Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old June 14th, 2009 #261
Dan_O
Senior Member
 
Dan_O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: the gym
Posts: 887
Dan_O
Default

Sorry, been drinking vodka.
Here is a picture of me and my wife when I was selling cigarettes and gas to pay for my AAS. No not steroids, my degree!

 
Old June 14th, 2009 #262
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,494
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

White Supremacist and Holocaust Shooter, James W. von Brunn, Once Wrote Article On Television For Billboard Magazine & Once Worked For McCann-Erickson, now McCann Worldgroup

White Supremacist, James W. von Brunn, who killed a guard at the Holocaust Museum this week, worked in a variety of jobs over the years. He worked as an artist, book illustrator and adman. In the August 12, 1957 issue of Billboard magazine, von Brunn wrote an article called, Gov’t or Private? TV Systems Vary. Veteran Adman Surveys Worldwide TV Growth Patterns, Finds 3 Key Systems.

In the short bio at the beginning of the article, James von Brunn, is said to have formerly worked as a film producer for McCann-Erickson, International ( now McCann Worldgroup ). McCann-Erickson, was named Global Agency of the Year for the years 1998-2000. McCann Worldgroup has been chosen to be the Marketing Services Agency for the 2012 Olympics.

At the time, James von Brunn wrote the article for Billboard, he was working for Erwin, Wasey & Co., a Chicago based advertising agency and a film production company best known for producing the television show, Lights Out, which ran from 1946-1952. Famous photographer, Margaret Bourke White, did a beautiful shot of Manhattan for Erwin, Wasey and Co. in 1934. Erwin and Wasey’s ad After Hours is considered one of the top 100 advertisements of all time. Erwin, Wasey & Co. was once given the job of transforming the Jolly Green Giant.

Which all goes to show that James von Brunn was a talented man. He had to be in order to be hired by two topflight advertising agencies. He is not your stereotypical redneck neo-Nazi. Because they have talent, it the James von Brunn and David Duke type White Supremacists that are the most dangerous.

http://upstreamzine.wordpress.com/20...oard-magazine/
 
Old June 14th, 2009 #263
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,494
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Seldom has a single event produced such spinning. Every blogger out there, left or right, has tried to make von Brunn into a charter member of the group he hates most.

The correct lens through which to view, or framework to understand, American politics is:

White vs. jew

Von Brunn is a White, and those opposed to his actions, left or right, are on the side of the jews, the people operating Fox News, CNN, and both political parties.

Von Brunn cannot be understood as a conservative or a liberal, he is not operating in that framework. That framework is for adult children who don't understand the true forces doing battle. They don't understand that Republicans and Democrats are the same thing. As are Bill O'Reilly and Keith Olbermann. James von Brunn understands that. He cares about what is "good for Whites," in the same way that conservatives and liberals care only about what is "good for jews." And that is the way to interpret von Brunn's actions.

Whether they try to link him to Limbaugh or Maddow, commenters left and right agree that von Brunn is nuts, loony, crazy, any other adjective for mental illness.

Von Brunn is not crazy, it's just that the vast majority of America has been brainwashed that anyone who holds beliefs and is willing to risk his life and livelihood to advance them is...crazy. America, under the jews, has become AmeriKwa. And in AmeriKwa, anyone acting on any other motivation than money or pussy is taken to be insane. That's part of the jewish takeover in the sixties. The jews have answers for all the big questions. Not for themselves, but for the white gerbils they preside over. You can chase pussy or asshole, depending on your orientation, lol, or dollars, but the minute you decide to take on the big questions for yourself, let alone try to form independent communities, you become a hater, an extremist, a terrorist, a hater, a kook.

You happy with this state of things?

James von Brunn isn't.

We aren't either.

The jewish dictatorship over America must be destroyed.

Pick your side, White man.

You're either a collaborator or a loyalist.

Choose wisely.

Last edited by Alex Linder; June 14th, 2009 at 03:15 PM.
 
Old June 14th, 2009 #264
F.W. Braun
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,463
Default

June 11, 2009
Holocaust Museum Hullaballoo Reveals “Hate Crimes” Hypocrisy

By Peter Brimelow

Immigration patriots had a number of reasons to be distressed at the news that, at the remarkably advanced age of 88 and armed with a curiously light .22-caliber rifle, James von Brunn attacked the Washington D.C. Holocaust Museum on June 10.

They knew that, as Patrick Cleburne has subsequently confirmed, the Mainstream Media would immediately try to use the story to help ram through the federal “Hate Crimes Prevention Bill”. This had run into so much opposition that its Democratic sponsors apparently decided it must be smuggled through as an undebateable, unamendable rider to some unrelated “must pass” budget bill—after which, of course, it will immediately metastasize into a general attack on free speech about, among other things, immigration.

I did not feel like that. I knew, from long study of the leftist mindset, that in response to this incident the Hate Bill’s advocates would be quite unable to restrain themselves from revealing their true agenda: the suppression of political dissent. And so it has proved.

After all, shooting security guards (and for that matter carrying a gun) is already a crime in the District of Columbia. The law needs no enhancement—let alone federal enhancement.

For example, here’s somebody called Brian Levin (email him) of something called the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at California State University, San Bernardino (your tax dollars at work!) pontificating to Newsweek’s credulous Eve Conant (June 10):

“Was this an isolated incident?”

“It's isolated in the sense that this guy was a lone wolf, certainly in that he acted alone, but he's part of a movement of anti-Semites and Holocaust deniers. He lists major Holocaust-denier groups on his Web site and how there is going to be a major Holocaust-denial conference on July 25 in Orange County, Calif. He may have acted like a lone wolf, but he is part of a movement….

“Why do you think Von Brunn chose to act now?”

“There are several things to bear in mind about why this happened now. You have this Holocaust-denial conference coming up. You also had the big commemoration of D-Day and Buchenwald this [past] weekend, in particular the statements by Elie Wiesel and Obama. This guy [Von Brunn] is a big Holocaust denier. He looks for evidence of Jewish and Zionist control of everything. He went to the Federal Reserve with a shotgun [and was sentenced to four years in prison].

“This also comes at a time when the hate-crimes bill is coming forward. And in the white-supremacist world, the hate-crimes bill is viewed as an attempt by Jews to muzzle criticism of Jews, Israel and discussion of the Holocaust.”

In this Orwellian exercise of doublethink, Professor Levin manages to evade the fact the von Brunn acted alone and instead blame his favorite enemies, specifically opponents of the Hate Crimes bill.

Clearly, they must be suppressed!

In case anyone missed the point, Newsweek headlined the interview: Really A Lone Wolf? James Von Brunn may have acted on his own, but he's hardly alone.

Another example: Homegrown hate groups increase in number: Watchdog group blames recession, election of first black president, by Mara Schiavocampo (who doesn’t look very Italian), MSNBC, June 10, 2009.

The “watchdog group”, of course, is our old friend the Southern Poverty Law Center—or, as we more truthfully call it, the $PLC. Schiavocampo parrots the SPLC’s claim that “926 hate groups are currently operating in the U.S., an all-time high”.

I have personal experience of the mendacity of this claim. Last year, I was contacted by Alexandra Bogdanovic, a silly girl reporter from the Fauquier Times Democrat, who wanted to regurgitate in the usual way the $PLC press release claim that three “hate groups” were operating in Virginia’s Fauquier County (eeek!). One of them was the VDARE Foundation which, whether it’s a “hate group” or not, has never been based in Fauquier County. One of them was the Center For American Unity, whose hateful activities consist of filing erudite amicus briefs in court cases. The third was a post office box registered in the name of a Klan group, no other evidence apparently available (or at least discovered by Bogdanovic). Needless to say, Bogdanovic (email her) went ahead and wrote her shock-horror story anyway.

MSNBC’s Schiavocampo began with a detailed description (supplied by whom?) of what seems to have been a genuine neo-Nazi rally attended by a whole 85 supporters in Missouri. This of course contradicts the MSM meme that “hate” has donned suits and gone respectable.

Then she went on: “As shocking as those views are, groups like this are more popular than ever.”

And, guess what, “experts say it is the immigration debate that is most significantly contributing to the rise of hate groups, an issue that is exacerbated by the shaky economy.”

It’s simple! Immigration debaters = neo-Nazis! What is Congress waiting for?

Then there’s Holocaust Museum shooting: A spike in domestic extremism?, By Patrik Jonsson, Christian Science Monitor, June 10, 2009.

This masterpiece of agitprop actually argues it is precisely the fact that von Brunn acted alone that proves he had organized support:


" ‘If you go back to the original leaderless-resistance ideology ... the idea is you have two separate worlds, where above ground you have the organs of information that provide motivation and radicalization, but it has no direct contact at all with the guys doing illegal activity,’ says Scott Stewart, an analyst with STRATFOR, a global intelligence company in Austin, Texas.

“‘The idea is to operate within the confines of the First Amendment and use those freedoms to radicalize and point the illegal actors in the second camp,’ he adds.”

The CSM’s Jonsson concludes:

“….The problem is understanding the radicalization process and at what point ideology clicks to spawn an actual operation, counterterrorism experts say. Isolating the ‘organs of information’ that spark violent behavior is a complex task that is extremely difficult in a society governed by the First Amendment and civil liberty protections.”

It’s just too bad about that pesky First Amendment! And those darn “civil liberty protections”!

Of course, all this is utter hypocrisy. The flagrant fact is that the Hate Crimes Horde doesn’t give a hoot about “hate” or the lives of innocents. What it wants is to do to proscribe its enemies—and those enemies are defined by religion and race.


* As Nicholas Stix has pointed out, there were 3007 MSM stories the first month about the Matthew Shepherd “hate crime” in the first month after it occurred—but only 46 about Jesse Dirkhising’s rape-torture-murder by homosexual pedophiles. We’ve all heard of the torture-dragging murder of James Byrd, who was black—but no-one has heard of the similar killing of Ken Tillery, who was white.

* As VDARE.COM has repeatedly reported, scores of innocents have been murdered in the last few years by immigrants running amok—we call it “Immigrant Mass Murder Syndrome”. Yet not only is this striking trend not examined by the MSM, but the very fact of the killers’ immigration status (let alone race) is generally repressed.

* As Brenda Walker has repeatedly shown, Americans are dying all the time because of drunk-driving immigrants, especially Mexicans. Obviously, this is the result of a profound cultural clash imported by immigration policy. But Congress and the MSM are silent.

The black guard who died at the Holocaust Museum, Stephen Tyrone Johns, is being promoted as a multicultural hero,

I have sad news for his grieving family.

They don’t care about you—any more than they cared about the victims of 9/11.

They just want to promote their agenda.

The real question about the Holocaust Museum shootings: what drove James von Brunn, by all accounts an intelligent man who served his country honorably in World War II, to this terrible end?


Don’t expect to read the answer—or even the question—in the MSM any time soon.
 
Old June 14th, 2009 #265
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,494
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Complaint filed against von Brunn.












Last edited by Alex Linder; June 14th, 2009 at 03:24 PM.
 
Old June 14th, 2009 #266
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,494
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

When is Peter Brimelow going to stop being a coward and come out and say what he knows to be true:

the left is dominated by jews, and jews hate free speech and guns in white hands.

Jews are the enemy.

The White man must fight the jews in order to regain control of his nations, and thereby a future worth having for his posterity.

Come on, Peter, grow up already.
 
Old June 14th, 2009 #267
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,494
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Notice the sloppiness of the FBI report, typical of this group. Look at this baldly anti-factual assertion:

Specifically, Von Brunn claimed to have a written a short novel entitled "Kill the Best Gentiles", which can be found on the website he created www.holywesternempire.com. The novel detailed how Von Brunn believed the government was being run by Jews and the Jews were looking to extinguish the white race.

"Kill the Best Gentiles" is not a novel. It's a non-fiction work. It is a sign of its arrogance that the FBI pretends in a legal document, under penalty of perjury, that "Kill the Best Gentiles" came out of the imagination of James von Brunn rather than out of the minds of the jews who control and indoctrinate the agents of the FBI.[1] Either this false description of the work is a deliberate lie for political reasons, my guess, or it is a product of the lazy stupidity of "affiant" Ronald Farnsworth, who is very like an affirmative action baby. Either way, in describing "Kill the Best Gentiles" as a novel, Special Agent Ronald Farnsworth committed perjury.

There's also the point that the FBI is not a neutral party; it is on the side of one of the combatants. It accepts training and indoctrination from the ADL, which teaches government agents that anyone who criticizes jews must be regarded as a potential terrorist. The proper thing for the FBI to do is to recuse itself from the investigation and have the court assign a neutral third party.

The FBI uses a non-white term created by the ADL jews it pays to indoctrinate its agents. That term is 'hate,' a term without precedence in Anglo-Saxon common law. Rather, it is a term coined by jews with the specific, loxist intent of using it to deny Whites their civil rights - precisely the things the FBI is supposed to protect.

Last edited by Alex Linder; June 14th, 2009 at 11:22 PM.
 
Old June 14th, 2009 #268
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,494
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Notice also that the FBI claims the entire incident was captured on video. We shall see if that is true, and if the FBI releases the tape.
 
Old June 14th, 2009 #269
F.W. Braun
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,463
Default

Interesting blog from a self-described "Pan-humanist universalist, White ethnocentric anti-racist race realist, dislikes the PC, Cultural Marxist, Identity Politics, Western New Left. Iconoclast, smashes all party lines, angers everyone. Notorious provocateur out to piss off everyone."

(http://robertlindsa y.wordpress. com/about/)
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= ========
May 28, 2009

A Cancer Called the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC)
Jump to Comments

I go on a lot about the White nationalists on here, but the truth is that these racist characters are seriously irrelevant to US politics. Even most White racists in the US, I am certain, want nothing whatsoever to do with them.

From the veneration or apologia for Hitler, to rampant anti-Semitism, to insane proposals like deporting all non-Whites, setting up White separatist enclaves, states or whatever, to worship of Nordicism to the detriment of all the other Europeans, to opposition to miscegenation, friendship and dating with non-Whites, the movement has been a serious failure from Day One and will continue to be one, since its ultra-radical ideas simply do not resonate with most Whites in the US.

In fact, most US Whites are ethnocentric and do believe that US White culture is worth saving. A recent poll showed that 73% of US Whites broadly said they were proud to be White and that White culture was a value worth defending.

One would think that a pro-White movement would be so moderate as to represent the views of this 73%, most of whom are probably integrationists, support non-White immigration, oppose White separatism and eviction of non-Whites, are open to interracial friendship, dating and marriage if not in themselves and in others, and are broadly non-racist to anti-racist sorts of folks.

One would think a logical movement could appeal to this 73% of Whites, most of whom don't like to see our race dragged through the mud with incessant hate speech and hate propaganda, nor do they appreciate the many hate crimes against our people and the great deal of discrimination that our people face.

Forget it.

No pro-White movement will ever be sane enough to appeal to these folks. The problem is not just the fact anyone in the US that stands up and says they are pro-White nowadays is probably a ferocious racist.

The problem also lies in maniacal organizations like the SPLC, named in the title.

Any expressions of White ethnocentrism are immediately pounded by SPLC attack dogs as White Supremacism. Not only that, but the SPLC hearts illegal aliens. Seriously, passionately. I think the leadership actually wants to invite the illegals under the sheets with them, such is their love for the criminal invaders, the dregs of Mesoamerica.

Every single organization that has tried to fight against illegal immigration has been slammed by the SPLC scum as "racist" and "White supremacist. " Their acolytes in the elite media echo along. Such that even reasonable Whites now think anti-illegal immigration means dangerous, wild-eyed nativist racism. Why do they think this? The elitists in the MSM told them so.

Check out this sorry story here. Your average US Jew is sane, and many of them are open to the sane notion that millions of illegal aliens in the US really sucks. The Jewish elite in the Organized Jewish Community won't have any of that. The message is so popular with ordinary Jews that they are shutting it down.

The illegal immigration debate has always shown a vast elite – commoner disconnect in the US. Ordinary, working class and middle class Americans totally hate illegal immigration. Surveys show that adds up to 70-80% of the US. Yet a political – media – wealthy elite that runs our media and political parties has been lording it over us commoners and frankly the US proletariat. They can't get enough illegals. As the elitists control the US, the opinions of 75% of Americans get tossed out with the trash.

The mainstream anti-illegal organizations go to extreme lengths to keep their noses clean. They try to ferret out all the racists in their organizations. On their websites, racist commentary is deleted and the commenters are banned. They try very hard to make this an anti-racist movement. Sure there are racists in the movement. Of course racists hate illegals just like anyone else. Who would have thought otherwise?

The truth is that while White nationalism is ludicrous joke in the US (Thank God!) the PC Nazis in the SPLC have essentially colonized American thought with their Cultural Marxist poison. It's spread to the entire White West.

The SPLC's line is that some ghost-like White racists threaten the US. That's hilarious. The truth is that assholes like the SPLC and their Identity Politics buddies are more dangerous to, and have done more harm to, this nation that the White nationalists could in countless centuries.

(http://robertlindsa y.wordpress. com/2009/ 05/28/a-cancer- called-the- southern- poverty-law- center-splc/)
 
Old June 14th, 2009 #270
OTPTT
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,896
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
Notice also that the FBI claims the entire incident was captured on video. We shall see if that is true, and if the FBI releases the tape.
Did anyone see him with a rifle before entering the 'museum?' Are there eye witnesses that saw him firing a rifle inside of the 'museum?' If the guard was killed by his own co-workers how hard would it be to plant an old rifle on or near von Brunn's body? I bet they don't release any of the video tape.
 
Old June 14th, 2009 #271
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,494
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

[1] Proof that the FBI is not a neutral crime-fighting body but national political police trained to sniff out and snuff out any resistance to the organized jews who are the real political power controlling the United States. The ADL, through ongoing indoctrination sessions, teaches the FBI leadership and agents that they are to treat all White men, every single one of them, as potential terrorists who must be spied on, harassed and persecuted if they so much as criticize jews verbally.

http://www.adl.org/learn/adl_law_enf...nt/default.htm

[The below is a small sample of ADL brainwashing sessions visited upon huge numbers of federal, state and local police.]

Senior Law Enforcement Personnel Attend ADL Anti-Terrorism Course
05/13/09

ADL held the fifteenth session of its Advanced Training School (ATS) course on Extremist and Terrorist Threats from May 10-12 in Washington, DC.

• ADL Provides Training on Domestic Terrorism to the ATF
05/04/09
Training for ATF agents at Bureau headquarters in Washington, DC.

• Extremism Training at Las Vegas Criminal Intelligence Conference
05/04/09
ADL participated in the 2009 Law Enforcement Intelligence Unit (LEIU) Conference in Las Vegas, Nevada.

• Domestic Terrorism Training in Ohio
05/04/09
Right-wing extremism training in Toledo, Ohio.

• Domestic Terrorism Conference Attracts Law Enforcement Personnel from Throughout California
04/02/09
More than 200 law enforcement personnel from throughout California attended ADL's all-day conference, "Domestic Terrorism: From Detection to Response," on March 24 at the Skirball Cultural Center in Los Angeles.

• Law Enforcement and Society: Lessons of the Holocaust
03/19/09
Law Enforcement and Society (LEAS) training conducted for the FBI's National Executive Institute.

• ADL Trains Law Enforcement Across Southwest
03/17/09
Right-wing extremism trainings conducted in Nevada and Colorado.

• Extremism Trainings in Arizona
02/13/09
Series of domestic extremism trainings held in Arizona.

• Domestic Extremism Trainings in the Midwest
02/13/09
Series of domestic extremism trainings held across the midwest.

• Connecticut Extremism Briefings
02/13/09
Number of right-wing extremism trainings held in New Haven.

• Counterterrorism Conference In San Diego
02/12/09
Sixth annual Goldberg Charitable Trust Counterterrorism Conference held in San Diego.

FBI Director Honors ADL with Community Leadership Award
01/08/09
The ADL received the FBI Director's Community Leadership Award, which honors efforts in combating crime, terrorism, drugs and violence in America.
 
Old June 14th, 2009 #272
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,494
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Mossad and the Jewish Problem

by Dr. William Pierce

For several years, I have been warning in these broadcasts about the growing infiltration and subversion of American law-enforcement agencies by Jewish pressure groups. This process, which has been going on at a significant rate for more than two decades, accelerated during the Clinton administration, especially after the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995, when Jewish groups put themselves forward as "experts on terrorism," based on their experience in repressing Palestinians and on their undercover snooping into dissident groups in the United States. They offered training seminars to the FBI and other Federal police agencies, to various military units, and to state and local police agencies.

"We will show you how to recognize terrorists and potential terrorists and how to deal with them. We will tell you about these dangerous dissident organizations, these 'hate' groups, and we will help you to prevent another terrorist bombing, such as the one carried out by Timothy McVeigh in Oklahoma City," the Jewish groups told the police and military agencies. The most visible of these groups was the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, but as we will see, there also were other, less visible Jewish groups at work.

Never mind that Timothy McVeigh had not belonged to any dissident group but had acted solely as an angry individual determined to send the government a message that its behavior in massacring the members of the Branch Davidian church in Waco, Texas, would not be tolerated. Never mind that the Anti-Defamation League and other Jewish groups offering their services really were pushing the military and law-enforcement agencies to shift their emphasis toward the investigation and repression of dissidents and the enforcement of a brand-new category of laws -- so-called "hate crime" and "speech crime" laws -- rather than toward the prevention of terrorism.

Never mind those things; it was the Clinton era, and Bill Clinton had brought more Jews into the government than any previous President. Jews were riding high in the Clinton administration, from Monica Lewinsky to Madaleine Albright. When the Jews wanted something, the Jews got it, and smart bureaucrats, including those in the military and law-enforcement agencies, knew better than to ask questions.

Bill Clinton's extraordinary partiality to Jews lasted right up to the moment he left office, with a vastly disproportionate number of the last-minute pardons and commutations of sentences that he issued on January 20 last year going to Jewish criminals. The most notorious of these was the international Jewish super-swindler Marc Rich, who was able to persuade the head Jew in the Anti-Defamation League, Abe Foxman, to intercede with Clinton on his behalf.

All of this partiality has served Mr. Clinton well. In his first year after leaving office, he received $9.2 million in speaking fees, most of it from Jewish organizations. He received $400,000 last year from one Jewish organization alone, the Jewish National Fund, for three speeches. More than nine million dollars for some 70 speeches during the course of a year. Fascinating, isn't it? You can find more information on Mr. Clinton's career as a speaker to Jewish groups for huge fees in the June 18 issue of the New York Times, if you look carefully enough.

Well, that was Bill Clinton, a Democrat and a flamboyantly crooked lawyer from Arkansas who appealed to the lowest elements in the electorate and had a love affair with the Jewish mass media. Most voters hoped for more from George Bush and the Republicans. Unfortunately, what we've gotten is more of the same. In fact, Jewish infiltration and subversion of our military and law-enforcement agencies has proceeded even faster since Mr. Bush took office. Bush certainly doesn't need the money from speaking fees, but he nevertheless has given virtual run of the government to Jews. Under Mr. Bush as under Mr. Clinton, what the Jews want the Jews get, and no one in the government has the courage or the integrity to challenge this situation.

We talked last week about the FBI turning loose 200 Israeli espionage agents that it arrested in the United States last year and about its refusal to arrest the anthrax terrorist, who killed five people and terrorized the whole country with his mailings of anthrax-infected letters. In the anthrax case, the FBI still is putting on a big show of trying to find the perpetrator. FBI spokesmen claim that more personnel and resources are allocated to catching the anthrax terrorist than to any other case except the 9/11 attack itself. I claim that this is all a fraud: that the FBI knows who the perpetrator is but has orders not to arrest him, because he is a Jew who carried out the anthrax mailings in an attempt to cast suspicion on Muslims and to generate public hostility against Israel's enemies. If this became public knowledge, there would be a substantial drop in support among ordinary Americans for Israel and for Mr. Bush's current war in the Middle East.

The big question is, why would the FBI go along with such a coverup? Even with orders directly from Attorney General John Ashcroft or from George Bush himself, any FBI official who went along with the coverup would be taking a huge risk. Why do that for the sake of Israel? Who would protect the FBI people involved if the coverup got blown? The "partnership" between the Anti-Defamation League and the FBI that both ADL National Director Abe Foxman and FBI Director Robert Mueller have been bragging about doesn't seem enough to account for such a flagrant dereliction of duty on the part of the FBI. Surely, someone in the FBI would blow the whistle.

Actually, someone has blown the whistle, but you'd hardly know it from reading the news. Of course, there's been much coverage of one recent FBI whistle-blower, Coleen Rowley, a special agent in the FBI's Minneapolis field office, in connection with FBI officials ignoring reports she sent to Washington headquarters last August -- that was before the September 11 attack -- about a suspected terrorist, Zacarias Moussaoui, who was attempting to learn to fly 747 jets. But there's been very little coverage of another FBI whistle-blower, Sibel Edmonds, and the coverage of her far more alarming revelations has been quite cryptic, to say the least.

There was a story in the Washington Post ten days ago, on June 19, about several FBI whistle-blowers, one of whom was Sibel Edmonds, who worked as a translator of wiretapped messages in the FBI's Washington, DC, office. Despite her name, Edmonds is, in fact, a Jewess. But she is a rare Jewess, without a very strong sense of loyalty to her tribe. Indeed, an alarmingly high percentage of the FBI's wiretap translators are Jews, and nearly all of them who translate Middle Eastern languages are Jews. Most of these have a much stronger sense of their Jewishness than does Edmonds, as Edmonds found out when they tried to recruit her into the Mossad, Israel's super-secret agency for espionage, terror, and assassination.

The Washington Post story relates her account of the recruitment attempts in cryptic language that clearly is intended to avoid mentioning the words "Jew," "Israel," or "Mossad," lest our gallant, little democratic ally in the Middle East or its partisans in this country be cast in a bad light. I'll now read to you the relevant portions of that June 19 story in the Washington Post:

That whistle-blower, Sibel Edmonds, 32, a former wiretap translator in the Washington field office, raised suspicions about a co-worker's connections to a group under surveillance. Under pressure, FBI officials have investigated and verified the veracity of parts of Edmonds' story, according to documents and people familiar with an FBI briefing of congressional staff.... The FBI confirmed that Edmonds' co-worker had been part of an organization that was a target of top-secret surveillance and that the same co-worker had "unreported contacts" with a foreign government official subject to the surveillance....

The FBI said it was unable to corroborate an allegation by Edmonds that she was approached to join the targeted group. Edmonds said she told Dennis Saccher, a special agent in the Washington field office who was conducting the surveillance, about the co-worker's actions and Saccher replied, "It looks like espionage to me." Saccher declined to comment when contacted by a reporter.

Edmonds was fired in March after she reported her concerns. Government officials said the FBI fired her because her "disruptiveness" hurt her on-the-job "performance." Edmonds says she believes she was fired in retaliation for reporting on her co-worker.

Edmonds began working at the FBI in late September [of last year]. In an interview she said she became particularly alarmed when she discovered that a recently hired FBI translator was saying that she belonged to the Middle Eastern organization whose taped conversations she had been translating for FBI counterintelligence agents. Officials asked that the name of the target group not be revealed for national security reasons....

Edmonds said that on several occasions the translator tried to recruit her to join the targeted foreign group. "This person told us she worked for our target organization," Edmonds said in an interview. "These are the people we are targeting, monitoring."

Edmonds would not identify the other translator, but the Post has learned from other sources that she is a 33-year-old U.S. citizen whose native country is home to the target group. Both Edmonds and the other translator are U.S. citizens who trace their ethnicity to the same Middle Eastern country. Reached by telephone last week, the woman, who works under contract for the FBI's Washington field office, declined to comment.

In December, Edmonds said the woman and her husband, a U.S. military officer, suggested during a hastily arranged visit to Edmonds' Northern Virginia home on a Sunday morning that Edmonds join the group. 'Are you a member of the particular organization?,' Edmonds recalled the woman's husband saying. 'It's a very good place to be a member. There are a lot of advantages of being with this organization and doing things together' -- this is our targeted organization -- 'and one of the greatest things about it is you can have an early, an unexpected, early retirement. And you will be totally set if you go to that specific country.'

Edmonds also said the woman's husband told her she would be admitted to the group, especially if she said she worked for the FBI. Later, Edmonds said, the woman approached her with a list dividing up individuals whose phone lines were being secretly tapped: Under the plan the woman would translate conversations of her former co-workers in the target organization, and Edmonds would handle other phone calls. Edmonds said she refused and that the woman told her that her lack of cooperation could put her family in danger.

Edmonds said she also brought her concerns to her supervisor and other FBI officials in the Washington field office. When no action was taken, she said, she reported her concerns to the FBI's Office of Professional Responsibility, then to Justice's inspector general.

"Investigations are being compromised," Edmonds wrote to the inspector general's office in March. "Incorrect or misleading translations are being sent to agents in the field. Translations are being blocked and circumvented."

Government officials familiar with the matter who asked not to be identified said that both Edmonds and the woman were given polygraph examinations by the FBI and that both passed.

I'm sorry that the cryptic language made that report more difficult to understand than it otherwise would have been: a certain unnamed "Middle Eastern country," an unnamed co-worker of Sibel Edmonds who is a native of that unnamed Middle Eastern country, an unnamed "target organization" in that unnamed Middle Eastern country, and so on. The Washington Post tells us that the cryptic language is necessary "for national security reasons." That's certainly a phony excuse. Do you really believe that the folks in the Israeli Embassy reading this article can't figure out who is being talked about? The real reason for not mentioning names is not to keep the Mossad from finding out that they're being investigated; it's to keep any Sally Soccermoms or Joe Sixpacks who might stumble across the story on their way to the comic strips or the sports pages from getting a clue as to who's really calling the shots at the FBI these days.

Let me just run over the scenario again. After the Oklahoma City bombing, during a time when the FBI was being criticized for letting the bombing happen, Jewish groups promoted themselves as "experts" on terrorism and offered to train FBI agents and other law-enforcement and military personnel. One of these Jewish groups was the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, a group heavily involved in illegal activity and with longstanding ties to Jewish organized crime figures, such as international super-swindler Marc Rich and Las Vegas gangster Moe Dalitz. Another of these Jewish groups was Israel's espionage and terror organization, Mossad, which specializes in the assassination of Israel's enemies in other countries, using letter bombs, car bombs, exotic poisons, and trained hit-men armed with silencer-equipped submachine guns.

The impropriety of FBI involvement with either of these Jewish organizations should have been obvious, but in the Clinton era, no bureaucrat in Washington dared say anything critical of Jews or Israel. George Bush has a different style, but no more scruples than Bill Clinton. By the time he became President, the corruption had proceeded so far that it was easy for him to decide to join it instead of trying to lick it. And early in his administration another major terrorist event -- that of September 11 -- gave Jewish groups another rationale for strengthening their "partnership" with U.S. law-enforcement agencies. With Anti-Defamation League agents working on the outside and redefining the types of criminal activity with which the FBI should concern itself, and Mossad agents working inside and preempting for themselves all investigations of interest to Israel, including all investigations of Israeli espionage, it is no wonder that the FBI's efficiency, morale, and prestige have plummeted, and things that would have been unthinkable a decade ago -- such as refusing to prosecute the members of the largest espionage ring ever broken up in the United States and engaging in an internal coverup of the anthrax terrorism case -- could occur.

This is a depressing situation -- and as I have warned repeatedly, an extremely dangerous situation. We are in grave danger of losing all of our remaining liberty and soon thereafter becoming extinct as a people, as a race. There certainly is no hope at all of rectifying this situation from the top, through the elected politicians and the top bureaucrats. Did you hear George Bush make his pronouncement on Monday about the conflict between the Jews and the Palestinians? Yasser Arafat, the elected leader of the Palestinians, must go because he has been "tainted by terrorism." Anyone who, like Arafat, has condoned terrorism is unacceptable as a negotiating partner for the Israelis and must be replaced by someone who has clean hands. Really! I can imagine all of the Jewish leaders, including that "man of peace," as Bush calls him, Ariel Sharon, rolling on the floor with laughter during Bush's statement. I would not be surprised if it were Sharon himself, the Butcher of Beirut, the mass murderer of Palestinian women and children, the preeminent terrorist and war criminal in the Middle East, who wrote that statement for Bush.

George Bush is a man utterly without honor, without principles, without a shred of genuine patriotism or racial loyalty. As long as the Jewish media continue to give him good press, he is perfectly content to be Ariel Sharon's step'n'fetchit and to say and do whatever he is told to say and do. Underneath Bush is Attorney General John Ashcroft, a nutcase religious fanatic whose historical role model is Tomas de Torquemada and who believes that the Jews can do no wrong because that's what it says in the Bible. And then there is FBI Director Robert Mueller, a pitiful specimen of an unprincipled career bureaucrat indeed, a man who is completely unperturbed by the ongoing Jewish subversion and takeover of the FBI.

Our one basis for hope is the fact that the takeover is not yet complete. If it were complete, there would be no debate, no investigation by some FBI agents of the Mossad, no newspaper articles with cryptic language like the one I read to you from the Washington Post. The fact is there are many FBI special agents who are not happy about what is being done to the FBI. And there are hundreds of thousands of perceptive and intelligent White Americans who also are not happy. Unfortunately, very few of these people have the courage to do or even say anything about what is happening.

And there is one other factor besides a lack of courage, although it is a related factor, and that is the inability to address our problem in a truly fundamental way, a truly radical way. There are many patriotic Americans who would be alarmed to learn that a foreign espionage organization, the Mossad, has infiltrated the FBI and is able to subvert the FBI's operations, but there are fewer patriotic Americans willing and able to draw the necessary conclusions about the overall role of Jews in America. They see the problem as simply a problem with the Mossad. They resist tying the Mossad problem to the Anti-Defamation League problem and to the problem of Jewish influence in the government generally. They resist seeing the connection between the problem of Jewish influence in the government and Jewish influence in the mass media of news and entertainment.

They resist seeing these things because to see them, to examine them, to think about them and draw conclusions from them, is to become anti-Jewish, anti-Semitic. And they have been so strongly conditioned against that for so long that they simply can't deal with it. Many who are brave enough and honest enough to speak out about a Mossad problem cannot even think about the much larger Jewish problem of which the Mossad problem is only a relatively small part. And as long as we refuse to think about the problem, as long as we are afraid to think about it, we cannot hope to solve it.

And really, we'd better begin thinking about this problem very soon. Time is running out for America and for our people.
 
Old June 14th, 2009 #273
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,494
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

The FBI can only be regarded as a hostile arm of the organized jewish power running America into the ground.
 
Old June 14th, 2009 #274
Hayden
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,093
Default

Also interesting, is the charge that claims premeditated murder of the security guard.

More than likely, one of the Wackenhut guards shot their own man.
 
Old June 14th, 2009 #275
Walter E. Kurtz
Senior Member
 
Walter E. Kurtz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,919
Walter E. Kurtz
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hayden View Post
Also interesting, is the charge that claims premeditated murder of the security guard.

More than likely, one of the Wackenhut guards shot their own man .
Quite likely, considering that the Wackenhut guards fired eight .38 caliber rounds and only one round struck von Brunn. And that round only wounded von Brunn in the mouth. Where did the other seven .38 caliber rounds go? Perthaps one entered Guard Stephen Johns' chest? Considering the lack of proficiency in shooting on the part of the security guards, that thesis cannot be ruled out.
__________________
I'm so depressed about outsourcing I called the suicide hotline and got a call center in Pakistan. They got all excited and asked me if I could drive a truck.

Last edited by Walter E. Kurtz; June 14th, 2009 at 07:31 PM.
 
Old June 14th, 2009 #276
Oy Ze Hate
We're the Good Guys
 
Oy Ze Hate's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pediatric Burn Unit
Posts: 4,776
Oy Ze Hate
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wildbill View Post
Who is hate filled shooter?

Who is hate filled shooter?

Who is hate filled shooter?

They don't call it television programming for nothing.
 
Old June 14th, 2009 #277
Dylan Jones
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 555
Dylan Jones
Default

James W. Von Brunn's entry in a notebook found in his car outside the House of Whorers as described in the criminal complaint.
Quote:
You want my weapons - this is how you'll get them. The Holocaust is a lie. Obama was created by Jews. Obama does what his Jew owners tell him to do. Jews captured America's money. Jews control the mass media. The 1st Amendment is abrogated - henceforth. See: holywesternempire.org. JVB swore (LT USNR) to defend the Constitution against all enemies. See: Talmud - Sanhedrin "Kill the Best Gentiles!" At the end of the above writings appears the signature: "James W. Von Brunn."
 
Old June 14th, 2009 #278
Axel Faaborg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,110
Axel Faaborg
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by F.W. Braun View Post
In fact, most US Whites are ethnocentric and do believe that US White culture is worth saving. A recent poll showed that 73% of US Whites broadly said they were proud to be White and that White culture was a value worth defending.

One would think that a pro-White movement would be so moderate as to represent the views of this 73%, most of whom are probably integrationists, support non-White immigration, oppose White separatism and eviction of non-Whites, are open to interracial friendship, dating and marriage if not in themselves and in others, and are broadly non-racist to anti-racist sorts of folks.

One would think a logical movement could appeal to this 73% of Whites, most of whom don't like to see our race dragged through the mud with incessant hate speech and hate propaganda, nor do they appreciate the many hate crimes against our people and the great deal of discrimination that our people face.
So, in order to be 'logical' and appeal to the mainstream, we have to basically be Republicans.

Nice.

Just take all of the Pro-White stuff out, and you'd have a very viable Pro-White movement, according to this guy.
 
Old June 14th, 2009 #279
Sándor Petőfi
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: In your head
Posts: 5,325
Default

Quote:
Pan-humanist universalist, White ethnocentric anti-racist race realist, dislikes the PC, Cultural Marxist, Identity Politics, Western New Left.
Snow is black.
 
Old June 14th, 2009 #280
Sándor Petőfi
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: In your head
Posts: 5,325
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Axel Faaborg View Post
So, in order to be 'logical' and appeal to the mainstream, we have to basically be Republicans.

Nice.

Just take all of the Pro-White stuff out, and you'd have a very viable Pro-White movement, according to this guy.
That guy wouldn't know logic if it bit him on his mother's ass.
 
Reply

Tags
#1, cnn, holocaust museum, james von brunn, news

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:53 PM.
Page generated in 2.13786 seconds.