RT has become a clown site

[Ray Allan]

I can't look at it right now. Every story and clickbait article there is about the goddamned Jew Flu. Along with the rest of the media, too.

[Stewart Meadows]

.
RT has always been a mixed bag, and at this point I think the bad things outweigh the good. It has published a lot of excellent articles that demolish the "Western" (read: jewish) media's lying propaganda about Russiagate and Venezuela, but sadly it also acts as a mouthpiece for the mass-murdering Chinese regime.

For example, when the Chinese coronavirus was starting to spread in the West, RT excreted articles/op-eds that downplayed the outbreak, and Westerners who were concerned about it were denounced as xenophobes, racists, etc.

Later, when the truth became too obvious to hide, RT changed its tactics and started attacking the US for not acting sooner to prevent the outbreak while praising China for its supposedly swift response. (Contradiction much? Good grief...)

The most disgusting example of RT's pro-Chinese propaganda is the op-ed "Human life must trump economics in a pandemic. THIS is why China is succeeding in war on Covid-19 and US is on path to disaster", which is one of the most chutzpathic pieces of crap I've ever come across - and that's saying a lot, considering all the jewish newspaper articles I've read.

As if that's not enough, RT has also defended the loathsome jewish pedophile Woody Allen and attacked people who have a problem with his disgusting behavior.

Another thing that I dislike about RT is its constant mocking of animal rights and the people who support them.

And then there's the fact that it keeps shoehorning the usual "Hitler was evil" nonsense in articles that have nothing to do with WWII. Because, you know, it's not like we've heard enough about that in the (((Western))) media.

[Ray Allan]

PressTV from Iran is similar. I use it a lot, especially for articles about the jewSA military I post in the Green Nigger thread and other material countering the western jewmedia garbage. On the other hand, PressTV spouts the same anti-White/divershitty propaganda you get in news sources in the u.s. and Europe. With very few exceptions, there is no getting away from it anymore, VNNF being one exception.

[Ray Allan]

Ever since the St. George Floyd story started, PressTV has gone off the rails with all the "White privilege", divershitty and pro-nigger crap that it's becoming nearly impossible to use that site as a news source. Ditto for RT. You may as well be reading CNN.

[Stewart Meadows]

Originally Posted by Stewart Meadows

(...) As if that's not enough, RT has also defended the loathsome jewish pedophile Woody Allen and attacked people who have a problem with his disgusting behavior.

RT keeps excreting outrageous op-eds that defend the creepy, disgusting (and talentless) old jew shitbag Woody Allen. Here's an example:

Woody Allen deserves an apology. Years of unfounded demonization have failed to crush his creativity

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/490242-wood...erves-apology/

Actually, the allegations that Allen sexually abused Dylan Farrow when she was 7 years old are highly credible. Here's a good piece on this subject:

10 UNDENIABLE FACTS ABOUT THE WOODY ALLEN SEXUAL-ABUSE ALLEGATION


BY MAUREEN ORTH

FEBRUARY 7, 2014

This week, a number of commentators have published articles containing incorrect and irresponsible claims regarding the allegation of Woody Allen’s having sexually abused his adopted daughter, Dylan Farrow. As the author of two lengthy, heavily researched and thoroughly fact-checked articles that deal with that allegation—the first published in 1992, when Dylan was seven, and the second last fall, when she was 28—I feel obliged to set the record straight. As such, I have compiled the following list of undeniable facts:
(...)
5. In his 33-page decision, Judge Wilk found that Mr. Allen’s behavior toward Dylan was “grossly inappropriate and that measures must be taken to protect her.” The judge also recounts Farrow’s misgivings regarding Allen’s behavior toward Dylan from the time she was between two and three years old. According to the judge’s decision, Farrow told Allen, “You look at her [Dylan] in a sexual way. You fondled her . . . You don’t give her any breathing room. You look at her when she’s naked.”

6. Dylan’s claim of abuse was consistent with the testimony of three adults who were present that day. On the day of the alleged assault, a babysitter of a friend told police and gave sworn testimony that Allen and Dylan went missing for 15 or 20 minutes, while she was at the house.

7. The Yale-New Haven Hospital Child Sex Abuse Clinic’s finding that Dylan had not been sexually molested, cited repeatedly by Allen’s attorneys, was not accepted as reliable by Judge Wilk, or by the Connecticut state prosecutor who originally commissioned them. The state prosecutor, Frank Maco, engaged the Yale-New Haven team to determine whether Dylan would be able to perceive facts correctly and be able to repeat her story on the witness stand. The panel consisted of two social workers and a pediatrician, Dr. John Leventhal, who signed off on the report but who never saw Dylan or Mia Farrow. No psychologists or psychiatrists were on the panel. The social workers never testified; the hospital team only presented a sworn deposition by Dr. Leventhal, who did not examine Dylan.

8. Allen changed his story about the attic where the abuse allegedly took place. First, Allen told investigators he had never been in the attic where the alleged abuse took place. After his hair was found on a painting in the attic, he admitted that he might have stuck his head in once or twice. A top investigator concluded that his account was not credible.

9. The state attorney, Maco, said publicly he did have probable cause to press charges against Allen but declined, due to the fragility of the “child victim.” Maco told me that he refused to put Dylan through an exhausting trial, and without her on the stand, he could not prosecute Allen.

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2014...abuse-10-facts

That's right, folks. Vanity Fair is more credible than RT. Amazing, isn't it?

Woody Allen. "Trust me, goyim."

[Stewart Meadows]

.
RT is spreading pro-rapeugee propaganda:

Britannia used to rule the waves, now it attacks defenceless people in tiny boats to deflect from its own sinking status


Andrew Dickens is an award-winning writer on culture, society, politics, health and travel for major titles such as the Guardian, the Telegraph, the Independent, the Daily Mail and Empire.

13 Aug, 2020 07:00 / Updated 2 days ago

The British once had the greatest navy in the world. Now we’re making a big deal of ‘defending’ ourselves from an imaginary ‘invasion’ of refugees in order to distract from our embarrassing collapse into economic and moral ruin.
(...)
he big news is… little boats of refugees are crossing the English channel.
The government has done what it always does – it’s caused a distraction from its own failings by blaming an ‘other.’ Sometimes that ‘other’ can defend itself, like China or Russia, but when you’re metaphorically in deep water, the government’s favourite thing to do is point at desperate, defenceless people literally in deep water and blame them for all the problems they've caused. It’s not so much dog-whistle xenophobia as loudly shouting, “Attack the foreigners, Fido!”

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/497845-uk-r...estine-threat/

Here are some good comments for the article:

Imaginary" invasion. LOL author discredits himself in first paragraph.

Why is RT printing this sludge? I don't come here to read woke garbage. The persons are not refugees, why isn't there border control? How many billions out there don't have a shirt on their back? Let's hope the ones that make it to UK get to live in this journalist's house.

Yeah, the editor is simply printing click bait, no substance. I see crap like this too often, I'll remove the bloody app.

RT is defending migrants invasion now ?

[Ray Allan]

The thing is, RT is financed by the Russian government through its tax base. So the Russian government is pro-rapeugee invasion (as long as it doesn't happen in Russia, I guess), and anti-White European now? I also notice they have Nebojsa Malic working for them now. Back when he was with antiwar.com he mocked and insulted me in the comments section of an article dealing with WW2, when I mentioned that Hitler invaded the USSR in 1941 to preempt Stalin from invading Europe. So Mr. Malic toes the party line when it comes to World War Jew. Fuck RT.

Russia Insider is much better.

[Stewart Meadows]

.
RT has published a ridiculous op-ed by some jew-lackey who claims that the violent, jew-backed, criminal riots in Belarus are not a (((color revolution))), but legitimate protests:

The Belarusian protests are not a ‘color revolution’ – they’re the result of Lukashenko repeating Soviet mistakes



Bradley Blankenship, Prague-based American journalist, political analyst and freelance reporter. He has a syndicated column at China Global Television Network where he writes about politics in the United States, Latin America, the Middle East and Europe, he's also a contributor to Policy Network, an international progressive think tank based in London, and a freelance reporter for international news agencies including Xinhua News Agency.

12 Aug, 2020 20:36 / Updated 7 days ago

Protests following Sunday’s presidential election in Belarus have entered the fourth day. Videos of police brutality spread online and foreign ministries across the world are condemning the actions of the Belarusian police.

While temping to default to the knee-jerk reaction that what’s going on in the country is a ‘color revolution’, claims by President Alexander Lukashenko that the protests are foreign-organized are bunk and should not be taken seriously. The political actions of Belarusians now are legitimate and deserve our attention.
(...)
Things should not be twisted. It’s easy to see that geopolitical powers are not at work as both the West and Russia – the two major competing powers that have a stake in Belarusian internal affairs – are virtually in unison in their criticism of Lukashenko.

No one in the West has recognized the results of the election as foreign ministries from EU member states have, to various degrees, criticized and cast doubt on the results.
(...)
But Lukashenko is unfortunately clinging to power, using the illegitimate election as his mandate and blaming everyone – no matter their geopolitical interests – for the unrest.

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/497858-bela...or-revolution/

Disgraceful and pathetic.

If you want the truth about the situation in Belarus, then I would recommend the following excellent thread that was started by our member Dawn Cannon:

President Lukashenko set to claim landslide win

https://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=559283

[rod crowley]

It's typical for these times.838