|
|
|
Thread | Display Modes | Share |
September 18th, 2012 | #1 | |
Angry Shiksa
Join Date: May 2004
Location: the unholy land
Posts: 10,011
|
White GOP rep with adopted rainbow children chimps out on Planned Parenthood
http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2...y-killers?lite
Quote:
|
|
September 18th, 2012 | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,229
|
I support Dems over Repubs if only for Planned Parenthood. I think birth control should be FREE -- it's an excellent investment. the only people who should be reproducing here in the USA should be committed heterosexual White couples with no genetic defects and IQ's of at least 110.
Berf control is less messy than mass graves but ultimately accomplishes the same thing. I suspect there are eugenicists among the Democrats. |
September 18th, 2012 | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,749
|
This is why I don't like pro-lifers. They always bring up that nigger babies are being aborted and it's a "holocaust".
__________________
It’s time to stop being Americans. It’s time to start being White Men again. - Gregory Hood |
September 18th, 2012 | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Filthydelphia
Posts: 10,095
|
That Congresscritter should load up the family van....and drive it over a cliff.
|
September 18th, 2012 | #5 | |
Celebrating My Diversity
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: With The Creepy-Ass Crackahs
Posts: 8,156
|
Quote:
So, they end up lecturing jews and illiberals on their own bullshit, which usually defaults to niggers and 'holocaust'. It's nuts. They can't win that way. You can't beat your enemies on their terms. Pro-lifers are almost all practicing Christians, and this tactic is very similar to the 'true jew' mentality in Christendom. Pro-lifers imply that they are the true illiberals. |
|
September 18th, 2012 | #6 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
September 18th, 2012 | #7 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
One of the most remarkable things I ever saw was a huge, I mean gigantic, pro-abortion rally in D.C. back in 1990 or 1992. There was a huge contingent of antis as well as the pros. Until then I had never thought about abortion much, and like most upper-middle-class-raised people, it was simply a matter of personal freedom and convenience, so far as I'd considered it. But seeing the pro-abortion, I just knew instinctively they were wrong. They're so stupid and shallow. It was the smug, stupid, deeply self-pleased (the quality I hate worst about the bourgeois is their almost tangible self-satisfaction) smile on Cybil Shepard's face as she and twenty others abreast carried the biggest banner up toward the speaking place at the Capitol. Pro-abortionists think at the level of women, and the worst sort of self-satisfied middle-class women. They simply aren't serious people. You could see why no sane society before the US ever allowed women to vote or in any way imagine they had political views anyone should listen to. Women are simply means of entertainment and reproduction, the last thing we need is to encourage them to think they can think or hold opinions. But the anti-abortionists are awful in their own way. Not as bad. They get the fundamental thing, which is that abortion is murder. But god are they contemptible. Bleating, crying, ugly religious women. Craze-eyed ex drunks turned jebus freaks, ill-dressed and ranting. Nuts jacking miniature crosses into the ground for all the poor scotched nigger eggs. Just inferior people, in the ordinary religious way: low-rent losers without taste, without brains, without anything but their ugly, ridiculous, lugubrious faith in leaking jebus, the jew who did took a stickin' for you. Truly a horrible event. Even worse, and these I truly wanted to kill, I mean just punch and kick and rip apart with my hands, were these dirty whirling Grateful Dead dancing college kids. They have this stupid dance. Both my parents passed on their bourgeois, hippie-hating genes to me, and the plasm ran true, these fucks I would gladly have participated in a one-man mass massacre of these scrawny disgusting bastards. Rip the peasant skirt off one of their mangy suspected females and tie it around the neck of four or five of their scruffy peach-bearded (always that HORRIFYING red-brown color) scrawny vaguely less femaleish companions and twist until this shitman teepee expired into collapse like a crop circle of human failure. Of course they supported abortion, and in their case they were total fifth-termers. I don't think killing Grateful Dead fans is any kind of a crime; if I were a dictator, it would be like a positive misdemeanor to expunge them wherever they cropped up. Like as many GD fanties as you could prove you dispatched, a prison chain gang would perform that many hours of community service yardwork at your house. They had their twelve-foot skeleton man. I can't go on, it's too horrifying. I wanted to attack them as badly as this cop was literally aching and hopping up and down wanting to beat me up once because I, drunk, ripped up his police tape outside a Major Sporting Event. The bottom line for me is, anything that gets rid of niggers and other muds is a good thing. I could care less what imaginary god and his all too real ugly stupid followers say about morality. But murdering white children in the womb is a crime. Honest to god, the only serious argument FOR aborting larval white children is...they don't have to join the world above. Ugh I mean god who would want to? I find my fellow humans mostly contemptible, and when I smell my own armpits, the stink is barely the less. Only someone as ugly, pathetic, ridiculous and weak-minded as your average christ cultists could believe THIS world was designed. It's the kind of concept that only makes people as ill dressed as your average christ cunt could possibly believe, o they of little taste. Last edited by Alex Linder; September 18th, 2012 at 09:54 AM. |
|
September 18th, 2012 | #8 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
|
Quote:
Add to that fact, that just because a White woman gets an abortion, we cannot assume that the chld she aborted was a White child. |
|
September 18th, 2012 | #9 |
Senior Member
|
Abortion and sterilization for the muds before they get deported. A eugenic program for Whites to bring up the quality of our race, and to weed out the scum infecting it at the moment.
|
September 18th, 2012 | #10 |
Administrator
|
The odd thing about women, which runs contraray to the parallelism we find throughout nature, where one thing, one relationship, suggests another thing or relationship, by way of analogy, is that they have the curviest bodies but the flattest minds. Among women's most distinctive mental features are how easily they're satisfied and how unimaginative they are. Their feminism is a paradox: it is 100% me-too. And to the small additional percent it's not that, it's simply lesbian perversity - uninteresting and insignificant. Feminists, being women, simply lack the brains to think out a female way of doing anything, all they can think is how women must copy men.
Feminism has gained women legal privilege over men, but apart from the comparatively small minority of women who can truly benefit from and want to do the Murphy Brown thing, it has been bad for women. Whatever true liberation there is in feminism is actually a product of material developments brought about by the market. This gives women more time. Which lets them develop their capacities. Which I, against the many reactionary proles in WN, believe is a good thing. Women can do more things than they did in traditional roles. But the feminists, 90% of them, don't have any respect for just how varied and skilled women were in those 'traditional' roles. There used to be a whole culture involved in being a woman. If you read anything out of the 19th century, or Victorian England, you see how advanced it actually was. Now this has been lost and a 'woman' is a third-rate man with a cell phone and a penis hole. Only Camille Paglia understands this, among the feminists. Women are better trying to be first-rate women than third-rate men. Which American institution is better off because of the participation of women? Do we have better voting? Better bureacracy? Are cops better? Are social services better? Is religion better with she-priests? Is politics better with twats? I thing all these institutions are worse. Manifestly, visibly and obviously inferior. Women are simply a politically created class used by our enemy, and the worst among their number, to advance an anti-White political agenda that calls for biggest government. Getting masses of women into the workforce is surely among the top ten scams of all time. It allows government to raise taxes to 50%, it destroys leisure time that could be used for sex, for family interaction, and for self-cultivation. Taxes are the price we pay for civilization, famously and foolishly claimed a prominent bureaucrat. That is the opposite of the truth. Money in private hands is generally well spent; money in government hands is usually deployed to do something unnecessary or destructive. Institutions filled with women, and which discriminate in favor of women, are symptoms of a civilization in decline. Wherever true progress is, true activity, will always be dominated by men, because women are creatures of inertia and followers of patterns set by others. Last edited by Alex Linder; September 18th, 2012 at 10:11 AM. |
September 18th, 2012 | #11 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
I'm just looking for something that's not contemptible. And not finding it! |
|
September 18th, 2012 | #12 |
Administrator
|
What I really hate about the probortionists is 1) as mentioned their smugness, God would I like to bitch-slap Cybil Shepard, but also 2) they try to have it both ways. Just say, yeah, we support murdering our kids in our wombs. Because it's convenient. But women aren't man enough to do that. They revert to their natural inclination to have things both ways. In this case, to murder their kids while dressing it up as something high and noble.
Women: at least they have pussies! There's really not a lot more to be said for 98% of them. |
September 18th, 2012 | #13 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
|
Quote:
|
|
September 18th, 2012 | #14 |
Administrator
|
Well, fucking is a skill. Only a small percentage of people are naturally great at it. People learn by imitating others. That is at least part of the fascination with porn. People who cannot communicate well, or who lack self confidence, are going to find sex more difficult than others. I remember reading somewhere that most people cannot look their partner in the eye when having sex. That is interesting and very suggestive. It's of a piece with everything else in our society being fake. We can't give our real opinion, because it's PC. We can't say what we actually think about anyone, because it might damage their self-esteem.
The Japanese have the right idea with the geishas, so far as I understand it, which is not that far. What I want is an ultra-minimalist government, with private people having the money and freedom to become cultured. For women, teach them how to fuck, how to cook, how to manage a household and work with a man, and how to keep their mouth shut. For the truly talented but tiny minority, go for it with your career, I don't mind that, I don't think most men do. The truth about 'patriarchy' is the opposite of what feminists claim. Men have oppressed women through history? Bullshit. All material civilization was built by men, and much of it in order to protect or provide for or impress women. And the tiny, tiny minority of female geniuses was almost invariably helped by the men nearest them, not hindered or oppressed. Feminism is mostly just jews and malocclusive gentile botches spreading lies and ingratitude to poison normal women, who would otherwise correctly perceive that men are the best things that ever happened to them. Last edited by Alex Linder; September 18th, 2012 at 10:21 AM. |
September 18th, 2012 | #15 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
|
Quote:
Last edited by Steven L. Akins; September 18th, 2012 at 10:40 AM. |
|
September 18th, 2012 | #16 | |
Commissioner of Sephardic
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dept. of Redundancy Department
Posts: 1,546
|
Quote:
__________________
Vote from the rooftops |
|
September 18th, 2012 | #18 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
If the only value a woman has is being inexperienced or what you call pure, then that's lost the first time. Can you really defile a woman more than once? Sex can have different levels. The religious view is that only a permanent committed relationship makes for legitimate sex. This view is factually wrong. Good things can come out of all kinds of sex, not just licit sex between married couples. But as with everything else the sordid cult puts out, it's view on sex is dogma, thus not susceptible to questioning. |
|
September 18th, 2012 | #19 |
Administrator
|
BTW, I was doing a Mencken, my bit to keep his way alive; he had some line about declining into his constitutent or component atoms, and I've always loved that idea, of our bitty molecules grouping, putting on a show, then quitting and recombining and worked some variation on that basic idea many times - that's what 99% of originality actually is. Mencken is the best English writer I've ever come across, and it's not close. He completed high school. Not a day of college.
"Education is important." It sure sure is. Last edited by Alex Linder; September 18th, 2012 at 11:50 AM. |
September 18th, 2012 | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
|
No, of course not; but what you alone do to a woman doesn't diminish her purity; it's what others do to them that lessens their value.
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|