|
July 22nd, 2008 | #781 | |||||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||||||
July 22nd, 2008 | #782 | |||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
July 22nd, 2008 | #783 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Have you noticed how hysterical Roberta gets when I challenge her and her fellow funnyboy freaks over at holocaust controversies to MATCH nafcash's reward?
Notice I said MATCH. Why is HC (Hysterical Cowardly Homosexual Creeps espousing Holocaust Claptrap and Historical Canards) afraid to accept nafcash's challenge? Is it because the worlds 15 million jews - the world’s richest people - are just a little short at the moment? Or is it that they are so afraid of the truth that they lack the character to put their money where their mealy mouths are? If 21 nonjews in one little non-profit, 501 (c) (3) (exempt), Scientific / Historical Educational Association can offer $100,000.00, (backed by legally binding contracts) to someone who proves the provable, then why won't the cowards at HC match nafcash's amount? The fact that they won't even try is proof positive that they are a bunch of cowardly frauds who are nothing but holocaust industry shills trying to protect the fraudulent hoax that the "huge mass graves" of the "pure extermination centers" have been located by archeologists. Here it is folks, the easiest hundred grand you will ever earn: Now Roberta, after all that claptrap that you just posted in #777, you forgot to show us: Just one "huge mass grave" that contains just one percent of the alleged mass murder at Treblinka. Just one body in a "wax-fat transformation" at Belzec. Just one pound of crushed bone at Chelmno. (How about just one single tooth?) Just one ounce of human ash at Sobibor. Just one gassed jew from the entire "holocaust." What are you waiting for Roberta? Are you some kind of coward, or what? |
July 22nd, 2008 | #784 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Roberta:
"I have a strong sexual attraction towards the love of my life - Elton John. The only other person I'd like to have sex with more is Brad Pitt. Actually I would like to do both of them, but as John is a homosexual whereas Pitt keeps making Angelina pregnant and thus wouldn't have sex with me, Elton John is a realistic fantasy for me." OK Roberta, that's more information than we need or want to know. Now, if you could get your mind off of Brutus's balls and Pitt's dick and John’s anus, could we talk about your refusal to accept nafcash's challenge? Just think Roberta, if each jew in the world donated just one dollar each to your reward fund? Do you think there is a single jew on the planet that doesn't have at least one dollar to send to your reward fund? Do you think that there is one jew in the world who wouldn't pay one single dollar to help stop holocaust denial? Just one greasy jew. Just one single dollar. 15 million times over. Not only can it be done, it could be done so easily. Andjew Mathias could set up the escrow account. It would be held in a U.S. bank. Let's use Goldman Sachs, shall we? Hell Roberta, I would like to be the first one to donate to this worthy cause. Have that greasy piece of shit Mathias get a hold of me asap when this fund is established -OK? Nafcash will help you promote it. What are you greasy faggots waiting for Roberta? Are you all a bunch of cowardly frauds, or what? |
July 22nd, 2008 | #785 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Roberta:
No problem. Any amount of the physical remains you mention that corresponds to the known mass murder and body disposal at each of these camps becomes apparent from the evidence mentioned hereafter... V. Auschwitz-Birkenau (re the "one gassed Jew" thing)... Eyewitness, documentary and physical evidence mentioned in the Veritas Team Opening Statement on the RODOH forum under... Documentation of physical evidence includes photographs of gassing victims being incinerated in open air pits... I'm sorry Roberta, I can't find the name of even one of the alleged "gassing victims" you say you proved was gassed. Can you give us the name of just one of these "gassed" jews? Just one Roberta. One. Try as I might Roberta, it's just not "becoming apparent" to me who this "gassing victims" name is. This is sort of like the Soviets claim that, after spending 5 days investigating Treblinka, and finding not a single body or single grave (and even proving that the "lazaratte" pit was/is a hoax), they could only "imagine" the extent of the alleged mass murder - to the tune of 3 million no less! |
July 22nd, 2008 | #786 | |
gassed at least 5 times
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Wolzek (get it?)
Posts: 1,176
|
Quote:
Answer the question. Is your title a fraud? Is it just you and no one else behind all the fluff?
__________________
RabbitNoMore But all jews do speak in absolutes though. Just like you. ----------- Define idiot |
|
July 22nd, 2008 | #787 | ||||
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 535
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Fear not the path of truth for the lack of those upon it.
|
||||
July 22nd, 2008 | #788 | ||
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 535
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Fear not the path of truth for the lack of those upon it.
|
||
July 22nd, 2008 | #789 | |
Member
|
Quote:
Why not Mule? Money should not matter - and rewards for capture, arrest and conviction of criminals are often offered. The victims of crimes are distinterred all the time, in order to prove a murder has been committed - I can cite many cases of crimes being solved by digging up the body; as new technology comes up - dna, the like, to prove murder was indeed committted. There was a recent segment on ABC's "48 Hours" wherein a woman had got away with killing two husbands, was working on her third husband as well as her own teenage daughter - for the insurance money - , when police became suspicious. The court was approached and, based upon probable cause suspicion, the police were given permission to dig up the woman's other husbands. Turns out she poisoned them - and was doing the same thing to both her new husband and her daughter from the second husband. She used a good method, and were it not for new technology, she would have continued killing jews refuse to allow the digging up of hoax remains, they base it on some obscure talmud law - but it's convenient when it comes maintaining the lie; yet today, the jewish families of murder victims do routinely allow disinterment if it means the murderer of Sammy or Sarah will be brought to justice So, this is the excuse you are going to use in order to get out of the deal; thinking to save face. Use of a ridiculous jewish superstition about "disturbing the dead" Last edited by EireannGoddess; July 22nd, 2008 at 07:11 PM. |
|
July 22nd, 2008 | #790 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
What remains????????
NO PROOF WHAT-SO-EVER exists that there is an ounce of human ash in Sobibors alleged "huge pile of human ash," and NO PROOF WHAT-SO-EVER exists that the remains of a single human, much less a greasy jew, are buried in the ground under the slight depressions found near the former Sobibor transit camp. And NO PROOF WHAT-SO-EVER exists that so much as a pound of bone has been found at Chelmno, much less what minuscule amount that has been found is human. And the only remains that have ever been found at Treblinka and Belzec were dug out of the cemeteries. (Imagine that - finding bodies buried in a cemetery.) Not a single grave has ever been located that contained so much as one percent of the alleged mass murder at these two camps. |
July 22nd, 2008 | #791 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Ced:
"I'm relieved because I thought you were creating a safety net for you to bail out of the NAFCASH challenge. Jews do that y'know: use indignance as a weapon." Oh but she is Ced - that's what this is: "I’m not resorting to emotionalism, just expressing my opinion that offering a money reward in exchange for digging up the remains of murdered human beings is contemptible – even if you irrationally and piously believe that no such remains exist." What remains Roberta? Let's see a single photo of the fraudulent "archeologist" Kola in the Sobibor camp. And while you’re at it, let's see a single photo of the fraudulent "skeptic" Shermer in Sobibor also. Just one photo Roberta. One. |
July 22nd, 2008 | #792 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Ced:
"That's the whole point of the NAFCASH challenge. Get on with it." Yeah Roberta, why don't you Hysterical Cowardly Homosexual Creeps espousing Holocaust Claptrap and Historical Canards - just get on with it? What are you greasy faggots waiting for Roberta? |
July 22nd, 2008 | #793 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
BTW Roberta, big-change-a-commin on the nafcash site - just for you.
Maybe even tomorrow, but no later than Fri - if all goes right. And rest your damaged little brain, THE SOBIBOR BONUS REWARD will be included, just as you insisted. Just one grave Roberta. Just one percent. One. Roberta: Sobibor - IV.2.2 Physical evidence documented on the site of the Sobibor Archaeological Project under http://www.undersobibor.org/. Exhibits currently available include this photo of artificial human teeth: http://www.undersobibor.org/excavation09.jpg . I must have missed it Roberta, can you show us the "huge mass grave" that these "artificial human teeth" were dug out of? |
July 23rd, 2008 | #794 | |||||||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Poor little Gerdes, he’s getting more incoherent every day. Looks like I’m turning him into a veritable nuthouse case. Not that he was ever far away from it, of course.
Quote:
Are his opponents supposed to set up a challenge equivalent to his? Are they supposed to offer a money reward in exchange for the "exact" location and "exact" dimensions of a mass grave containing a given amount of human remains? Is this fellow serious? No, Mr. Gerdes, even if I were a millionaire I wouldn’t set up such a challenge. I might invest a lot of money into archaeological research on the site of any of the former extermination camps, but I wouldn’t set up a public challenge promising a money reward to who shows me mass graves and remains of murdered human beings. And that’s not a matter of courage, it’s a matter of elementary human dignity. Setting up such kind of challenge is something only a sick mind like yours can conceive. Besides, your challenge is meant to support your idiotic claim that there are no mass graves and human remains corresponding to mass murder at any of the former extermination camp sites, isn’t it? As I’m not making such idiotic claim, I would have no reason to set up such a challenge even if I had a mind as sick as yours. Quote:
"Hysterical" – Gerdes is arguably the most hysterical loony in "Revisionist" cloud-cuckoo-land, and that is saying something. "Cowardly" – By running away from most of my questions, ignoring most of my arguments and most of the evidence I have provided, refusing to specify the requirements and conditions of his challenge, refusing to directly address my fellow HC bloggers after loudly mouthing off about them, and now also trying to distract from the somewhat dishonest conditions of his challenge by idiotically calling upon opponents to "match"that challenge, Gerdes has amply shown to be one of the most miserable, whimpering cowards in "Revisionist" cloud-cuckoo-land – and that surely is saying something as well. "Homosexual" – Gerdes’ obvious obsession with homosexuality strongly suggests that he’s a faggot who cannot live with being a faggot. "Creep" – It goes without saying that this term fits Gerdes like a glove. "Holocaust Claptrap" – An appropriate term for Gerdes’ baseless and counter-evidentiary "transit camp" theory. "Historical Canards" – An appropriate term for the Jew-hating and Hitler-kissing cloud-cuckoo-land vision of history that Gerdes and his fellow true believers are tying to promote. Thanks for describing yourself and your stance so precisely, Gerdes. And please keep up the self-projection, it’s always amusing. As to accepting the NAFCASH challenge, I have accepted it already. Regarding my fellow HC bloggers, who I cannot speak for, when will you scrounge up the courage to address them directly, as I suggested you do? There’s still nothing from Gerdes below the HC article Update on Gerdes & NAFCASH under http://holocaustcontroversies.blogsp...s-nafcash.html . You continue showing that you're a Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
If it is promising a money reward in exchange for "showing" a mass grave and its contents, see above. If it is looking for evidence that matches your challenge requirements, that’s what I am doing (though my part is more that of an observer than anything else), and as to my fellow HC bloggers, you should address them directly, as I suggested you do and you have so far lacked the courage to do. They may consider that responding to your challenge is as miserable as setting it up (an opinion I do not share), or they may want to become my competitors or my partners in this undertaking. Either way, I’m sure they will tell you if you ask them directly. But you’re too much a coward to do that, aren’t you? Quote:
And how about telling them that once a court has established their entitlement to the reward money they will have to run after 21 characterless (and probably also penniless) charlatans throughout the US in order to collect from each of these charlatans the share of the reward that he has committed to? That would be the honest thing to do, Gerdes. Your "easiest hundred grand" is simply a lie, and a lie so obvious that one must have manure instead of brains to fall for it. Quote:
[quote]To illustrate how fucking idiotic your demand is, let’s talk about the Soviet GuLag camps, which Solshenitsyn-fan Gerdes obviously accepts as a proven fact. Quote:
Quote:
In the long run, I’m waiting for evidence matching the NAFCASH challenge requirements that I expect to come along with the results of archaeological work that is currently being carried out on site. In the short run, I’m waiting for stinking coward Gerdes to answer the questions I asked him at the end of post # 777: Quote:
Quote:
Just keep up the show, Gerdes. Keep showing the reasonable part of our audience what kind of cowardly, lying, hysterical and lunatic filth it is that populates the "Revisionist" cloud-cuckoo-land. The lesson will surely be appreciated. |
|||||||||||
July 23rd, 2008 | #795 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
So if you think it would take Jewish money for you and your butt-buddies to make this challenge worth taking for who (unlike me) is primarily interested in the money (currently it is not, as the winning applicant will have to run after 21 characterless and probably also penniless jerks for the share of the reward amount to which each jerk is supposed to have committed), then I suggest you launch a call for such money. It’s not the applicant’s or potential applicant’s job to secure the financing, it’s the challenger’s job to do that. Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
July 23rd, 2008 | #796 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
So what is logically wrong with concluding – independently of how many names are known – that these 713,555 Jews, plus a couple ten thousand more shown by documentary evidence to have been brought to Treblinka in 1943 minus the few surviving escapees, were murdered at Treblinka extermination camp? Please explain, Mr. Gerdes. What court of justice or what historian do you think would repudiate this conclusion, and on what grounds? What possible other conclusion is borne out by the evidence and logically defensible? Let’s hear, Mr. Gerdes. And when you are through with this explanation, you will show us the parts of the Soviet investigation report from which it supposedly becomes apparent that the Soviets a) dug for mass graves on the site of Treblinka II and b) established that the mass grave by the "Lazarett" did not exist, won’t you? You may also admit that you have a lousy memory or were lying, of course. |
|||
July 23rd, 2008 | #797 | |||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Regarding the letter, I don’t remember having made any claims regarding any findings of Mr. Shermer’s, and I don’t even remember you having provided the page of Denying History mentioning the findings he is supposed to have claimed. As to Kola’s Sobibor investigation: Apart from the fact that – as you know very well – no photos of Kola’s archaeological investigation have yet been published, I don’t see why I should show you anything on this forum beyond what I have shown already. For the purposes of historical research, what documentary and eyewitness evidence and documentation or physical evidence I have shown qualifies as proof leaving no room for reasonable doubt that large-scale mass murder happened at Sobibor extermination camp, and your lamely and baselessly calling a renowned archaeologist "fraudulent" is manifestly insufficient to cast on the accuracy of Kola’s statements the doubt that alone would entitle you to yell for photographic or other corroboration of his stated findings. And for the purposes of the NAFCASH challenge, evidence is to be published in ARCHAEOLOGY or SKEPTIC magazine and not posted on a discussion forum, remember? Of course, if you want to loosen the challenge requirements … |
|||||
July 23rd, 2008 | #798 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
"Hysterical" – Gerdes is arguably the most hysterical loony in "Revisionist" cloud-cuckoo-land, and that is saying something. "Cowardly" – By running away from most of my questions, ignoring most of my arguments, refusing to specify the requirements and conditions of his challenge, refusing to directly address my fellow HC bloggers after loudly mouthing off about them, and now also trying to distract from the somewhat dishonest conditions of his challenge by idiotically calling upon opponents to "match" that challenge, Gerdes has amply shown to be one of the most miserable, whimpering cowards in "Revisionist" cloud-cuckoo-land – and that surely is saying something as well. "Homosexual" – Gerdes’ obvious obsession with homosexuality strongly suggests that he’s a faggot who cannot live with being a faggot. "Creep" – It goes without saying that this term fits Gerdes like a glove. "Holocaust Claptrap" – An appropriate term for Gerdes’ baseless and counter-evidentiary "transit camp" theory. "Historical Canards" – An appropriate term for the Jew-hating and Hitler-kissing cloud-cuckoo-land vision of history that Gerdes and his fellow true believers are tying to promote. Thanks for describing yourself and your stance so precisely, Gerdes. And please keep up the self-projection, it’s always amusing. Quote:
I for my part am waiting for current archaeological work on site to make Gerdes’ nightmares come true or for Gerdes to finally snap and be put into a strait-jacket and placed in a rubber cell, whatever happens first. Looks like there’s a good chance it will be the latter. |
||
July 23rd, 2008 | #799 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Exact quote with post number and link to the post, please. Or an admission that you have been lying again. Quote:
Does this information have anything to do with the NAFCASH challenge? I don’t think it does, but if you can show me that it does I’ll try to obtain information about the provenance of this exhibit and include in the article I intend to publish in ARCHAEOLOGY or SKEPTIC magazine after gaining access to the results of current archaeological excavations. If it doesn’t, what’s the relevance of your question supposed to be? |
||
July 23rd, 2008 | #800 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|