|
December 20th, 2005 | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Posts: 160
|
Sydney, French riots reflect cultural, not racial, problem
The Australian
Cut & paste: Sydney, French riots reflect cultural, not racial, problem December 21, 2005 Mark Steyn, in The Daily Telegraph in London, on the failure of Muslims to assimilate into Western society WHAT'S the deal with these riots in Sydney? You switch on the television and there are scenes of urban conflagration and you think, "Hang on, I saw this story last month." But no. They were French riots. These are Australian riots. Entirely different. The French riots were perpetrated by – what's the word? – "youths". The Australian riots were perpetrated by "white youths". Same age cohort, but adjectivally enhanced . . . There are no doubt "white racists" down under, but, as an explanation of what's going on, it's almost quaintly absurd. "People of Middle Eastern background" have prospered in Australia. The Governor of NSW, Marie Bashir, is Lebanese, as is her husband, Nicholas Shehadie, as is the premier of Victoria, Steve Bracks. Likewise, in my own state of New Hampshire, one of the least racially diverse jurisdictions in North America, the last Senate race was nevertheless fought between a Republican, John Sununu, and a Democrat, Jeanne Shaheen, both from Lebanese families. All these successful politicians are of Lebanese Christian stock: that's to say, after a third of a century in their new countries, they weren't conversing with reporters in Arabic. It's not racial, it's cultural. And the cries of "Racist!" are intended to make any discussion of that cultural problem beyond the pale. In that sense, Sydney's beach riots are a logical sequel to what happened in France. From opposite ends of the planet, there are nevertheless many similarities: non-Muslim women are hectored and insulted in the streets of both Clichy-sous-Bois and Brighton-le-Sands. The only difference is that, in Oz, the "white youths" decided to have a go back. These days, whenever something goofy turns up on the news, chances are it involves a fellow called Mohammed. A plane flies into the World Trade Centre? Mohammed Atta. A gunman shoots up the El Al counter at Los Angeles airport? Hesham Mohamed Hedayet. A sniper starts killing petrol station customers around Washington, DC? John Allen Muhammed. A guy fatally stabs a Dutch movie director? Mohammed Bouyeri. A terrorist slaughters dozens in Bali? Noordin Mohamed. A gang-rapist in Sydney? Mohammed Skaf. Maybe all these Mohammeds are victims of Australian white racists and American white racists and Dutch white racists and Balinese white racists and Beslan schoolgirl white racists. But the eagerness of the Aussie and British and Canadian and European media, week in, week out, to attribute each outbreak of an apparently universal phenomenon to strictly local factors is starting to look pathological. "Violence and racism are bad" (as Cate Blanchett put it at Coogee Beach last Friday), but so is self-delusion. Prime Minister John Howard, on the Nine Network's Today program yesterday: QUESTION: A poll conducted by The Sydney Morning Herald suggests that 75 per cent of Australians disagree with you when you say that there's no underlying racism in this country . . . Howard: I don't think (that poll) quite means what it appears on the surface. At the same time as that poll there was a poll that said 81 per cent of people supported multiculturalism and a majority of people thought that our present migrant intake was about right. Now if there is underlying racism in Australia, I find it har to believe that 81 per cent of the population would support multiculturalism – the two things don't sit together. Multiculturalism means a lot of things, different things to different people, but in its lowest common denominator it means that people believe in diversity and are therefore tolerant of racial and ethnic difference. So if 81 per cent of the population is tolerant and supportive of ethnic and racial difference, then you can't simultaneously have underlying racism . . . There are some people in the Australian community who are racist, but I do not believe the average Australian is a racist, I do not believe that the majority of Australians are racist. I mean why would we have accepted people so well? Why do we practise every day our tolerance and our respect for people? It is very important as we go through the difficulty of reacting to these events that we don't overreact. It's very important we don't become too self-critical. It's very important we don't lose any of the confidence that we've had as an outward-looking nation because we are the most successful role model around the world of absorbing people from different parts of the world. |
December 21st, 2005 | #2 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: southoffred
Posts: 197
|
No one seems yet to have posted this opinion piece from the Sydney Morning Herald on how the authorities are continuing to vigorously pursue whites for thought crimes but are giving the Lebanese Muslims a pass.
http://smh.com.au/news/opinion/gangs...032077070.html December 22, 2005 Quote:
|
|
December 23rd, 2005 | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Posts: 160
|
Reptiles in the NSW ALP
It just goes to show how dishonourable and unfit for office Iemma and his Mafia ALP Government are.
|
December 23rd, 2005 | #4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 167
|
How can you be all that surprised?
Nobody here on VNN has been surprised that the police VIGOROUSLY cracked down on angry whites defending themselves... but were SOMEHOW UNABLE to protect white Australians from Lebanese "retribution." Australian authorities, like it or not, are more interested in closing the beaches keeping whites from organizing than they are protecting the general populace. The Australian government will refuse to stop the Lebanese terror. They are more interested in stoping whitey so Howard can let in millions more Lebanese and Asians. You are not protected. They no longer represent you. |
January 1st, 2006 | #5 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Posts: 160
|
Quote:
The New South Wales State Government Police Service is responsible for the lawlessness of the lebanese gangs of criminals. Nothing to do with the Australian Government. Immigration, however, is indeed a Federal Government responsibility. However these two governments are run by opposing political parties, so it is difficult to make a connection between these two issues, as the policy of one government. |
|
February 21st, 2006 | #6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 59
|
What a lot of Australians DO NOT KNOW is that the Labor party in Australia (Labor - left wing, socialist roots, many marxists, leninists, trots) is strongly anti-white Australian.
Speeches by the ex prime minister Gough Whitlam on the occassion of his 80th birthday celebrations indicate his racism and his powerful desire to see white Australia transcended by coloreds. Mark Latham is also anti-white, so is Kim Beazly (made a similar anti-white speech on the same occassion). Marie Bashir was only appointed to the position of governor of the state because she is NON-WHITE. The previous governor was a jew. Morris Iemma, the current premier of the state is a WOG, Michael Costa is a WOG and many other leading Labor people in NSW and in VIC are WOGs. (WOG is Westernized Oriental Gentleman or another way of saying a colored). Many in the Labor party, both state and federal believe that white people are beginning to migrate out of Australia, or are being outnumbered in the cities by coloreds. Don't misunderstand me - I am not saying the Liberal Party is pristine clean on this same racial matter. They have plenty of white-haters too. As evidenced by their immigration policies. They are currently importing huge numbers of Africans, mostly from Somalia. They would have to be the most useless people on the planet. Watch Labor's and the Liberal party's policies on immigration. Listen carefully to what they say. They are racist scum and hate us.
__________________
Your land is only what you can take and hold. |
February 21st, 2006 | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: England
Posts: 944
|
Classic kike/cowardly kwanservative argument:
'Non-whites riot. The liberals blame white racism. But it's not white racists, because, as these one or two exceptions to the rule 'prove' (in vastly different conditions - New Hampshire is not Paris!), the problem is not race it's KULTCHA'. Bullshit. Classic Humean scepticism about events; break something down into its parts, and see them as bundles of separate but related facts, rather than as derivations of a single concept. The concept is race, or even simple tribalism, of which race is a primal (because physical) example. The main derivation of the concept here is - flooding a living space of one tribe with foreigners causes problems (a RACE problem, fuck-all to do with the revolver-reaching word 'kultur'). Comparing New Hampshire and Paris is retarded in the extreme. Raimoondoggie's article on inflaming Muslims is similar: 'The cartoons inflame Muslims. This benefits the Zionists, who benefit from Muslim rage. But who it REALLY benefits is Bin Laden, because he benefits from Zionist manipulation of Muslim rage. Therefore: fuck the Zionists, but you can't call me a bad boy 'cos I said it REALLY benefits Bin Laden.' What bullshit! There are more circles in this line of reasoning than there are in Dante's Hell. http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=8014
__________________
Hate Hurts - Wogs Kill 'At the end of his life he organized a financial offering for the poor in Jerusalem [Jew city] from the gentile churches he had founded.' - St. Paul [Jew], Oxford Companion to Class. Civ. |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|