|
August 25th, 2008 | #1021 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Retardo:
"...and why he made a fuss about the alleged weight of the remains instead of comparing their volume with the volume of the pits?" What pits Roberta? How many? Where? What is "the volume" of these alleged pits? Priceless. |
August 25th, 2008 | #1022 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Let’s not forget what the cowardly, homosexual dullard has said:
Quote:
1/5th of the holocaust can be found in 12 "huge mass graves?" What are they waiting for? |
|
August 25th, 2008 | #1023 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
“During the work on the terrain, I found no mass graves.”
Polish investigator Zdzislaw Lukaszkiewicz admitting the uncomfortable truth in his summary of his Treblinka investigation. |
August 25th, 2008 | #1024 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Allegedly, according to deathcamps.org, the 1,120,000 murdered and "burnt" jews in Treblinka and Sobibor are buried in just 12 "huge mass graves." (What happened to grave #7 at Sobibor?)
Sobibor: http://www.deathcamps.org/sobibor/pic/sobibor.jpg Treblinka: http://www.deathcamps.org/treblinka/pic/bmap9.jpg But as we all know, even the jews have been forced to admit that the Polish investigator Zdzislaw Lukaszkiewicz admitted after excavating the "lazarette" pit that - "There were no human remains found." So deathcamps.org continues to claim that the Treblinka "lazarette" pit contains the remains of jews - when they know for a fact that the pit has been proven to be a fraud. Mmmmmm. I wonder if they're lying about the other "huge mass graves" also? What was it that Polish investigator Zdzislaw Lukaszkiewicz said again about the alleged "huge mass graves" of Treblinka? Oh yeah, now I remember: "During the work on the terrain, I found no mass graves." We have 12 alleged "huge mass graves" allegedly filled with the remains of 1,120,000 murdered and "burnt" jews. But in one - "there were no human remains found." So that leaves just 11 - 1/5th of the holohoax allegedly buried in just 11 "huge mass graves!" And allegedly, they know the exact location of all 11 of these alleged "huge mass graves," yet not so much as one single tooth has ever been proven to have been excavated from either site - out of an alleged 35 million! Mmmmmmm. |
August 26th, 2008 | #1025 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Know what, Mr. Gerdes, I’m getting the impression that you’re repeating your self-projecting invective and your self-defeatingly infantile and hysterical rhetoric – not to mention your imbecile, irrelevant and already answered questions – way too often even for the taste of your fellow true believers. Even they seem to be getting bored, judging by their apparent silence.
Instead of again repeating the good old "no mass graves" – crap and more of the same beaten lies and bullshit you have dished up many times before, I suggest you use the little brain matter inside your skull, for a change, and try to provide more or less consistent answers to my recent posts # 1011 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...postcount=1011 , in which I reminded you of what you should have done while I was on vacation in order to look a little bit less like the cowardly and obnoxious liar you have shown yourself to be throughout our discussions, # 1012 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...postcount=1012 , in which I (again) answered the repetitive questions that stinking liar Gerdes still claims I’ve run away from , # 1013 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...postcount=1013 , # 1014 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...postcount=1014 and # 1015 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...postcount=1015 . Especially answers to the still unanswered questions contained in those posts. One question I would especially like to see answered is the question at the end of my post # 916 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...&postcount=916 , which I reminded you of in my post # 955 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...&postcount=955 before going on vacation and in my post # 1011 after coming back: Quote:
I see three alternatives: Alternative # 1: We can bore the hell out of our audience with your endless "show me, show me" – yelling, your repetitive irrelevant questions and my yawning responses to both. Alternative # 2: We can let this discussion rest until more news from the current Sobibor investigations come in. Alternative # 3: We can do something productive in the meantime by taking a look at the questions I have asked you throughout this discussion and further questions I would like to ask you, questions related to the relevance of your demands, to the physical evidence we have looked at, to the documentary and eyewitness evidence I have shown and to the hypothetical scenarios other than mass murder that you believe in. From the point of view of our audience, I’d say Alternative # 3 is the most interesting. As concerns Greg Gerdes, Alternative # 1 is what he will choose if he decides to continue behaving like the lying coward he has so far shown himself to be, Alternative # 2 is the neutral choice and Alternative # 3 is the one he will choose if he should manage to overcome his cowardice and if he has a minimum of genuine interest in the historical events we have been talking about. So which of them shall it be, Mr. Gerdes? Alternative # 1 ? Alternative # 2 ? or Alternative # 3 ? While you consider your answer, I’ll go to Topix, where you seem to have again reported one of my posts for deletion, miserable coward that you are. Don’t you feel sick every time you look in the mirror, Mr. Gerdes? I certainly would if I behaved like you. But then, I have a certain sense of decency, which is something you lack completely. Readers are invited to check out the following posts on the Topix forum: # 968 http://www.topix.com/forum/history/T...H7P8C/p47#c968 # 969 http://www.topix.com/forum/history/T...H7P8C/p47#c969 # 1005 http://www.topix.com/forum/history/T...7P8C/p49#c1005 # 1012 http://www.topix.com/forum/history/T...7P8C/p49#c1012 |
|
August 27th, 2008 | #1026 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Here again are the unanswered questions about Sobibor that Roberta has run away from.
1 - On what EXACT date(s) was Michael Shermer physically in the Sobibor camp? 2 - Why does he refuse to reveal this date(s)? 3 - Are there photographs that prove he ever stepped foot in the camp? 4 - If so, then why does he refuse to release them? 5 - On what date can we expect Shermers report on his findings that resulted from his "firsthand investigation" of the camp? * Note: Contact information for the lying coward Shermer can be found at the bottom of this link here: http://www.vho.org/tr/2002/3/tr11shermer.html 6 - On what EXACT date(s) was Kola physically in the Sobibor camp? 7 - Why does he refuse to reveal this date(s)? 8 - Are there photographs that prove he ever stepped foot in the camp? 9 - If so, then why does he refuse to release them? 10 - Are there photographs of Kola actually excavating the alleged "huge mass graves?" 11 - If so, then why does he refuse to release them? 12 - Are there photographs proving that any human remains actually exist? 13 - If so, then why does he refuse to release them? 14 - What were the results of the analysis of those soil core samples that the jews claim are: "ashes of human bone and tissue for the light gray stuff, wood ashes for the black stuff and pure bone ashes or lime for the white stuff?" 15 - On what date can we expect Kolas report on his findings that resulted from his "excavation" of the 7 alleged "huge mass graves?" 16 - What proof is there that the "huge ash mountain" of Sobibor is actually comprised of human ash? 17 - Where are the photographs of the huge pit is that this "mountain of human ash" was dug out of? 18 - Why does the $100,000.00 - THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE reward go unclaimed? Roberta: “Actually I’m able to prove the existence of all of these mass graves by simply referring to Prof. Kola’s description. Proof is contained in Prof. Kola’s published report about his findings on site, and in the documentary and eyewitness evidence about the mass killings at Sobibor, which is compatible with Kola’s findings.” 19 - And where can we find this published report? 20 - Or did you lie about it being published? 19 - BTW Roberta, why do you keep running from the questions about the soil core samples of Sobibor? 21 - What do the frauds at the Sobibor Archaeology Project say those core samples are comprised of? 22 - Can you show us a single photo of a single "huge mass grave" of Sobibor - yes or no? BTW Roberta, have I ever told you that you're priceless? |
August 27th, 2008 | #1027 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Roberta (post #916):
Quote: "No photos of Prof. Kola in person doing excavation work have to my knowledge been published. However, I have been informed by the director of the Sobibor Archaeology Project, Mr. Yoram Haimi, that the photos shown under http://www.sobibor.edu.pl/angielska/...nia/index.html are related to Prof. Kola’s archaeological investigation in 2001. While no photographs are required to prove that the mass graves actually exist, the three photographs from the above-mentioned series obviously show substances taken with a core drill out of Sobibor mass graves, which are clearly distinguishable from the light brown soil of Sobibor." So the greasy jewbitch admits that she's been in contact with fellow greasball haimi. So why then does she not know the results of any analysis of said "substances taken with a core drill out of Sobibor mass graves?" Roberta: Quote: "I am not familiar at this moment with the results of such analysis, which have not been published. However, it seems reasonable to assume that if such analysis was done – which is probably the case – , the results confirmed my assumptions mentioned in answer B.3 above." Let's see the results of the analysis and lets see the photos of the other core samples. How many core samples were taken? Later in the same post: E. Quote: Originally Posted by Gerdes 9 - Show us proof that the "huge ash mountain" of Sobibor is actually comprised of human ash. Roberta: Quote: "The aspect of the substance that the mound consists of, which has a light gray coloration different from the light-brown color of the soil at Sobibor (see photos mentioned in answer B.3 above) suggests the accuracy of captions describing this mound as a mound consisting of or containing human ashes." Notice how the lying jewbitch is trying to imply that there have been core samples taken from the mound. Let's see the photos of these alleged core samples and lets see the results of the analysis of the alleged samples. Roberta: Quote: "...So does the associated documentary and eyewitness evidence proving that Sobibor was an extermination camp and that the bodies of the victims were disposed of by burning them, which is mentioned in my post # 777 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...&postcount=777 ." What burnt bodies? Where? Robeta: Quote: "...The conclusion that the mound in question is comprised of human ash is thus the conclusion that is borne out by all known evidence and belied by none. It is also the conclusion towards which various sources of evidence independent of each other converge. This convergence of various sources of evidence independent of each other, alone or together with the absence of any evidence to the contrary, is proof that the mound in question is comprised of human ash." Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!! Thank you Roberta. Have I ever told you that you're priceless? |
August 27th, 2008 | #1028 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
More from Roberta's post #916:
F. Quote: Originally Posted by Gerdes 10 - Show us were the huge pit is that this "mountain of human ash" was dug out of. Roberta: Quote: "The human ashes that the mound at Sobibor is comprised of may have been dug out of one of more of the pits discovered by Prof. Kola in 2001. They were probably brought to the surface by postwar robbery digging, which would mean it is impossible to determine which of the grave pits contained these specific ashes." So Kola discovered pits? Let's see them. Show us the pits that the alleged "human ash" was dug out of. Let's see the photos of the construction of the "huge ash mountain." |
August 27th, 2008 | #1029 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
More from Roberta's post #916:
"According to my last conversation with Yoram Haimi... Archaeological evidence is published for the purpose of enhancing scientific and historical knowledge and for everyone’s benefit. When the results of the current archaeological investigations are published in a scientific magazine, they will include much more than just the evidence necessary to meet the NAFCASH challenge requirements. And I will see to it that Mr. Gerdes gets a free copy of the scientific magazine in which this evidence shall be published." Let's see proof of the "charred human remains and under them remains in a state of decay" allegedly found at Sobibor. After all, it would "enhanc scientific and historical knowledge and for everyone’s benefit." |
August 27th, 2008 | #1030 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Some keyboard claptrap from the retarded jewbitch's post #953:
Roberta: Quote: "Under number 3 I am saying that the samples were probably analyzed in order to confirm that they contain what their aspect suggests. I’m not categorically stating that such analysis, if done, confirmed that these samples contain human remains (though this was what the analysis probably did). Yep, until the results of Prof. Kola’s 2001 investigation are published, one can only presume that he did the analyses one would expect a competent professional archaeologist to do. I just consider it reasonable to assume that such confirmation was obtained, because a) the aspect of the samples suggests the presence of human remains, * - What human remains? Show us these alleged human remains. b) Prof. Kola is known to have identified mass graves at Sobibor and these samples are from his investigation and *What mass graves? Show us these alleged "huge mass graves." c) a competent professional archaeologist – which previous work by Prof. Kola has shown him to be – can be expected so have such samples analyzed." * - Really? Then answer the following questions: Were the samples analyzed or not? If not, why? If yes, let's see the results. Some keyboard claptrap from the retarded jewbitch's post #954: Roberta: "I might add that I don’t know what the members of the Sobibor Archaeology Project say about the composition of these samples. In my last phone conversation with Yoram Haimi, I forgot to ask this question. I shall ask it next time we speak." So what was the greasy jews answer? Why is Roberta running away from these questions? She has the contact information to easily answer them. In fact, she has already admitted that she's been in contact before with the people who can answer these questions. We're waiting Roberta. |
August 27th, 2008 | #1031 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
(November 23, 2001) Mass Graves Found at Nazi Polish Death Camp
Quote: WARSAW (Reuters) - Polish archaeologists excavating the Nazi death camp in Sobibor said they have found mass graves at the site. The excavations could provide valuable new evidence on the number of victims.“We uncovered seven mass graves with an average depth of five meters. In them there were charred human remains and under them remains in a state of decay” archaeologist Andrzej Kola was quoted by the Polish PAP news agency telling a news conference. He said the largest grave measured 70 by 25 meters, the others 20 by 25 meters. Wladyslaw Bartoszewski, a former Polish foreign minister said -“it is vital to gather evidence to refute the claims of those seeking to deny the Holocaust,” adding -“The work will continue - we have to confirm scientifically that this camp existed.” Let’s take a closer look at this alleged archeological finding at Sobibor. We have 7 alleged “huge mass graves” - 6 measuring 20 x 25 x 5 meters and one 70 x 25 x 5 meters. So each of the smaller graves has a volume of 2,500 sq. meters, with a combined total volume of 15,000 sq. meters and the largest of these alleged "huge mass graves" has a volume of 8,750 sq. meters - for a grand total of all 7 graves being - 23,750 sq. meters. This would mean then that the largest alleged “huge mass grave” would comprise 36.84% of the total alleged volume of all graves combined. So, if the alleged death toll of Sobibor is 250,000 and 36.84% of 250,000 is 92,100, then that means that the largest alleged “huge mass grave” of Sobibor would contain the remains of 92,100 jews. Now, 1% of the alleged mass murder is of course 2,500 and that amount would be only 2.714% of the total number of those alleged to be buried in said “huge mass grave.” Which begs the questions: Just how hard would it be to identify and quantify only 2.714% of the alleged contents of a single “huge mass grave” that allegedly contains the “charred human remains and remains in a state of decay” of 92,100 people? And why - 7 years after Kola’s press conference - has this not been done yet? What happened to the jews pledge to “confirm scientifically that this camp existed?” Allegedly, the remains of 92,100 jews in a “huge mass grave” measuring 70 x 25 x 5 meters were located 7 years ago, yet to this day, not an iota of proof has surfaced that confirms that so much as one body has been proven to exist. In fact, not so much as a single tooth has ever been proven to have been found at Sobibor. Why can't the greasy jews prove the existence of these alleged "huge mass graves?" Can anyone show us a single photo of a single "huge mass grave" of Sobibor? Yes or No? |
August 27th, 2008 | #1032 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
In my previous post on this thread (# 1025 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...postcount=1025 ), I wrote the following:
Quote:
Quote:
Bravo, Mr. Gerdes! You always do exactly what I expect you to do. Your predictability is one of the qualities that make you such a priceless demonstration object of "Revisionist" misery. Your limited intellect, and the accordingly limited repertoire that restricts to repeating the same trash over and over again, is another of those qualities. But I’ll give you another chance, nice guy that I am: My having answered to all your questions to the best of my current knowledge, the question arises what we should do with our discussion until further information from the current archaeological work at Sobibor comes around. I see three alternatives: Alternative # 1: We can bore the hell out of our audience with your endless "show me, show me" – yelling, your repetitive irrelevant questions and my yawning responses to both. Alternative # 2: We can let this discussion rest until more news from the current Sobibor investigations come in. Alternative # 3: We can do something productive in the meantime by taking a look at the questions I have asked you throughout this discussion and further questions I would like to ask you, questions related to the relevance of your demands, to the physical evidence we have looked at, to the documentary and eyewitness evidence I have shown and to the hypothetical scenarios other than mass murder that you believe in. From the point of view of our audience, I’d say Alternative # 3 is the most interesting. As concerns Greg Gerdes, Alternative # 1 is what he will choose if he decides to continue behaving like the lying coward he has so far shown himself to be, Alternative # 2 is the neutral choice and Alternative # 3 is the one he will choose if he should manage to overcome his cowardice and if he has a minimum of genuine interest in the historical events we have been talking about. So which of them shall it be, Mr. Gerdes? Alternative # 1 ? Alternative # 2 ? or Alternative # 3 ? |
|||
August 27th, 2008 | #1033 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Allegedly, according to deathcamps.org, the 1,120,000 murdered and "burnt" jews in Treblinka and Sobibor are buried in just 12 "huge mass graves." (What happened to grave #7 at Sobibor?)
Sobibor: http://www.deathcamps.org/sobibor/pic/sobibor.jpg Treblinka: http://www.deathcamps.org/treblinka/pic/bmap9.jpg But as we all know, even the jews have been forced to admit that the Polish investigator Zdzislaw Lukaszkiewicz admitted after excavating the "lazarette" pit that - "There were no human remains found." So deathcamps.org continues to claim that the Treblinka "lazarette" pit contains the remains of jews - when they know for a fact that the pit has been proven to be a fraud. Mmmmmm. I wonder if they're lying about the other "huge mass graves" also? What was it that Polish investigator Zdzislaw Lukaszkiewicz said again about the alleged "huge mass graves" of Treblinka? Oh yeah, now I remember: "During the work on the terrain, I found no mass graves." We have 12 alleged "huge mass graves" allegedly filled with the remains of 1,120,000 murdered and "burnt" jews. But in one - "there were no human remains found." So that leaves just 11 - 1/5th of the holohoax allegedly buried in just 11 "huge mass graves!" And allegedly, they know the exact location of all 11 of these alleged "huge mass graves," yet not so much as one single tooth has ever been proven to have been excavated from either site - out of an alleged 35 million! Mmmmmmmmmm. Now Roberta, you've accepted THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE. Let's see proof of the "charred human remains and under them remains in a state of decay" allegedly found at Sobibor. What are you waiting for Roberta? Answer the questions - bitch. |
August 28th, 2008 | #1034 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
This is going to send the dullest of the dull into one of his famous, hysterical carpet-biting fits.
New on the nafcash ( http://www.nafcash.com/ ) site: NOTE: If you lack the courage to accept the above facts and you want to continue to deny the truth about the “holocaust,” the “final solution” and the “pure extermination centers,” then the ball is in your court. The supporters of THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE TM have put their money where their mouths are and it’s time for the criminally fraudulent holocaust industry, their mealy-mouthed “skeptical” minions, their bought whores in the media and their servile Judas-Goats in our government indoctrination centers to put up or shut up. And to further illustrate just what utter frauds Michael Shermer, Andrzej Kola and the members of THE SOBIBOR ARCHAEOLOGY PROJECT are, NAFCASH TM will consider, for the purpose of laying claim to THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE TM, that Sobibors fraudulent “ASH MOUNTAIN” is one of the alleged “huge mass graves.” This means of course, that this “huge mass graves” exact location and exact dimensions are already known! So you only need to prove that it contains the remains of 2,500 people. What could be easier to do - IF - the claims about this “huge mound of human remains” are true? Now there is no need to wait on Kolas alleged report! What are you waiting for dull one? |
August 29th, 2008 | #1035 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Back to your old lies re "no mass graves" (see exhibits A.3.1.3 and A.3.1.4 in my post # 172 under http://206.41.117.128/showpost.php?p...&postcount=172 ) and "no teeth" (see exhibits A.3.1.1 and A.3.1.6 in the same post) at Treblinka, Mr. Gerdes? You’re as predictable as you’re boring, my friend. The pit 7.5 meters deep containing lots of human remains, which is described in Lukaszkiewicz' site investigation report of 13 November 1945, can only have been a former mass grave. This means that when Lukaszkiewicz wrote that he found "no mass graves", he meant to say that he found "no mass graves full of stinking dead bodies". What he did find was at least one mass grave containing partial remains of human bodies. And he found an area of 20,000 square meters covered by ashes, bone fragments and other partial remains, which can only have been the area of the Treblinka "death camp" section that had contained the mass graves. We've been there before, haven't we? The mass grave by the "Lazarett" may not even have been located during the Lukaszkiewicz’ investigation. Or then it was completely cleared out during the camp’s dismantlement and then turned into a deeper pit to bury useless objects in. We have also been there before, haven’t we? As to the maps featured by deathcamps.org, I didn’t know they are claimed to be fully accurate representations of the camp layouts including the number and size of the mass graves. What made you conclude they are claimed to be that? And as concerns the contents of the Sobibor mass graves, an archaeologist's public statement in conjunction with the known documentary and eyewitness evidence to large-scale mass murder at Sobibor is proof enough. If you want further details you’ll have to wait for the results of ongoing archaeological research by the SAP. Archaeologists work according to their own schedules regardless of how often a hysterical retard yells "let’s see", you know. And I don’t give a damn about your hysterical yelling either. What I’m waiting for, you ask? I’ll tell you in my next post. |
|
August 29th, 2008 | #1036 | ||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
What I'm waiting for, the self-projecting hysteric asks? Let’s see … I’m waiting for time and means to go to Sobibor, obtain permission to disturb the ash heap (which I doubt will be granted) and enlist the services of an expert to analyze the human remains and certify that they are in fact human remains (which I also doubt anyone will do for just little me). So waiting for what comes of an assessment of the mass graves’ contents by the SAP and/or for a detailed report by Prof. Kola seems a more promising approach. I’m also waiting for Gerdes to take care of the tasks listed in my post # 955: Quote:
# 1011 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...postcount=1011 , in which I reminded you of what you should have done while I was on vacation in order to look a little bit less like the cowardly and obnoxious liar you have shown yourself to be throughout our discussions, # 1012 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...postcount=1012 , in which I (again) answered the repetitive questions that stinking liar Gerdes still claims I’ve run away from , # 1013 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...postcount=1013 , # 1014 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...postcount=1014 and # 1015 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...postcount=1015 . Especially answers to the still unanswered questions contained in those posts. As I also wrote in post # 1025, Quote:
|
||||||
August 29th, 2008 | #1037 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Retardo:
"This means that when Lukaszkiewicz wrote that he found "no mass graves", he meant to say that he found "no mass graves." Yes, I know Retardo. What else would - "I found no mass graves" mean? Retardo: "We've been there before, haven't we?" You mean I've proven that you're a lying P.O.S. on this matter? Why yes, we have. Retardo: "The mass grave by the "Lazarett" may not even have been located during the Lukaszkiewicz’ investigation." What a lying P.O.S. you are Roberta. We all know that Lukaszkiewicz admitted that he investigated this pit and concluded: "There were no human remains found." Retardo: "It was completely cleared out during the camp’s dismantlement and then turned into a deeper pit to bury useless objects in." Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. Have I ever told you that you're priceless Roberta? It appears you have your magic glasses on again. So please tell us dull one - What happened to the human remains that were removed from the lazarett pit? Give us the EXACT location that they were moved to and the PROOF that you have to back up your baseless allegation. (Shouldn't be hard for someone with magic glasses on.) Retardo: "I’m waiting for time and means to go to Sobibor, obtain permission to disturb the ash heap (which I doubt will be granted) and enlist the services of an expert to analyze the human remains and certify that they are in fact human remains (which I also doubt anyone will do for just little me)." Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!! So you now admit that Kola never took any core samples of the "ash mountain?" You lie so much Retardo, you've lost track of your many lies Retardo: "The aspect of the substance that the mound consists of, which has a light gray coloration different from the light-brown color of the soil at Sobibor (see photos mentioned in answer B.3 above) suggests the accuracy of captions describing this mound as a mound consisting of or containing human ashes." And my earlier response: "Notice how the lying jewbitch is trying to imply that there have been core samples taken from the mound. Let's see the photos of these alleged core samples and lets see the results of the analysis of the alleged samples." Roberta: Quote: "...The conclusion that the mound in question is comprised of human ash is thus the conclusion that is borne out by all known evidence and belied by none. It is also the conclusion towards which various sources of evidence independent of each other converge. This convergence of various sources of evidence independent of each other, alone or together with the absence of any evidence to the contrary, is proof that the mound in question is comprised of human ash." More from Retardo (with my earlier response): Roberta: Quote: "The human ashes that the mound at Sobibor is comprised of may have been dug out of one of more of the pits discovered by Prof. Kola in 2001. They were probably brought to the surface by postwar robbery digging, which would mean it is impossible to determine which of the grave pits contained these specific ashes." So Kola discovered pits? Let's see them. Show us the pits that the alleged "human ash" was dug out of. Let's see the photos of the construction of the "huge ash mountain." What are you waiting for Roberta? |
August 29th, 2008 | #1038 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Retardo:
"The pit 7.5 meters deep... can only have been a former mass grave... What he did find was at least one mass grave..." Notice that the dull one, despite Lukaszkiewicz's amission that: "During the work on the terrain, I found no mass graves," continues to insist that "at least on mass grave" was found. One. Where is this alleged "former" mass grave Retardo? EXACT location please. |
August 29th, 2008 | #1039 | |||||||||||||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Poor hysterical Gerdes, I got him carpet-biting mad again.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Or that he is perfectly conscious of this and deliberately ignored it, as becomes a compulsory liar like him. Quote:
I’m not denying that Lukaszkiewicz wrote this: Quote:
Alternatively, the mass grave of the "Lazarett" may have been cleared out during the camp’s dismantlement and then turned into a deeper pit for burying discarded objects. Either way, the fact that Lukaszkiewicz did not find human remains in this particular place doesn’t mean what Gerdes would like it to mean. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You contended that Lukaszkiewicz’ not having found human remains in a crater where he thought the "Lazarett" mass grave to have been means that there was no "Lazarett" mass grave. I pointed out that there are also other possibilities. You have to rule out these other possibilities (which is not done my demanding that I prove them, of course). Unless you can rule out these other possibilities, they must be considered as such. And given the eyewitness evidence to the shootings at the "Lazarett", which includes the depositions before a West German court of two shooters, both of whom were sentenced to lifetime imprisonment for their crimes, my alternative possibilities stand a far better chance of accurately explaining Lukaszkiewicz’ findings - to say the least - than your wishful thinking. But that’s all too hard for your tiny brain to understand, isn’t it? Quote:
Where am I supposed the have claimed that Kola took core samples from the ash heap, Gerdes? Exact quote, post number and link to that post, please. Quote:
Quote:
I already addressed the your presumably deliberate misreading of the first of my above quotes, in my post # 1014 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...postcount=1014 (emphasis added): Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Ah, and I’m also waiting for what I listed in my post # 1036 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...postcount=1036 . Especially an answer to this question: Quote:
|
|||||||||||||||||
August 29th, 2008 | #1040 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
Next he’ll probably freak out again and go messing around with what I wrote. Stay tuned, folks. Quote:
Exact location is the mass graves area of the former "death camp" sector of Treblinka extermination camp. More detailed coordinates are currently unknown to me. But as we’re at it, I just found more detailed coordinates for the Chelmno mass graves. Have a look under http://www.muzeum.com.pl/en/chelmno.htm# : Quote:
It wouldn’t surprise me at all. And neither would another round of the inevitable "let’s see some photos" – howling. Or will it be "how many ounces of crushed human bones"? |
||||
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|