Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old March 27th, 2016 #41
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

The Enemy of Europe

pp 24-35

The Metapolitics of the War

Notes: from 1000-1800, wars in europe were dynastic-religious; in 19th century they were nationalist-economic; in 20th century, age of absolute politics, whole world involved, but it boils down to Western Imperium vs Outer Forces. "During the war, America deprived its own armed forces of huge masses of war materiel, which it delivered to Russia without charge and without any terms of repayment." (p. 26) the washington regime in no way pursued an American policy (after jew revolution of 1933, under FDR). English capitalism won pseudo-victory over Idea of Ethical Socialism, meaning and resulting in "chaos" for Europe. US only won war in military sense vs japan. the outer forces expelled the west from most of the pacific.

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/M...pe-pp24-35.mp3 (28m)
 
Old March 30th, 2016 #42
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

(from The Enemy of Europe, by Yockey)

[section 3 of 4]

pp 36-61

The Morphology of the Third World War

Notes: enemy in washington sought not to vanquish a state but to destroy the culture-bearing stratum of 250k souls responsible for Europe's destiny. hence at end of war it continued to starve and mass murder the leading population (in germany). Ethical Socialism is the destined state-form of Europe in Age of Absolute Politics (1900 on, basically). the 'Michel' stratum area america-helping nationless shits, the opposite of the Culture-bearing stratum, and helpful in overturning and oppressing it. these are led by the 'churchills,' the top representative of the type. the west was anglicised from 1750-1900, but shifted after the Boer war, from economic-materialist nationalism to Ethical Socialism and the Resurgence of Authority. transitions on many fronts began then. "a dynamic policy needs its own terminology" - must always talk about Europe, its Destiny, not the 19th century nations. we can only view race "horizontally" now. that is, the spiritual race one FEELS one belongs to means everything; the anatomic-nationalist group one is born into means nothing. so he argues race is a spiritual thing, not a biological thing. or much more than a biological thing. he says it was tragic that the bio notion of race was "engrafted" onto the "European Revolution of 1933" since there was no necessary connection. idea opposed to what most of us would think. Europe will have a "Prussian-ethical" future or none at all.

[accidental break in recording so two links]
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/M...e-pp36-61a.mp3 (34m)
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/M...e-pp36-61b.mp3 (36m)

Last edited by Alex Linder; March 30th, 2016 at 02:47 PM.
 
Old March 30th, 2016 #43
Jim Harting
Senior Member
 
Jim Harting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 850
Jim Harting
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
(The Enemy of Europe, by Yockey)

pp 36-61

The Morphology of the Third World War

we can only view race "horizontally" now. that is, the spiritual race one FEELS one belongs to means everything; the anatomic-nationalist group one is born into means nothing. so he argues race is a spiritual thing, not a biological thing. or much more than a biological thing. he says it was tragic that the bio notion of race was "engrafted" onto the "European Revolution of 1933" since there was no necessary connection. idea opposed to what most of us would think.
Yes, and here again we see the great, tragic flaw in Yockey's thought: he denies that race is a biological reality, and instead consigns the concept of race to some wispy, insubstantial "spiritual" realm.

Yockey himself was one-quarter Jewish (paternal grandfather), so for him, any biological definition of race was psychologically unacceptable. Instead of the White race or the Aryan race, he speaks of a "European race," which is an elective affinity: anyone can belong to it, regardless of ancestry, if they share its "rhythms," as Yockey obviously thought that he did.
__________________
NEW ORDER on GAB: https://gab.ai/NEW_ORDER
NS Publications: http://nspublications.com
VNN National Socialist Union: https://vnnforum.com/group.php?groupid=58
 
Old April 1st, 2016 #44
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

[section 4 of 4]

pp 62-93-END

The Politics of Europe

Notes: Feminine-matriarchal life is routine; hence American life is routine and technicized. Books instruct the population "How To Win Friends," how social life, family life, sexual life are to be conducted. Yet this uniformisation of life is not perceived as burdensome or ignominious -- the American population is entirely passive and feels quite at home in this atmosphere of a nursery. The social instincts predominate over the individual instincts, and every American child is taught from his earliest days that the essence of leading a successful life is "getting along with people." There is no other way to realize this ideal than to renounce one's individuality. That is the explanation for the difficulty of kindling any kind of political opposition in America. As soon as a policy secures a foothold and becomes popular, it is right and respectable. Radical or persistent criticism is impossible in America; the term "individualist" is nearly an insult. The extirpation of strong individuality precludes the rise of a true elite, an aristocracy, a ruling-stratum, for these are always based upon strong individuality and the feeling of uniqueness. All feelings of superiority, of higher self-esteem, of uniqueness are educated out of the American while he is still in kindergarten. It is impressed on him that his existence, his problems are exactly like those of everybody else. [compare with what mencken said about america lacking an aristocracy]. americas elite is jewish, and the technical-managerial class serves them without worrying about its own agenda. russians by contrast are barbarians. america obsessed with technics because it cares about peace and comfort. america's only contribution to philosophy is pragmatism: truth is what works. mass-ideal. intolerance of noncomformity. spirit and soul are dogmatically denied, all is matter of conditioning and environment - the External.

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/M...p62-93-END.mp3 (1:27)

Last edited by Alex Linder; April 1st, 2016 at 02:12 PM.
 
Old April 5th, 2016 #45
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Revilo Oliver: The Enemy of Our Enemies

pp 1-28

Part One

Notes: jews had yockey's german version of EoE destroyed, but few copies escaped. just as FDR had donald day's book Onward Christian Soldiers destroyed at its NYC publisher, and Day barred from reentering country. aryan is correct general word for whites: heroism, chivalry, magnanimity - us at our best. spengler's 'morphology of history' proved flat wrong - ignored the jews. historionomy is attempt to dscover laws of history; began, says RO, in 1876 with Funck-Brentano's La civilisation et ses lois (civiliation and its laws). Seneca made first clear stastement that cvilizations are at least quasi-biological. spengler's radical new idea was that the Western Civilization is not a continuation of the Classical, but its own thing. in the renaissance, the best europeans spontaneously turned to golden-age pagan greece and rome for models. they dd not admire all greece and roman history, just the flowerings. they were not aware of racial changes or the racial underay of these golden ages, they simply were attracted to them by instinct. main flaw of spengler and yockey is "almost perverse equivocation" about the biological reality of race. boas was a "twisted" jew whose bogus data spengler was taken in by. he created ruth benedict, who concocted a piece of fiction about the Zuni indians in Patterns of Culture" intended to do the usual frankfurt loosening on the minds of 1930s white americans. nossig - one drop theory. yockey/spengler to an inordinate degree underplay not to say deny biological reality of race in favor of making it a spiritual or landscape-bound thing, rather than genetic.

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/M...t1a-pp1-28.mp3 (1:41)
 
Old April 6th, 2016 #46
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Revilo Oliver: The Enemy of Our Enemies

pp 29-50

Part One

Notes: magian (jew) culture foisted on Faustian (aryan) people. yet yockey/spengler have little to say about this pseudo-morphosis. christianity is judaized zoroastrianism, which is dualism - good and evil gods do battle, fight for individual souls. "And nothing basic is changed by replacing Ahuramazda/Jehovah with an abstraction, such as "democracy," and replacing Ahriman/Satan with another, such as "aristocracy." as long as we're christian, we cant defend ourselves: "So long as our minds are clouded by the Zoroastrian myth, we shall be incapable of rational thought for our own survival." pagan as a propaganda term used by church fathers. "The Zoroastrian dualism may fairly be called the most devastating mental disease that ever became epidemic on this planet." (p. 43-44).

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/M...1b-pp29-50.mp3 (1:20)
 
Old April 8th, 2016 #47
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Revilo Oliver: The Enemy of Our Enemies

pp 51-80

Part Two

Notes: Prince Sturdza (Romanian diplomat) and Scotsman Nicoll were clearest thinkers on Europe and wwii, as of 1949. jews let disraeli into peerage. soon enough jews are all thru the govt and undermining the empire by encouraging revolt among contented nativesw in places such as india.


http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/M...2a-pp51-80.mp3 (1:31)

Last edited by Alex Linder; April 8th, 2016 at 04:35 PM.
 
Old April 18th, 2016 #48
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Revilo Oliver: The Enemy of Our Enemies

pp 80-112

Part Two

Notes: Prince Sturdza (Romanian diplomat) and Scotsman Nicoll were clearest thinkers on Europe and wwii, as of 1949. jews let disraeli into peerage. soon enough jews are all thru the govt and undermining the empire by encouraging revolt among contented nativesw in places such as india. early example of jew forgery: sybilline oracles. jews didnt invent monotheism. they were henotheistic (worshipped their god(s) but acknowledged others), they copied or stole or appropriated monotheism from the Stoics). this seems to be what RPO is saying. ... stalin turned against jews? maybe for 6 months (nov '52 to march '53). was he poisoned by jews, first unsuccessfully, then successfully? possibly.) jews still retain great power, never lost it, exception, possible, of few months mentioned, dominating politburo, enjoying special privileges (emigration, etc), enemies stuck in mental hospitals, enriching themselves thru black market allowed to exist under Soviet communism

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/M...b-pp80-112.mp3 (1:58)

Last edited by Alex Linder; April 18th, 2016 at 07:59 AM.
 
Old April 19th, 2016 #49
Joe_Smith
Senior Member
 
Joe_Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
Joe_Smith
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Harting View Post
Yes, and here again we see the great, tragic flaw in Yockey's thought: he denies that race is a biological reality, and instead consigns the concept of race to some wispy, insubstantial "spiritual" realm.

Yockey himself was one-quarter Jewish (paternal grandfather), so for him, any biological definition of race was psychologically unacceptable. Instead of the White race or the Aryan race, he speaks of a "European race," which is an elective affinity: anyone can belong to it, regardless of ancestry, if they share its "rhythms," as Yockey obviously thought that he did.
Where is the evidence Yockey was part jewish? I doubt that.

Nothing that race is far more than its zoology is important, that doesn't necessarily deny its biological reality.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'"
― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona
 
Old April 19th, 2016 #50
Jim Harting
Senior Member
 
Jim Harting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 850
Jim Harting
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe_Smith View Post
Where is the evidence Yockey was part jewish? I doubt that.
That Yockey was one-quarter Jewish is well known. See, for instance, Chapter 5 of Kevin Coogan's biography of him Dreamer of the Day. FPY's official paternal grandfather died three years before the birth of his father. His grandmother took up with a local Jew, who later helped raise FPY and taught him how to play the piano and so forth.

That in itself does not invalidate anything that Yockey wrote, but it does help explain why he advocated "spiritual racialism" rather than racial theory rooted in biological reality.
__________________
NEW ORDER on GAB: https://gab.ai/NEW_ORDER
NS Publications: http://nspublications.com
VNN National Socialist Union: https://vnnforum.com/group.php?groupid=58
 
Old April 19th, 2016 #51
Joe_Smith
Senior Member
 
Joe_Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
Joe_Smith
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Harting View Post
That Yockey was one-quarter Jewish is well known. See, for instance, Chapter 5 of Kevin Coogan's biography of him Dreamer of the Day. FPY's official paternal grandfather died three years before the birth of his father. His grandmother took up with a local Jew, who later helped raise FPY and taught him how to play the piano and so forth.

That in itself does not invalidate anything that Yockey wrote, but it does help explain why he advocated "spiritual racialism" rather than racial theory rooted in biological reality.
I'd have to look into that though I don't think it matters either. Even if true, I wouldn't blame that alone for his spiritual racialism. Certain strains of thought in the NSDAP had a similar point of view, and correct me if I'm wrong, so did Spengler.

When these men talk of race they are talking about it on a different plane. They assume you already know there is a biological component to race, but they're talking about it on a national or ethnogenesis level. For example, the American is a fusion of Irish and German, the Argentine Italian and Spanish, the Australian misc British Isles--all of them distinct from the people the individual nations supplying the antecedents.

Most old world nationalists were somewhat hostile to the concept of white being some biological determinist be all end all as Yockey is (partly why he has made more of an impact with European intellectuals than in the US). Using this logic the Incas weren't Incas, they were "brown", the Chinese weren't Chinese, they were "yellow". While they may have been part of general correspondent tendencies (although by no means as coherent as the Occident, granted, probably because Asia and Americas are much larger), they differed from Aztecs or Japanese in important ways even if they looked the same or even shared haplogroups.

The only way to explain these differences is to seek some kind of spiritual or instinctual or whatever you want to call it difference. Which is what I take Yockey means by spiritual race.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'"
― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona
 
Old April 20th, 2016 #52
Jimmy Marr
Moderator
 
Jimmy Marr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Jew S. A.
Posts: 3,674
Jimmy Marr
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe_Smith View Post
The only way to explain these differences is to seek some kind of spiritual or instinctual or whatever you want to call it difference. Which is what I take Yockey means by spiritual race.
I sense that the spiritual racists of that period (Yockey and his theoretical predecessors) were a priori opposed to biological racism because they had pre-defined the greatest social/political problem of their age as materialism, and while they were attracted to hierarchical aesthetics of biological racism, they also considered it to be yet another form of materialism.

In short, I think they were still grappling, in their own way, with remedial impulses in the wake of God's death.
 
Old April 20th, 2016 #53
Joe_Smith
Senior Member
 
Joe_Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
Joe_Smith
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy Marr View Post
I sense that the spiritual racists of that period (Yockey and his theoretical predecessors) were a priori opposed to biological racism because they had pre-defined the greatest social/political problem of their age as materialism, and while they were attracted to hierarchical aesthetics of biological racism, they also considered it to be yet another form of materialism.

In short, I think they were still grappling, in their own way, with remedial impulses in the wake of God's death.
Possibly. You see similar stuff in Evola, Dugin , Heidegger, et al.

What separates a German from a Frenchman is traditionally not their looks or their genotype (even if there are some rough or vague differences here, most of Europe is to scale, EG, phenotypes and genotypes gradually change the further south or north or east or west you go but you can't delineate nations using this alone), but rather, their experience, destiny , ethnogenesis, etc. This is actually changing in Europe right now thanks to the EU, and some degree of mixing between groups has always happened (which is what Yockey frames as the spiritual race, the aborbtion of new tendencies that alter the character of people, many times for the better, though not always), but it is none the less still true.

A German like Goebbels may have physically looked like a typical Latin, perhaps embodying a Roman atavism or just regular diversity that naturally occurs within most European states, but his soul and subconscious was more Germanic than the blondest and most metrically Nordic Italian. If human beings were nothing but breeds of dog--though breed is by no means a completely irrelevant factor--this does not explain entire story when speaking within the West.

Go throughout Germany, France, Spain, UK and you will see there is overlap between and within haplogroups, but nobody but a retarded clown would say we should pluck the R1b Spaniard, Frenchman, Pole and Brit and use this as a foundation to form a new nation with them. The fact that every Euro nation has diversity in haplogroups, physical appearance, etc, yet still form coherent and connected distinct identities beyond these, is evidence of race having a metaphysical character--like the young chicken who intuitive knows to fear the chickenhawk despite never experiencing it.

"White" works in America is because the castles, bones and memories of the old world are replaced with TGI Fridays and baseball. Add to that the fact that most whites in the US don't ever stay in one place and lay down roots, but instead move around like Gypsies chasing riches and job opportunities. Basically, most of us new world whites are mutts who identify one another by skin color or taste in music rather than anything substantial--which is why despite having more liberty than Europeans to organize politically, our groups never amount to anything and internal misunderstandings are galore.

Sad but true. Which is why the priority of any political group in the Americas should be to spur a genuine ethnogenesis, and create a binding history from scratch, as did the distinct Celts, Germans, Wends, etc who despite centuries of living in the same vicinity, only were able to form a united "Germany" in the 19th century.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'"
― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona

Last edited by Joe_Smith; April 20th, 2016 at 02:35 PM.
 
Old April 23rd, 2016 #54
Sean Gruber
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,439
Sean Gruber
Default

What's wrong with scientific knowledge?

Carleton Coon identified 5 European races. We don't need all these sub-sub-sub-sub every-village-is-a-different-race categories.

Worldwide, it's three. Caucasian -- Negroid -- Mongoloid.

Every place (village, province, whatever) has its genius, but scientifically there are large, basic differences in race.

Even jews can be clearly identified by race.
__________________
No jews, just right

Less talk, more action
 
Old April 23rd, 2016 #55
Joe_Smith
Senior Member
 
Joe_Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
Joe_Smith
Default

Yockey and co aren't denying that Gruber. If you visualize a map of Yockey's Western Imperium, you'll note that outside of Europe, he includes New Zealand, Australia, Argentina, Southern Brazil, USA, Canada, and Uruguay. But not countries which at the time of the writing of his book had an ostensibly European-derived culture but whites were not the clear majority: South Africa and Mexico, for example.

Obviously, Yockey did not consider Rupert the tassel uniformed "Royal African Guard" of Her Majesty to be a spiritual Aryan just because of his posts empty symbolism, his english language, or acquired tea habit. The biological aspect of race even in the 1940's and 50's was considered to be a given, which is why he extrapolated more on the metaphysics of this.

Empiricism doesn't explain everything, and even when it does explain things, it is often wrong. Getting caught up in HBD skull-measuring or haplogroups rather than the tangible trajectory of a race in action is a huge mistake many in America make.

Trying to ascertain characteristics from people depending on their sub-race classification has slight merit (as phrenology does), but depending on this borderline pseudo-science is not a good way to fully understand race.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'"
― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona
 
Old May 26th, 2016 #56
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Revilo Oliver: The Enemy of Our Enemies

pp 112-147 [END]

(part 2c)

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/M...12-147-END.mp3

NOTES: history is a weapon. twist the past to create the future you want. history is what is good for jews, factual truth doesnt matter. this is their true attitude, and shows why they put little effort into avoiding contradictions or making their lies plausible. you should want to believe what is good for jews, and it's self-evident this is all that matters. holohoax contraditions, old testament contradictions.


[end of this book. will be doing Protocols next, in a new thread.]
 
Old May 15th, 2017 #57
Massgrave
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4
Massgrave
Default

I think you mentioned this at the 177 mark of Imperium, but you doubt that organic is a real thing, well its basically this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...dopmG3o#t=1026
or this:

Organic culture is tribalist, long-lasting, slow to develop but resists foreigners or invaders.

Imperial culture is easily digestable, artificial, lifeless, lacking substance and can be just as easily forgotten and discarded.

Imperial culture is not organic because its not tied to any nature category, not tied to a particular people or place, i.e. in WN or Realist speak, a particular ethnicity, race or nationality of people.
 
Old May 15th, 2017 #58
zoomcopter
Senior Member
 
zoomcopter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The goyim reservation
Posts: 4,715
Blog Entries: 3
zoomcopter
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Massgrave View Post
I think you mentioned this at the 177 mark of Imperium, but you doubt that organic is a real thing, well its basically this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...dopmG3o#t=1026
or this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ha2VGS_livg

Organic culture is tribalist, long-lasting, slow to develop but resists foreigners or invaders.

Imperial culture is easily digestable, artificial, lifeless, lacking substance and can be just as easily forgotten and discarded.

Imperial culture is not organic because its not tied to any nature category, not tied to a particular people or place, i.e. in WN or Realist speak, a particular ethnicity, race or nationality of people.
Thanks for posting this outstanding first post. Red Ice is doing some very good work.
__________________
Ann Coulter is correct. A VNN poster in Florida needs to file a complaint against Barry Krischer, with the Florida Bar, leading to disbarment and hopefully, imprisonment.
 
Old June 16th, 2017 #59
Massgrave
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4
Massgrave
Default

Thanks. Theres a couple of other things that are worth mentioning like confronting the idea that religion is just 'made up stuff' which Yockey correctly states is a materialist interpretation. Well that depends on which religion, what aspect of that religion and what time or place - and whether your talking about plain sense or allegorical interpretation. Religion is about symbolism and metaphors first, spreading traditions second (the main way, there are others of spreading traditions) - many aspects where never supposed to be taken literally, atleast not by our ancient and pagan ancestors.

People would go through trials to see, understand and act in accordance with the natural world. Afterwards they would become one with human nature and begin to live it, in both belief and action as opposed to merely talk about it or adopt customs they don't understand.

According to Asatru: To observe the functions of natural law is to simultaneously understand honor and the will of gods - nature reflects the divine since it was made by gods and reflects their will, and the gods reflect nature. An example is honor, it creates a strong group of people through victory, valor/dominance, freedom, joy, good breeding, and natural selection become a group that can exercise self-determination. Another is archetypes found in nature, and the gods that symbolize archetypes. While rituals and prayer creates a connection that allows one to begin to embody the qualities or virtues of the gods in heart and mind.

Here a video that explains the reasoning behind it:

Heres a snippet of that video where they talk only about that:

An event might not have happened but it can still be true because it may reflect nature - like archetypes, ideas, concepts & mechanisms found in nature, human nature - behaviors/thoughts or virtues and a higher order of reality.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:49 PM.
Page generated in 0.14054 seconds.