|
|
|
Thread | Display Modes | Share |
July 26th, 2012 | #21 |
Administrator
|
|
August 1st, 2012 | #22 |
Administrator
|
holocaust
[from David Irving] A fast ride out to the big house afterwards, arriving at 8:30 pm. I persuade Jae to help me watch Hitchcock's North by Northwest, (above), one of my favourite films of all time, made back in 1959 -- fifty years ago in fact. A shocking thought. She does not even know who Cary Grant was. I must have seen it half a dozen times in the sixties but being very innocent I had not until now appreciated Eva Marie Saint's sexual allusions, nor the nudging hint of the train penetrating the railroad tunnel as the film fades out. One detail causes me to pause the film and rewind: yes, there it is. After the famous scene of the sinister cropduster biplane smashing into the oil tanker on the lonely, arrow-straight prairie highway somewhere near Bakersfield, Cary Grant confronts Eve Kendall and there is a glimpse of her local newspaper on a table: TWO DIE AS CROP DUSTER PLANE CRASHES AND BURNS, reads the headline: TRUCK DRIVER ESCAPES HOLOCAUST. Do my eyes deceive me? I rewind a few seconds. Yes, there it is: HOLOCAUST. Unthinkable now, of course. But this movie was made in 1959, ten years or more before those nice folks hijacked the H.-word for their own global purposes to promote their Holocaust (a vengeful episode, one might well anticipate, doomed to be repeated, with all the inevitability of Greek tragedy); and a movie made for that matter before the homosexuals had begun most improbably claiming to be GAY -- a word which James Mason uses here in its proper meaning. How do these things happen? Well, when I interviewed Heinrich Himmler's brother Gebhard in 1971 the H.-word was still not used: as witness my transcript of that conversation. But I recall my editor on Hitler's War, Stan Hochman, one of the finest outside editors I ever met, refusing in 1975 to let me describe the Hamburg firestorm raids as a "holocaust," explaining that The Viking Press house-style book would not permit it; I subsequently found that this embargo reflected a common ruling up and down Madison Avenue -- the H.-word was by now (mid 1970s) reserved exclusively for Jewish use. I guess some smart New York public-relations firm told them that if they really wanted to make big bucks they had to market their tragedy the same as any other industrial product: the brand name, the capital letter, the emphasis on the uniqueness of the product, a six-million dollar slogan, and all the rest. http://www.fpp.co.uk//docs/Irving/Ra...09/280309.html |
August 1st, 2012 | #23 |
Administrator
|
controversial: opposed to the jewish agenda or any item on it. If jew Jeff Bezos, head of amazon.com gives millions to support ''gay' marriage,' he's a great corporate citizen participating in the democratic process; if christian Dan Cathy, head of Chick-Fil-A, comes out against balloon-knot tying, he's a controversial figure who should keep his mouth shut and stay out of politics.
|
August 1st, 2012 | #24 |
Perception Manager
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,794
|
Civil Rights
This one is so commonly used that it's really hard to pry your mind away from the politically correct meaning. They speak of the "civil rights" movement in the newspapers, but what's the background? What it really means is that property rights are violated. You must, under punishment of law, do business with someone you don't want to. Remember the stories of "freedom riders"? They were going into restaurants and demanding service, despite being unwelcome. Those were pre-PC days, and when the restaurant said "no", in some cases the "freedom riders" were arrested for trespassing. Today, "civil rights laws" are rarely seen as "weakened trespassing laws", but that's the true meaning. If someone is in your business establishment, and you don't want them there, guess what? They get to stay under "civil rights" laws, and not thrown out as a trespasser. Similarly, under "Civil Rights" housing laws, that too is a bastardization of the English language. The ZOG has censored your right to advertize your wish to sell to Whites only, again under punishment of law. So, it's not "Civil Rights" at all, but really censorship, and restriction on property owners to do business with whom they choose. A substitute for this one should be something like, "Pro-trespassing Laws" or "Anti-property rights laws" not "Civil Rights". I'm curious to hear a Vanguard substitute term for "Civil Rights" if anyone can think of a better one.
__________________
|
August 15th, 2012 | #25 |
Perception Manager
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,794
|
Gay
This is another one that has so much common usage, it requires a bit of effort to get away from this PC term. The accurate term is "homosexual". I've seen billboards from the republican camp that say, "Obama is pro gay marriage. Stop his attack on our morals". Why use the PC word "gay" when the whole point is to condemn this aberrant behavior? "Gay" is wrong to use because it originally meant "happy". Getting sexually aroused by the smell of a hairy man's anus has nothing to do with happiness, so the hijacking of this word is particularly egregious. Also, it used to be a woman's name. Ever heard of "Enola Gay"? The bomber that dropped the big on on Hiroshima was named after a woman by that name. Like, "Mary Ann" or "Betty Lou". Since the homosexuals have hijacked this word, no one would even think about naming their daughter "Gay" today. Anyway, to be unencumbered by PC propaganda terminology, "Gay marriage" should be"homosexual 'marriage'", thereby bringing into question the concept. "Gay rights groups" should be "homosexual pressure groups". There's an entire set of assumptions built into using one small word. If those assumptions aren't yours, don't use it.
__________________
|
August 25th, 2012 | #26 |
Administrator
|
regional tax base sharing - attempt to draw white taxes to black areas, similar to what has been done with school funding in certain areas
regional equity - anti-White tax discrimination or theft. smart growth - Implies that if you don't want to be part of a niggerized, socialist inner city, and act on this belief by moving away from it, you are dumb, and should be forced back into the city through whatever regulations can be passed to increase your taxes, or make it harder to build houses or own vehicles. [discussed in this article] http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?p...05#post1428805 Last edited by Alex Linder; August 25th, 2012 at 08:14 PM. |
August 28th, 2012 | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,236
|
The New Superstition...
One of the more overt forms of Western de-evolving rational is the use of the phrase "wrong time and the wrong place" to describe a tragedy which has befallen an individual or group. It's hardly a use of deductive reasoning is it? Deductive reasoning being a traditional line of thought which generally retraces a course of events to ascertain their genesis (or cause). If an airplane crashes we don't say the passengers were merely in the wrong place at the wrong time. No, we investigate and determine the cause, be it mechanical malfunction or weather related. Another such phrase is "random act of violence". Is there really such a thing? At the most extreme example of excuse, if someone is mentally disturbed and commits an egregious act, that act's genesis (or cause) can thus be traced to that person's mental state. There is always a cause. Even lightning strikes can be understood and explained. Yet today, due to the harmful ideologies of political correctness, equality and diversity, certain crimes must needs be attributed to almost supernatural influences which defy explanation, let alone investigation. In other words, to describe a crime as "random" is the same as saying elves did it. http://signalsfromthebrink.blogspot....erstition.html
__________________
Experience molds perception. |
August 28th, 2012 | #28 |
Perception Manager
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,794
|
tolerance
Originally stated by deadmanwalking: deadmanwalking on http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2...s-missing.html I find it strange how people are so proud of their "tolerance" and say we should all "tolerate" each other. I tolerate things I hate, like bad food, pain, and obnoxious music. So if we tolerate each other it really means we can't stand each other. This just proves multiculturalism does not work. We end up with a country where we can't talk to our neighbors about real issues, we just bite our tongue and tolerate them. If they found out we were left or right, or Christians or Jews or Muslims they would think we were rednecks, or bigots, or Zionists, or "pigs and monkeys" (if you read the Koran), or whatever. These are the names people call each other on the web, and it is what we really think of each other, so admit it, and stop pretending we can all get along as countrymen, because we do not have unity of spirit of real countrymen, we have "tolerance" which is really intolerance that we hide under the surface in public. We have to maintain a false exterior, but sooner or later the facade will crack. Maybe it just has.
__________________
|
August 28th, 2012 | #29 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 73
|
Big Al: "...youths, children, teenagers, kids - euphemisms for younger niggers..."
Another yuff (yuff = euphemism) for niggers is disadvantaged, one I never tire of chuckling over. As in: "After they raped and murdered the disabled white woman, several of the disadvantaged fled down a back alley, stabbing a homeless blind man along the way..." |
August 28th, 2012 | #30 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
|
Diversity - usually used in situations where the intention is to bring different races together and mix them to the point that all actual diversity is eliminated in a mongrelized brown sludge.
|
August 28th, 2012 | #31 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,803
|
"Gone Wrong" and "Botched"
Whenever a nigger commits a crime against a White and then murders the White for no other reason than sheer race hatred of Whites it is called a "crime gone wrong" or a "botched crime" The typical framing of this is a "robbery gone wrong" or a "burglary gone wrong" or a "botched home invasion" or a "botched car hijacking." The true driving motivation of the crime in question was to murder a White out of race hatred, everything else is TNB and secondary. You will never see a White man rob a nigger woman and then murder her. One, because it is so much more rare than the opposite of a predator nigger preying on a White woman and two because NOTHING would ever be reported as accidental or unintentioned, i.e., "gone wrong" or "botched" if a White man robbed a nigger woman of pocket change and then murdered her. This is just as bad as "youth" being the new nigger. "Gone wrong" and "botched" are the new euphemisms for NIGGERS MURDERING WHITES. Edit: This one is all over the news now, a "botched robbery" in St. Louis, Missouri. Notice the nigger killers described as 18 and "teens" and "youth" to make the race hatred slaughter seem less than what it is. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...rs-murder.html Quote:
Quote:
|
||
September 2nd, 2012 | #32 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
"Robbery gone wrong?" Try murder gone right. Did the nigger have to kill the human? No. It could have just as easily 'botched' the robbery by running away. Always the jews try to turn the nigger's malevolent violence into a neutral necessity. "Robbery gone wrong" might fit if you had a burglary planned where no one was supposed to be home, but someone was, and pulled a gun on the would-be burglars, forcing them to shoot. But it certainly does not apply to some unarmed woman in a car. The people running the media are genocial liars. |
|
September 2nd, 2012 | #34 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 488
|
The use of "Foreigner" is now Politically Incorrect.
The next word to be flushed down the memory hole, as opposed to being merely altered or used euphemistically is `foreigner'. The jewish opinion forming apparatus has demanded that the contemporary lexicon eradicate the use of the word from the vocabularies of all correct-thinking semite conformity-obsessed zealots. It is the contention of the mind manipulators that if all featherless bipeds are equal and that national boundaries and concepts of racial and national citizenship are artifical constructs impeding multiracialism,`diversity' and non-white entitlement to reside in formerly all White nation states, then the word `foreigner' has a negative connotation denigrating the `other' and must be discontinued; however, in non-Western and non-white states the word `foreigner' may still be used to denote Whites as the `other' precisely because of the reinforcing and denigrating power of the word.
|
September 15th, 2012 | #36 |
Perception Manager
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,794
|
Regime
When the ZOG decides to overthrow a government, the kikenmedia immediately begins to call that government a "regime". So, the following terminology should sound natural to you if you read the kikemedia: Syrian regime Iranian regime Saddam Hussein's regime In other words, you've been conditioned to accept the kikenmedia terminology, quite possibly inadvertently. Now, by comparison, get a sense of the non-natural sound of the following: British regime French regime Canadian regime So, for example you'll never read a sentence like this, "Today the Canadian regime conducted joint maneuvers with the United States regime forces." The ZOG just doesn't talk that way about its allies and itself. This word-usage-shift is part of the kikenmedia technique to question the legitimacy of the governments it wishes to overthrow. One day its just plain "Syria" the next they put out a memo to their kikenmedia propagandists and they start to call it the "Syrian regime". It draws a distinction between the government and the people that wasn't suggested before. Then the ZOG gets its mouth-pieces to say words to the effect, "We love the people, but we hate the regime."
__________________
|
January 28th, 2013 | #37 | |
Perception Manager
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,794
|
Cultural Marxism
Quote:
__________________
|
|
January 30th, 2013 | #38 |
Perception Manager
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,794
|
Niggers:
Junkmedia code words... "Young People" "Young Teens" "Youths" "Urban Youth" All = Niggers
__________________
|
February 1st, 2013 | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,803
|
I am not sure if it has been said here, but whenever something is being funded by Jews, pushed by them and then voted on by them, it is always "comprehensive."
For instance, jews want amnesty, chain migration/chain amnesty, citizenship through military service from non-citizens, no border wall, no e-verify, illegals getting local, state and federal services, the continuation of "legal immigration" and the ramping of it instead of a moratorium, driver's licenses for illegals, the continuation of allowing illegals into U.S. schools, illegals getting "scholarships" to U.S. colleges, etc. If a bill had all that and a cherry on top, the judenpresse and the judenkongresse would call it... "A comprehensive immigration reform bill." While we are it... "Reform" "Reform" always means "Change that benefits the jews." For instance, "comprehensive immigration reform" that would stop work visas, refugee resettlement and all that, essentially ceasing all legalized immigration for 10 years. The bill would then give full authorization of the creation of an Israel-style electrified razor wire and teflon coated steel and concrete wall followed up with deportations and enforcement of financial and criminal penalties for dealing with illegals while creating new laws that penalize that behavior and make the current ones stronger would seem to be fairly comprehensive. That would never be called "comprehensive reform." Last edited by Hunter Morrow; February 1st, 2013 at 03:25 PM. |
August 18th, 2013 | #40 |
...
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 9,744
|
An oxymoron:
"A non-practicing jew" - Implies that jews are simply a religion and that they can just stop being jews at will. Last edited by varg; August 18th, 2013 at 08:20 PM. Reason: . |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|