
Iran Review’s Exclusive Interview with Gareth Porter

By: Kourosh Ziabari

The controversy surrounding Iran’s nuclear program in the recent decade has been the subject of millions of statements, thousands of news stories and articles, hundreds of speeches and interviews and tens of books and films. One of the most brilliant, revealing and educative books about Iran’s standoff with the West over its civilian nuclear program has been recently published by the prominent American investigative journalist Gareth Porter.

Gareth Porter is a leading American journalist, historian, anti-war activist and correspondent of the Vietnam War. Porter’s writings have appeared on such publications as The Nation, Inter Press Service, The Huffington Post, Truthout, Al-Jazeera, Press TV, Antiwar.com and Common Dreams. Porter is the 2012 winner of Martha Gellhorn Prize for Journalism, which is awarded annually to a journalist who exposes media propaganda.

Gareth Porter has recently published a book titled “Manufactured Crisis: The Untold Story of the Iran Nuclear Scare” which discloses the unseen and masked truths behind the decade-long standoff over Iran’s nuclear program. In this book, Porter endeavors to reveal the destructive role Israel has played in the exacerbation of Iran’s relations with the West over the former’s nuclear activities. Porter maintains that Iran’s nuclear program is completely legal and regularly inspected, abused by the United States and Israel as a pretext for pressuring Iran.

The former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia Charles W. Freeman is one of many high-ranking diplomats and academicians who have praised Porter’s book. He writes, “Want to understand why a peaceful U.S. modus vivendi with Iran has been so elusive? Read this exceptionally timely, gripping account of the Iranian nuclear program and the diplomacy surrounding it! Porter meticulously documents both Iranian misjudgments and American and Israeli diplomatic overreach based on willful self-deception and political, bureaucratic, and budget-motivated cherry-picking of intelligence to support unfounded preconceptions.”

On the publication of Gareth Porter’s vital book on Iran’s nuclear program by the Just World Books publications, Iran Review has conducted an exclusive interview with the American journalist and has asked him some questions on the important aspects of Iran’s nuclear program and its ongoing disputes with the West, which seem to be solved gradually during the course of talks between Iran and the P5+1 (five permanent members of the UN Security Council plus Germany.)

Gareth Porter believes that although the U.S. President Barack Obama regularly talks of all options being on the table in dealing with Iran’s nuclear program, his government does not have a clear understanding of what these options are: “under Bush, at least in the early period, there was an overt understanding between Israel and the top policymakers in the Bush administration that they would follow a joint strategy which was aimed at regime change, but that’s not the case with Obama. His policy is much more ambiguous and less distinct. I think he wants to resolve the issue, but he is still under the pressure from the Israeli lobby which restricts his freedom of action. He and his senior advisors are under the influence of a false narrative for so long that I don’t think they understand what the real options are.”
What follows is the text of Iran Review’s interview with Mr. Porter.

Q: Your recently published book on the controversy surrounding Iran’s nuclear program is titled “Manufactured Crisis,” and as you may admit, Iran’s nuclear program was set in motion in 1950s by the then U.S. President Dwight Eisenhower as part of the Atoms for Peace project for helping Iran meet its growing energy demands. However, following the Islamic Revolution in 1979, the Americans stopped their nuclear cooperation with Iran, and since early 1990s, began intensively pressuring Iran to abandon its nuclear program, while there hasn’t ever been any evidence showing Iran’s diversion to militarization of its nuclear activities. Why do you think the U.S. changed its attitude toward Iran’s nuclear program while they were the ones who started it? Was it a matter of alliance with the United States and compliance with its Middle East policies?

A: I think there are a couple of factors that are combined to influence and shape the U.S. decision-making about the Iranian nuclear program. The first factor is of course that the United States had a foreign policy by 1981-82 to support Saddam Hussein’s war against Iran. It was secretly helping to arm Saddam Hussein and supporting him in various ways. They clearly had a stake in trying to prevent Iran from prevailing in that war and I was told by the former National Security Council staff and specialists on Iran at that time under the Reagan administration that the policy was largely influenced by the 8-year war between Iran and Iraq. I think behind that, of course, there is a much more fundamental element and policy on the part of the United States of hostility toward the Islamic Revolution in Iran as a challenge to the U.S. power prestige in the Middle East, and I would also say that importantly, because of a what I would call a dirty war taking place in Lebanon in the mid-1980s where the CIA was carrying out covert operations, and at the same time, that there were Shiite militias working against the U.S. forces and CIA personnel, in particular in the Beirut area, the CIA lost a significant number of personnel in that dirty war; first there were a group killed in the bombings of the U.S. Embassy and the others were kidnapped and tortured to death. That undoubtedly created a very strong desire on the part of the U.S. national security state to get back and take advantage of the war against Iran, so I think that played a role in the U.S. policy in that period.

Q: So, do you also think that the pressures being put on Iran over its nuclear activities is part of a U.S. strategy to prevent Iran from becoming a regional superpower through acquiring a nuclear capability?

A: I’m not exactly sure how you are using the term nuclear capability. I assume you mean becoming a superpower by having a nuclear program. Is that what you mean?

Q: Well, I actually mean acquiring nuclear capability will be a deterrent for Iran and it might dissipate Israel’s nuclear monopoly in the Middle East even though we know Iran’s nuclear program is solely aimed at peaceful purposes.

A: That’s a very much complicated problem to disentangle exactly what the strategic calculations are with regards to the relationship between Iran’s nuclear program and Israel’s obviously possessing 300 or so nuclear weapons, and how that plays out. I don’t really think that the United States policy has been based on very finely calculated vision of how things would be in the future. As I point out in the book, the Bush administration’s policy toward Iran was one of a regime change. They really wanted to overthrow the Islamic regime, just as the previous U.S. administrations had wanted to do, going back to the Reagan administration. They believed that they had to use force, and there was no doubt about it, and I think the initial calculation of the Bush administration, which really began in 2002 and 2003, as I point out in the “Manufactured Crisis” was that the United States would be able to use the accusation of an Iranian covert nuclear weapons program as a basis for justifying a military attack on Iran to change the regime. That obviously didn’t play out as they expected.

For one thing, the Bush policy changed from regime change to pressure through sanctions. But I think that was also one of their miscalculations.

I think the Obama administration policy, when it came to power in 2009 was really that they didn’t have a clear strategy toward Iran but was leaning much more toward sanctions as its primary policy rather than diplomacy as it was publicly claiming, especially at the time of the presidential elections. So, generally I think the U.S. policy has been geared to very broad, and in the case of Bush administration, militaristic objectives rather than a very carefully calculated assessment of the region.

Q: You talked about George W. Bush’s policy on Iran. Do you think that his war threats were really credible and serious as he constantly made statements on all options being on the table? He couldn’t ever realize his war threats. Did he really mean what he said that he intended to attack Iran?

A: Well, I don’t think the problem was so much George W. Bush as it was his group of neo-conservative advisors and high officials, specifically the Vice President Dick Cheney and his senior Middle East advisor David Wurmser, as well as John Bolton, the then under-secretary of state in charge of policy toward Iran and the main administration’s policymaker on Iran as well as weapons of mass destruction; we know that Bolton cooperated with the Israeli government closely. He traveled to Israel frequently; he met in some cases with the Mossad chief in 2003, which were not approved by the State Department, and the circumstantial evidence strongly indicate that the manufactured crisis was really planned by Bolton in conjunction with the Israelis. They together mapped out a plan that they expected to lay the groundwork for what they believed would be ultimately the military option on Iran. So, I think we are talking about a plan for striking Iran that was planned by the Israelis and their strongest supporters and allies in the Bush administration.

Q: In your recent book, you imply that the IAEA has been somehow deceived by the reports provided to it by the Western governments, which usually came out from Israel, that there has been a military dimension to Iran’s nuclear program prior to 2003. This is while the IAEA inspectors traveled to Iran and investigated the country’s nuclear facilities in the past decade tens of times. Why is it that the IAEA has been influenced by the Israeli claims while it couldn’t present any evidence to substantiate the claims?

A: The answer to the question is that the safeguards department of the IAEA was led by two individuals during that crucial period when the events took place, who were extremely anti-Iran and pro-Israel, worked closely with the Israelis and were happy to take intelligence from the Mossad and were working hand in glove with the Bush administration and Israel. They were [Pierre] Goldschmidt and [Olli] Heinonen; the two directors of the safeguards department of the IAEA at that period; Goldschmidt from 2003 to 2005 and then Heinonen from 2005 to 2011, and in both cases, it’s clear that they were both much at odds with the view of the Director General of the IAEA Mohamed ElBaradei and other high officials of the IAEA.

In fact, I recently had an interview with the former senior official of the agency who further elaborated on those differences and pointed out that outside the safeguards department, senior officials were not at all convinced by these documents, including the laptop documents which the IAEA called the alleged studies, and the green salt papers, believing that they were probably fabricated, and they suspected Israel all long as the logical candidate. So I think that we have to differentiate within the IAEA between the leadership of the safeguards department who were working closely with the United States and Israel on one hand, and the other senior officials of the agency including of course ElBaradei himself, who were extremely skeptical of that document. I think that the interesting questions is, why ElBaradei thought that he could not prevent particularly since 2008 onward from publishing a series of reports that leaned very strongly toward the U.S.-Israeli position, which other senior IAEA officials including ElBaradei didn’t agree with. I think that the answer is that the IAEA was under very great pressures by the United States and the Europeans, including enormous pressures on ElBaradei to make compromises with regards to their decisions.

Q: Right. I read in Peter Jenkins’ analysis of your book that Israel has fabricated certain documents, including the information said to have been retrieved from a laptop computer in Iran in 2004, as you mentioned earlier, and the fabricated, fake data helped keep Iran’s nuclear controversy alive. Would you please elaborate more on Israel’s involvement in providing the U.S. and the IAEA with the false and groundless data and how they complicated Iran’s nuclear dossier?

A: Well, I think that evidence that Israel was fabricating these documents that the IAEA received in 2005 as well as later documents turned over to the IAEA directly by Israel in 2008 and 2009, according to Mohamed ElBaradei, is very strong, and there are several indicators that it was an Israeli job. One is that we know the Mujahedin-e-Khalq turned these documents over to German intelligence; that’s where they came from. A former German intelligence official gave me a detailed account of that in an interview I did with him last year for my book. So, that’s the first indication that it was an Israeli job, because the MEK, we know, has been used by Israel to provide the intelligence they didn’t want to be known as coming from Israel on more than one occasion. And of course the MEK has let its name to testimony to support the Israeli point of view on accusations of Iranian terrorism, specifically in the case of the Buenos Aires bombing of the AMIA community center in 1994. That’s one indicator.

The second indicator is that we know the Israelis had a program in Mossad to influence the foreign governments and news media on Iran and that office sometimes basically claimed that there were documents that come from inside Iran that they would share with the governments and the press. So they had a special office for operations against Iran. So, I’m quite convinced that Israel was behind these documents.

Q: Many of the sanctions which were imposed on Iran following the publication of the National Intelligence Estimate reports in 2007 that cleared Iran of all the accusations that it’s intending to produce nuclear weapons were hinged on the basis of allegations made by the Israelis like their claims about Iran’s nuclear tests in the Parchin military site. The Americans and the Europeans were frightened and took action to avert the perceived Iranian threat by imposing new rounds of sanctions again and again. However, it’s now clear that the claims were baseless and unfounded. How is Israel going to be held accountable over the prices it imposed on Iran, the United States and Europe by complicating their relationships?

A: I don’t understand why you would expect Israel to be held accountable. There’s no indication that any of the major powers have any intention to hold Israel accountable. I don’t think that’s an issue. I don’t think that’s going to be a realistic possibility.

Q: Are you trying to impart this message in your book that following the collapse of the Soviet Union, the U.S. military-industrial complex needed a new threat and enemy to fight against, and that also Israel was in dire need of an existential threat to deflect attention from its felonies in the Occupied Territories and its brutalities against the Palestinian people and keep up with its project of colonial settlements on the Palestinian lands? Has Iran’s nuclear program served as a pretext for the United States and Israel to further their national interests?

A: Yes, that’s one of the themes of my book. Both the United States national security establishment or the national security state and successive governments, both Labor and Likud in Israel, have found citing the alleged threat of an Iranian nuclear weapon as useful both for domestic politics in the case of Israel, and for essentially making sure that the national security organizations, particularly the CIA and Pentagon continue to get adequate funding after the collapse of the Soviet Union. I have documents on both cases, and some links that is one of the reasons I think this crisis ultimately arose and I’m suggesting that this is the only and necessarily the main reason it’s possible that this couldn’t happen even when the Soviet Union existed.

Q: What do you think about the approach taken by IAEA toward Iran following the stepping down of Mohamed El-Baradei and the beginning of Yukiya Amano’s term? Is it true that Amano has been enormously under the influence of the United States and has failed to provide impartial and unbiased reports on Iran’s nuclear activities?

A: Well, Amano clearly is much more willing to cooperate with the United States than ElBaradei was. I think ElBaradei bowed to some significant extent to the U.S. pressure, allowing the safeguards department to have a sway in determining what would be the IAEA reports in 2008 and particularly in 2009, but Amano clearly has an understanding of the basis on which the United States supported Amano to become the successor to ElBaradei in 2009. This is well-documented in the diplomatic cables released by Wikileaks and we know for sure that Amano has an understanding of the U.S. support strategy when he was about to become the successor to ElBaradei.

Q: What’s your viewpoint regarding the importance of the Geneva interim accord on Iran’s nuclear program and the new round of talks in Vienna for a final, comprehensive agreement between Iran and the six world powers? Do you think that these talks can pave the way for the complete solution of the nuclear standoff and the removal of the unjust economic sanctions?

A: I would be plausibly surprised if that happens. I have to say that I feel overall somehow pessimistic about the possibility for reaching an agreement, but I hope I’m wrong. The reason I’m pessimistic is that I see so many indications that the Obama administration’s senior officials during the course of the negotiations are still very much under the influence of the false narrative that I deconstruct in my book, and I think that is undoubtedly leading the United States toward adopting a much harder line in the negotiations than it would otherwise be the case, and I’m just afraid that there’s not going to be a breakdown in the talks and it’s inevitable.

Q: Having in mind what you just said, do you believe that President Obama is striding on the same path of George W. Bush and following a policy of regime change in Iran under the influence of AIPAC and other Israeli advocacy groups?

A: No, this administration is not the same as the Bush administration with regards to its relationship with Israel and the Israeli lobby. As I said before, under Bush, at least in the early period, there was an overt understanding between Israel and the top policymakers in the Bush administration that they would follow a joint strategy which was aimed at regime change, but that’s not the case with Obama. His policy is much more ambiguous and less distinct. I think he wants to resolve the issue, but he is still under the pressure from the Israeli lobby which restricts his freedom of action. He and his senior advisors are under the influence of a false narrative for so long that I don’t think they understand what the real options are. I think they are under the illusion that they don’t have the freedom to reach an agreement with Iran without risking the United States security and I think they are under a false impression over several issues.

Q: I just want to ask you a final question. What do you think about the impact of the economic sanctions imposed against Iran? Do you think that the sanctions have a legal warranty and justifiability?

A: No way, I don’t believe the sanctions are justified. The entire intention of my book is to show that the U.S. policy in accusing Iran is unjustified and this simply misrepresents the actual history of the interaction between the United States and Iran’s nuclear program. So, there’s no justification to the sanctions.

More By Gareth Porter:

*Misread Telexes Led Analysts to See Iran Nuclear Arms Programme:
http://www.iranreview.org/content/Do...-Programme.htm

*Obama Aides Launch Preemptive Attack on New Iran Plan:
http://www.iranreview.org/content/Do...-Iran-Plan.htm

*IAEA Report Shows Iran Reduced Its Breakout Capacity: http://www.iranreview.org/content/Do...t-Capacity.htm

http://www.iranreview.org/content/Do...ar-Program.htm

Last edited by Alex Linder; March 18th, 2014 at 12:26 PM.
 
Old March 18th, 2014 #114
N.B. Forrest
Senior Member
 
N.B. Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia, CSA
Posts: 11,145
Default

Quote:
There’s no indication that any of the major powers have any intention to hold Israel accountable. I don’t think that’s an issue. I don’t think that’s going to be a realistic possibility.
Cringing whores don't hold their pimps accountable.

Quote:
Both the United States national security establishment or the national security state and successive governments, both Labor and Likud in Israel, have found citing the alleged threat of an Iranian nuclear weapon as useful both for domestic politics in the case of Israel, and for essentially making sure that the national security organizations, particularly the CIA and Pentagon continue to get adequate funding after the collapse of the Soviet Union.
The kikes, the CIA, FBI, the Pentagram & all the other alphabet soup "security" spooks constitute a giant, insatiable tick, itz gray sac abdomen revoltingly engorged with the lifeblood of the goyeem.
__________________
"First: Do No Good." - The Hymiecratic Oath

"The man who does not exercise the first law of nature—that of self preservation — is not worthy of living and breathing the breath of life." - John Wesley Hardin
 
Old March 18th, 2014 #115
M. Issig
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 459
Default

I have never seen a Jew with a dog.
 
Old April 10th, 2014 #116
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,679
Default

U.S. warns Russia over any oil-for-goods deal with Iran

WASHINGTON Thu Apr 10, 2014 5:21pm EDT


S. Treasury Secretary Jack Lew speaks during a news conference with Mexico's Finance Minister Luis Videgaray (not pictured) in Mexico City March 18, 2014 file photo.


(Reuters) - U.S. Treasury Secretary Jack Lew told his Russian counterpart on Thursday that any oil-for-goods deal Moscow might strike with Iran could run afoul of U.S. sanctions.

"Secretary Lew reiterated our serious concerns regarding reports of a possible deal between Russia and Iran involving oil-for-goods," a Treasury representative said in a statement after Lew met with Russian Finance Minister Anton Siluanov.

"He made clear that such a deal ... could trigger sanctions against any entity or individual involved in any related transactions," the representative said.

Lew also told Siluanov a deal would run counter to an agreement between Iran and six world powers, including the United States and Russia, in which Tehran promised to curb its nuclear program in return for a modest easing in Western sanctions. The sanctions were imposed to choke off Iran's oil revenues.

Reuters reported last week that Iran and Russia had made progress on a barter deal that could be worth up to $20 billion under which Moscow would provide Russian equipment and goods in exchange for Iranian oil.

Lew and Siluanov also spoke about Ukraine, with Lew repeating that the United States stood ready to impose additional sanctions on Russia if it continued to step up tensions, according to the spokesperson.

"Lew stated that the United States continues to believe that there is an opportunity to resolve the crisis through diplomacy," the representative said.

The representative added that Lew encouraged Russia to further participate in an international effort to restore Ukraine's economic health, "especially as it relates to the free flow of energy and trade."


http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/...A391Y920140410
__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race


''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers
 
Old April 10th, 2014 #117
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,679
Default

Russia rejects U.S. warnings over oil deal with Iran

Senior diplomat suggests Russia may go ahead with deal to buy Iranian oil, possibly undermining nuclear talks.

By The Associated Press | Apr. 10, 2014 | 2:39 PM



A senior Russian diplomat on Wednesday angrily rejected U.S. warnings against striking an oil-for-goods contract with Iran, saying that Moscow wouldn't be intimidated by threats.

Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov said in remarks carried by the state RIA Novosti news agency that an increase in Russian-Iranian trade is a "natural process that doesn't involve any elements of political or economic challenge to anyone."

Russian business daily Kommersant has reported that Moscow plans to buy 500,000 barrels of Iranian oil a day, a deal that would shatter an export limit defined by an interim nuclear agreement world powers and Iran reached last year.

Iran has agreed to temporarily limit its atomic work, which the West fears could be a cover for developing nuclear weapons, in return for some sanctions relief. Six world powers, including Russia, and Iran are working on a fuller deal that would place long-term restrictions on Iran's nuclear program in exchange for an end to all economic sanctions.

The six-month interim agreement, which went into effect in January and expires in July, allows Iran to continue exporting a total of 1 million barrels a day of oil to six countries: China, India, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Turkey. The promise didn't apply to Russia, which wasn't an existing customer of Iran's petroleum industry.

If Russia reaches the oil-for-goods contract with Iran, it would challenge Western efforts to secure a comprehensive agreement. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said Tuesday that Washington could impose sanctions if Russia and Iran move forward with the oil contract.

Ryabkov said he was unaware of any specific agreements, adding that a "normal exchange of opinions with Iranian colleagues has been going on to determine which sectors of economy are best suited for further development of ties."

He insisted that Russia wants to develop its ties with Iran and rejected the U.S. threat to impose sanctions.

"We don't think that any unilateral U.S. sanctions, no matter whom they target, are legitimate, and we reject such a stance," he said.


http://www.haaretz.com/news/world/1.585008
__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race


''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers
 
Old May 7th, 2014 #118
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,679
jewsign

Immense Explosion in Iran May Have Nuclear Origins

Huge blast in Qazvin, rumored site of nuclear center; 'many casualties' expected
.


AAFont Size
By Eliran Aharon, Tova Dvorin

First Publish: 5/6/2014, 9:15 PM / Last Update: 5/6/2014, 10:57 PM



An immense explosion has been heard throughout the northern Iranian city of Qazvin, semi-official Fars news agency reported, and many casualties are expected from the blast.

Around 1.1 million people live in the city, which is located about 100 miles north of Tehran.

The blast may be related to nuclear development in Iran, according to the Los Angeles Times. Iranian officials in the past have strongly denied claims by Mujahedin Khalq Organization, or MKO, a cult-like Iranian exile group which the US is covertly funding, that it has a secret nuclear enrichment facility in Abyek, near the major city, according to the daily.

The source of the blast remains undetermined. Several mystery explosions have been reported in the past several years in the region, none of which were ever verified.

A fire has now broken out in the city, local reports say, and as many as 50 people are injured. State media blames an oil depot for the blast.

State news agency IRNA reports that firefighters are on the scene. "Firefighters are trying to prevent the spread of the fire at a car oil storage facility," Ali Mohammad Ahani, the director general of Qazvin governor's disaster management authority, stated. Ahani added that no reports of casualties have been recorded.


http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Ne...0#.U2ldEVcVCYQ
__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race


''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers
 
Old July 18th, 2014 #119
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,679
Default

Covert war against Iran's nuclear scientists: a widow remembers

By Scott Peterson15 hours ago

The wife of the first scientist to be assassinated speaks about her husband's growing fear of a net closing around him – and of meeting his Israeli-trained assassin before his execution.

There were no signs of trouble the morning of the assassination.

Iranian scientist Masoud Alimohammadi and his wife woke before dawn and prayed together. Then she prepared breakfast while he made a list of things to do that day.

“He was a very precise person and always wanted everything to go smoothly,” Mansoureh Karami recalls about her husband.

Recommended: How much do you know about Iran? Take our quiz to find out.

That morning Mr. Alimohammadi – a balding man with a thick mustache, close-set eyes, and dozens of published academic papers – said goodbye three times to his wife: when she gave him his packed lunch, as he tightened his shoe laces, and as he got out of his car to close the house's gate behind him.

That's when the explosion came.

A remote-control bomb attached to a motorcycle nearby killed the particle physicist with a lethal spray of metal pellets, giving Iran its first "nuclear martyr" and sending shockwaves through Iran’s scientific and nuclear community.

By the time the fifth nuclear scientist was killed, it was less of a surprise. Those working on Iran's nuclear program had been watching their backs for years.

The covert war waged by the US and Israel against Iran's nuclear program has seen the assassination of five Iranian scientists, malicious computer viruses like Stuxnet, espionage, and unexplained explosions, as well as several apparent attempts by Iran to fight back in kind, with largely unsuccessful operations from India to Georgia to Thailand.

Iran's "nuclear martyrs” have been a rallying point for the country's nuclear program and its “right” to uranium enrichment for years, regardless of the high cost of sanctions. Negotiations in Vienna today seek to curb that program to ensure it can never produce a nuclear weapon – an aim Iran says it rejects.

BEGGING FOR FORGIVENESS

Alimohammadi feared being targeted for his clandestine work, even though few beside his wife knew that he was anything more than a lecturer, or that he had any nuclear expertise. Alimohammadi detected interest in his work outside Iran that prompted him to travel less.

His assassin was an Iranian operative recruited and trained by Mossad, the Israeli spy agency. News reports from Israel indicate that a televised confession by Majid Jamali Fashi, broadcast on Iran state TV in early 2011, was genuine. Speaking from Tehran's Evin prison, the young man described his training – which included working with two new Iranian motorbikes, and a perfect replica of Alimohammadi’s street and house – at a station for Mossad, Israel's spy agency, off the Tel Aviv-Jerusalem highway east of Ben Gurion Airport.

Mr. Fashi pleaded guilty in court, and was sentenced to death. Before he was executed, however, Karami confronted him face-to-face at Evin prison.

“There were many things passing through my mind, of taking revenge,” Karami told The Christian Science Monitor.

She brought the leather satchel her husband used the morning of his death. Eyes brimming with tears, she unpacked it to show how the metal pellets carved through a bound PhD thesis of one of Alimohammadi’s students and tore through his eyeglasses case, breaking the lenses.

Before the meeting, Karami had vowed that, as many pellets as had entered her husband’s head, she would “hammer that many nails in that person’s head.” But when she met Fashi she found a broken man pleading for forgiveness, sobbing so much that he used up an entire box of tissues.

“When I saw him, I saw him being so powerless and small. I said it’s a waste for my hands to expend all this energy [hammering nails],” recalls Karami. She has two grown children, a degree in psychology, and is now pursuing a master’s degree in women’s studies.

“I will never forgive him – there is no place for forgiveness. Because I don’t think he only affected my family, but the whole country,” says Karami, focusing her determined dark brown eyes. “All the people of the world – no matter their beliefs – they still respect their country, and he betrayed his country.”

GROWING FEAR

Alimohammadi had a full public life as a lecturer and quantum field theorist who wrote on subjects from condensed mass physics to black holes. But Karami says there were many signs that his “top secret” nuclear work – unknown even to his mother and sister, says Karami – had attracted scrutiny from outside Iran.

“He was always proud about the fact that the 55 papers he had given were completely different from his nuclear work, so he always said there was a kind of doubt that exists about what he did,” says Karami. She echoes Iranian officials when she adds that the Islamic Republic is not after a nuclear weapon – only scientific development.

Alimohammadi knew he was being monitored by some Western nations and the opposition Mojahidin-e Khalq (MKO/MEK), which in 2002 first exposed the existence of Iran’s uranium enrichment program.

In 2006, for example, a colleague at a conference in Britain was questioned for 24 hours about Alimohammadi’s nuclear activities. In 2008 another colleague was interrogated for 48 hours, perhaps in Italy.

And in 2009, during a hajj pilgrimage to Mecca, Alimohammadi “realized people were filming him and he was being followed,” says Karami. “After that he paid more attention, and went out much less.” A month before his death, he expressed fear he might be kidnapped during a trip to Jordan and felt physically ill before departing.

The couple did not stop their long daily walks in their traditional Gheytariyeh neighborhood in north Tehran or long hikes in the mountains on weekends, but Alimohammadi took precautions.

“Before his death he gave me the number of someone, and said: ‘Whenever I don’t come home, if something happens to me, call this number before calling the police,’” recalls Karami.

When the time came, she says her hands shook so violently that her son had to dial for her.

THE MAKING OF NATIONAL HEROES

Assassin Fashi was one of 10 agents working for Mossad whose arrests were announced by Iran’s intelligence ministry in January 2011. They were heralded as a “remarkable triumph” that showed “intelligence supremacy over the Zionist regime’s espionage system.”

In his televised confession, Fashi said that after his recruitment at an Israeli consulate outside Iran and travel to Israel, he was shown a scale model of Alimohammadi’s home, exact in every detail from the tree and asphalt to the street curb. Reporting from Israel, Time magazine in early 2012 quoted “intelligence sources” confirming Fashi’s “involvement in a Mossad cell that the sources claim was revealed to Iran by a third country.”

Fashi said in his confession, “They told me that the subject of the operation is a person involved in making an atomic bomb and that humankind is in danger and you are the savior.”

Fashi said that after the attack, “I was very proud that I have done something important for the world and then suddenly realized that what I believed in was a lie.”

Four more assassinations of scientists connected to Iran’s nuclear program followed, three by magnetized bombs attached to their cars while stuck in traffic by motorcycle-riding assailants.

Iran is widely believed to have attempted to strike back with copycat attacks. A magnetized bomb attached by a motorcyclist to the car of the wife of the Israeli defense attaché in New Delhi wounded her and three others in February 2012. On the same day, a similar bomb was found attached to a car close to the Israeli embassy in Tbilisi, Georgia. It was defused.

The killings helped make the nuclear issue one of “national dignity,” says Karami. Portraits of the dead scientists were often shown during press conferences held by Iran’s previous top nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili, and are frequently displayed on national days such as the revolutionary anniversary. They have achieved hero status in Iran, ranking among the most revered martyrs of the Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s.

“I know a lot of people in my neighborhood who are not pro-revolutionary. But now [after the assassinations], on the nuclear issue they speak completely for the government,” says Karami. “I am certain of our officials, that they will not forget our martyrs.”


http://news.yahoo.com/covert-war-aga...160612504.html
__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race


''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers
 
Old September 27th, 2014 #120
Dawn Cannon
Senior Member
 
Dawn Cannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The Vampire Ball
Posts: 6,409
Default Iran urges stripping Israel of nuclear capability

VIENNA, Austria – Iran’s Ambassador to International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Reza Najafi has called for international action to strip Israel of its military nuclear capability.

“Israeli dark record of state terrorism, attacks or threat of attacks to the neighbours, and irresponsible and brutal behavior of Israel in the region make it more urgent for the international community to put an end to nuclear capability of this regime,” he said.

“Indeed, Israel has violated all international norms and regulations,” the Iranian envoy said. Najafi made the remarks at an IAEA general conference prior to a vote on a resolution urging Tel Aviv to join the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and put its nuclear facilities under international monitoring.

The resolution, which was backed by 18 Arab countries, fell short of winning the support of the majority of IAEA member states. Countries present at the meeting of the Vienna-based IAEA voted 58-45 against the resolution, while 27 abstained. The resolution was introduced by Kuwaiti Ambassador Sadiq Marafi, who singled out Israel as the only obstacle on a way to create a nuclear weapon-free Middle East.

The Kuwaiti ambassador lashed out at the Tel Aviv regime’s provocative and aggressive attitude in the region. The Tel Aviv regime, which is widely believed to be the only possessor of nuclear arms in the Middle East, reportedly maintains between 200 and 400 atomic warheads. Israel has never allowed any inspection of its nuclear facilities and continues to defy international calls to join the NPT.

Hans Blix, the former head of the IAEA, said in an interview with Press TV that he is convinced Israel possesses nuclear weapons. He called on that Israeli officials join the NPT, saying Tel Aviv’s refusal to sign international nuclear treaties and its deliberate ambiguity policy with regards to its nuclear program are because of Washington’s supports.

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/foreign...ear-capability
__________________
The Bloodbath is Coming
7.6 billion savages multiplying and running wild over the earth, devouring everything in sight, trampling over every other lifeform without mercy or compassion.
 
Reply

Tags
#1, iran, israel

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:20 AM.
Page generated in 0.40008 seconds.