|
July 15th, 2008 | #661 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 535
|
Bert, this pettifogging over reward money is a laugh. If you prove what no other can, international Jewry will reward you with tons of paper money; you will be lauded and hailed as the Messiah so get on with it.
__________________
Fear not the path of truth for the lack of those upon it.
|
July 15th, 2008 | #662 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
BTW Roberta, there's going to be one more major change in the next update.
I'm not happy about having to make it, but it will simplify things to the point that even a retard like you should be able to understand it all. But it will enable me to "lock in" pretty much everything that you will see on the site and address the ONLY REAL issue that you have complained about. |
July 15th, 2008 | #663 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,129
|
Ced:
Quote:
And if the jews really wanted to put an end to holocaust denial, the issue of money or any reward amount would be a moot point. So what are you waiting for Roberta? After all, you do want to be lauded and hailed as the Messiah by the jews - don't you? And just think, you would undoubtedly be given the title of Righteous Gentile! And what jewish toe sucking freak like you wouldn’t want all that? |
|
July 15th, 2008 | #664 |
Holorep survivor
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The wild frontier
Posts: 4,849
|
This thread really proves the Jewish stereotype exists for a reason.
As Hitler wrote: "The more I debated with them the more familiar I became with their argumentative tactics. At the outset they counted upon the stupidity of their opponents, but when they got so entangled that they could not find a way out they played the trick of acting as innocent simpletons. Should they fail, in spite of their tricks of logic, they acted as if they could not understand the counter arguments and bolted away to another field of discussion. They would lay down truisms and platitudes; and, if you accepted these, then they were applied to other problems and matters of an essentially different nature from the original theme. If you faced them with this point they would escape again, and you could not bring them to make any precise statement. Whenever one tried to get a firm grip on any of these apostles one’s hand grasped only jelly and slime which slipped through the fingers and combined again into a solid mass a moment afterwards. If your adversary felt forced to give in to your argument, on account of the observers present, and if you then thought that at last you had gained ground, a surprise was in store for you on the following day. The Jew would be utterly oblivious to what had happened the day before, and he would start once again by repeating his former absurdities, as if nothing had happened. Should you become indignant and remind him of yesterday’s defeat, he pretended astonishment and could not remember anything, except that on the previous day he had proved that his statements were correct. Sometimes I was dumbfounded. I do not know what amazed me the more; the abundance of their verbiage or the artful way in which they dressed up their falsehoods.
__________________
Secede. Control taxbases/municipalities. Use boycotts, divestment, sanctions, strikes. http://www.aeinstein.org/wp-content/...d-Jan-2015.pdf https://canvasopedia.org/wp-content/...Points-web.pdf |
July 15th, 2008 | #665 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 535
|
Quote:
Unctuous, reforming slime; permanently here to observe.
__________________
Fear not the path of truth for the lack of those upon it.
|
|
July 16th, 2008 | #666 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Hi EG,
Of all the instructively self-portraying trash you last produced, I found this part particularly amusing: Quote:
I have some questions for the bloodthirsty little thing: 1. Just how are "Revisionists" supposed to have "proven the Lie" ? How are "Revisionists" supposed to have proved that a sinister Jewish conspiracy manipulated or suppressed thousands of documents, trained thousands of false incriminating eyewitnesses (apparently chosen for the telepathic capabilities, which would keep them from straying too far from what their colleagues had said even if they had no way of hearing or reading it), coerced or otherwise induced a couple of thousand indicted perpetrators, especially before West German courts, into falsely incriminating themselves, silenced all potential exonerating witnesses throughout Europe and the rest of the world, fooled governments and other administrative authorities, criminal justice authorities and historians and demographers all over the world (unless, of course, you want to tell us that all these people were in the pay of said conspiracy) and brainwashed or otherwise induced millions of non-victims living in Israel, the US and other countries into concealing their origins and identity so it could be claimed that they had been murdered (also considering that these millions therefore had to renounce to compensation claims against the German government - the conspiracy must have paid them better)? Let's see the proof, baby. And it better be beyond reproach or question. 2. If the answer to question 1 should be that "Revisionists" have not actually "proven the Lie", what doubt are they supposed to have created, and how and why is this doubt supposed to be reasonable? 3. a) What would you accept as "proof based on logic" that Nazi genocidal policies caused the death of at least 5 million Jews during World War II? b) What rules or standards of evidence you can show us are your requirements based on? c) In what respect is the converging documentary, eyewitness, physical and demographic evidence that has led criminal investigators and historians to conclude on the factuality of this genocide supposed to be anything other than "proof based on logic"? d) What events in history that you accept as factual do you consider to have been demonstrated by "proof based on logic", and how is the proof that convinced you of the factuality of these events supposed to differ from the proof that has convinced criminal investigators and historians of the factuality of the Nazi genocide of the Jews? I'm waiting for your answers to these questions, sweetheart. Not exactly with baited breath, but I expect the answers to be fun. |
|
July 16th, 2008 | #667 | |||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
July 16th, 2008 | #668 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Let's assume I have published proof objectively meeting the challenge requirements in SKEPTIC or ARCHAEOLOGY magazine and am therefore entitled to lay claim to the reward. I then submit my evidence to the consideration of NAFCASH. I send them all reports by archeologists or forensic experts, drawings, photos, video clips, GPR surveys etc. that I have collected, together with a letter formally requesting payment of the reward to a given account. The elements I submit meet the challenge requirements, i.e. (to simplify things, I'll talk only about the main challenge now) they prove beyond a reasonable doubt the exact location and exact dimensions of a given mass grave at Chelmno, Belzec, Sobibor or Treblinka and that this grave contains human remains corresponding to at least 1 % of the estimated number of victims of these camps according to the Encyclopedia of the Holocaust. With that submittal, I shall have a legally valid and enforceable claim to the reward. The association NAFCASH, validly represented by Mr. Greg Gerdes, and the supporters XYZ of the NAFCASH challenge, undertake the legally binding commitment that, in case the conditions described in the previous two paragraphs are met, they will pay me the net amount of 100,000 US dollars. The association NAFCASH and each of the challenge supporters shall be jointly and severally liable to this effect. The implications of this legally binding commitment are that, if NAFCASH and the challenge supporters should fail to pay the reward, despite all conditions for payment having been complied with (and I frankly don't give much for the "character" of either Mr. Gerdes or any of the challenge supporters), I can sue them or any of them (as they are jointly and severally liable) before a competent court of law and obtain from that court of law an award whereby the respondent or respondents must pay, lest a court executor pawns their assets and sells them in an auction to the extent required for satisfying my claim. Is the above correct, Mr. Gerdes? YES or NO ? If the answer is YES, then the NAFCASH challenge is a fairly honest challenge. If the answer is NO, this means that whether or not I get paid upon submitting to NAFCASH proof that objectively meets the challenge requirements, following publication of such proof in SKEPTIC or ARCHAEOLOGY magazine, depends on whether or not the supporters of the challenge are actually the "people of character" Gerdes claims they are (which I strongly doubt). If these people are a bunch of charlatans like Gerdes (which is what you usually find in the "Revisionist" scene), that means tough luck for me. I shall have invested much time and money into collecting proof that objectively meets the challenge requirements (apart from travel and lodging expenses for trips to and inside Poland, I don't think archaeologists, forensic experts and GPR professionals work for free, and one must probably also pay fees for official permissions to conduct archaeological investigations) and not recover a cent of my expenses. Suing NAFCASH and/or the challenge supporters won't help me, as neither of them ever undertook a legally binding commitment to pay the reward if the stated requirements for claiming it are met. And this, of course, is final confirmation (if that were still necessary) that the NAFCASH challenge is a rip-off, a hoax, a mendacious publicity stunt meant to impress suckers, and nothing more than that. So what is your answer to my above questions, Mr. Gerdes? Is it YES? Or is it NO? |
|
July 16th, 2008 | #669 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 535
|
Quote:
__________________
Fear not the path of truth for the lack of those upon it.
|
|
July 16th, 2008 | #670 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
|
|
July 16th, 2008 | #671 |
Member
|
The Mule wouldn't bother to chat up a prostitute - she would tire of the verbose, long-winded financial negotiations and likely just beat him or stab him and take his wallet and any jewelry he might be wearing.
Any normal and decent woman would not be as violent as a prostitute, if she even bothered to allow the Mule near her, the moment he started talking, she would excuse herself to the pub or restaurant ladies' loo and instead go to the kitchen, leaving out the back door. The Mule would not even notice she had ran off, either, for he would be sitting at table, chatting himself up, debating himself, convincing himself to go on a date with himself... |
July 16th, 2008 | #672 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 535
|
You have to be carefull of women who approach you; they might be pushy and oblivious or desperate actresses.
__________________
Fear not the path of truth for the lack of those upon it.
|
July 16th, 2008 | #673 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
|
|
July 16th, 2008 | #674 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
|
July 16th, 2008 | #675 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
|
|
July 16th, 2008 | #676 | |
Member
|
Quote:
There's an old rule of thumb, one person's view represents 100 others, and those 100 others represent 1,000, and those 1,000 represent - well, you get the idea - at least you should, it's what jewish advertisers and corporations rely upon when deciding which product will sell and make the most money - consumer opinion or belief in advertising is essential before production of any product - too bad you holocaustians and the juden did not consider this when the Lie was being concocted and produced for mass consumption - after all, it was only a matter of time, and quite predictable that you all would be exposed for lacking truth in advertising. When I told you there are millions of Folks my age, White and non-white Gentiles that are not only skeptical of Holocaustianity, they are also indifferent to it or outright deny the claim altogether, I was telling you the truth. Whether or not they are aware of it, it is the work of Revisionists that have created the very reasonable doubt, that your "high court" of jews have failed to convince due to lack of Evidence. Now, go ahead, reproduce your varied huge blurry and doctored fotos of skulls and bones and such - and btw, I would like for you to explain to me whether or not that bicycle in one foto is also considered to be a jewish holocaust victim as well. Last edited by EireannGoddess; July 16th, 2008 at 06:31 AM. |
|
July 16th, 2008 | #677 | ||||||||||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Ah, and of course fear of eventual further questions is as piss-poor an excuse for not providing substantiation as I can think of. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||||||||||
July 16th, 2008 | #678 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Now, are your above babblings supposed to answer my questions in post # 666 (if so, they're as piss-poor, hysterically unreasonable and meaningless a response as I can think of), or are they just meant as a sermon to reassure yourself and the rest of the flock of your common faith? As a sermon your babblings are quite entertaining. |
|
July 16th, 2008 | #679 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
|
Quote:
Looks like a NO to me, but please correct me if I should have misunderstood you. I'm not waiting for anything, by the way. It's just fun to explore your mendacity and cowardice while other things are going on. |
|
July 16th, 2008 | #680 | |||
Member
|
[quote]
Quote:
Quote:
When it comes to you, I simply do not have the time nor desire to wade through your replies were I do address you seriously; full of convolutions, repetitive statements, each worded differently but saying the same thing as is your wont; nor am I interested in your veering off into some holocaustian religious trance and being subjected to revelations that, which would surely be of a completely different topic - if only to avoid Herr Gerdes posts. No, I will not give you that. Quote:
|
|||
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|