|
August 27th, 2008 | #41 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 76
|
Yeah, that sort of makes my case for me. Churches in America have been co-opted by anti-White political interests...that is something that hostile regimes do to the people to defeat them. Somehow conflating the antics of 21st cent. apparatchiks with the ethical and political committments of say Carl Schmitt is perverse.
|
August 27th, 2008 | #42 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,046
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
August 27th, 2008 | #43 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 76
|
What exactly do you mean by this? Religion has obviously done ''something''. Even if you are a committed atheist you simply cannot deny that religion is inextricably bound up with political (i.e. power) activity. To claim that it is simply a superfluous quantity is to claim that the previous millenium was insignificant.
|
August 27th, 2008 | #44 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,633
|
Quote:
I've so often wondered: of the entirety of words available throughout the entirety of the human experience why has it been necessary to name the "receptacle in which the consecrated Host is exposed for adoration" with a word that only impinges upon the consciousness with its so-near homonyms "monster," "monstrous," "monstrosity," etc. Is this mere accident?
__________________
No way out but through the jews. |
|
August 27th, 2008 | #45 | ||||
Administrator
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
August 27th, 2008 | #46 | ||
Administrator
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
August 27th, 2008 | #47 | ||||
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 76
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
August 27th, 2008 | #48 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 76
|
|
August 27th, 2008 | #49 | ||||
Administrator
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Alex Linder; August 27th, 2008 at 03:53 PM. |
||||
August 27th, 2008 | #50 |
Administrator
|
Our people's traditions predate and subsume the weak, liberal, universal church. Whites existed before Paulism, and they will exist after it.
|
August 27th, 2008 | #51 |
Administrator
|
But seriously, go ahead and confirm your belief that men come back from the dead, Revisionist. It's funny how you're embarrassed to state your true beliefs straight out, and you must ALWAYS misconstrue and ludicrously caricature WN arguments in order to make your case. Some brains, no balls. That's your church, its intellectuals, and the reason it has yielded to first protestants, then jews, even though it had every single possible advantage in spades.
|
August 27th, 2008 | #52 |
Administrator
|
Your own argument works better against you: if there's more to the world that whirling atoms, and that cheap and dismissable biological reality, then you have no grounds for being a racist. The Pope, Jeboo, or the great Dog himself, can turn a nigger into a human as easily as a jew.
The difference between White men thinking clearly, which is racialism, and Catholicism, is that we don't demand reality-waivers to keep our dogmas in place. |
August 27th, 2008 | #53 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 76
|
Quote:
I can't remember who coined the phrase ''what begins in Russia, ends here'', but recently I have considered this line of thinking to be of some import...American WNs who are interested in facilitating ultimate victory would be well served to eschew their anti-clerical, New World prejudices for practical reasons. |
|
August 27th, 2008 | #54 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,046
|
Quote:
|
|
August 27th, 2008 | #55 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 488
|
And hey, everybody, let's not forget the constant use on VNN Forum (as well as the pages of The New York Times) of the misplaced qualifier, sometimes referred to as the misplaced modifier.
Imagine someone saying, "I ONLY drink scotch on weekends!" Taken literally this sentence means a persons drinks no water or other fluids on weekends, they drink only scotch. Almost certainly the speaker meant, "I drink scotch ONLY on weekends!" Notice how the correct use of the qualifier or modifier `only' completely alters the meaning of the sentence. When one makes a habit of the correct usage of qualifiers and modifiers it makes for much clearer communication. Best Regards to you all! |
August 27th, 2008 | #56 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 76
|
Quote:
Tell me again about how Jeffersonian democracy was a pro-White endeavor. |
|
August 27th, 2008 | #57 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 76
|
Quote:
Billy Wright was a Prot., but he made the point that he would kill in defense of the people with the full knowledge that he would be hellbound. |
|
August 27th, 2008 | #58 |
Administrator
|
I never said anything about that, but feel free to attribute your bugbears to me. Of course, we could say that under his system niggers were property. Under your system they're equals.
|
August 27th, 2008 | #59 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,046
|
Quote:
|
|
August 27th, 2008 | #60 |
Administrator
|
Good example of the problem with your ilk. You have no debate, just labels. Anyone you don't like is Enlightened, or some other. None of it means anything beyond you-dont-like-it.
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|