|
August 1st, 2008 | #941 | |||||||||||||||||
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 535
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Fear not the path of truth for the lack of those upon it.
|
|||||||||||||||||
August 1st, 2008 | #942 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 535
|
Quote:
Are you still up for the NAFCASH challenge or what?
__________________
Fear not the path of truth for the lack of those upon it.
|
|
August 1st, 2008 | #943 | |
gassed at least 5 times
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Wolzek (get it?)
Posts: 1,176
|
Quote:
__________________
RabbitNoMore But all jews do speak in absolutes though. Just like you. ----------- Define idiot |
|
August 1st, 2008 | #944 | |
Pussy Bünd "Commander"
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: land of the Friedman, home of the Braverman
Posts: 13,329
|
Quote:
Your corporeal existence is of no consequence. Here, you are a kike, you have always been a kike, and you will always be a kike! Capiche, Rabbi?
__________________
Worse than a million megaHitlers all smushed together. |
|
August 2nd, 2008 | #945 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Looks like Retardo has tucked tail and ran back to rodoh where her boyfriend can cover her ass (pun intended).
15 unanswered questions about Sobibor. Please notice the dullards continued refusal to answer / provide the following. It seems the following is just too inconvenient for her to answer and/or provide: 1 - Tell us on what EXACT dates her partner shermer was physically in the Sobibor camp. 2 - Show us photographs that prove he ever steped foot in the camp. 3 - Tell us on what EXACT dates her other partner Kola was physically in the Sobibor camp. 4 - Show us photographs that prove he ever steped foot in the camp. 5 - Show us photographs of Kola actually excavating the alleged graves. 6 - Show us photographs proving that said graves actually exist. 7 - Tell us what the results were of the analysis of those soil core samples that she claims are: "ashes of human bone and tissue for the light gray stuff, wood ashes for the black stuff and pure bone ashes or lime for the white stuff." 8 - Show us proof that the "huge ash mountain" of Sobibor is actually comprised of human ash. 9 - Show us were the huge pit is that this "mountain of human ash" was dug out of. 10 - We're waiting for Roberta to publish, in "SKEPTIC" magazine, proof that there exists just one mass grave that contains just one percent of the alleged mass murder at Sobibor and Treblinka. On what date can we expect this to be published Roberta? * See bottom of post Roberta: “Actually I’m able to prove the existence of all of these mass graves by simply referring to Prof. Kola’s description. Proof is contained in Prof. Kola’s published report about his findings on site, and in the documentary and eyewitness evidence about the mass killings at Sobibor, which is compatible with Kola’s findings.” 11 - And where can we find this published report? 12 - Or did you lie about it being published? 13 - BTW Roberta, why do you keep running from the queations about the soil core samples of Sobibor? 14 - What do the frauds at the Sobibor Archaeology Project say those core samples are comprised of? 15 - Can you show us a single bone or a single tooth that has been found at Sobibor? * * * * * * Please notice Roberta's cowardly response to questions # 10 (notice I said response, not answer. And her response was: * It will be answered in the form required on the NAFCASH site when the necessary information is available, interest and availability on the part of SKEPTIC magazine provided. No lying cowardly jewbitch. You accepted THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE. That means, you will submit to "SKEPTIC" magazine your "proof." If - IF - "SKEPTIC" magazine rejects your submittal, then, we will discuss whether or not ARCHAEOLOGY magazine can be used as an alternative source in your attempt to become a claimant for the reward money. You're so transparent retardo. Thank you again for showing the world what a cowardly liar you are. BTW Roberta, have I ever told you that your priceless? |
August 2nd, 2008 | #946 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Ced:
"Are you still up for the NAFCASH challenge or what?" All the cowardly greasy jewbitch has done is try and run since she accepted the challenge. And if that aint enough, she's also trying to use her acceptance of the challenge as a way out of answering questions here. Nothing she can post here will effect in any way her proving the existence of just one "huge mass grave" that contains the remains of just one percent of the alleged mass murder at Sobibor and/or Treblinka. But she's cowardly trying to use that as an out. What a coward. |
August 2nd, 2008 | #947 | |
gassed at least 5 times
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Wolzek (get it?)
Posts: 1,176
|
Quote:
__________________
RabbitNoMore But all jews do speak in absolutes though. Just like you. ----------- Define idiot |
|
August 2nd, 2008 | #948 | |
Member
|
Quote:
Actually, I would be interested to see the Mule's work in any magasine; but not all are offering reward monies. Mule accepted Herr Gerde's offer, so why not publish his work there, within a reasonable time. |
|
August 2nd, 2008 | #949 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
In this context, there are some questions I would like to ask you: 1. How many ethnic Germans do you think perished during wartime flight and postwar expulsion from Germany’s eastern territories and countries of Eastern Europe? 2. What "hard evidence" is the figure you accept based on? 3. How many Germans do you think perished in the bombing attack on Dresden on 13/14 February 1945? 4. What "hard evidence" is the figure you accept based on? 5. How many Germans do you think perished in all bombing attacks on German cities during World War II? 6. What "hard evidence" is the figure you accept based on? Quote:
There’s my bloodthirsty little thing. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Ich nehm’ als Judenjunge immer nur deutsche Mädchen mit auf’s Zimmer. Quote:
And such proof would lead you to accept the veracity of the historical record of the Nazi genocide of the Jews? Not a very logical position on your part, but OK. What would you accept as proof? Quote:
Talk about other boards, how about coming to RODOH one of these days? I can assure you that an Aryan specimen like you would have many admirers there – and give others much to laugh about. Think about it over the next three weeks, OK? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
August 2nd, 2008 | #950 | ||||||||||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Some crazy fellow leads my country (the object of my pride) to shame and disaster. I hate that crazy fellow for having led my country (the object of my pride) to shame and disaster. Quote:
Ah, and if you’re looking for someone who needs a lecture on character, I suggest your friend Gerdes. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||||||||||
August 2nd, 2008 | #951 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
See you in three weeks, my friend. |
|||
August 2nd, 2008 | #952 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
And the question is not why not SKEPTIC. There's nothing wrong with SKETPIC. The question is: why SKEPTIC alone? |
||
August 2nd, 2008 | #953 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
In my post # 916 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...&postcount=916 , I responded to a number of questions that bitching fish-wife Gerdes was making a big bloody fuss about. Each answer was introduced with an assessment of what relevance a given question or group of questions had (most of them have little if any relevance within the context of the NAFCASH challenge, not to mention within the context of proving the mass murder that happened at Sobibor) before I provided the answer proper according to the present status of my knowledge.
How did miserable coward Gerdes react to these answers? One part of his reaction was his hysterical howling in posts # 937 and # 938, which I shall have fun with later. The other, which is the subject of this post, was going to the CODOH "Revisionist" Cesspit (where, as the coward knows, I am not allowed to post ) and, on the thread he opened there under http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=5059 , whine about me a little more to his bird-of-a-feather Jonnie "Hannover" Hargis, a close match of Gerdes as concerns mendacity, cowardice, obnoxiousness and plain stupidity. Previous conversations between these two showpieces of "Revisionist" scum and other enlightened spirits (including one who is a bit more intelligent than the rest and therefore stands out among the herd of imbeciles like a one-eyed among the blind, Mr. Laurentz Dahl) have been commented in my articles on the HC blog under the following links: http://holocaustcontroversies.blogsp...challenge.html http://holocaustcontroversies.blogsp...llenge_28.html http://holocaustcontroversies.blogsp...enge_4802.html http://holocaustcontroversies.blogsp...llenge_29.html http://holocaustcontroversies.blogsp...llenge_30.html The latest CODOH posts of Gerdes and "Hannover" Hargis will be the subject of another update on the HC blog, which will have a link to the present post. Here we go: Quote:
Contrary to what Gerdes apparently tries to make believe, however, I didn’t make any pretense that any of my answers or all of them together prove the existence of the Sobibor mass graves. I expressly pointed out, at the beginning of each answer, just how relevant – if at all – I considered the respective question to be in the context of proving the mass murder at Sobibor, and thus also the related mass graves. Most of Gerdes’ questions are of little if any relevance in this context. Thus my answer to question # 11, for instance, was the following: Quote:
Gerdes thus once more – as so often before – indulged in misrepresentation of his opponent’s argument. Quote:
It is particularly noteworthy that Gerdes is still unable to provide an alternative theory as to what, other than ashes of human bones and tissue, wood ashes and bone ash or lime, the substances clearly distinguishable from the soil on these core sample photographs from Prof. Kola’s 2001 archaeological investigation: http://www.sobibor.edu.pl/angielska/...adania/F5.html http://www.sobibor.edu.pl/angielska/...adania/F6.html http://www.sobibor.edu.pl/angielska/...adania/F7.html could possibly be. That is truly pathetic. And while this is not a big deal, it should be pointed out that lying Gerdes well knows that the captions of the photos from the Ghetto Fighters House included in his list are not mine, contrary to what he seems to be claiming. They are from the Ghetto Fighters House. Quote:
I didn’t exactly tell him that the results of my research would be available the day after tomorrow – on the contrary, I made it very clear that my research depended on the progress of archaeological work currently being done by the Sobibor Archaeology Project on site, that archaeological work takes time and that professional archaeologists don’t set their schedules according to the ramblings of a mad-man like Gerdes. Yet Gerdes seems to be mendaciously pretending that I announced a prompt submittal of evidence meeting his challenge requirements, and that his daily "show me, show me" - demands (which actually just express the nervousness and hysteria of a coward who is scared shitless of the day his nightmares will come true) are somehow justified. But Gerdes is not the only one who is nervous about what physical evidence will eventually be rubbed under his nose and even about the comparatively small parts of that evidence that he has already been confronted with. Chicken-shit liar Jonnie "Hannover" Hargis, always brave when mouthing off about me where I cannot respond because he banned me from his place but never brave enough to confront me directly (not even on a forum of anti-Semitic white supremacists where he can count on peer support), thinks it’s time another of his lame attempts at rationalization: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
So Hannover has once more shown the poverty of his reasoning and his lack of a plausible alternative explanation, i.e. one that takes all evidence to what happened in the area of these drillings into account. But at least he tried, which is not what can be said of poor Gerdes. He gets points for that. Quote:
Quote:
Gerdes seems to think much of Hargis, however. It looks as if he visits Hargis' Cesspit every time he needs that genius's advice to respond to questions that are too much for his own meager intellect. The meager intellect of Mr. Gerdes is again shown in his next CODOH post, in which he echoes his admired master and teacher: [Gerdes in CODOH post of Fri Aug 01, 2008 4:33 pm] Hannover: "They all resort to the same absurd, irrational, illogical, impossible, and unscientific silliness." Yes, and my most recent favorite is this: *...these samples... pertain to Prof. Kola’s archaeological investigation in 2001 - This means that if – as is probably the case – these core samples were analyzed to confirm that they contain what their aspect suggests" So they were "probably" analyzed, and the analysis "confirmed" what "their aspects suggests?" If the liar doesn't even know for a fact that they were analyzed, then how the hell would he know if "what their aspects suggests" was "confirmed?" LOL![quote] Poor Gerdes, he cannot even read. My answers to his questions 21, 22 and 23, in post # 916 under http://206.41.117.128/showpost.php?p...&postcount=916 , read as follows: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
a) the aspect of the samples suggests the presence of human remains, b) Prof. Kola is known to have identified mass graves at Sobibor and these samples are from his investigation and c) a competent professional archaeologist – which previous work by Prof. Kola has shown him to be – can be expected so have such samples analyzed. What is more, Kola is known to have ordered an analysis of core drill samples found at Belzec, and this analysis established that they contained human remains. There’s no reason why he should have proceeded differently at Sobibor. Quote:
Quote:
If these photos show what they are captioned to show by the source featuring them, they are further corroboration of what becomes apparent from all known documentary and eyewitness evidence and from other documentation of the physical evidence at Sobibor. The only thing absurd, irrational and illogical here is the imbecile babbling of frauds like you. And what’s impossible and unscientific is the postulate of an invisible resettlement operation taking over 1.3 million people via the Aktion Reinhard(t) camps without leaving a single piece of documentary evidence or a single eyewitness when there should be a huge paper trail of the former and thousands upon thousands of the latter. Or the postulate of a monstrously powerful and invisible conspiracy that made all this evidence disappear and fabricated all known evidence that the camps in question were extermination camps. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
August 2nd, 2008 | #954 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Now to Gerdes’ hysterical babbling in posts # 937 and # 938.
# 937: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The post number and the link, Mr. Gerdes? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I have already shown a photo of artificial teeth found on the area of Sobibor: http://www.undersobibor.org/excavation09.jpg If I remember correctly (if not, I’m showing them for the first time), I have also already shown these photographs of bone fragments found in the area of Sobibor extermination camp: http://www.holocaustresearchproject....fragments.html http://www.holocaustresearchproject....n%20brick.html This photo, included im my post # 777 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...&postcount=777 among others, also shows human bones among the ashes: A glass display case containing ashes and bones of victims of the Sobibor extermination camp. http://www.infocenters.co.il/gfh_mul...5968_1_web.jpg All 15 imbecile questions have thus been reasonable answered to the best of my present knowledge. Answers will be expanded as I learn more about the subject matter of the questions. Quote:
Second, where’s the "cowardly" part of my reply? I’m only making a perfectly logical statement: the question will be answered in the form required on the NAFCASH site (i.e. by publishing the evidence in SKEPTIC magazine), provided that the editors of SKEPTIC magazine are interested in publishing this evidence. If the editors of SKEPTIC magazine are not interested in publishing this evidence, I cannot force them to do so, can I? Think before writing, you numb nut. Quote:
Topix post # 70 under http://www.topix.com/forum/history/T...L8H7P8C/p4#c70 : Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
What we have now is that if SKEPTIC magazine are not interested in publishing my article, "we will discuss whether or not ARCHAEOLOGY magazine can be used as an alternative source in your attempt to become a claimant for the reward money" - which, for all I’ve seen of greasy slime-ball player Gerdes, will end in a NO to ARCHAEOLOGY magazine. Why was to change made on the NAFCASH site, Mr. Gerdes? Why were an applicant’s already limited publication options further restricted? I have submitted that you did this because you thought you had noticed a preference on my part for ARCHAEOLOGY over SKEPTIC magazine, an assumption that is supported by your fuss about unfavorable comments I made regarding Shermer’s qualities as a researcher, the obvious intention of which was to make sure that Shermer’s resentment against me would bar my access to SKEPTIC magazine and thus leave me with no publishing option at all. As you so aptly put it in one of your posts, you made that change just for me. This, of course, means that you’re scared shitless of evidence meeting your challenge requirements being actually provided, and that you also know how full of shit your "Revisionist" articles of faith are. It makes you a liar and a coward par excellence. But I’m open to hearing an alternative explanation for your having scratched ARCHAEOLOGY magazine. Let’s hear, Mr. Gerdes. Your cowardly silence shall be taken as meaning confirmation of my supposition. Quote:
Quote:
But of course you’re free to continue making a bloody fool of yourself as often as you like, Mr. Gerdes. The more often you do, the worse for you and "Revisionism", and the better for me and elementary common sense. Quote:
Keep making yourself and "Revisionism" look like shit, Mr. Gerdes. I’m enjoying every minute of it. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
August 2nd, 2008 | #955 | |||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
1. A positive response to the question at the end of my post # 916: Quote:
Quote:
4. On the CODOH thread http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=5059, a link to the present VNN thread and links to my HC articles under the following links: http://holocaustcontroversies.blogsp...challenge.html http://holocaustcontroversies.blogsp...llenge_28.html http://holocaustcontroversies.blogsp...enge_4802.html http://holocaustcontroversies.blogsp...llenge_29.html http://holocaustcontroversies.blogsp...llenge_30.html 5. On the CODOH thread http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=5059 , an invitation to Jonnie "Hannover" Hargis to report for debate on this VNN thread starting 25 August 2008. You have three weeks for all the above, Mr. Gerdes. You can use these three weeks to make up for the cowardly behavior you have displayed throughout our discussions, or you can keep showing yourself as a mendacious and obnoxious bigmouth with no balls. The choice is yours. |
|||||||
August 2nd, 2008 | #956 | |||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
I have tried to make the NAFCASH challenge more fair and transparent, but at the same time made clear that your keeping it as the hoax it was when I accepted it and even introducing further restrictions reducing an applicant’s chances (excluding Chelmno and Belzec from the challenge and ARCHAEOLOGY magazine as a publication choice) wouldn’t dissuade me from trying to obtain and provide evidence that meets the challenge requirements. And while I think there’s not much of a point in asking and answering questions about matters are either irrelevant to the challenge or that proof meeting the challenge requirements will address, I have provided reasonable answers, to the best of my present knowledge, to all your hysterically worded questions. Quote:
Quote:
Again, when I come back from vacation I want to see the following: 1. A positive response to the question at the end of my post # 916: Quote:
Quote:
4. On the CODOH thread http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=5059, a link to the present VNN thread and links to my HC articles under the following links: http://holocaustcontroversies.blogsp...challenge.html http://holocaustcontroversies.blogsp...llenge_28.html http://holocaustcontroversies.blogsp...enge_4802.html http://holocaustcontroversies.blogsp...llenge_29.html http://holocaustcontroversies.blogsp...llenge_30.html 5. On the CODOH thread http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=5059 , an invitation to Jonnie "Hannover" Hargis to report for debate on this VNN thread starting 25 August 2008. And just to make this very clear, in case you feel like claiming that I’m looking for a way out: your compliance with the above is no condition for anything, especially not for my sticking with the NAFCASH challenge. I’m just giving you a chance to make good for the cowardly and obnoxious behavior you have displayed throughout this discussion. Whether you want to take this chance or not is your problem alone. If you want to ignore all my requests and continue showing that you’re a piece of chicken-shit, that’s just fine with me. |
|||||
August 2nd, 2008 | #957 | |
gassed at least 5 times
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Wolzek (get it?)
Posts: 1,176
|
Quote:
__________________
RabbitNoMore But all jews do speak in absolutes though. Just like you. ----------- Define idiot |
|
August 2nd, 2008 | #958 | ||
Member
|
Quote:
I am not going to post my family history and name on an i-net Board; especially to answer a jew's question, information I am certain the juden would love to have just on general principle. Also, neither my family nor myself have demanded reparation or museums to memorialise our private loss as well Germany's - a museum that is favourable to the Reich and it's dead. Promise me the return of my Fatherland to us, the removal of foreign, non-White and non-Aryans from Germany, an end to the Occupying government; a repeal with apology of all holocaust denial laws and release of Revisionists and lawyers that are now incarcerated in Germany; then, perhaps, it would be worth exposing my family name to the juden and other enemies. You are trying to compare Germany's loss to holocaustian claims and make the loss equal to that of a jew - well, Germany's loss has been far greater than any jewish lie, especially their holocaustian Hoax. Quote:
Why not. You are enough of a ghoul to warrant a few fotos. There's many more fotos of course; but I try to adhere to VNNF standards regarding gory fotos. Last edited by EireannGoddess; August 2nd, 2008 at 07:44 PM. |
||
August 2nd, 2008 | #959 | |||||||||||||
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 535
|
They're your words and they represent your feelings. You've tried harder than anyone I've known to twist and wriggle out of these first three or four strange answers you gave to a simple question. This makes you a staunch errorist and really does put a question mark over your ability to tell the truth on any issue whether important or not.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The fear of the object of pride being damaged or hurt leads to hate and everlasting determination to exact revenge in your case - and many others who fear the resurgence of authority. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Fear not the path of truth for the lack of those upon it.
|
|||||||||||||
August 2nd, 2008 | #960 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,046
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|