Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old December 2nd, 2003 #1
Randolph
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Case Against the Fed

http://www.mises.org/store/product1....&Product_ID=69

"The most powerful case against the American central bank ever written. This work begins with a mini-treatment of money and banking theory, and then plunges right in with the real history of the Federal Reserve System. Rothbard covers the struggle between competing elites and how they converged with the Fed.
Rothbard calls for the abolition of the central bank and a restoration of the gold standard. His popular treatment incorporates the best and most up-to-date scholarship on the Fed's origins and effects."


This is a must read to learn about money and banking. This book will show you how the Federal Government, Federal Reserve, and the bankers themselves have been robbing all of us.

Look for my post on "Ford's $5.00 a Day"
 
Old December 3rd, 2003 #2
no_nomen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Randolph,

The John Birch Society has been pushing that same tired old line
for a damn long time. A lot of us have "been there -done that".

www.jbs.org/
 
Old December 3rd, 2003 #3
The Final Solution
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randolph
www.mises.org

"The most powerful case against the American central bank ever written. This work begins with a mini-treatment of money and banking theory, and then plunges right in with the real history of the Federal Reserve System. Rothbard covers the struggle between competing elites and how they converged with the Fed. Rothbard calls for the abolition of the central bank and a restoration of the gold standard.
Mises, Rothbard, Ayn Rand (Anna Rosenbaum), Milton Friedman and most of the rest of the libbertoons have been kikes. The radical individualism they advocated is just as incompatible with White values as the other grand kike yideology--bolshevism. In practice, so-called libertarianism is just a smokescreen for kike swindling. Witness deregulation as in kike Fastow's Enron.

There is certainly a good case against Paul Warburg's Fed usury temple--just don't get it from another kike. As the Protocols show, they take all sides of all issues just to confuse the gullible goyim. And always to serve kike interests. Never yours, White man.
 
Old December 3rd, 2003 #4
no_nomen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Final Solution
The radical individualism they advocated is
just as incompatible with White values as the other grand kike yideology--
bolshevism. In practice, so-called libertarianism is just a smokescreen for kike
swindling. --- As the Protocols show, they take all sides of all issues just to confuse the gullible goyim. And always to serve kike interests. Never yours, White man.
TFS,

Yes indeed. And the protocols also state that the Jews want a return
to the "gold standard". It makes sence: Just ask "who has the gold?".

GoldBugs = GoldBergs

Old YHVH's Desert Bandits Gold and Silver Con Game!


.
 
Old December 3rd, 2003 #5
no_nomen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Questions for Randolph

no_nomen asks:

Since you are so well versed in the Federal Reserve
and the "money issue" it would be only logical to
assume that you know full well that there is little
to no gold owned by the U.S. ;'>)))



Randolph writes:

I would like to find out the truth of the matter.
I will post that question to a forum of economists
that I am a member of and will get the anwer.



no_nomen writes:

OK: I shall get right to the point.

Ask your 'economists' exactly when the US gold
reserve has been audited!

Be sure and let us know their answer!

Please provide us with a refrence to a US Government
document showing the results and date of the gold audit.
Several different years of audits would really be most
helpful.

If the US Gov. has a reserve of gold surely they do an
audit at least yearly. Gold is too valuable for the US Gov.
not to keep very good records of their holdings!


RIGHT ???


.
 
Old December 4th, 2003 #6
Randolph
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Final Solution
Mises, Rothbard, Ayn Rand (Anna Rosenbaum), Milton Friedman and most of the rest of the libbertoons have been kikes. The radical individualism they advocated is just as incompatible with White values as the other grand kike yideology--bolshevism. In practice, so-called libertarianism is just a smokescreen for kike swindling. Witness deregulation as in kike Fastow's Enron.

There is certainly a good case against Paul Warburg's Fed usury temple--just don't get it from another kike. As the Protocols show, they take all sides of all issues just to confuse the gullible goyim. And always to serve kike interests. Never yours, White man.

I am fully aware that these individuals have jewish backgrounds. That is besides the point. Suppose the law of supply and demand was formulated by a jew? Does that invalidate the fact that if a supply of a good decreases (demand stays the same), prices will tend to rise? No it does not.

It just so happens that Mises' and Rothbard's econimic treatises are the only ones from the last 50 years. For someone who wants to learn economic, there is no other choice. Until a white man publishes something of value, I will use these sources.

Besides, Austrian Economics is now being taught world-wide as the only real economic science that is value free. It is fully compatible with the 14 words. That, my friend is my formost goal. This goal even supercedes all other ideology, even national socialism.

The economics of the white man is free trade, freedom to transact with whomever his wishes to. Free trade also means that the white man can refuse to transact with niggers, jews, or anyone not to his liking.

Free trade also means having full private property rights. This means that a white community, with no public property, can ban all non-whites from the community. If all property is privately owned by white people, how will the nigger be able to travel within? The only way will be for the nigger to have prior approval from all property owners whose property he will pass through.

You look foward towards a race war that will end up in destruction in much of our structure of production. This will lead to a decrease in the standard of living.

There is a better method available. By focusing on private property rights and getting government out of all our affairs, except for the protection of life and property, we can achieve our goals.

Besides, we will still need the spicks and niggers to do those jobs that we would not do ourselves. Have any of you thought of that?
 
Old December 4th, 2003 #7
Randolph
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/i...82/ifdp582.pdf

Here is a non-technical report from the Fed.

The US has about 265 million troy gold oz.

Total gold held by governments of the world is only 19% of the world's known supply of gold.

The report was issued 1997.
 
Old December 5th, 2003 #8
no_nomen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default more than the Jew Bankers could stand!

.

I wonder why Randolph, the libertarian white supremicist
economist doesn't know about this?


I suppose the public fool system is to blame.

The real cause of America's war for independence
was the same as the reason for WW2.

The Colonies issued Colonial Script and the National Socialists
issued Riechmarks: Neither backed by gold and/or silver.

And both were so beneficial to both economies that
everyday Folk prospered wildly!


That was more than the Jew Bankers could stand!
_________________
THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION (1764 - 1781)

By the mid 1700's Britain was at its height of power, but was also heavily in debt.

Since the creation of the Bank of England, they had suffered four costly wars and the total debt now stood at £140,000,000, (which in those days was a lot of money).

In order to make their interest payments to the bank, the British government set about a programme to try to raise revenues from their American colonies, largely through an extensive programme of taxation.

There was a shortage of material for minting coins in the colonies, so they began to print their own paper money, which they called Colonial Script. This provided a very successful means of exchange and also gave the colonies a sense of identity. Colonial Script was money provided to help the exchange of goods. It was debt free paper money not backed by gold or silver.

During a visit to Britain in 1763, The Bank of England asked Benjamin Franklin how he would account for the new found prosperity in the colonies. Franklin replied.

"That is simple. In the colonies we issue our own money. It is called Colonial Script. We issue it in proper proportion to the demands of trade and industry to make the products pass easily from the producers to the consumers.

In this manner, creating for ourselves our own paper money, we control its purchasing power, and we have no interest to pay to no one."
Benjamin Franklin 1

America had learned that the people's confidence in the currency was all they needed, and they could be free of borrowing debts. That would mean being free of the Bank of England.

In Response the world's most powerful independent bank used its influence on the British parliament to press for the passing of the Currency Act of 1764.

This act made it illegal for the colonies to print their own money, and forced them to pay all future taxes to Britain in silver or gold.

Here is what Franklin said after that.

"In one year, the conditions were so reversed that the era of prosperity ended, and a depression set in, to such an extent that the streets of the Colonies were filled with unemployed."
Benjamin Franklin

"The colonies would gladly have borne the little tax on tea and other matters had it not been that England took away from the colonies their money, which created unemployment and dissatisfaction. The inability of the colonists to get power to issue their own money permanently out of the hands of George III and the international bankers was the PRIME reason for the Revolutionary War."
Benjamin Franklin's autobiography

By the time the war began on 19th April 1775 much of the gold and silver had been taken by British taxation. They were left with no other choice but to print money to finance the war.

What is interesting here is that Colonial Script was actually working so well, it became a threat to the established economic system of the time.

The idea of issuing money as Franklin put it "in proper proportion to the demands of trade and industry" and not charging any interest, was not causing any problems or inflation. This unfortunately was alien to the Bank of England which only issued money for the sake of making a profit for its shareholder's.


1. Congressman Charles G. Binderup of Nebraska, Unrobing the Ghosts of Wall Street
.
 
Old December 12th, 2003 #9
The Final Solution
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randolph
It just so happens that Mises' and Rothbard's econimic treatises are the only ones from the last 50 years. For someone who wants to learn economic, there is no other choice. Until a white man publishes something of value, I will use these sources.
Check out the references on economics in WG Simpson's Which Way Western Man. All White, all anti-cross of kike gold.

Quote:
The economics of the white man is free trade, freedom to transact with whomever his wishes to. Free trade also means that the white man can refuse to transact with niggers, jews, or anyone not to his liking
But the great White industrialists, even Henry Ford, used the economic "freedom" you and the kike libbertoons advocate to transact business with (employ) niggers at the expense of their fellow Whites. And "free trade" now means outsourcing of White IT jobs to dots and slopes. What is good for the individual or corporation is not always good for the collective--in our case, the White Race.

Quote:
You look foward towards a race war that will end up in destruction in much of our structure of production. This will lead to a decrease in the standard of living.
The 14 words say nothing about an individual's standard of living. While I might individually enjoy a new plasma TV made by cheap gook labor, that in and of itself does nothing for my Race. The experience of National Socialism suggests that a Racially-based economic system will provide an adequate standard of living for all Whites. But that is not itz supreme goal. Racial survival is.

Quote:
Besides, we will still need the spicks and niggers to do those jobs that we would not do ourselves. Have any of you thought of that?
I sure have. The jewification of our People must be reversed. The media's glorification of the usurers and swindlers must end. The value of all labor, including manual labor, must be reestablished. There is little I personally would not do to be free of niggers and spics.
 
Old December 12th, 2003 #10
no_nomen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DozerAgain
the only thing you must know is the race of the speaker.
You can judge the truth of their statements solely by that.
What more do you need to know?
Conversley, on the Web, you can know the Race

(Jew Wanna-Bees included) of a poster

by the Truth or Falsity of their statments.




If it Quacks like a Kike...

Do you really think it's a Song Bird?



.
 
Old December 17th, 2003 #11
Randolph
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by no_nomen
Conversley, on the Web, you can know the Race

(Jew Wanna-Bees included) of a poster

by the Truth or Falsity of their statments.




If it Quacks like a Kike...

Do you really think it's a Song Bird?



.

What you are refering to is polylogism, the theory that different races have different brain structures, thus the jew thinks one way and the white the other way, and the negro still another way.

That is just plain silly. The jew may have one set of goals, the white another and the negro a third. But the means to attain these goals is all the same. Man acts.

Treason or no treason, Linder is confusing ends and means, and that is why he and others are confused and accept a concept such as polylogism.

And if you and Linder were consistant you will see that socialism, especially national socialism, was a jewish invention. Nazis never did come up with anything new, it was all borrowed from other sources, especially from Lady Rosenburg of the early 1800s.
 
Old December 17th, 2003 #12
Randolph
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

[Qoute][B]There was still the main obstacle to overcome: the devastating criticism of the economists. Marx had a solution at hand. Human reason, he asserted, is constitutionally unfitted to find truth. The logical structure of mind is different with various social classes. There is no such thing as a universally valid logic. What mind produces can never be anything but "ideology," that is, in the Marxian terminology, a set of ideas disguising the selfish interests of the thinker's own social class. Hence, the "bourgeois" mind of the economists is utterly incapable of producing more than an apology for capitalism. The teachings of "bourgeois" science, an offshoot of "bourgeois" logic, are of no avail for the proletarians, the rising class destined to abolish all classes and to convert the earth into a Garden of Eden.

But, of course, the logic of the proletarians is not merely a class logic. "The ideas of proletarian logic are not party ideas, but emanations of logic pure and simple." [2] Moreover, by virtue of a special privilege, the logic of certain elect bourgeois is not tainted with the original sin of being bourgeois. Karl Marx, the son of a well-to-do lawyer, married to the daughter of a Prussian noble, and his collaborator Frederick Engels, a wealthy textile manufacturer, never doubted that they themselves were above the law and, notwithstanding their bourgeois background, were endowed with the power to discover absolute truth. [p. 75] [Quote]

Logic is logic.
 
Old December 17th, 2003 #13
The Final Solution
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randolph
the jew thinks one way and the white the other way, and the negro still another way. That is just plain silly.
No itz just plain true. Except the part about the nigger. The nigger savage doesn't think at all. But the gook does not think like the White man; see WLP's Hunter. And nobody thinks like the cunning kike. Carl Jung, who had his share of unfortunate exposure to the kike, concluded over many decades ago that there was an Aryan psychology and a kike psychology, and never the twain shall meet. I have dealt with both kikes and slopes, and they each have distinctive thought processes as well as characteristic behaviors.
 
Old December 18th, 2003 #14
no_nomen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Final Solution
... nobody thinks like the cunning kike. Carl Jung,
who had his share of unfortunate exposure to the
kike, concluded over many decades ago that there
was an Aryan psychology and a kike psychology,
and never the twain shall meet. I have dealt with
both kikes and slopes, and they each have distinctive
thought processes as well as characteristic behaviors.

I wonder if anyone can explain why Randolph persists in promoting
the Kike (Jewish) "Austrian Economics"? He has stated on this forum
that he knows they are Jews (Kikes). Now why does he do that?

The word "polylogism" appears in no English Dictionary I can access,
but it does show up in one place only: The various (Jew/Kike) "Austrian
Economics" Promoter's sites on the web. There are several Yidish and
Jewish Dictionaries I have yet to check though.
See below:

http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=80
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Final Solution
Mises, Rothbard, Ayn Rand (Anna Rosenbaum), Milton Friedman
and most of the rest of the libbertoons have been kikes. The
radical individualism they advocated is just as incompatible
with White values as the other grand kike yideology--bolshevism.

Ludwig von Mises ...Murray N. Rothbard
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randolph
I am fully aware that these individuals have jewish backgrounds.
What a "polite" way to say: "They Are Jews"



polylogism

Merriam Webster's Dictionary
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary
http://www.m-w.com/home.htm
The word you've entered isn't in the dictionary.

OneLook Dictionary Search - (Search 870 dictionaries at once.)
http://www.onelook.com/
Search all dictionaries: Sorry, no dictionaries indexed in the
selected category contain the word polylogism:.

http://www.yourdictionary.com/
Sorry, no words matching "polylogism" were found

Search 1911encyclopedia.org
http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/
Your search - polylogism - did not match any documents.

http://whatis.techtarget.com/wsearch...ery=polylogism

Chapter III. Economics and the Revolt Against Reason: Racial ...
Economics and the Revolt Against Reason 4. Racial Polylogism Marxian
polylogism is an abortive makeshift to salvage the untenable doctrines
of socialism. ...
http://www.mises.org/humanaction/chap3sec4.asp

Last edited by no_nomen; December 18th, 2003 at 06:13 AM.
 
Old December 18th, 2003 #15
The Final Solution
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by no_nomen
I wonder if anyone can explain why Randolph persists in promoting the Kike (Jewish) "Austrian Economics"? He has stated on this forum that he knows they are Jews (Kikes). Now why does he do that?
As Prof. MacDonald demonstrates, all the kike yideologies are quite successful in corrupting gentiles to act as their front men. Here are some of my examples:

judeo-communism--inventors: Marx, Lenin, Trotsky; butt goyim: Stalin, Molotov

neokahnservatism--inventors: Podwhoretz, Kristall; butt goyim Cheney, Rumsfeld, Will

"Cultural" Anthropology--inventors: Boas, Klineberg; butt goyim: Mead, Benedict

zionism--inventors: Herzl, Jabotinsky; butt goyim: Truman, Robertson, Falwell

Psychoanalysis--inventor: Freud; butt goy: Jones

HOLOHOAX lies-- inventors: Wiesel, Wiesenthal; butt goy: Evans

judeo-feminism--inventor:Freidan; butt goyim: spermfront dykes

kosher Racialism--inventors: Auster, Schiller; butt goyim: JARED, Yggdrasil

libbertoonism--inventors: Rand(Rosenbaum), Mises; butt goyim: Rand(olph), Lewpus

See, Rand(olph), the would be "WN leader," is not even oringinal.

Last edited by The Final Solution; December 18th, 2003 at 02:01 PM.
 
Old December 18th, 2003 #16
no_nomen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

.

Perhaps Randolph, our Resident Economist, can explain to our Forum Members just exactly how Money is Loaned to the U.S. by a Privately Owned Corporation, known as The Federal Reserve.

And how the Federal Reserve is no more Federal than Federal Express Corporation or McDonalds Corporation.

And how much does it cost the Privately Owned Federal Reserve Corporation to print a $100 Bill? A$1,000 Bill?

What does Privately Owned Federal Reserve Corporation charge the U.S. for the $100 Bill? The $1,000 Bill?

What is the Profit Margin for each of the above sales?

And just who owns the Stock of the Federal Reserve Corporation?

And why can't You or I by Stock in such a Profitable Corporation?

.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:50 AM.
Page generated in 0.21438 seconds.