Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old June 4th, 2009 #61
Bosse
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 94
Default Amazing TJB in Sweden (the jews may have gone to far this time)

One of our biggest tvchannel here in Sweden tv4 owned by jews (Bonnier family) have moved the "nollrasismen"(zero-racism) propaganda day to our nationalday! They may have gone to far this time becaus alot of people on the internet has started to understand the jew and how he works against us Swedes.

On this site you can see a preview of there antiwhite advert-movie about this Zero-racism day on tv4

http://www.dagensmedia.se/mallar/dag...version=239134

Its about a white out of shape,small and dumb guy playing tennis against a strong and fit nigger. The judge that is white is cheating so that the white can win. And it ends with the quote "In reality its not a game"
 
Old June 4th, 2009 #62
Kievsky
Senior Member
 
Kievsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,229
Default

I watched it. Can you translate the comments for us?

That's very interesting how the jews are making our point for us. We don't have to jump up and down and point out "jew jew!" they do it for us!
__________________
Godzilla mit uns!
http://mindweaponsinragnarok.wordpress.com
 
Old June 4th, 2009 #63
Tom McReen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,544
Default

They have definitely gone too far, it's like they want a fight but we know how they will react if we say who is behind it.

Why not comment? I did. I didn't name the jew because I wanted to get a point across first.

I may return bearing the name JEW.
__________________
'We live in a world defined by the jewish media' - Geoff Beck, TTIND.

'Gentiles are supernal garbage' - Rabbi Schneur Zalman, founder of Chabad-Lubavitch.
 
Old June 4th, 2009 #64
Douglas
Racial Socialist
 
Douglas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,302
Default

What does this say?

I don't get it.

in accomplishment am failing the none play

 
Old June 4th, 2009 #65
varg
...
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 9,741
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bosse View Post
One of our biggest tvchannel here in Sweden tv4 owned by jews (Bonnier family) have moved the "nollrasismen"(zero-racism) propaganda day to our nationalday! They may have gone to far this time becaus alot of people on the internet has started to understand the jew and how he works against us Swedes.

On this site you can see a preview of there antiwhite advert-movie about this Zero-racism day on tv4

http://www.dagensmedia.se/mallar/dag...version=239134

Its about a white out of shape,small and dumb guy playing tennis against a strong and fit nigger. The judge that is white is cheating so that the white can win. And it ends with the quote "In reality its not a game"
Bosse check out some of the jewish, anti white propaganda our media shows here:

http://www.vnnforum.com/video.php?do...&categoryid=19
 
Old June 4th, 2009 #66
varg
...
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 9,741
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Douglas View Post
What does this say?

I don't get it.

in accomplishment am failing the none play

Bosse already translated that "In reality its not a game"
 
Old June 4th, 2009 #67
Bosse
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 94
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kievsky View Post
I watched it. Can you translate the comments for us?

That's very interesting how the jews are making our point for us. We don't have to jump up and down and point out "jew jew!" they do it for us!
I will do my best to translate some of the comments...Can you feel the wrath of the goys? zero positive comments ! people here just had enough of this shit.


HAMMARN, torsdag 4 juni 2009:
good tv4, Now you got me to be more against the immigration and your multiculturalism
Where is this poor country hedding when politics and media are made up of idiots.

VIGGE, torsdag 4 juni 2009:
Go Bonnier Family!! You always succeed to destroy everything, congratulation.

WFGWEGWEGWE, torsdag 4 juni 2009:
to sum up this movie: offensive.

DETDU, torsdag 4 juni 2009:
TRASH!

TOLV, torsdag 4 juni 2009:
Soon the bonnierwall shall be built around Husby and Fittja. All non-Jews will be required to travel documents and permits from the Bonnier family to have to travel somewhere.
They will do it to protect themselves against a possible evil people who do not share their god beliefs.
There will also be supported by the U.S., Carl Bildt and Halliburton

BONNIER, onsdag 3 juni 2009
I feel sick. Goddamn you, TV4.

ARG, onsdag 3 juni 2009:
What are you doing TV4? Now I am almost racist so angry I become. Hold on and pushing ordinary people ON NATIONAL DAY! Shame! TREASON!
We have no problem with racism in Sweden.
We have problems with multicultural.


DDT., onsdag 3 juni 2009:

Here a good movie.



SVENSKFIENTLIGHET, onsdag 3 juni 2009:
Tv 4 you are hell most racist, if you are bad at math, you can not use your communication unites service. You are therefore, unlike in humans, who may use and those who do not receive. In addition, black paint us Swedes and the Swedes are trying to make us like idiots, fat and racist. Your propaganda is the worst I have seen, you are showing WT program on TV where the Swedes embarrass themselves.

SVT is much better than you and you can forget that I intend to look at one of your channels on TV.

SKITIDETDU, onsdag 3 juni 2009
Fortunately, I think that propaganda has the opposite effect. So damn tiring to hear about this "racism" the whole damn time.

Burn in hell Scherman & TV4


RÄDDA SVERIGE, onsdag 3 juni 2009:
Propaganda is in full swing. They are not satisfied until every Swedish woman has racedmixed children. Swedish men will die of course too!


GENOCIDE! GENOCIDE! GENOCIDE IS WHAT YOU BUSY WITH!


UN Declaration on Human Rights


Article 15
1. Everyone has the right to a nationality.

2. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change nationality



KARLSSON, onsdag 3 juni 2009:
When will the tribute videos to us white!?

Why will the tribute to black films, they have not contributed in the vicinity of as much as white!

EVILDICK, onsdag 3 juni 2009:
Was the nigger namned Svensson?
Tv4, Jewish-owned TV4, you are the most disgusting proponent of Swedish hostility in this country.
I say congratulations.
You embarrass yourselves with your embarrassing Swedish contempt.

ANDERS, onsdag 3 juni 2009:

How can you throw so much shit on white people? Look at all of civilization, culture, technology that they've contributed! Looking on the other hand, Africans south of the Sahara, it has been almost after uneaten.

Then if we look at statistics as 50% of all Africans are unemployed and have an over-representation of 600% in serious crimes (rape, murder, etc.)

Why this hatred against us white, which manages us so well, but all this tribute to black, then do not do it!

SILLEN, onsdag 3 juni 2009:

Delightful racist film Tv4. Suck dick Bonniers, you fucking racist pig!

BLUE HORSESHOE, onsdag 3 juni 2009:
I think it is good to have sponsored propaganda so that young people get a distorted picture of reality as early as possible.

Thank you, Scherman
 
Old June 4th, 2009 #68
Bosse
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 94
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by varg View Post
Bosse check out some of the jewish, anti white propaganda our media shows here:

http://www.vnnforum.com/video.php?do...&categoryid=19
Thank you for the link will look at it
 
Old June 4th, 2009 #69
Douglas
Racial Socialist
 
Douglas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by varg View Post
Bosse already translated that "In reality its not a game"
Well duh I obviously didn't read the whole post, the second I saw "antiwhite advert-movie" I went searching for the video.
 
Old June 4th, 2009 #70
Bassanio
Hath not a Goy eyes?
 
Bassanio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Venice
Posts: 4,287
Blog Entries: 6
Default

Quote:
How can you throw so much shit on white people? Look at all of civilization, culture, technology that they've contributed! Looking on the other hand, Africans south of the Sahara, it has been almost after uneaten.

Then if we look at statistics as 50% of all Africans are unemployed and have an over-representation of 600% in serious crimes (rape, murder, etc.)

Why this hatred against us white, which manages us so well, but all this tribute to black, then do not do it!
No kidding, especially considering that Sweden had nothing to do with slavery and colonialism.
__________________
The Goy cries out in ecstasy as the Jew strikes him.
 
Old June 4th, 2009 #71
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Jewish Media Control in Sweden and Finland

The logic is that all Gentiles criticizing Jews do so, always, without any real reason except for an irrational, pathologic hatred. These anti-Semitic Gentiles further blame Jews for all the bad things happening to them in the world. Well, what if we apply that logic to Jews, what do we have? Jews are constantly blaming Gentiles for being anti-Semitic whenever they are having any problems.

Jewish Media Influence in Sweden and Finland

Every now and then we get some really interesting evidence from readers of this web site. This was just emailed to us from a reader originally from Sweden. We hope the enlightened in other nations will find their way to us and research their own country's media apparatus, and who controls it.

This paradigm of Jewish dominance of mass media information sources is evidenced throughout the world, from the U.S. to Great Britain, from Brazil to Australia, from Poland to Peru.

Dear Sir,

First of all I would like to laud you for an exhaustive and well-prepared site. You have certainly gone through the Jewish question thoroughly before compiling your observations and analysis. Reading your This week's Jewish News as usual today there was one piece of news that made my face wreathed in smiles. The piece of news concerned how the Jewish community of Lithuania accused LNK television for anti-Semitism.

Well, the far too familiar irony is that the LNK, as stated in the article is owned by the Bonnier family, based in my country of origin, Sweden. Worth mentioning then is that the Bonniers are Jewish themselves. Bonnier is a taken name; originally the family was named Hirschel. Not only is the Bonnier family Jewish and not only do they own LNK, but they are the far most influential media group in Sweden and in Finland.

Of the seven largest daily newspapers in Sweden, the seven with a daily circulation of over 100,000, the Bonnier family owns four, Dagens Nyheter (the Daily News), Expressen (the Express), Sydsvenska Dagbladet (the Southern Swedish Daily News) and Dagens Industri (the Industry of Today). The largest of the private channels in Sweden is TV4. The Bonnier family directly holds 21,6% of TV4 and through their ownership of the Finnish based Alma media company they hold an additionally 23,4%, totalling up 45% and a virtual control. As head of TV4 we find the Jew Jan Scherman. Through Alma Media, Bonnier also controls MTV3, the most popular channel in Finland with 39,1% of the total viewing time (in 2001) and Subtv, the third largest commercial television channel in Finland, aiming mainly at young adults.

Apropos Finland, Bonnier also owns 23% of MTV in that country. In Finland, Bonnier also controls the leading daily Iltalehti and Kauppalehti, Finland's largest business media with a circulation of 85.000 per day. Bonnier also control the printing house Lehdentekijät, that produces 40 regularly published magazines in Finland. In addition to that they own five regional papers, 15 local papers and nine free-distribution papers in Finland alone. They further control the Baltic News Service, the leading news bureau in the Baltic region, providing the world with news about the Baltic with a Bonnier touch.

Beside the Bonnier family in Sweden there is the Jew Peter Hjörne (Kaplan), owner and chief editor of Göteborgs-Posten (the Gothenburg Post; GP), the fourth largest newspaper in Sweden with a circulation of 253,700, reaching 600,000 readers daily. GP is furthermore the only newspaper in Sweden's second city, Gothenburg. Hjörne is also the owner of two local newspapers, Bohuslänningen (32.400) and Strömstads tidning (5,200); both distributed in the Swedish north-west coast area. In addition he controls 22% of Liberala tidningars konsortium (the consortium of liberal newspapers) and thereby Nerike Allehanda (The eighth largest newspaper in Sweden with a circulation of 66,300), Motala tidning/Vadstena tidning (12,800), Bergslagsposten (10,600) and Nya Ludvika tidning (9,500). Finally he also holds 9% of Hallandsposten (31,000).

Hjörne is a part of the old Jewish establishment in Gothenburg and has his way to influence the Gentiles of that city. For instance, when the Jew Steven Spielberg¹s movie Schindler¹s List reached the screens Hjörne personally paid so all senior high school students would see it. The Bonnier family owns 30% and Hjörne owns 10% of The Swedish News-agency Tidningarnas Telegrambyrå (the Swedish Central News Agency), the mainly news source for the none-local news stories in most minor papers in Sweden.

The largest newspaper in Sweden is Aftonbladet (the Evening Post), jointly owned by the Swedish Labour Union and the Norwegian Schibstedt company. The chief editor, however, is the Jewess Helle Klein, great granddaughter of the former grand rabbi of Stockholm, Rabbi Gottlieb Klein. Her father, Ernst Klein, is influential in Swedish media as well. 1990-1999 he was the chief editor of Östgöta Correspondenten, the ninth largest newspaper in Sweden, and now he sits on its board. He furthermore is president of Svensk Presshistorisk Förening (Swedish association of press history).

Beside Klein there are several Jewish staffers working at Aftonbladet.

In other words, of the seven largest news papers in Sweden, six are either owned by or edited by Jews. And please note, there are fewer than 20,000 Jews in Sweden making up roughly 0.2% of the total population. Actually, I could go on and on describing the Jewish media influence in Sweden but I guess you see where I am heading. That LNK or Bonnier would be anti-Semitic is about the most ridiculous I have heard. Keep up the good work!

Regards, M

Lithuanian Jewish community blames LNK television for anti-Semitism

Interfax, October 23, 2003
"The Jewish Community of Lithuania (JCL) has demanded that the private TV channel LNK stop the "anti- Semitic propaganda" in its programs, JCL Chairman Simonas Alperavicius told Interfax on Wednesday. JCL has sent LNK's managers, Swedish media group Bonnier, which owns the station, and the Swedish media community an open letter saying that "the authors of the humorous program Dviracio Zynios (Bicycle News), pretending to engage in parodies, incites spectators against the Jewish people," Alperavicius said. This was especially clear in the program dealing with the September visit of Israeli Knesset Chairman Reuven Rivlin to Vilnius. "When the humorous issues of this TV channel concern the Jewish theme, a character parodying a Jew is always presented as a swindler or thief trying to get rich in a dishonest way - how long are we going to tolerate this?" Alperavicius said. Rivlin's statements in Lithuania "have evoked a tide of intolerance and anti-Semitism, and websites have seen over four thousand anti-Semitic remarks that were beyond any standards of civilized dialogue," he said. "In this situation, the escalation of negative stereotypes on a TV channel's programs could influence the state of mind in unhealthy people and encourage some politicians to make irresponsible statements or even verbal attacks against Lithuanian citizens of Jewish origin," the letter says. Israeli Knesset speaker Reuven Rivlin, during his September visit, was categorical about the responsibility of Lithuanians for slaughtering Jews during the Nazi occupation, which caused a controversial response. In particular, Seimas Chairman Arturas Paulauskas told Lithuanian radio that Rivlin's visit "was not something that could serve the improvement of our relations or better understanding of our positions."

M's Follow-up:

... [T]here is a Jew named Robert Aschberg in Sweden who wields a great lot of power in our media. He owns the largest production company in Sweden called Strix Television and produces programs for every major channel, especially TV3 where almost all programs that aren’t Hollywood produced sitcoms, talk shows (Ricky Lake and Jerry Springer) or bad movies comes from Strix. It was Strix by the way that first came up with the idea of the show Survivor, now broadcasted also in the USA. Aschberg himself is the head of several of these usually noisy and chaotic shows and has thus been called Sweden’s Michel Friedman. His maternal grandfather is the banker Olof Aschberg who helped finance the Russian revolution and his brother, Richard Aschberg, works at Aftonbladet (the Evening Post). Robert Aschberg is further an important financer of eXpo, a Swedish version of the ADL, while it however is not an exclusively Jewish organization.

To analyze the Jewish influence in Sweden is a delicate matter, much due to the fact that the influence in many regards is indirect ...

http://jewishtribalreview.org/sweden.htm
 
Old June 4th, 2009 #72
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

[It's not just the U.S. whose media are controlled by jews; it's Sweden, too.]

[A Swede writes us...]

Just wanted to say that the jews in sweden own the media to almost 100%. We have the Bonnier family ( http://www.bonnier.se/Default.aspx?epslanguage=SV ) that are very powerfull in the media. They have 150 companies and 12000 employes in 20 countrys.

Then we have Peter Hjörne another jew that owns Stampen AB ( http://www.stampen.com/ ). He own over 25 swedish newspapers and other companies linked to the media.

when Schildler's List came to Sweden the jew Peter Hjörne payed all 9th graders in gothenburg (2nd largest city in ) sweden to see that propaganda movie and yes I was one of them who was forced to see it.

And the biggest newspaper in Sweden Aftonbladet has a jewish Chefeditor in charge Helle Klein grandchild to Rabbi Gottlieb Klein.

Another jew in media is Robert Aschberg who owns Strix television that produces tvshow for big tvchannels in sweden. He is a big donar to Expo the swedish version of ADL.

There are only 20 000 jews in Sweden (0.2%) and still they controll almost all media. This pattern is the same all around white countrys.

The jews have started this mess in Sweden. They are only against muslims caus they fight back against them but dont care if savage african cristiams comes to Sweden. They controll every mind here we are far worse then any country in the world exept SA. White males have become girls and dress upp like faggots. Girls are like men and they love the niggers.

http://vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=742677&postcount=17
 
Old June 4th, 2009 #73
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Who Rules Sweden?

by Fredrik Haerne

June 24, 2002

CNN's website carried a headline yesterday declaring "Israel calls up reservists to fight terror," which means that the Israelis are going to occupy even more Palestinian territory. Do we even notice the distortion of the language anymore? I do, but I have a major advantage: I am not a U.S. citizen, and so the codewords used in American broadcasts haven't been hammered into my brain day after day. Instead I only see them when I access American newssites, and the codewords -- the Newspeak that George Orwell warned us about -- become more striking since we don't use them where I live. "Hate," for example, is still just one feeling among many to my fellow Swedes; it can be either good or bad, depending on what it is you hate - just like the value of your love or mistrust or anything else is dependent on the object of the emotion. Curious, then, to see "hate" being used as a Newspeak substitute for "pro-White" overseas. Would I notice the trick if it had been invented here in Sweden instead? I hope so.

This doesn't mean that we don't have Newspeak words of our own. Perhaps it is interesting to learn that we have our very own media oligopoly in Sweden, producing a result very similar to that in other European countries, and the United States. Perhaps some of you think that European media are freer than your own -- I used to think the same thing about the United States. The study Who Rules America? at the National Alliance website opened my eyes completely to the peril we face, and since then I have made a point of studying the media owners in my own part of the world.

Electronic media

When it comes to television the study is easy. Until the beginning of the nineties, the Swedish government had a complete monopoly on both television and radio, and they used this in a way you can expect from a socialist government - ruthlessly. I cannot emphasize enough how these media were used as a propaganda tool, enabling the Social Democratic Party to keep power nearly without interruption for seventy years. Decade after decade television hammered into Swedish minds the message that we lived in the best of nations, since we had the most socialist government of all Westerners, and therefore the best. The relative economic prosperity in the country was attributed to this, although our economy was in fact simply riding high on our being neutral in World War II (saving our industries from being blown to smithereens), combined with the natural result of the strong Nordic work ethic.

The consequences of this media control were sometimes appaling. During the Vietnam War, Swedes were whipped into an anti-American frenzy, and television's support for North Vietnam and communist dictatorships in general was hardly disguised at all. One scene especially comes to mind: the prime minister Olof Palme marching, torch in hand, together with a North Vietnamese representative in a pro-Viet Cong rally, causing the United States to close its embassy in Stockholm. Palme, this greasy, arrogant Estonian socialist, knew he could do whatever he wanted: television was his loyal cheering section every day of the year.

This doesn't mean people couldn't choose what to watch; oh no, they had Channel One and Channel Two! The difference between them was...err...well, they had different logos at least. Funnily enough, they both had their own news broadcasts, giving Swedes a delightful choice between two waiters serving the same dish.

And yet, nothing good lasts forever. The first satellite dishes struck fear into the hearts of all orthodox socialists, and the Party had serious discussions about how to deal with this new threat. The problem was clear: for the first time Swedes could listen to news from abroad! The horror! The children might even start watching entertainment that was not to fifty percent indoctrination (like the Swedish saying goes: it must be bent in time, that which crooked shall be). The possibility of banning the dreadful dishes was seriously discussed, and abandoned only with great angst, falling on its own absurdity.

The Party was in luck, however. The only other news broadcasts in Sweden today are found at the privately owned TV 3 and TV 4. TV 3 is owned by super-capitalist Jan Stenbeck, who to date has shown no other aspirations in life than to produce the trashiest entertainment possible. His news program is a joke, and the rest of the time the channel simply broadcasts whatever it can get at a cheap price from Hollywood. Stenbeck also controls ZTV, a Swedish version of MTV. Both are exactly the same, with the announcers at ZTV trying hard to look like their better-paid colleagues at Redstone's corporation.

TV 4, on the other hand, has some aspirations to quality, which doesn't help us much since this is the Jew's playground. Its main shareholders are the Jewish Bonnier Family and the Finnish media group Alma Media. A quick look at Alma Media's website reveals its largest shareholder by far to be - Bonnier, as luck would have it.

Finally, Channel Five, owned by the Belgian SBS Group, which owns TV and radio channels all across Europe. Its Chairman is Harry Sloan, a Gentile, but its Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is Michael Finkelstein, a Jew and U.S. citizen.

If you pay for cable, you will have the privilege of watching Canal+. This movie channel and many other are owned by Vivendi, a Parisian-based entity that happens to be Europe's largest media corporation. Its largest shareholders are the Jews in the Bronfman family, and at least seven of its directors are Jews. It wasn't always like this, but it is now.

Now for a quick look at the radio business. The conservative parties won the election in 1992, because of the economic crisis that had started a year earlier, and they took the opportunity to auction off broadcasting rights before the socialists regained power. Unfortunately, most of these rights were bought by the large media conglomerates, so radio is basically a mirror of television.

A sidenote: the socialist media and the state-controlled schools worked non-stop at making it appear that the economic crisis was the conservatives' fault, and most people, having a memory like a goldfish, believed them after a while. Today very few remember that the crisis actually started a year before the conservatives came to power, and you need to show very precise evidence to convince people of this fact. A valuable demonstration of the power of television.

Perhaps television's power will be even stronger in the future. Let us have a look at the Ministry of Culture: its boss is Lena Hjelm-Wallén, a hard-core feminist and former communist turned Social Democrat who was one of the stubbornest opponents of legalizing satellite dishes in Sweden. She is now using taxpayers' money to buy propaganda aimed at making us buy the "digital box," a device that would make it possible to view digital broadcasts.

The whole point of her effort is that the Ministry of Culture gets to decide which channels can use the digital box, with those favoring socialism getting the nod. Commentaries from those involved in the project reveal that they long back to the days when Channel One and Two reigned supreme, and could fill the ether with socialist intellectualism.

Unfortunately for the Ministry of Culture -- which, come to think of it, would be more appropriately named the Ministry of Propaganda -- the digital box hasn't sold very well, and not many media corporations have expressed the wish to submit to Hjelm-Walléns' feminist and leftist criteria. Few channels, few viewers, lots of tax money wasted. This won't do at all. True to form our former communist has demanded the right to heavily subsidize the digital box, meaning that since Swedes don't want to pay for it, we will be forced to pay for it.

Before we leave the ether waves I would like to say a few words about the movies and TV shows being made in Sweden. These are not kind words, so I won't say them after all, but instead describe the business. Understandably, with such a small domestic market this industry does not lead an easy existence. Hollywood dominates the distribution completely, and as I switch on my TV now I see...on Channel One, an early-century documentary for the retired; on Channel Two, a Star Trek episode; on TV 3, a movie about a dancing Negro; TV 4, another Hollywood movie; Channel Five, actually Fawlty Towers with John Cleese; ZTV and MTV, more dancing Negroes.

The only Swedish work, then, is the documentary on Channel One; the rest is foreign, mostly American. No, the domestic movie industry does not lead an easy existence, but many of its bosses do; showered with money by the Ministry of Culture, they are able to produce any pet project they want without much fear of running out of cash. Witness Ingmar Bergman. If you have heard of this particularly boring and self-centered director, maybe you have been led to believe that Swedes enjoy his work. Let me assure you, we do not. In fact, we hate the guy who has given us a reputation of being more-boring-than-death intellectuals abroad. Practically the only ones who like these so-called intellectual movies are the ones receiving our tax money for making them!

Printed media

Sweden has four newspapers that are sold nationwide: Expressen, Aftonbladet, Dagens Nyheter and Svenska Dagbladet. In a rough translation I am going to call these the Express, the Evening Post, the Daily News and the Swedish Daily. These newspapers have only three major owners: the Express and the Daily News belong to Bonnier, and the Evening Post and the Swedish Daily are owned by the large Norwegian media family Schibstedt. The Evening Post is also part-owned by the LO; more about that later.

Let us have a look at the Bonnier corporation's holdings. As I imagine this could be interesting to any North Europeans reading this, a list of Bonnier's newspapers and other companies can be found here:

http://www.bonnier.se/bilder/koncerntrad.gif

Good news for Zion: not only do the Bonniers own the Daily News and the Express, they also own Sydsvenska Dagbladet and Goteborgsposten ("GT" in the link above). These are the two largest regional newspapers. We also find the country's largest business magazine, Dagens Industri, on the list, along with several other goodies.

Neighbors reading this, take note: The Bonniers are interested in expanding to other countries, preferably as much as possible (says Carl Bonnier jokingly). Their purchases include Tammi in Finland, Business a.m. in Great Britain, Cappelen in Norway, Delovoj Peterburg in Russia, Dienas Bizness in Latvia, and Putz Biznesu in Poland, to name a few.

The socialist Evening Post is owned to 49.9 percent by Schibstedt, who are responsible for the management of the newspaper. The other 50.1 percent belong to the extremely powerful Land Organization, the LO, which is a labor union with strong ties to the Socialist Party. It goes like this: they donate huge sums of the members' fees to the Party each year, and in return the Party gives an even larger sum from the public treasury to the LO. The Party members cannot give this money directly to themselves, according to law, but it is legal to give it to independent organizations.

Also, the LO gains the right to actually force workers to join them. If those working at a particular company do not want to sign on to the LO-regulated terms for wages and working conditions, and give money to the LO for the privilege of doing so, the company will be put in a "blockade," where no other company with LO members in it is allowed to do business with it. An average of fifty companies are driven to bankruptcy this way each year, while the LO has become the by far largest labor union in Sweden (which is the reason Sweden has the largest percentage of union members in the world). And this legal mafia, this subsidized racketeering entity, controls the contents in the country's largest newspaper, the Evening Post. Because, hey, it's very profitable for the Party.

Curiously the Schibstedt Corporation is the sole owner of the conservative Swedish Daily, at the same time as it owns half of the socialist Evening Post. This goes to show that it is concerned only with profit, not with following the voice of its heart in an effort to enlighten people. Right or left doesn't matter, as long as the newspapers yield a profit and keep within the Correct guidelines.

Interestingly, there are no major newspapers in Sweden owned by private Swedes. They are all owned by either Jews, the LO or foreigners. Jews dominate the scene, even though there are only 60,000 of the tribe in Sweden. I guess they are born that way. They don't dominate any other business in Sweden, but the media -- this they understand.

The Consequences

When you look at the privately owned TV channels and newspapers, it seems like it doesn't matter much anymore whether they are owned by Jews, the government or Big Business. The result is basically the same. It seems like the big capitalists have decided not to fight the Jews and the government in a cultural war, as it is more profitable if all are pulling in the same direction. The agents of Correctness move quite freely from company to company nowadays, as they all want basically the same thing. The Swedish Daily is supposedly conservative, but it seems their conservatism, like that of the parties it supports, is only concerned with economic policies. The social policies are just kosher Correctness all the way, if not by active pushing then by quiet consent. The Daily News was supposed to be "liberal," which here in Europe means libertarian; however, a few years ago Bonnier decided to color it redder, and fired its political editor because she wasn't "marching in lock-step" as it so eloquently put it.

The Express used to call itself liberal as well, but its latest political editor has decided that it should be more "center," meaning it should move more to the left. The Evening Post is outspokenly and aggressively socialist, and has chosen a clever strategy to reach its audience; to fill about fifty percent of its pages with images, and to use as simple language and as little facts as possible. You know the drill. Works with the simple-minded.

I read today an article in the Express online: Thorbjorn Larsson, formerly the boss at TV 4, becomes the new chairman at the Express. In his interview he laughs merrily at questions about his earlier active support of communism; during the Cold War he was a member of communist "cells," and a sympathizer of the Swedish Communist Party. It has later been revealed that this party received both funding and orders from the KGB. The main order: to support pacifism at all times. (This follows a pattern shown all across Europe: the French Communist Party received funding and the same order from the KGB. Curious how communists in the West were always shouting for less arms, while their bosses in the East were always producing more of them)

So, this communist, this traitor, has been in charge of our largest Jew-controlled television channel, and is now becoming the chairman of our Jew-controlled second-largest newspaper. Names flicker back and forth across the screen, switching places, but the main players and their agendas remain the same. Always the government, with its TV channels, its radio channels, its bought-and-paid-for servants in the movie industry and art. Always the Jews, ever expanding, buying more and rarely if ever selling to a non-Jew. The remains picked up by Big Business, caring only about money as you need to in order to reach the top these days, knowing fully well that if you can't beat 'em it is more profitable to join 'em.

Now, if anyone believes that the media don't try to affect people's opinions, I have only one thing to say: get to know the business. I have two acquintances who study journalism, and they both confirm that the media's role in shaping opinions is considerable. It is openly discussed in their seminars. It is studied by professors in journalism, and it is discussed by journalists in editorials. Pick up one of those editorials, and show it to those who say that "newspapers only give people what they want."

Tell them to think of the media as a magnet affecting a large piece of iron: if it moves too quickly, it loses the connection, and the iron remains where it is. If it keeps just close enough however, the magnet can make the piece of iron slowly follow its lead. And of course, if you have several magnets all pulling in the same direction in, say, matters of race, then you have a powerful accumulated effect indeed.

Need some proof? Look at the "corporate visions" available on the Internet. They don't say "Hey, there is nothing we can do to affect people's opinions, they would only buy another newspaper if we tried." Instead they state in what direction they are pushing, and the assumption that they are part of molding people's minds is taken for granted.

Witness the Jew-controlled Vivendi's corporate vision, as it discusses the company's "values":

"Cultural Diversity

"We recognize and value our multi-cultural background as a company. We draw on this wealth of diversity as a unique strength to preserve, promote and protect the rich cultural character of countries, communities and local regions. We value the variety of our dynamic content, which represents our heritage and the world's cultural diversity, and we strive to deliver competitively superior services to local markets."

Forget this part: "to preserve, promote and protect the rich cultural character of countries, communities and local regions." This is fog. They are selling Hollywood movies, nothing else, and I don't think many of those are made in Bavaria or Prague. The key Newspeak word here is "diversity," and it has nothing to do with preserving European culture.

Now let us look at the Jewish Daily News. At any given day you will find an interview with at least one Negro poet, Latino writer, or communist-feminist who has just received more of the taxpayers' money to produce her latest film. The Daily News specializes in anti-White editorials more than economic ones, reaching an unrivaled level of aggression in this matter. Today's chief editorial reads "They Give Us Our Jobs," and tells us how good it is to have more and more immigrants in the country. The Jews love this, as they get more allies. The socialists love this, as they get more votes. The "liberals" love this, as their doctrine demands open borders. The conservatives keep their mouths shut and nod, saving their energy for economic debates.

As with all European leftism, anti-Americanism is thrown in almost automatically. The second editorial is about how terrible the death penalty is in that hopelessly deranged country on the other side of the Atlantic, where people are stupid conservative racists in cowboy hats, the whole lot of 'em (there was a lot of cheering going on in Sweden after September 11, by those who reason the more dead Americans, the better). America symbolizes capitalism and White oppression. Needless to say, most Europeans have no knowledge at all of American domestic politics.

The "vision" for the Daily News is short: "During a time of great changes the DN will with new sharpness promote the open society's basic values, such as enlightened reason and a tolerant climate." Nothing about promoting Sweden's interests, nothing about finding out what is good for Swedes. The key Newspeak word here is "tolerance," meaning the same as "diversity." Some Newspeak is the same on both sides of the Atlantic; it is invented in the U.S., and then travels here via Hollywood. I expect editorials to start using "hate" any time now.

Friends from Finland confirm that parts of their media influenced by the Bonniers have significantly changed their tune, from pro-Finnish to anti-White. Fins are being told to feel guilt because of their low influx of immigrants, and the result is an increased darkening of the Finnish Fatherland. No matter where you look, the Jews have the same plans for all.

The other newspapers are pushing the same theme, more or less: whenever they discuss race relations, it is from the angle of what is good for the dark races, not what is good for Swedes. The most sinister journalists refer to non-Whites as "Swedes" simply because they live in Sweden, which is about the same thing as calling someone an Aryan just because he is living in Europe -- or a member of my family just because he is standing on my front lawn.

Perhaps we shouldn't pay so much attention to the written media, however. Studies show that most Swedes spend only eighteen minutes a day reading newspapers (a few minutes more than in the U.S.). This includes the time spent on sports pages and the TV section. Far more dangerous is the government control of Channel One and Channel Two. Every time I look at their news broadcasts I am amazed that people can watch this without realizing they are being fed propaganda. The dramatic wording, the choice of news, the assumptions and insinuations -- it is all anti-conservative and anti-White. This, combined with the schools, has shaped entire generations of Swedes, and kept us cut off from the rest of the world and from reality. And now we also have the choice of Jew News on TV 4.

Suppression of free speech

A few years back people could still wear any political symbols they wanted in Sweden. The Justice Department gnarled at this, complaining that conservatives were too adamant in their opposition to banning this free expression of political loyalties. Then it had a stroke of luck: someone found an old law from the thirties called the "uniform law" that banned political uniforms. Perfect! This was immediately put into new use, not only for uniforms, but for buttons and anything else.

The Minister of Justice was quick to explain, however, that we shouldn't regard this as an infringement on our right to free speech. The law would only be used against nationalist symbols. Police officials nodded and repeated: only those wearing symbols of the extreme right would be prosecuted, no one else. This may be difficult to accept, but it is true: our own politicians told us in plain Swedish that a law would be used selectively. There was no attempt to stealth: they said it without so much as flinching. And Swedes, most of them receiving their news from Government TV, never stopped to question this, since the reporters didn't.

This is nothing unusual in Europe, as the argument goes: Sweden was actually too slow at inventing infringements on free speech (only because of the government's television monopoly, which made such laws pretty much unnecessary). Remember the boycott of Austria when the Austrians dared vote for Haider's party? That is the European Union in action. Visit Germany, Belgium or France and speak your mind about things, and count how many minutes it takes for the police to reach you. The Minister of the Interior in France can actually shut down any newspaper he doesn't like. Although he doesn't have the power to close down the newspaper per se, he does have the power to prevent it from being printed. Very clever.

Usually the oppressive laws are like that, a patchwork that doesn't come right out and order you to obey the establishment, but that prevents dissent anyway. That way, when you discuss these matters you have to show a number of separate laws, bury yourself in details, and therefore lose the interest of your audience. It also keeps everybody on his toes, because no one is sure just what the law actually says, and which law says it. You only hear on TV of someone going to jail for doing something "racist," and you get the message.

Let us look at an example that perfectly expresses the climate in Swedish media. I will quote from an article in the Swedish Daily, written on March 7 this year. It begins: "The editor of the Evening Post's website was convicted today of instigation against ethnic groups. A court in Stockholm released him on probation and fined him 36,000 crowns [about 3,600 dollars]."

Perhaps I should have mentioned that we nowadays don't have freedom of speech in Sweden, not in racial matters or matters concerning the sexes, or homosexuals. You can be convicted, even sentenced to jail, for saying or writing something "racist," "sexist," or "homophobic." Also, we don't have trial by jury, and never have. A judge and his four advisers convict us, and the judges are not elected officials but appointed from above.

So, what was the crime? The article continues: "The newspaper's website has a debating forum for the public. In October 2000 four posts were made by anonymous writers [as if not everybody is anonymous on a message board] who among other things wrote positive comments about Adolf Hitler."

And for that the writers could be prosecuted, if they had been successfully traced. Inadequate message board, there. But what does this have to do with the editor? We read on: "A private citizen reported the website to the Justice Chancellor who prosecuted the editor for instigation against ethnic groups, a crime against the Constitution."

Yes, it is unconstitutional in Sweden to say anything pro-White, or "hateful" as it would be called in the U.S. It is "instigation against ethnic groups." Even to allow someone else to say it, like this editor did, is forbidden. The article goes on to say that the prosecuted editor agrees that the posts are criminal, he just hadn't seen them yet -- if he had, he would have deleted them, the way he does with all "racist" and "sexist" messages. He pleads his innocence and promises to repent, but the court is unsatisfied: "The court determines that the editor was aware that forbidden messages could slip through, but he was prepared to take the risk since he wanted a broad and public debate on the website."

He wanted a broad and public debate! Well, then, off with his head. Let us hope that this editor knows his place from now on.

Those who thought that free speech was safe on the Internet were mistaken. Another example: the Passage, found at http://passagen.se, is Sweden's largest chatsite. An odd feature here is that your IP-address shows up when you are chatting, and the Passage informs you that anyone writing "racist" messages in chat will be traced and charged with "instigation against ethnic groups." Chatters are actually encouraged to report thoughtcriminals to the site's owners. A quick look at the ownership of Passage informs us that it is part of the Eniro media group, which in turn is owned by Telia, which has the government as majority shareholder. (As a sidenote, the state-created Telia used to have a monopoly on phone services in Sweden, resulting in high costs and lousy service. The moment private entrepreneurs were allowed on the market the prices dropped drastically.)

Americans, do not think that this couldn't happen in your country. It has happened to everyone else in the West, so why not to you? Your Constitution? We have constitutions as well. Constitutions can be changed, as the socialists gleefully state in debates, "so they aren't any more important than any other law." The Evening Post, for example, has said many times that nothing must stand in the way of "the will of the people," which is their Newspeak word for the government. From my many hours spent debating in American political chatrooms, I know that your "liberals" would like to write the same thing, but so far it is taboo to say it out loud.

Besides, existing laws can be twisted and turned to your heart's content. Again, look at the way Austria was treated. The EU officials quoted laws in that case too, knowing fully well that they were distorting the meaning of those laws, in much the same spirit our Swedish politicians have given the order to use the uniform law selectively.

I have been visiting American news sites for many years, and never have I seen such blatant propaganda as what has been pushed after September 11. It is very clear to me that your government and media masters have a plan with this. The threats they paint in people's minds don't fit reality -- even European media have started to voice concern about what is happening overseas (they can't resist the opportunity to spit at the U.S. for silencing debate, even as they themselves do so at home). Great Britain, Germany, France, Spain and Italy have all faced domestic terrorism, but they have never restricted freedom because of it the way your government did the first chance it had. In Sweden it is "instigation against ethnic groups" that silences people, and even puts them in jail; in the United States I could very well imagine that it will be "instigation to terrorism."

You realize that the VNN website would be closed down, and everyone contributing to it fined or jailed, if it had been made in Western Europe instead of in the United States? This is what must not happen; it would end the last free speech in the Western world. Neither I nor any other Swede would know what the Jews are doing in the United States and here if we hadn't read it on the NA website. And such a website is only possible in America.

The media here not only approve of oppression, they promote it and help sustain it. In this they all work together. The depth of their partnership in crime was shown with all desirable clarity in November 1999, when all four major newspapers printed the same article: a multiple-page list of the names of active nationalists, complete with their photographs. The message was clear: resist, and we will harrass you any way we can. The desired effect was also obtained: several men and women on this list lost their jobs, or were suspended from university studies, and some were attacked and beaten by immigrant gangs. That they were socially ostracized by the ignorant and cowardly is something I take for granted, just as I know this was the purpose of the media assault.

It is to these patriotic men and women that I dedicate this article. Fully aware of the risks they take they are all spending their lives contributing to the defense of Sweden, and what they have sacrificed for me and other Swedes cannot be underestimated. I am still young, but seeing such courage I know it is my duty to follow their lead. The first step is to know our enemy; the second, to fight.

FREDRIK HAERNE

http://vanguardnewsnetwork.com/v1/index359.htm
 
Old July 4th, 2009 #77
Robert Bandanza
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: JUDEAware, originally MassaJEWsetts
Posts: 8,901
Default Judiska historia; ett potpurri av missförstånd, förföljelse och lidande

Av Magnus Söderman

Detta är en historisk överblick över många av de oförrätter som drabbat det judiska folket. Av någon outgrundlig anledning har detta lilla nomadfolk om och om igen blivit anklagade för än det ena och än det andra med följden att de förvisats från i stort sett varje nation de satt sin fot.

Härskare, krigare, kungar, präster, författare, filosofer och så vidare har utan anledning angripit judarna och skrivit de mest nedriga saker om dem. Låt oss nu metodiskt arbeta oss igenom historiens vingslag och litet närmare undersöka alla de gånger detta folk tvingats lida för... ja, hela övriga mänsklighetens okunskap, rädsla och grymhet.

Forntiden
Egypten: Någon gång under det andra årtusendet före Kristus körde egypterna ut judarna från sitt land och detta är det första stora angreppet på detta folk vi känner till. Århundradet senare återkom judarna till Egypten och befäste Alexandria. År 38 e.Kr. utbröt stora kravaller mot den judiska befolkningen där, och åter år 66 e.Kr. Omkring 115-117 e.Kr. attackerades åter igen judarna och deras stora synagoga brändes ned. Så slutligen år 414 e.Kr. utvisades de från staden.

Asien: I staden Medina utvisade och massakrerade Mohammed år 622 e.Kr. samtliga judar. Till en början hade han varit vänligt inställd mot dem men av någon anledning ändrade han sig.
Seleucia var en forntida stad vid Tigrisfloden till vilken judarna flyttade efter förstörelsen av två andra städer. Men år 40 e.Kr. anställdes en massaker på dem där.

Bysantinska kjesardömet: Justinian (kejsare mellan 527 till 565) anammade en grundligt antijudisk politik och förbjöd dem att inneha någon som helst form av ansvarsposition i samhället, en politik som vidmakthölls under århundradena (tilläggas kan att det Bysantinska kejsardömet överlevde det Romerska riket med tusen år).

Rom: Det äldsta fortfarande existerande judiska samhället etablerades i Rom med en nedtecknad historia som sträcker sig tillbaka till år 139 f.Kr. Den store romerska statsmannen Cicero ansåg judarna vara ett fientligt element och angrep dem frekvent i sina tal i senaten. Kejsare Tiberias förvisade judarna från Rom år 19 e.Kr. men de återvände snart. År 49 eller 50 f.Kr. förvisade kejsare Claudius ett stort antal judar därifrån. År 116 beordrade kejsare Trajanus en massaker på judarna i Mesopotamien eftersom de ansågs ställa till med uppror och oroligheter. Med jämna mellanrum utbröt det folkliga uppror mot judarna i Rom men någon politik likt Justinians fastslogs aldrig.

Medeltida Europa
I kölvattnet av Roms utvidgning följde judarna efter in i Europa där de slog sig ner på olika platser. Av någon anledning kom judarna att ogillas av Europas befolkning och härskare. Åter kom de att utsättas för fruktansvärda förbrytelser. Utrymme finns inte här för en fullständig utläggning men vi skall behandla ett antal olika europeiska nationers reaktioner mot judarnas närvaro.

Österrike: Mellan 1300-talet till 1600-talet anklagades judarna frekvent i denna nation. År 1420 anklagades judarna för ritualmord vilket ledde till att de brändes, förvisades och/eller tvångsdöptes. Men detta fick dem inte att försvinna så år 1670 förvisades de åter, då av Margareta Theresa.
I Salzburg angreps och massakrerades de judiska samhällena år 1349 och 1404. År 1498 utvisades de av ärkebiskopen. I Tyrolen anklagades judarna för att ha förgiftat brunnar och även för ritualmord. Konsekvensen av detta blev ett försök att utrota de judiska samhällena i Trent, Rinn och Linz. Slutligen förvisades samtliga judar från Tyrolen år 1520.
Men de återvände. Wiens borgmästare Karl Lueger (1844-1910) förbjöd bland annat judarna att inneha samhälleliga ansvarsuppgifter samt införde han segregerade skolor. Detta hade dock inte den inverkan han hade hoppats och judarna kunde leva rätt så tryggt i Österrike fram till Hitlers annektering år 1938.

England: Med normandernas intåg kom judarna 1066. År 1144 kom så de första anklagelserna om ritualmord. Vid tiden för det tredje korståget utbröt det stora kravaller riktade mot judarna över hela England med mycken blodspillan till följd. Hatet mot judarna fortsatte att växa och till sist utvisades samtliga av kung Edward I år 1290.
I London var judarna fast etablerade innan år 1100. År 1189, vid tiden för Rickard I kröning attackerades och mördades stadens judar i legio. Fler attacker mot judarna skedde mellan krigsåren 1263-1266. Åren 1238, 1244 och 1276 fördes anklagelser om ritualmord fram mot judarna.
Tack och lov för judarna fann de en vän i Oliver Cromwell som år 1655 öppnade Englands port för dem och sedan dess har de kunnat leva något sånär tryggt i landet.

Frankrike: Efter det första korståget (år 1096) skedde frekventa attacker mot judarna i Frankrike. I Blois anklagades judar för ritualmord och 31 judar hängdes för detta. Vid tiden för det fjärde korståget (1235-1236) massakrerades judar i Bretagne och sedermera förvisades de kvarvarande därifrån år 1391. I staden Carcassonne utvisades judarna tillfälligtvis år 1253 och sedan åter år 1306, och igen år 1394. Efter anklagelser om ritualmord i Dauphineprovinsen utvisades de därifrån år 1253. Men de återvände år 1289. Efter år 1305 utgick ett antal förvisningsorder mot judarna i Gascogneprovinsen och slutligen år 1394 kom en order om att alla judar skulle bort. År 1306 förvisades alla judar från Frankrike, men med det inte sagt att alla försvann.

Tyskland: Konflikterna mellan tyskarna och judarna har varit många och bara ett fåtal kan omnämnas här. Tyskland var länge, till skillnad från Frankrike och Spanien, fragmenterat och någon nationell enighet i åtgärder mot judarna var inte möjlig. Denna nationella fragmentering gjorde det relativt lätt för judarna att byta områden när de blev attackerade.
År 1090 dödade korsfararna alla judar i Rhenlandet, men detta var bara början. Under tiden för den svarta döden (1348-1349) anklagades judar för att förgifta brunnar genom att kasta ner pestsmittade lik i dem. Under denna tid genomfördes 350 attacker mot judar, 60 större och 150 mindre judiska samhällen förintades och flera städer försökte desperat bannlysa judarna - men de återvände varje gång.
I Breslau utrotades det judiska samhället år 1349. Är 1453 anklagades judar för skändning och 41 judar dödades medan resten förvisades. Åren 1265, 1281 och 1287 förföljdes judar i Koblenz och år 1337 attackerades judar i Armleder. De judiska samfunden utraderades genom massakrer år 1349 men hade återetablerat sig 1356. År 1418 förvisades de från Trierprovinsen. I Dresden finns det nedtecknat om judisk närvaro från 1375 och år 1448 kastades de ut därifrån efter anklagelser om falskmynteri och förräderi.
År 1438 utvisades alla judar från Düsseldorf men de var tillbaka igen på 1500-talet. Trots antijudiska attacker i Erfurt år 1221 fortsatte det judiska samhället att expandera till den stora massakern år 1349. De återvände år 1357 och kastades ut igen år 1458. Det judiska samhället i Frankfurt am Main utrotades år 1241, återetablerade sig senare och utrotades åter år 1349. Attacker mot judar ägde rum i Frankfurt år 1614 vilket ledde till en temporär förvisning och kriget år 1796 möjliggjorde förstörandet av en stor del av judegettot i staden.
I staden Halberstadt körde man ut judarna år 1493 vilka sedan återvände och åter kördes bort år 1549. I Leipzig utrotades judarna år 1349 men andra kom i dess ställe. I staden Mainz förvisades de så tidigt som 1096 trots biskopens beskydd. Även där dödades många judar år 1349 men några blev kvar. Order om förvisning utfärdades åren 1438, 1462 och 1470-1471.
I Nürnberg där judarna varit etablerade sedan 1100-talet blev deras samhälle krossat i och med Rindfleishmassakern år 1298 då minst 728 judar dödades. Under den stora massakern 1349 dödades minst 562 judar och resten förvisades. Men de kom tillbaka och år 1499 förvisades då åter.
I staden Rothenburg förintades det judiska samhället år 1298, det återuppbyggdes och krossades igen år 1349. Judarna återvände och massakrerades år 1397. De återvände år 1402 och drevs ut igen år 1520. Liknande skeenden utspelade sig på många fler platser i Tyskland.
Icke att förglömma när det gäller tyskarnas krig mot judarna är Nazisternas utrotande av sex miljoner (6 000 000) judar i dödsläger medelst giftgas eller genom horribla experiment. Där nådde judehatet sin kulmen och man till och med gjorde tvålar och lampskärmar av judar (eller hur var det nu, hade man ändrat sig på den punkten? Så mycket hemskt har hänt att det är svårt att komma ihåg alla detaljer.) Enligt britterna utrotade man visserligen även lika många judar under första världskriget, vilket även avslöjades i pressen, detta togs dock tillbaka efter krigsslutet då man erkände att det bara hade varit krigspropaganda).

Polen: Anklagelser om ritualmord gav upphov till attacker på judar i Posen år 1399 och i Krakow år 1407. Judarna drevs ut ur Warszawa år 1438 och ur Krakow år 1491. Hundratals judiska samhällen krossades under Chemielnickiupproret. År 1656 utrotades det judiska samhället i Kalisch av general Czarniecki och så sent som 1906 finns det rapporter om pogromer. Vidare passade polackerna på att mörda oskyldiga judar under nazisternas ockupation.

Ryssland: År 1563 dränktes 300 judar vid Polotosk och Vitelski. År 1648 ledde en viss Bogdan Chmielnick, hetman för kosackerna, ett uppror mot judiska och polska markägare. Resultatet var (enligt en judisk källa) förintandet av 744 judiska samhällen och mord på hundratusentals judar.
Då Ryssland annekterade Ukraina år 1667 förvisades alla judar från området. Förbud för judar att besöka ryska områden genomdrevs 1550 och 1678. Order om förvisning gavs åren 1727, 1738 och 1742. År 1753 fördrevs 35000 judar från Ryssland. År 1762 tillät Katarina den Store främlingar att bo i Ryssland, men judar var undantagna.
Tsar Alexander förvisade 20 000 judar från provinserna Vitebesk och Mohilev år 1824. Tsar Alexander II försökte assimilera judarna men mördades år 1881. Anklagelserna för mordet riktades mot judiska revolutionärer och ryssarna svarade med pogromer. Man ansåg judarna som subversiva element som skulle hållas skilda från den övriga befolkningen och genomdrev i detta syfte de så kallade ”majlagarna”. År 1891 fördrevs alla judar från Moskva.

Spanien: I Granada år 1066, då muslimerna fortfarande hade makten fördrevs judarna därifrån. Det judiska samhället återuppbyggdes men krossades åter vid invasionen år 1148. Samma sak hände i Cordova året innan.
I den kristna delen av Spanien sköljde en våg av attacker mot judar under år 1391, speciellt i Granada, Cordova, Segovia och Sevilla. Många judar konverterade till kristendomen men förblev judar i hemlighet.
Under ledning av Ferdinand och Isabella skapades inkvisitionen för att finna rätt på alla konverterade judar. År 1492 befallde Ferdinand och Isabella att samtliga judar skulle bort från Spanien innan den första augusti det året och man genomförde det resolut. Under de nästkommande trehundra åren var den judiska närvaron minimal.

Sverige: Först 1775 tilläts judar att bosätta sig i Sverige utan att avsäga sig sin religion. År 1782 ändrades reglerna så att judarna fick behålla sin religion men dock tilläts de bara att bosätta sig i Stockholm, Göteborg eller Norrköping. Man förbjöd även blandäktenskap samt för judar att arbeta inom något område som lydde under skrå (allt detta reglerades av ”Judereglementet”). Inte förrän 1870 blev judarna likställda med svenskarna i lagens ögon.
I augusti 1838 utbröt pogromer i Stockholm då uppretade svenskar angrep judiska hem och butiker eftersom man, bland annat, inte ville acceptera ett upphävande av ”Judereglementet” vilket diskuterades. Militär sattes in för att lugna de upprörda. Men bara några månader senare brakade det loss igen.
År 1848 var det dags åter då antijudiska grupper attackerade judiska bostäder, ockuperade affärer ägda av judar samt angrep personer som stödde judarna.
År 1852 lyckades en stor samling antijudiska demonstranter bryta igenom polisens skydd av synagogan i Stockholm, vilken överröstes med stenar.

Norge: Eidsvollförfattningen kallas Norges grundlag och den antogs den 16 maj år 1814. Fram till och med år 1851 hade men nedtecknat i denna att judar inte fick komma in i landet. Detta förbud togs dock bort, antagligen när norrmännen insåg att judarna faktiskt är helt harmlösa.

Naturligtvis finns det fler exempel på den hätska antisemitism som världens befolkning visat uttryck för och ovanstående är bara ett litet axplock.

Falska anklagelser i största allmänhet
Som vi kunnat se har judar kollektiv fått skulden för en uppsjö av hemskheter. De har anklagats för ocker i och med utlåning samt skapandet av räntesystemet. Detta bara för att judarnas heliga Talmud vid några tillfällen råkar klargöra att judar får ta ränta av icke-judar, eller för att deras Gamla testamente i Bibeln råkar innefatta samma sak. Man har anklagat (och domstolar anfrätta av antisemitism har dömt) judar för förgiftandet av brunnar och ritualmord. De har anklagats för att ha anstiftat den franska revolutionen genom frimureriet - och det bara för att juden Adam Weishaupt grundade Illuminatorden som sedermera infiltrerade världsfrimureriet. Judarna anklagades för att ha anstiftat den kommunistiska revolutionen bara för att en majoritet av de ledande revolutionärerna var judar, och för att Karl Marx och Friedrich Engels vilka skapade ideologin var judar och för att den internationella bankiren John Jacob Schiff sponsrade revolutionärerna med 20 miljoner dollar och hans firma Kuhn Loeb & Co finansplanerade den första femårsplanen åt Stalin.
Judarna har även blivit anklagade för att ligga bakom skapandet av Federal Reserve (dvs. den amerikanska centralbanken) vilken kontrollerar tillhandahållandet av pengar och därför har ett järngrepp om den amerikanska (och därför världsliga) ekonomin. Federal Reserve är inte ett statligt kontrollerat organ. Och denna beskyllning bara för att Paul Warburg som kokade ihop det hela råkade vara jude.

Äntligen över?
Inte förrän efter 1945, efter tusentals år av orättvis förföljelse, pogromer och förvisningar har nu judarna accepterats av världssamfundet. De har till och med fått tilldelat sig ett land, Israel, vilket man dock tog från några som anser sig vara ursprungsbefolkningen, vilka nu bedriver ett heligt krig mot den judiska närvaron. Man har också i många västerländska nationer sett till att angrepp på judar skall vara omöjliga eftersom man lagstiftat bort rätten att anklaga dem för något, ja, till och med har man i Tyskland olagliggjort att ens förneka eller ifrågasätta förintelsen. Flera personer har fängslats, tvingats i landsflykt med mera på grund av detta brott. För att vara på den säkra sidan ser dock judarna till att genom egna organisationer som Anti-Defamation League i USA bevaka och kartlägga det fåtal personer som finns kvar vilka inte ger med sig utan fortsätter att anklaga judarna för diverse saker.

Tack och lov börjar judarna nu att finna sin plats bland världens folk och visst är det glädjande att deras inflytande inom media, bankväsende och nöjesindustri givit dem stort inflytande. Nu kanske inga fler misstag, likt dem som miljontals människor begått under årtusendena, komma kunna upprepas. Alla dessa påståenden om att judar låg bakom den ryska revolutionen (bara för att så många judar råkade anamma kommunismen som politisk ideologi) eller den franska revolutionen kanske snart kommer att upphöra. Kanske alla dessa lösryckta citat ur judarnas heliga skrifter (som att det skulle vara acceptabelt att lura en ickejude, döda en ickejude, förgripa sig på ickjudiska barn och så vidare) kommer att försvinna. Det är glädjande att se att vi på 69 år lyckats vända från att se judarna som en fara till att se dem som en tillgång.

Att man inte gjort det tidigare är sannerligen ett mysterium.

http://patriot.nu/artikel.asp?artikelID=1299
 
Old August 31st, 2009 #80
Tom McReen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,544
Default First swine flu death in Sweden

Quote:
Sweden reported its first swine flu death on Monday, a hospital in the central city of Uppsala announced, the first death from the A(H1N1) virus in the Nordic countries.

"We received the test results which confirm that the man in his 30s who died last Friday had H1N1 flu," the Akademiska hospital said in a statement.

The man had flu symptoms and died at his home near Uppsala, 80 kilometres (50 miles) north of Stockholm. He had not been travelling abroad.

Several people with the A(H1N1) virus are currently seriously ill in Sweden, where more than 900 people have been infected with the virus.

The other Nordic countries -- Denmark, Finland and Norway -- have so far not reported any deaths from the disease.

Sweden has already signed an agreement with a laboratory for a delivery of 18 million doses of vaccine for its 9.3 million population: the treatment requires two doses.

The first batches are expected early next month and will be on a voluntary basis, even if Sweden wants as many people as possible to take up the offer.

More than 2,180 people around the world have died from the virus since it emerged in April, according to the latest WHO figures, with an estimated 210,000 people infected in 177 countries.
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/18/20090831...p-5effa79.html
__________________
'We live in a world defined by the jewish media' - Geoff Beck, TTIND.

'Gentiles are supernal garbage' - Rabbi Schneur Zalman, founder of Chabad-Lubavitch.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28 AM.
Page generated in 0.23079 seconds.