Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old January 25th, 2016 #1
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 41,394
Blog Entries: 25
Alex Linder
Default Imperium, by Francis Parker Yockey

Imperium, by Francis Parker Yockey

Introduction by Willis Carto

and

Foreward by Yockey

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/M...rium-Intro.mp3 (1:58)


Notes: Imperium: Introduction + Foreward. are we free? we are not. aclu sides with perverts, not illegally persecuted geniuses like yockey. study how our "masters" seek to destroy positive men and movements. what are their tactics? silent treatment, first. assassinations if need be. ex.: Newton Armstrong, Jr. (1962, san diego). tactic: the Smear. distortions, libels, lies positive and negative, to confuse and isolate and destroy. tactic: infiltration and "building up false leadership." finally, if the movement has survived and become institutionalized, misinterpret it deliberately to try to channel it into supporting the desired patterns. christianity and nietzschean ideas have suffered this deliberate misinterpretation to serve Authority. ... faith is the essential ingredient in every historical force. yockey is "sequel" to spengler, who said cultures are organisms. spengler identifies 9 cultures, and says they all follow same path of development and decline, in their various ways. there are certain parallelisms in their evolution... west is addicted to finding universal laws of human behavior. last stage of culture is universalism, imperialism. that's where we are. we encourage minoirities to be nationalistic, but we must be citizens of the world. we are jaded in everything except discussion of race, our last taboo. heyerdahl, Kon-Tiki. Paul Hermann, Conquest by Man. what the west has comes from aryans - from europe. not from greece and rome and jews. there is active suppression of the racial view of history, and scientific efforts are misdirected to the middle east "cradle of civilization" is agitprop, thus we have only scratched the surface of true racial knowledge of our origins. blood mixing destroys Cultures. "at a certain stage, a Culture develops a bad case of universalism." carto says combine our racial knowledge with spengler, so that we can prevent universalist stage of cultural evolution, because that leads to absorbing foreign blood and ideas, which leads to the death of the culture. we must expand into space. that will satisfy our innate cultural Faustian drive to know and expand and conquer. without being culture-destructive. Yockey: Europe will either integrate or die, its people dispersed into colonies run by "extra-Europeans." the spiritual unity is the source of the rest of the unity (political, economic, etc) but it must first be liberated. spirit of Heroism and Discipline.
 
Old January 25th, 2016 #2
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,806
Robbie Key
Default

I might be wrong on this but wasn't Yockey a bit ahead of his time? From what I understand, Yockey very early on was against the US while many other nationalists and 'Nazis' (primarily those who were obsessed with Communism) at the time were propagating and working for the US; see post-WW2 Ukraine for example. He also recognized the legitimacy of the Arab movements who were against Israel and Zionism.

My impression of nationalists after WW2 is that most of them were positive towards the US, and against the Soviet Union. History, to me, has shown us that, that wasn't necessarily the correct position really.

Last edited by Robbie Key; January 26th, 2016 at 04:07 AM.
 
Old January 25th, 2016 #3
Jim Harting
Senior Member
 
Jim Harting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 654
Jim Harting
Thumbs up Yockey and the "Strategy of Tension"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie Key View Post
I might be wrong on this but wasn't Yockey a bit ahead of his time? From what I understand, Yockey very early on was against the US while many other nationalists and 'Nazis' (primarily those who were obsessed with Communism) at the time were propagating and working for the US; see post-WW2 Ukraine for example. He also recognized the legitimacy of the Arab movements who were against Israel and Zionism.

My impression of nationalists after WW2 is that most of them were positive towards the US, and against the Soviet Union. History, to me, has shown us that, that wasn't necessarily the correct position really.
Imperium is one of those books that everyone talks about -- but almost no one has actually read. It is lengthy and difficult, and it was written from a European perspective that is unfamiliar to most American racialists.

Yockey was not "pro-Soviet" or "pro-Russian" as many American racialists believe. Rather, he was an advocate of the Strategy of Tension. This was a strategic approach first devised in the late 1940s by Arthur Axmann and Werner Naumann, who were the de facto leaders of the remnants of the NSDAP in postwar Germany. Later it was taken up by other diehard NS'ers, such as Ernst Otto Remer, Otto Skorzeny and Hans Ulrich Rudel. I believe that Adolf von Thadden, one of the founders of the National Democratic Party, was also a practitioner of this strategy, and in any event he was certainly familiar with it.

In essence, the Strategy of Tension called for National-Socialists in the West to advocate rapprochement with the Soviet Union, while those in the East would adopt a pro-Western stance. The goal was to create a space between East and West in which National-Socialism could exist and grow, in preparation for better days to come. In consequence, Western NS groups were often financed by the Soviets, while those in the East received support from the Americans, the British and the French.

In other words, the goal was to play off the two occupying powers (the Americans and the Soviets) against each other. I guess that it was relatively successful, on a modest scale.

With the collapse of the Soviet Union and the reunification of East and West Germany, this strategy became obsolete and was abandoned. Today, animosity in the German movement is directed almost entirely against America, as the remaining occupying power.

Back in Yockey's day, the American movement was obsessed with the threat posed by the Soviet Union, which was felt to be a bastion of "Jewish Bolshevism." It seems almost inevitable that Yockey's nuanced, politically-adept stance would be misunderstood by the American movement as being "pro-communist."

Ideologically, Yockey wrote that while both the Soviet Russians and the Americans were enemies of the "European Race" (Yockey's term), in the long run the Americans posed a greater danger. He believed (1) that the Jews had a tighter control over the US than they did over the USSR; and (2) that the Russian occupation was superficial, whereas the corruption and degeneracy visited upon Western Europe by the Americans ran deeper and was more spiritually corrosive.

Yockey was not a racialist in the biological sense that we normally use the term today, but if he had been he might have remarked that areas of Soviet occupation remained exclusively White, while race-mixing and mass immigration polluted Western, Americanized Europe. This happened slowly at first, and then accelerated over time to the catastrophic proportions that it has assumed today. But Eastern Europe has remained White, largely because of the legacy of the Russian occupation.
_____________________________________

Point of correction in the OP: although the name "W.A. Carto" appears at the end of the 34 page introduction to Imperium in the Noontide Press edition of the book, that introduction was largely written (95%+) by Revilo Oliver, and not by Carto.
__________________
The NEW ORDER: http://theneworder.org
NEW ORDER on Twitter https://twitter.com/NEW_ORDER_NOW
NS Publications: http://nspublications.com

Last edited by Jim Harting; January 29th, 2016 at 01:42 AM.
 
Old January 25th, 2016 #4
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,119
Serbian
Default

Quote:
Ideologically, Yockey wrote that while both the Soviet Russians and the Americans were enemies of the "European Race" (Yockey's term), in the long run the Americans posed a greater danger. He believed (1) that the Jews had a tighter control over the US than they did over the USSR; and (2) that the Russian occupation was superficial, whereas the corruption and degeneracy visited upon Western Europe by the Americans ran deeper and was more spiritually corrosive.

Under American occupation the victims in many cases don't even know they are occupied, they still think they are free, which was certainly not the case under Soviet occupation. Soviet occupation was really a very primitive clumsy amateur undertaking when compared to the fine Swiss clock functioning judeo American occupation.

My personal view is that Slavs are too 'primitive' to be successful occupiers and tyrants on a global level, which is why jews have chosen the much more capable Anglo Saxons of America to be their global big stick with which to keep 'European (and other) anti semites' in line.

As for Yockey he definitely was ahead of his time.
__________________
Don Black's Stormfront ''Russians''

http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=456327
 
Old January 26th, 2016 #5
Whatheheck
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 818
Default

Holy crap, Alex is taking on Imperium, sounds good.

Like Jim Harting said, it's a difficult read, most give up, like myself.

But one thing I remember, Yockey believed the west should of joined forces with "soviet Russia" to fight international Jewry. It makes sense because post war Russia, although communist, produced a very conservative/nationalistic class of people. Very different from Jewish communism.
 
Old January 26th, 2016 #6
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 41,394
Blog Entries: 25
Alex Linder
Default

We'll see what Yockey says. I have read it before, I find it in parts wrong and muzzy, and in parts correct. I think the jews/USSR was set by the taking of power - it was bloody revolution. And never too secure, at the start. Thus it was set differently than jews coming into America, finding it open and friendly. So they could buy up media and make money and buy people. The circumstances gave birth to different types of jewing.
 
Old January 26th, 2016 #7
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 41,394
Blog Entries: 25
Alex Linder
Default

Imperium, by Francis Parker Yockey

Pages 1-16

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/M...ium-pp1-16.mp3 (32m)

Notes: history recks nothing of human logic. you can escape history or serve it. spengler. each culture-soul is individual expression, takes nothing from and gives nothing to others. spengler looked at 9 cultures. yockey traces path of these individualized cultures. yockey says euro nations are ORGANS of a culture, not cultures themselves. they forget or disbelieve this. culture passes into civilization. reason > religion. money and rationality over symbol and religion and philosophy. culture = inward - poetry, art, literature, religion. civilization = rationality = outward = economics and politics taking center stage. a culture is ORGANIC and as such it lives and dies. it is a unique expression, not to be repeated historically. a High Culture lives 35-45 generations. LIFE has DESTINY; CAUSALITY is for the INORGANIC. DESTINY and FATE are opposites. FATE is part of causality, which comes from science from religion. DESTINY is a thing's INNER NECESSITY and can't be changed, regardless of external incidents which might determine its fate, or outcome. each culture, nation, individual is unique - it has inner necessity and attempts to actualize in the world, where it encounters incidents which may determine its fate, but never alter its destiny, which proceeds, again, from inner necessity. causality is for explaining the inorganic but can never explain life.
 
Old January 26th, 2016 #8
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,806
Robbie Key
Default

The part about expansion into the space, in Carto's/Oliver's introduction, possibly being the new challenge for the White man and his Faustian soul sounded like something Pierce could've taken a lot of inspiration from. It got me thinking of his Cosmotheism, and the generel rhetorics surrounding it, right away.

That Oliver is said to have written most of the introduction only strengthens that suspicion.

Last edited by Robbie Key; January 26th, 2016 at 02:49 PM.
 
Old January 26th, 2016 #9
Whatheheck
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 818
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie Key View Post
The part about expansion into the space, in Carto's/Oliver's introduction, possibly being the new challenge for the White man and his Faustian soul sounded like something Pierce could've taken a lot of inspiration from. It got me thinking of his Cosmotheism, and the generel rhetorics surrounding it, right away.

That Oliver is said to have written most of the introduction only strengthens that suspicion.
Yes, expansion into space was another stand out take away I remember and use quite often to this day. Yockey confirmed my belief. Its man's duty, but man is kind of tied down at the moment lol.
 
Old January 26th, 2016 #10
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,119
Serbian
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
We'll see what Yockey says. I have read it before, I find it in parts wrong and muzzy, and in parts correct. I think the jews/USSR was set by the taking of power - it was bloody revolution. And never too secure, at the start. Thus it was set differently than jews coming into America, finding it open and friendly. So they could buy up media and make money and buy people. The circumstances gave birth to different types of jewing.
The Soviet Union went from being a tightly controlled jew entity following the jew instigated red revolution to a country which split with Zionism, certainly by the 60's when this falling out was official.

50's

Prague trials

Quote:
The Slánský trial (officially Proces s protistátním spikleneckým centrem Rudolfa Slánského meaning "Trial of anti-state conspiracy centered around Rudolf Slánský") was a trial against elements of the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia (KSČ) who were thought to have adopted the line of the maverick Yugoslav leader Josip Broz Tito. On November 20, 1952, Rudolf Slánský, General Secretary of the KSČ, and 13 other Communist leaders or bureaucrats, 11 of them Jews, were accused of participating in a Trotskyite-Titoite-Zionist conspiracy and convicted: 11 were executed and three sentenced to life imprisonment. The state prosecutor was Josef Urválek.

The trial was the result of a split within the Communist leadership on the degree to which the state should emulate the Soviet Union, and was part of a Joseph Stalin-inspired purge of "disloyal" elements in the national Communist parties in Central Europe, as well as a limitation of Jews in the leadership of Communist parties
Keep in mind Tito was an American backed socialist of the Trotskyist flavour, a rabid anti Stalinist who even threatened that should Stalin attempt anything on him and Yugoslavia it will be his last attempt. The post 1945 anti Stalinist purges of Yugoslav communists by Tito were very brutal. Tito's regime not only killed Serbian monarchists/ nationalists who were always opposed to it, it also murdered its own comrades who had'forgotten that now that the war was over still singing praises to Stalin and the Soviet Union was not acceptable, in fact it was very dangerous.


60's

Quote:
In his book A History of the Jews in the Modern World, Howard Sachar describes the atmosphere of the Soviet "anti-Zionist" campaign in the wake of the Six-Day War:


"In late July 1967, Moscow launched an unprecedented propaganda campaign against Zionism as a "world threat." Defeat was attributed not to tiny Israel alone, but to an "all-powerful international force." ... In its flagrant vulgarity, the new propaganda assault soon achieved Nazi-era characteristics. The Soviet public was saturated with racist canards. Extracts from Trofim Kichko's notorious 1963 volume, Judaism Without Embellishment, were extensively republished in the Soviet media. Yuri Ivanov's Beware: Zionism, a book essentially replicated The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, was given nationwide coverage."

A similar picture was drawn by Paul Johnson:

the mass media "all over the Soviet Union portrayed the Zionists (i.e. Jews) and Israeli leaders as engaged in a world-wide conspiracy along the lines of the old Protocols of Zion. It was, Sovietskaya Latvia wrote 5 August 1967, an 'international Cosa Nostra with a common centre, common programme and common funds'".

The Israeli government was also referred to as a "terrorist regime" which "has raised terror to the level of state politics." Even regarding the Entebbe hostage crisis, Soviet media reported: "Israel committed an act of aggression against Uganda, assaulting the Entebbe airport." unlike in the US where Hymiewood made films for the kwans glorifying Entebe kikes

Paul Johnson and other historians have also argued that United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3379 of 10 November 1975 that equated "Zionism" with "racism" was orchestrated by the Soviet Union
Quote:
On 1 April 1983, official newspaper of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Pravda, ran a full front page article titled From the Soviet Leadership:

"...By its nature, Zionism concentrates ultra-nationalism, chauvinism and racial intolerance, excuse for territorial occupation and annexation, military opportunism, cult of political promiscuousness and irresponsibility, demagogy and ideological diversion, dirty tactics and perfidy... Absurd are attempts of Zionist ideologists to present criticizing them, or condemning the aggressive politics of the Israel's ruling circles, as antisemitic... We call on all Soviet citizens: workers, peasants, representatives of intelligentsia: take active part in exposing Zionism, strongly rebuke its endeavors; social scientists: activate scientific research to criticize reactionary core of that ideology and aggressive character of its political practice; writers, artists, journalists: fuller expose anti-populace and anti-humane diversionary character of propaganda and politics of Zionism..." (highlights in original)

Also, at the same time, the CPSU set up the Anti-Zionist Committee of the Soviet Public as an anti-Zionist propaganda tool.
It really wasn't until Gorbachev and Perestroika came along that things changed

Quote:
In March 1985 Mikhail Gorbachev became the Secretary General of the CPSU and in April he declared perestroika. It took more than six years before Moscow consented to restore diplomatic relations with Israel on October 19, 1991, just 2 months prior to the collapse of the USSR and ten days before the Dissolution of the Soviet Union, Soviet sponsored United Nations General Assembly Resolution 46/86 was adopted on 16 December, 1991 which revoked the determination in Resolution 3379, which had called Zionism a form of racism

On Purim, Jews Saved From Stalin’s Genocidal Plan

Quote:
The genocidal plan of Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin, who actually murdered more people than Adolph Hitler, was stymied on the Jewish holiday of Purim.

Stalin, like Hitler, was an anti-Semite and the Jews of the Soviet Union suffered immensely under his rule. Many Jews were forced into slave labor under Stalin upon fleeing Nazi-controlled areas. Jewish refugee children also grew up under horrendous conditions in the Soviet gulag. By 1953, the status of Soviet Jewry had deteriorated even further and Soviet Jews faced a possible genocide. Inexplicably, Soviet dictator Stalin collapsed on Purim. Soon afterward, he died, sparing the Jewish people another Holocaust. It was a miracle!

Stalin’s Final Solution

Stalin’s plan to annihilate the Jews of the Soviet Union, which he formulated immediately prior to his death, remains one of the lesser known facts of history. Not even ten years after the conclusion of the Holocaust, there was a full-scale attack upon Soviet Jews, complete with purges, executions, imprisonments, and the imposed exile of tens of thousands of Jews. In early 1953, the Soviet media alleged that Jewish doctors had conspired to poison top-level Soviet officials, thus increasing the level of hostility directed toward Soviet Jews. The Jews lived in terror under Stalin, especially in the early 1950s. In the midst of the so-called doctors’ plot, Stalin planned to deport two to four million Jews to Siberia and Central Asia, where they would be annihilated as a collective punishment for a conspiracy invented by the Stalin-controlled Soviet media.

http://unitedwithisrael.org/soviet-j...lans-on-purim/


Just those 70's and 80's campaigns in America to free Soviet jewry clearly showed how jews felt about the mid to later period Soviet state which had managed to partially shake them off and re-establish some form of independence.

America has always been the jew's promised land of milk and honey, no other country even came close.
__________________
Don Black's Stormfront ''Russians''

http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=456327

Last edited by Serbian; January 26th, 2016 at 10:01 PM.
 
Old January 27th, 2016 #11
Joe_Smith
Senior Member
 
Joe_Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
Joe_Smith
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie Key View Post
I might be wrong on this but wasn't Yockey a bit ahead of his time? From what I understand, Yockey very early on was against the US while many other nationalists and 'Nazis' (primarily those who were obsessed with Communism) at the time were propagating and working for the US; see post-WW2 Ukraine for example. He also recognized the legitimacy of the Arab movements who were against Israel and Zionism.

My impression of nationalists after WW2 is that most of them were positive towards the US, and against the Soviet Union. History, to me, has shown us that, that wasn't necessarily the correct position really.

After WW2, Communism was like the "Islam" of its time. The Nationalist movement worldwide split into two camps: those that sought to side with America and the "free world" and those who realized that the USSR and Warsaw Pact countries were (politically and culturally) dejudaizing and nowhere near as degenerate or internally anti-white as the West was. Not a surprise that it was during the 50's and 60's that all the red diaper kike babies began formulating modern American "conservatism".

Basically, the movement in Yockey's time suffered from similar weaknesses as the one now: reaction vs revolution. Not to mention being a "fascist" working for NATO and America was far more profitable and safe.

Today you see the equivalent of the first camp manifesting as groups like Pegida, who wave American and Israeli flags in "protest of Islam", despite the entire refugee crisis being orchestrated by these two very forces.

Looking towards the Soviets and the various nationalist revolutionaries they were open to supporting worldwide (Qaddaffi, Arafat, Nasser) was thinking outside of the box at the time. The Soviets , Qaddaffi, etc were very willing to work with and fund genuine European nationalists, Nick Griffin and Roberto Fiore for example, but by and large this never took off because of crass reaction or inability to put aside bigotry of many nationalists.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'"
― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona

Last edited by Joe_Smith; January 27th, 2016 at 01:34 AM.
 
Old January 27th, 2016 #12
Joe_Smith
Senior Member
 
Joe_Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
Joe_Smith
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Harting View Post
Imperium is one of those books that everyone talks about -- but almost no one has actually read. It is lengthy and difficult, and it was written from a European perspective that is unfamiliar to most American racialists.

Yockey was not "pro-Soviet" or "pro-Russian" as many American racialists believe. Rather, he was an advocate of the Strategy of Tension. This was a strategic approach first devised in the late 1940s by Arthur Axmann and Werner Naumann, who were the de facto leaders of the remnants of the NSDAP in postwar Germany. Later it was taken up by other diehard NS'ers, such as Hans-Otto Remer, Otto Skorzeny and Hans Ulrich Rudel. I believe that Adolf von Thadden, one of the founders of the National Democratic Party, was also a practitioner of this strategy, and in any event he was certainly familiar with it.

In essence, the Strategy of Tension called for National-Socialists in the West to advocate rapprochement with the Soviet Union, while those in the East would adopt a pro-Western stance. The goal was to create a space between East and West in which National-Socialism could exist and grow, in preparation for better days to come. In consequence, Western NS groups were often financed by the Soviets, while those in the East received support from the Americans, the British and the French.

In other words, the goal was to play off the two occupying powers (the Americans and the Soviets) against each other. I guess that it was relatively successful, on a modest scale.

With the collapse of the Soviet Union and the reunification of East and West Germany, this strategy became obsolete and was abandoned. Today, animosity in the German movement is directed almost entirely against America, as the remaining occupying power.

Back in Yockey's day, the American movement was obsessed with the threat posed by the Soviet Union, which was felt to be a bastion of "Jewish Bolshevism." It seems almost inevitable that Yockey's nuanced, politically-adept stance would be misunderstood by the American movement as being "pro-communist."

Ideologically, Yockey wrote that while both the Soviet Russians and the Americans were enemies of the "European Race" (Yockey's term), in the long run the Americans posed a greater danger. He believed (1) that the Jews had a tighter control over the US than they did over the USSR; and (2) that the Russian occupation was superficial, whereas the corruption and degeneracy visited upon Western Europe by the Americans ran deeper and was more spiritually corrosive.

Yockey was not a racialist in the biological sense that we normally use the term today, but if he had been he might have remarked that areas of Soviet occupation remained exclusively White, while race-mixing and mass immigration polluted Western, Americanized Europe. This happened slowly at first, and then accelerated over time to the catastrophic proportions that it has assumed today. But Eastern Europe has remained White, largely because of the legacy of the Russian occupation.
_____________________________________

Point of correction in the OP: although the name "W.A. Carto" appears at the end of the 34 page introduction to Imperium in the Noontide Press edition of the book, that introduction was largely written (95%+) by Revilo Oliver, and not by Carto.

This isn't entirely true. Yockey saw in the USSR the preservation of the "authoritarian personality", eg, certain traditional European concepts of society preserved in contrast to the heavily Judaized United States. Because of the "authoritarian personality" espoused by the Soviets, Yockey (Correctly) presumed that he could forge an alliance with them, and ultimately nudge them towards Nationalsocialism easier than the cultural Marxist USA.

In retrospect, he was right. The only people fighting against immigration in Europe right now are the ex Soviet satellite states, still not totally "reconstructed" by Judeo-liberalism of the EU. That's because the Soviet system, thanks to Stalin, for all its faults retained some sense of normalcy in its society and population.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'"
― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona
 
Old January 27th, 2016 #13
Joe_Smith
Senior Member
 
Joe_Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
Joe_Smith
Default

If you check out Soviet academic literature on Jews from the 60's and 1970's, it's remarkably "anti-Semitic". While they rarely used the word Jew, they simply used "Zionism" instead, e.g., "Zionists control Wall Street in the United States".

After World War II, world Jewry was extremely weak and discombobulated. As a cold autocrat, Stalin saw his opportunity to take the USSR away from them and launched a war against "Rootless Cosmopolitans".

Guess who got caught up, almost exclusively, during the cultural campaign against rootless cosmopolitans? A lot of writers, critics, musicians who used Gentile sounding names had their real kike names exposed on the radio, and were decimated as a class.

Jews were never able to recover after this. When Stalin took power in 1925-26, the Soviet Central Committee was entirely Jewish except for him and a couple others (all of them had Jewish wives though). By 1953, the CC was majority Russian with only a few Jews (thanks to Stalin's magic). By the 60's and 70's the Soviet kikes saw the doors were closing and fled to America in order to find a way to destroy their frankenstein.

When his daughter with his second (non-Jewish wife) wanted to marry some Jew filmmaker, Stalin flew into a rage and deported this Jew to the Arctic Circle .

The USSR's development was a big deal to the Frankfurt School. They ended up concluding that just like the Jew revolutionaries preserving the tricolor in 1789 France led to the dejudaizing nationalist force of Napoleon, the Soviet retention of collectivism and civic participation led to a similar situation with Stalin, and broke with Soviet-style communism. Thus, the "Authoritarian Personality" was identified as the main vehicle for anti-semitism, and Soviet Man was considered under this umbrella.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'"
― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona
 
Old January 27th, 2016 #14
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 41,394
Blog Entries: 25
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Imperium, by Francis Parker Yockey

Pages 1-16

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/M...ium-pp1-16.mp3 (32m)
Pages 17-37

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/M...um-pp17-37.mp3 (54m)

NOTES: pg 17-37: Destiny (unchangeable, organic), Causality (for inorganic world). see behind and underneath the external facts of a man to the soul driving within. significance defined by relation to destiny. if D not involved, then the fact is merely Incident. of course, this is subjective. "history is the relationship between the past and present." "Life-tendencies": sacred, profane, skeptical. corresponding to political states. Western culture has the most historic soul, of all cultures. conscious of SIGNIFICANCE of our battles etc. history is "true" in that it informs the minds of "significant" men meaning they see its meaning and their lives in relation to it. ... archaeology destroyed the linear view of history by proving different Cultures existed and mattered, they weren't just tie ins or lead ins to Western or Classical culture. only toward end of 1800s did historians begin to treat different Cultures as independent organisms. idea of cultural history, burckhardt's history of italian renaissance is perfect example. schiller articulated need. only later did people come to grasp meaning of High Cultures as organisms, needing to be looked at in totality of social-cultural expression, taken as a unit, an organism, unique and transient in history. the linear view divides into threes: classical, medieval, modern, but it refuses to see that other cultures are INDEPENDENT of our own, not preludes. "the basis of the linear view was cultural egocentricity" (centering the jew, the leftist might say, or israelites, per old testament). history is made not in streets but on "heights." historical RELATIVITY of cultures is the possession of a few high minds. "The number of men in the Western Civilization who were aware of the actual meaning of the Second World War is countable in thousands."
 
Old January 27th, 2016 #15
Jim Harting
Senior Member
 
Jim Harting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 654
Jim Harting
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe_Smith View Post
This isn't entirely true.
No, what I wrote was entirely, 100% true.

Yockey, following Spengler in Decline of the West, writes that Russia itself (not just Jewish Bolshevism) is separate from, outside of, and hostile to Western Civilization. Yockey contrasts Western European Civilization, which is of Germanic origin, with Eastern Europe, which is Slavic and is irreconcilably opposed to the West.

Yockey famously terms the Jews as "Culture Distorters" who wreck the West by replacing authentic Western civilization with a Judaized version. As Serbian notes above, the Jews use the Anglo-Americans as their primary tools in this process.

The Russians, however, are merely "Barbarians" in Yockey's assessment. Their influence on the West is superficial and temporary.

He further expounds that the Slavic Russians under Stalin have overcome the Jewish Bolsheviks in the Soviet regime. Consequently, they are the lesser of the two evils, and to that extent are preferable to the Anglo-Americans. But the Russians are still enemies of the West, and outside the pale of Western Culture.
__________________
The NEW ORDER: http://theneworder.org
NEW ORDER on Twitter https://twitter.com/NEW_ORDER_NOW
NS Publications: http://nspublications.com
 
Old January 27th, 2016 #16
Joe_Smith
Senior Member
 
Joe_Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
Joe_Smith
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Harting View Post
No, what I wrote was entirely, 100% true.

Yockey, following Spengler in Decline of the West, writes that Russia itself (not just Jewish Bolshevism) is separate from, outside of, and hostile to Western Civilization. Yockey contrasts Western European Civilization, which is of Germanic origin, with Eastern Europe, which is Slavic and is irreconcilably opposed to the West.

Yockey famously terms the Jews as "Culture Distorters" who wreck the West by replacing authentic Western civilization with a Judaized version. As Serbian notes above, the Jews use the Anglo-Americans as their primary tools in this process.

The Russians, however, are merely "Barbarians" in Yockey's assessment. Their influence on the West is superficial and temporary.

He further expounds that the Slavic Russians under Stalin have overcome the Jewish Bolsheviks in the Soviet regime. Consequently, they are the lesser of the two evils, and to that extent are preferable to the Anglo-Americans. But the Russians are still enemies of the West, and outside the pale of Western Culture.
Are you talking about Yockey in general, or Imperium?

Some assertions in Imperium are carried over from assumptions (some of them false) from the second world war. If you read his later stuff he talks about the "Euro-Russian Symbiosis", IE, the historical contradictions between the Slavic world and the West were inverting to the point of the post-war USSR being more "western" in its political organization and cultural essence in a sense than Americanized, deracinated Judeo-liberal Western Europe. Here is one of his later works that touches on this: http://www.jrbooksonline.com/pdf_boo...myofeurope.pdf With talk about the "bolshevism of Washington" and sickness of New York and Hollywood, Yockey appears to be hinting at the future Jew cultural revolution of the 1960's.

It can get difficult to tease out what Yockey is prescribing, granted. But it should be noted that the above work was written for the Socialist Reich Party of Otto Ernst Remer, which was a Nationalsocialist party that was being supported by the Soviet Union (who supported them over the Communist Party itself in West Germany, interestingly enough).


Not sure where you get that he was for a "Strategy of Tension" or his idea of creating an alliance between pro-whites and the USSR was some cynical master plan. Yockey was anti-imperialist (as the Soviets and Arab nationalists were) in the trans-racial sense because he saw cross-cultural expansionism as the beginning of the end for civilizations.

To my knowledge, the strategy of tension was the tactic of NATO and American financed "stay-behinds" trying to rationalize their collaboration (GLADIO) with Jews and the CIA, nothing to do with Yockey. Similar to the laughable alibi "Ukrainian Nazis" give to their followers when the leader of Azov battalion goes to Brussels to conspire with anti-white Jews and eurocrats.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'"
― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona

Last edited by Joe_Smith; January 27th, 2016 at 03:29 PM.
 
Old January 27th, 2016 #17
Jimmy Marr
Moderator
 
Jimmy Marr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Jew S. A.
Posts: 3,511
Jimmy Marr
Default

This talk about the relationship between Russians and Europeans is tangentially related to Alexander Dugin's book Heidegger: The Philosophy of Another Beginning

I'm about 2/3 through the book and I don't understand much of it, but I get the idea that Dugin may be trying to infer a philosophical lineage from the Third Reich to the Fourth Rome (his term for a future Eurasian empire).
 
Old January 27th, 2016 #18
Jim Harting
Senior Member
 
Jim Harting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 654
Jim Harting
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe_Smith View Post
Are you talking about Yockey in general, or Imperium?
I am talking about the total body of Yockey's work, which comprises a more or less seamless whole.

This includes not just Imperium, but also:
  • The Proclamation of London;
  • Der Feind Europas (to which you provide a link to an English translation);
  • "What Is Behind the Hanging of Eleven Jews in Prague?" (aka "The Prague Treason Trials"); and
  • "The Destiny of America"
(There is also "The World In Flames," which is problematical because it was incomplete at the time of his death and was finished by other people before publication.)

Concerning The Enemy of Europe: it was written specifically in support of Naumann and the Socialist Reich Party, which originated the Strategy of Tension (as near as I can tell).

Kevin Coogan's massive biography of Yockey (longer than Imperium itself!) includes an entire chapter on the Strategy of Tension (chapter 34).

See: The Dreamer of the Day: Francis Parker Yockey and the Postwar Fascist International by Kevin Coogan. Autonomedia, New York (1999).

See also: The Beast Reawakens by Martin A. Lee. Little, Brown and Company (1997). See especially Chapter Two, "The Seesaw Strategy."

Lastly, my mentor when I first joined the Movement, back in the long-ago 1960s, was James Harting Madole, who knew Yockey personally and was intimately familiar with his thought. I was privileged to have had the opportunity to speak with JHM about Yockey on several occasions.
__________________
The NEW ORDER: http://theneworder.org
NEW ORDER on Twitter https://twitter.com/NEW_ORDER_NOW
NS Publications: http://nspublications.com
 
Old January 28th, 2016 #19
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 41,394
Blog Entries: 25
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Imperium, by Francis Parker Yockey

Pages 1-16

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/M...ium-pp1-16.mp3 (32m)

Pages 17-37

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/M...um-pp17-37.mp3 (54m)

NOTES: pg 17-37: Destiny (unchangeable, organic), Causality (for inorganic world). see behind and underneath the external facts of a man to the soul driving within. significance defined by relation to destiny. if D not involved, then the fact is merely Incident. of course, this is subjective. "history is the relationship between the past and present." "Life-tendencies": sacred, profane, skeptical. corresponding to political states. Western culture has the most historic soul, of all cultures. conscious of SIGNIFICANCE of our battles etc. history is "true" in that it informs the minds of "significant" men meaning they see its meaning and their lives in relation to it. ... archaeology destroyed the linear view of history by proving different Cultures existed and mattered, they weren't just tie ins or lead ins to Western or Classical culture. only toward end of 1800s did historians begin to treat different Cultures as independent organisms. idea of cultural history, burckhardt's history of italian renaissance is perfect example. schiller articulated need. only later did people come to grasp meaning of High Cultures as organisms, needing to be looked at in totality of social-cultural expression, taken as a unit, an organism, unique and transient in history. the linear view divides into threes: classical, medieval, modern, but it refuses to see that other cultures are INDEPENDENT of our own, not preludes. "the basis of the linear view was cultural egocentricity" (centering the jew, the leftist might say, or israelites, per old testament). history is made not in streets but on "heights." historical RELATIVITY of cultures is the possession of a few high minds. "The number of men in the Western Civilization who were aware of the actual meaning of the Second World War is countable in thousands."

Pages 38-57

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/M...um-pp38-57.mp3 (48m)

Notes: pp38- : History is the record of the lives of eight High Cultures, each an organism. they are indivudal, not all manifesting some common civilization, as the linear-ists think. experience is a relationship between a soul and an outer event. life is the unfolding a soul, for individual and for High Culture. each culture is essentially religious, which gives a unique cast to its philosophy, science etc, and even makes its atheism uniquely distinctive. the progressive is a rationalist who believes civilization is not a stage in Culture but some fixed thing, toward which we are always making "progress." any other thought is pessimism. economics is the bottom of the pyramid in a High Culture. it is the alimentary canal (akin to feeding system in man). the "seven" high cultures preceding our own were "morphologically identical." "If pessimism is despair, optimism is cowardice and stupidity. Is there any need to choose between them? They are twin soul-diseases. Between them lies realism, which wants to know what is, what must be done, how it can be done. Realism is historical thinking, and it is also political thinking."
 
Old January 28th, 2016 #20
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,119
Serbian
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Harting View Post
The Russians, however, are merely "Barbarians" in Yockey's assessment.
Barbarian is not used in a negative way

Russian life is fundamentally barbarian. The barbarian is to be distinguished not only from Culture-men, but from savages, primitives, fellaheen, and decadents as well. Barbarian is a word full of promise, for the barbarian is inwardly in motion. The Germanic tribes that occupied Imperial Rome were barbarians, and from this Germanic stock came, many centuries later, men who wrought the Western Culture. The barbarian is the pre-Cultural form of humanity, just as different from the fellah, the end-product of a Culture, as from the savage, the proto-human type that stands in no relation whatever to a High Culture
__________________
Don Black's Stormfront ''Russians''

http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=456327
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:10 AM.
Page generated in 0.20605 seconds.