Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old June 24th, 2017 #21
roman1 TITAN
Junior Member
 
roman1 TITAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Russia
Posts: 98
Default

This the text in Russian language. Stalin was secret supporters of monarchy and he greatly restored monarchic elements in USSR:

Quote:
1. честно

Честно. Не могу понять, почему монархисты не любят Сталина. Я не люблю Сталина именно потому, что я не монархист. Сталин довёл монархический принцип до совершенства и максимальной эффективности. Никогда ещё ни одно Одновластие не достигало такой степени успешности и могущества за такой короткий срок. Поэтому странно, что монархисты, причём весомые, респектабельны и умные, его клянут.

2. по порядку
1. Начнём с того, что Сталин вернул монархический порядок почти один в один. Почему это должно отвращать монархистов? И монополия, и почести, и страхи – все типическое. Чего-то не хватало?
Рассмотрим и уточнимся. Монархии – явление династическое. Да, Сталин не имел династического происхождения. Но, во-первых, какое это имеет отношение к принципу монархии? Если настаивать на династической части, то тогда нужно четко определяться, что речь идёт о династической монархии. Но все династические монархии начинали как «простые» — с нуля. Романовы были не исключение.
Можно долго спорить, отъемлемо или неотъемлемо династическое право в монархии, но факт есть факт: Сталин восстановил монархию в техническом и системном смысле.
Кстати, часто слабость монархии подтверждает её конец. А он типический: как масса монархов не могла оставить себе наследников и становилась жертвой переворота, так и Сталин.
В логике монархии действительно самая главная проблема – это адекватный не наследник по крови, а наследник по функции: воспитать мощный лидер себе последователя не может по определению, потому что последователь никогда не будет испытывать на себе то, что испытывает одноличный лидер. Без конкуренции не рождается сильная фигура. Никакие тепличные царские покои (слово-то какое!) не может воспитать бойца. То есть монархия всегда обречена, говоря точно, на кадровую деградацию. Этот показатель у Сталина был вполне по логике кадровой деградации монархии: каждый последующий Генсек был хуже предыдущего.
Настоящий мощный монарх всегда восходил в борьбе с риском для жизни.
Действительно, все самые мощные русские монархи были те, кто бился за власть не на жизнь, а на смерть и пришёл к власти путём лично организованного переворота, как и Сталин, устранив реального последователя Маркса и Ленина — Троцкого.
Два примера: 1. Петр Первый 2. Екатерина Великая. Пётр Первый в борьбе с Софьей и армией, будучи вторым при брате Иване, фактически пришёл в результате переворота (даже двух). Екатерина Великая – однозначно. Кстати, Николай Первый тоже. Не надо забывать, что он тоже переворотчик. Ведь не его свергали декабристы, которые поддержали реального династического монарха – Константина, а он – сверг декабристов! Переворотчки не декабристы, а как раз Николай Первый, которому пришлось подавлять дворянскую оппозицию в формате классического сталинского 37 года. Вот потому и стал мощной фигурой.
Чем же тогда отличается судьба Сталина, писанная под копирку по Логике Монархии? Ведь, как у Петра и Екатерины у него не было ни династийности, ни помазания и благословления.
2. Церковное благословение. Важная часть легитимации. Но опять-таки какое отношение это имеет к принципу чистой монархии – Власти Одного. Ведь монархия не звучит, как династическая помазанная монархия?
А не звучит это потому, что если бы зазвучала, то возникла бы коллизия. Дело в том, что династизм и помазанность – антагонистические виды легитимации, о котором не принято говорить в монархических кругах, но налицо проблема: либо ты помазан, либо династиен. Одно исключает другое: если ты помазан, зачем тебе династийность, если династиен – зачем тебя помазывать?
Это фундаментальное противоречие, как известно, лежит в основе крушения многих монархий, которые так и не могут договориться о том, какой принцип легитимации принять окончательно. И пока они дискутируют, монархия реализуется в единственном реалистическом виде Одновластной Диктатуры. Более того, когда династия рушится, а сознание народа, определяющее строение жизни, монархично, то единственный способ спасти ситуацию — вернуть монархию в практическом виде – Одновластной Диктатурой.
Всё логично. И Сталин – совершенный, аутентичный монарх. Какие могут быть вопросы? Он просто понял ситуацию и никакого социализма строить не стал, а взял монархическую модель как понятную массам и элитам, которые еще вчера были крестьянами, которым нужен был такой же монарх, и спас ситуацию. Сталин – реставратор монархии, о чем, кстати, с удовольствием писал – и не без оснований — Троцкий, вербуя сторонников для заговора (почему и заговор и имел успех).
Но именно восстановление монархии стало одним из объяснений причин его успеха: он строил новое, а полностью взял монархическую модель. Он понимал, что невозможно решать одновременно две исторические задачи – строить новое общество и спасать страну от ликвидации. Я, к примеру, не знаю ещё ни одного новатора, который бы в горящем доме, тонущем корабле или нападении бандитов думал о новизне своих открытый и ставил бы задачу открытия нового прежде своего спасения.
3. что-то в этой нелюбви не то
Ненависть монархистов к Сталину попахивает нехорошим душком. Очевидно, что он воплотил именно монархию, а никакой социализм.
Не пора ли монархистам принять его за своего?

Автор текста Магнитов С.Н.
Оригинал статьи находится здесь: unicom15.ru/index.php/staliniz/417-stalin-i-monarkhisty
 
Old June 28th, 2017 #22
GoldfingerSRB
Member
 
GoldfingerSRB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Srbija
Posts: 274
Default

Stalin-haters care to explain me why Stalin is most popular historical figure in Russian society, even exceeding such pro-White politician as Putin so far?

Quote:
Soviet leader Josef Stalin has been named the most outstanding person in history in a Russian poll despite executing more than a million people in political purges.

The survey by the Levada Center in Moscow released Monday showed 38 percent of those two took part chose Stalin.

The figure is in stark contrast to the mere 12 percent who picked him in 1989 when Russians were beginning to discover the crimes of the Stalin regimeSoviet leader Josef Stalin has been named the most outstanding person in history in a Russian poll despite executing more than a million people in political purges.

Scholars estimate under Stalin more than a million people were executed in political purges.
Millions more died in the vast prison camp system or as a result of mass starvation and deportations.

But an increasing number of Russians now admire Stalin as a strong leader who led their country to victory in World War Two. Scholars estimate under Stalin more than a million people were executed in political purges.

Millions more died in the vast prison camp system or as a result of mass starvation and deportations.

But an increasing number of Russians now admire Stalin as a strong leader who led their country to victory in World War Two.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ng-person.html
 
Old June 28th, 2017 #23
Moroz
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 17
Default

I see that you vatniks are spreading pro-USSR and pro-Putin rubbish here. Wonder what others might think of that.
 
Old June 29th, 2017 #24
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,689
Default

Stalin’s Fight Against International Communism

Kerry Bolton

https://www.counter-currents.com/201...nal-communism/
__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race


''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers
 
Old June 29th, 2017 #25
Moroz
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Serbian View Post
Stalin’s Fight Against International Communism

Kerry Bolton

https://www.counter-currents.com/201...nal-communism/
Stalin did to the white race just like your faggot boy Hitler did , drag them into war and kill millions of whites. Still stuck mentally in WWII kid?
 
Old June 29th, 2017 #26
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,689
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moroz View Post
Stalin did to the white race just like your faggot boy Hitler did , drag them into war and kill millions of whites. Still stuck mentally in WWII kid?
Shut up and read this book you Trotsky loving MI6 faggot


Quote:
Stalin - The Enduring Legacy Hardcover





Stalin: The Enduring Legacy considers the 'Man of Steel' in a manner that will outrage dogmatists of both Left and Right. Stalinist Russia is reassessed as a state that transcended Marxism, and proceeded on a nationalist and imperial path rather than as the citadel of 'world revolution'. Stalin reversed many early Bolshevik policies re-instituting, for example, the traditional family. He abolished the Communist International, championed 'realism' in the arts and rejected post-1945 US plans for a 'new world order'. Despite so-called 'de-Stalinization' after his death, the Soviet bloc continued to oppose globalism, as does Putin's Russia. Stalin: The Enduring Legacy, examines the anti-Marxist character of Stalinism, the legitimacy of the Moscow Trials against the 'Old Bolsheviks', the origins of the Cold War, the development of Trotskyism as a tool of US foreign policy, the question of Stalin's murder, and the relevance of Russia to the future of world power politics. 'Dr. Bolton's book Stalin: The Enduring Legacy is a major contribution to the proper understanding of Russian, as well as American, politics and society in the twentieth century. It brushes aside the anti-Stalinist biases of the Trotskyist American chroniclers of this historical period to reveal the unquestionable integrity of Stalin as a nationalist leader. At the same time, it highlights the vital differences between the Russian national character rooted in the soil and history of Russia, and its opposite, the rootless Jewish cosmopolitanism that Trotskyist Marxism sought to impose on the Russians - as well as on the rest of the world'. - Dr Alexander Jacob
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/19...hesavdevarc-20
__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race


''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers
 
Old June 29th, 2017 #27
Fico
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 974
Default

Configuration for recognition that are Serbian members openly pro-communist. In poor state,whites love communism especially when better states in former Yugoslavia are in EU they can not use their money for saving poor states. Stalin is same as communist Yugoslav dictator ie. national-bolshevik. It is communism just in one nation with high taxation,centralized state when people can not have their own property and living in poverty. Because we are on western American site what can western said about it? Do you want state where you can not have modern goods,factories,real estates,living like a nigger tribes?
 
Old June 29th, 2017 #28
Emily Henderson
Intellijintly Dezined
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
Default

I am a long-time figure skating fan, and I remember watching the 1988 Games and my favorites were the Russian pairs skaters, Gordeeva and Grinkov. They were doing a montage on their life in Moscow, and my mom pointed out how clean and nice their subways were. She said, "You'd never see a subway like that in New York!" and asked if I knew why. I said, 'I don't know' and she said because it is a one race country, everyone there is Russian, and they have a Nationalistic mentality about cooperation and keeping their country decent.

I'm not pro Communist, but there are National Socialist aspects to the Soviet way of thinking, definitely--but they became corrupted over time, just like the US became a corrupted version of what our Founders had in mind.

I'm curious thoughts on Lenin--I feel like he was the one the global elite had a prob with, but I could be wrong. His death being a bit of a mystery, I feel like he may have been 'removed', as are so many.
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier
 
Old June 29th, 2017 #29
Fico
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 974
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Emily Henderson View Post
I said, 'I don't know' and she said because it is a one race country, everyone there is Russian, and they have a Nationalistic mentality about cooperation and keeping their country decent.
So why all better states who are in EU left communism and states who want to cooperate with Russia especially if we lok USSR Poland,Czech,Slovakia,Ukraine also do not want them? About communism cry just member of states who had been chief in communism including Serbia or Russia while small part of them who are anti-communist are minority or dead. White state? Well,White state can become nigger state without eugenics because dumb Whites act like a niggers and first who will become race-mixed are poor whites and who want to crush are better whites because as some person is better,it mean that he live in white society for example you will not see among rich upper class not in all better whites who are not part of them but they are still good productive white persons. I am going to you give another example,when my state left communism it was full of garbages because of that and when I visited USA I saw that I live in shit.

Last edited by Fico; June 29th, 2017 at 01:36 AM.
 
Old June 29th, 2017 #30
Emily Henderson
Intellijintly Dezined
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fico View Post
So why all better states who are in EU left communism and states who want to cooperate with Russia especially if we lok USSR Poland,Czech,Slovakia,Ukraine also do not want them? About communism cry just member of states who had been chief in communism including Serbia or Russia while small part of them who are anti-communist are minority or dead. White state?
I didn't quite understand the latter half of that, but I am speaking of late 1980s Russia, in comparison with late 1980s USA, which was becoming a cesspool of nigger violence. I'm not pro-Communist here, but see a need for anti-'gobble up the world' globalist capitalism that will stomp on authentic ethnic identity for $. And you have those idiots on the Left and the Right, both.

I know lots of Romanian youth died fighting Ceausescu, and am against that type of abuse of people, it's the same as abusive Capitalism when it's like that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fico View Post
Well,White state can become nigger state without eugenics because dumb Whites act like a niggers and first who will become race-mixed are poor whites and who want to crush are better whites because as some person is better,it mean that he live in white society for example you will not see among rich upper class not in all better whites who are not part of them but they are still good productive white persons.
But in actuality, part of why you see Whites who act like niggers (wiggers) is precisely because we are a mixed race, 'diverse' Nation, vs. a homogenized, Nationalism that is based on ethnicity society, as you see with Russians, Asians, and many in Eastern Europe, who are very ethno-centric in their thinking.
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier
 
Old June 29th, 2017 #31
Emily Henderson
Intellijintly Dezined
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
Default Re the EU

The EU is promoted as a human rights egalitarian friendly thingamajig, but it's globalism.
And if you remember Rwanda, the UN (same thing, supposed to be about 'human rights for all') didn't care about genocide, so long as there's no oil anyone wants.

Frans Timmermans (an EU minister), said that Europe 'cannot remain White' and it 'WILL BE diverse.'

Really, Frans? If race is a 'social construct', why do they care if it stays White or not? Why change it at all?

http://whitegenocideproject.com/eu-m...in-the-future/
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier
 
Old June 29th, 2017 #32
Fico
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 974
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Emily Henderson View Post

But in actuality, part of why you see Whites who act like niggers (wiggers) is precisely because we are a mixed race, 'diverse' Nation, vs. a homogenized, Nationalism that is based on ethnicity society, as you see with Russians, Asians, and many in Eastern Europe, who are very ethno-centric in their thinking.
I speak about wiggers in post-communist states. Eastern Europe,Assians Russians are still poor but Eastern Europans who are in EU are in develop because of capitalism. For example USA is not ethno-centric and she is good because race is only important not etnicity. Why is not nationalism successful? Because better Whites do not care about that,nationalists in fact poor people and this is reason why such states have strong nationalism but some states do not want to be nationalists more because they see that they do not want to live in state with some dumb people who is nationalist as they. For example rich white German will have marriage with rich white Polish woman. About global capitalism,capitalism with taxation of 60% is still socialism and civilization goes in downfall because 60% goes for all humans. Capitalism mean less taxation,less government,more money to people and less to the state.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Emily Henderson View Post
The EU is promoted as a human rights egalitarian friendly thingamajig, but it's globalism.
I know and this is not good because EU can be destroyed,closing borders,repeating of ww1 because many nationalist have interest for turn back some territories from other white nation who had been under their own nations what mean war among white people while in USA we can not see that. We have example Russia vs Ukraine and such examples we would have if Europans are not united. Nationalists in Europe are not pro-racial nationalists and this is all what you must know about them. USA members live in illusion they think if Eastern Europe is White it mean that all is good and that are they pro-white or if in Europe exist full of nationalists and they are basically White it mean that they are pro-white. Such nationalists can convert state into self-destructive state (because they do not have eugenical and capitalists program) through wiggers or through situation who we look in Brasil,Mexico where white nationalist cry after mongre nation lost in soccer.

Last edited by Fico; June 29th, 2017 at 02:12 AM.
 
Old June 29th, 2017 #33
GoldfingerSRB
Member
 
GoldfingerSRB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Srbija
Posts: 274
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moroz View Post
Stalin did to the white race just like your faggot boy Hitler did , drag them into war and kill millions of whites. Still stuck mentally in WWII kid?
Jewish monkey why are you insulting this place even by visiting the site? And why such garbage is allowed to get account here when everyone understands you're a Zionist? We know what you did with SF, here you have no chance kike.
 
Old June 29th, 2017 #34
GoldfingerSRB
Member
 
GoldfingerSRB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Srbija
Posts: 274
Default

Take a note, the RT due to reason of political correctness has to name Stalin a "dictator", although everyone in Russia understands he was not.

Quote:
Stalin appears on Christian icon



A small church near the Moscow Kremlin features an icon depicting Soviet dictator Josef Stalin. A similar image was at the center of a major scandal back in 2008.

The icon displayed in the St. Nicholas church shows the notorious tyrant talking to the St. Matrona Nikonova, reports Moskovsky Komsomolets newspaper. She is a saint of the Russian Orthodox Church, who lived in the first half of the 20th Century.

A popular urban legend claims that in autumn 1941, when Nazi German troops laid siege to Moscow, Stalin secretly visited the woman asking her for guidance. The saint allegedly convinced him that the city would not fall.

The icon of the St. Matrona shows several events from her life placed along the border of the image, and one is based on this legend, even though both historians and Church officials believe there is no truth behind it.

The journalists failed to find the origins of the controversial icon, but father Vladimir, a priest supervising Orthodox churches in central Moscow, said that apparently it was a gift, and that the painter was deceived by the legend.

In November 2008, a similar icon was put on display in a small church in St. Petersburg on the order of its prior. The move was condemned by clergy leaders and many public activists. In the wake of the scandal, the controversial icon was removed and the criticized priest renounced his position as head of the church.
 
Old June 29th, 2017 #35
Moroz
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Serbian View Post
Shut up and read this book you Trotsky loving MI6 faggot




https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/19...hesavdevarc-20
As I said your faggot boy Stalin like that Hitler guy did nothing for the white race , one failed miserably in war and led Europe to ruin while Stalin used labor of millions of white Russian to industrialize the USSR resulting in huge death toll while everything immediately collapsed after his death. Such achievement , heck they make Churchill look like fighter against zionism.
 
Old June 29th, 2017 #36
GoldfingerSRB
Member
 
GoldfingerSRB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Srbija
Posts: 274
Default

See how jews hate Hitler and Stalin both:

Quote:
The Devils' Alliance: Hitler's Pact with Stalin, 1939-1941 – review

Was Stalinism really worse than nazism? Richard J Evans takes issue with Roger Moorhouse's worryingly one-sided account of the consequences of the non-aggression pact



Seventy-five years ago, on 23 August 1939, Hitler's Germany and Stalin's Russia stunned the world by announcing that they had concluded a non-aggression pact, committing themselves not to aid each other's enemies or to engage in hostile acts against one another. Stalin knew the pact would not be popular. "For many years now," he said, "we have been pouring buckets of shit on each other's heads, and our propaganda boys could not do enough in that direction. And now, all of a sudden, are we to make our peoples believe that all is forgotten and forgiven? Things don't work that fast." Many western European communists, disgusted at this turn of events, left the party at this point in what was probably the largest exodus of members before the Soviet invasion of Hungary in 1956. The front garden of Nazi party headquarters in Munich was quickly filled with party badges and insignia thrown there by party members appalled at the thought of an alliance with the communist enemy they had spent their lives fighting against.
Sign up for the Bookmarks email
Read more

The shock would have been all the greater had people been aware of the secret clauses of the pact, with subsequent addenda, in which the two states agreed to partition Poland between them – Germany taking the larger part – while Hitler conceded that the independent Baltic states of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, Finland and parts of Romania would fall into the Soviet sphere of influence. Just over a week later, Hitler invaded Poland, his armies brushing aside the brave but ill-equipped Polish army, while shortly afterwards the Red Army marched into the eastern part of the country. In 1940, Stalin's troops marched into the Baltic states. His attack on Finland was initially repulsed in the "Winter War", but numbers told in the end, and an uneasy peace was reached, marked by Soviet annexations of Finnish territory in the east of the country. Further south, the Soviets seized Bessarabia and northern Bukovina from the Romanians.

These events are hardly "largely unknown", as Roger Moorhouse claims in his new book, nor are they "dismissed as a dubious anomaly" in the standard histories of the second world war. They were a crucial feature of the runup to the outbreak of the war, and they entered literature as part of George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four, where a sudden switch of alliances causes the hero Winston Smith to work overtime as he carries out the task assigned to him of rewriting the newspapers to make it look as if the new alliance had always been in existence.

And alliance indeed it was. For Hitler, the pact provided a guarantee that he could invade first Poland, then France and most of the rest of western Europe, without having to worry about any threat from the east. For Stalin, it allowed a breathing space in which to build up armed forces that had been severely damaged by the purges of the previous years, as his botched invasion of Finland showed. It also gave him the chance to expand the Soviet Union to include parts of the old Russian empire of pre-revolutionary times. Moorhouse is right, therefore, to insist that for Stalin the pact was not merely defensive, though he goes too far when he claims it was a golden opportunity for the Soviet leader "to set the world-historical forces" of revolution in motion. After a decade of "socialism in one country", he was not going to do that.

The pact eventually extended to the economic sphere, with Germany providing military equipment in exchange for raw materials such as oil, grain, iron and phosphates. Moorhouse sensibly discounts claims that these made a decisive economic difference to Germany or provided the Soviet Union with a crucial military advantage, though the statistics he quotes of German arms and equipment reaching Soviet factories are impressive, and Soviet deliveries of oil to the fuel-starved Germans were not without their effect. Shockingly, Stalin also handed back a substantial number of German communists who had taken refuge in the Soviet Union after the Nazi seizure of power; some of them, arrested during the purges, were taken directly from the Soviet Gulag to a German concentration camp.

Moorhouse tells a good story and, though it has been told before, notably in Anthony Read and David Fisher's The Deadly Embrace (1988), he is able to add interesting new details. His account of the negotiation and signing of the pact, finalised by Ribbentrop and Molotov, two men who had become foreign ministers of their respective countries through fawning sycophancy towards their respective leaders, is masterly.

Yet for all its virtues this is a deeply problematic book. Page after page is devoted to a detailed description of the horrors inflicted by Stalin and his minions on the territories the pact allowed him to occupy, with mass arrests and deportatations, shootings, torture and expropriation. The shooting of thousands of Polish army officers by the Soviet secret police in Katyn Forest and elsewhere has been well known for decades, like the brutal deportation of over a million Poles to Siberia and Central Asia, but much of the material provided by Moorhouse on the Baltic states is relatively new and makes sobering reading.

None of this, however, is balanced by any comparable treatment of the atrocities committed by the Nazis in Poland following their occupation of the western part of the country: the expropriation of Polish farms and businesses, the mass confiscation and looting of private property, the deportation of more than a million young Poles to work as slaves in Germany, the brutal displacement of Polish populations, the massacres of Poles carried out by the Germans, and the confinement of the majority of Poland's 3 million Jews in overcrowded, insanitary and deadly ghettoes in the major cities in the Nazi zone, where they were dying in large numbers within a few months.

If the pact allowed Stalin to visit his murderous policies on the Baltic states, it also permitted Hitler to do the same with the much larger and more heavily populated countries he invaded in western Europe at the same time, and even more so in the areas of southern Europe he conquered early in 1941. Yet the expropriation of Jews, the mass deportation of Alsatian Jews to camps in France, the massacres and atrocities committed by the Germans and their allies in Yugoslavia and the starvation of Greece receive barely a mention in this book, although they happened while the pact was still in force. The unbalanced treatment extends even to the period after the pact ended, in June 1941: Moorhouse devotes considerable attention to the Soviet attempt to cover up the Katyn massacre, but fails to mention the deliberate killing of Red Army troops taken prisoner by the Germans.

The book ends by praising the European Day of Remembrance for the Victims of Stalinism and Nazism, instituted by the EU in 2009 at the behest of the Baltic states, and held every year on 23 August, the anniversary of the signing of the pact. It is written very much in the spirit of the founding declaration of this "Black Ribbon Day", whose 19 points focus almost exclusively on Soviet atrocities while sparing barely a thought for Nazi ones. This goes even further than merely equating the two regimes, as the declaration purports to do. In both the book and the declaration, Stalinism comes out as being far worse than nazism.

This reflects the post-communist mood in the Baltic states, where SS veterans are hailed as "freedom fighters" against the Russians and are allowed to parade unhindered through the streets of Tallinn. In this view, the war fought by the western allies against Nazi Germany was a gigantic mistake; all it achieved was the enslavement of eastern Europe under the Soviet yoke. Yet, in the end, brutal and murderous though Stalinism was, Nazism visited even greater horrors on humanity with its policies of the genocidal elimination of the "inferior" and the "Jewish world enemy". The Nazi "General Plan for the East", conceived already in 1940, envisaged the extermination of 85% of the population of Estonia and 50% of the populations of Latvia and Lithuania. The Red Army might not have liberated these countries in 1945, but it certainly rescued them. Readers of this thoroughly biased and one-sided account of the Nazi-Soviet pact will have to look for these basic facts elsewhere.
 
Old June 29th, 2017 #37
Ironguard1940
Senior Member
 
Ironguard1940's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,613
Default A question that I think makes sense

Many of my father's family came from Russia, the Ukraine and Belarus. I am certain that I had some family members that died in the Holodomor, so forgive my bias. Also, if Stalin was so against the kikes as Hitler was, why didn't they put their ideological differences aside and fight the kikes and their allies TOGETHER?
 
Old June 29th, 2017 #38
Fico
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 974
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironguard1940 View Post
Many of my father's family came from Russia, the Ukraine and Belarus. I am certain that I had some family members that died in the Holodomor, so forgive my bias. Also, if Stalin was so against the kikes as Hitler was, why didn't they put their ideological differences aside and fight the kikes and their allies TOGETHER?
Or why Russian white army soliders fought for Hitler? You wast your time. Dr. Duke made many videos,many wn authors spoke about jewish origin of communism so Stalin was just their puppet but you can not explain this to people who have partisan ancestors and they now want that we recognize them as white soliders while such soliders fought against all white enemies.
 
Old June 29th, 2017 #39
Crowe
Senior Member
 
Crowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moroz View Post
As I said your faggot boy Stalin like that Hitler guy did nothing for the white race ,
Hitler was going to rid Europe of its jewish problem, and create a Germany for Germans, which is what real Nationalists around the world want for their own countries. Unlike you, another turd burglar from (((SF Russia))) who can't get enough of that MI6 cock.

Quote:
one failed miserably in war and led Europe to ruin
It was your Zionist buddies, Britain and the USA that led Europe to ruin. Here is something you need to get into your Zionist skull - Germany never wanted war. The (((West))), AKA your side wanted to destroy Germany just because they displayed a healthy Nationalism.

Quote:
while Stalin used labor of millions of white Russian to industrialize the USSR
Sounds like a great achievement to me.

Quote:
resulting in huge death toll
Because he purged some undesirables?

Quote:
while everything immediately collapsed after his death.
Actually, Stalin's influence and vision very much continued after his death, from what I understand.

Quote:
Such achievement , heck they make Churchill look like fighter against zionism.
Go back to (((SF Russia))). Where you can have your NATO, Zionist, and MI6 circle jerk.
__________________
Low-IQ bible scholars are legion, the big book o' bullshit is catnip to the underbrained. --ALEX LINDER
 
Old June 29th, 2017 #40
Fico
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 974
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowe View Post
Sounds like a great achievement to me.
This plan had mission for sold your house to state and state gave you "states house or flat" that you can not have more privat property where you work in firms for poor wages. It is great. Same was in Yugoslavia because they wanted destroy village and town. In town did not ever exist elite who had been changed by elite who collect money from high tax. Yugoslavia was under non-aligned also national-bolshevik and recieved niggers from such lands in towns who looked especially white blonde woman according to story from my grandma. Well mission is first give to whites poor wages and after that they can help through taxation state owned flats,houses until state do not become jungle when last of whites die. You guys hate real Russian anti-communist and blow propaganda from pro-communists who want Belgrade as center of communism in Yugoslavia as in past or Moscow as center of communism in USSR while Hitler stop them and without Hitler probably western Europe would become communist. Instead of say thanks to progeny of anti-communist ancestors you attack them while communists would done same as today doing cultural marxist in USA,mongrelized and destroy the White race who are better class than blacks. It is like a American Wn for example,yes I am not for kikes but I support Christianity or I am not for kikes but I support Communism. We have on this topic comparsion of theist jewish god jesus and atheist jewish god Stalin who did not come from the sky than who established heaven on Earth lol.

Last edited by Fico; June 29th, 2017 at 01:23 PM.
 
Reply

Tags
putin pro-normal, russia, russian nationalism, stalin, ussr

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:30 AM.
Page generated in 0.70059 seconds.