Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old July 20th, 2008 #1
William Robert
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,911
Blog Entries: 3
Default Would a Jew use a Nigger to kill White people?



(Excerpt)

OBAMA ESCALATES AFGHANISTAN, ATTACKS PAKISTAN

An example of the heightened aggressiveness that could be expected under the Brzezinski plan was the question of unilateral US bombing of Pakistan. Not a few observers spent the first half of 2008 worrying about an imminent attack on Iran. The reality was that the growing power of the Brzezinski faction in Washington made such an attack less and less likely, at least as far as the United States and the United Kingdom were concerned. But these same observers were largely blind to a program of systematic aggression being carried out by the United States and the British against Pakistan, a country that was almost 3 times larger than Iran, and became equipped with nuclear weapons and medium-range ballistic missiles to deliver them. Every gust of wind in the Persian Gulf was considered a harbinger of Armageddon, but the constant bombing raids in the northwest regions of Pakistan were considered a matter of scant importance.

The irony was that the bombing attacks on Pakistan had been demanded by none other than Obama. Speaking indeed the July 2008 Democratic candidates' debate held in Chicago, Obama had stated: ' what I said was that we have to refocus, get out of Iraq, make certain that we are helping Pakistan deal with the problem of al Qaeda in the hills between Afghanistan and Pakistan. But, if we have actionable intelligence on al Qaeda operatives, including bin Laden, and President Musharraf cannot act, then we should. Now, I think that's just common sense. I don't know about you, but for us to authorize -- (cheers, applause) -- (inaudible) --.' Senator Clinton had disagreed with this reckless and unilateral approach. Senator Dodd had joined Clinton in criticizing Obama. Senator McCain had scored Obama for making such a reckless and incendiary proposal. Even Bush himself stated that he intended to work closely with President Musharraf in regard to all operations conducted by the United States on Pakistani territory.

Since the tenant of the White House had ruled out the unilateral bombing of Pakistan which Obama had demanded, the matter appeared to be closed. Jake Tapper of ABC News found it striking that Obama, who was posing as the peace candidate for Iraq, should be so aggressive in regard to Pakistan. Tapper showed that Obama was raising the issue on the campaign trail, quoting him. '"I understand that President Musharraf has his own challenges," Obama said, "but let me make this clear. There are terrorists holed up in those mountains who murdered 3,000 Americans. They are plotting to strike again. It was a terrible mistake to fail to act when we had a chance to take out an al Qaeda leadership meeting in 2005. If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won't act, we will." There it was again: unilateral US bombing of a sovereign state that had nuclear weapons. Tapper commented: 'In many ways, the speech is counterintuitive; Obama, one of the more liberal candidates in the race, is proposing a geopolitical posture that is more aggressive than that of President Bush.' (Jake Tapper, 'Presidential Candidate Pushes Aggressive Stance Toward Pakistan,' ABC News, August 1, 2007) In other words, when it came to Pakistan, Obama was a bigger warmonger and any Republican or Democrat in sight, including Bush and McCain, to say nothing of Clinton.

Astoundingly, the power of Brzezinski in Washington grew so rapidly that Obama was destined to prevail over Bush, the alleged president, imposing his policy instead of the announced intentions of the man who kept calling himself the president of the United States. Late in March 2008, a press account revealed that the US had indeed gone over to unilaterally bombing northwest Pakistan: 'The United States has escalated its unilateral strikes against al-Qaeda members and fighters operating in "Pakistan's tribal areas, partly because of anxieties that Pakistan's new leaders will insist on scaling back military operations in that country, according to U.S. officials. "We have always said that as for strikes, that is for Pakistani forces to do and for the Pakistani government to decide. . . . We do not envision a situation in which foreigners will enter Pakistan and chase targets," said Farhatullah Babar, a top spokesman for the "Pakistan People's Party, whose leader, Yousaf Raza Gillani, is the new prime minister. "This war on terror is our war." But Kamran Bokhari, a Pakistani who directs Middle East analysis for Strategic Forecasting, a private intelligence group in Washington, said the new government will almost certainly take a harder line against such strikes. "These . . . are very unpopular, not because people support al-Qaeda, but because they feel Pakistan has no sovereignty," he said. The latest Predator strike, on March 16, killed about 20 in Shahnawaz Kot; a Feb. 28 strike killed 12 foreign militants in the village of Kaloosha; and a Jan. 29 strike killed 13 people, including senior al-Qaeda commander Abu Laith al-Libi, in North Waziristan. (Robin Wright and Joby Warrick, :US Steps Up Unilateral Strikes in Pakistan," Washington Post, March 27, 2008)



OBAMA A ONE-WAY TICKET TO THERMONUCLEAR WAR

An Obama regime was therefore a probable one-way ticket to thermonuclear war, an outcome several orders of magnitude worse than anything the neocons had ever plotted. Brzezinski and his friends were more aggressive, more adventurous, more intelligent, and more insane than the neocons. The American people, if they succumbed to Obama, were about to leap out of the frying pan and into the fire.

http://www.rense.com/general82/uspol.htm

Would a Gay Jew




use a Gay Nigger?


Nahh!!


America deserves Obama!

Why?

Because America

has

in-fact

become

an Obama-Nation!!

Last edited by William Robert; July 20th, 2008 at 03:08 AM.
 
Old July 20th, 2008 #2
White Winger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,234
Default

THERTAINLYYYYY!!!! It would be FAAAAAABULOUUUUTH!!!!
 
Old July 23rd, 2008 #3
William Robert
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,911
Blog Entries: 3
Default Is there such a thing as a Good Jew?

Massive Brzezinski Control Of Obama
http://www.rense.com/general82/dedfy.htm

The real power behind the throne-to-be...


It is hard to sort through the hype and heat of Obamania, but one thing is clear: who's pulling the strings, argues Eric Walberg

As the United States election race enters the final stretch, Barack Obama as the candidate promising change is revealing his true colours, much to the despair of anyone actually expecting any change. His recent call to declare Jerusalem the undivided capital of Israel, his denial of Palestinians' right of return, and his support for a Bantustan Palestinian "state" which poses no threat to Israel show how completely he has caved in to the Zionist establishment on that issue.

As President George W Bush calls for early reductions in combat troops in Iraq, Obama's position on Iraq - a vow to bring troops home within 16 months, excepting a "residual force" - looks less and less of a defining moment in his foreign policy. Whatever happens to troop levels, there is no explicit talk of overriding the plans for 14 permanent bases.

Obama is toeing the line in Afghanistan, too. As NATO casualties continue to mount, surpassing monthly Iraqi causalities as of June this year, he is proposing - now seconded by McCain - that the United States shift up to 15,000 more troops there from Iraq. Just prior to his trip to Afghanistan, he wrote in a New York Times Op Ed, "We need more troops, more helicopters, better intelligence- gathering and more nonmilitary assistance to accomplish the mission there." Please, will someone show me the silver lining in an Obama victory in November?

But then none of the above should come as any surprise to those familiar with his chief promoter and foreign policy adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski, who, along with current (and likely future) Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, has already entered history as helping "suck the Soviets into a Vietnamese quagmire". These are the words of President Jimmy Carter's Under-Secretary of Defense Walter Slocumbe in March 1979, eight months before the Soviets were successfully "sucked in", when Gates was CIA chief. The changing of the guard, come November, will change nothing. US foreign policy has a logic which transcends who sleeps in the White House.

What's especially ghoulish about all this is that there are five Brzezinski offspring who are all onboard the Obama wagon: Mark (director of Russian and Eurasian Affairs at the National Security Council under President Bill Clinton, and one of the prime movers of the 2004 color revolution in Ukraine), Ian (currently the US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European and NATO affairs and a backer of Kosovan independence, NATO expansion into Ukraine and Georgia and US ABM missiles in Poland), Mika (political commentator on MSNBC whose interview with Michele Obama contributed to the general media Obamania) and finally, Matthew (a friend of Ilyas Akhmadov, "foreign minister" and US envoy of the Chechen opposition).

Brzezinski's brand of anti-Russian, anti-Muslim geopolitics will dominate a future Obama administration. In Second Chance: Three Presidents and the Crisis of American Superpower, published last year, he lays out his New World Order agenda without so much as a blush. Apparently, there is a global political awakening going on, the goal of which is "dignity". Not economic development, not the alleviation of poverty, not national sovereignty against the IMF and World Bank. Just plain old dignity, though Zbig's brand of dignity is the kind attained through secession, balkanisation, and the creation of weak statelets for each ethnic minority subservient to the US. Think: Kosovo and - if he has his way - Chechenia. Neo- Wilsonian demagogy in the service not of peace but of US world domination, encirclement of Russia and control of the Arab world.

Zbig said in endorsing Obama: "What makes Obama attractive to me is that he understands that we live in a very different world where we have to relate to a variety of cultures and peoples." Obama's alleged global approach and trans-ethnic, trans-racial allure are right out of Zbig's university textbook, or rather Second Chance, which will be the manual for the Obama campaign and presidency.

Obama is literally a second chance for Brzezinski: having destroyed the Soviet Union and shattered the Warsaw Pact, he now wants to dismember the Russian Federation itself and put the finishing touches on Afghanistan as an impregnable US military base against China, Russia... the list is endless. Perhaps Zbig is dreaming of restoring Greater Poland circa 1600 - from the Black Sea to the Baltic, all controlled by petty szlachta aristocrats like... the Brzezinskis?

The Economist blog put it best: "A new brain for Barack Obama! It's 78 years old and it still works perfectly. It belongs to Zbigniew Brzezinski, the peppery ex-national security adviser to Jimmy Carter."

The messianic idealism of the Obama campaign has not been seen since the days of another Brzezinski creation - Jimmy Carter, who made him national security adviser with disastrous results. Brzezinski's anti- Russian obsession back in 1976 prompted him to foment the rise of Islamic fundamentalism, which he touted as the greatest single bulwark against Soviet communism. Tarpley argues that Brzezinski was even a prime behind-the-scenes mover in the overthrow of the Shah of Iran and installing Ayatollah Khomeini in power in Tehran. Brzezinski cared less about the Middle East and its oil than he did about the need for a centre from which Islamic fundamentalism of the most retrograde type could penetrate the soft southern underbelly of the USSR. For Brzezinski, the space between the southern frontier of the Soviet and the Indian Ocean littoral became an "arc of crisis", and we have his handiwork to thank for the horrors taking place there to this day.

The 1980 Carter Doctrine - that the US was determined to dominate the Persian Gulf - is at the root of the first Gulf War, of the present Iraq war, and of the possible war on Iran. Brzezinski's grandiose schemes of world transformation caused a renewal of the Cold War and gave birth to Al-Qaeda, and without Soviet restraint the results could easily have been far more tragic than they turned out to be. By 1980, disillusionment with Carter led to the nightmare of the Reagan regime. But this was of little concern to Brzezinski - a mere blip on his radar screen.

In 2008, we have an obscure Illinois senator, a neophyte with no legislative achievements to speak of, but with a raft of utopian promises, including solving the race problem once and for all. Recession, unemployment and an alarming rise in poverty are of no consequence; a golden age is at hand thanks to his magnetic personality. Since he knows nothing of foreign policy, these matters will be competently managed by the Brzezinski cabal.

But there seems to be one slight hitch. Despite Obama's slavish pro- Israeli genuflections of late, he is still not trusted by the Jewish lobby. Quite possibly because they know who the power behind the throne-to-be is, and they can't stomach him, nor he them. Addressing the AIPAC crew in an interview with The Daily Telegraph, he said, "They operate not by arguing but by slandering, vilifying, demonising. They very promptly wheel out anti-Semitism. There is an element of paranoia in this inclination to view any serious attempt at a compromised peace as somehow directed against Israel."

But then Brzezinski was a key player in Carter's 1978 Camp David Accords, much loathed by the Zionists as giving up Sinai in exchange for a cold peace with Egypt. Brzezinski is definitely not a hardcore Zionist, though he's happy to allow the destruction of Palestine. Perhaps he is, under his suave exterior, still the quintessential Polish anti-Semite, with a vision of the New World Order without Israel at the centre.

If he can keep up the momentum, however, he may be able to outflank the Zionists in Washington and bringing his horse first past the finish line. They are on the defensive these days, what with spy trials, even J Street Project, a Jewish lobby group that - gasp - dares to criticise Israel. Is this, then, the silver lining in an Obama victory?
 
Old July 23rd, 2008 #4
William Robert
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,911
Blog Entries: 3
Default The "Real Jew" says "Watch-out" for Obama!

BRZEZINSKI, OBAMA, & THEIR ZIONIST BANKERS
http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=240

(excerpt)
“ANY DOUBTS THAT OBAMA IS A PUPPETof Zbigniew Brzezinski and the Trilateral Commission ended when Brzezinski appeared on MSNBC’s Morning Joe on March 21 2008 to campaign for Obama,” wrote Rense.com political analyst Webster Tarpley Here.

In his book “Obama A Postmodern Coup” Tarpley says that Brzezinski is seeking a global showdown with Russia and China - a far more dangerous venture than the Neocon/Bush Iraq fiasco.

Tarpley observes that the Neocon/Bush era is over & is now replaced by the Brzezinski-Trilateral-Rockefeller phase of aggression. Tarpley’s most recent remarks are quite revealing:

— “Obama’s first task as President will be to drive the Chinese out of Africa thus depriving them of oil and raw materials. Pakistan and other Chinese allies will be targeted for destruction. When Obama says bomb Pakistan and send more troops into Afghanistan he is expressing the Brzezinski strategy.

“Brzezinski will advise Obama to break up both Russia and China reducing both to petty states which would give Washington another century of world domination” — Here.
 
Old July 24th, 2008 #5
Charles Martel
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The origins of jewish egalitarianism lies within the precepts of christianity itself.
Posts: 1,533
Cool

What kind of dumb question is that? Jews are a disease. They are parasites that will use whatever they can to gain the upper hand.
 
Old July 24th, 2008 #6
Mark Kerpolt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,718
Default

Zbigniew Brzeziński is a Polack kike-alike, not a kike literally (unless I'm mistaken). But he's been trained to be a very good imitation kike, after having served so many kike-led administrations.

Did anyone listen to that interview over at Rense.com with a former White House employee that revealed all sorts of nasty bits about the piece of shit? (Including his insane russophobia, that he'd — for example — love to see the USA setting China up against Russia; even all the way in Africa, over the resources, for the USA to come in to reap the rewards as the ‘third person’).
 
Old November 8th, 2008 #8
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Where's the proof Zbig is a jew?
 
Old November 8th, 2008 #9
William Robert
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,911
Blog Entries: 3
Default I read it in on a few different websites.

Some of the material that I've read in the past has been taken off the web. It's appears to be the "good jew/bad jew game" with Bigjew. "Some" jews in America claim he is anti-semitic, but some jews support him with shared jewish goals.

If you can prove he's not a jew, I'd be willing to accept that.

I believe he may be a "crypto jew" based on his actions, affiliations, and the positions that he has held in the past. Even now, he is actively guiding president-elect Obama as Obama appoints more jews to positions of power.

Can I personally prove he is a jew because he claims to be polish? No, but a genetic test would do the trick. I don't think he'll be rushing to have one of those performed or published anytime soon.

I'll edit the post, if you feel there isn't enough circumstancial evidence that suggests his jewish ethnicity. Jews, jewish suck-poops, jewish wannabees, jewish supporters, jewish tools, they are all the same in my book. You can call him whatever you want. I'm not sure I can respect the difference between a physical jew and a spiritual jew though. To me they are both equally dangerous.

Here are a few documented hints that support the suggestion that he is indeed jewish, yet attempting to conceal that fact.

The adopted Surname Brzezinski comes from his hometown Berezhany.
http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclop...iew-Brzezinski

The first written mention of Berezhany dates from 1374...
Berezhany soon started to attract settlers from all over Poland, including a large number of Jews...

Although the city remained quite populous, with time it lost much of its importance as a trade centre and became populated primarily by Jews as a typical shtetl. (A shtetl is a small town with a large jewish population.)

Isaac Streisand, paternal grandfather of Barbra Streisand, was born here in Berezhany.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berezhany

While in Leipzig, Germany, before World War II, Brzeziński became involved in efforts to rescue European Jews from Nazi concentration camps. In 1978, his efforts on behalf of the Jewish people were recognized by Israeli Prime Minister, Menachem Begin.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tadeusz_Brzezi%C5%84ski

Speaking at a World Jewish Congress Dinner.


http://polish-jewish-heritage.org/Eng/about_us.htm

http://www.city-data.com/forum/histo...rzezinski.html

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php...iew_Brzezinski

http://www.jhuapl.edu/POW/bios/zbrzezinski.htm

http://www.shtetlinks.jewishgen.org/Lodz/biblio2.htm

http://www.speaking.com/speakers/zbi...rzezinski.html

http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2001/2847skunks.html

The book is available to read on-line.

The Sword and the Shield By Christopher M. Andrew, Vasili Mitrokhin, page 241.

Last edited by William Robert; November 8th, 2008 at 08:17 PM.
 
Old November 8th, 2008 #10
Charles Martel
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The origins of jewish egalitarianism lies within the precepts of christianity itself.
Posts: 1,533
Angry

I have to say, the title of this post is assinine.

A jew would sell his own grandmother for a few dollars. It is one of the "prime directives" of their ideology (to act as such).

Jews are the harlots of history, when it suits their ends. Whatever, however. That is the jew.

I'm not sure if this guy is a jew, but he has saddled up to many in the past. It's questionable at least.

I'm signing off. This shit is pissing me off.

Last edited by Charles Martel; November 8th, 2008 at 01:31 AM.
 
Old November 8th, 2008 #11
Mike Mazzone of Palatine
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: With my awesome parents
Posts: 7,802
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles Martel View Post
I'm signing off. This shit is pissing me off.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethel_Merman

Last edited by Mike Mazzone of Palatine; November 8th, 2008 at 02:35 AM.
 
Old November 8th, 2008 #12
Charles Martel
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The origins of jewish egalitarianism lies within the precepts of christianity itself.
Posts: 1,533
Angry

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Mazzone of Palatine View Post
Can you post some documentation? Vids are ok, but limiting. If you have a point, make it. Fair enough? But don't "Rink" your response.

Last edited by Charles Martel; November 8th, 2008 at 03:36 AM.
 
Old November 8th, 2008 #13
Mike Mazzone of Palatine
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: With my awesome parents
Posts: 7,802
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles Martel View Post
Can you post some documentation? Vids are ok, but limiting. If you have a point make it. That is all I ask. Don't "Rink" your response.
Testimonial evidence sword on the bible.


 
Old November 8th, 2008 #14
Charles Martel
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The origins of jewish egalitarianism lies within the precepts of christianity itself.
Posts: 1,533
Unhappy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Mazzone of Palatine View Post
Testimonial evidence sword on the bible.
Where is the documental references Mike? Or you going to do a jew-rink-shit spill? If you state something as fact, reference it. The bars been raised.

No one relies on youtube shit as an effective standpoint to argue from. And you damn well know that Mike. You do.

Back your shit up. Bottom line. Or get in the synagogue entrance line....

Last edited by Charles Martel; November 8th, 2008 at 03:42 AM.
 
Old November 8th, 2008 #15
Mike Jahn
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 7,526
Blog Entries: 3
Default

Mazzone, you are posting Jew created propaganda posters against Nazi Germany?

Are you on drugs again?
 
Old November 8th, 2008 #16
Charles Martel
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The origins of jewish egalitarianism lies within the precepts of christianity itself.
Posts: 1,533
Angry

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Jahn View Post
Mazzone, you are posting Jew created propaganda posters against Nazi Germany?

Are you on drugs again?
Hell, Jett Kike was posting nigger shit from the early 90's about 10 minutes ago. Talk about a free range jew!
 
Old November 8th, 2008 #17
Mike Mazzone of Palatine
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: With my awesome parents
Posts: 7,802
Default

You wait.

 
Old November 8th, 2008 #18
Mike Jahn
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 7,526
Blog Entries: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles Martel View Post
Hell, Jett Kike was posting nigger shit from the early 90's about 10 minutes ago. Talk about a free range jew!
It is obvious that more tardings are necessary or else the forum will decline into chaos.
 
Old November 8th, 2008 #19
Charles Martel
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The origins of jewish egalitarianism lies within the precepts of christianity itself.
Posts: 1,533
Angry

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Mazzone of Palatine View Post
I feel like I am debating with Rabbi Shmuley Boteach! I ask for real world documentation from reliable sources and I get jew-backed nigger videos.

What, am I am in temple here? In hell? Have I died and gone to the puratory of judaism somehow?
 
Old November 8th, 2008 #20
Mike Mazzone of Palatine
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: With my awesome parents
Posts: 7,802
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Jahn View Post
It is obvious that more tardings are necessary or else the forum will decline into chaos.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:51 AM.
Page generated in 2.49773 seconds.